Archive for the ‘Democracy’ Category

Stanford conference explores Iran’s pathways to democracy … – Stanford University News

The arrest and brutal death of Mahsa Amini, a 22-year-old Kurdish woman, in police custody last September in Iran sparked a wave of protests across the country. Angered by a repressive authoritarian government, protesters calls for Iran to become a secular democracy have since captured global attention.

Shirin Ebadi, left, and Abbas Milani, right, attend the Key Challenges and Pathways to Transition event on Sunday, March 26, 2023, at the Stanford Faculty Club. (Image credit: Trever Tachis)

Abbas Milani, director of the Hamid and Christina Moghadam Program in Iranian Studiesin Stanfords School of Humanities and Sciences, said the demonstrations have mobilized citizens and the Iranian diaspora like never before.

The events that unfolded over the last six months woke up the world to the reality that theres something serious going on in Iran, Milani said.

On Saturday, March 25, and Sunday, March 26, Stanford hosted the conference Dialogues on Irans Transition to Secular Democracy. It convened Iranian leaders and activists, as well as policy experts and researchers at Stanford to deliberate the challenges, strategies, and pathways for Iran to become a democratic society.

The conference was held at the Stanford Faculty Club and welcomed in-person and virtual attendees who gave presentations and participated in workshops, mostly conducted in Persian. It was co-organized by the Hamid and Christina Moghadam Program in Iranian Studies; Gozar, an independent expert collective; and KAI, a prominent group of Silicon Valley leaders interested in Iran.

The conference kicked off Saturday morning with a discussion on the Woman, Life, Freedom slogan and movement borne out of Aminis death and long-standing gender inequality in Iran. Moderated by scholar and politician Fatemeh Haghighatjoo, PhD, it covered the role that women and other minorities play in pushing for democracy and regime change in Iran.

From left, activists Hamed Esmailion, Masih Alinejad, and Nazanin Bonyadi participate remotely in a panel titled Key Challenges and Pathways to Transition on Sunday, March 26, 2023, at the Stanford Faculty Club. (Image credit: Trever Tachis)

Other panels addressed such topics as the peaceful transfer of political power, economic risks, human rights, the role of technology, and key legal issues surrounding a transition to a democratic government in Iran. In the evening, attendees participated in roundtable discussions about amnesty and overcoming misinformation, among other issues.

On Sunday, Milani moderated Key Challenges and Pathways to Transition. The event conducted in Persian convened prominent exiled Iranians: lawyer and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Shirin Ebadi, journalist and activist Masih Alinejad, actress and activist Nazanin Bonyadi, and activist and author Hamed Esmailion. Each was involved in the creation of the Mahsa Charter, a set of proposals for establishing a free and democratic Iran designed to unite Irans pro-democracy opposition.

We need a framework to cooperate and help our country [because] our differences of opinion have let this regime rule over us for 40 years, Ebadi said. Its time to move beyond that.

The panelists said the document incorporates many perspectives and is a starting point for a path forward. They also encouraged revisions.

This is not meant to be the end all be all, Esmailion said. We are open to criticism.

The demonstrations of the last six months have convened tens of thousands of protesters and resulted in hundreds of deaths and injuries by Irans military. When asked what the Iranian diaspora can do to support those on the ground, Alinejad cited correcting misinformation from Irans government, rallying support from other nations, and advocating for Iranians on the global stage.

We are the continuation of the voices from inside Iran, she said.

Panelists noted that many global dictators are united in their support for one another. Irans government, for example, has allied with Russia and supplied ammunition to Vladimir Putins army in Ukraine. Alinejad said that democracy-seekers should also band together.

We need to find our own allies and unite with governments who are on our side, she said.

Milani noted that successful transitions to democracy often unite protesters with some parts of an authoritarian regime, by way of defectors or through negotiations. But Ebadi said that Irans opposition does not yet have the power to be diplomatic and will need more support from risk-averse Iranians who have yet to fully support the democratic cause.

We can only negotiate when we are equals or we have the better hand, she said.

Sundays program included a pre-recorded discussion with Milani; Larry Diamond, the Mosbacher Senior Fellow of Global Democracy at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies and a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution; and Michael McFaul, director of the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies and a former U.S. Ambassador to the Russian Federation. All three have worked together on The Iran Democracy Project within the Hoover Institution to better understand Irans possible transition to democracy.

Diamond shared what he believes to be the necessary conditions for success. There has to be some element of decay and division in the regime and some degree of strategy, organization, unity, and mobilization in the opposition, in order for the situation to be right for a democratic transition, he said.

Given Irans rich oil reserves, he believes the regime is unlikely to disintegrate for lack of resources. The democratic opposition will therefore need greater support from allies as well as international pressure on the regime for a transition to occur.

Integrating diasporas with the people on the ground is often challenging, due to physical distance or differing political or cultural views, among other reasons. McFaul said that transitioning to democracy requires mass cooperation until a regime is replaced.

In the fight against [an] autocratic regime, unity matters a lot, he said.

Milani noted that Irans transition to democracy could have broad implications if successful.

If you look at the last 120 years of history of the Middle East, what happens in Iran does not stay in Iran. It spreads, he said, calling Iran a bellwether in the region.

If we get Iran to become democratic, I think the Middle East will be a different place.

Diamond is also a professor, by courtesy, of sociology and of political science and international studies. McFaul is also the Ken Olivier and Angela Nomellini Professor of International Studies, professor of political science in Stanfords School of Humanities and Sciences, and a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution.

See original here:
Stanford conference explores Iran's pathways to democracy ... - Stanford University News

Secretary Cardona to Lead U.S. Delegation at Summit for … – US Department of Education

On Thursday, March 30, 2023, U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona will travel to Lusaka, Zambia to lead the U.S. delegation at the Summit for Democracy 2023.

On March 29-30, the United States will co-host the second Summit for Democracy with the governments of Costa Rica, the Netherlands, Republic of Korea, and Republic of Zambia. Building on the first Summit for Democracy held in December 2021, this gathering will highlight how democracies deliver for their citizens and are best equipped to address the world's most pressing challenges. The second Summit for Democracy will assemble world leaders in a virtual, plenary format, followed by hybrid gatherings in each of the co-host countries with representatives from government, civil society, and the private sector.

The theme for the Republic of Zambia's summit is "Free, Fair, and Transparent Elections as the Foundation of Democratic Governance." Secretary Cardona will give remarks on March 30, 2023, which will be livestreamed and can be shared upon request. More information can be found here.

The U.S. delegation will also include:

Continued here:
Secretary Cardona to Lead U.S. Delegation at Summit for ... - US Department of Education

Letter: How to help democracy – Daily Herald

There are more stresses on our democracy than Mr. Trump's indictment, but conservatives can relieve most of them by:

Agreeing to ban consideration of the Ten Commandments in education of children and instead attend drag queen story hour for kids at the local elementary school and promote books that teach kids about various sexual practices.

Agreeing that matrimony and traditional family values are regressive ideals, and instead promote cohabitation with readily available reproductive health when a problem arises.

Agreeing that boys are not necessarily boys and girls are not necessarily girls, and that lavatories, locker rooms, and showers should be open to all varieties of gender.

Agreeing that DEI, critical race theory, and climate change are imperative subjects for study in every school at every level, especially in the military academies, because China, Russia, and Iran are less a threat to us than oil, gas, and nuclear power.

Agreeing that persons charged with felonies should be released without bail, and that police should be derided periodically for making arrests.

Agreeing that indictment of a former president is an appropriate exercise of prosecutorial discretion, and a wholesome act that will be good for the health and stability of our country.

Agreeing that certain speech should rightly be shouted down, and the speaker vilified, including invited speakers such as a federal judge deemed disagreeable by a highly compensated VP of DEI at a prestigious law school.

Agreeing, above all, that Judeo Christian Western civilization is exhausted and finished, and turn to Marx, Lenin, Antifa, and the Southern Poverty Law Center for solutions that will last, all the while engaging in sundry chaos and mayhem in urban streets to make the point, particularly by setting buildings on fire, breaking windows, destroying statues, and censoring all contrary thought.

Jack Kenesey

Palatine

Here is the original post:
Letter: How to help democracy - Daily Herald

Politics Podcast: What The Laboratories Of Democracy Are Cooking … – FiveThirtyEight

In our federalist system, the states are often considered laboratories of democracy. State governments test out different policies, or even political strategies, that may someday reach the whole countryordrive red and blue states further apart.

This year, FiveThirtyEight is tracking what state legislation is being proposed and passed and how Republicans and Democrats are going about things differently. In this installment of the FiveThirtyEight Politics podcast, the crew looks at new proposals on guns, taxes, spending plans and identity.

You can listen to the episode by clicking the play button in the audio player above or by downloading it in iTunes, the ESPN App or your favorite podcast platform. If you are new to podcasts, learn how to listen.

The FiveThirtyEight Politics podcast is recorded Mondays and Thursdays. Help new listeners discover the show by leaving us a rating and review on iTunes. Have a comment, question or suggestion for good polling vs. bad polling? Get in touch by email, on Twitter or in the comments.

Go here to see the original:
Politics Podcast: What The Laboratories Of Democracy Are Cooking ... - FiveThirtyEight

Opinion | I Worry About a Failed Prosecution of Trump, but I Worry … – The New York Times

In 1872, President Ulysses S. Grant was arrested by a police officer for speeding in his horse-drawn coach in Washington. The officer stuck out his hand to signal a stop, and Grant obeyed and then accompanied the officer to the police station.

Did that demean the presidency?

No, Id say it was a beautiful tribute to democracy. What was unthinkable for the French Sun King, Louis XIV Ltat, cest moi (I am the state) is appropriate in a system of equality before the law.

The Times reports that a grand jury has voted to indict Donald Trump for hush-money payments to a porn star but that the indictment, for now, is under seal. There are legitimate questions about this particular prosecution, and while we dont know details of the charges, after educated guesses, we wonder:

Should the first indictment of an ex-president be under a novel legal theory that could be rejected by a judge or a jury? What do we make of the doubts about this case even among those who have zero sympathy for Trump? Does District Attorney Alvin Bragg know what hes doing?

None of us can be sure of the answer to these questions until weve seen the evidence presented at trial, and I worry that a failed prosecution might strengthen Trump. Yet Id also worry even more about the message of impunity that would be sent if prosecutors averted their eyes because the suspect was a former president.

The former presidents fixer, Michael Cohen, was sentenced to three years in prison for doing Trumps bidding, and a fundamental principle of justice is that if an agent is punished, then the principal should be as well. That is not always feasible, and it may be difficult to replicate what a federal prosecution achieved in Cohens case. But the aim should be justice, and this indictment honors that aim.

Thats particularly true because this is clearly a higher-stakes crime than a typical case of falsifying business records; the aim apparently was to affect the outcome of a presidential election, and that may have happened.

When Trump is arrested, he reportedly will be fingerprinted, photographed and possibly handcuffed. The question arises: Is it degrading for a democracy to prosecute a former leader?

The democracy that is most expert at arresting former leaders is South Korea, which has gone after five former presidents and which I have covered on and off since I was the Times bureau chief in Hong Kong in the 1980s.

One former president was sentenced to death in 1996 for his role in a massacre during the military dictatorship. His successor was sentenced to 17 years in prison for similar offenses.

Another former president killed himself in 2009 while under investigation in a corruption scandal. That presidents successor was sentenced to a total of 17 years in prison for corruption. And the next president, in office from 2013 to 2017, was sentenced to a total of 25 years in prison for crimes including bribery and abuse of power.

There were times when I thought this parade of prosecutions was a sign of political immaturity. Yet maybe I got it backward. Yes, South Korea in the 1990s was an immature democracy with a penchant for corruption but those prosecutions helped make South Korean democracy more robust.

It is not easy for Koreans to prosecute our former presidents, Jie-ae Sohn, a communications professor at Ewha Womans University in Seoul, told me. It is a painful process and one that we are not happy to show the rest of the world. Nevertheless, this process has made it crystal clear that the rule of law applies to everyone.

Sohn added, This process may be ugly, but we believe this strengthens our democracy and allows it to be more resilient.

There is a counterargument that this is Americas moment for prosecutorial discretion to allow the country to recover and move on. As a teenager, I was outraged when President Gerald Ford pre-emptively pardoned former President Richard Nixon, yet over time I came to think that it was the right call and allowed the country to heal. Yet one difference is obvious: Nixon in 1974 was already completely discredited, ostracized and broken, while Trump denies any wrongdoing and is running again for the White House.

South Korea perhaps offers a model for promoting both the rule of law and healing. While former presidents there received tough sentences, they were all pardoned and released within one to four years.

Its difficult at this stage for me to assess the strength of the Manhattan district attorneys indictment against Trump, but I find inspiration in the words of William H. West, the police officer who arrested Grant for speeding. According to an account he gave many years later, reported in The Washington Post, he told Grant, I am very sorry, Mr. President, to have to do it, for you are the chief of the nation, and I am nothing but a policeman, but duty is duty, sir, and I will have to place you under arrest.

Thats the majesty and dignity of our legal system at its best. And if a police officer in 1872 could hold out his hand and force the presidents speeding carriage to a stop, then we, too, should do what we can to uphold the magnificent principle of equality before the law.

Read more:
Opinion | I Worry About a Failed Prosecution of Trump, but I Worry ... - The New York Times