Mediaboss Marketing

May 17, 2023 by Diana Ambolis

105

Blockchain technology has emerged as a transformative force, promising decentralized, secure, and transparent solutions across various industries. However, one of the key challenges faced by blockchain networks is scalability. As the adoption of blockchain applications grows, it becomes crucial to explore emerging trends and innovations that address scalability concerns. This article delves into the latest

Blockchain technology has emerged as a transformative force, promising decentralized, secure, and transparent solutions across various industries. However, one of the key challenges faced by blockchain networks is scalability. As the adoption of blockchain applications grows, it becomes crucial to explore emerging trends and innovations that address scalability concerns. This article delves into the latest developments and provides a glimpse into the future of blockchain scalability.

Sharding is an innovative approach to improve blockchain scalability. By dividing the network into smaller, more manageable shards, each capable of processing transactions independently, sharding allows for parallel processing. This approach significantly enhances the throughput and scalability of blockchain networks by enabling multiple transactions to occur simultaneously across different shards. Projects like Ethereum 2.0 are actively working on implementing sharding to achieve higher scalability while maintaining security and decentralization.

Layer-two scaling solutions aim to enhance scalability by offloading certain transaction processing tasks from the main blockchain. State channels and payment channels are examples of layer-two solutions that enable off-chain transactions while leveraging the security of the underlying blockchain. These solutions reduce the burden on the main blockchain, resulting in improved transaction throughput, lower fees, and faster confirmation times. Projects like the Lightning Network for Bitcoin and Raiden Network for Ethereum demonstrate the potential of layer-two solutions in achieving high scalability.

Sidechains enable the creation of parallel chains that are connected to the main blockchain, allowing for the execution of specialized tasks and facilitating interoperability. By moving specific transactions or smart contracts to sidechains, the main blockchain is relieved of congestion, leading to enhanced scalability. Moreover, sidechains can be designed with specific features and consensus mechanisms optimized for particular use cases, providing greater flexibility for developers and users. Prominent examples include the Liquid sidechain for Bitcoin and the Aion network for Ethereum.

Consensus algorithms play a vital role in blockchain scalability. Traditional proof-of-work (PoW) algorithms, while secure, can be computationally intensive and limit transaction throughput. As a result, alternative consensus mechanisms are emerging to strike a balance between speed and security. Proof-of-stake (PoS), delegated proof-of-stake (DPoS), and practical Byzantine fault tolerance (PBFT) are among the promising consensus algorithms that can significantly improve scalability. Projects like Cardano (PoS) and EOS (DPoS) demonstrate the potential of these algorithms to achieve high transaction speeds while maintaining security.

With the rise of quantum computing, ensuring the long-term security of blockchain networks becomes crucial. Quantum computers pose a threat to existing cryptographic algorithms used in blockchains, potentially compromising the security of transactions. To address this concern, quantum-resistant blockchains are being developed, incorporating quantum-resistant cryptographic algorithms. By future-proofing blockchain networks against quantum threats, these advancements ensure scalability while maintaining the integrity and security of the system.

State channel networks provide a promising solution for scaling blockchain transactions, particularly for applications that require frequent microtransactions. These networks enable participants to conduct off-chain transactions while still leveraging the security of the underlying blockchain. By creating a state channel between two parties, multiple transactions can be executed without the need for each transaction to be recorded on the blockchain. This significantly improves scalability by reducing the burden on the main chain and minimizing transaction fees. State channel networks like the Raiden Network for Ethereum and the Lightning Network for Bitcoin showcase the potential of this approach.

Blockchain scalability is not limited to transaction throughput alone. It also encompasses the ability to handle complex computations efficiently. Off-chain computation techniques aim to alleviate computational burdens by executing resource-intensive tasks off the blockchain while preserving data integrity. By leveraging technologies such as secure multi-party computation (MPC) and trusted execution environments (TEEs), off-chain computation allows for faster and more scalable processing of complex tasks. This trend opens up possibilities for implementing computationally demanding blockchain applications in areas such as artificial intelligence, machine learning, and big data analytics.

While sharding has gained attention as a promising scaling solution, further advancements are being made to enhance its capabilities. Shard chains enable the creation of multiple interconnected chains, each responsible for processing a subset of transactions or smart contracts. These shard chains can operate independently while benefiting from cross-shard communication when necessary. By distributing the workload across multiple chains, shard chains offer improved scalability, parallel transaction processing, and reduced congestion. Ethereums ongoing development of shard chains through Ethereum 2.0 is a notable example of this trend.

As the blockchain ecosystem expands, achieving interoperability between different blockchain networks becomes crucial for scalability. Blockchain interoperability protocols facilitate seamless communication and data transfer across disparate networks, enabling the exchange of assets and information. These protocols enhance scalability by allowing users and developers to leverage the strengths of multiple blockchains while avoiding network congestion and bottlenecks. Projects like Polkadot, Cosmos, and ICON focus on building interoperability frameworks, enabling cross-chain transactions and facilitating scalability through network interoperability.

Building upon the concept of layer-two solutions, layer-three solutions are emerging to further push the boundaries of blockchain scalability. These solutions aim to address specific limitations of layer-two protocols while offering enhanced features and capabilities. Layer-three solutions may include advanced routing algorithms, improved privacy features, or novel consensus mechanisms that enable even higher scalability and efficiency. These advancements are expected to unlock new possibilities for blockchain applications, particularly in areas that require massive transaction processing, such as decentralized finance (DeFi) and decentralized exchanges (DEXs).

The landscape of blockchain scalability is continuously evolving, with innovative solutions and emerging trends shaping the future of decentralized systems. State channel networks, off-chain computation, shard chains, blockchain interoperability protocols, and layer-three solutions are among the developments propelling scalability to new heights. By combining these advancements with ongoing research and collaboration, blockchain technology is poised to overcome scalability challenges and pave the way for widespread adoption across industries, ushering in a new era of decentralized applications and services.

Also, read The Future of Blockchain Technology and Value Traits

Scalability remains a critical challenge for blockchain technology to achieve widespread adoption and fulfill its transformative potential. However, the future of blockchain scalability appears promising, with several emerging trends and innovations offering solutions to enhance transaction throughput, reduce latency, and improve user experience. Sharding, layer-two solutions, sidechains, consensus algorithm innovations, and quantum-resistant blockchains are among the key areas driving the evolution of blockchain scalability. As these trends continue to mature and gain traction, we can expect significant advancements in blockchain technology, enabling the realization of scalable, efficient, and secure decentralized systems.

Read more from the original source:

Emerging Trends In Blockchain Scalability: A Glimpse Into The Future - Blockchain Magazine

Sam Altman and Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Ct.). | Getty Images

AI took its star turn through Congress this week, with lawmakers doing their best to demonstrate their awareness of how the tech is already disrupting society.

The highlight was a hearing featuring OpenAIs celebrity CEO Sam Altman, who welcomed the idea of flagging AI-generated content by default, and even standing up a new regulatory agency. Sen. Gary Peters (D-Mich.), chair of the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, went even wonkier, holding a hearing on how the technology can or should be promulgated throughout the federal bureaucracy.

But even Congress best, bipartisan foot forward might still be a step behind. Because after all, those are todays problems.

Or even yesterdays, as lawmakers largely apply a lexicon that was developed for the social media eras data privacy and safety issues to an entirely new technology. When Congress turned its eye to the World Wide Web in the early 1990s, there was no way of knowing they were laying the first rails of a track that would lead to our currently-raging debate around TikTok, for example. What could they be missing now?

People are borrowing mental models from data privacy debates from five years ago, said Samuel Hammond, a senior economist at the Foundation for American Innovation who recently wrote in POLITICO Magazine about an entirely different, existential policy issue AI might pose.

Its completely unwieldy how do you even define the scope of the scene, when youre taking the hype around AI and conflating general purpose systems that have uncanny levels of understanding and reasoning with stuff that was around 10 years ago?

Hammond wrote in his op-ed about the need to place guardrails around the development of a potential artificial general intelligence that would supersede even humanitys capabilities. But you can turn the science fiction knob a little bit further to the left and find more concrete examples where the pace of development might outstrip our regulatory capacity: Hammond noted today that in this weeks hearings even Altman, generally a supporter of the current open-source AI development ecosystem, called for federal licensing only in the case of hyper-sophisticated autonomous agents, or AI that could design a novel pathogen.

In todays Morning Tech newsletter POLITICOs Mallory Culhane nodded to the general understanding in the tech industry that AI regulation will require specific, industry-level expertise and judgment especially given how rapidly the technology is developing.

If the United States wants to have a regulatory environment for AI that is flexible, responsive, and adaptable to emerging risks, it should lean into the sector-specific approach it has taken to regulation, Hodan Omaar, a senior policy analyst at the nonpartisan Center for Data Innovation, told Mallory. Federal regulators are the best placed to regulate issues in different domains because they have industry-specific knowledge.

Veteran regulator and former Federal Communications Commission Chairman Tom Wheeler praised the Digital Platform Commission Act re-introduced today by Sens. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) and Peter Welch (D-Vt.), which would stand up a new agency specifically to oversee digital platforms and address algorithmic harm. He said that while existing agencies have plenty of tools for tackling AI the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission punishing AI discrimination in hiring, for example, or the CFPB policing AI-driven financial fraud a new platform, built on new regulatory principles, could have the agility to meet the unforeseen threats AI might pose.

What you need to have is a structure that is based on the English common law concept of duty of care that says a company has a responsibility to identify and mitigate potential harms that come from its product or service, Wheeler said. Technology is changing, the marketplace is changing, and we have to be agile as regulators.

Of course, navigating the foreseeability on which the duty of care concept is based is a little bit tricky when it comes to something like AI tools, where sometimes even the developers of a machine learning system arent quite sure how to explain whats going on inside it. Some more libertarian-minded thinkers believe that in that case its better to leave well enough alone until a tangible risk emerges.

When I see legislation dropping, or proposals for a whole new regulatory agency for AI, Im puzzled by what problem people are trying to solve, said Neil Chilson, senior research fellow at the Center for Growth and Opportunity. I worry that if we get it wrong, we throw out a bunch of benefits to consumers and cede ground to China, where what they will do with this technology is not in our best interest.

That leaves Washington doing what it can with the issues that are in front of it. And as POLITICOs Mohar Chatterjee and Rebecca Kern reported yesterday, those might be far closer to home than any threat of AGI or runaway software as a House subcommittee debated issues of rights and provenance around the images, essays, and even songs produced by generative AI. Yes, the development and spread of powerful AI is a promethean technological moment on par with the printing press or the internet. But for now and, its worth keeping in mind, as with both of those technologies the average person is just here for the memes.

A message from CTIA The Wireless Association:

America does not have enough full-power, licensed spectrum to meet exploding demand and fuel 5G-driven innovation. Congress must act now to restore FCC auction authority and allocate 1500MHz of new 5G mid-band spectrum to secure reliable wireless for all, and Americas leadership of the industries and innovations of the future. We can lead the world if we act now. Learn more at More5GSpectrum.com.

The Olympic rings are set up at a plaza that overlooks the Eiffel Tower in Paris on Sept. 14, 2017. | AP Photo//Michel Eule

The AI-powered crowd-control train keeps rolling: A French court has ruled that AI-powered cameras can be used to surveil crowds at the 2024 Paris Olympics.

As POLITICOs Laura Kayali reported yesterday evening, Frances Constitutional Council said that the law allowing for the use of experimental camera systems was valid because humans would ultimately be driving the development, implementation and possible evolution of algorithmic processing.

Human accountability has been a major sticking point for activists concerned about AI abuses or mishaps, like the numerous wrongful arrests or convictions that have marred the technologys rollout across the globe. But in this case its not enough for activists who warn that any implementation of algorithmic surveillance is too dangerous, and call for it to be banned outright: As Matt Berg reported in yesterdays DFD, a leading activist and researcher argued the overall deployment of facial recognition here should be alarming to everyone Because its even more of this incremental creep of surveillance theater that seems poorly designed to actually keep people safe, but its really problematic from a privacy perspective.

In France, at least, theyll be parsing that dilemma through March 2025, when the systems approval is set to expire.

A message from CTIA The Wireless Association:

Outlier Ventures, a London-based Web3 investing firm, has updated its outlook for the open-source, nigh-utopian vision for the metaverse that it and other decentralization boosters have been developing over the past several years.

Their new report, portentously titled The Open Metaverse Under Attack, warns of an ecosystem beset on all sides. The main roadblocks right now to their vision of a blockchain-based, user-owned 3D world: The rise of crypto scams and scandals, which tarnish the reputation of basic blockchain technology; the restriction and regulation of stablecoins; the potential classification of all crypto activity as securities trading; and the inevitable threat of monopoly as actors like FTX leave the crypto landscape.

The solution they propose is a stark, appropriately market-oriented one, saying that to drive adoption despite these risks developers must continue to walk the fine line between making Web3 accessible and usable. Building products that dont just compete purely on the philosophy of decentralization and user sovereignty, but that are 10x better than incumbents and/or allow entirely new functionality and benefits.

Stay in touch with the whole team: Ben Schreckinger ([emailprotected]); Derek Robertson ([emailprotected]); Mohar Chatterjee ([emailprotected]); Steve Heuser ([emailprotected]); and Benton Ives ([emailprotected]). Follow us @DigitalFuture on Twitter.

If youve had this newsletter forwarded to you, you can sign up and read our mission statement at the links provided.

CORRECTION: This newsletter has been updated to reflect that Neil Chilson is a senior research fellow at the Center for Growth and Opportunity.

A message from CTIA The Wireless Association:

5G is the fastest growing generation of wireless and its already having a big impact with 5G for home broadband helping to address the digital divide by bringing real competition to cable. Americans will use 5X more 5G data in the next five years, but today we do not have enough full-power, licensed spectrum to meet that demand. A new study from the Brattle Group predicts that America will need up to 1500MHz of 5G mid-band spectrum to avoid overloading our networks and support the development of the industries of the future. China and other countries see the same challenge and are moving quickly to allocate 370% more full-power spectrum than the United States. Congress must act now to restore FCC auction authority and allocate 1500MHz of new 5G mid-band spectrum to secure reliable wireless for all, and Americas economic and national security. Learn more at More5GSpectrum.com.

Read more here:

The one big problem Washington faces on AI - POLITICO

This is part three of our three part series on communication in cryptocurrency, touching on what Web3 does well and what Web3 does not so well in communicating its messages to the wider world.

You can find part one on Web3 language barriers here, and part two on communication crises here.

Im relatively new to cryptoland, I will admit that at the top.

In some respects, my newness would be a disservice to my ability to volley valid opinions. But in others, I would argue that my fresh eyes provide the opportunity for unbiased perspective.

When I departed traditional finance, I thought I was heading to the land of decentralization for the greater good, a land with an undeterrable focus on equality, an unbreakable vow to shatter the system that was burdened with centuries of cultural tech debt and flaws. Huzzah! I said.

I write today to express my disappointment. Its exceedingly difficult to argue that there has been any legitimate attempt to break the system, when the foundation of cryptoland is so clearly colonial. It was a house with good bones for keeping people out, and we moved in and changed the wallpaper.

I lived in the traditional finance house for long enough to get the size of it. I wore neutral nail polish and sensible heels; I have tried on roughly 400 pairs of black dress pants (half of which fit too poorly and half of which fit too nicely). I have owned (gasp) a logo-emblazoned vest. I know what it means to require that everyone fit neatly into a box thats shaped like a man, and I know what it feels like when no one is really trying to fix it.

Cryptos mission was so wholesome: Free ourselves from the shackles of archaic technology and geopolitical agendas and all of the history and bad blood that comes with it.

Unfortunately, the shackles were just moved from one wrist to the other.

I believe you when you say you didnt realize that the fabric of society paved the way for you to become a part of the problem.

But history shows us that the issues I find in crypto have already been around for a long, long time.

If you can bear with me back to World War II, the deployment of our nations male youth meant non-traditional roles for women like computer science tasks. But while the ladies willingness to help with the button pushing was applauded, when the men went home after the war, so did the women.

By 1970, clamoring for social change was bearing real fruit and 14% of all computer science degrees were held by women. But women didnt have the privilege of exhibiting behavior that may have been conceived as weird or rude, meaning that a generation of female computer geniuses may have run away from discrimination at computer science programs and jobs as fast as they could.

The 90s ushered in the era of big personalities with big ambitions (ahem, Peter Thiel) creating a new profile that sticks: what a genius tech founder should be like. And whats the only thing thats worse than a woman being rude? A woman being confident. That paired with the fact women are broadly more risk averse, a funded female founder was then (and still is) very hard to come by. But if it helps you sleep, the percentage of women with computer science degrees was up to 35%.

Cruising right along, the dot com bubble burst in 2001-ish and instead of saying, Hey maybe an entire industry fueled by male narcissism was a problem, where are the ladies at? we said yo bring the bro nerds back.

May I introduce you all to Silicon Valley. An ego was certainly still a prerequisite, but you got bonus points if you exuded the brand of awkward thats often contrived as male genius. The pitch decks for women seeking funding were campfire fodder for lavish VC work retreats.

Oh by the way, the percentage of computer science degrees held by women was down to 18% by 2022. Oops.

At every single acceleration point for technological advancement, we have witnessed a relabeling and repackaging of the underlying culture we are supposed to be grateful to for such successes. Time and time again, the underlying message is clear: technology is a toy for boys. Crypto is no different.

It is clear to see how we got to where we are today, and the resulting lack of women in cryptoland is frankly understandable; you cant build a diverse team if the talent doesnt exist. But what is unacceptable is continuing to use traditional finances gatekeeping playbook.

Traditional finance is exceptional at making sure only the select few understand how it all works; they never tried to include women, and its the cornerstone of wealth inequality. Lets be different.

Can we also have the tenacity to say our failings out loud?

If I said to someone: Well, crypto is not really that different from traditional finance, is it?

The initial bad reaction Id get is likely a defense of decentralized finances values, but a secondary reaction may very well be about the allegedly superior culture.

Were not content to accept slow passive evolution on the back of reinvesting stable corporate profits! Were changing the world! Okay. Lets change it for everyone.

Its time to stop playing dead and dumb when it comes to the lack of diversity in talent pipelines. Not to be hyperbolic, but our society still doesnt think women can do STEM. It permeates our entire existence, starting with childrens toys and the infection only spreads from there. Its a seemingly impossible problem, but we are a powerful community and that comes with responsibility. Lets rise to the occasion.

It is from experience when I tell you: Cryptoland will embody hypocrisy for as long as we pretend like inclusion is a core tenet of the community.

If you say you want this community to be different from traditional finance, prove it.

Alex Gray leads the Finance team at Blockworks. Before Blockworks she took a tour through traditional finance, visiting: corporate banking, bank balance sheet management, equity research, and fintech.She feels most grateful when she is solving hard problems, running lots of miles, and reading long books. She knows more about baseball than you do.

Get the days top crypto news and insights delivered to your email every evening.Subscribe to Blockworks free newsletternow.

Want alpha sent directly to your inbox? Get degen trade ideas, governance updates, token performance, cant-miss tweets and more fromBlockworks Researchs Daily Debrief.

Cant wait? Get our news the fastest way possible.Join us on Telegram and follow us on Google News.

More here:

Exclusive, Divisive, Unwelcoming: Yes, This Is Crypto for Women - Blockworks

The Blocksize Debate emerged as a result of the growing popularity of Bitcoin and the increasing strain it placed on the networks capacity. At the heart of the issue was the block size limit, a parameter that restricts the number of transactions that can be included in a single block. Bitcoins original block size limit was set at 1 megabyte (MB), but as transaction volumes surged, concerns arose regarding scalability and the networks ability to handle larger transaction volumes efficiently.

At the heart of the blocksize wars lies a fundamental question: How should the Bitcoin network scale to accommodate the growing demand for transactions? On one side of the spectrum, proponents of a larger blocksize argue that increasing the block capacity is crucial for maintaining low fees and fast confirmation times. They believe that a larger blocksize will enable Bitcoin to handle a higher transaction volume, thereby enhancing its utility as a digital currency.

On the other hand, advocates for a smaller blocksize emphasize the importance of decentralization and network security. They argue that a larger blocksize would lead to increased centralization, as only those with significant resources could afford to operate full nodes. Moreover, they assert that a smaller blocksize ensures a more robust and resilient network, as it reduces the risk of potential attacks and prevents blockchain bloat.

The Blocksize Wars can be primarily understood as a clash between two factions: the proponents of big blocks and the supporters of small blocks.

The big block faction argued that increasing the block size limit would enable more transactions to be processed per block, thereby improving scalability and reducing transaction fees. They believed that prioritizing transaction throughput would allow Bitcoin to compete with traditional payment systems.

On the other side, the small block faction emphasized the importance of maintaining a decentralized network by keeping the block size limit unchanged or implementing more conservative increases. They believed that larger blocks would lead to centralization, as only those with significant resources could afford to process and store larger blocks, potentially excluding smaller participants from the network.

As the scaling debate intensified, both factions rallied support from the Bitcoin community, leading to a divided ecosystem and heated discussions across online forums, social media platforms, and conferences. Various proposals and solutions were put forward, each with its own set of advantages and disadvantages.

SegWit, a proposed soft fork solution, aimed to address the scalability issue by separating transaction data from signature data, effectively increasing the effective block size. By implementing SegWit, the small block faction believed they could alleviate congestion without compromising decentralization.

Bitcoin Unlimited, favored by the big block faction, advocated for a block size increase through a hard fork, allowing for larger blocks and potentially higher transaction throughput. This proposal received significant attention and sparked intense debates within the Bitcoin community.

The Blocksize Wars ultimately led to the emergence of alternative versions of Bitcoin through hard forks, resulting in the creation of Bitcoin Cash (BCH) and Bitcoin SV (BSV). These forks aimed to implement larger block sizes, catering to the demands of the big block faction. However, it is essential to note that Bitcoin (BTC) remained the dominant and most widely recognized version of the crypto.

The Blocksize Wars had a profound and lasting impact on the Bitcoin community and the wider crypto ecosystem. Here are some key implications:

The ongoing debate highlighted the urgent need for scalability solutions in cryptocurrencies. Bitcoins transaction fees surged during peak congestion periods, making microtransactions less feasible. This underscored the importance of finding effective scaling solutions.

The Blocksize Wars exposed deep divisions within the Bitcoin community, leading to fractured relationships and debates that continue to echo within the cryptocurrency space. Despite these divisions, Bitcoin has maintained its dominant position, indicating its resilience and enduring popularity.

The intense discussions surrounding scalability prompted researchers, developers, and entrepreneurs to explore alternative cryptocurrencies and innovative scaling solutions. This competition drove progress and led to the development of Layer 2 solutions like the Lightning Network, which seeks to address Bitcoins scalability while ensuring decentralization.

Bottom Line

The Blocksize wars are a pivotal moment in Bitcoins history, underscoring the challenges and complexities of scaling decentralized crypto. While the debates and divisions were intense, they also fueled innovation and progress in the broader blockchain space. As the crypto ecosystem continues to evolve, the lessons learned from the Blocksize Wars serve as a reminder of the importance of balancing scalability, decentralization, and community consensus in shaping the future of cryptocurrencies.

Excerpt from:

Reviving the Blocksize Wars: How the struggle for salability ... - Cryptopolitan

The crypto market is most rewarding to early adopters, and its the same logic for users who get into presale early. Presales often allow projects to raise funds to execute their initial roadmap, but it provides adopters the lowest entry possible, so they get a huge profit advantage when the project eventually launches.

Filecoin(FIL) had one of the most successful presale events in 2021 and made its early adopters a huge profit. Uwerx is in a similar position with a great underlying utility on the WERX token. Uwerx is prime to move with a huge profit margin as the project fully goes live.

Blockchain has proven to be quite a volatile solution in virtually every facet of life, and the most desirable feature of blockchain-based solutions is that it enables community governance and decentralizes the system. With decentralized systems, more value goes back to the community rather than the intermediate bodies controlling the platform.

The gig economy has been in the control of a few leading freelancing companies for the past several years. And as the industry continues to grow, there is a need for better solutions that solve existing issues with predominant platforms.

Forbes reports a lot of correlating statistics as regards the growing freelance economy. Among these are an increasing number of Americans who freelance, even while working full-time, and an increasing percentage of corporations and company owners ready to recruit freelancers.

Uwerx aims to solve predominant issues, including high fees, lack of tools and innovation, payment limitations, and several other minute problems that decentralization will solve. Uwerx saves freelancers and clients from paying expensive service charges. The platform only charges freelancers a 1% fee on all contracts compared to the industry average of 10% 20%.

In addition to low fees, Uwerx will incentivize activity on the platform, allowing users to earn in multiple ways other than job exchange. Uwerx will be powered by its native token WERX, which will be tradable once the platform goes live. WERX presale is on, and users can get early entry and make some profits.

Filecoin is a decentralized network for cloud storage, and its typically decentralizing the cloud storage market, thereby allowing various users worldwide to offer space from their computers for rent. Its one of the very interesting blockchain solutions in the market, but the main detail to look at was its presale.

Filecoin launched what turned out to be one of the most successful presales in crypto back in 2021. FIL sold for around $1 $5 during the course of the sales, and for a token with great utility, everyone was ready to take a lot of profit.

However, what nobody imagined was FIL running up to around $236 at its all-time high just some weeks after launch. These are the typical runs one would expect on presale tokens, and Uwerx has much more to offer, considering the solid utility behind the project.

Follow us for the latest crypto news!

In addition, presale protects early buyers from risk. Filecoin is down over 90% from its all-time high due to legal implications and police investigations into the firm behind the token. However, at the current $4.73 trading price, most presale buyers are still in profit.

The ERC-20 WERX token is live on presale, and it sells for $0.0225 in its initial stage. The price should increase as the sale progresses, so take the opportunity to get this token at the cheapest it will ever be. The project is fully audited by SolidProof and InterFi Network, lending credibility to the legitimacy of the project. You cant afford to miss out on the biggest play in the market right now.

Learn more about Uwerx here:

Presale: invest.uwerx.network

Telegram: https://t.me/uwerx_network

Twitter: https://twitter.com/uwerx_network

Website: https://www.uwerx.network

Crypto News Flash does not endorse and is not responsible for or liable for any content, accuracy, quality, advertising, products, or other materials on this page. Readers should do their own research before taking any actions related to cryptocurrencies. Crypto News Flash is not responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or alleged to be caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, goods, or services mentioned.

Continue reading here:

Price Prediction 2023: Could Uwerx(WERX) Do x100 From Presale ... - Crypto News Flash