Archive for the ‘Democracy’ Category

Letter: Save capitalism and democracy – The Columbian

You said it, Greg Jayne: Inequity real risk to capitalism (The Columbian, June 13). And its also a real risk to democracy. Justice Brandeis said that best: We may have democracy, or we may have wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we cant have both.

Today, the scales are tipped too far; not only are some people able to accumulate obscene amounts of wealth, this is occurring while the majority of Americans are struggling in fact, some have been slipping backwards. What kind of system, and what kind of philosophy or theology, would support this dysfunctional imbalance?

As Jayne points out, this is the system our youth are confronting as they start their journey on the path of the American dream. The system does not support them, and their political clout to change it pales in contrast with that of the super rich. At least a few of the super rich, like Warren Buffet, realize how privileged they are and recommend raising taxes on the wealthy. If only they all had a conscience like this. Looks like the have nots are going to have to lead the way to save both capitalism and democracy.

Read the original here:
Letter: Save capitalism and democracy - The Columbian

Are Dems Incapable of Defending Democracy? Or Just Unwilling? – The Nation

US Senators Kyrsten Sinema and Joe Manchin arrive for a bipartisan meeting on infrastructure after original talks fell through with the White House on June 8, 2021. (Kevin Dietsch / Getty Images)

Thank you for signing up forThe Nations weekly newsletter.

In his first address to Congress on April 28, Joe Biden invoked the January 6 insurrection, saying, The images of a violent mob assaulting this Capitol, desecrating our democracy, remain vivid in all our minds. He added, The insurrection was an existential crisisa test of whether our democracy could survive. And it did. But the struggle is far from over.

These were uncharacteristically bold words from Biden, but they are not hyperbolic. On January 6, a sitting president incited a mob to attack Congress in order to sabotage the certification of his successor. Shocking as that was, it was only the flash point in a larger war against democracy. In truth, Donald Trumps clown coup had little chance of succeeding. The more serious threat lay in the very fact that he was able to do something so reckless and yet remain the standard-bearer of his party, someone whom most congressional Republicans still wouldnt vote to impeach.

Though Trump has left the White House, the Trumpification of the GOP continues apace. Those few brave but hapless Republicans who stood up to Trump, like Congresswoman Liz Cheney, are finding themselves pariahs in their own party, stripped of their positions and scorned by party loyalists. The GOP has embraced the Trumpian Big Lie that the election was stolen, an idea endorsed by 53 percent of Republicans according to a May Reuters/Ipsos poll. Trump is not so much an ex-president as a pretender to the throne, the exiled king of Mar-a-Lago whom elected Republicans cross at their peril.

The Big Lie is behind the efforts of state-level Republicans to roll back voting rights. As Geoffrey Skelley reported in FiveThirtyEight, In the aftermath of the 2020 election, Republican lawmakers have pushed new voting restrictions in nearly every state. From making it harder to cast ballots early to increasing the frequency of voter roll purges, at least 25 new restrictive voting laws have been enacted, with more potentially on the horizon. The most disturbing innovation in this rollback of democracy is the idea that state legislators could be empowered to overturn election results and pick their own presidential electors. In that scenario, Biden or another Democrat could win the popular count in states that carry over 270 electoral votes and still be deprived of the presidency. MORE FROM Jeet Heer

According to Washington Post columnist Perry Bacon Jr., If Republicans win the governorships of Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin next year, taking total control in those key swing states, they could impose all kinds of electoral barriers for the next presidential election. The Republicans are laying the groundwork to refuse to certify a 2024 Democratic presidential victory should the GOP hold a House majority.

Only the complacent would dismiss this as fanciful. Considering all the antics Trump pulled to try to overturn the 2020 electionand the fact that most elected Republicans are now going out of their way to grovel in front of him2024 will almost certainly be an even bigger test of American democracy.

Democrats have a very narrow window of opportunity to shore up our democracy against the ongoing GOP threat. The good news is that the party has put forward two very strong measuresHR 1 and the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Actwhich are the most robust pro-democracy reforms in a generation. Taken together, they would make it easier to vote, make voting more secure, limit the power of dark money in politics, and push back against antidemocratic shenanigans like gerrymandering.Current Issue

Subscribe today and Save up to $129.

Such measures are all extraordinarily popular with the general public. Writing in The New Yorker in March, Jane Mayer reported receiving a recording of a private conference call on January 8th, between a policy adviser to Senator Mitch McConnell and the leaders of several prominent conservative groupsincluding one run by the Koch brothers networkreveal[ing] the participants worry that the proposed election reforms garner wide support not just from liberals but from conservative voters, too. The speakers on the call expressed alarm at the broad popularity of [HR 1s] provision calling for more public disclosure about secret political donors.

The two voting rights acts proposed by the Democrats are both necessary and popular. Even with their narrow hold on power in Congress, it should be a no-brainer to push them through. Alas, its very hard to pass a prodemocratic measure in an antidemocratic system. Joe Manchin, with his cult of bipartisanship, is one major stumbling block. The West Virginia senator, as Luke Savage notes in The Atlantic, has reiterated his opposition to H.R. 1 on the deeply spurious grounds that any prospective voting-rights legislation ought to pass with bipartisan supporta DOA line of reasoning even when it comes to the watered-down version of the John Lewis Voting Rights Act that Manchin himself is proposing.Related Articles

Arizona Senator Kyrsten Sinema supports HR 1 but, like Manchin, is also a fetishist of the filibuster. Since neither bill can be passed by reconciliation and both lack Republican support, the only way for either to get through the Senate is by overturning the filibuster. The core truth is that Manchin and Sinema are committed to the old order, even if following the established path leads to a successful Republican coup.

Ultimately, this issue is a test of how serious Biden and the Democrats are about their own rhetoric. If American democracy is indeed facing an existential crisis, then Biden should pull out all the stops to win over Manchin and Sinema: offer them any inducements that he has availableand threaten them with severe punishments for not toeing the party line. This is what Republicans are doing to recalcitrant members like Cheney and Mitt Romney. If the GOP can be in deadly earnest trying to undermine democracy, we have every right to expect Democrats to be just as organized, just as dedicated, and just as ruthless in preserving democracy.

Read more:
Are Dems Incapable of Defending Democracy? Or Just Unwilling? - The Nation

Making sure the big people pay their taxes would be a boost to democracy – The Guardian

In June 2016, while researching an article for Vanity Fair, I asked Donald Trump if he was using tax havens to escape tax. I know a lot about tax havens, but I dont use them, he told me. There is greater incentive in many ways to keep your money in the United States.

Fellow billionaires may chuckle, because they know this too, following decades of attacks by special interests on the US tax system. Their goal, as the Texas Republican congressman Bill Archer once said, has been to pull it out by its roots and throw it away so it can never grow back.

Last week, the investigative journalism body ProPublica released shocking new evidence of how easy it is for US billionaires to escape paying tax. Using leaked tax records, it reported that Amazons Jeff Bezos, the publisher Michael Bloomberg, the corporate raider Carl Icahn, Teslas founder, Elon Musk, and the financial investor George Soros all paid zero federal income taxes in some years. From 2014-2018 the richest 25 Americans, many of them monopolists, saw their wealth surge by more than $400bn, while paying taxes worth just 3.4% of that. Meanwhile, average American wage earners in their 40s saw their wealth rise by $65,000 and paid $62,000 in tax.

How do the billionaires get away with it?

Loopholes, is one answer. Trumps tax advisers used copious gaps in real-estate tax laws and stunts such as putting goats on a golf course in New Jersey to qualify for farmland tax reliefs. Another trick is to take a carefully primed asset currently worth almost nothing, push it into a tax-free retirement account just under the contribution limit on the account like putting it through the eye of a needle, in the words of the South Dakota Trust Company owner, Pierce McDowell then flick a financial switch and watch its value explode, tax-free, once safely inside the account.

There are many others. But the really big loophole is this. Lesser mortals pay tax on salaries. Billionaires avoid grubby salaries or even income. Instead, they own assets that rise in value and the rise, those unrealised gains, escape tax. Those richest 25 Americans owned $1.1tn in wealth in 2018 equivalent to the wealth of 14.3 million average Americans yet paid only $1.9bn in personal federal taxes. The 14.3 million little people paid $143bn, or 75 times as much.

In Britain, the situation is similar. Billionaires own assets instead of earning income, and generally dont pay tax when those assets rise in value.

We have many other loopholes. Here, UK billionaires can outdo their American counterparts in some ways. The weirdest is surely the archaic non-dom rule, a legacy of empire, where wealthy residents of the UK who can claim that their domicile is elsewhere only pay tax on their income that arises inside or is brought into the UK. (So they carefully make sure that any income stays offshore.)

The bigger British speciality is, of course, tax havens. We protect and nurture some of the worlds biggest, from the Cayman Islands to the British Virgin Islands to Jersey. Americans use tax havens too, but they loom far larger in British billionaires tax-escape strategies, often in a legal grey zone. (Trumps main tax haven strategy, my investigation found, was to park multiple corporations in Delaware, a US state boasting strong secrecy and other offshore characteristics.)

What can be done? There is no silver bullet, but a few broad strokes, with appropriate exemptions for the little people, would be wildly popular and economically successful.

First, abolish the non-dom rule, as a sign that we are serious.

Next, bolster the corporation tax, most of which is ultimately paid by wealthier folk. Rishi Sunak admitted recently that George Osbornes cuts to the UKs corporation tax rate from 28% to 19% had failed to bring investment. The cuts have also failed to deliver growth, as Tom Bergin explains in his new book, Free Lunch Thinking. Sunak is pushing corporation tax rates up to 25% now; raise this further still. Meanwhile, G7 leaders have just agreed on measures including a global minimum corporation tax rate of at least 15% to tackle tax havens. The G7 deal faces many hurdles, and leaves little for poorer countries, but its a decent start. Complement this by broadening the tried-and-tested financial transactions tax. A new push on this is now underway.

Wealth taxes, used successfully for years around the world, are essential too. If someone owns 1bn in assets (in shares, gold coins, castles or whatever), a simple 1.5% (say) annual wealth tax earns 15m a year. The UK Wealth Tax Commission estimates that a 1% tax could raise more than 50bn a year: the size of last years extra health funding for Covid. Add to the list a land value tax, another kind of wealth tax.

Equalise tax rates. If we taxed income from wealth at the same rate as income from work, we could raise up to 120bn, about double what we get from corporation tax. As we get braver we should also aim to tax all those unrealised gains so if a billionaires wealth rises, they pay tax on that annually, whether or not they sell (or realise) assets. Some powerful Democrats in the US are now pushing for just this.

In the UK, as in the US, the tax authority has been under attack. HMRC staffing levels have fallen from 105,000 in 2005 to around 60,000 today. Estimates of the tax gap of uncollected taxes range from 35bn to a more credible 90bn a year. Tax collectors repay their salaries many times over. Reinvest in HMRC, and especially focus on taxing the wealthy and multinationals.

Finally, of course, get serious about our crime-infested tax haven racket. This would not only shore up our tax system, our economy and our democracy, but it could be our greatest gift to the world right now, as humanity struggles to overcome the pandemic.

Link:
Making sure the big people pay their taxes would be a boost to democracy - The Guardian

Why Democracies in G7 and NATO Should Reject U.S. Leadership – Progressive.org

The world has been treated to successive spectacles of national leaders gathering at a G7 Summit in Cornwall and a NATO Summit in Brussels.

The U.S. corporate media have portrayed these summits as chances for President Joe Biden to rally the worlds democratic nations in a coordinated response to the most serious problems facing all of us, from the COVID-19 pandemic, climate change, and global inequality to ill-defined threats to democracy from Russia and China.

People around the world share our concerns about the United States dystopian political system and imperial outrages.

But theres something seriously wrong with this picture. Democracy means rule by the people. The exceptional power of wealthy Americans and corporations to influence election results and government policies, however, has led to a de facto system of government that fails to reflect the will of the American people on many critical issues.

So when President Biden meets with the leaders of democratic countries, he represents a country that is, in many ways, an undemocratic outlier rather than a leader among democratic nations. This is evident in:

Fortunately, Americans are not the only ones noticing that something is terribly wrong with U.S. democracy. The Alliance of Democracies Foundation (ADF), founded by former Danish Prime Minister and NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, conducted a poll of 50,000 people in fifty-three countries between February and April 2021, and found that people around the world share our concerns about the United States dystopian political system and imperial outrages.

For Americans, the most startling result of the poll might be its finding that more people around the world (44 percent) see the United States as a threat to democracy in their countries than China (38 percent) or Russia (28 percent), which makes nonsense of U.S. efforts to justify its revived Cold War on Russia and China in the name of democracy.

In a larger poll of 124,000 people that ADF conducted in 2020, countries where large majorities saw the United States as a danger to democracy included China, Germany, Austria, Denmark, Ireland, France, Greece, Belgium, Sweden, and Canada.

Biden, after having tea with Queen Elizabeth II at Windsor Castle on June 13 2021, swooped into Brussels on Air Force One for a NATO summit to advance its new Strategic Concept, which is nothing more than a war plan for World War III against both Russia and China.

But we can take solace from evidence that the people of Europe, whom the NATO war plan counts on as front-line troops and mass casualty victims, are not ready to follow President Biden to war.

A January 2021 survey by the European Council on Foreign Affairs found that large majorities of Europeans want to remain neutral in any U.S. war against Russia or China. Only 22 percent would want their country to take the U.S. side in a war on China, and 23 percent in a war on Russia.

Few Americans realize that Biden already came close to war with Russia in March and April, when the United States and NATO supported a new Ukrainian offensive in its civil war against Russian-allied separatists in the Donetsk and Luhansk provinces. Russia moved tens of thousands of heavily armed troops to its borders with Ukraine, to make it clear that it was ready to defend its Ukrainian allies and was quite capable of doing so.

On April 13, Biden blinked, turned around two U.S. destroyers that were steaming into the Black Sea, and called Putin to request the summit that is now taking place.

The antipathy of ordinary people everywhere toward the U.S. determination to provoke military confrontation with Russia and China begs serious questions about the complicity of their leaders in these incredibly dangerous, possibly suicidal, U.S. policies. When ordinary people all over the world can see the dangers and pitfalls of following the United States as a model and a leader, why do their neoliberal leaders keep showing up to lend credibility to the posturing of U.S. leaders at summits like the G7 and NATO?

Maybe it is precisely because the United States has succeeded in what the corporate ruling classes of other nations also aspire tonamely greater concentrations of wealth and power and less public interference in their freedom to accumulate and control them.

Maybe the leaders of other wealthy countries and military powers are genuinely awed by the dystopian American Dream as the example par excellence of how to sell inequality, injustice, and war to the public in the name of freedom and democracy.

In that case, the fact that people in other wealthy countries are not so easily led to war or lured into political passivity and impotence would only increase the awe of their leaders for their U.S. counterparts, who literally laugh all the way to the bank as they pay lip service to the sanctity of the American Dream.

Ordinary people in other countries are right to be wary of the Pied Piper of U.S. leadership, but their rulers should be, too. The fracturing and disintegration of U.S. society should stand as a warning to neoliberal governments and ruling classes everywhere to be more careful what they wish for.

Instead of a world where other countries emulate or fall victim to the United States failed experiment in extreme neoliberalism, the key to a peaceful, sustainable, and prosperous future for all the worlds peopleincluding Americanslies in working together, learning from each other and adopting policies that serve the public good and improve the lives of all, especially those most in need. Theres a name for that. Its called democracy.

More here:
Why Democracies in G7 and NATO Should Reject U.S. Leadership - Progressive.org

How close is America to the end of democracy? – News 1130

How close is America to the end of democracy? - NEWS 1130 Rogers Media uses cookies for personalization, to customize its online advertisements, and for other purposes. Learn more or change your cookie preferences. Rogers Media supports the Digital Advertising Alliance principles. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies.We use cookies (why?) You can change cookie preferences. Continued site use signifies consent.

by the big story

Posted Jun 16, 2021 5:22 am PDT

In todays Big Story podcast, many Americans (and Canadians, and citizens around the world) hoped that once Donald Trump was out of office, and Joe Biden became president, the country would experience a snap-back towards political normalcy. That hasnt happened. And driven by their fears of being ousted by Trumps base, Republicans around the country are continuing to push the United States towards the brink.

How did this happen? When did Trumpism become the entire identity of the Republican party? Can America wake up to the threat posed to its most crucial institutions, or is it already too late?

GUEST: Peter Wehner, contributing writer at The Atlantic, senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. Peter has worked in the three Republican presidential administrations previous to Trumps.

You can subscribe to The Big Story podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google and Spotify

You can also find it at thebigstorypodcast.ca.

We've sent an email with instructions to create a new password. Your existing password has not been changed.

{* backButton *}{* forgotPassword_sendButton *}

Subscribe to NEWS 1130 newsletters

I understand that I can withdraw my consent at any time

Loading newsletters

{* mergeAccounts *}

{* public_profileBlurb *}

{* public_displayName *}

Updating your profile data...

You have activated your account, please feel free to browse our exclusive contests, videos and content.

You have activated your account, please feel free to browse our exclusive contests, videos and content.

An error has occurred while trying to update your details. Please contact us.

Or

{* traditionalSignIn_signInButton *}

Or

{* backButton *}{* traditionalSignIn_signInButton *}

Please confirm the information below before signing up.

Subscribe to NEWS 1130 newsletters

I understand that I can withdraw my consent at any time

By checking this box, I agree to the terms of service and privacy policy of Rogers Media.

{* backButton *}{* createAccountButton *}

We didn't recognize that password reset code. Enter your email address to get a new one.

Sorry we could not verify that email address. Enter your email below and we'll send you another email.

Or

{* loginWidget *}

Read more here:
How close is America to the end of democracy? - News 1130