Archive for the ‘Democracy’ Category

‘Floridians for Democracy’ formed in response to what members say … – WGCU

Autocracy is a word that carries a lot of weight, and is not one were used to hearing in the United States when describing our political system or those in elected positions.

Autocracys defining feature is the concentration of power in the hands of a few, allowing them to exercise significant control over the political, economic, and social aspects of a country.

There is a newly formed group called Floridians for Democracy still in its infancy thats being created by southwest Floridians in response to what they say are growing autocratic trends here in Florida, and more broadly across the United States. We spoke with its co-founder and three of its founding members.

Guests:

Jim Nathan, co-founder of Floridians for Democracy which is an outgrowth of their initial steering committee called The 1939 Project. He founded it with his wife Karen. Jim served as CEO for Lee Health for 34 years, and since retiring has been an adjunct professor and Executive-in-Residence for the Marieb College Health and Human Services at Florida Gulf Coast University. You can contact Jim at VoicesforRJ@gmail.com for more information about the newly-formed group.

Dr. Robert Hilliard is a humanitarian, activist, educator, author, playwright and World War II veteran. He was former Chief of Public Broadcasting at the FCC and was present for the signing of the Public Broadcasting Act in 1967. He was also a professor and dean at Emerson College in Boston for more than three decades and remains professor emeritus. He is author of dozens of books and plays. Bob's life story was featured in the WGCU-TV documentary, A Force for Freedom: The Robert Hilliard Story. Click here to listen to Dr. Hilliard's episode of Three Song Stories.

Katelyn Tellgren is a senior at FGCU studying Sociology and Gender Studies, and she founded FGCU's chapter of Generation Action with Planned Parenthood.

WGCU is your trusted source for news and information in Southwest Florida. We are a nonprofit public service, and your support is more critical than ever. Keep public media strong anddonate now. Thank you.

Go here to read the rest:
'Floridians for Democracy' formed in response to what members say ... - WGCU

Takeaway From Day One of Kari Lake’s Second Trial: Lake’s Losing … – Democracy Docket

WASHINGTON, D.C. On Wednesday, May 17 191 days after Election Day election denier Kari Lake was back in the courtroom contesting her loss to Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs (D) in the 2022 election. Wednesday marked the start of a new three-day trial, which will focus on one remaining claim regarding signature matching, in Lakes quest to overturn the results of the election.

Prior to this new trial, Lake not only lost her election for Arizona governor by over 17,000 votes, but also consistently lost at three separate court levels. The trial court previously dismissed her election contest, the Arizona Court of Appeals affirmed the trial courts dismissal and finally the Arizona Supreme Court denied review of six of the seven claims in Lakes appeal. Following this ruling, the state Supreme Court sent one claim back to the trial court for further review, which is the subject of this new trial that began on Wednesday.

To prevail at trial, Lake must prove that signature verification did not occur in Maricopa County during the 2022 election. Specifically, she must show that Maricopa County did not conduct signature verification at stage 1, 2 or 3 and that this failure resulted in sufficient numbers to alter the outcome of the election based on a competent mathematical basis to conclude that the outcome would plausibly have been different[.] Arizona voters who cast an early mail-in ballot must sign an affidavit attesting to their identity; this signature is then compared to prior signatures in the voters record to confirm a match.

Day one was largely uneventful, with Lake and Maricopa Countys attorneys presenting their opening statements to the court. Then, Lakes attorney called witnesses or as Lake calls them, whistleblowers to the stand to testify. One of these whistleblowers,Jacqueline Onigkeit, worked as a signature matcher during the election and testified to her experience doing signature verification.

Onigkeit spent almost an hour explaining the training required to do signature verification as well as the intricacies of the process itself. Onigkeit explained: I was very focused on verifying signatures, doing the right job and making sure whether or not the signature matched. She also highlighted the level of scrutiny to which the signature verifiers were held. We were informed several timesthat we were being audited every day. And if we were approving too many signatures or rejecting too many signatures, wed be pulled into the office, get a warning, and if it happened a second time, wed be let go, she explained.

The court heard from other witnesses including two members of a fringe political action group partially funded by conspiracy theorist Mike Lindell called We the People AZ Alliance. Their testimonies were brief and they discussed a 24/7 livestream of the signature verification process, which Lake has to prove did not occur for her claims to be successful in court.

The trial is expected to start again at 12 p.m. EDT today.

Read a Twitter thread of live Tweets here.

Learn more about the case here.

Read the original here:
Takeaway From Day One of Kari Lake's Second Trial: Lake's Losing ... - Democracy Docket

Judith Weinstein: Working as an election judge allowed me to … – Chicago Tribune

Democracy is a verb! Abner Mikva, the late federal judge and Illinois congressman, declared this as he challenged youth across the nation to participate in the election process and use their voices to speak to elected officials.

In high school, before she was eligible to vote, my daughter participated in the Mikva Challenge by serving as a student election judge during the 2012 presidential election.

For my part, I was the key judge in the 44th Wards 9th Precinct for the April 4 Chicago mayoral runoff. It was the hardest day Ive worked in as long as I can remember. It was physically and mentally challenging, and by the end of the evening, I was practically in tears, from feeling exhausted and from witnessing democracy on the front lines.

Democracy is an action verb.

I submitted my application to be a judge in response to an email from the Board of Elections earlier this year. Five days before the runoff, I received an email from the board inviting me to serve. I received a link to a 15-hour online course to be completed by the Sunday before Election Day. The training was highly detailed and tedious, and I sailed through it thinking someone would just tell me what to do the day of.

[Letters: I was an election judge. It was a no-drama day.]

That someone would have been our key judge, but he informed the other judges that he had a last-minute emergency and couldnt work Election Day. The key judge receives a key to the election supply cabinet and signs off on all paperwork. When he asked in a group text if someone could pick up the key, I said yes, not realizing that this made me the key judge with all of its responsibilities (and some additional pay).

The night before the runoff, I slept in fits, afraid of missing my predawn alarm. I arrived at the polling place at 5 a.m. already tired. I met my fellow election judge, George, who had election experience, and Lawrence, who had never worked an election. The three of us had to set up the polling place before the polls opened at 6. That meant assembling the ballot box and voting booths, which was like building a room of Ikea furniture, sleep-deprived and on a tight deadline.

Sharing the school gymnasium polling site with us was another precinct made up of an experienced team of adults who set up their polling place by 5:30 a.m. At 6, when our precincts first eager voter arrived, wearing a Cubs hat and a broad grin, our ballet box was not even set up. George barked, Were not ready for you, sir!

Please give us a minute, I pleaded with my husband, who was voter No. 1 that morning and proud of his civic-minded spouse.

In the absence of the seasoned key judge, we quickly figured out our strengths: Lawrence and George were adept at putting together the equipment and managing the flow of traffic. I, with my keyboarding skills, navigated the electronic poll book and did troubleshooting, which, 99% of the time, meant summoning Colleen, the unflappable key judge from the other precinct to our table.

Colleens team seemed to work effortlessly. A man with low vision was placed at the ballot box to help people guide their ballots into the electronic slide, a brilliant move. Almost every voter in our precinct asked us, Does it matter which way it goes? summoning us to help them insert their ballot. It was hard for us not to see their vote, given there was only one question on the ballot that day. Another member of Colleens team had a mobility issue but a strong, welcoming voice and directed confused voters to the correct precinct table as if they were contestants on The Price is Right: Cmon down!

There were lulls and swarms of voters at predictable points during the day. By the end, the electronic tape showed we had almost 550 voters, or a voter every 90 seconds. The overwhelming majority of voters were patient, pleasant and even demonstrably grateful for the service of our team.

One of the highlights of my day was registering voters new to Chicago, including the ebullient group of recent college graduates who got jobs in the city and were sharing an apartment or new voters such as my neighbors son who just turned 18. I got choked up when I handed him his ballot and said, Now go vote for Da Mare!

At 7 p.m., we closed the polls, just as a group of three young men strolled in. The polls are closed, George announced, as he shot me a look knowing it pained me to turn anyone away. But he was right. The polls were closed, and we had to dismantle the machines, sign the envelopes and get the materials over to the supply station.

[Tom Wogan Sr.: What a last-minute voter taught me about our system in a time of election denial]

Once again, I had to summon Colleen. What do you need? she asked. Her precincts ballots were already signed, sealed and ready to be delivered. We were going to hold her up. Everything, I said, through tears I was trying to hold back.

Very patiently, Colleen showed us how to wrap things up. Colleen! I said. I want you to be my mayor!

I thought about her team of election judges, folks Ive probably passed on the street here in central Lakeview, not giving them a second thought. That day, they became my heroes.

Be a hero. Apply to be an election judge. Democracy needs you.

Judith Weinstein is a public health professional who has lived happily in Chicago for more than 25 years.

Submit a letter, of no more than 400 words, to the editor here or email letters@chicagotribune.com.

Read more:
Judith Weinstein: Working as an election judge allowed me to ... - Chicago Tribune

Letter: Trump is a threat to our democracy – The Daily News of Newburyport

To the editor:

Regarding the opinion of Jay McClenaghan (Do you remember? Daily News of Newburyport, May, 11 2023), I take great exception with the Trumplike propaganda that he espouses.

Mr. McCleneghan has no medical credence claiming President Biden clearly has dementia. This gaslighting technique is presented to cover for his idol, Donald Trump. It is Trump who is excessively incoherent, rambling and repetitive. He drones on during his speeches and slumps over the podium in his laboring delivery while spewing lies about the election and other targets.

For those of us who heard President Bidens speech at Howard University on Saturday, May 13, He was at his eloquent and poignant best, speaking positively about our country and warning us about losing our freedom if right wing extremists like Trump were to be elected.

I remember during Trumps campaign in 2015 that he told his followers, "Mexico would pay for the wall.

I also remember that Trump publicly rejected the threat of COVID-19, saying it would go away by May in 2020, deliberately lying to U.S. citizens. He told Bob Woodward, It's going to disappear one day. It's like a miracle. It will disappear, admitting to Woodward he knew how deadly it was.

I remember Trump trying to coerce President Zalensky if he wanted financial support to find dirt on the Bidens.

I remember him praising the dictator Vladmir Putin, saying Hes a genius. (CNN 5/28/22) for his invasion of Ukraine.

I remember Trump saying the 2020 election was stolen, when judges dismissed more than 50 lawsuits, even under Republican appointed judges. Even his attorney general, Bill Barr, said there was no proof of fraud.

I remember how Trump summoned radical right groups, The Oath Keepers and the Proud Boys, to attack the Capitol to disrupt and prevent the formal ratification of Bidens election to be president. I call this an attempted coup detat. Then he remained in the confines of his room in the White House for several hours watching Capitol police being assaulted, with some dying or emotionally affected.

I remember so very recently of Trump being held libel of sexual assault and defamation of character, determined by a jury of six men and three women. He recently said he would probably pardon convicted Jan. 6 rioters. I remember that he is still under criminal investigation by the Justice Department for lying about taking and possessing top secret documents and by the Georgia Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis for efforts to overturn the 2020 election.

Mr. McClenaghan, your defense of Trump is support for an autocrat. His speeches are filled with hateful diatribe and fear mongering. He is a major threat to the survival of our democracy.

CHRISTOPHER DOLLAS

Byfield

See the rest here:
Letter: Trump is a threat to our democracy - The Daily News of Newburyport

Turkish voters will show strong sense of democracy in run-off vote … – TRT World

Normalisation with Syria

Saying that the opposition is calling for the mass deportation of Syrian refugees in Trkiye, Erdogan noted that "it is impossible to agree with that".

"But I can tell that Turkish NGOs are now doing serious work in terms of reconstruction in northern Syria. They're building houses. These houses are built so that Syrians in Trkiye can return to their homeland," he said.

"Now we are taking another step. In fact, we have also prepared some projects related to housing construction in Syria for the return of nearly one million refugees to their lands. These are pretty cool projects. Together with these projects, we will ensure that Syrian refugees return to their own countries, to their own lands," he added.

Responding to a question on whether restoring relations with Syrian regime head Bashar Al Assad is a possibility, Erdogan said: "I've made some remarks on this. I had a friendship with the Assad family. We used to meet as a family. We were in such a position. Unfortunately, due to some later developments, there was a break in our close relations. This break also upset us."

"(Through) my friendship with President Putin, we thought we could open a door, specifically in our fight against terrorism in the northern part of Syria, which requires close cooperation and solidarity. If we can do that, I said I see no obstacle that would remain in the way of our reconciliation," he added.

When asked about Assad's demand on Trkiye to withdraw its military from Syria for a meeting, Erdogan said: "We have more than 900 kilometres (559 miles) of border and there is a constant terror threat from those borders on our country. The only reason we have a military presence on the border is to fight terrorism. That's the sole reason."

Erdogan said Trkiye will not withdraw from Syria because "the terror threat continues".

Read more:
Turkish voters will show strong sense of democracy in run-off vote ... - TRT World