Archive for the ‘Democracy’ Category

On the Knifes Edge of Democracy – The Bulwark

Editors note: The following is the statement of Judge Michael Luttig, submitted to the United States House Select Committeeon the January 6, 2021, Attack on the United States Capitol on June 16, 2022, prior to Luttigs appearance before the Committee. We are reproducing it here in its entirety.

Honorable Members of the House Select Committee

A stake was driven through the heart of American democracy on January 6, 2021, and our democracy today is on a knifes edge.

America was at war on that fateful day, but not against a foreign power. She was at war against herself. We Americans were at war with each other over our democracy.

January 6 was but the next, foreseeable battle in a war that had been raging in America for years, though that day was the most consequential battle of that war even to date. In fact, January 6 was a separate war unto itself, a war for Americas democracy, a war irresponsibly instigated and prosecuted by the former president, his political party allies, and his supporters. Both wars are raging to this day.

A peaceful end to these wars is desperately needed. The war for our democracy could lead to the peaceful end to the war for Americas cultural heart and soul. But if a peaceful end to the war for Americas democracy is not achievable, there is little chance for a peaceful end to that war. The settlement of this war over our democracy is necessary to the settlement of any war that will ever come to America, whether from her shores or to her shores. Though disinclined for the moment, as a political matter of fact only the party that instigated this war over our democracy can bring an end to that war.

Like our war from a distant time, these twin wars are testing whether th[is] nation or any nation . . . so conceived in Liberty . . . can long endure. We must hope that January 6 was the final battle of at least the deadly war for Americas democracy.

These senseless wars are of our own making, and they are now being waged throughout the land, in our city centers and town squares, in our streets and in our schools, where we work and where we play, in our houses of worship even within our own families. These wars were conceived and instigated from our Nations Capital by our own political leaders collectively and they have been cynically prosecuted by them to fever pitch, now to the point that they have recklessly put America herself at stake.

America is now the stake in these unholy wars.

Serious thinkers about the American experiment who are not given to apocalyptic prophesying question whether America is on the verge of a literal civil war. But is even this figurative civil war to be our generations legacy to posterity?

These wars that we are waging against each other are immoral wars, not moral ones, being immorally waged over morality itself. We Americans no longer agree on what is right or wrong, what is to be valued and what is not, what is acceptable behavior and not, and what is and is not tolerable discourse in civilized society. Let alone do we agree on how we want to be governed or by whom, or where we go from here and with what shared national ideals, values, beliefs, purposes, goals, and objectives if any at all.

America is adrift. We pray that it is only for this fleeting moment that she has lost her way, until we Americans can once again come to our senses.

The war on democracy instigated by the former president and his political party allies on January 6 was the natural and foreseeable culmination of the war for America. It was the final fateful day for the execution of a well-developed plan by the former president to overturn the 2020 presidential election at any cost, so that he could cling to power that the American People had decided to confer upon his successor, the next president of the United States instead. Knowing full well that he had lost the 2020 presidential election, the former president and his allies and supporters falsely claimed and proclaimed to the nation that he had won the election, and then he and they set about to overturn the election that he and they knew the former president had lost.

The treacherous plan was no less ambitious than to steal Americas democracy.

Called to Washington D.C. that day by the president, the president himself, and the presidents followers, supporters, and allies gathered near The White House for a Stop the Steal rally. The president maintained at that rally that the 2020 presidential election had been fraudulently stolen from him. The president addressed his faithful followers thus: Were going to the Capitol. . . . Were going to try and give them [the Republicans in the Congress, presumably] the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country. . . . We will never give up. We will never concede.

Inflamed, the gathered mob marched up the hill from The White House to the United States Capitol to protest, disrupt and prevent the counting of the electoral votes for the presidency, which the president falsely charged were wrongly about to be counted by the Congress in his political opponents winning favor and in his own losing favor.

Once staged at the Capitol, the mob soon erected gallows on the United States Capitol grounds, chanting that Vice President Mike Pence should be hanged. Hanged, the mob chanted, for cowardly refusing the presidents lawless entreaties that his Vice President declare their president reelected, against the will of the American People, though he had lost both the Electoral College and the popular vote for the presidency.

There were many cowards on the battlefield on January 6. The Vice President was not among them.

Soon thereafter, the rioters stormed the Capitol itself, breaching, occupying, and ransacking the temple of our democracy for seemingly endless wrenching hours at the precise democratic moment when the Congress of the United States convened in Joint Session to begin the constitutional counting of the votes for the presidency of the United States.

Not until over three hours after the riot had begun, and then only after the siege had achieved what by that time was its truncated objective to interrupt and indefinitely delay the counting of the vote, did the president finally yield to the pleas and prayers from his own family, friends, and political allies, and grudgingly ask his supporters in a hastily forced video tweet to disperse and return to their homes.

The Nation wept during the evening of January 6, as the Capitol police began to clear and resecure the Capitol at days end. Finally, at 8:00 p.m. on January 6, seven hours after the siege on the Capitol had begun, Vice President Pence gaveled the Joint Session back into order with measured, understated resolve: Today was a dark day in the history of the United States Capitol. . . . Lets get back to work.

January 6 was a dark day in the history of the United States, too.

It was not until the next day, January 7, 2021, at 3:42 a.m. in the morning almost fifteen hours after the Joint Session had first been gaveled into session by Speaker Nancy Pelosi that the Vice President finally declared that Joe Biden had been elected the 46th President of the United States.

On January 6, 2021, the prescribed day for choosing the American president, there was not to be a peaceful transfer of power for the first time in the history of our Republic.

Over a year and a half later, in continued defiance of our democracy, both the former president and his political party allies still maintain that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from him, despite all evidence all evidence now that that is simply false. All the while, this false and reckless insistence that the former president won the 2020 presidential election has laid waste to Americans confidence in their national elections. More alarming still is that the former president pledges that his reelection will not be stolen from him next time around, and his Republican Party allies and supporters obeisantly pledge the same.

False claims that our elections have been stolen from us corrupt our democracy, as they corrupt us. To continue to insist and persist in the false claim that the 2020 presidential election was stolen is itself an affront to our democracy and to the Constitution of the United States an affront without precedent.

Those who think that because America is a republic, theft and corruption of our national elections and electoral process are not theft and corruption of our democracy are sorely mistaken. America is both a republic and a representative democracy, and therefore a sustained attack on our national elections is a fortiori an attack on our democracy, any political theory otherwise notwithstanding.

Accordingly, if, and when, one of our national elections is actually stolen from us, our democracy will have been stolen from us. To steal an election in the United States of America is to steal her democracy.

As in all things, the essence of our participation in democracy is not knowledge, but judgment studied, discerning judgment. No more so is this true than in the Constitution and in the Law.

Very few ever have the honor of counseling the President of the United States of America. That highest of honors carries with it the highest of obligations. Counsel provided to the President of the United States must be the product of not only exquisite, penetrating legal analysis but also profound, insightful legal judgment. These two combined are so far from mere technical legal competence as almost to be its polar opposite. The President and the country deserve nothing less from those who counsel the President, so consequential are the stakes for the Nation when the President acts upon the advice of his or her Counsel.

Whatever else, the President of the United States did not receive such counsel during his sustained effort to overturn the 2020 presidential election. It is as much the former presidents fault as anyones that he did not.

Irrespective of the merits of the legal arguments that fueled the former presidents efforts to overturn that election irrespective of them, though there were none those arguments, and therefore those efforts, by the former president were the product of the most reckless, insidious, and calamitous failures in both legal and political judgment in American history.

From their inception, the legal arguments that underlaid the efforts to overturn the 2020 election were, in that context, little more than beguiling and frivolous, perhaps appropriate for academic classroom debate, but singularly inappropriate as counsel to the President of the United States of America in his effort to overturn the presidential election an election he had lost fair and square and as to which there was not then, and there is not to this day, evidence of fraud.

It is breathtaking that these arguments even were conceived, let alone entertained by the President of the United States at that perilous moment in history.

Had the Vice President of the United States obeyed the President of the United States, America would immediately have been plunged into what would have been tantamount to a revolution within a paralyzing constitutional crisis.

The former presidents accountability under the law for the riot on the United States Capitol on January 6 is incidental to his responsibility and accountability for his attempt to steal the 2020 presidential election from the American People and thereby steal Americas democracy from America herself. This said, willful ignorance of law and fact is neither excuse nor defense in law. Willful ignorance, thus, is neither political nor legal excuse or defense available to the former President of the United States, his allies, and his supporters.

On January 6, 2021, revolutionaries, not patriots, assaulted America and American democracy. The walls of all three of our institutions of democracy were scaled and breached on that appalling day. And almost two years thence, one of Americas two political parties cannot even agree whether that day was good or bad, right or wrong. Worse, it cannot agree over whether January 6 was needed, or not. Needed or not. Pause for a moment and reflect on that. The former president and his party cannot decide whether the revolt at the United States Capitol to disrupt and prevent the constitutional counting of the votes for the presidency was needed, and therefore whether another revolt might be needed at a future date to accomplish that which the previous revolt failed to accomplish.

If one of our national political parties one of the two political guardians of our democracy cannot agree even as to whether the violent riot and occupation of the United States Capitol, inspired by the President of the United States and carried out by his followers to prevent Congress from counting the votes for the presidency of those same United States, was reprehensible insurrection or needed, legitimate political discourse, we all can agree on nothing.

Nor should we.

The former presidents party cynically and embarrassingly rationalizes January 6 as having been something between hallowed, legitimate public discourse and a visitors tour of the Capitol that got out of hand. January 6, of course, was neither, and the former president and his party know that. It was not legitimate public discourse by any definition. Nor was it a civics tour of the Capitol Building though that day proved to be an eye-opening civics lesson for all Americans.

January 6 was, rather, a defining, and a redefining, day in American history defining and redefining of America itself. On that day, America finally came face to face with the raging war that it had been waging against itself for years. So blood-chilling was that day for our democracy, that America could not believe her eyes and she turned them away in both fear and shame. Even so, many have already forgotten, and many more have chosen to forget. Some who rioted and occupied the Capitol that day had already decided how this war for our democracy must end, while others of their compatriots, upon sober reflection afterward, decided that no, no, this war must end now, before there is further bloodshed.

As did we, these latter saw how this war ends, and they realized that no one should want for such end.

For their part, the former president and many of his party remain to this day undecided as to which end of this war they will commit themselves undecided, that is, as to which end they want to commit themselves. To be undecided today as to whether to end this war over our democracy is to have decided how one wants this war to end.

Thus, for the rest of us Americans, the time has come for us to decide whether we allow this war over our democracy to be prosecuted to its catastrophic end or whether we ourselves demand the immediate suspension of this war and insist on peace instead.

We must make this decision because our political leaders are unwilling and unable, even as they recklessly prosecute this war in our name. We Americans begin to make this consequential decision this week, when Congress, rightly if painfully, takes us back to that day in January we want so much to forget but mustnt, and reminds us of what was at stake that day and still, in what is this most unholy of wars.

America is at a perilous crossroads. Who is it that we have become and what is it that America has become? Is this who we want to be and what we want America to be? And if not, just who is it that we Americans want to be? And just what is it that we want our America to be?

Many will again turn their eyes away, miscalculating that this is the last time they must see, and thus remember. The partisan mercenaries, who have no interest in either understanding or peace, will be the first who turn away and, in their determined ignorance, ignore. The mercenaries know better than we that what we forcibly put out of our minds or what we forget, we are destined to repeat.

No American ought to turn away from January 6, 2021, until all of America comes to grips with what befell our country that day, and we decide what we want for our democracy from this day, forward.

The genius that is Americas democracy is this. The Constitution vests all power in We the People. We agreed in the Constitution to delegate our power to our representatives, only during their time in our service, and at that, exclusively for the purpose of representing our interests in the Nations Capital, not theirs. Our democracy is the process through which our representatives, using the power that we have delegated to them, in turn and in trust, govern us. We choose in our national elections those who we want to represent us, including most importantly the President of the United States. It is for this simple reason that to steal an election for the presidency from us is to steal our democracy from us.

Americas democracy was almost stolen from us on January 6.

Our democracy has never been tested like it was on that day and it will never be tested again as it was then if we learn the lessons of that fateful day. On the other hand, if we fail to learn the lessons that are there to be learned, or worse, deny even that there are lessons there to be learned, we will consign ourselves to another January 6 in the not-too-distant future, and another after that, and another after that. While for some, that is their wish, that cannot be our wish for America.

America can withstand attacks on her democracy from without. She is helpless to withstand them from within. The relentless assaults on America and its democracy from within, such as January 6, which designedly call into question the

very legitimacy of the institutions and instrumentalities of our democracy, are simply not contemplated by the Constitution of the United States and are therefore not provided for by that Great Charter for our governance.

America is not in constitutional crisis until and unless the Constitution and the institutions and instrumentalities of our democracy are under withering, unsustainable, and unendurable attack from within. Then, and only then, is the constitutional order in hopeless constitutional disorder. Only then is America in peril. Today, America is in constitutional crisis and at a foreboding crossroads with disquieting parallels to the fateful crossroads we came to over a century and a half ago.

It is no wonder that America is at war over her democracy. Every day for years now we have borne witness to vicious partisan attacks on the bulwarks of that democracy our institutions of government and governance and the institutions and instrumentalities of our democracy by our own political leaders and fellow citizens. Every day for years now we have witnessed vicious partisan attacks on our Institutions of Law themselves, our Nations Judiciary, and our Constitution and the Laws of the United States the guardians of that democracy and of our freedom. For years, we have been told by the very people we trust, and entrust, to preserve and to protect our American institutions of democracy and law that these institutions are no longer to be trusted, no longer to be believed in, no longer deserving of cherish and protection.

If that is true, then it is because those with whom we entrusted these institutions have themselves betrayed our sacred trust.

And, indeed, it does seem at the moment that we no longer agree on our democracy. Nor do we any longer seem to agree on the ideals, values, and principles upon which America was founded and that were so faithfully nurtured and protected by the generations and generations of Americans that came before us. Yet we agree on no other foundational ideals, values, and principles, either.

All of a sudden it seems that we are in violent disagreement over what has made America great in the past and over what will make her great in the future. In poetic tragedy, political campaign slogan has become divisive political truth. And there is no reason to believe that agreement about America by we Americans is anywhere on the horizon, if for no other reason than that none of us is interested in agreement. In the moral catatonic stupor America finds itself in today, it is only disagreement that we seek, and the more virulent that disagreement, the better.

This is not who we Americans are or who we want to be. Nor is this America or what we want America to be.

Reeling from twin wars, leaderless, and rudderless, America is in need of help. Our polarized political leaders have shamefully and shamelessly failed us. They have summoned our worst demons at the very moment when we needed summoned our better angels.

As a consequence, America finds itself in desperate need of either a reawakening and quickening to the vision, truths, values, principles, beliefs, hopes, and dreams upon which the country was founded and that have made America the greatest nation in the world a revival of America and the American spirit.

Or, if it is to be, we are in need of a revival around a new vision, new truths, new values, new principles, new beliefs, new hopes and dreams that hopefully could once again bind our divided nation together into the more perfect union that We the People originally ordained and established it to be.

We cannot hobble along much longer, politically paralyzed and hopelessly divided, directionless and undecided as to which revival it will be if any at all.

Where do we begin? This is the easier question. Who has the patriotic and political courage to go first? This is the harder question.

As to the first question, we begin where the reconciliation of all broken human relationships, be they broken from war, anger, betrayal, or love, begins by talking with each other, and listening to one another again, as human beings and fellow citizens who share the same destiny and the same belief in America and hope for her future. For years now, taking the lead from our politicians, we Americans have spoken only coarse, desensitizing, dehumanizing political vile at each other, which enables us to speak to each other without guilt or regret. For too many years now, we have spoken to each other as charlatanic political gladiators in an arena that today has become annihilative of Americas future, not promising of that future.

By constitutional order, We the People of this great Nation confer upon our elected representatives the power that they are then, by solemn constitutional obligation, directed to wield on our behalf and on Americas behalf. But today our politicians live in a different world from the rest of us, and in a different world than that ordained by the Constitution. They live in a fictional world of divided loyalties between party and country, a world of their own unfaithful making.

Todays politicians believe that they never have to choose between partisan party politics and country, when in fact they are obliged by oath to choose between the two every day, and every day they defiantly refuse to choose. For todays politicians, never the twain shall meet between partisan ambition and country, and never the latter before the former, either. The politicians in todays America only sponsor partisan incitement and only traffic in the same, rather than sponsor bi partisan reason and lead in thoughtful deliberation. They have purposely led us down the road not in the direction toward the bridging of our differences, but in the direction away from the bridging of those differences. They have proven themselves incapable of leading us.

But still, all it would take to turn America around is a consensus among some number of these political leaders who possess the combined necessary moral authority and who would agree to be bound together by patriotic covenant, to stand up, step forward, and acknowledge to the American People that America is in peril.

In order to end these wars that are draining the lifeblood from our country, a critical mass of our two parties political leaders is needed, to whom the remainder would be willing to listen, at least without immediate partisan recrimination. The logic for reconciliation of these wars being waged in America today dictates that this number needs to include a critical mass of leaders from the former presidents political party and that those leaders need to go first. All of these leaders then need to summon first the moral courage and then the political courage, the strength, and the patriotic will to extend their hands, and ask of the others and of all Americans Can we talk? America needs us.

While Memorial Day is still fresh in our minds, we would all do well to remind ourselves of the immortal words spoken to the West Point cadets at the United States Military Academy a half century ago: Duty, Honor, Country. Those three sacred words of profound American obligation were spoken on that occasion to reassure those who had given their lives for their country in the past, and who would give them in the future, that their sacrifice would not be in vain. Those words are as apt today for this occasion as they were on that day for that occasion, if not more.

Then we need to get back to work, and quickly. We need to get back to the solemn business of preserving, protecting, and defending the Constitution of the United States and the United States of America.

The hour is late. God is watching us.

Respectfully,

Michael Luttig

* With my respect to the Select Committee, I did not submit this statement prior to my testimony today pursuant to the Rules of the U.S. House of Representatives, so to avoid any appearance or suggestion that my testimony is that of an interested political party partisan or is on behalf of the Select Committee or any person involved with, on, or after January 6, or is that of a witness in any other way interested in these hearings.

I testify today only as a private citizen, and as a non-partisan, disinterested, independent former Federal Judge on the United States Court of Appeals who happens to have been a fact witness to the events surrounding January 6. The views, the thoughts, and the words herein are mine and mine alone, submitted to the Select Committee on my own behalf and no one elses.

More:
On the Knifes Edge of Democracy - The Bulwark

Op-eds of the week: Gun violence, abortion and threats to democracy – The Fulcrum

Our weekly op-ed highlight reel

The Fulcrum is a forum for debate about what's ailing American democracy and what could make the system healthier. Here are the most recent arguments from our columnists and other contributors.

Jabin Botsford-Pool/Getty Images

While the Jan. 6 hearings have focused on Donald Trumps efforts to subvert the election process, they have also revealed a second but dangerous threat to democracy: efforts to keep people from voting. Even though the 2020 election was the most secure election in history and set turnout records, officials in some states arent trying to build on that success, according to David Levine, an elections integrity fellow at the Alliance for Securing Democracy.

Rather than seeing the wisdom of expanded access, far too many states fueled in part by the same mis- and disinformation arising that contributed to the insurrection are unjustifiably reversing course, creating challenges for their 2022 elections and/or future ones.

Read more.

Ringo Chiu/AFP via Getty Images

Conservatives who fight any limits on gun rights typically point to the late Justice Antonin Scalias landmark opinion in D.C. v. Heller as opening the floodgates to unrestricted gun ownership. But, as author Lawrence Goldstone writes, even that ruling was not absolute, and it overturned two centuries of precedent.

Prior to Heller, the most important ruling on gun rights came in 1939. United States v. Miller found that guns not used as part of a militia are not protected.

The Miller decision attracted little attention at the time, since almost no one interpreted the Second Amendment as anything other than an anachronism, rendered obsolete by the creation of a professional military. And so it remained, despite numerous attempts by gun worshipers to pretend the opening clause did not exist. That they finally found their spiritual bedfellow in the person of a man fond of trumpeting his reverence for the text of the Constitution, who sneered at judges who took into account such silly factors as intent, is the saddest of ironies.

Read more.

AndreyKrav/Getty Images

Voter suppression often conjures thoughts of restricting voting laws, long lines at polling places, and purges of the voter rolls. But there are other, more subtle, ways through which partisans try to keep their opponents from casting ballots.

Gabe Hart, a columnist for the Tennessee Lookout, and John Opdyke, president of Open Primaries, wrote about the confusing state of affairs in the Volunteer State, which requires voters to affiliate with a party to take part in a primary but does not register voters by party. So party officials are threatening criminal charges against voters, even when theres no mechanism to comply with the law they have supposedly broken.

This was not surgical voter suppression. It was a broad intimidation campaign to keep everyone at home except partisan activists.

This is the voter suppression no one talks about partisan politicians using intimidating tactics to lie to voters and keep them from exercising their rights to choose their leaders.

Read more.

Anton Petrus/Getty Images

The impending Supreme Court ruling that is likely to overturn Roe v. Wade will do far more than remove federal protections for abortion rights, according to Robert Pearl, who teaches in both the medical and business programs at Stanford University. It will turn millions of women into instant criminals for practicing otherwise legal habits.

For example:

If a fetus is a living human, then smoking while pregnant would be equivalent to supplying cigarettes to a minor, punishable in most states by a large fine and possible jail time. Added to those penalties is the possibility of applicable child-endangerment laws. After all, nicotine dangerously reduces oxygen supply while smoke inhalation sends carbon monoxide directly to the fetus, both highly damaging. Prenatal heart defects, cleft lip and even miscarriage are just a few of the well-known consequences of smoking or breathing in second-hand smoke during the early part of fetal development. If such behaviors were to result in the death of a fetus, state prosecutors could see fit to charge parents with manslaughter or negligent homicide.

Read more.

Jordi Salas/Getty Images

Perhaps youve been thinking, I feel helpless to make change. Theres nothing an average person can do. If thats the case, or youre just wondering how you can help others, then Caroline Klibanoff has a suggestion for you. The managing director of Made By Us wants you to get involved in the Civic Season.

Running from Juneteenth to July Fourth, the Civic Season brings together more than 150 museums, historic sites and historical societies providing fun, educational opportunities to learn more about America and American values.

She writes:

Many, perhaps even most, of us want to be engaged citizens. It is rewarding to feel that you have a say in the direction of your country, and to activate that power; and it is frustrating to feel that you cant make a difference in nudging the world a bit closer to your own values. Civic Season offers avenues to explore those values, critical context to understand yourself as part of your community/country/world, and paths to take action and be heard.

Additional reading: The stuff democracy is made of

As the hearings probing the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the Capitol got underway, we asked you four questions:

Responses ranged from affirmation to claims of a witch hunt to nuanced approaches.

Read our readers responses.

Read more from the original source:
Op-eds of the week: Gun violence, abortion and threats to democracy - The Fulcrum

Opinion: What is a threat to democracy? – Daily Press

The phrase threat to democracy has been thrown around a lot lately.

New voting rules in states like Georgia and Texas have been described that way, and also described as Jim Crow 2.0. People supporting the new rules have been compared to the likes of virulent segregationists George Wallace, Lester Maddox and Bull Connor.

Not long after all of that hyperbole and specious claims of racism, Georgia voters turned out in record numbers, and compared to the 2018 midterms the vote count was up by about 168%. So much for claims of voter suppression. The showing was a comeuppance for Major League Baseball, other corporate virtue signalers, and federal attempts to nationalize voting rules.

Democratic gubernatorial candidate Stacey Abrams now has an uphill battle. A good starting point might be to finally concede her previous election defeat as caused by something other than voter suppression. That stuff is just Donald Trump 2.0.

There are, however, real threats to our democracy to which we should be paying attention, and January 6 was one of them. One of our nations most longstanding traditions is the voluntary and peaceful transfer of power. It is that crucial distinction that separates us from dictatorial regimes of which the world has far too many; 21st century countries with anachronistic governance that belongs in the dustbin of history.

George Washington led by example by relinquishing the Presidency after two terms, even though the two-election limit would not be imposed until the Truman administration with the passage of the 22nd Amendment.

President Donald Trump was not, and is not, willing to concede his obvious defeat in 2020, even stating in the months leading up to that election that the only way he could lose was if there was widespread voter fraud. The fact that he lost confirmed, in his mind, his prediction, and he continued the Stop the Steal rhetoric to the point that he was trying to get election officials to find votes, and pressuring Vice President Mike Pence to violate his oath to the Constitution by refusing to accept the electoral votes from states Trump wanted to contest.

The result was a whipping to a frenzy of conspiracy theorists, true believers and sunshine patriots who descended on the nations capital and rioted. The rest is history. Such a thing must never happen again.

It is hard to believe that anything equal to or worse than that could happen so soon, but it has beginning when the Senate Majority Leader, Chuck Schumer, stood in front of the Supreme Court and, with clenched fist, raised the specter of Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh reaping the whirlwind and paying the price for their decisions. Threats to pack the Court emanated from Congressional Democrats, and those threats continue.

Now, with respect to the Roe v. Wade decision, we have demonstrations and pure harassment outside the homes of targeted Supreme Court Justices, including a viable death threat. All of that craziness is a threat to democracy. It threatens the independence of the judiciary, the separation of powers and the balance of power. The Supreme Court must not become a vassal to a Congressional majority.

Do we really want to live in a country where justices, judges, juries, prosecutors and defense attorneys are influenced by whoever can muster the largest and noisiest crowds outside the courthouse? The Biden White House, to its shame, has failed to condemn this grossly inappropriate behavior. Apparently, as long as it isnt violent, its fine with this administration.

President Biden should instead use his bully pulpit to condemn any and all attempts to pressure and intimidate jurists and their families. These are little more than 21st century versions of the lynch mobs of the old west and frontier justice, and the people engaged in this grossly inappropriate behavior have no moral standing above the mob behavior that occurred on January 6. This intimidation represents just as grave a threat to democracy one likely to be repeated if we dont put a stop to it right now.

Joseph Filko has taught economics and American government and lives in Williamsburg. He can be reached at jfilko1944@gmail.com

More here:
Opinion: What is a threat to democracy? - Daily Press

Democracy and Colombia: "They have lost respect for us" – The City Paper Bogot

The recent electoral process in Colombia has demonstrated that our democracy has fallen to a very low point.

People on all sides, are voting against a candidate out of fear. Political parties have been completely replaced by personality cults. Candidates are no longer statesmen, but rather, influencers. Politicians representing more of the same are shamelessly heralding their supposed advocacy for change.

Outrageous and criminal behaviors from all sides are condoned by followers. No one apologizes, no one steps aside, no one loses any votes.

We are lied to, expected to vote for wrongdoers, and kept in the dark as a nation. Colombians have voted for candidates that clearly do not represent us for president and for congress. Scandals of corporate bribery at the highest levels are put aside and never properly prosecuted.

Democracy is lacking when each of the mayor news outlets belongs to a family with enormous financial and industrial power, at a national or regional level. The same group that has invested interests in keeping tailor-made regulations, monopolies, contracts for public infrastructure, tax benefits and information privileges, has also the power to erode public trust and support from those in office through their own influential newspaper, radio, or television network.

Many journalists are mere pawns, participating in this debate with clear political or big corporate agendas. Most people will be glad to hear what they want to hear, but the public knows they cannot rely on the media.

Society doesnt matter to big media anymore. Decency is a tagline; honesty is a hashtag; fair and balanced is a clich.

Journalists who try to uncover scandals, must do so through small personal web pages, and they are labeled as communists, or being politically biased or tainted.

Big business is curiously comfortable. No increase in foreign exchange rates could suggest that powerful and well-informed business leaders have a certain sense of trust in that this situation will not affect them as much as one could think. Enormous hostile takeovers are taking place while hundreds are talking about leaving the country.

Why is all of this occurring? How did we fall so low as a nation?

Let me try to explain why: politicians, the media and big business have lost respect for our society.

It is as simple as that. The do not care for us. They do not feel that we deserve to be told the truth. They feel that they are entitled to run the country in any way that suits them. We, the public, are not part of the equation anymore.

I believe that it is time to do something about this before it is too late (if it is not already too late).

The nation must come together and claim once again the right for a solid and transparent democracy, a right for a visible rule of law. Before getting into the necessary discussions of right- and left-wing choices, this nation must become a true democracy first.

Colombians gave up on politics many years ago. It is seen as the business of shady characters. It is an activity full of threats for decent persons who dont know how to survive in such a treacherous and devious world.

But this fear of politics has hurt Colombia way too much. If nothing changes, there will be a hefty price to pay.

The solution is to get the nation back into politics, in an organized, modern, and transparent fashion.

Colombia must build new political parties with national and regional structures. These parties need a well-thought ideological proposition.

Political parties should once again be the place where respectable leaders, thinkers and public administrators are groomed and supported, through specialized organs. Procedures must be in place to hold them accountable when they do not perform properly.

They should have organs for wide participation of the community at national, regional, and local levels.

Organized political parties must exercise influence and power above individuals. They must be the stronghold of democracy, by living up to its principles. They must be the true representatives of their members.

Modern and fresh political parties, I believe, are the only option for building a true, transparent, and participative democracy. This is the only option for the rule of law.

This is the only option that we have if we are to be respected as a society.

If democracy is still a choice, the time is now.

About the author: Jorge Ortiz is a lawyer and MBA. He is a consultant to management.

Continue reading here:
Democracy and Colombia: "They have lost respect for us" - The City Paper Bogot

Opinion: Around the world, the USA is giving democracy a bad name – Gaston Gazette

Herman Myrick| The Gaston Gazette

Losing control of his subjects is the despot dictators worst nightmare. This same fear haunts the kings, military strong men, and other autocrats who rule 119 of the earths 193 member countries of the United Nations.

An article dated Feb. 10, 2022, at bloombergnews.com states that, of the 196 nations or territories of the world, 167 were surveyed by the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) Index of 2021, and were rated as follows:

Of the 167 nations surveyed, 74 are listed as democracies. Just 21 were deemed to be full democracies, representing 6.4% of the worlds population, while 53 countries were listed as flawed democracies.

By total populations, the study found that the percentage of the earths people living under some semblance of democracy fell from 49 to 45 percent.

Democracy in the world is in decline and the USA is contributing to that decline. According to the Bloomberg article, the United States is now considered a flawed democracy and fell one spot to number 26 among the 74 full or flawed democracies.

The worst autocracies of the Bloomberg/EIU INDEX 2022, were Afghanistan, Myanmar, and North Korea.

America was once the envy of the earth. But now, news from America arms dictators, kings, and other autocrats with enough grist for their propaganda mills to convince their imprisoned populations that in America, people with too much freedom are going mad.

Around the world, the USA is giving democracy a bad name.

In a similar study posted online in 2020 by democracymatrix.com, the United States was ranked 36th and classified as a deficient democracy among 83 working or deficient democracies worldwide.

As a matter of information, the highest rated working democracies are Norway, New Zealand, and Finland. The worst rated hard autocracies by democracymatrix.com in 2020 were Yemen, North Korea, and Eritrea.

It is worth noting that as Christianity and church membership has declined in America, so has our standing in the world. Blessed is the nation whose God is the lord…. (Psalms 33:12)

Herman Myrick is a resident of Belmont.

See the original post:
Opinion: Around the world, the USA is giving democracy a bad name - Gaston Gazette