Archive for the ‘Democracy’ Category

The Washington Post’s new slogan turns out to be an old saying – Washington Post

It may be the most widely debated and commented upon newspaper slogan since ... well, has there ever been a widely debated newspaper slogan?

The Washington Post added a new phrase beneath its online masthead this week Democracy Dies in Darkness and the commentary flowed immediately. The slogan quickly trended on Twitter, drawing tweets even from the Peoples Daily newspaper in China. It was fodder for a few late-night cracks from Stephen Colbert, who suggested some of the rejected phrases included No, You Shut Up, Come at Me, Bro and We Took Down Nixon Who Wants Next?

Others called it ominous, awesome, and heavy-handed. Slate offered an alternative list: 15 Metal Albums Whose Titles Are Less Dark Than The Washington Posts New Motto.

The addition of the dramatic and alliterative phrase was generally misinterpreted as an indirect reply to President Trumps phrasemaking about the news media (dishonest, the enemy of the American people, etc.). But thats not the case.

The Post decided to come up with a slogan nearly a year ago, long before Trump was the Republican presidential nominee, senior executives said. The paper hasnt had an official slogan in its 140-year existence, although it did get some mileage with a long-running advertising tagline, If you dont get it, you dont get it.

The papers owner, Amazon.com founder Jeffrey P. Bezos, used the phrase in an interview with The Posts executive editor, Martin Baron, at a tech forum at The Post last May. I think a lot of us believe this, that democracy dies in darkness, that certain institutions have a very important role in making sure that there is light, he said at the time, speaking of his reasons for buying the paper.

Bezos apparently heard the phrase from legendary investigative reporter Bob Woodward, a Post associate editor. Woodward said he referenced it during a presentation at a conference that Bezos attended in 2015 in which Woodward talked about The Last of the Presidents Men, his most recent book about the Watergate scandal.

But Woodward, who has used the phrase in reference to President Nixon for years, said he didnt coin it; he read it some years earlier in a judicial opinion in a First Amendment case. He couldnt recall the specifics of the case or the name of the judge who wrote the opinion.

It goes way back, he said. Its definitely not directed at Trump. Its about the dangers of secrecy in government, which is what I worry about most. The judge who said it got it right.

Woodwards source appears to be Judge Damon J. Keith, of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit, who ruled in a pre-Watergate era case that the government couldnt wiretap individuals without a warrant. In his decision, Keith apparently coined a variation on The Posts motto, writing that Democracy dies in the dark.

In any case, the phrase was at the center of discussions when a small group of Post employees, including Baron and Publisher Fred Ryan, began meeting last year to develop a slogan. One planning document for the group suggested finding a positive variation on the early contender Democracy Dies in Darkness.

The goal of the papers slogan, the document said, would be to communicate that The Post has a long-standing reputation for providing news and information with unparalleled analysis and insight. ... Our position must be conveyed disruptively so we can shake consumers out of their news-as-commodity mindset.

It added that any slogan must be memorable and may be slightly uncomfortable for us at first. It also had to be lofty, positive [and] not bossy and pithy enough to fit on a T-shirt.

The group brainstormed more than 500 would-be slogans. The choices ranged from the heroic (Dauntless Defenders of the Truth) to the clunky (American democracy lives down the street. No one keeps closer watch.) to the Zen-like (Yes. Know.).

The group ultimately ended up where it started with Democracy Dies in Darkness.

Which means that the slogan, which will be added to print copies of the paper next week, could be among the most famous four words that Woodward has ever contributed to The Post. In time, the phrase might even rival All the Presidents Men, the memorable title of the bestseller Woodward wrote with Carl Bernstein about Nixons fall.

Well, Woodward said, its better than Follow the money, the famous movie line that Woodwards character got from his anonymous Watergate source, Deep Throat.

Read the rest here:
The Washington Post's new slogan turns out to be an old saying - Washington Post

Editorial: Dave Brat gets an earful of democracy – Richmond.com

Whatever you think about 7th District Rep. Dave Brat and he certainly inspires strong opinions, both pro and con he deserves credit for the town hall he held on Tuesday night in Blackstone.

Granted, he should have chosen a location closer to the heart of the district, rather than one that seemed designed to evade or inconvenience his critics. But if that was the aim, it failed. The audience raked Brat over the coals, interrupted him, booed him and heckled him. He kept his composure.

Many Republican congressmen have been facing similar crowds at other boisterous town halls across the country. Good for them. The events give regular citizens a chance to sound off and be heard by the people who represent them and rule over them. Both sides of the exchanges probably learn something.

The air has been full lately with grim warnings about imminent dangers, both foreign and domestic, to the American political system. The recent town halls offer an encouraging reminder that reports of democracys demise have been greatly exaggerated.

Continue reading here:
Editorial: Dave Brat gets an earful of democracy - Richmond.com

Can Zuckerberg Save Journalism Or Democracy? – Huffington Post

Driving through Alabama on Presidents Day, Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg swung by the newsroom of The Selma Times-Journal. In a post to his 86 million followers Monday night, he thanked journalists for their efforts to surface the truth and keep their communities informed.

Zuckerbergs post comes on the heels of his nearly 6,000-word manifesto that offered an ambitious vision for Facebooks global role. Its an important declaration of principles that can help restore trust in news and information delivered on digital platforms. The statement implies a responsibility to share benefits with producers of content, acknowledges the importance of accurate information and seeks to engage communities in civil discourse. This welcome change of direction couldnt come at a more critical time.

As Zuckerberg knows, democracy requires an informed electorate, able to separate fact from fiction. But thats never been more difficult.

TV, the web and social media have combined to give citizens information to support any position and confirm any bias, facts be damned. But information is not journalism, and data begs to be organized and interpreted. The common foundation of everyday facts, the starting place from which we discuss differences, is eroding. By chasing clicks and taking the presidential bait, journalists have and will continue to lose ground. And so will democracy.

We need to deal with both short-term attacks on journalism and the longer-term consequences for our democracy.

The short-term answer is plain to see, but hard to achieve: Do the job.

Journalism 101 requires the full, accurate, contextual search for truth, regardless of how its packaged or on what platform its presented. That hasnt changed.

But much else has. Recent attacks on journalism couldnt have caught it in a weaker state. The transition to digital has decimated many newsrooms and given rise to new kinds of information companies with, until now, a different set of values.

Google, Facebook and others have supplanted the power of newsrooms by repackaging their journalismalong the way mixing it with other web content branded as news but not subject to the same ethical standards and traditionsand giving voice and access to hundreds of millions of users.

Technological disruption of the news industry is not a new phenomenon, of course. In the middle of the last century, Jack Knight built a successful newspaper empire against a backdrop of familiar forces: technological change, a shifting social order at home and unrest abroad. He knew that troubled times demanded a publishers steady, principled hand.

While a majority of Americans are spending more time consuming news on social media platforms, the leaders of these companies have, until recently, declined to accept their role as the most important publishers of our time. They have shown scant interest in judging wheat from chaff while chasing market share.

The good news is thats changing, and Zuckerberg is leading the way. He and others in Silicon Valley would be well served by turning to Jack Knights core values for guidance. In our digital age, it may seem counterintuitive to look to a man who had ink in his veins for advice. But the basic principles about the role of information and the media in our democracy that Knight embraced remain critically important.

First: Get the business model right. Knight believed in profitability and its achievement through a quality product and innovation. Facebooks statement last week suggests a way forward for platforms and publishers. Profit and purpose should be mutually reinforcing, not antithetical.

Second:The product has to be demonstrably true to be believed. Knight wrote, simply, get the truth and print it. There is objective truth, and it matters, even if it wont sit well with everyone. But a popular information platform that lacks standards will lack credibility and if you lack credibility, youll lose business. Facebook, as I read Zuckerbergs manifesto, understands this.

Third: Use technology to engage the reader. Knight was an early adopter. It was the telephone, after all, that allowed him to reach beyond his hometown of Akron and become an editor of multiple newspapers at once. He later embraced the fax and early internet, always searching for new ways to engage readers and get the news out.

The reluctant publishers of Silicon Valley know that technological innovation can drive progress. Its not enough to use technology to amass clicks and shares; use it also to get accurate information to people as conveniently and seamlessly as possible. Technology has shrunk our world in remarkable ways, but if speed and connectivity displace substance and meaning, we lose civic value.

To preserve civic value, and restore faith in the free press, todays new publishers should heed yesterdays values. It would be good for businessand for democracy.

Alberto Ibargen is president and CEO of the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation.

Read this article:
Can Zuckerberg Save Journalism Or Democracy? - Huffington Post

Democracy Voucher Program – DemocracyVoucher | seattle.gov

What is the Democracy Voucher Program? To learn about what the Democracy Voucher Program is, please visit the About the Program page.

Can I still apply to receive Democracy Vouchers? Yes. Apply now to receive your $100 in Democracy Vouchers

Frequently Asked Questions View the list of frequently asked questions here. If these do not answer your questions, please feel free to contact us at democracyvoucher@seattle.gov or call (206) 727-8855.

Are you a registered voter? You do not need to apply and will automatically receive your Democracy Vouchers by mail after January 3, 2017.

Not sure if you are a registered voter? Visit the King County Elections' website to check if you are a registered voter and/or update your address.

Information for Seattle Residents Visit the Seattle residents' page for more information about how Seattle residents may participate in the Democracy Voucher Program.

Information for Candidates Visit the Candidates' page for information about how to qualify as a candidate in the Democracy Voucher Program. Interested candidates are strongly encouraged to contact Polly Grow, the Campaign Finance Auditor and Trainer before starting a campaign.

See the original post:
Democracy Voucher Program - DemocracyVoucher | seattle.gov

Democracy in America: How Is It Doing? – New York Times


New York Times
Democracy in America: How Is It Doing?
New York Times
Democracy in the United States is strong, but showing some cracks. That is the conclusion of a new survey of 1,571 political scientists. Almost all said that the United States performed well on some of the most important measures of democracy: free and ...

More here:
Democracy in America: How Is It Doing? - New York Times