Mediaboss Marketing

The close connections between democracy, creativity, and economic progress are subtle and long-term, but they are real. In the face of a growing authoritarian challenge worldwide, democratic governments must act together to protect them.

NEW YORK During my years as a policymaker in India and at the World Bank, one of the few leaders I met whom I came truly to respect was Madeleine Albright. The former US secretary of state was a master strategist, but behind the strategizing lay empathy and a moral compass. That is why we should take seriously her recent essay on the need for urgent global action to fight authoritarianism, which the all-out invasion of democratic Ukraine by Russias autocratic leader, Vladimir Putin, only serves to underscore.

Subscriber Exclusive

Subscriber Exclusive

History is replete with grotesque forms of human oppression, including slavery, racism, and oligarchies crushing peoples aspirations. Today, the continued rise of authoritarianism in countries such as Brazil, Turkey, and of course Russia highlights the need to shore up democracy. What is new is that this effort now must be global.

Even as the shadow of authoritarian misrule spreads, there is a growing aspiration for democracy among ordinary people seeking greater freedom and dignity. A Pew Research Center survey of 17 advanced economies in 2021 shows disaffection with the lack of individual freedom in authoritarian states at an all-time high. Additionally, according to the survey, a median of 74% of people in these countries had no confidence in Putin doing the right thing in world affairs.

There is also hope in Albrights interesting observation that leaders with totalitarian inclinations tend to rise and fall in waves. Force out one, and others may tumble, too, as happened when the end of authoritarian rule in the Philippines in 1986 was followed by similar developments in Chile, South Africa, Zaire, and Indonesia over the next decade or so. This should encourage responsible governments today to initiate the process of reviving global democracy.

Sadly, the record of the United States is far from clean in that regard. A recent study by the Roosevelt Institutes Kyle Strickland and Felicia Wong points to how Americas neoliberal economic policies fueled discrimination and inequity in many countries. Moreover, in Chile, Cuba, Central America, and elsewhere, America has intervened, often brutally, not to support democracy but to protect US corporate interests. Providing leadership to isolate authoritarian regimes and nurture democracy will thus require the US to break with significant aspects of its past and take on this responsibility as its moral obligation to chart a new course for the world.

But to rely wholly or substantially on the US would be folly. To be sure, some US presidents notably, Franklin Roosevelt, Harry Truman, Jimmy Carter, and Barack Obama have possessed a strong sense of global responsibility. Fortunately, many prominent Americans, including current political leaders, take a similar stance. Yet, as Donald Trump demonstrated, a US leader can be elected by promising to make America great again, and, once in office, define America as his friends, family, and cronies.

Our newest magazine, The Year Ahead 2022: Reckonings, is here. To receive your print copy, delivered wherever you are in the world, subscribe to PS for less than $9 a month.

As a PS subscriber, youll also enjoy unlimited access to our On Point suite of premium long-form content, Say More contributor interviews, The Big Picture topical collections, and the full PS archive.

Subscribe Now

While many justify the need for democracy as a means to other desirable ends, I believe that democracy is necessary in itself. If it were the case that democracy slowed economic growth, we should be prepared to grow a little less in order to let equality and freedom flourish. This is because the commitment to treat all human beings as equals, as democracy requires, is an ethical axiom. As Abraham Lincoln put it in a handwritten note in 1858, As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a master. This expresses my idea of democracy.

That said, the evidence suggests that democracy is a key ingredient of economic advancement. By creating the space for dissent, criticism, and change, democracy nurtures creativity and innovation, and, through that, economic flourishing. Economic progress in countries that succumb to religious fundamentalism or authoritarianism almost invariably stalls. China seems to be an exception, but it is worth noting that democratic Taiwans GDP per capita is nearly three times that of China.

One of the best examples of what democracy can do is post-independence India, one of the worlds most audacious experiments in creating and nurturing an open society. The country undoubtedly made some economic-policy mistakes over the last 75 years, and its annual growth rate in the early decades after independence remained low, at around 3%. But the democratic investment meant that, despite being a poor country, India did well in higher education, research, the arts, and other creative fields.

The pickup in Indias economic growth from the early 1990s onward had many causes, but it also reflected the democratic dividend. Because of the countrys political openness and freedom of speech and criticism, the services sector, which relies on creative human capital, began to bloom, fostering the growth of firms like Infosys, Wipro, and Tata Consultancy Services. By 2005, India was among the worlds four or five fastest-growing economies. Its sophisticated polity had made the country a global success story, poised for a remarkable run.

This success has come under a cloud in recent years with an increase in restrictions on free speech and the media. Not surprisingly, Indias GDP growth decelerated each year from 2017 to 2020. The close connections between democracy, creativity, and economic progress are subtle and long-term, but they are real. And they demonstrate clearly the need to encourage democratization worldwide.

View original post here:
Protecting the Democratic Dividend by Kaushik Basu - Project Syndicate

They dress like students, or dress like housewives, or in a suit and a tie. Life during wartime in Ukraine the kind of conflict that Europe thought it would never see in the 21st century is less than a week old and producing some shocking images that practically no one expected. Certainly not the Russian dictator Vladimir Putin, who almost surely thought that a westward-looking democracy sated by McDonalds and KFC would instantly melt under the shock and awe of his powerful armed forces. Instead, a generation raised in relative comfort and prosperity is making the same existential choice their grandparents made during World War II.

Freedom is worth fighting for. And dying for, if necessary.

And so the grim carnage in Eastern Europe has been interrupted by heroic scenes of resistance. Weve seen the stylish 20-something Kyiv couple of Yarina Arieva and Svyatoslav Fursinb who moved up their wedding and took a honeymoon photo toting the rifles each had been issued to defend their home city from Russian invaders. And the videos of architects and accountants and teachers forming armed patrols, or mixing deadly Molotov cocktails to toss at armored vehicles in an attack with the techniques they learned on YouTube.

In the northern Ukraine village of Bakhmach, a column of Russian tanks one of the convoys that Putin had hoped would crush Russias western neighbor in a few days if not hours had to pause when an elderly man tried to climb aboard the lead vehicle, then kneeled in front of it. It was a callback to the legendary Tank Man in Chinas Tiananmen Square in 1989, except some 33 years later this didnt feel like a symbolic gesture against the irresistible power of a modern authoritarian state. This time, it feels like freedom has a fighting chance.

Its been less than four days since Putins Russia did the unthinkable that has been months if not years in the making, and invaded Ukraine. The fate of the war is clearly up in the air Russias military superiority and the ability of a massive nation to wreak havoc with brute force is clear, but Putins generals clearly didnt calculate on large-scale resistance either from Ukrainians on the ground or from a global community that has rallied on their behalf. Team Putin expected the largest cities of Kyiv and Kharkiv to fall overnight and that didnt happen, not yet.

But this much is clear: The war in Ukraine has become a time for choosing not just for its combatants and for the 144 million citizens of Putins Russia, but for people all around the world, including here in the United States. The first two decades of the 21st century have been marked by declining faith in democracy and a rising authoritarianism thats played out from Beijing to Belarus to Bakersfield sometimes as tragedy but often as farce.

Today, some of the silliness of our cultural wars over the fake banning of hamburgers or the canceling of Dr. Seuss is melting away as an honest-to-goodness war demands that people pick a side. Do you support the messiness of democracy as embodied, however imperfectly, by Ukraine and its courageous people, or will some folks continue to support the decadence embodied by weak strongmen like Putin, Xi Jinping, and Donald Trump, whose last resort in defending ancient systems of repression is the barrel of a tank?

The starkness of that choice is embodied by two remarkable men at the center of the world stage. In unleashing his tanks and missiles against the 44 million peaceful people of Ukraine as they were merely trying to live their best lives, Putin has revealed himself for once and for all not as a crafty practitioner of realpolitik but rather as a monster willing to mine the moral depths of an Adolf Hitler or a Joseph Stalin to keep himself in power. Just as Trump proved to the American people on Jan. 6, 2021, that all egomaniacal strongmen finally turn to violence against the free will of people, Putins descent into isolation and incoherence is showing us where that bloody road ultimately leads on a world map.

Meanwhile, Ukraines Volodymyr Zelensky a former TV comedian who once competed on Ukraines version of Dancing with the Stars and whose unlikely political rise began when he played an everyday citizen-elected president after a viral video has emerged as democracys first true icon of a new, troubled millennium. The 44-year-old Zelensky is showing that his unfairly maligned Generation X can fight with the courage and resolve of World War IIs so-called Greatest Generation when everything is truly on the line.

The Ukrainian president is using the tools of todays technology shooting a cell phone selfie video of himself and his cabinet standing strong in the streets of Kyiv as the capital city was bombarded by Russian forces to reinvent himself as a Winston Churchill for the 21st century. Zelensky is doing this not with blood, sweat, toil, and tears bombast but with a movingly simple, and-I-am-telling-you-Im-not-going courage, reportedly responding to an American offer to evacuate him from Kyiv by saying, I need ammunition, not a ride. The Ukrainians and their leader are winning the battle for world opinion in a rout.

READ MORE: Boomer fantasies of world peace die in Ukraine | Will Bunch Newsletter

Even in the streets of Moscow and in Putins native St. Petersburg, thousands of everyday Russians have taken to the streets and risked their own freedom in calling for peace and decrying the insanity of their own leader. Each day brings new instances of prominent Russians saying no to Putins leadership, from tennis star Andrey Rublev writing No war please on a TV camera to the head of a state-run theater in Moscow resigning because she refuses to work for a killer.

Support for Ukraine has come from spontaneous anti-Russian demonstrations in cities as big as London and as small as Harrisburg and from everyday people in free European nations like Poland opening their arms and even their homes to the first wave of Ukrainian refugees, to the worlds democratic leaders from Washington to Berlin who normally bicker about everything finding near unanimity in tough sanctions against Russia, Putin, and his billionaire cronies.

This reaffirmation of faith in democracy hasnt only bolstered the Ukrainian spirit of resistance. Its also made the worlds anti-democracy naysayers from Beijing to the inner councils of the Republican National Committee look remarkably small. Suddenly, the Americans who praised Putin and his dictatorial maneuvers as genius the most prominent cases being Trump and Fox News prime-time star Tucker Carlson are looking as historically wrong as Charles Lindbergh and his America First-ers did in 1941. The tectonic plates of world opinion are shifting powerfully under their feet, and they are unable to gain their footing.

From the far-left to the far-right, this dramatic weekend has seen a seemingly heartfelt apology from the journalist Matt Taibbi for his descent into the Putin-apologizing dirtbag left and some attempts at pro-democracy reinvention from GOPers like Wisconsin Sen. Ron Johnson, who famously spent July 4, 2018, in Moscow with some of his colleagues. But others on the wrong side of current history including the America First PAC conference backed by two sitting members of Congress on the extreme white supremacist right dug in. Meanwhile, the House Republicans who tweeted a picture of President Joe Biden walking away from a podium and called him weak (what was he supposed to do, moonwalk like Michael Jackson?) made a mockery of Americans rallying round the flag in a global crisis.

Trump, the Wests Putin-apologist-in-chief, whose 2016 election was openly backed by the Kremlin chief with the goal of destabilizing democracy, tried to have it every which way when he addressed the Conservative Political Action Committee, or CPAC, on Saturday night in Orlando, Fla. The 45th president was forced by events to acknowledge that Russias invasion is an outrage and that Zelensky is a brave man, while he also contended against all evidence that Putin is smart, but the real problem is that our leaders are dumb. The moral emptiness of Trumps posturing was made clear when Fox News asked him in an interview if he had a message for Putin.

I have no message, responded Trump. Ditto for Carlson and the GOPs ascendant right-wing. The nakedness of their worldview has been exposed.

Today, the issue is the survival of Ukraine itself. But once this immediate crisis is resolved, the broader fight to shore up democracy begins, and nowhere will that battle take on greater importance than right here in the United States. This is what that looks like: Real justice against the coup plotters of Jan. 6, making sure the rights of citizens to vote are expanded and not further shrunk, standing up for free speech in our classrooms and in the public square, and isolating and scorning the appeasers and the apologists like Trump and Carlson.

The late Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said that a man dies when he refuses to stand up for that which is right. Zelensky and the people of Ukraine are not only standing up for what is right, they are risking their lives to do so. The rest of the world must support them. This aint no party, this aint no disco, this aint no fooling around. The time for choosing has arrived. Which side are you on?

READ MORE: SIGN UP: The Will Bunch Newsletter

Read more here:
War in Ukraine demands that all of us pick a side: democracy or decadence | Will Bunch - The Philadelphia Inquirer

Everything has changed. Russian President Vladimir Putin didn't just want two regions in eastern Ukraine after all. And he doesnt just want Ukraine. Putin wants to dismantle the rules-based, post-World War II international order that delivered an unprecedented period of peace and prosperity to Europe.

Whatever Joe Biden signed up for as a candidate, then nominee, and finally U.S. president, is gone. That battle to restore the soul of America, the plans to dramatically alter the social safety net, that is over. With little remaining political capital, Biden must still work to contain a pandemic and manage the economy, but he has a different job now, with challenges that neither he nor his party envisioned or preferred.

Stabilizing democracy at home and abroad, using his time and energy to combat indifference to threats to freedom among Americans, while countering authoritarian forces overseas this is the best use of the presidential bully pulpit and Bidens best hope for a legacy.

Its time to put the bickering over Build Back Better behind him. Let Sen. Bernie Sanders bark into the wind. Joe Biden can expect the remainder of his presidency to be full of inflation, international crises, and when Republicans will likely control the House of Representatives next winter, impeachment. There is nothing bright on the horizon, which means Biden has little left to risk or lose.

At 82, he will be too old for a second term in the Oval Office, and his exit will unleash an even more volatile period in our politics. There are likely to be open contests in both parties, probably dominated by the craziness of Donald Trump running again, and in the Democratic Party the bitter division between progressive and moderates.

The time to treat both the threats to the constitutional order at home and the liberal order around the world as an emergency is now. Not next year after the midterm elections, or the following year when Biden will most likely be serving his final months. The leader of the free world must treat these threats to the free world as paramount, above all other concerns. He must affirm that in America, and around the world, people must support a system of rules that does not accept an unprovoked attack on a sovereign nation, or a sustained attempt to overturn a free and fair election.

At a summit on democracy he hosted in December, Biden said: The choices we make at this moment are going to fundamentally determine the direction our world is going to take in the coming decades. Those words were true then. Thanks to Vladimir Putin, they are even truer now.

A continued threat from Russia may consume the rest of Bidens term, and require him to hold the alliance together not only to counter Putins ambition, but to confront the fallout of what Russias actions do to embolden China in Taiwan and Hong Kong.

To begin, Biden must keep talking to war-weary Americans throughout this crisis about Russias intentions and the threats they pose to the world and to us. He found the right words last week to warn of the cost our country will absorb while fighting for freedom elsewhere.

I will do everything in my power to limit the pain the American people are feeling at the gas pump. This is critical to me, Biden said. But this aggression cannot go unanswered. If it did, the consequences for America would be much worse. America stands up to bullies. We stand up for freedom. This is who we are.

Biden must stand up to the bullies in the Republican party not to defend his own actions against their attacks on his weakness, but to call out their lies that strengthen Putins hand. Before the Kremlins land grab had officially begun, Putin scored a victory when Trump offered high praise that was echoed by the man who served as Trumps secretary of state. Both backtracked slightly in their CPAC remarks as the world turned against Putin in solidarity with Ukraine, but the damage was done.

Trump first used the word genius to describe Putins invasion. His longer description of Putins prowess was pure, Russian state television propaganda. Heres a guy that says, you know, Im going to declare a big portion of Ukraine independent he used the word independent and were going to go out and were going to go in and were going to help keep peace, Trump said. You got to say, thats pretty savvy.

Savvy isnt as shocking as peace and independent.

Mike Pompeo West Point graduate, congressman, CIA director and secretary of state initially flattered Putin as very shrewd, very capable, and said he has enormous respect for him.

All of this, of course, has been echoed by influential right-wing voices. Media stars and Trumpkin celebrities have also praised Putin for his strength, or have chosen to sneer at and mock any criticism of him. The statements from Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon, Candace Owens, Charlie Kirk, Roger Stone, and Michael Flynn have incorporated Russian talking points laying blame for Putins invasion with NATO and America.

Biden cannot reverse the rot in our political landscape. But he can seek to educate, energize, and unite Americans around the preservation of liberty and democracy. He can start with the left of his party, where some fringe populist, isolationist, and protectionist voices hold sway. And Biden should warn the our own backyard crowds in both parties of the costs of ignoring our leadership role on the world stage.

Biden could also explain to his own voters that their party is likely to lose power quite soon, perhaps for a long time. Democrats have failed to reckon with the coming threat of being in the wilderness. They do not tell their voters that by abandoning rural America and prioritizing urban America, they have bolstered the structural advantages the GOP enjoys in the electoral college and the U.S. Senate. Biden, perhaps because he served a small state for so long in the Senate, does not tell them this.

With the inexorable erosion of ticket-splitting, there will soon be no more Joe Manchins in West Virginia and Jon Testers in Montana. Red states will have red senators.

If Biden and his party are passive in the face of these perversions of democracy, Americans will remain detached. If he doesnt champion the sovereignty of free people around the world, Americans will remain detached. He may not succeed, but Biden himself said we must meet this moment with the knowledge it will determine the course of the world for the foreseeable future.

In the contest between democracy and autocracy, between sovereignty and subjugation, Biden said last week, freedom will prevail.

We dont know that it will. But if an American president, at this dark hour, doesnt fight like hell to preserve freedom, it simply cannot prevail.

A.B. Stoddard is associate editor of RealClearPolitics and a columnist.

See the article here:
Biden Should Spend Next Three Years Focused on Democracy - RealClearPolitics

Join with AP photojournalists in conversation about how the free press plays an essential role in sustaining an informed democracy.

March 3, 6-7:30 p.m.NKUs Griffin Hall, admission is free or attend virtuallyRSVP by CLICKING HEREPresented with support from Kentucky Humanities

Even as democracy is threatened in the world, it has been under fire, too, in our own nation. On May 25, 2020, George Floyd was killed in police custody awakening national protests. On Jan. 6, 2021, the nations Capitol was stormed by a mob that wanted to overturn a presidential election.

Kim Johnson Flodin, Julio Cortez, and Andrew Harnik

Covering both was the Associated Press, the news service that provides coverage of events in our home communities, in the nation and around the world. Today, AP reporters and photographers are in Ukraine, covering the outbreak of a war.

On Thursday, March 3, at 6 p.m., three AP photojournalists who have been in the thick of the events of the past few years, will visit Northern Kentucky University to talk about their work. The powerful images have helped to tell the story of America in our times.

The three are:

Kim Johnson Flodin, a deputy news directors based in Chicago, and one of APs photo editors who direct coverage.

Julio Cortez, staff photographer, and part of the 2021 Pulitzer Prize winning team of AP photographers his widely published photo taken on the night of May 28 in riot-torn Minneapolis shows a lone, silhouetted protester running with an upside-down American flag past a burning liquor store.

Andrew Harnik, staff photographer, is based in Washington, DC, and was among the AP team who covered the storming of the Capitol. His work has taken him around the world with top U.S. diplomats and all over the country with presidents and candidates for president.

Read more from the original source:
Democracy and the Press: Join an NKU Six@Six conversation about the free press' role in democracy - User-generated content

Ukraine's ambassador told the world that if his country is crushed, international peace and democracy are in peril, as the United Nations General Assembly held a rare emergency session in a day of frenzied diplomacy at the UN about the days-old war.

Ukraine is paying now the ultimate price for freedom and security of itself and all the world," Ambassador Sergiy Kyslytsya said at the assemblys first emergency meeting in decades.

If Ukraine does not survive... international peace will not survive. If Ukraine does not survive, the United Nations will not survive," he said. Have no illusions. If Ukraine does not survive, we cannot be surprised if democracy fails next.

Russian Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia reiterated his country's assertions that what it calls a special military operation in defense of two breakaway areas in Ukraine is being misrepresented.Russian actions are being distorted and thwarted," he said.

As Russian and Ukrainian officials held talks on the Belarus border, the UNs two major bodies the 193-nation General Assembly and the more powerful 15-member Security Council both scheduled meetings Monday on the war. In Geneva, the UN Human Rights Council voted to hold its own urgent session.

The assembly session will give all UN members an opportunity to speak about the war and to vote on a resolution later in the week. U.S. Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield said Sunday the measure would hold Russia to account for its indefensible actions and for its violations of the UN Charter.

Israel's ambassador to the United Nations, Gilad Erdan, voiced his support for his Ukrainian counterpart, Sergiy Kyslytsya, at the opening of the emergency session. Kyslytsya visited Israel last year and assisted in gaining support for the successful passage of an Israeli-initiated resolution against Holocaust denial last month.

"The guns are talking now, but the path of dialogue must always remain open, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres told the assembly. We need peace now.

The Security Council meeting, set for later Monday, was focused on the humanitarian impact of Russias invasion. French President Emmanuel Macron sought the session to ensure the delivery of aid to growing numbers of those in need in Ukraine.

French Ambassador Nicolas de Riviere said Sunday that France and Mexico would propose a resolution to demand the end of hostilities, protection of civilians, and safe and unhindered humanitarian access to meet the urgent needs of the population. He said it would probably be put to a vote Tuesday.

Both meetings follow Russias veto Friday of a Security Council resolution demanding that Moscow immediately stop its attack on Ukraine and withdraw all troops. The vote was 11-1, with China, India and the United Arab Emirates abstaining.

Last week, Ukraine asked for a special session of the General Assembly to be held under the so-called Uniting for Peace resolution. It was initiated by the United States and adopted in November 1950 to circumvent vetoes by the Soviet Union during the 1950-53 Korean War.

That resolution gives the General Assembly the power to call an emergency session to consider matters of international peace and security when the Security Council is unable to act because of the lack of unanimity among its five veto-wielding permanent members -- the United States, Russia, China, Britain and France.

The U.S. ambassador told the council after Sundays vote that members had taken an important step forward in holding Russia accountable for its unjustifiable assault, fabricated out of lies and the rewriting of history, and now all nations can be heard in the General Assembly.

Albanian Ambassador Ferit Hoxha called Sundays resolution historic because it opens the big doors of the place where the world meets -- the UN General Assembly -- to speak out and condemn an unprovoked and unjustified pure act of aggression.

Russia must be stopped in its attempt to break the international rules-based order to replace it with its will, he said. All member states, especially the small ones like mine which constitute the majority of the UN, must remember that international law rules and the UN Charter are their best friend, their best army, their best defense, their best insurance.

During the council meeting, many speakers called for diplomatic efforts to peacefully settle the crisis, and said they would be watching Ukraine-Russia meeting expected to take place on the Belarus border Monday.

Jonathan Lis contributed to this report.

See the original post here:
Democracy will not survive if Ukraine falls, envoy tells UN ahead of Russia vote - Haaretz