Archive for the ‘Culture Wars’ Category

Campus culture wars over ‘anti-right bias’ threaten to spread – Times Higher Education (THE)

Politicians claims that universities are systematically prejudiced against researchers and students with conservative views raise the prospect that Western institutions could become key battlegrounds in a new age of culture wars.

Betsy DeVos, Donald Trumps education secretary, lit a fire under the long-standing debate over supposed liberal bias last week in her speech at the Conservative Political Action Conference in Maryland. After asking how many in the audience at the biggest conservative conference in the US were college students, she said: The fight against the education establishment extends to you, too. The faculty, from adjunct professors to deans, tell you what to do, what to say, and more ominously, what to think.

They say that if you voted for Donald Trump, youre a threat to the university community. But the real threat is silencing the First Amendment rights [including free speech] of people with whom you disagree.

In the Netherlands, parties of the Right recently passed a motion in Parliament thatasks the government to request advice and consideration from the Royal Dutch Academy of Sciences about whether self-censorship and limitation of diversity of perspectives is rife in the countrys universities and research institutes.

Pieter Duisenberg, the member of the House of Representatives for the centre-right VVD who proposed the motion, told Times Higher Educationthat he put forward the plan after being approached by conservative academics who felt discriminated against in being denied senior posts and in research funding.

The American-born politician also cited the Heterodox Academy, a group of US professors that warns of loss of viewpoint diversity and advocates for a more intellectually diverse academy.

Mr Duisenberg added: That combination of people approaching me plus the debate that is [happening] in other countries has led me to the question, is this an issue in our academies, yes or no?

He continued: What Im not advocating is quotas on political viewsWhat Im advocating is freedom in the academy.

The motion won backing not just from the VVD, but also from Geert Wilders anti-immigration PVV, the party that is leading in many polls ahead of the Netherlands 15 March general election and that is regarded by many as having pushed the VVD in a populist direction.

Jet Bussemaker, the education minister whose Labour Party opposed the motion, will decide whether the inquiry should be taken forward. Although she might reject it, Mr Duisenberg suggested that a new government could still take it forward post-election.

While the Dutch Parliament motion shows debates about claims of liberal bias in universities spreading beyond the US, in America those debates are reaching a new intensity under Mr Trumps presidency.

Before Ms DeVos intervention, the president had already issued a Twitter threat to strip the University of California, Berkeley of federal funding over its perceived failure to safeguard the free speech of right-wing provocateur Milo Yiannopoulos when it cancelled his speech on safety grounds following violent protests.

Meanwhile, a Republican state senator in Iowa, Mark Chelgren, recently filed a bill that aims to force the states public universities to take into account the registered political party affiliations of prospective professors when hiring, to ensure a partisan balance.

A. Lee Fritschler, one of the authors of the 2008 book Closed Minds? Politics and Ideology in American Universities, said: I think the rhetoric is going to increase in this country about universities beingcentres of opposition.

Professor Fritschler, emeritus in George Mason Universitys Schar School of Policy and Government and a former assistant secretary of education under Bill Clinton, said that while there was almost unanimity in science on evidence for climate change, you have a president of the United States come along and say its all nonsense. Weve never had that kind of confrontation in the past.

The Closed Minds? survey found that while there was a clear liberal weighting to the politics of US academics, conservative professors do not, generally, believe they are discriminated against.

Jon A. Shields and Joshua M. Dunn, authors of Passing on the Right: Conservative Professors in the Progressive Academy, surveyed conservative academics and found that while a third had concealed their politics before gaining tenure, this was a temporary hardship and they did not find universities implacably hostile to their ideas.

The authors have argued that conservatives should deescalate their rhetorical war against the progressive university, as such attacks are discouraging young conservatives from becoming professors.

Andrew Hartman, author of A War for the Soul of America: A History of the Culture Wars and professor of history at Illinois State University, suggested that culture wars about the universities will be intense during the Trump years.

I think the Trump administration, following the trajectory of the GOP [Republican Party], is likely to be the most anti-intellectual since perhaps the 1920s, he said. So the debate will be about whether society should subsidise humanities learning.

Professor Hartman said that while local control of education and the role of evangelical Christians were distinctive to US culture wars over universities, other Western nations could shadow some developments.

If right-wing populist parties gain political power, and if universities remain committed to the values of multiculturalism and cosmopolitanism, it seems only logical that culture wars will result, he said.

john.morgan@tesglobal.com

The rest is here:
Campus culture wars over 'anti-right bias' threaten to spread - Times Higher Education (THE)

If culture wars are coming, autonomy cannot be surrendered – Times Higher Education (THE)

Wherever you look in Western politics, it seems that the Right is in the ascendancy. This isnt confined to Trumpism and Brexit far-Right candidates are riding high in the polls, for example, ahead of elections in both France and the Netherlands.

These trends raise awkward questions for universities because, while they have long been bastions of liberal thinking, they have also presented themselves as being deeply rooted in their communities. What the past 12 months have revealed instead is a yawning divide between the views of higher education institutions and many of their neighbours.

So far, universities have largely been left to search for the answers to these questions by themselves. But now there are emerging signs that a newly emboldened Right might choose to confront head-on what its supporters perceive as bias against conservative researchers and students in the academy.

US education secretary Betsy DeVos call to conservative students to fight against the silencing of their free speech on campus, attempts in Iowa to achieve partisan balance when hiring professors, and a proposed investigation in the Netherlands into the limitation of diversity of perspectives in higher education could all be seen as the opening salvos in a new age of culture wars.

Universities might feel vulnerable in such a scenario. And it is important for a wide range of perspectives to be heard on campus, for it is only through debate that the apparent social isolation that higher education institutions are enduring can be bridged.

But this seems to be one topic where university leaders must be prepared to stand up and resist, because it is institutions autonomy that is central to their success, and to the discoveries that drive forward our economies and societies.

While the Right might be seizing the political prizes, universities should not feel too dislocated: Hillary Clinton won the popular vote in the US presidential election, and the 48 per cent who voted for the UK to stay in the European Union are only just in the minority.

These communities need a voice, too, and, with centrist and left-leaning political parties seemingly more divided and drifting than ever before, the case for academics to scrutinise populist politicians is stronger than ever before.

chris.havergal@tesglobal.com

Originally posted here:
If culture wars are coming, autonomy cannot be surrendered - Times Higher Education (THE)

Patrick J. Buchanan: Is secession a solution to cultural war? – Tulsa World

As the culture war is about irreconcilable beliefs about God and man, right and wrong, good and evil, and is at root a religious war, it will be with us so long as men are free to act on their beliefs.

Yet, given the divisions among us, deeper and wider than ever, it is an open question as to how, and how long, we will endure as one people.

Your current subscription does not provide access to this content. Please click the button below to manage your account.

Thank you for reading and relying on TulsaWorld.com for your news and information. You have now viewed your allowance of free articles.

After World War II, our judicial dictatorship began a purge of public manifestations of the Christian nation that Harry Truman said we were.

In 2009, Barack Obama retorted, We do not consider ourselves to be a Christian nation. Secularism had been enthroned as our established religion, with only the most feeble of protests.

One can only imagine how Iranians or Afghans would deal with unelected judges moving to de-Islamicize their nations. Heads would roll, literally.

Which bring us to the first culture war skirmish of the Trump era. Taking sides with Attorney General Jeff Sessions against Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, the president rescinded the Obama directive that gave transgender students the right to use the bathroom of their choice in public schools. President Donald Trump sent the issue back to the states and locales to decide.

While treated by the media and left as the civil rights cause of our era, the bathroom debate calls to mind Marxs observation, History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce.

Can anyone seriously contend that whether a 14-year-old boy, who thinks he is a girl, gets to use the girls bathroom is a civil rights issue comparable to whether African-Americans get the right to vote?

There was vigorous dissent, from DeVos, to returning this issue to where it belongs, with state and local officials.

After yielding on the bathroom question, she put out a statement declaring that every school in America has a moral obligation to protect children from bullying, and directed her Office of Civil Rights to investigate all claims of bullying or harassment against those who are most vulnerable in our schools.

Now, bullying is bad behavior, and it may be horrible behavior. But when did a Republican Party that believes in states rights decide this was a responsibility of a bureaucracy Ronald Reagan promised but failed to shut down? When did the GOP become nanny-staters?

Bullying is something every kid in public, parochial or private school has witnessed by graduation. While unfortunate, it is part of growing up.

But what kind of society, what kind of people have we become when we start to rely on federal bureaucrats to stop big kids from harassing and beating up smaller or weaker kids?

While the bathroom debate is a skirmish in the culture war, Trumps solution send the issue back to the states and the people there to work it out may point the way to a truce assuming Americans still want a truce.

For Trumps solution is rooted in the principle of subsidiarity, first advanced in the 1891 encyclical Rerum Novarum by Pope Leo XIII that social problems are best resolved by the smallest unit of society with the ability to resolve them.

In brief, bullying is a problem for parents, teachers, principals to deal with, and local cops and the school district if it becomes widespread.

This idea is consistent with the Republican idea of federalism that the national government should undertake those duties securing the borders, fighting the nations wars, creating a continental road and rail system that states alone cannot do.

Indeed, the nationalization of decision-making, the imposition of one-size-fits-all solutions to social problems, the court orders emanating from the ideology of judges to which there is no appeal that is behind the culture wars that may yet bring an end to this experiment in democratic rule.

Those factors are also among the primary causes of the fever of secessionism that is spreading all across Europe, and is now visible here.

Consider California. Democrats hold every state office, both Senate seats, two-thirds of both houses of the state legislature, 3 in 4 of the congressional seats. Hillary Clinton beat Trump 2-to-1 in California, with her margin in excess of 4 million votes.

Suddenly, California knows exactly how Marine Le Pen feels. And as she wants to Let France Be France, and leave the EU, as Brits did with Brexit, a movement is afoot in California to secede from the United States and form a separate nation.

California seceding sounds like a cause that could bring San Francisco Democrats into a grand alliance with Breitbart.

A new federalism a devolution of power and resources away from Washington and back to states, cities, towns and citizens, to let them resolve their problems their own way and according to their own principles may be the price of retention of the American Union.

Let California be California; let red state America be red state America.

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of the new book The Greatest Comeback: How Richard Nixon Rose From Defeat to Create the New Majority. To find out more about Patrick Buchanan and read features by other Creators writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators website at http://www.creators.com.

Originally posted here:
Patrick J. Buchanan: Is secession a solution to cultural war? - Tulsa World

Chevy Bolt And Tesla Model 3 Head For Culture Wars – Torque News

Both Tesla and Chevrolet are trying to head up the electric vehicle market, with the Chevy offerings being more of an everyman's vehicle up to now and Tesla being more in the luxury department. However, with the upcoming Tesla model 3 aiming to be a more affordable EV for the masses, it's likely that both companies are going to butt heads sooner rather than later.

It's something that is apparent to many an automotive writer as mentioned over at forbes.com with them highlighting how a visit to a few Chevy dealers didn't offer that many Volt or Bolts for sale, which concluded that without a larger portion of their EV vehicles in the marketing department, they may not be able to shift as many vehicles and spread the word by the time the Tesla model 3 appears at the end of the year.

There is in comparison an increasing number of Tesla vehicles on the road along with plenty of the likes of the Toyota Prius. This means that moving forward GM will have to start shifting more units and doing far more promotion or Tesla will possibly catch up, or even bypass them in the next five years.

The odd thing is that GM do have a head start in the market as the Volt has won lots of praise and the Bolt appealing to a Japanese and German car buying public at present. It's not that they are not shifting units as they are clearly selling in the likes of Los Angeles and other eco conscious states. However, GM need to start to target a wider reach as plenty of their competitors are gearing up for their next generation of EV vehicles. With the likes of Hyundai providing a wide range of electric and hybrid vehicles, Toyota and BMW also producing midpriced offerings, the competition is soon to hot up in the midpriced arena.

Tesla are also planning to move a lot of their model 3s in 2018 and with a planned price tag of $35,000 compared to the Bolt's $37,000, means the more affluent eco-conscious may just plump for a Model 3 over its competitor.

Here is the original post:
Chevy Bolt And Tesla Model 3 Head For Culture Wars - Torque News

What is the solution to the culture war? – Daily Corinthian (subscription)

As the culture war is about irreconcilable beliefs about God and man, right and wrong, good and evil, and is at root a religious war, it will be with us so long as men are free to act on their beliefs.

Yet, given the divisions among us, deeper and wider than ever, it is an open question as to how, and how long, we will endure as one people.

After World War II, our judicial dictatorship began a purge of public manifestations of the "Christian nation" that Harry Truman said we were.

In 2009, Barack Obama retorted, "We do not consider ourselves to be a Christian nation." Secularism had been enthroned as our established religion, with only the most feeble of protests.

One can only imagine how Iranians or Afghans would deal with unelected judges moving to de-Islamicize their nations. Heads would roll, literally.

Which bring us to the first culture war skirmish of the Trump era.

Taking sides with Attorney General Jeff Sessions against Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, the president rescinded the Obama directive that gave transgender students the right to use the bathroom of their choice in public schools. President Donald Trump sent the issue back to the states and locales to decide.

While treated by the media and left as the civil rights cause of our era, the "bathroom debate" calls to mind Marx's observation, "History repeats itself, first as tragedy, second as farce."

Can anyone seriously contend that whether a 14-year-old boy, who thinks he is a girl, gets to use the girls' bathroom is a civil rights issue comparable to whether African-Americans get the right to vote?

Remarkably, there was vigorous dissent, from DeVos, to returning this issue to where it belongs, with state and local officials.

After yielding on the bathroom question, she put out a statement declaring that every school in America has a "moral obligation" to protect children from bullying, and directed her Office of Civil Rights to investigate all claims of bullying or harassment "against those who are most vulnerable in our schools."

Now, bullying is bad behavior, and it may be horrible behavior.

But when did a Republican Party that believes in states rights decide this was a responsibility of a bureaucracy Ronald Reagan promised but failed to shut down? When did the GOP become nanny-staters?

Bullying is something every kid in public, parochial or private school has witnessed by graduation. While unfortunate, it is part of growing up.

But what kind of society, what kind of people have we become when we start to rely on federal bureaucrats to stop big kids from harassing and beating up smaller or weaker kids?

While the bathroom debate is a skirmish in the culture war, Trump's solution -- send the issue back to the states and the people there to work it out -- may point the way to a truce -- assuming Americans still want a truce.

For Trump's solution is rooted in the principle of subsidiarity, first advanced in the 1891 encyclical Rerum Novarum by Pope Leo XIII -- that social problems are best resolved by the smallest unit of society with the ability to resolve them.

In brief, bullying is a problem for parents, teachers, principals to deal with, and local cops and the school district if it becomes widespread.

This idea is consistent with the Republican idea of federalism -- that the national government should undertake those duties -- securing the borders, fighting the nation's wars, creating a continental road and rail system -- that states alone cannot do.

Indeed, the nationalization of decision-making, the imposition of one-size-fits-all solutions to social problems, the court orders emanating from the ideology of judges -- to which there is no appeal -- that is behind the culture wars that may yet bring an end to this experiment in democratic rule.

Those factors are also among the primary causes of the fever of secessionism that is spreading all across Europe, and is now visible here.

Consider California. Democrats hold every state office, both Senate seats, two-thirds of both houses of the state legislature, 3 in 4 of the congressional seats. Hillary Clinton beat Trump 2-to-1 in California, with her margin in excess of 4 million votes.

Suddenly, California knows exactly how Marine Le Pen feels.

And as she wants to "Let France Be France," and leave the EU, as Brits did with Brexit, a movement is afoot in California to secede from the United States and form a separate nation.

California seceding sounds like a cause that could bring San Francisco Democrats into a grand alliance with Breitbart.

A new federalism -- a devolution of power and resources away from Washington and back to states, cities, towns and citizens, to let them resolve their problems their own way and according to their own principles -- may be the price of retention of the American Union.

Let California be California; let red state America be red state America.

Patrick J. Buchanan is the author of the new book "The Greatest Comeback: How Richard Nixon Rose From Defeat to Create the New Majority."

Read more:
What is the solution to the culture war? - Daily Corinthian (subscription)