Archive for the ‘Democracy’ Category

Cronyism and the Conservatives: is the UKs democracy for sale? – The Week UK

Is the UKs democracy for sale, asked the Financial Times. Reporters from this newspaper have revealed the existence of a select coterie of financiers and grandees who belong to an invitation-only club known as the Advisory Board and who enjoy frequent, direct access to Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak.

The price of membership? Big donations to the Conservative Party, some as high as 250,000. What they discuss with ministers is not minuted. The very existence of the board is not documented. It exists in a shadowy world of privileged access.

Orchestrating it all is the Tory party co-chairman Ben Elliot, the founder of Quintessentially, a concierge service that caters to the super-rich: it secures restaurant reservations and society invitations; it advises on the best schools; it has even sourced albino peacocks for a Jennifer Lopez party.

Thats fine in business; but allowing wealth to facilitate access should not happen in government. Property developers, for instance, have paid 18m into Tory coffers since 2019. With major planning reforms in the works, thats a clear conflict of interest.

Elliot is certainly well connected, said Robert Mendick in The Daily Telegraph: colleagues call him Mr Access All Areas. Hes the nephew of the Duchess of Cornwall and, by marriage, the Prince of Wales. It recently emerged that he arranged for a telecoms multimillionaire and philanthropist called Mohamed Amersi a Quintessentially client to have dinner with Prince Charles at Dumfries House in Scotland in 2013. Amersi later donated 1.2m to Prince Charless charities, and has given 750,000 to the Tory party.

Amersis meeting with Charles has caused a minorfurore, said Sean OGrady in The Independent. But should we really care if social-climbing plutocrats meet the heir to the throne? Yes, they might try to arrange favours in return for donating to the Princes charities. But theyd be disappointed: Prince Charles has no real power and very little influence.

Come to that, theres nothing wrong with donating to a political party, said Daniel Hannan on Conservative Home or with being a property developer. We know about these donations because they were duly registered with the Electoral Commission. Theres nothing furtive or sinister about them.

I disagree, said Sean ONeill in The Times. Amersi used the euphemism access capitalism to describe how his wealth opened doors, allowing him to wine and dine with the Prime Minister. This case came soon after a report describing how the disgraced financier Lex Greensill had enjoyed extraordinarily privileged access to David Camerons government. And we have heard how friends and associates of MPs were able to wangle lucrative PPE contracts.

If this was happening in Iraq, Zimbabwe or Venezuela, wed call it what it is: corruption. The easy access to power granted to those with the fattest wallets is having a corrosive effect on trust in government and public life.

Read more from the original source:
Cronyism and the Conservatives: is the UKs democracy for sale? - The Week UK

Former U.N. Adviser Says Global Spyware Is A Threat To Democracy – NPR

Israeli company NSO Group's spyware was used to spy on journalists, human rights activists and political dissidents in several countries. A former U.N. adviser says this type of spyware is a threat to democracy. Jack Guez/AFP via Getty Images hide caption

Israeli company NSO Group's spyware was used to spy on journalists, human rights activists and political dissidents in several countries. A former U.N. adviser says this type of spyware is a threat to democracy.

Spyware made by the Israeli company NSO Group was used to spy on journalists, human rights activists and political dissidents in several countries, according to The Washington Post and other media organizations.

NSO Group says it sells its spyware to governments to track terrorists and criminals. But the Post found the Pegasus spyware was used in "attempted and successful hacks of 37 smartphones belonging to journalists, human rights activists, business executives and the two women closest to murdered Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi."

David Kaye, a former United Nations special rapporteur on freedom of expression, calls the private spyware industry a threat to democracy. Spyware often can collect pretty much anything on a target's phone without them even knowing: emails, call logs, text messages, passwords, usernames, documents and more.

"We are on the precipice of a global surveillance tech catastrophe, an avalanche of tools shared across borders with governments failing to constrain their export or use," he writes with Marietje Schaake in the Post.

Kaye has been speaking about the dangers of spyware abuse for years. He's now a law professor at the University of California, Irvine. He talked with NPR's Morning Edition.

On governments conducting surveillance on people in other countries

This gets at the fundamental problem. There is no international law that governs the use of this technology across borders. There have been cases where foreign governments have conducted spying of people in the United States. So, for example, the Ethiopian government several years ago conducted a spying operation against an Ethiopian American in Maryland. And yet this individual had no tools to fight back. And that's the kind of problem that we're seeing here right now: essentially transnational repression, but we lack the tools to fight it.

On dangers to people beyond those directly targeted

If you think about the kind of surveillance that we're talking about, foreign governments having access to individual journalists or activists or others, that in itself is a kind of direct threat to individuals. But it goes even beyond that. I mean, there are many, many cases that show that this kind of surveillance technology has been used against individuals or the circle of individuals who then face some serious consequence, some of whom have been arrested even to suffer the worst consequence, such as murder, as there's actually indication that people around the Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi were surveilled both before and after his disappearance and murder by the Saudi government a few years back.

On spyware's threat to democracy

Spyware is aimed in many of these situations at the very pillars of democratic life. It's aimed at the journalists and the opposition figures, those in dissent that we've been talking about. And yet there's this very significant problem that it's lawless. I mean, it's taking place in a context without governance by the rule of law.

And that's essentially what we're calling for. We're calling for this kind of industry to finally be placed under export control standards, under other kinds of standards so that its tools not only are more difficult to transfer, but are also used in a way that is consistent with fundamental rule of law standards.

Chad Campbell and Jan Johnson produced and edited the audio interview. James Doubek produced for the web.

Original post:
Former U.N. Adviser Says Global Spyware Is A Threat To Democracy - NPR

US democracy faces a momentous threat, says Joe Biden but is he up for the fight? – The Guardian

Few in the audience applauding Joe Biden could have questioned the sincerity of his warning about a momentous threat to American democracy.

But they may have walked away with lingering doubts about his ability to meet the moment or answer fears that even the office of the presidency will be found politically impotent in the face of the challenge.

Were facing the most significant test of our democracy since the civil war, Biden said in a speech on Tuesday in Philadelphia, recalling the mid-19th-century conflict that left more than 600,000 people dead. The Confederates back then never breached the Capitol as insurrectionists did on January the 6th.

The president added pointedly: Im not saying this to alarm you; Im saying this because you should be alarmed.

Yet while Biden was praised by voting rights activists for correctly diagnosing the sickness, albeit somewhat belatedly, he was criticised for failing to offer a cure. He concluded his 24-minute speech with the exhortation Weve got to act! but did not provide a battle plan.

At stake are the basic principles of democracy: who gets to vote, how they exercise that right and who gets to decide what vote counts. Since Bidens victory over Donald Trump last November a result that Trump and many Republicans refuse to accept, citing bogus claims of fraud that right has been under a coordinated, relentless assault as never before in modern times.

This year 17 states have enacted 28 new laws to make it harder for people to vote. There have been nearly 400 voter suppression bills introduced in 48 states, according to the Brennan Center for Justice.

Some measures aim to reverse the vote-by-mail expansion that was put in place in the 2020 election due to the coronavirus pandemic. Others try to strengthen voter identification requirements, curtail hours and locations for early voting and ballot drop-offs or increase the risk that voters could be intimidated by poll watchers.

Campaigners say that people of color, young people and poor people would be the biggest losers. These groups are generally more likely to vote Democratic than Republican. Civil rights leaders met Biden at the White House earlier this month and appear to have convinced him that the 21st-century Jim Crow assault is real, as he put it on Tuesday.

The speech in Philadelphia, the birthplace of American democracy, was a good first step, according to Chris Scott, chief political officer of the group Democracy for America. I think thats what a lot of us, especially in the progressive movement, have been calling for, he said.

The part that really stuck with me was invoking Congressman John Lewis in saying, Freedom is not a state; it is an act. And so thats why I say the speech is the first part but we are asking him to take action on this.

Never once in his remarks did Biden mention Washington DCs version of the F-word: filibuster. This arcane procedural rule in the Senate enables the minority to block debate on legislation. Last month Republicans used the filibuster to stall the For the People Act, which would create national standards for voting that could prevent some of the restrictions imposed by red states.

Former president Barack Obama has called the filibuster a Jim Crow relic, a reference to its long history of thwarting civil rights legislation. Biden, who served in the Senate for 36 years, could push for its abolition or reform from his bully pulpit and by privately making the case to sceptical Democratic senators such as Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona.

Scott continued: We cannot get any meaningful reforms passed as long as we still have this filibuster in place and so one of the greater problems is seeing him be able to have the ability of some of his predecessors. I think of Lyndon B Johnson and how he was able to leverage his experience in the United States Senate to get his own party members to fall in line.

When we have members like Joe Manchin, like Kyrsten Sinema, we have to have them actually fall in line because what were seeing is Mitch McConnell do what he does best. Whether or not hes majority leader or minority leader, he always finds a way to handcuff whatever progress we actually want to get done.

Fears were expressed during the Democratic primary campaign that Biden is a boxer, not a fighter, whose faith in an age of political chivalry and bipartisanship is ill-suited to the bloodsport of the Trump era. On Tuesday he urged the passage of both the For the People Act a national imperative and John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act but both appear doomed under current Senate rules.

In an interview with the Reuters news agency following the speech, the civil rights leader Al Sharpton pointed out that Biden did not mention the filibuster, adding that he had just spoken to the president. And he said to me just now, Al, were still working through where we are going to be on that. Hes not committed yet.

Bidens passivity on the issue was thrown into sharp relief by more than 50 Democratic legislators who abruptly flew out of Texas in an attempt to derail Republican efforts to pass voting restrictions in the state. The group came to Washington, gave impassioned speeches outside the US Capitol and met Kamala Harris, the vice-president who is leading White House efforts on voting rights.

Leah Greenberg, co-executive director of the progressive grassroots movement Indivisible, said: Its inspiring, its exactly what should be happening. Everybody in the country should be looking at what they are doing and asking themselves, how do I fight just as hard for the right to vote as these Texas Democrats are doing?

One, theyre holding up the legislative process, but two theyre making a stand and actually bringing that fight to Washington and seeking help from the federal government and now its on all of us to rally to that cry.

Greenberg also urged Democrats to be similarly aggressive regarding the filibuster. Both Manchin and Sinema, while theyre clear that they will not abolish the filibuster, have in the past both entertained discussions around reforming it to try to return it to its real purpose, from the talking filibuster to things like having quorum limits go down over time.

These are the kinds of things that the Democratic caucus should be talking about, because the idea that we are going to fundamentally leave our democracy unprotected because of this legislative loophole from the late 1700s is just absurd.

She added: Fundamentally, President Biden could say that out loud. He hasnt yet even called for reform so for him to say, Im doing everything I can when he literally hasnt even made the call for legislative reform that would be necessary to pass the For the People Act just doesnt pass the smell test.

Some Democrats are seeking creative ways to break the stalemate. James Clyburn, the House majority whip, has suggested creating a carve-out to the filibuster for legislation applicable to election law or other constitutional changes, which would give Democrats a way to pass their voting rights bills with a simple majority, rather than 60 votes.

Clyburn, who arguably did more than anyone to secure Bidens victory in the Democratic primary, told reporters on Wednesday: I think President Biden should weigh in. All I want him to do is express support for it.

Biden has also argued that legislation is not the only tool, noting that the justice department will challenge the onslaught of voting rights restrictions and focus on dismantling racially discriminatory laws. One such intervention is already under way in Georgia.

But the issue continues to threaten Democratic unity and shine a light on the limits of the presidency or the man who currently holds that office. Adam Jentleson, executive director of the pressure group Battle Born Collective, said in a statement: On voting rights, President Joe Biden is failing to meet the moment.

There is a wide gap between his rhetoric and his leadership. In his speech, he described the conservative assault on our democracy as an existential threat, yet he refused to endorse the obvious solution, which is to pass voting rights legislation and reform the filibuster to do so, if necessary.

View original post here:
US democracy faces a momentous threat, says Joe Biden but is he up for the fight? - The Guardian

Democrats Can Win House in 2022 by Courting Pro-Democracy Republicans – The New Republic

Democrats need to start showing up in Scott County. As of this writing, there is no Democratic county chair. They need to start listening to people and admitting that our standard 10-point plans too often leave out how to create meaningful change for these places and many who live there. This Other America is key to a Democratic future. Any candidate who doesnt devote time and energy to these places is making a strategic blunder.

A tailored, place-based economic message is crucial. While pro-democracy Republicans may create the opportunity, Democrats will need to drive a message that focuses on the economic recovery and the benefits of the Rescue Plan, the Jobs Plan, and the Families Plan. In different districts, different elements of the recovery will resonate. They key is identifying how the recovery is benefiting real people.

Finally, in every district, the 2022 election needs to start today. In too many red districts, there is an issue and media echo chamber. The only voices on national policy are locally elected Republicans. For voters who rely on local news, it is a one-sided conversation.

It does not cost a lot of time or effort to change that conversation. As important as our issue forums were as an organizing tool, they were even more important as a means of taking the debate to the Republicans representing East Tennessee. The issue forums generated a front-page story, a lead business story, and an editorial in the largest local newspaper in the district, as well as a top story on local news one night. The issue forums forced Fleischmann into responding that he was vehemently opposed to the American Jobs Plan, only to go on Fox News a few weeks later suggesting a bipartisan alternativewhich he then voted against.

See original here:
Democrats Can Win House in 2022 by Courting Pro-Democracy Republicans - The New Republic

Can democracy survive a generation that doesn’t care to be informed? – theday.com

Sitting in my eighth-grade classroom, I stealthily check my email, hoping for news updates from The New York Times or CNN about the heightened COVID-19 crisis in India, my country of origin.

Before I can even read a word on the page, a boy in my class asks, Why are you reading the news?

Yeah, my friend adds. Shreyas a boomer.

The whole class erupts into laughter and my face heats as I slowly close my email tab.

If you dont know what a boomer is, Ill keep it simple: I was called the equivalent of a grandma simply because I read the news.

Although this memory feels distant during these summer months, I cant help but wonder what this simple statement says about Generation Z (people between the ages of 6 and 24).

Much to my astonishment, only 5% of U.S. citizens aged 9-24 are regular consumers of news from newspapers or digital publications. Meanwhile, 54% of Generation Z members get their daily news from social media sites such as TikTok, Instagram, and the like.

For informed young readers, this means that it has become even harder to get our perspectives and opinions to be taken seriously.

With the spike of social media usage, the average attention span has dropped from 12 seconds in 2000 to eight seconds in 2013. This is a result of social media sites condensing and simplifying information into bite-sized videos that are usually less than three minutes.

How can we be sure that teenagers are grasping whats going on in the news if their only news intake is a short video that can be made by anyone, not even a qualified reporter or journalist?

Moreover, there have been numerous reported false rumors circulating on sites like TikTok in recent months, like those suggesting that certain celebrities are involved in sex-trafficking. This affects not just the reputation of the celebrities but also taints public perception on the credibility of all news shared and discussed on social media platforms.

One of the bigger issues clouding this topic is whether Gen Z is getting a sufficient amount of knowledge about current events if the majority of them are scrolling through posts that can be biased or leave out certain information. This is especially important when it comes to the impact that young voters can have on election outcomes when they show up at the ballot box and the repercussions that follow.

As the journal Foreign Policy put it, Donald Trump always enjoyed massive support from uneducated, low-information white people.

The emphasis here should be on low-information, because without education and a factual understanding of current events, voters can elect unqualified candidates into office.

Gen Z-ers must recognize that voting is a highly important right that many other nations dont have. We must take it seriously.

Older members of Gen Z will have an opportunity to vote in upcoming elections, but with this freedom comes responsibility; they must ensure that they will make an informed choice by consistently reading the news from unbiased, factual sources.

Although social media is a great tool in itself, when it becomes the primary vehicle of informing the general public, many of the stories circulating must be taken with a grain of salt.

Reading the news on social media is not enough. So, please, pick up the paper.

Shreya Prabhu will be a freshman this fall at Greenwich High School,Connecticut. This column was produced for The Progressive magazine.

Continue reading here:
Can democracy survive a generation that doesn't care to be informed? - theday.com