Archive for the ‘Culture Wars’ Category

Wright City schools manage to ‘stay above the fray’ of culture wars – Warren County Record

By Jason Koch, Editor

School districts across the state, including one that borders Warren County, have been dealing with culture war issues that take the focus off education.

But for the most part, Warren County hasnt had to deal with those issues.

I would say that largely we have not been confronted with that, Wright City R-II Superintendent Dr. Christopher Berger said. Have we had a little bit of it? Absolutely. St. Charles County is too close not to have some kind of residual effect to us.

The Wentzville School District has had a number of run-ins with Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey, including over allegedly hiding its deliberations on instituting a new transgender bathroom policy to avoid input and outrage from parents.

Bailey sued the district after two members of the school board emerged as whistleblowers and more than 40 members of the community filed formal complaints with the attorney generals office.

Parents have the right to know who is in the bathroom with their children. Members of the Wentzville School Board knowingly and purposefully denied parents that right when they shrouded the transgender student bathroom usage policy in secrecy, directly violating the Open Meetings Law, Bailey said.

Fortunately for Warren County, that type of issue hasnt arisen here.

I can say with 100 percent confidence that Wright City is not being confronted with that to the level, Berger said.

He credited the board of education as a big reason why.

I think our board is sensible to those things, Berger said.

He also believes that people may be moving out of St. Charles County to get away from those issues, and that the community doesnt want to see them come up in a place like Wright City.

Im optimistic that people coming to our community are looking to get away from that stuff, Berger said. Wright City, for example, just has a history of being above the fray on some of that stuff.

Berger was thankful for that because he said the culture war issues at hand can do serious damage to school districts.

Some of our schools in the area are just torn apart with those types of things splitting their board, he said.

About the author: Jason Koch is the editor of The Warren County Record, and covers local news and government for the newspaper. He has won multiple awards from both the Indiana and Illinois APME and from the Illinois Press Association. He can be reached at 636-456-6397 or at jason@warrencountyrecord.com

Go here to see the original:
Wright City schools manage to 'stay above the fray' of culture wars - Warren County Record

London Fidgets in the Culture Wars as Buenos Aires Reframes the Game – The New York Sun

Is there any cultural kerfuffle that the venerable British Museum cannot escape? Last month it was a packed fashion show in front of ancient Greek sculptures that touched off a firestorm. This week it is a collision of ancient Roman soldiers with the humorless hordes of Instagram, and results are not pretty.

To promote its new exhibition, Legion, museum marketers posted a message that read in part, Girlies, if youre single and looking for a man, this is your sign to go to the British Museums new exhibition, Life in the Roman Army, and walk around looking confused. Youre welcome. Ha ha, maybe.

As if the mere use of the word girlies by one of the worlds preeminent cultural institutions was not enough to get the ranks of academics and humorless Zoomers crying sexism, the cheeky suggestion that female museum-goers could be looking for something other than historical edification was enough to get them strenuously clutching at their pearls.

Londons Telegraph newspaper reported that the post was simply meant to poke fun at last years TikTok trend wherein, as the Daily Mail reported, women shared clips of themselves expressing bewilderment at how often the men in their lives think about the Roman Empire in some cases, more often than sex. Yet not everybody found it funny, though and (mercifully) not everyone uses TikTok.

A visiting research fellow at Kings College London, Claire Millington, commented on social media, Unrelenting fascist imagery and sexism dolloped on top.

The British Museum, recognizing a bad publicity move when it sees one, deleted the post and apologized: We are not actually suggesting that women need to look for dates or pretend to be stupid. Apologies to anyone who wasnt aware of the wider context who felt offended by this meme, a museum representative said.

That is something it did not do for what many consider to be a much greater cultural faux pas staging a fashion show in front of the Elgin Marbles, which Greek officials lambasted as demonstrating zero respect for Greek culture.

The Instagram post teasingly conflating Roman warriors with romance has as yet provoked no similar ire from Rome.

Under the stewardship of George Osbourne, a former chancellor of the Exchequer, the British Museum has been no stranger to controversy. Last year, say, the museum was found to have lost 2,000 items in its inventory. Mr. Osbourne has also come under fire for discussing a possible return of the Elgin Marbles to Athens discussions that apparently transpired without the sanction of Downing Street. What in the world was he thinking?

In respect of the outrage over the marketing of the ancient Roman show, should the scions of British culture really care? They might have no choice. A student at Londons prestigious Saint Martins School of Art told this correspondent: You would not believe the level of political correctness in this country right now, and its not only about what you can say or write. We are even coached on how we should frame sociologically the way we express ourselves artistically.

Freedom of expression appears to be having a better run in sunnier climes. The University of Florida has shuttered its chief diversity office and halted DEI-focused vendor contracts.

Far from Britain and a growing number of European countries that are flirting with the imposition of new rules on use of language in the name of gender equality, Argentina is pushing back against an overdose of political correctness as it applies to the Spanish lexicon.

Last week the Argentine president, Javier Milei, ordered the prohibition of so-called inclusive language by the national government. At a press conference his spokesman, Manuel Adorni, said that steps will be taken to prohibit inclusive language and everything related to gender perspective throughout the national public administration. He specified that the letter e, the @, and x will not be used along with the unnecessary inclusion of the feminine variation of a word in all public administration documents.

All nouns in Spanish have a gender, typically designated by the -o ending for masculine and the -a ending for feminine. Advocates of language inclusivity have concocted gender-neutral endings to make masculine words cover both sexes for example, todos (a masculine generic meaning everyone) would be made by such advocates into the gender neutral todxs, todes, or tod@s.

Mr. Milei will be having none of it. Last month, the ministry of defense stated that the use of so-called inclusive language did not correspond to the linguistic rules of Royal Spanish Academy and the Argentine Academy of Letters.

What do creeping curbs on truly free speech in Britain or for that matter, America have to do with the winds of change in Argentina? Not enough, at least not at present, boys and girlies.

Originally posted here:
London Fidgets in the Culture Wars as Buenos Aires Reframes the Game - The New York Sun

Sydney Sweeney’s ‘SNL’ Stint Has Become an Unlikely Focal Point in the Culture Wars – The Mary Sue

I spent over an hour scrolling through posts about Sydney Sweeneys SNL appearance on social media, and based on my findings, brain worms are a serious epidemic.

Sydney Sweeney has two Emmy nominations under her belt and starring roles in a couple of recent commercial Hollywood releases, making her an extremely normal pick to host SNL over the weekend. Online, the conversations about Sweeney are anything but. Unsurprisingly, the majority of posts about her appearance on SNL have more to do with her physical appearance than with her performance. Its something that Sweeney herself would acknowledge, as she did in her SNL monologue, and gamely laugh off to let you know shes in on the jokethe joke being that she is both conventionally attractive (i.e., hot) and a professional actor. And because having large breasts requires acknowledging them so that everyone (mostly heterosexual men) can shut up and move on. Except that a lot of people are not shutting up about it.

While Sweeney was experimenting with sketch comedyplaying a Gen Z social media savant, a server at Hooters, and a version of herself who lusts after Bowen Yangshe was being adopted by far-right conservatives and straight-up fascists as their new mascot. On the hellsite formerly known as Twitter, conservatives are hailing Sweeneys SNL hosting gig as a return to normalcy and a sign that society is ready to once again embrace traditional values. Some are less subtle than others in equating Sweeneys whiteness with traditional beauty, but the posts are all uniformly repulsive.

When one verified usera self-proclaimed journalist whose recent content consists of Michael Jackson apologia and an appearance on Alex Jones showposted that Sweeneys SNL episode has some of the most views in recent history (sure, but: citation needed?), the conservatives weaponized this non-news as proof that what real American people want is hot white ladies with big honkers, not fat women, transgenders, and circus freaks. And I am really sorry for retyping those words, but I promise you that after wasting more than an hour of my precious time on this planet searching Sydney Sweeney on X, its one of the least offensive versions of that particular sentiment.

Sweeneys SNL gig is also, according to multiple men who openly identify as white supremacists, proof that wokeness is dead. Whatever that means. Mostly it makes me think of a hypothetical progressive hetero teen boy writhing in agony as he attempts to reconcile his attraction to Sydney Sweeney with his belief in dismantling the prison industrial complex. And to that boy I say: you can like boobs and hate cops. These are not mutually exclusive. It also makes me think that Sweeney will soon be forced to issue a public statement denouncing white supremacy, not unlike Taylor Swift, who was also unwittingly adopted by neo-Nazis obsessed with her traditional features.

Meanwhile, in the left corner, the discourse is only slightly less brain-numbing and largely boils down to: SNLand by extension, society as a wholeneeds to stop objectifying hot actors, who are so much more than their looks. I agree that being hot isnt the only reason that most actors are famous, but unfortunately, we live in a society that prizes conventional beauty and actors are, like, 90% famous for being hot. There are plenty of people who are good at acting and will probably never be publicly recognized for it because audiences generally prefer when Hot People do it. The Sydney Sweeney Problem, as far as reasonable people are concerned, islike most thingsa systemic issue that needs to be addressed at the highest levels of Hollywood. If SNL wasnt the type of show to regularly platform racists, bigots, and ultra-conservative presidential candidates (sometimes all three!), I might expect them to Do Better.

Whether or not Sydney Sweeney was good on SNL (she was okay) isnt even a consideration in this discourse. Like her most recent filmsthe superhero misfire Madame Web and the off-base rom-com Anyone But YouSweeneys episode of SNL is popular for all the wrong reasons.

(featured image: NBC)

Have a tip we should know? [emailprotected]

Britt Hayes (she/her) is an editor, writer, and recovering film critic with over a decade of experience. She has written for The A.V. Club, Birth.Movies.Death, and The Austin Chronicle, and is the former associate editor for ScreenCrush. Britt's work has also been published in Fangoria, TV Guide, and SXSWorld Magazine. She loves film, horror, exhaustively analyzing a theme, and casually dissociating. Her brain is a cursed tomb of pop culture knowledge.

More:
Sydney Sweeney's 'SNL' Stint Has Become an Unlikely Focal Point in the Culture Wars - The Mary Sue

Are funerals the new culture war frontier? – The Catholic Weekly

St Patricks Cathedral, New York City. Photo: OSV NEWS/GREGORY A. SHEMITZ

A few weeks ago, a funeral was held for Cecilia Gentili in New Yorks St Patricks Cathedral.

The funeral was a cause of scandal and great controversy for several reasons.

First, Gentili was a publicly professed atheist whose stand-up comedy acts included jokes about blasphemous sex acts far too vulgar to put in print.

Second, Gentili spent a great number of years lobbying in favour of laws that the Church opposed, includingat the time of Gentilis deaththe full legalisation of prostitution and solicitation.

Third, one of the many eulogies at the funeral proclaimed Gentili (in Spanish and English) to be this whore, this great whore, Saint Cecilia, mother of all whores, and this was met by rapturous applause and a standing ovation from the congregation.

During the same eulogy, two male speakers engaged in a kiss while still on the sanctuary. Fourth, and I want to say least importantly in terms of scandal, Gentili was a biological man who had, for many years, identified as a woman.

In the days following, the cathedral dean, Fr Enrique Salvo, issued a statement saying that the cathedral only knew that family and friends were requesting a funeral Mass for a Catholic, and had no idea our welcome and prayer would be degraded in such a sacrilegious and deceptive way. He also confirmed a Mass of reparation had been offered.

Some have suggested the cathedral staff either must have known of Gentilis notoriety and did not think it a problem or were completely negligent in doing basic preparation for a funeral, such as meeting with the family and asking about the life and faith of the deceased. Whats more, an obituary published in the New York Times three days before the funeral would have given the cathedral enough information about the deceased. Those organising the funeral insist they were not deceptive, and simply wanted to hold the funeral for an icon in an iconic venue.

I imagine the truth of the situation lies somewhere in the middle. But rather than focusing what happened in this particular case, I think Gentilis funeral should be an invitation to the church more broadly to consider whether it is time to come up with some specific protocols and procedures in the event more funerals are used as the next frontier in the culture wars.

Even if a priest does his due diligence prior to a funeral, there is no guarantee that he isnt going to show up on the day to a church full of activists who are there not in prayer, but protest.

Like Gentilis funeral, it could be about transgender rights and sex work. Given the state of end-of-life laws here in Australia, it could be used as an event to reject church teaching on euthanasia and assisted suicide.

The priest celebrating Gentilis funeral realised something was amiss prior to the funeral commencing and made the decision that there would be no funeral Mass, just a simple funeral liturgy. It was prudent thinking on his part, but perhaps bishops should also speak with their priests about strategies they might use in such situations and give them the confidence that they will have his support if they need to use them.

Perhaps, like in Gentilis case, a short liturgy might be used. This would not prevent a private Mass for the repose of the soul of the deceased being offered later.

Maybe Mass might still be celebrated but Holy Communion not distributed if things seem amiss or go awryif such a thing is allowed under liturgical and canonical norms.

Maybe, when a funeral is requested and the deceased or their family is not known to the parish, some additional questions might be asked, or eulogies omitted, minimised or pre-submitted. This might especially be necessary for funerals requested at the diocesan cathedral or other places of significance.

This isnt about denying people the graces of a funeral Mass. I think the church should be generous with funerals because we are all sinners in need of Gods mercy. But this generosity shouldnt extend to those who reject the existence of God and who instead want to use our churches and clergy as props in a narcissistic pantomime, nor for those who want to co-opt our liturgies as weapons in the culture wars.

See the rest here:
Are funerals the new culture war frontier? - The Catholic Weekly

Top 10 stories that shaped 2023: Trumps mug, Vogtles sticker shock and raging culture wars – Georgia Recorder

The jailhouse booking of a former president. The death of the only Georgian to ever serve as first lady. The first kilowatts of energy cranked out of the beleaguered Plant Vogtle nuclear expansion project.

These and other stories left a mark on the world of Georgia politics this year, whether in jaw-dropping fashion or through the void left behind. Others are notable simply because they represent the smaller, incremental twists that simply moved a long-running story on to a new chapter.

So before we move on to 2024, lets take a look back at the stories that made 2023 the year it was.

Georgia found itself back at the center of national politics in August when a grand jury indicted former President Donald Trump and 18 of his allies on racketeering and conspiracy charges for interfering in the 2020 election.

The grand jury indictments and the subsequent circus-like parade of surrenders at the Fulton County Jail on Rice Street also yielded the only mugshot of the former president, which is also the only booking photo made of any U.S. president.

Four of Trumps co-defendants have since accepted plea deals and agreed to testify at trial.

Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and Trumps legal team remain at odds as the lead prosecutor seeks to have Trump and the 14 remaining co-defendants stand trial together in this coming August.

Trump, the GOPs frontrunner for the 2024 presidential nomination, along with ex-Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani and Mark Meadows, former White House chief of staff, are accused of making baseless claims of massive voting fraud while orchestrating a multi-state plot to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

Trumps attorney Steve Sadow contends that the potential timing of an August trial several months before the Nov. 5 election would amount to the worst example of election interference in the nations history.

Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee has indicated he would prefer to divide the defendants into smaller groups because of the logistical challenges of a trial that prosecutors predict will involve 150 witnesses taking the stand over the course of four months.

Prosecutors have struck plea deals with four codefendants, including attorneys Jenna Ellis, Kenneth Chesebro, and Sidney Powell and Atlanta bail bondsman Scott Hall. A number of legal and political experts predict that the Fulton prosecutors will continue to negotiate plea agreements with many of the remaining co-defendants, and that their testimony will be used to strengthen the cases against Trump and his top allies.

Admirers of former President Jimmy Carter and former first lady Rosalynn Carter started the year worried about the former presidents health after it was announced in February that he had entered hospice care at his home in Plains.

But by the end of the year, they were grieving the loss of Rosalynn Carter, who died in November at the age of 96. She was diagnosed with dementia in May.

Rosalynn Carter was remembered as her husbands closest adviser Jimmy Carter called her an equal partner in everything I ever accomplished as well as celebrated for own rich legacy championing mental health, caregiving and womens rights.

The former first lady was honored with a multi-day remembrance tour that included a tribute ceremony in Atlanta that was attended by four living former first ladies and sitting first lady Jill Biden, as well as President Joe Biden and former president Bill Clinton.

Jimmy Carter attended the tribute ceremony and the funeral services held at Maranatha Baptist Church. It was the first time he had been seen in public since September when the couple made a surprise appearance at the Plains Peanut Festival. They had been married for 77 years.

Well-wishers stood watch all along the route of her motorcade to pay their respects.

Georgias controversial six-week abortion ban survived its first legal test in the wake of last years U.S. Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. Wade.

A group of health care providers and abortion rights advocates filed a new lawsuit in state court in July 2022 after Georgias law was allowed to take effect last summer after the Dobbs decision, ending an earlier challenge in federal court.

They argued that Georgias 2019 law was invalid because it was passed when Roe v. Wade was still the law of the land and insisted that lawmakers should be required to pass a new law in todays climate.

Fulton County Superior Court Judge Robert C. I. McBurney agreed, ruling the restrictions plainly unconstitutional when they were created. But the Georgia Supreme Court didnt buy that, rejecting that argument with a 6-1 decision in October.

But other parts of the same case are still pending in the lower court. The lawsuit also argues that Georgias strict abortion restrictions violate the state constitutions rights to privacy and equal protection.

A federal judges ruling in October struck down Georgias political maps and pulled lawmakers back to Atlanta for a quick special session that wrapped up in early December.

District Court Judge Steve C. Jones threw out the congressional and legislative maps drawn in 2021 ruling that they diluted the voting power of Black Georgians.

Jones concluded that the GOP-drawn maps violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, which bars practices and procedures that discriminate on the basis of race and had just survived a test before the U.S. Supreme Court this year.

Lawmakers passed new maps with party-line votes that Republicans say responds to the judges call to create new majority Black districts. But Democrats argued their GOP colleagues failed to address the judges concerns and only played a shell game with non-white voters.

The ruling had been expected to lead to Democratic gains since Black Georgians have historically backed Democrats at high rates. But the maps that emerged from this years special session would give up some GOP-controlled ground in the state House but otherwise largely maintain the current partisan balance.

A post-session hearing was held last week and Jones dampened hopes of the challengers who had argued the judges initial ruling applied to minority opportunity districts that factored in coalitions of Black, Hispanic and Asian voters, as opposed to counting only the Black population.

Jones said in court that he would narrowly focus on protecting the rights of Black voters. He also said he would render a decision very quickly.

Four years after first being announced, the governors plan to slightly expand Medicaid eligibility for low-income adults who satisfy certain activity requirements was launched in July.

But the program has been off to a slow start. As of mid-December, 2,344 people had enrolled in Georgia Pathways to Coverage.

The governor unveiled the proposal in 2019 after a competitive election that focused in part on full Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act, which could cover hundreds of thousands of people. Today, Georgia is one of 10 states that have not fully expanded Medicaid.

In Georgia, a low-income adult must complete 80 hours of work or other activities every month to qualify and then keep their health care coverage under the new program.

The programs launch was delayed by the Biden administration, which pushed back on the work requirement, but Georgia officials were able to proceed after successfully suing in federal court.

The rollout is now happening as all states check the eligibility of everyone currently covered by Medicaid as part of the end of a pandemic-era protection. Georgia has attracted national attention for having the third highest number of children who have lost coverage during the process.

Georgia Power ratepayers will be responsible for a $7.6 billion bill for the construction of two nuclear reactors built at Plant Vogtle located southeast of Augusta.

The financial agreement for the snakebit nuclear project was approved Dec. 19 in an unanimous vote by the Georgia Public Service Commission that calls for the utility company to cover at least $2.6 billion of an expected $10 billion in construction and capital costs spent on the Vogtle project.

Vogtle has remained a major source of contention and frustration as the costs ballooned to more than double the price initially forecast for a project thats taking 14 years to complete.

The two Vogtle expansion units are the first nuclear reactors to be built in the U.S. in more than 30 years, and account for the latest in a series of rate increases Georgia Power customers will continue to pay in the coming months.

Georgia Power and other Vogtle promoters tout the benefits of nuclear power as a provider of a reliable and zero-carbon energy supply for the next 60 to 80 years. A number of utility analysts and clean energy and consumer advocates have long argued that the projects benefits will not outweigh the ballooning costs customers will be stuck with in the long haul.

The average Georgia Power homeowner has been paying an extra $5 per month since Unit 3 began operating this summer and will begin paying an additional $9 monthly once Unit 4 comes online. Georgia Power officials predict that the final reactor will be fully operational within the first several months of 2024.

Construction on Vogtle has been severely hampered by technical issues, worker shortages, a strike, and the bankruptcy of its original contractor Westinghouse Electric Co. in 2017.

Patients with serious health maladies celebrated this year when state-approved medical cannabis dispensaries began opening their doors, ending years of suffering without medicine or obtaining it outside the letter of the law.

Georgia law allows people with certain diagnoses to sign up for a state-issue card allowing them to possess low THC oil.

But some patients and caregivers initially reported problems getting on the list, and a plan to become the first state to allow pharmacies to dispense medical cannabis products appears scuttled after the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency warned Georgia pharmacies against breaking federal laws by dispensing THC.

Transgender children and families lost their right to get hormone therapy in Georgia this year after the Legislature banned the practice on party lines.

Doctors typically recommend a course of treatment for minors experiencing gender dysphoria that can include social transitioning, as in changing ones name or pronouns or hormone treatment, in which patients take testosterone or estrogen to match their gender identity.

The bill also outlaws sex reassignment surgery, which advocates say is not performed on minors.

A judge temporarily blocked the law as a lawsuit moves forward, but reversed that decision after the 11th Circuit Court issued a contradictory ruling in Alabama.

When state lawmakers kicked off this years legislative session in January, the gavel was in the hands of new leaders in both chambers.

In the House, some history was also being made. Milton Republican state Rep. Jan Jones, who is the speaker pro tem, greeted lawmakers on their first day as the first woman to ever serve as speaker in Georgia. She had become speaker after the unexpected death of Speaker David Ralston in late 2022.

Then House Majority Leader Jon Burns would go on to become the speaker, and as he was settling in, newly elected Lt. Gov. Burt Jones was finding his own groove presiding over the state Senate across the state Capitol building.

To add another wrinkle: As new legislative leaders were taking the helm, a whopping 53 new lawmakers were also thrown into the mix of an increasingly diverse General Assembly.

This January promises to bring more seasoned top leaders and lawmakers, even if just slightly so.

Proponents say the proposed Atlanta Public Safety Training Center will allow police to better serve their community. Opponents deride the project as Cop City and say it will further militarize police and make them more effective at killing minorities.

State leadership is strongly on the pro-side, which could manifest during the 2024 session as money for the endeavor or new laws aimed at violent demonstrations. Dozens of activists now face racketeering charges in relation to their opposition, and a plan to put the center to a citywide vote is in legal limbo as the sides argue over the validity of petition signatures.

The issue already landed before lawmakers during the brief special legislative session held so Georgias political maps could be redrawn. GOP leaders pushed a nonbinding resolution expressing support, forcing lawmakers to take a position on the controversial project. In the House, it passed 144-5; in the Senate, the vote was 48 to 5.

GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX

SUBSCRIBE

Read the original post:
Top 10 stories that shaped 2023: Trumps mug, Vogtles sticker shock and raging culture wars - Georgia Recorder