Archive for the ‘Democracy’ Category

Government in the United Kingdom |UK Democracy

The United Kingdom is a parliamentary democracy based on universal adult suffrage. It is also a constitutional monarchy. Ministers govern in the name of the sovereign, who is the head of state and government, commander-in-chief of all the armed forces of the Crown and the supreme governor of the established Church of England. The constitution is unwritten, and relies on a combination of statutes, common law and convention.

The UK is a union of four countries: England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The Crown dependencies (the Channel Islands and the Isle of Man) are largely self-governing with the UK responsible for their defence and international relations.

Parliament is bicameral, with an upper chamber, the House of Lords (89 hereditary peers, 678 life peers and 25 bishops in March 2011), and a lower chamber, the House of Commons (650 elected members). Elections to the lower chamber are held every five years.

The prime minister and cabinet lead the executive. The prime minister is appointed by the sovereign, and is usually the leader of the party who commands a majority in the House of Commons. The prime minister chooses and appoints the cabinet.

The UK Parliament enacts primary legislation, except where these matters have been devolved to the Scottish Parliament and Northern Ireland Assembly. The executive consists of the members of the cabinet, other ministers, government departments, local authorities, public corporations, regulatory bodies and other organisations subject to ministerial control.

Devolution changed the responsibilities of the Secretaries of State for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, although they still retain UK Cabinet seats.

The judiciary determines common law and interprets statutes. The United Kingdom Supreme Court is the final court of appeal in civil matters for the whole of the UK, and in criminal matters everywhere except Scotland. In England and Wales, the High Court of Justice has three divisions, Chancery, Queens Bench and Family, which deal with certain more complex civil cases, while the county courts try the majority of civil cases. The Crown Court has jurisdiction in the most serious criminal cases providing trial by jury.

England has had a single crown since the 10th century and a parliament since the 13th century. The constitution evolved as a struggle for power between them. In 1169 Henry II of England authorised an invasion of Ireland, following which a large part of the country came under the control of Anglo-Norman magnates. Wales came under English rule in the 13th-century during the reign of Edward I. In 1603 King James VI of Scotland succeeded to the English throne, thus uniting the two crowns; in 1707 both countries agreed on a single parliament for Great Britain.

The modern Conservative party evolved out of the 18th century Tory Party and the Liberal Democrats out of the Whig party. The Labour party, representing working people, emerged at the end of the 19th century.

The deep divisions in Northern Irish society, dating from the time of the Irish independence struggle at the beginning of the 20th century, were exposed in an upsurge of violent conflict in the 1970s, which lasted into the 1990s. Many members of the Protestant majority were Unionists who wanted to remain British, while many Roman Catholics were Nationalists or Republicans who favoured unity with the Irish republic.

In 1997 the Labour party won their first general election since 1974, and Tony Blair became prime minister. In 2007 he was succeeded as Labour party leader and prime minister by Gordon Brown. In the May 2010 election no party won an overall majority. The party with the largest number of seats, David Camerons Conservative party, formed a coalition government with Nick Cleggs Liberal Democrat party; Cameron became prime minister and Clegg became deputy prime minister. It was the countrys first full coalition government for 65 years.

Read more:
Government in the United Kingdom |UK Democracy

The Coronavirus Crisis in the U.S. Is a Failure of Democracy – TIME

Its become commonplace to refer to COVID-19 as the worst public health crisis of our lifetimes. But what has cost the United States so many lives and jobs during the pandemic is not, at root, a failure of public health. Its a failure of democracy.

Despite our political polarization, and in the face of an unprecedented threat, the American people have been in remarkable agreement about what they expect from their government. From the time the virus was discovered, our scientists and public health officials urged aggressive action and put forward plans to save lives. Poll after poll has shown that a clear majority of Americans trust want our leaders to heed the experts advice. Yet that hasnt happened. We were far too slow to implement social-distancing guidelines a delay epidemiologists found is responsible for 90% of U.S. coronavirus deaths and now were acting far too quickly to reopen the economy.

In other words, with lives on the line, our elected leaders are ignoring the peoples will, and Americans are dying as a result. In our shining city on a hill the global model for representative government how could this possibly happen?

The answer, while dispiriting, is simple: Our representative government isnt nearly as representative as it used to be. Over the last four decades, our republic has been completely transformed, with nearly every change making our leaders far less responsive to the public interest. More than any political or cultural trend, more even than President Trump, our redesigned system of government is responsible for the crisis we find ourselves in today.

When I worked in the Obama White House, I often heard the phrase, Good policy is good politics. The implication was clear: in a democracy, there exists a clear link between politicians choices and electoral outcomes, between power and accountability. In recent decades, however, that link has been almost entirely severed. The number of Americans legally barred from voting has risen dramatically, and many Americans who retain their right to vote are finding it harder to exercise that right than ever before. Between 2008 and 2016, the number of polling places in America was cut by more than 10%. Voter purges have kicked millions of eligible Americans off the voting rolls, a number that is only growing. Restrictive laws passed within the last decade have made it harder to register, harder to vote and harder to ensure that a vote will count. Thanks to Citizens United, and other recent Supreme Court decisions like it, a handful of donors have more power than ever. But most American citizens have much less.

Its no surprise that the people most likely to suffer because of our governments flailing response to the coronavirus lower-income and nonwhite Americans are the most likely to be disenfranchised. In our redesigned democracy, voting restrictions can turn bad policy into good politics more efficiently than at any time since the end of Jim Crow.

Americans political power has been further diminished by our political map. Between 1997 and 2016, Much of this shift is organic, occurring because Democrats increasingly are found packed together in cities, but gerrymandering plays a newly expanded role as well. Devious district-drawing has always been part of American politics. (Patrick Henry tried to gerrymander James Madison out of the very first Congress in 1789.) But as a group of researchers from the University of Chicagos Law Review found, the scale and skew of todays gerrymandering are unprecedented in modern history. As we battle the coronavirus, American lives depend on a successful government response. But with rare exceptions, House Members jobs do not.

In the upper chamber, the problems created by our political map are the result not of design but of neglect. Thanks to a deal made under duress at the Constitutional Convention 233 years ago, every state gets the same two Senators, regardless of its population size. But the impact of the so-called Great Compromise is very different today than it was back then. With Democrats increasingly found in dense cities, and Republicans in exurbs and rural areas, the Senates structure now gives one party an enormous edge, because a majority of states are Republican-leaning even when a majority of voters are not.

The Senates map has had particularly disastrous consequences over the last three months, because COVID-19 hit Americas urban population centers first and hardest. In early March, for example, as the virus was spreading, the first 15 U.S. states to report cases of the coronavirus accounted for 56% of Americas population but only 30% of the Americas senators. No wonder the Senate was initially slow to act.

Of course, our states boundaries are hardly new. But by refusing to admit Washington, D.C., as a state, even as its population has grown to 120% the size of Wyomings, Senators have gone out of their way to maintain the imbalance of power between urban and rural interests in their chamber.

A similar failure to mend the cracks in our democracys foundation is responsible for the White Houses disastrous handling of the crisis. About 50 and 40 years ago, respectively, Republican Richard Nixon and Democrat Jimmy Carter attempted to abolish the Electoral College, correctly understanding that it was both obsolete and incompatible with our modern conception of democracy. Had they succeeded, Donald Trump would today be a former reality TV star with an unhealthy addiction to social media. Instead, despite being rejected by voters, President Trump is in charge of our pandemic response.

Finally, the expansion of corporate power in our democracy has pushed our government into acting more slowly and reopening more quickly than the American people believe is safe. Within the past two decades alone, the amount of money spent on Washington lobbying has doubled, to the point where the annual budget for influencing Congress now far exceeds the annual budget for the House and Senate itself. When major decisions are being made, the American people still have a seat at the table. But business has far more seats than it did when I was growing up in the 1980s and 1990s.

Given corporations vastly increased clout with policymakers, its hardly shocking that business groups were able to convince the Trump Administration to delay and scale back the use of the Defense Production Act to compel the manufacture of crucial medical supplies, or that Senate Republicans make-or-break priority for the next relief package is waiving liability for employers who put their workers at risk.

That our government has failed to promote the public welfare during this crisis is a tragedy. But its no surprise. From the way we manage elections to the way we fund campaigns, from the congressional districts we draw to the lobbyists we include in the policymaking process, the story is the same. The American republic is a government of fewer people, by fewer people, for fewer people than at any time in the past half-century. And We, the People, are suffering because of it.

Yet even now, nothing about our democracys decline is inevitable. There are plenty of ways we can restore a representative government that dont involve passing a constitutional amendment or hoping Mitch McConnells heart grows three sizes one day. Making voter registration automatic; re-enfranchising millions of Americans; a sliding-scale tax on corporate lobbying; creating public financing for campaigns; admitting Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico as states all these things and more could be done by a single act of Congress.

Fixing our democracy should be a top priority for all Americans, not just when it comes to the pandemic, but when it comes to tackling nearly every great challenge facing America today. From gun safety to climate change to immigration to income inequality, its the same story: Americans want one thing, our government does another, and the American people are worse off as a result.

Tragically, its too late to prevent the worst of the coronavirus crisis. But by restoring our representative government, we can prevent the next great crisis, and save untold numbers of American lives.

Thank you! For your security, we've sent a confirmation email to the address you entered. Click the link to confirm your subscription and begin receiving our newsletters. If you don't get the confirmation within 10 minutes, please check your spam folder.

Contact us at editors@time.com.

Original post:
The Coronavirus Crisis in the U.S. Is a Failure of Democracy - TIME

Spencer Critchely, Never-Trumpers Look to Save Democracy – Good Times Weekly

Share

Share

Share

Email

Spencer Critchley, managing partner for Boots Road Group, is hosting a discussionthe fourth in an ongoing seriesthat seeks to improve communication across political divides, but the true goal of the discussion is more profound, as evidenced by its title, Saving Democracy.

Its finding the people wherever they sit on the ideological spectrum who believe in civil debate, says Critchley. The members of this partythe party of democracyhave to find each other.

The next Saving Democracy installment is Tuesday, May 26 from 6:30-8pm, streaming on Facebook Live.

Past Saving Democracy events have spanned ideologies, with voices from both the right and the left. Critchley says Tuesdays event will focus on the conservative perspectives and on political moderates. It will be titled What Would Lincoln Do. Guests will include former California Republican leader Kristin Olsen and Dan Schnur, who once served as media chief for Senator John McCains 2000 presidential campaign and who now teaches at both USC and UC Berkeley. Another guest will be Mike Madrid, co-founder of the Lincoln Project, a conservative group aiming to defeat President Trump and Trumpism at the ballot box, according to the organizations website. None of the guests are fans of President Donald J. Trump.

Critchley will moderate the talk.

He says the thing that makes Trump so dangerous is his corruption. That includes the presidents self-dealing, his firing of anyone who gets in his way, his efforts to solicit help from foreign governments, and his persistent lies, which are intoxicating in and of themselves, Critchley elaborates.

The point is not to get away with the lie. The point is to do away with the concept of truth, Critchley says.

He says Americans should not give in to their differences, or else those who are driving divisions will get their way by making groups of people hate each other more. Critchley says many of those who pursue a divisive brand of civil discourse are Trump supporters, but not all of them.

Theres a brand of liberal intolerance. Its a different brand. It takes a different shapeif you disagree with me, then youre corrupt, he explains.

Critchley, author of the new book Patriots of Two Nations: Why Trump Was Inevitable and What Happens Next, traces the central schism in American political discourse back to the founding days of United States. There was a group that supported the ideals of the enlightenment and another, which he calls the counter-enlightenment, that did not.

In order to win elections in the 21st century, Critchley says, Democrats will need to learn to better communicate with those they disagree with.

The problem is not Trump, he says. The problem is that someone like Trump could become president.

Saving Democracy: What Would Lincoln Do will air on Facebook Live on Tuesday, May 26, from 6:30-8pm. Attendants may register in advance, to get a reminder when the event goes live. Visit bootsroad.com/democracy for more information.

UPDATE May 22 7:50pm: A previous version of this headline misspelled Spencer Critchleys last name.

Jacob, the news editor for Good Times, is an award-winning journalist, whose news interests include housing, water, transportation, and county politics. A onetime connoisseur of dive bars and taquerias, he has evolved into an aspiring health food nut. Favorite yoga pose: shavasana.

See original here:
Spencer Critchely, Never-Trumpers Look to Save Democracy - Good Times Weekly

Amending the Constitution Is the Only Way to Restore Our Democracy – Niskanen Center

It is time to talk about the elephant in the room. The harsh reality is that the Constitution no longer functions. Our government is as broken and dysfunctional now as it must have been under the Articles of Confederation. In a rational world, serious people would be talking about the obvious solution: a series of constitutional amendments to overhaul and modernize our political system.

We live in a country where the president lost the popular vote by a full 2 percent, and yet won the election. We live in a country in which one partys candidates for the Senate received over 17 million fewer votes than the others in the most recent election, yet increased their majority by a mere two seats. A majority of Americans did not support the election of this president or the majority party in the Senate, and they do not support the policies advanced by that president and party.

We live in a country in which the president can profit from his public office, spend money not appropriated by Congress, block every investigation of himself, use the Justice Department to protect those who serve him, and get away with it all by stalling in court and using his partys Senate majority to prevent impeachment.

And we live in a country where the national legislature cannot pass a budget or address any major problems due to crippling partisan gridlock.

Democracy is a simple concept. Candidates and parties present their ideas and qualifications to the voters. The winners then can govern and enact their policies, consistent with the rule of law. But our system of disproportionate representation in the Senate, the indirect election of the chief executive, and gridlock-producing layers of checks and balances now prevent the United States from being a functional democracy.

Theres a well-known but specious argument that the founders created this nation as a republic, not a democracy. Its true that our Constitution requires a republican form of government. But anyone who took Political Science 101 in college should know the definitions of these terms. A republic is a state without a monarchy. A democracy is a state in which the people elect the government. The U.S. is both a republic and a democracy. Great Britain is a democracy but not a republic. China is a republic but not a democracy.

Our democracy is broken. There are more Democrats than Republicans in America, yet the minority party controls the presidency and Senate. And in the present state of polarization and hyper-partisanship, our elections do not produce governments that can govern unless one party can elect the president, a solid majority in the House, and over 60 seats in the Senate (enough to overcome a filibuster). Gridlock encourages the president to assume more and more authority to govern by executive orders. A rogue president cannot be constrained in a timely fashion by either the courts or the Congress, so long as his party controls one-third of the seats in the Senate.

The solutions are obvious. The electoral college must be abolished, or at least substantially altered to make it proportional to the population. The same is true of the U.S. Senate. The Senate should reflect the will of the American people. In what rational world does Alaska have as much power in the upper house of the legislative branch as does California?

Those two reforms are central, but more should be done. The ability of the minority to block legislation in the Senate should be abolished. The ability of Congress to investigate the president should be strengthened. And the question of whether the president can be prosecuted while in office must be clarified.

The only way to restore democracy to our republic is by amending the Constitution. In practice, getting that done looks nearly impossible in our current political atmosphere. But that does not mean we shouldnt try. It has often taken decades of persistent activism before changes to the Constitution can be pushed through. The Equal Rights Amendment was first introduced to Congress in 1923 and the battle is still going on. We need to begin a campaign to create a government that allows a majority of Americans to elect a government that can actually govern on their behalf.

The current situation cannot go on forever. Support for democracy is eroding. If we continue to elect national governments that support policies opposed by the majority, which cant pass budgets or solve problems, the people will turn to other alternatives. This is how authoritarians take control.

The Constitution was never meant to be static. The founders knew that constitutional amendments, maybe even a second constitutional convention, would be needed at critical moments in history. Now is one of those times.

Continued here:
Amending the Constitution Is the Only Way to Restore Our Democracy - Niskanen Center

‘Best of the Rest:’ Democracy Madness reaches the draw’s final quarter – The Fulcrum

Over the past six week, readers of The Fulcrum have selected their top voting rights, election administration and money in politics reforms. Now it's time to kick off the final "region" in our Democracy Madness tournament.

We're calling it the "Best of the Rest," and we're inviting you to vote on a final group of 16 ideas for fixing the problems with our democracy's fairness and functionality. They range from proposals for enhancing election security to bolstering government ethics rules, and from the promotion of civic education to statehood for Washington, D.C.

Checking in as the top seed is a national mandate for paper ballots in all elections. While this remains the biggest concern among those focused on securing elections against hackers, it has ceded the spotlight to vote-at-home efforts because of the coronavirus.

The second seed, creating a steady stream of federal election funding, covers both of those issues. Congress has appropriated $800 million to secure the 2020 elections and $400 million for making it safer and easier to cast a ballot during the pandemic. But these are both one-time payments, not the annualized outlays that states say they need in order to conduct elections properly.

To get to the regional finals, each of these will need to get through a number of other proposals -- each with its own merits.

First-round voting continues through Wednesday, with succeeding rounds taking place over the following week and a half. Two weeks from today, we'll kick off the Final Four. The winner of this region will then face the earlier winners: ranked-choice voting, the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact and repealing Citizens United.

Click the Vote Now button to make your eight selections. (You can click the matchups, then each label, for more about the proposals.)

From Your Site Articles

Related Articles Around the Web

Continued here:
'Best of the Rest:' Democracy Madness reaches the draw's final quarter - The Fulcrum