Archive for the ‘Democracy’ Category

Ghana's democracy is driving great progress in health and education

Health News of Wednesday, 18 March 2015

Source: theguardian.com

Can democracy lead to development, or is it the other way around? The question remains far from settled, and the stakes have never been higher. Most countries today are formal democracies; two out of every three people live in such countries. Yet, there is growing disillusionment about the way democracy works, and concerns about whether it can deliver in terms of social and economic wellbeing. The phenomenal success of countries like China and other Asian tigers in lifting people out of poverty has also increased the appeal of authoritarian models of development.

This is what makes the case of Ghana so compelling. Over the past two decades, it has experienced one of the worlds most successful transitions to multiparty democracy, and it is one of the few democracies emerging from the third wave of democratisation that has taken root. This is no small achievement, especially in a multi-ethnic setting.

Since 1992, the country has held six elections, and power has been transferred from government to the opposition on two occasions. It has also experienced what several observers call an explosion of political voice, with the growth of an active and engaged civil society that includes professional associations, NGOs, unions, thinktanks and the media.

At the same time, the provision of basic services, especially health and education, has improved dramatically. In 2003, Ghana became one of only a handful of countries not part of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) to provide free and universal health coverage (under the National Health Insurance Scheme); and between 1998 and 2008 child immunisation rates soared from 19% to 70%. In 2007, it became the first country in sub-Saharan Africa to make pre-primary education compulsory, and the number of kindergartens doubled from 6,321 to 13,263 between 2001-02 and 2010-11.

According to research from Afrobarometer, three out of four Ghanaians are satisfied with the quality of their countrys democracy and what it can deliver an approval rating that would be the envy of many other countries.

What has driven this progress in political voice, health and education in Ghana?

Ghanas progress is rooted, in part, in its history, and in particular in the way that state-society relations have evolved over time and the nature of political competition, as well as in the kind of socioeconomic transformation that the country has experienced since independence.

Ghana has a long history of tolerance and accommodation. State formation processes and state-society relations based on the promotion of social cohesion and a unified Ghanaian identity emerged early on, and the notion of a social contract linking state and citizens has been an integral part of its state-and-nation-building project from the start. Leaders and both formal and informal institutions have fostered inclusion and incorporation in ways that transcend narrower ties based on kinship or ethnicity. And an expanding, more urban, and increasingly educated middle class has been actively engaged in political processes and is deeply committed to the countrys democratic values.

Continued here:
Ghana's democracy is driving great progress in health and education

'Supreme Court determination on 19A strengthened democracy'

Leader of the House Minister Lakshman Kiriella, following the Supreme Court determination on the 19th Amendment to the constitution, said the government viewed the court's decision positively and it was a step that strengthened Parliamentary democracy.

He also added that the national unity government, which came to power after presidential polls in January, was ready to transfer enormous powers, wielded by one man, to the 225 MPs in Parliament.

Following are excerpts from his interview.

Q: How will the Supreme Court determination affect the implementation of the constitutional amendment?

A: We welcome the Supreme Court's determination and consider it as a positive development. This determination will not make any impact on the core of the constitutional reforms which we envisaged. The most important aspect of the determination is the provision saying the President must act on the Prime Minister's advice. It is something that strengthens Parliamentary democracy. That is what we have been fighting for over the past two decades.

Q: But, according to the Supreme Court determination, the Prime Minister has lost his say in the appointment of a minister. Don't you consider that as a setback where Parliamentary democracy is concerned?

A: No. Although the President will appoint the Cabinet of ministers he will act in the advice of the Prime Minister. That will ensure checks and balances and the Parliamentary democracy will be strengthened. The setting up of independent commissions, which were introduced under the 17th Amendment, is a major victory for anyone who respects democracy. The most important characteristic in this whole process is the spirit with which the constitutional amendment was introduced. Previously, so many rulers who led this country introduced amendments to the constitution to acquire more power. Such attempts were aimed at consolidating their power. This is the first time, a leader has introduced a constitutional amendment to relinquish power. That is something every political party should appreciate. Especially with the setting up of independent commissions, the powers which were previously vested in the Executive President, has been transferred to independent bodies. This is the sort of change 62.5 million people in this country voted for at the last presidential election.

Q: You stated a few days ago that the Sri Lanka Freedom Party was facing a split. Will that possible "split" prevent the government from securing a two thirds majority for the constitutional amendment?

A: The SLFP is facing a split and that was quite evident when the treasury bills regulation was taken for vote. Earlier, the Opposition Leader said they would not go for a vote on the resolution and a few hours later, a group of opposition MPs went for a vote. Even the Opposition Leader asked his members not to stab in the back. So clearly there is a division. But, I think when the President convenes his Parliamentary group, he will be in a position to address the matter and draw their support.

Link:
'Supreme Court determination on 19A strengthened democracy'

Orubebe’s Action A Disgrace To Nigeria’s Democracy – Okorocha – Video


Orubebe #39;s Action A Disgrace To Nigeria #39;s Democracy - Okorocha
Prominent Igbo leaders in the South East, governorship candidates of the APC from the zone, party chieftains came together to celebrate the victory of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in...

By: Channels Television

See the article here:
Orubebe's Action A Disgrace To Nigeria's Democracy - Okorocha - Video

Wealth, Health, and Democracy in East Asia and Latin America – Video


Wealth, Health, and Democracy in East Asia and Latin America
James W. McGuire, Ph.D. - Professor of Government at Wesleyan University Why do some societies fare well, and others poorly, at reducing the risk of early death? In his award-winning book,...

By: centerforpolicystud

Read more:
Wealth, Health, and Democracy in East Asia and Latin America - Video

The Democracy Establishment – Video


The Democracy Establishment
Sarah Bush, Ph.D. - Assistant Professor of Political Science at Temple University When U.S. government democracy assistance was launched three decades ago, it fostered real change, as in...

By: centerforpolicystud

Continue reading here:
The Democracy Establishment - Video