Archive for the ‘Culture Wars’ Category

Analysis: While Starmer Jokes About Star Wars, Johnson Is Stoking Up The Culture Wars – HuffPost UK

Being called boring by his own shadow cabinet appears to have really got under Keir Starmers skin.

The Labour leader was throwing culture references around like confetti in PMQs, one minute name-checking Obi-Wan Kenobi, the next going on about Love Island.

In truth, the jokes fell rather flat, but you could hardly fault him for effort.

But while Starmer wanted to talk about Star Wars, it was the UKs culture wars that Boris Johnson wanted to stoke.

Rail strikes, Rwanda deportation flights and Brexit were all given an airing by the prime minister, for the simple reason that he - rightly - believes they make things electorally tricky for Labour.

So next weeks planned walkout by members of the RMT are Labours strikes because the opposition cant bring themselves to criticise a trade union.

On Rwanda, the PM said Labour were on the side of the people traffickers who would risk peoples lives at sea because they criticise the governments policy of sending asylum seekers on a one-way journey to east Africa.

And on Brexit, Johnson said that given half a chance, Labour would take the UK back into the European Union. Nonsense, of course, but it plays very well in the Red Wall.

After narrowly escaping an attempt by his own MPs to turf him out office, the prime minister clearly believes that the best way to save his job is to turn politics into an Us versus Them battle.

It worked for him in 2019 and, he clearly believes, it will prove fruitful again at the next election, should he still be Conservative leader then.

Until Starmer comes up with plausible positions on the most divisive issues in British politics, Johnson is right to feel optimistic.

More here:
Analysis: While Starmer Jokes About Star Wars, Johnson Is Stoking Up The Culture Wars - HuffPost UK

History shows those who have the will to win will win – Monroe Evening News

Charles W. Milliken| The Daily Telegram

As the Russian invasion of Ukraine settles into a slugfest in the east of the country, headlines appear suggesting many difficulties. There is a split within NATO as to how much support is appropriate to give to Ukraine. Weapons of sufficient range and lethality to allow the Ukrainian army to defeat the Russians will only prolong the war.

In the U.S., there is a political segment wondering why we have ever helped the Ukrainians at all. How does saving Ukraine from being dominated by the Russians serve American interests? Why are we sending billions to Ukraine while we have shortages of baby formula? Besides all this, if we give the Ukrainians what they need, might not that force Putin into a humiliating corner, and then who knows what he might do with, for instance, nukes?

This all sounds familiar. When Chamberlin went to Munich, he wondered why endanger the peace in Europe by denying Hitler what he wanted in Czechoslovakia? That would mean war, and Chamberlin wanted peace in our time. After all, Hitler only wanted the Sudetenland, where many Germans lived, supposedly oppressed by the Czech majority.

Putin, perhaps, only really wants a couple Eastern provinces, and the south coast, where many ethnically Russians live, oppressed by the neo-Nazi Ukrainians, leaving the rest of the country to its own devices. It can be swallowed up later, the principle of rewarding aggression having beenestablished. Did Hitler stop with the Sudentland? Of course not. After shortly swallowing up the rest of Czechoslovakia, he also took a chunk of Lithuania in March 1939. Who cares about Lithuania?

England and France were riven by fear, and the U.S. stood aloof in our continental isolation. Why should we get involved in another European intertribal spat? I think we all know how that worked out.

Once we were in, however, we were in it to win it.There was no talk of giving Hitler, Tojoand Mussolini an exit ramp.There was no talk of prolonging the war by pouring massive amounts of American blood and treasure into the fight. There was only one exit ramp for the dictators, and that was unconditional surrender.That was the end of them. Well, not quite.Stalin was left standing in a deal with the devil.

After World War II, winning ceased to be an option.Korea was a stalemate, mostly because of fear of Russian nukes if we went too far.Vietnam was a defeat after years of wasted blood and treasure because we did not have the fortitude to win it.Russian nukes, again.The first Gulf War was fought to a tactical victory, and strategic defeat as Saddam Hussein was left in power.It took another set of wars which we were not willing to see to complete victory, thus the humiliation in Afghanistan.

If the history of the world teaches us anything, I think it is that those who have the will to win and the means will win. Hitler had the will, but not the means. To switch to domestic politics, how many of the culture wars have been won by the side with the will to win? The losers in these wars are those who were willing to compromise, to be bi-partisan,to be reasonable, to understand the other side. If wars arent worth winning, why fight at all? Surrender immediately and save the cost.

If, in the current situation, we do not wish to reward Russian aggression, the path forward is very simple. Arm the Ukrainians to the teeth. Break the Russian blockade of Odessa in the Black Sea. Millions are facing hunger, or worse, if Ukrainian grain is not exported.The Russian Black Sea fleet couldnt stand up to our Navy for five minutes, and they know it. If, after that, the Ukrainians cannot expel the Russians, then we have a different and far more serious problem.

Concluding thoughts: If evil is given an off ramp,it will win; compromise is just another word for surrender on the installment plan.

Charles Milliken is a professor emeritus after 22 years of teaching economics and related subjects at Siena Heights University. He can be reached at milliken.charles@gmail.com.

See the rest here:
History shows those who have the will to win will win - Monroe Evening News

GOPs violent, expanding war on LBGTQ kids should make you think about 1930s Germany | Will Bunch – The Philadelphia Inquirer

Ive been meaning to write a column on the growing threat and reality of violence to Americas LGBTQ community posed by right-wing rhetoric and politics, but its proved a difficult piece to write. Not because the culture wars around sexuality and gender are complicated they can be, although the notion of loving all people for who they are is pretty simple but because new, outrageous incidents keep topping the ones I planned to write about.

Literally as I hit the send button on a note to my editors about this column, it was reported that police in Baltimore are investigating multiple fires on a city street as a possible hate crime which sent three people to the hospital in which a Pride flag celebrating LGBTQ rights was reportedly set ablaze.

Officials there had good reason to be alarmed, after this weekends widely reported incident in which 31 members of the white nationalist Patriot Front the weird khaki-wearing extremists who marched through Philadelphia last July 4 were arrested in Coeur dAlene, Idaho, after piling into a rented U-Haul truck armed with riot gear, apparently with the goal of violently disrupting the annual Pride event underway there.

This occurred right after several members of another well-known, violent extremist group, the Proud Boys some of them wearing T-shirts with images of AK-47s showed up at the San Lorenzo, Calif., public library to disrupt and shut down a drag queen story time childrens book event, shouting homophobic slurs. As the author and transgender advocate Parker Molloy wrote in a recent newsletter, both the Idaho and California events had been targeted by a social media feed called Libs of TikTok that has developed a huge following on the right with some 1.2 million Twitter followers and attracted much controversy.

Wrote Molloy: Things are getting really bad for LGBTQ people out there, and I just dont see how itll get any better, especially in the short term. Republicans and their allies in right-wing media are going on the attack. Their goal is to create reasonable-sounding arguments (No, you see, I just really care about fairness in womens sports!), and then use that to wipe out LGBTQ people.

I dont think Molloy is unduly alarmist. To the contrary, its only getting worse by the day. We are now seeing a dangerous loop in which the most extreme voices on the far right led, ironically, by so-called pastors are making genocidal comments about our brothers and sisters in the LBGTQ community. In Americas statehouses, Republican lawmakers who claim to be worried about real-life problems like inflation are instead spending all of their time translating hate speech into proposed laws that would make societal pariahs out of transgender kids. In chat rooms and militia training sessions, the soldiers of extremism are on the brink of taking all of this to the next blood-drenched level.

The increasingly dangerous, violent rhetoric has been amplified to 11 by the likes of Mark Burns, a prominent South Carolina televangelist and Donald Trump enthusiast who just ran for Congress (and lost, thankfully) and who said this month that LGBTQ-friendly schoolteachers are a national security threat guilty of treason, which should be punishable by execution. In Idaho, where that Pride parade violence was narrowly averted, Pastor Joe Jones of Shield of Faith Baptist Church in Boise kicked things up a notch by declaring in a video that subsequently went viral: God told the nation that he ruled: Put them to death. Put all queers to death.

In a healthy democracy truly committed to liberty and human rights, our elected leaders would be condemning these shocking calls for violence. Instead, Republican lawmakers are working overtime to figure out how to channel this alarming new far-right zeitgeist into the fake respectability of law and not just in the blood-red states of the old Confederacy. It was jarring to see Pennsylvanias GOP-led legislature immediately after the mass shooting in Uvalde, the all-too-real national security threat to our kids squelch any meaningful debate on gun control while the state Senate was instead passing a blanket ban on transgender youth in school sports.

We are in a day when good is called evil and evil is called good, claimed one of the bills cosponsors, State Sen. Doug Mastriano, who happens to be the current Republican nominee for governor. If he wins and a major new poll has Mastriano within the margin of error (such a fitting phrase) of defeating Democrat Josh Shapiro he would surely sign this legislation into law in 2023. As Ive written previously in this space, homophobia especially against Pennsylvanias transgender community is a driving force of Mastrianos movement and, increasingly, the Republican Party writ large. And its a matter of time before this gets someone killed.

READ MORE: Homophobia is Mastrianos driving force | Will Bunch Newsletter

This story is understandably shocking to many Americans. When the Supreme Court made same-sex marriage the law of the land with its 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges ruling, it felt to many like the final chapter in an American feel-good story of increasing tolerance that would only get better with the ascension of open-minded new generations. Instead, the epilogue has been a violent wrenching backward of the arc of a moral universe.

In focusing on laws like transgender sports bans which affect a handful of kids, in a matter that can and should be handled by sports regulatory bodies, and not the stuff of state legislation or Floridas notoriously and now-copied Dont Say Gay law, the Republican Party is sending a message that is both heartbreakingly cruel to the humans directly affected but also meant to intimidate all people it wants to keep on societys margin. We have a word for when this type of inhumane bullying becomes the governing philosophy, and its time to start using it.

That word is fascism.

This American version of an authoritarian dystopia wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross, as long predicted is numbingly similar to the worlds past versions of autocracy, with brutal anti-LGBTQ discrimination so often on the cutting edge for movements also cloaked in white supremacy, patriarchy, and other forms of repression.

The parallels between what happened in Germany in the 1920s when the short-lived Weimar Republic saw a period of liberalizing and openness around human sexuality and the 1930s, when the brutal repression of Adolf Hitlers Nazi Party took root, should be alarming to Americans in the 2020s. In May 1933, right after Hitler took power, students in clean white shirts (shades of todays Patriot Front) marched on Berlins Institute for Sexual Research a bastion of Weimar liberalism which was a prelude to its library being burned down and the arrest of its leader.

By the mid-1930s, Hitlers Gestapo had formed a unit to arrest gay men under a previously not-enforced law, netting some 8,500 prisoners. As Europe devolved into the horrors of World War II, its known that thousands of men accused of homosexuality perhaps as many as 15,000 did not survive the Nazi death camps. The pink triangle that the imprisoned were forced to wear would later be adopted as a symbol of resistance by the movement for gay rights, which should not minimize the horrors that occurred under this image. They were mechanically raped, castrated, favored for medical experiments and murdered for guards sadistic pleasure even when they were not sentenced for liquidation, Case Western Reserve University historian John Broich wrote for Newsweek.

It cant happen here? Its already starting to happen right now, and its happening in conjunction with so many other warning signs of creeping fascism: daily, stunning revelations of a failed putsch that occurred not inside a beer hall but at the U.S. Capitol, the rise of a political class wedded to a Big Lie that could end democratic elections, and the rise of a Christian nationalism that is converting The Handmaids Tale into a work of nonfiction. Every days headlines scream out for the truth, that this is Nazi-type stuff.

And its spiraling out of control in June, a month for remembering the courageous 1969 pioneers of Stonewall, but also the horrors of the backlash that erupted in a hail of gunfire at the Pulse nightclub in 2016. Some 53 years after Greenwich Village and just six years after Orlando, America is on the precipice. There is still barely time to grab the arc of the moral universe back from the men in crisp white shirts trying to break it.

READ MORE: SIGN UP: The Will Bunch Newsletter

Read the original here:
GOPs violent, expanding war on LBGTQ kids should make you think about 1930s Germany | Will Bunch - The Philadelphia Inquirer

New VISIONS 2022 Report from Future Commerce Reveals Trends Shaping the World Around Us – Retail Dive

WEST PALM BEACH, Fla.

Sacraments of commerce, brands as cults, and trolls are the winners of the culture wars.

Future Commerce, the media company that offers strategic advice to retailers seeking to take their businesses to the next level, released the latest edition of its annual survey and report, VISIONS 2022. This years report analyzes insights collected from 1,000 consumers across the US from May 5-12th, 2022 and looks at the three areas where the greatest shifts are occurring: consumer, culture and modernity.

The report uncovers eight key themes for brands to be aware of, among them include:

Homogenization of Experiences: blahification of online shopping

Consumers see little functional difference between eCommerce sites that have comparable offerings. The majority 64% agree its rare to come across a website that feels unique or has unexpected functionality. Were living in a world where eCommerce is boring. How did we get this way? Look no further than technology. The SaaS era and cloud platforms limit the quantity and quality of decisions that marketers and technologists can make. Their only way to stand out is to become exceptional at selling, or deliver quality products. But theres hope: Dork Mode the anti-design pattern can turn off the mundane and engage the unexpected.

Celebration of Insincerity: Trolls are Winning the Culture War

Social media is a place where people want the world to think that theyre better people than they actually are. One in three respondents say they frequently post images of things they dont own on social media to make their lives look more interesting/appealing, and 50% are more likely to post than to donate to the Green New Deal/Climate Change, Blue Lives Matter, Blood:Water, or Defund the Police.

Whats more, 70% agree that everyone posts/shares things online that they wouldnt in real life. The implication of these views? Internet culture dictates that spectators lose and participants win, but theres a catch: highly nuanced ideas must be boiled down to a meme. Algorithmic timelines make matters worse, as AI indexes engagement over enlightenment. Meme culture, hype culture, reply-guys, and online hero worship are symptomatic of a broader problem we live in a post-sincere world.

In commerce, the ones hitting the high notes are the brands catering their voices to specific channels e.g. the NFL (and its teams) rebranded their TikTok accounts in solidarity with creator Emily Zugays sarcastic redesigns, replete with intentional misspellings. These brands are winning favor with consumers, as 58% say they love when brands have an irreverent tone in ads.

Sacraments of Commerce: Brands as the New Religion

As a society were more secular, yet our need for identity, community, meaning and collective purpose are still with us (44% of all survey respondents said theyve become more superstitious, and 89% of consumers say theyve started and maintained some new rituals since the pandemic began in 2020).

For many, commerce is filling the spiritual void. At the top is our new God: AI. Algorithms bestow blessings and inflict punishment based on a reality that AI manipulates. Brand engagements are secular sacraments, which makes sense now that people have become brands, while brands are personified as corporations endowed with liberties. Meanwhile, brands fill the gap that religion has left behind, nurturing their cult fans.

Were in the midst of the greatest technological shift in a generation. The town square is now fully digitized, our every interaction is quantified and commerce stands at the center of it all. VISIONS isnt a trends report as much as a recognition of the underlying psychological and philosophical ideas that are shaping the world around us. explains Phillip Jackson, Future Commerce Co-Founder.

In addition to this report, Future Commerce will launch a 16-episode podcast and video series, exploring the underlying psychological and philosophical ideas that are shaping the world around us. It will welcome influential guests and industry leaders such as Mike Edmonds, VP Commerce at Microsoft, Elise DeCamp, Founder of Toki NFT, Miya Knights, retail technology author, and many more to discuss the practical application of the insights found within the report.

The VISIONS 2022 report, podcast, and video series can be found here.

###

Future Commerce is a media company that is dedicated to the discovery and exchange of ideas that lead to future-altering outcomes for us and the world around us. It offers a newsletter and podcasts specific to the world of retail and eCommerce, trusted by nearly 35K people on a monthly basis. Learn more at http://www.futurecommerce.fm.

See the article here:
New VISIONS 2022 Report from Future Commerce Reveals Trends Shaping the World Around Us - Retail Dive

The divorcee vs. the diplomat- POLITICO – POLITICO

By POLITICO MAGAZINE

06/17/2022 09:00 AM EDT

Updated 06/19/2022 08:05 AM EDT

Illustration by Jordan Kay

It was 1892, and James G Blaine Sr. was about to charge into the greatest political battle of his life just not the battle he expected. Blaine was challenging President Benjamin Harrison for the Republican nomination, but his true opponent that election year would be an aspiring actress named Mary Nevins Blaine.

At the age of 19, after an 18-day courtship, she eloped with James 17-year-old son, Jamie, who he described as the the most helpless, least responsible of his children. When things inevitably turned sour, she sought a divorce which threw her, her family and Blaines political campaign into the epicenter of the turn-of-the-century culture wars.

In this excerpt from her book, The Divorce Colony: How Women Revolutionized Marriage and Found Freedom on the American Frontier, April White tells an historic tale that sounds straight out of the social media era complete with private investigators, press frenzies, political strivers and PR battles that pitted a resourceful young woman against a seasoned elder statesman.

[He has a] Ph. D. degree from Achesons College of Cowardly Communist Containment and is a weakling, a waster, and a small-calibered Truman.

Can you guess who said this about Democratic presidential candidate Adlai Stevenson in 1952? Scroll to the bottom for the answer.*

Kimberly Scott opened Chronic City in Detroit. But just six months later, she locked the doors to her business for good. | Sylvia Jarrus for POLITICO

Detroits Weed Woes In February 2021, Kimberly Scott finally achieved her dream of opening a medical marijuana business in Detroit. She saw it as much more than just a place to buy weed it was also a blow against the decades-long War on Drugs that treated cannabis as a menacing scourge and disproportionately targeted Black people like her.

But weeks passed and then months and the license promised by the city never came. Struggling to compete with recreational weed businesses near Detroit, Scott locked the doors to her business for good, just six months after she opened them.

In this deep-dive report, POLITICO Cannabis Editor Paul Demko examines the judicial battles that have stopped Detroit from launching a recreational market that gives preferential treatment to long-time residents or people living in areas disproportionately targeted by criminal enforcement. The result, he writes, is a still-born market where everyone is failing.

Politico illustration / AP Photo / iStock

The General and the FBI Its a classic Beltway scandal: Retired Marine General John Allen resigned as president of the Brookings Institute this week over accusations that he lobbied for the government of Qatar.

Despite Allens 2019 announcement that Brookings would phase out money from non-democracies Qatar was one of its largest donors it turns out that his entire run atop the capitals leading liberal think-tank was shadowed by a trip he took to the emirate just months before ascending to the presidency. Michael Schaffer reports in this weeks Capital City column.

Fifty years after a group of well-dressed burglars were arrested in the offices of the Democratic National Committee at the Watergate, there's still a lot we don't know. Heres how to seem up to speed on all the wild circumstances surrounding the break-in. (From magazine contributor Garrett Graff)

- Sorry, Nixon defenders. Nixon probably didn't know anything about the DNC burglary in advance. BUT he's on tape repeatedly ordering another break-in, the year before, when he wanted to firebomb and burglarize the Brookings Institution.

- I mean, yeah, retaping the door at the Watergate might have been a mistake by James McCord, but maybe it was part of a CIA operation to sabotage the burglary.

- You can always whisper, conspiratorially, Don't tell me it was just a bugging operation. Since he died last year, though, we'll never know why burglar Eugenio Martinez had a key to Ida Wells' desk at the DNC.

- You, like the rest of D.C., are glad to see Martha Mitchell finally getting her due. Maybe if America had listened when she said Nixon's goons kidnapped and drugged her after the burglary, his presidency would have unraveled faster.

Illustration by Tyler Comrie

Experimenting on Elites Railing against the elites has become a popular sport on both the left and the right. The two sides might see politics in radically different ways, but they share a common presumption: To understand whats gone wrong with American democracy, you have to understand how elites think.

But how, exactly, can we get inside the heads of Americas political elite? Thats what POLITICOs Ian Ward asked political scientists Joshua Kertzer and Jonathan Renshon, authors of a new paper on the use of elite experiments or randomized studies using elite subjects to study the decision-making processes of political leaders. How do elites weigh their options? What do they get wrong? And how on earth do we fix it?

39 percent of voters dont know which political party Matthew McConaughey favors. Twenty-seven percent believe hes a Democrat, while 18 percent think hes a Republican and 16 percent have him pegged as an independent.

Every week, The Weekend inserts a question in a POLITICO/Morning Consult poll and see what the crosstabs yield. Got any suggestions? Email us at [emailprotected].

When D.C. Paid Reparations to Enslavers In April 1862, three years before the emancipation of the last enslaved people in Texas now celebrated on Juneteenth, Congress passed a law to free all enslaved Black people in Washington D.C. Barely a year after the start of the Civil War, President Lincoln intended to set an antislavery example in the nations capital.

The emancipation effort even included reparations just not for formerly enslaved Black people. In D.C.'s emancipation, enslavers were paid significant compensation for their lost property, writes Kris Manjapra in this weeks History Dept. The freed Black people not only received no reparations but also experienced ongoing governmental neglect and exclusions, [ensuring] ... the disadvantages of slavery would continue to be passed down, not ended, after slaverys end.

Richard Nixon Presidential Library and Museum

Floral arrangements sent to Richard Nixon after his resignation on August 8, 1974, following the Watergate scandal. The bouquets sat in a storage room in Nixons Western White House, San Clemente, California, two days after his announcement of his departure.

I have never been a quitter. To leave office before my term is completed is abhorrent to every instinct in my body. But as President, I must put the interest of America first, he said during a televised address announcing his resignation.

Despite his 24 percent approval rate at the time, media reactions to the speech were generally favorable: Dignity was emphasized, wrote journalist Fred Emery.

**Who Dissed? answer: Stevenson was pummeled with these quotes from then-vice presidential candidate Richard Nixon before he was pummeled again by Dwight Eisenhower in the election. Achesons College was a reference to Dean Acheson, the Secretary of State under President Truman who had been targeted as a Communist by Joseph McCarthy. Stevenson had choice words for Nixon, too, saying he was the kind of politician who would cut down a redwood tree and then mount the stump and make a speech for conservation.

CORRECTION: An earlier version of POLITICO Weekend misspelled Ida Wells' name.

View post:
The divorcee vs. the diplomat- POLITICO - POLITICO