Mediaboss Marketing

Members of the Congressional Black Caucus Will Host Town Hall and Mobilizer Training

ATLANTA, Aug. 3, 2023 /PRNewswire/ -- Clark Atlanta University is one of 10 locations for the nationwide tour of Democracy For The People, sponsored by the Congressional Black Caucus Institute (CBCI). The stop at CAU will be on August 5 from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.

Each two-part event offers a vital town hall with CBCI members, as well as a comprehensive organizer training on pressing matters of democracy and racial equality in America. This program ensures that the voices and concerns of marginalized communities are not only heard but also heeded by decision-makers at the pinnacle of policymaking. Each leg of the tour also will facilitate voter registration and connecting the community to newly trained personnel.

Members of the media are invited to attend and cover the following events and should RSVP here.

What:Democracy For The People Atlanta

Who: Chairman Steven Horsford (NV-04), Nikema Williams (GA-05), Lucy McBath (GA-07) and members of theCongressional Black Caucus

Location/Dates: August 5, 2023 Clark Atlanta University Thomas W. Cole, Jr. Board Room 223 James P Brawley Drive SW, Atlanta, GA 30314

Time:

About the Congressional Black Caucus Institute (CBCI)CBCI stands as a resolute and transformative force, dedicated to empowering and uplifting African Americans and communities of color across the United States. As the 501 (c) (4) educational and research.

About Clark Atlanta UniversityClark Atlanta University was formed with the consolidation of Atlanta University and Clark College, both of which hold unique places in the annals of African American history. Atlanta University, established in 1865 by the American Missionary Association, was the nation's first institution to award graduate degrees to African Americans. Clark College, established four years later in 1869, was the nation's first four-year liberal arts college to serve a primarily African American student population. Today, with nearly 4,000 students, CAU is the largest of the four institutions (CAU, Morehouse College, Spelman College, and Morehouse School of Medicine) that comprise the Atlanta University Center Consortium. It is also the largest of the 37-member UNCF institutions. Notable alumni include: James Weldon Johnson; American civil rights activist, poet, and songwriter (Lift Every Voice and Sing "The Black National Anthem"; Ralph David Abernathy Sr., American civil rights activist; Congressman Hank

Johnson, Georgia District 4; Kenya Barris, American award-winning television, and movie producer; Kenny Leon, Tony Award-winning Broadway Director; Jacque Reid, Emmy Award-winning Television Personality and Journalist; Brandon Thompson, Vice President of Diversity and Inclusion for NASCAR; Valeisha Butterfield Jones, Vice President of Partnerships & Engagement at Google, Inc. To learn more about Clark Atlanta University, visit http://www.cau.edu.

SOURCE Clark Atlanta University

The rest is here:
Clark Atlanta University Is One of Ten Locations for the Democracy ... - PR Newswire

The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is gearing up for its fourth presidential election under the 2006 constitution, set for December 20 this year. The aftermath of the 2018 elections in which the opposition and some of the international community questioned the legitimacy of the results has cast a shadow of uncertainty over the upcoming polls. Beyond the electoral sphere, constituents are concerned about how a new government will tackle the countrys array of socioeconomic and security challenges, particularly in the eastern part of the DRC, which have vast implications for the region at large.

On August 14, join the Brookings Africa Security Initiative for a conversation with Martin Fayulu, opposition leader and former DRC presidential candidate, and policy experts on the strategic, military, and economic trends of the DRC and the significance of the upcoming election for regional stability and U.S.-China competition in Africa.

Online viewers can submit questions via e-mail to events@brookings.edu or via Twitter @BrookingsFP using #DRC.

Link:
Prospects for democracy, security, and political reform in the ... - Brookings Institution

State Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennsylvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington Washington D.C. West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming Puerto Rico US Virgin Islands Armed Forces Americas Armed Forces Pacific Armed Forces Europe Northern Mariana Islands Marshall Islands American Samoa Federated States of Micronesia Guam Palau Alberta, Canada British Columbia, Canada Manitoba, Canada New Brunswick, Canada Newfoundland, Canada Nova Scotia, Canada Northwest Territories, Canada Nunavut, Canada Ontario, Canada Prince Edward Island, Canada Quebec, Canada Saskatchewan, Canada Yukon Territory, Canada

Zip Code

Country United States of America US Virgin Islands United States Minor Outlying Islands Canada Mexico, United Mexican States Bahamas, Commonwealth of the Cuba, Republic of Dominican Republic Haiti, Republic of Jamaica Afghanistan Albania, People's Socialist Republic of Algeria, People's Democratic Republic of American Samoa Andorra, Principality of Angola, Republic of Anguilla Antarctica (the territory South of 60 deg S) Antigua and Barbuda Argentina, Argentine Republic Armenia Aruba Australia, Commonwealth of Austria, Republic of Azerbaijan, Republic of Bahrain, Kingdom of Bangladesh, People's Republic of Barbados Belarus Belgium, Kingdom of Belize Benin, People's Republic of Bermuda Bhutan, Kingdom of Bolivia, Republic of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana, Republic of Bouvet Island (Bouvetoya) Brazil, Federative Republic of British Indian Ocean Territory (Chagos Archipelago) British Virgin Islands Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria, People's Republic of Burkina Faso Burundi, Republic of Cambodia, Kingdom of Cameroon, United Republic of Cape Verde, Republic of Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad, Republic of Chile, Republic of China, People's Republic of Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia, Republic of Comoros, Union of the Congo, Democratic Republic of Congo, People's Republic of Cook Islands Costa Rica, Republic of Cote D'Ivoire, Ivory Coast, Republic of the Cyprus, Republic of Czech Republic Denmark, Kingdom of Djibouti, Republic of Dominica, Commonwealth of Ecuador, Republic of Egypt, Arab Republic of El Salvador, Republic of Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Faeroe Islands Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Fiji, Republic of the Fiji Islands Finland, Republic of France, French Republic French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon, Gabonese Republic Gambia, Republic of the Georgia Germany Ghana, Republic of Gibraltar Greece, Hellenic Republic Greenland Grenada Guadaloupe Guam Guatemala, Republic of Guinea, Revolutionary People's Rep'c of Guinea-Bissau, Republic of Guyana, Republic of Heard and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras, Republic of Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of China Hrvatska (Croatia) Hungary, Hungarian People's Republic Iceland, Republic of India, Republic of Indonesia, Republic of Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq, Republic of Ireland Israel, State of Italy, Italian Republic Japan Jordan, Hashemite Kingdom of Kazakhstan, Republic of Kenya, Republic of Kiribati, Republic of Korea, Democratic People's Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait, State of Kyrgyz Republic Lao People's Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon, Lebanese Republic Lesotho, Kingdom of Liberia, Republic of Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein, Principality of Lithuania Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Macao, Special Administrative Region of China Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar, Republic of Malawi, Republic of Malaysia Maldives, Republic of Mali, Republic of Malta, Republic of Marshall Islands Martinique Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Mauritius Mayotte Micronesia, Federated States of Moldova, Republic of Monaco, Principality of Mongolia, Mongolian People's Republic Montserrat Morocco, Kingdom of Mozambique, People's Republic of Myanmar Namibia Nauru, Republic of Nepal, Kingdom of Netherlands Antilles Netherlands, Kingdom of the New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua, Republic of Niger, Republic of the Nigeria, Federal Republic of Niue, Republic of Norfolk Island Northern Mariana Islands Norway, Kingdom of Oman, Sultanate of Pakistan, Islamic Republic of Palau Palestinian Territory, Occupied Panama, Republic of Papua New Guinea Paraguay, Republic of Peru, Republic of Philippines, Republic of the Pitcairn Island Poland, Polish People's Republic Portugal, Portuguese Republic Puerto Rico Qatar, State of Reunion Romania, Socialist Republic of Russian Federation Rwanda, Rwandese Republic Samoa, Independent State of San Marino, Republic of Sao Tome and Principe, Democratic Republic of Saudi Arabia, Kingdom of Senegal, Republic of Serbia and Montenegro Seychelles, Republic of Sierra Leone, Republic of Singapore, Republic of Slovakia (Slovak Republic) Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia, Somali Republic South Africa, Republic of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands Spain, Spanish State Sri Lanka, Democratic Socialist Republic of St. Helena St. Kitts and Nevis St. Lucia St. Pierre and Miquelon St. Vincent and the Grenadines Sudan, Democratic Republic of the Suriname, Republic of Svalbard & Jan Mayen Islands Swaziland, Kingdom of Sweden, Kingdom of Switzerland, Swiss Confederation Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan, Province of China Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand, Kingdom of Timor-Leste, Democratic Republic of Togo, Togolese Republic Tokelau (Tokelau Islands) Tonga, Kingdom of Trinidad and Tobago, Republic of Tunisia, Republic of Turkey, Republic of Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda, Republic of Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom of Great Britain & N. Ireland Uruguay, Eastern Republic of Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Viet Nam, Socialist Republic of Wallis and Futuna Islands Western Sahara Yemen Zambia, Republic of Zimbabwe

See original here:
Israeli protesters are calling for democracy. But what about the ... - El Paso Inc.

Editors note: Rachel Marshall is the executive director of the Institute for Innovation in Prosecution at John Jay College in New York City. The opinions expressed in this commentary are her own. Readmore opinionat CNN.

A new threat to our democracy has emerged in Georgia and Im not talking about thefalse claims of 2020 election fraud. A new law,signed by Gov. Brian Kemp, creates a commission to restrict the independence of community-elected prosecutors or remove them from office altogether.

Fortunately, those who care about protecting democracy are fighting back. On Wednesday, four Georgia prosecutors, led byDeKalb County District Attorney Sherry Bostonand represented by thePublic Rights Project, sued the state to contest the laws interference with the separation of powers and its overriding of local communities rights to choose their own prosecutors.

The prosecutors are also defending their First Amendment right to speak openly about their offices priorities for instance, do they use their limited resources to prosecute abortions or violent crimes such as sexual violence, robbery or homicide?

Senate Bill 92creates a commission with the power to remove prosecutors based on their use of this constitutionally protected discretion. It invites complaints against prosecutors for their so-called abandonment of duties, including when they decline to prosecute provable cases, or when they reject the prosecution of certain categories of crime. A prosecutor removed by the commissioncannot serve again for 10 years.

As the executive director of theInstitute for Innovation in Prosecutionat John Jay College, a national prosecutorial reform center, I am deeply concerned about the harms SB 92 will inflict on prosecutors and the communities they serve. The law not only threatens the indispensable role of prosecutorial discretion in our legal system but is also a bad faith attempt to undermine prosecutors who advance reform and disempower communities that elected them.

Story continues

SB 92 did not emerge from a simple misunderstanding of the role of prosecutors. Instead, the law takes aim at reform-minded prosecutors as part of a growing national effort to constrain their independence.

One target may be Fulton County District AttorneyFani Willis, who soonis expected to announce charges in her 2020 election interference investigation and whomformer President DonaldTrump has tried to disqualify.

District Attorney Deborah Gonzalezof Athens-Clarke and Oconee counties has facednear-constant attacksfor decisions such as declining to prosecute marijuana possessionor truancy cases despite beingelected for her reform approach. The governor triedto cancel her election, leading her to sue and win. Kemp has now moved on to new approaches.

Indeed, Kemp made no secret of SB 92s legislative intent. In signing the bill in May,Kemp said, I wont stand idly by [as law enforcement faces] resistance from rogue or incompetent prosecutors who refuse to uphold the law.

Playing into pervasivefalse narratives around reform prosecutors,Kemp assertedthe commission will help hold prosecutors driven by out-of-touch politics [rather] than commitment to their responsibilities accountable and make our communities safer.

This is political hogwash. Data establishes that prosecutors reform-minded approaches advance public safety. Indeed,one studyshowed that decisions by prosecutorsnotto file low-level categories of crime actually reduce recidivism. Thoughtful, data-driven reform drives public safety but some politiciansuse fearmongering around reformto advance their own political agendas.

Its worth noting that there have been no similar attacks on prosecutorial discretion when prosecutors use it to perpetuate mass incarceration, criminalize poverty or decline to prosecute police officers for excessive use of force. This law has only one target:reform-mindedprosecutors.

Georgias law does not exist in a vacuum: In response to a growing wave of reform-minded prosecutors, Georgiais just one of several states attemptingto disempower local prosecutors and limit their discretion.

It is no accident that these attacks come in the wake of theDobbsv. Jackson Womens Health Organizationdecision allowing states to criminalize abortion. Georgia nowprohibits abortion after six weeksof pregnancy; SB 92, among other issues, takes aim at prosecutors who prioritize the safety of pregnant people by deciding not to pursue cases under that statute.

Other states have taken a more direct approach. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis suspendedHillsborough County State Attorney Andrew Warrenfollowing that prosecutors promise to decline prosecuting abortion-related cases.

Forcing prosecutors to abandon discretion also fundamentally misconstrues their role; SB 92 depicts prosecutors as robots who must file every charge possible a challenge considering the enormity of charges listed in penal codes.Such a view runs counter to our legal systems design, which grants prosecutors discretion at every stage.

Prosecutors decide when to file charges, what charges to file and what outcomes to pursue. No prosecutor in history can, has or should prosecute every case possible. For example,Towaliga Judicial CircuitDistrict Attorney Jonathan Adams issued a memorandum explaining thathe would not prosecute adultery,a crime that remains on Georgias books. SB 92 deems this common-sense policy as possible grounds for discipline and removal.

Prosecutors represent the people local communities and are elected precisely to decide how to allocate limited resources. Communities deserve to have prosecutors who are free to be transparent about their priorities. Silencing or removing prosecutors and candidates undermines the democratic process.

SB 92s limits on discretion are also impractical. Forcing prosecutors to file every case would not only advance unjust prosecutions but would also clog courts with cases that dont belong in the legal system at all.Courts are already facingenormous backlogs and victims and defendants alike will suffer from further delays.

Finally, reform-minded prosecutors seek to address racial bias; targeting them overrides the will of communities of color, who are already disproportionately harmed by the criminal justice system.

These legislative restrictions on prosecutorial discretion follow a rise in the number of elected reform-minded prosecutors includingmore prosecutors of color particularly incommunities of color. It is no coincidence SB 92 comes in the wake of this changing tide.

It is hard to overstate the potential damage of SB 92. The rights of local communities and locally elected prosecutors to advocate for them cannot be forfeited. Prosecutors should not be mere puppets of the state. If we care about democracy, and if we value fairness in our legal system, we must stop these bad faith attacks.

After all, just as in 2020, the fight to preserve democracy in Georgia is really a fight for our nation.

For more CNN news and newsletters create an account at CNN.com

Go here to read the rest:
Opinion: A new and dangerous attack on democracy in Georgia - Yahoo News

Nomenclature is not the only thing Koshi Province is heated over at the moment. For the past month, it has been a centre of much political consternation, even affecting national politics, as top leaders of major parties are deeply invested in the race to make and break governments in the province. Uddhab Thapa has come back to power, riding on the back of the magic number of 47, in a 93-strong provincial assembly, after getting Baburam Gautam, the Speaker, to resign from his post.

Gautams defection from the Speakers dais to the provincial cabinet, where he has clinched the post of the Minister of Finance after hard bargaining with Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal, is a reiteration of deceit to democracy. Earlier, even when he held the position of the assembly Speaker, he had signed in Thapas support, a constitutional overreach that the Supreme Court had to correct.

But the road ahead is certain to be bumpy for Thapa, as there are doubts whether he will get the majority when he attempts to gain the mandatory vote of confidence within a month. To check the Uddhab Thapa-led alliance of the Nepali Congress, the Maoist-Centre and sundry parties from getting majority, the CPN-UML, the main opposition, is likely to force Sirjana Danuwar, the Deputy Speaker of the assembly, to resign too. That will effectively render the assembly headless, as the Speakers position is already vacant, and the alliance cannot afford to elect one as that would deprive it of a majority in the assembly. Such an impasse will effectively start the race to power all over again, and could lead to midterm elections if the parties run out of options to outdo one another.

Although the idea of the midterms is not unconstitutional, it will yet again establish that democratic politics is a zero-sum game in Nepal. Above everything else, legality is the domain of ethics, and that should not be breached. Political practices that overlook ethics and depend on deceit to fulfil their self-serving goals are bound to create instability and uncertainty. Above all, they instil in citizens a sense of dejection and mistrust towards politicsand that is dangerous in a democracy.

Moreover, if the democratic process continues to be just a tool for the political parties to rise to power, it will lead to a crisis in the legitimacy of federalism. At a time when there is widespread scepticism about federalisms relevance in a resource-starved country like Nepal, the Koshi consternation has left the impression that the provinces are nothing but a duplication of the rat-race to power that is the so-called democratic process at the centre.

The impasse also has to do with an interesting mathematical miscalculation on the part of the constitutionalists and political leaders who decided on the number 93 while allocating seats for the Koshi provincial assembly. It looks like they did not factor in the position of the Speaker, let alone imagine an impasse like the current one, when they settled on the odd number. It is perhaps something for the framers of the constitution to mull over. More worryingly, the whirlwind race for powerbe it in provinces or at the federal levelcalls into question the legitimacy of parliamentary democracy itself.

View post:
Democracy as arithmetic - The Kathmandu Post