Archive for the ‘Democrat’ Category

In Big Cities, Democrats Have Failed to Reform the Police – City Journal

The death of George Floyd, an African-American, at the hands of a white Minneapolis police officer has sparked weeks of urban protestssome marked by looting and violenceacross the United States. It has also brought fierce condemnations of President Donald Trump. New York City mayor Bill de Blasio partly blamed the president for the unrest, noting theres been an uptick in tension and hatred and division since he came along, while Chicago mayor Lori Lightfoot said that she had a message for the president: Its two words. It begins with F and it ends with U. The New York Times, meantime, excoriated Trump for what the paper described as a violent ultimatum issued to unruly protestors, and former vice president Joe Biden charged Trump with calling for violence against American citizens during a moment of pain.

Less anger, though, was directed at Minneapoliss political establishment. The Democratic-Farmer-Labor Party (a merger of Minnesotas Democrats and the states Farmer-Labor Party) has run the city since 1975. Instead, the New York Times ran a mild piece observing that, for Democratic leaders of Minneapolis and other cities, the violent events were testing their campaign promises and principles. The protests, the paper opined judiciously, necessitated careful calibration of liberal leaders, between projecting empathy for the protesters and denouncing property destruction and theft. (The Times did acknowledge that the Minneapolis police department, currently run by a black police chief, has a long history of accusations of abuse.)

Floyds death was only the latest in a series of disturbing incidents that have fed a growing belief among African-Americans that theyre a target of abusive cops. For many, todays tragic events evoke the experiences of the 1960s, when blacks who had moved into northern cities clashed with hostile police departments, setting off similar destructive riots. To some Negroes police have come to symbolize white power, white racism and white repression, the Kerner Commissions 1968 report on the upheavals of that era declared. Nearly 50 years later, the Justice Department, in a report on the Baltimore Police Department in the aftermath of Freddie Grays death in police custody in 2015, concluded that the relationship between the Baltimore Police Department and many of the communities it serves is broken.

Though both reports conclusions were hotly contested, its indisputable that in each period, the principal controversies largely revolved around police departments in Democrat-controlled cities, with a few notable exceptions, like Ferguson, Missouri. Despite decades of Democratic Party governance and numerous promises of reform, these citiesBaltimore, Chicago, and Minneapolis are notable casescontinue to struggle with relations between the police and minority communities; in some cases, those relations have even regressed. The media rarely acknowledge this monumental failing of the party, and it seems to evoke little self-reflection among urban Democrats themselves.

The Democratic Party of the late 1950s and 1960s was principally a blue-collar political movement. It dominated northeastern and midwestern cities through powerful local political machines dispensing patronage to supportersincluding plum positions in police departments. Corruption was endemic, and it often occurred at the expense of black residents.

Those conditions set the stage for some of the most explosive riots of that period. In July 1967, two Newark police officers arrested a black cab driver and dragged him into a precinct house, where he was beaten. Protests erupted and swiftly turned violent, lasting four days and costing 26 lives. Investigations in the aftermath uncovered widespread corruption. Newarks mayor, Hugh Addonizio, had returned from serving in Congress to run the city because, he reportedly said, Theres no money in Washington, but you can make a million bucks as mayor of Newark. The citys police department was tied to organized crime; mob bosses had helped elect Addonizio, and directly picked his police commissioner, a man widely disliked in the black community. That same summer, a Detroit police raid on an after-hours club hosting a homecoming party for two African-American Vietnam vets sparked five days of rioting that saw 43 people die in the city. As in Newark, black residents complained that the police were corruptfor example, taking bribes to ignore street crime. Reports issued after the riots showed that the department had strong ties to local organized crime.

The Newark and Detroit riots, and riots in more than 150 other cities, that summer brought sweeping political changes, including the election of a generation of new black urban Democratic leaders. But policing remained a glaring problem. In Detroit, voters elected radical labor organizer Coleman Young, an African-American, as mayor in 1974. He went to war with his own police department, slashing its ranks by 20 percent and installing a black police commissioner, with instructions to reduce enforcement in the city radically. Both strategieshiring more black police leaders (and officers, generally) and reducing police presencebecame common in major cities. Crime exploded in Detroit, and in most American urban areas; as middle-class residents, predominantly white, left for safer suburbs, poorer blacks, living in increasingly dangerous city neighborhoods, were the biggest victims.

The story only changed when a few criminologists, led by the Manhattan Institutes George Kelling, and visionary police leaders, like William J. Bratton, began to advocate for community-based policing, including enforcement of quality-of-life offenses, and the deployment of more sophisticated data to target crime hot spots, to bring order back to urban neighborhoods. After Bratton became New Yorks police chief under Republican mayor Rudolph Giuliani in 1994, crime started to fall dramaticallyincluding violent felonies, which fell by 70 percent.

As crime declined, so did some key indicators of police misconduct. The New York Police Department keeps extensive records on how often officers fire their guns, and the numbers tell a powerful story. In 1991, at the peak of the citys crime wave under Mayor David Dinkins, officers discharged their guns 307 times. Ten years ago, in a much safer city, police fired their guns fewer than 100 timesand last year, they did so just 52 times, representing a greater than 80 percent decline from 1991.

About a decade ago, a narrative reemerged in America that police departments are deeply racist and single out minority residents disproportionately. The timing seemed unusual. America had just elected its first black president, which might have signaled that the countrys racist past was firmly behind itcertainly in the sense of systemic or institutional racism. And yet, with Barack Obama in the White House, individual conflicts between the police and African-Americans were not downplayed but amplified, at times by the president himself. Speaking about the case of Eric Garner, a New Yorker arrested for selling contraband cigarettes who died in police custody after resisting arrest, Obama said that the incident spoke to larger issues that weve been talking about now for the last week, the last month, the last year, and, sadly, for decades, and that is the concern on the part of too many minority communities that law enforcement is not working with them and dealing with them in a fair way.

New Yorks progressive mayor, Bill de Blasio, found larger meaning in the confrontation, explaining that he told his son Dante, who is half-black, that he faced extra danger when interacting with the police. With Dante, very early on, we said, Look, if a police officer stops you, do everything he tells you to do. Dont move suddenly. Dont reach for your cellphone, said de Blasio. Because we knew, sadly, theres a greater chance it might be misinterpreted if it was a young man of color. Obamas attorney general, Eric Holder, used his bully pulpit to argue repeatedly that police and public school officials disproportionately and unfairly targeted young blacks. Holder led federal investigations of several police departments and used the Department of Justice to force teachers and administrators to reduce suspensions of African-Americans students.

Though statistical evidence showed no disproportionate targeting of blacks, its clear that many African-Americans believed this narrative of the Obama years. And the rhetoric surrounding the 2020 unrest suggests that many still do. So why did so little change under a Democratic president, and in typically Democratic-run cities? The answers might lie in looking closely at some of the most egregious confrontations that occurred in blue cities over the last few years.

In October 2014, 17-year-old Laquan McDonald was shot at least 16 times by a police officer on a Chicago street and killed. Initial reports claimed that he was walking erratically down the street, carried a knife, and lunged at the police. Testimony from witnesses and other evidence, however, cast doubt on the official version of events. The city turned down numerous requests to release video of the incident, which took place in the middle of a difficult reelection campaign for then-mayor Rahm Emanuel, who eventually won a run-off for a second term in April 2015. When the city, under pressure, eventually provided access to several videos, the evidence showed that McDonald was walking away from the cop when shot. The release provoked widespread protests, and the officer was eventually convicted of second-degree murder.

Emanuel refused calls to resign, despite emails obtained under a Freedom of Information Act request showing that he and members of his administration were aware that the videos existed. Instead, he established a review board headed by Lori Lightfoot, then president of the Chicago Police Board, to recommend police reforms, which a Justice Department report deemed essential to restore trust between the force and the community. While Chicago, governed by Democrats since 1931, made some changes, such as providing officers with tasers, which they could use as an alternative to their guns, no sweeping reforms or reorganization of the force took place. Lightfoot ran for mayor three years later, promising that she would finish the job of reform. In office for a year, with violence spiking in the city, she came under fire in minority communities for not being tough on crime. She has resorted to some of the same strategies that Emanuel was criticized for, including flooding crime-plagued neighborhoods with extra cops.

While the McDonald case festered in Chicago, in April 2015, Freddie Gray, a 25-year-old black man who had been arrested for carrying a knife, sustained head injuries while riding in the back of a Baltimore Police Department van and died in the hospital. Protests broke out shortly after, and some were violent, involving looting and arson, prompting Maryland governor Larry Hogan to declare a state of emergency and send in the National Guard. During the riot, the citys mayor, Stephanie Rawlings-Blake, was criticized for declaring, While we tried to make sure that (protesters) were protected from the cars and the other things that were going on, we also gave those who wished to destroy space to do that as well.

Under intense criticism for her role during the riots, she decided not to run for reelection. A subsequent Department of Justice investigation accused the city police, headed by an African-American commissioner, of making unconstitutional stops and searches and of using excessive force. The task of reform fell to Rawlings-Blakes successor, Catherine Pugh, the eighth consecutive Democrat elected mayor since 1971, who ran on a platform of restraining the police. Like many of her Democratic predecessors, her strategy revolved around reducing policingbut as police withdrew, crime and disorder spread. Murders, which had declined to as low as 197 annually, spiked to more than 300. Pugh had to resign after just two and a half years in office for pressuring groups to buy a book she had written. She eventually pled guilty to conspiracy and tax evasion and was sentenced to three years in prison.

Though no such postmortems have taken place yet on the death of George Floyd in Minneapolis, we can already see the likely direction they will take. The Minneapolis Police Department hired a black police chief in 2017, and he pledged to institute broad reforms, but hes faced resistance. One problem typical of Democratic-controlled cities is that public-sector unions are powerful, and the Minneapolis police union has apparently stymied efforts by the new chief to discipline and suspend officers accused of misconduct. During recessions [the city] would give the union management rights in lieu of money, Robert Olson, former chief of police in Minneapolis, told Reuters two years ago. Were not talking about just one union contract. Were talking about incremental changes in contracts over years that cumulatively, suddenly, theres all of these hoops, which makes it far more difficult for chiefs to sustain discipline. Its an old obstacle that the citys political leaders havent rushed to fix, despite years of complaints from minorities, because unions are deeply embedded in the political landscape. Minneapolis has one of the highest rates of unionization of public employees of any metro area in the country.

Speaking on TV during the recent unrest, Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden promised, if elected, to make police brutality a key issue for his administration. It was the latest in a long line of promises by leading Democrats to address what they see as police misconduct toward African-Americans. One wonders when they will be called to account for their repeated failures to do something about it.

Steven Malanga is the senior editor of City Journal, the George M. Yeager Fellow at the Manhattan Institute, and the author of Shakedown: The Continuing Conspiracy Against the American Taxpayer.

Photo by Joshua Lott/Getty Images

See the rest here:
In Big Cities, Democrats Have Failed to Reform the Police - City Journal

I actually would be tougher: A Democrat’s plan for changing the relationship with China after Trump – Yahoo Finance

Representative Tom Malinowski represents New Jerseys 7th District in Congress, but before that he served as an assistant secretary of state in the Obama administration and in the National Security Council during the Clinton administration.

Hes emerged as a leading voice on how Washington might shift its relationship with China in the coming years with a possible Democratic administration.

President Donald Trump has repeatedly attacked former Vice President Joe Biden as someone who would give in to China. Malinowski told Yahoo Finance he aims to flip the perception that Democrats wouldnt stand up to China.

I actually would be tougher, and hope that Joe Biden would be tougher, he said during an appearance Wednesday on Yahoo Finances On the Move.

Rep. Tom Malinowski, D-N.J., during a hearing in 2019. (Tom William/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

On trade, Malinowski says he agrees with Trump. We needed to take on the Chinese on trade, he said, while also building alliances with European and other Asian nations to make any sanctions or tariffs actually stick.

The congressman has outlined his plan on building coalitions in a variety of forums, including a recent Washington Post op-ed.

He argues that the Trump administration has alienated allies while also not being focused on forcing China into structural changes.

Weve got to be up to the challenge, he said. This is not rocket science."

Rep. Malinowski with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. (Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images)

What I hear from the Trump administration is just, Please buy some of our American wheat and all is forgiven, says Malinowski.

During the primary campaign, Democrats often shied away from offering specifics on what they would do different than Trump on trade with China. Biden often went the furthest. During the September 12 debate, he said, You need to organize the world to take on China, to stop the corrupt practices that are underway.

He added, [The United States makes] up 25 percent of the world economy. We need another 25 percent to join us.

Malinowski endorsed Biden in January, saying that as a former assistant secretary of state, he is eager to support a nominee with the experience to restore the place of respect America once occupied on the world stage.

Malinowski also discussed what do to about the clashes between protestors in Hong Kong and Chinese authorities.

The strongest, the toughest thing we can do in support of the protesters in Hong Kong is to signal that we will allow the people of Hong Kong to rebuild their experiment in capitalism and democracy in the United States," he said.

In recent weeks, authorities in Beijing announced what they are calling national security laws that activists say would curb freedoms and end the traditional "one country, two systems" relationship between Hong Kong and mainland China.

Representative Malinowski represents a district in Northern New Jersey and recently joined a Black Lives Matter protest in the town of Millburn. (Rich Graessle/Icon Sportswire)

Story continues

We will open our doors to refugees from Hong Kong, he says, arguing that doing so would be the most important deterrent that we can put into place against increased Chinese repression there.

The Trump administration has begun the process of withdrawing special trade benefits for Hong Kong in response to the crisis. But Trump also recently said he was not considering placing sanctions on Chinese President Xi Jinping personally.

The battle lines for Democrats and Republicans over China have become quite clear in recent weeks with each side seemingly in a contest to accuse the other of being the weaker party on China.

In a recent speech, Biden said that Trump has repeatedly praised Chinas containment response, despite a litany of public appeals, including from me, not to bet American lives and the U.S. economy on the word of the Chinese government.

During all the election-year back and forth, Malinowski has tried to make progress on China where he can find it. He recently joined a bipartisan letter to Apple (AAPL), which included signers from Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) to Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) to condemn what they called the companys censorship at the behest of the Chinese government.

For Malinowski, the goal is to change the overall focus. He says the United States needs to show the world that we are, in every way, different from the Chinese Communist Party.

Ben Werschkul is a producer for Yahoo Finance in Washington, DC.

Read more:

Senate moves to delist Chinese companies from US stock exchanges

Why Trump is moving closer to punishing China for the coronavirus

The Democrats have no answer to Trumps reckless trade war

Read the latest financial and business news from Yahoo Finance

Follow Yahoo Finance on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Flipboard, LinkedIn, YouTube, and reddit.

Go here to see the original:
I actually would be tougher: A Democrat's plan for changing the relationship with China after Trump - Yahoo Finance

Democratic leaders clash with Black Lives Matter activists over ‘defund the police’ – NBC News

WASHINGTON Painted in bright yellow letters outside the White House are the words "DEFUND THE POLICE": a rallying cry for a movement to combat police brutality and racism that has exploded across the nation and caused nervousness among Democrats.

Protesters around the country demanding justice for George Floyd's death waved "Defund the Police!" signs at rallies in major cities on a weekend when Joe Biden officially became the presumptive Democratic nominee to face President Donald Trump in the fall.

As Trump seizes on the slogan to paint his opponents as radicals who envision a world of lawlessness and anarchy, Biden and most other Democrats are resisting the left's calls and floating more modest measures to curtail bad police behavior.

No, I don't support defunding the police," Biden told "CBS Evening News" on Monday. "I support conditioning federal aid to police based on whether or not they meet certain basic standards of decency and honorableness and, in fact, are able to demonstrate they can protect the community."

Johnetta Elzie, a civil rights activist and organizer, said Biden's calls for "reform" sound stale, mealy-mouthed and out of touch as "black people are still dying behind these antiquated ideas and policies."

"It's not enough. Joe Biden knows it's not enough. Joe Biden's team knows it's not enough. It's not at all answering the calls of the moment," Elzie said. "People have been saying to anyone who's f---ing up in this moment: Read the room. People are calling for defunding the police.

"People in power politicians and policymakers are still talking about reform. We're beyond that. We're over that," she said. "If they wanted reform, they would have done it six years ago when we actually had the chance to. But that's not what happened."

The clash pits an ideological movement aiming to transform the national debate against a Democratic electoral apparatus whose overriding goal is to defeat Trump. While activists say they believe the need for radical change is worth taking political risks, party leaders say they worry about alienating moderate white voters who sympathize with the protesters' cause but still support police.

"As somebody who's been through a great number of political wars, branding matters," former Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo., said Monday on MSNBC. "My fear about the term 'defund the police' is it will be misused and abused by people who will want to scare people."

Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings.

Trump campaign spokesman Tim Murtaugh told reporters that the "defund the police" movement was "consuming" the Democratic Party and argued that Biden "does not have the strength to stand up to the extremists who are now calling the shots in the party."

And appearing on MSNBC, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., sidestepped the issue, saying that police funding is "a local matter" and that her focus is to "change policy to make our policing more just."

She and other Democratic congressional leaders introduced a police overhaul package Monday that would outlaw chokeholds and "no knock" warrants, require body cameras and create a variety of mechanisms to punish bad officers.

Rashad Robinson, who leads the civil rights group Color of Change, said the Democratic legislation "has some work to do."

"It's important that we're actually seeing forward movement on policing," he said. "But there are a number of places from dealing with grand juries to all the ways in which police get so many different rules after they shoot someone and kill someone that have to be dealt with."

Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, a Democrat, was loudly booed and forced to retreat from a gathering of demonstrators Saturday after he responded to a question about whether he would commit to defunding the police by saying, "I do not support the full abolition of the police."

When pressed to explain what the slogan means in policy terms, activists say "defund the police" is not actually a call for a country with no cops.

"It does not mean a world where we do not have safety and justice. It does not mean a world where we do not have order," Robinson said. "But what it does mean is that right now we seem to try to solve all of our society's problems by increasing the role and responsibility of law enforcement, and it has not worked."

Elzie said "defund the police" means "reducing police budgets, to me, down to the bare minimum."

"And seeing that money go to public schools in the city would make me extremely happy. Or investing in mental health services in the state. There's so many other things we should do with that money," she said. "If the police want to go buy M16s, they should f---ing organize a bake sale."

As Trump rallies his base against calls to "defund the police" and Biden distances himself from them, the movement is seen as unlikely to get its wishes. Yet it appears to be having an impact on the debate, as some major cities, like Los Angeles and New York, discuss reductions in police funding.

Advocates point to other movements over the past decade that have pushed radical-sounding ideas that altered the debate. The "Medicare for All" movement turned a public insurance option into a consensus position among Democrats after moderates in the party killed it in 2009. The "abolish ICE" effort nudged mainstream lawmakers to call for fewer deportations and to limit the power of Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

"It's not the job of activists to present poll-tested ideas," said Sean McElwee, a left-wing organizer and data scientist who popularized #AbolishICE. "It's the job of activists to demand we imagine a world built on fundamentally different assumptions. We've already seen a number of concrete and actionable policies that can fundamentally change the way we understand policing in this country."

Download the NBC News app for breaking news and politics

Conservatives used the tactic effectively under President Barack Obama. Tea party calls to "abolish the IRS" helped fuel IRS budget cuts of about 20 percent during the last decade. The 2011 push to amend the Constitution to require balanced budgets, which likely would have forced steep cuts in Social Security, led to Obama's signing $1 trillion in spending reductions that summer.

"A flat tax of 8 percent? Hell, why not? Just ask for it. You're not going to get it," said Brendan Steinhauser, a Republican consultant who was working in the tea party movement at the time. "On these sorts of things stake your position, ask for everything, knowing you're going to get your politicians to move a little bit."

Steinhauser said Biden "isolates himself from the backlash by finding a safe moderate position that is reasonable that calls for reform and calls for transparency and better training and punishment for cops that act poorly and criminally."

"His instincts are right on this one from a political standpoint," he said. "Republicans want nothing more than for Biden to embrace the most radical ideas."

Full coverage of George Floyds death and protests around the country

Originally posted here:
Democratic leaders clash with Black Lives Matter activists over 'defund the police' - NBC News

Joe Biden is ‘more receptive’ to progressives than past Democrats, Bernie Sanders says – CNBC

Former Vice President Joe Biden's close relationship with Sen. Bernie Sanders and willingness to engage with progressives could spell a difference between the 2020 presidential contest and former Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton's failed 2016 bid, Sanders said in an interview in The New Yorker magazine published on Tuesday.

"I think the difference now is that, between you and me, I have a better relationship with Joe Biden than I had with Hillary Clinton, and that Biden has been much more receptive to sitting down and talking with me and other progressives than we have seen in the past,"the Vermont lawmaker said.

Sanders competed against Clinton in 2016, and was the last Democrat standing against Biden during the 2020 primary contest. Democrats loyal to Clinton, with whom Sanders had an icy rapport, have criticized Sanders for what they saw as his insufficient effort to get his progressive backers behind her in 2016 after she defeated him in the primary.

Pressed to address that criticism, Sanders told The New Yorker that he did everything he could to get Clinton elected. But he said there was a misconception about how much influence candidates, on their own, can have on their supporters' votes.

"There is a myth out there that all a candidate has to say, whether it's Bernie Sanders or anybody else, to millions of people who voted for him or her, is, 'I want you to do this,' and every single person is going to fall in line," Sanders said. "That's just not the way it works in a democracy."

This time around, Sanders again lost to a candidate located ideologically to his right. But, Sanders said, Biden's apparent willingness to shift to the left on some issues could move the needle.

"I think you're going to see him being rather strong on the need for a new economy in America that does a lot better job in representing working families than we currently have," Sanders said. "He has told me that he wants to be as strong as possible in terms of climate change, and I look forward to hearing his proposals."

A spokesperson for Clinton did not respond to a request for comment.

Sanders endorsed Biden in April shortly after he dropped out of the race. The endorsement, which came far earlier in the cycle than his 2016 endorsement of Clinton, was seen as a major boost to Biden's campaign.

The two candidates announced at the time of Sanders' endorsement that their campaigns would form joint task forces to work out compromises on policy in six major areas: The economy, education, climate change, criminal justice, immigration reform and health care.

Sanders didn't say how much progress the task forces had made in the intervening months, though he said the two men were talking by phone. On the issue that most animated Sanders' political rise making health care free at the point of use Biden has notpublicly budged, even as Covid-19 has swept through the country and led to unprecedented job losses.

Addressing the task forces, Sanders said, "We'll see what the fruits of those discussions are." He said he didn't want to sugarcoat the differences between the two men ideologically.

"He has been open and personable and friendly, but his views and my views are very different, in some areas more than others," Sanders said. He added:"But Joe has been open to having his people sit down with some of the most progressive folks in America, and that's a good sign."

In a statement, Biden spokesman Andrew Bates said that "Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders are friends and share a steadfast belief that we need a government that will deliver for working families."

"Senator Sanders and his team have been extraordinary partners in offering advice and support on the biggest challenges of our day, such as overcoming climate change and rebuilding the American middle class especially after the COVID-19 outbreak," Bates said.

Also in the interview, Sanders, a self-avowed democratic socialist, held out hope that a future candidate with his beliefs will be more successful than he was.

"Biden just mopped us up with older people," Sanders said. "On the other hand, even in states where we did poorly, and lost, we won a majority of young people, forty or younger. That's the future of America."

A spokesperson for Sanders didn't respond to an inquiry about whether he wanted to elaborate on his remarks.

Biden is currently leading President Donald Trump in national surveys by about 8 percentage points, according to an average of recent polls collected by RealClearPolitics.

Go here to read the rest:
Joe Biden is 'more receptive' to progressives than past Democrats, Bernie Sanders says - CNBC

Letter To The Editor: This Is Not A Democrat Or Republican Thing It’s An American Thing! – Los Alamos Daily Post

By PHIL EWINGAlbuquerque

I read with interest the opinion articles written by Anissa Tinnin (link) and Juan Jose Gonzales (link) and came to realize (as most of us have) that we are very much a polarized and partisan nation.

We have become very isolated in our lives and politics. As President John F. Kennedy once said: For in the final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our childrens future. And we are all mortal.

The Republican Party of today is not the party of Lincoln, Teddy Roosevelt, or Eisenhower. These Presidents had compassion and put their country before themselves. The Republican Party was formed as a political party that was against slavery in America during the Lincoln era.

President Teddy Roosevelt was known as Teddy the Trust Buster because he did not want large monopolies dictating the economy in our country but rather promoting a free enterprise system.

President Eisenhower envisioned and created the interstate highway system in America.

Yet, Anissa Tinnin insists that progressives or as some may say, liberals, will destroy traditional New Mexico values. We all know that Democrats and Republicans alike want to promote these values and not destroy them.

Instilling fear into people is not the answer but rather solving problems through cooperation is the best way to move forward.

This is not a Democrat or Republican thing, its an American thing! Together and I mean together, we CAN solve the problems of today! And once again, as President John F. Kennedy said, If you mean by liberal someone who looks ahead and not behind, someone who welcomes new ideas without rigid reactions, someone who cares about the welfare of peopletheir health, their housing, their schools, their jobs, their civil rights, their civil liberties. If that is what they mean by liberal, then I am proud to be a liberal.

Continue reading here:
Letter To The Editor: This Is Not A Democrat Or Republican Thing It's An American Thing! - Los Alamos Daily Post