Archive for the ‘Democracy’ Category

Divided we stand in defence of democracy – Spiked

The political alternative to public divisions is to fix elections or perhaps censor one side, to create an illusion of unity, like those polls where the dictator scores 98 per cent. That would be as anti-democratic as the mock democracy of continually calling for another referendum when you dont like the result of the last one.

Historically speaking, bigger and wider divisions in modern political life have emerged as a product of mass democracy. It was as representative democracy spread that political parties formed to represent different competing interests in a necessarily divided body politic.

For example, Americas Founding Fathers originally envisaged a US republic without political parties or factions, united in one common national interest. George Washington thought party politics agitates the community with ill-founded jealousies and false alarms, kindles the animosity of one part against another. Thomas Jefferson declared that if I could not go to heaven but with a party, I would not go there at all. This outlook reflected their strictly limited original vision of how democratic America should be, with voting rights restricted to a minority of property-owning males who could agree where their mutual interests lay.

However, as the republics political life began and voting rights spread, political divisions and factions quickly took shape. By 1793 Jefferson the anti-party man had resigned from Washingtons cabinet to lead the opposition and form the Democratic-Republican Party, via which he won the highly divisive presidential election of 1800 in a battle against the authoritarian Alien and Sedition Acts. America the anti-party republic thus became the first to have national political parties competing for power at the ballot box. As US democracy expanded and deepened, in other words, so did political division.

Of course, our supposedly anti-division politicians understand that a political divide is inevitable. What they really seem to object to is raising the wrong kind of division. Such as, the gaping divide between the political and cultural elites on one hand and the deplorables, the revolting proles, on the other, as highlighted by reactions to the Brexit referendum and the election of Donald Trump.

Today, societys divisions are most often presented in terms of identity or demographics rather than ideas and outlooks. So the EU referendum result has been endlessly analysed as a product of a generational divide or an educational divide in UK society, rather than a moral/political divide over values. And divisions over everything from free speech to immigration tend to be seen in terms of intersectionality, disputes between minorities and identity groups.

Such divisions then become seen as fixed and immovable, often leading to exchanges of identity-based abuse and competitive offence-taking rather than engaged, opinionated debate. The solution is not to try to wish divisions away in empty calls for unity, but to draw different dividing lines in the debate.

What we need for a proper democratic divide is a political choice the thing that ultimately makes democracy worth voting for. Democracy has to mean more than a pencil cross in an empty box. It must involve making a choice about the sort of society we want to see, and taking responsibility for that decision. Such meaningful choices are sadly lacking in a culture where leading Western political parties have become mere election machines rather than popular movements, offering different brands of managerialism rather than distinct ideologies or outlooks.

But dont despair. The current heated issues provide the opportunity to start drawing new dividing lines and not along the traditional left-right divide. The first line we need to stand on is the division between the supporters and the new enemies of democracy, the most pressing issue of our times.

Divided we must stand in defence of democracy. Down with the internecine identity wars, bring on the divisive politics of choice.

Mick Hume is spikeds editor-at-large. His new book, Revolting! How the Establishment is Undermining Democracy and what theyre afraid of, is published by William Collins. Buy it here.

For permission to republish spiked articles, please contact Viv Regan.

View original post here:
Divided we stand in defence of democracy - Spiked

When democracy is attacked, one of the first things done is to suppress newspapers – Southgate News Herald

Were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter.

These wise words were spoken by Thomas Jefferson. He knew that preserving democracy required a strong and free press. Something the current occupant of the White House should realize. Although the press and the president have a natural adversarial role, Donald Trump has taken press bashing to dangerous levels.

In vitriolic attacks not seen since the days of Richard Nixon, Trump has routinely vilified the press.

Constantly denigrated as false and crooked, the news agencies have only done their jobs; maybe too well. At an off-camera press briefing at the White House, the New York Times, the Los Angeles Times, CNN and others were forcibly blocked and forbidden to be there and only a select group was admitted. Trump claimed CNN and others kept reporting stories critical of him; the so-called fake news. He should know being in the White House means being criticized.

Another president, Harry Truman, once said, If you cant stand the heat, get out of the kitchen.

Speaking of Nixon, he despised the press, also. But were it not for the Washington Post, Watergate might have remained the third rate burglary he claimed it was. Were it not for the New York Times, we might never have known about the Pentagon Papers and our involvement in Vietnam.

Are we seeing a Nixon 2.0 with Trump? There are his bitter attacks on the media. Theres Kellyanne Conways bizarre assertion that there are alternative facts that reminds one of Nixons Press Secretary Ron Ziegler and his infamous comment of: This statement is operative. The others are inoperative.

Trump has already done the Saturday Night Massacre in which he fired the Acting Attorney General Susan Yates for not supporting his executive order on a Muslim ban which courts later blocked.

Were Jefferson alive today, he would be appalled at the animosity for the 4th Estate. He would lecture Trump on the importance of one of the bedrocks of our democracy. He would give him a sharp rebuke for saying the press was the enemy of the people.

Jefferson also said: Our first object should therefore be, to leave open to him all the avenues to truth. The most effectual hitherto found, is the freedom of the press. It is, therefore, the first shut up by those who fear the investigation of their actions.

History shows when democracy is attacked, one of the first things done is to suppress newspapers.

This is why the press needs to be a powerful check against the government, especially now.

When Trump claims he cant be challenged or his rulings cant be questioned, this arrogance must be reined in.

A Trump spokesperson, Stephen Miller, made an incredulous statement. Miller claimed Trump had absolute power when it came to issues like immigration. Show me anywhere in the Constitution where anyone has absolute power over anything. When claims are made that power cannot be questioned or challenged, it is time to do both loudly and repeatedly.

Jefferson observed: The only security of all is in a free press. The force of public opinion cannot be resisted when permitted freely to be expressed ....

That force was certainly seen nationally with the Womens March on Washington. It also was seen locally with many town hall meetings being packed with people expressing their opinions. Those who would deny or denounce these events do so at their own peril.

Detroit Judge Damon Keith of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit once said, democracies die behind closed doors. A free press will always make sure those doors are open to all.

Southgate resident Allan Bieniek has appeared in several publications, including The New York Times and the Harvard International Review.

Original post:
When democracy is attacked, one of the first things done is to suppress newspapers - Southgate News Herald

The Internet’s Boon to Democracy – New York Times

The Internet's Boon to Democracy
New York Times
Democracy, Disrupted, by Thomas Edsall (column, nytimes.com, March 2), understates the immense benefits the internet has brought to democracy, while overstating its contribution to the traditional moral and ethical constraints in American politics..

Follow this link:
The Internet's Boon to Democracy - New York Times

Grunge And Government: Nirvana’s Krist Novoselic Wants To Save US Democracy – Forbes


Forbes
Grunge And Government: Nirvana's Krist Novoselic Wants To Save US Democracy
Forbes
Nirvana was touring in Germany when the Berlin Wall felland Krist Novoselic, the supergroup's bassist, vividly remembers the line of Trabant cars 27 kilometers long that queued up to enter the west. Shortly thereafter, he saw scores of them parked ...

and more »

Originally posted here:
Grunge And Government: Nirvana's Krist Novoselic Wants To Save US Democracy - Forbes

Dear Democracy Now! visitor, – Democracy Now!

You turn to Democracy Now! for ad-free news you can trust. Maybe you come for our daily headlines. Maybe you come for in-depth stories that expose government and corporate abuses of power. Democracy Now! covers emerging threats to immigrant rights, civil rights, healthcare, the environment, press freedom and education. Democracy Now! is always freeyou'll never hit a paywall. And we produce our daily news hour at a fraction of the budget of a commercial news operation, all without ads, government funding or corporate underwriting. How is this possible? Only with your support. If you and every visitor to our website this month gave just $6, it would cover our basic operating costs for the year. Right now, a generous donor will double your donation to Democracy Now! Pretty exciting, right? So, if you've been waiting to make your contribution to Democracy Now!, today is your day.Please do your part. It takes just a few minutes to make sure that Democracy Now! is there for you and everybody else.

We rely on contributions from you, our viewers and listeners to do our work. If you visit us daily or weekly or even just once a month, now is a great time to make your monthly contribution.

Please do your part today.

Read the original here:
Dear Democracy Now! visitor, - Democracy Now!