Archive for the ‘Democrat’ Category

Democrat terminated from Iowa job after election win – Axios

Sean Bagniewski. Photo courtesy of the Iowa Legislature

Polk County Democratic Party chair Sean Bagniewski was terminated from a state government contract position shortly after winning election to the Iowa House, he tells Axios.

Why it matters: Iowa law requires workers elected to a government office be granted a leave of absence from their regular employment.

Catch up fast: Bagniewski was an account manager for Maximus Health Services, a company contracted to help evaluate client care in Iowa's Medicaid program.

State of play: Iowa Medicaid director Elizabeth Matney notified Maximus in a Nov. 16 letter that Bagniewski's position is full time and that the department doesn't allow exceptions to the contract "nor do we intend to moving forward."

Of note: Iowa legislative sessions begin in early January and typically meet most weekdays through April.

What they're saying: Iowa did not request Maximus terminate Bagniewski, a spokesperson for the Iowa Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) said in a statement to Axios.

Zoom in: Iowa's law does not require employers to pay workers while they are on leave for their elected duties.

What's next: Bagniewski has sought legal advice but declined to say whether he plans to file a wrongful termination lawsuit.

Read more from the original source:
Democrat terminated from Iowa job after election win - Axios

Democrats are gaming out how to run against an indicted Trump – NBC News

WASHINGTON When news broke earlier this month that Donald Trump would be indicted in New York, leaders of a pro-Joe Biden group met privately to decide what to do. Should they fire off tweets broadcasting what had happened, or maybe send an email blast opining on Trumps fate?

In the end, they did nothing.

Why get your hands dirty if you dont have to? a person familiar with the groups thinking said, speaking on condition of anonymity to talk freely. When you get into the ring with him [Trump] in this capacity, youre no better than he is.

No guidebook exists for dealing with the first former president ever to face criminal charges, let alone one who is the current front-runner for the GOP nomination. Lacking any precedent, an ecosystem of Democratic strategists, Biden loyalists and outside groups is gaming out how to wring advantage from Trumps mushrooming legal woes.

Theyve reached no consensus and, for now, are feeling their way through a fraught moment that presents both opportunity and peril for all sides, interviews with more than a dozen political operatives suggest. When opponents are struggling, every campaigns instinct is to capitalize on their misfortune. Yet Trump is presumed innocent in a legal system that Biden has pledged to uphold, creating a conundrum for the operatives working to defeat Trump in 2024.

Democrats are a party guided by lawyers, said Simon Rosenberg, a longtime party strategist.

With more criminal charges possible in the coming months, Trumps indictment in Manhattan may prove a dry run for how Bidens outside supporters respond. Georgia authorities are investigating Trumps efforts to reverse his election loss in 2020 and wrest the states 16 electoral votes from Biden. At the same time, federal prosecutors are looking into Trumps handling of classified records after he left the White House along with his broader effort to retain power despite his defeat.

A group called Facts First USA is plunging in, planning to showcase Trumps difficulties in digital ads and social media messages while targeting congressional Republicans whove chosen to defend him. The group convened a Zoom call to discuss the indictment after it was made public Tuesday and has since had additional conversations about how it can be leveraged for our purposes, said David Brock, president of Facts First.

The indictments, he said, are going to be the gift that keeps on giving for Democrats.

Another group is trying to nail down an effective message. Anticipating that a Trump indictment in New York was imminent, a coalition of liberal pollsters late last month tested various ways to explain his legal troubles. Navigator Research surveyed more than 1,000 registered voters Democrats, Republicans and independents alike to gauge the best way to rebut Trumps argument that he is the victim of a witch hunt.

In a memo titled, Trump Indictment: A Guide for Advocates, Navigator Research concluded that the most effective counter-argument is that No one is above the law, not even a former president, citing their finding that 61% found that idea more convincing than Trumps claim of political persecution.

The message also draws a useful contrast from the Democrats perspective. If he decides to run again, Biden is expected to portray himself as a symbol of stability, compared to the tumult that surrounds Trump. Bidens oft-repeated message that he is trying to restore the nations soul and respect the rule of law could seem especially pertinent amid the spectacle of a GOP presidential candidate fighting to stay out of jail.

The criminal charges that Trump faces are just a reminder of the chaos that Trump brings, said Jenn Ridder, a senior official in Bidens 2020 campaign who is now seen as a top contender to be his new campaign manager. Trump is the chaos; President Biden is working to help the American people.

Still, many in the party are holding back, preferring to keep a tight focus on Bidens record with the idea that Trumps difficulties will draw so much attention that no amplification will be needed.

This will block out the sun and supplant all other issues for the time being, said Zac Petkanas, a longtime Democratic strategist. So, I dont anticipate [taking action] in the near term other than helping ensure that the media covers this correctly and helping them debunk misinformation from Trump allies, who are trying to diminish what is in fact a very serious criminal offense.

At his arraignment Tuesday, Trump pleaded not guilty to the 34 felony counts of falsifying business records related to hush money payments made in 2016 to women who alleged past encounters with then-presidential candidate Trump. Trump has consistently denied wrongdoing, as well as the encounters.

For Democrats, another complication is the belief among some inside the party that the indictment might not damage Trump all that much. Details of the pay-for-silence allegations have been widely known for the last five years.

Theres a realization on the Democratic side that a lot of Donald Trumps character flaws are baked into the cake and theres limited mileage we can get out of them, said Lis Smith, a Democratic strategist and adviser to Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigiegs 2020 presidential bid.

But the calculus could always change depending on what happens next. Some Biden allies view the case in Georgia as more consequential. If the Fulton County district attorney leading the inquiry files criminal charges, they suggest, that might resonate more with voters as it evokes Trumps attempts to defy the popular will.

Georgia is a bigger deal, said a national Democratic strategist, speaking on condition of anonymity to talk more freely. Its a reminder to voters that Donald Trump tried to overturn an election and the result of those efforts was Jan. 6, when pro-Trump rioters stormed the U.S. Capitol.

(Trump has said he did nothing wrong and falsely claimed rampant fraud altered the vote in Georgia.)

Inside the White House, Biden and his staff are sticking to a simple script: say nothing. Anything Biden says about Trumps entanglements would invite complaints that hes meddling in the multiple criminal investigations that the former president faces.

The charges announced last week in Manhattan surprised the White House. Bidens chief of staff, Jeff Zients, alerted him after aides learned of the indictment from news reports, White House aides said. Privately, people close to Biden have been trying to think through what the indictment might ultimately mean for the country, with one suggesting that it could speed up the federal investigation led by special counsel Jack Smith. (Its not clear why that would be the case; there is no indication that Jack Smith is taking cues from the prosecution underway in New York).

One perk of having essentially cleared the field in the 2024 Democratic primary is that Biden can say as much or as little as he wants, knowing that the entire party apparatus is looking after his interests.

As he juggles court hearings and campaign rallies, debates and depositions, Trump may not be able to expect the same level of fealty. Though most GOP candidates have voiced support for Trump and said his prosecution is politically motivated, his most serious rival, Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, took a veiled swipe at him by repeating some of the more embarrassing details of the case. I dont know what goes into paying hush money to a porn star to secure silence over some type of alleged affair, said DeSantis.

That the partys various factions coalesced behind Biden would have been hard to predict when his presidency began. The partys liberal wing, in particular, had bristled at Bidens refusal to embrace a Medicare-for-all health care system. But he has quelled internal dissent.

Asked about that dynamic, Rep. Ro Khanna, a California Democrat who co-chaired Sen. Bernie Sanders 2020 presidential bid, said: Who in their right mind would want to run against Donald Trump? God bless the president for wanting to run. Would you want your family to go through this against Donald Trump?

Peter Nicholas is a senior national political reporter for NBC News.

Carol E. Lee contributed.

See original here:
Democrats are gaming out how to run against an indicted Trump - NBC News

Woodland Weekly Police Report | March 31 through April 7 – Woodland Daily Democrat

DAILY DEMOCRAT ARCHIVES

Exhibition of Speed: On April 1 at around 10 p.m. an officer saw a Dodge truck doing burnouts and driving at a high rate of speed on East and Cross Street. The officer stopped the vehicle and contacted the driver, a 27-year-old resident of Yolo County. The driver was cited for the exhibition of speed, and his truck was impounded.

Burglary: On April 2 at 6:25 p.m., officers responded to a residence on the 2600 Block of Banks Drive regarding a suspect entering the residents garage and taking a Cannondale road bike valued at around $3,000.00. After the investigating officer took the report and obtained video surveillance, he observed the suspect riding the stolen bike at the AM/PM on County Rd 102 and Hays Lane. The officer stopped the suspect, Lance Chicago Moore Jr a 43-year-old Woodland resident. Moore was booked into Yolo County Jail for burglary and grand theft.

HOST worked with occupants of several RVs and vehicle in the Goodwill parking lot assisting them in moving locations.

HOST made 68 contacts, offered services to 26 of them of which 5 accepted services. There were 22 camps located and 10 camps cleaned up. There were 12 downtown patrols and 9 business contacts made.

Best in Local News

Your email is already registered. Please subscribe to Daily Democrat to continue.

$1 for 6 Months of Unlimited Digital Access

Get this deal

Already a subscriber? Login

View more onDaily Democrat

See original here:
Woodland Weekly Police Report | March 31 through April 7 - Woodland Daily Democrat

Indiana Democrat Forces Marijuana Legalization Vote In House, But … – Marijuana Moment

Indiana Democratic lawmakers came up with a crafty way to force a House vote on marijuana legalization on Thursday after Republican leadership has blocked the issue from being considered in session after session, though the chamber ultimately rejected the reform.

The House took up Senate Bill 20legislation concerning rules for businesses that sell alcohol and hemp productson second reading. Part of what the measure would do is create a regulatory distinction for craft hemp products that could be marketed to adults 21 and older.

Rep. Justin Moed (D) tried to expand the bill with an amendment proposing to strike language defining hemp as cannabis containing no more than 0.3 percent THC by dry weight, which is also the federal definition of legal hemp.

By removing that language, the legislation would have effectively served as a vehicle for marijuana legalization, simply replacing the regulations for the sale of craft hemp, including flower, with cannabis of any THC level.

The amendment failed, however, in a 58-33 vote.

Weve had a really hard time getting an up-or-down vote on the issue, Moed told Marijuana Moment in a phone interview on Thursday. So the way it was drafted was done in a way that they would not be able to use the rules to prevent us from having to vote on it, which is what theyve been doing up to this point.

We had to just basically expand what they were doing with craft hemp, as opposed to doing a direct legalization bill or amendment dealing with that because they would just rule it out of order and prevent us from having an up-or-down vote, he explained.

Six Republicans joined all but one Democrat in supporting the amendment, the representative noted.

Time and time again, we are blocked from casting a vote on cannabis reform in IN. Today, thanks to some creativity from House Dems, we finally got a vote, Rep. Blake Johnson (D) said in a Twitter post on Thursday. If you want to know who is actually for and who is against cannabis in Indiana, the record is now clear.

Advancing marijuana reform has proved challenging in the Indiana legislature, where Republicans hold supermajorities in both chambers.

A bill to decriminalize possession of up to two ounces of cannabis received a hearing in February, but its not expected to move any further this session.

Measures to legalize and regulate adult-use marijuana were pre-filed for the 2023 session, but they have not received committee consideration yet.

Rep. Cindy Ziemke (R) said late last year that she planned to introduce a legalization bill, but the then-assistant majority caucus chair resigned at the end of the last session.

At the beginning of the year, former Indiana Sen. Jim Merritt (R) recognized the challenges of pushing the issue forward in the legislature and advocated for legislation to at least form a commission tasked with studying legalization.

Marijuana Moment is tracking more than 1,000 cannabis, psychedelics and drug policy bills in state legislatures and Congress this year. Patreon supporters pledging at least $25/month get access to our interactive maps, charts and hearing calendar so they dont miss any developments.Learn more about our marijuana bill tracker and become a supporter on Patreon to get access.

Even if a legalization bill did make it out of the conservative legislature, it would likely face resistance from Gov. Eric Holcomb (R), who said earlier this year that he cant support the reform as long as it remains federally prohibited.

That said, hes expressed support for expanding marijuana research and some level of openness to simple decriminalization.

Moed said that Democrats would continue to work to advance marijuana reform, and hed support having a conversation about starting with decriminalization if Republicans were willing to take it up seriously.

I think those of us in the Democratic caucus, we believe we need to take action in some wayand were open, certainly, to whatever compromises and negotiating we have to do to get the ball move forward, he said. But we certainly just dont believe that people who are seeking medical relief or have very low amounts of cannabis product for whatever reason whether its mental health or veteransno one should be a criminal for doing that.

I think that this today was an effort to try to kind of give those people a voice in the legislature because its been stifled up to this point, he said. And, unfortunately, when put to a full vote, even a lot of people who said they were for it didnt take the vote.

Major Alcohol Association Executives Urge Industry To Support Efforts To Legalize Marijuana

Photo courtesy of Philip Steffan.

Read the original here:
Indiana Democrat Forces Marijuana Legalization Vote In House, But ... - Marijuana Moment

Legislative women’s caucus still divided only Democrats installed … – Maryland Matters

Del. Edith J. Patterson (D-Charles) is set to take over as president of the Women Legislators of Maryland caucus after the legislative session ends. Photo by Danielle E. Gaines.

When Del. Lesley J. Lopez (D-Montgomery), outgoing president of the Women Legislators of Maryland, rises on the House floor Friday to announce the new line-up of the womens caucus executive board, the list will, for the second year in a row, contain only Democrats.

Last year, in an acrimonious split, the caucus elected Lopez as its leader even though informal caucus rules dictated that a Republican, Harford County Del. Lauren Arikan, was next in line. Democrats said they were uncomfortable elevating a vocal conservative like Arikan with an acerbic rhetorical style to the top job of the traditionally bipartisan caucus, even though she had promised to keep partisan politics out of caucus deliberations. All 11 Republican women in the General Assembly at the time resigned in protest.

Del. Lelsey Lopez (D-Montgomery) outlines priorities of the Womens Caucus during the 2023 General Assembly session. Photo by Danielle E. Gaines.

Lopez quickly vowed to try to heal the wounds, and even sent handwritten notes to each of the Republican women in the legislature, but did not encounter much success. A few Republicans have attended some caucus events over the past year and dont make a big production of it, Lopez said. These included a Womens History Month breakfast with Gov. Wes Moore (D) at Government House last month.But no Republican has paid the $150 annual membership dues, so they werent eligible to vote this week in the caucus leadership elections, she said.

More significantly, Republicans and Democrats say, women lawmakers seem unable to come together at the moment and suggest the fissures may be more than just ideological.The legislature currently has 72 Democratic women and just eight Republican women.

I think this has been the most dramatic thing that Ive experienced in my time here, and thats saying something, said Del. Rachel Muoz (R-Anne Arundel), who joined the House in late 2021. I think there are some long-term grudges and theresbias and theres a lack of trust. So the two sides are unable to come together and even have a conversation. And its sad.

In an apparent effort to heal wounds, Muoz was nominated for a position on the womens caucus executive board, at the suggestion of Del. Shaneka Henson (D-Anne Arundel), who represents a nearby district and has an adjoining office in the Lowe House Office Building. Lopez and other Democrats then encouraged Muozto seek the position.

I saw it as sort of an olive branch and perhaps an opportunity, Muoz said.

But when the lawmaker checked in with her Republican colleagues, they advised her not to seek the slot. She reluctantly complied.

Rachel Muoz. Campaign photo.

Its a very sensitive topic and people are highly charged, Muoz said.

Lopez said she didnt understand why some Republican women were pressuring their colleagues to avoid participating in the caucus, especially when conservative Republicans lost many of their races in Maryland last year and when the next election is so far off.

Were four years away from the Republican primary, Lopez said. The extremists who ran in the [last] primary, like [GOP gubernatorial nominee] Dan Cox, didnt win.

The Women Legislators of Maryland is a 51-year-old organization the oldest womens caucus in any state legislature and has traditionally been bipartisan, though it has been dominated by Democrats given the partisan lean of the state and the General Assembly.

Usually in the womens caucus, board members have worked their way up the leadership ladder and for the past several years, the group has informally agreed that a Republican could serve as president every three years though thats not written in stone. Still, when the caucus last year bypassed Arikan, who had been elected vice president in 2021, in favor of Lopez, who was first vice president and by tradition would not have been expected to take over until this year, Republicans were incensed.

It was a lot over the years, said Del. Teresa E. Reilly (R-Harford). We asked for certain things and they never came about. It all just came to a head.

Del. Kathy Szeliga (R-Baltimore County), a leading conservative and close ally of Arikans, said theres no reason for Republicans to rejoin the caucus and that GOP members have occasionally discussed setting up their own.

The process was so disrespectful last year and the agenda is very partisan, she said.

Del. April Rose (R-Carroll) said she makes womens issues a priority in her legislative work but also did not see value in re-engaging with the womens caucus.

We fight over a lot of issues already on the [House] floor, so I dont feel the need to fight it out in the caucus, she said.

With an all-Democratic membership, the womens caucus advanced a notably progressive agenda for this legislative session a dramatic contrast to many years when women lawmakers came together publicly over family law, workplace and health issues but tended to avoid more politically divisive matters like abortion rights. This year, the caucus leaned into abortion rights, an issue that became magnified after the U.S. Supreme Court struck down decades-old abortion protections in the 1973 Roe v. Wade case.

Abortion has been considered settled law in Maryland since voters overwhelmingly approved a ballot measure preserving reproductive rights in state law in 1992, but the erosion of federal abortion protections compelled many state lawmakers to work to make the laws even stronger here and to offer protections to women from out of state who seek abortions in Maryland.

Several Democratic women said theyve detected more belligerence and name-calling from their GOP colleagues this year over abortion and a raft of other issues not just during legislative debates but on social media posts.

There may be no more branches left on the olive tree, Lopez said.

Now, the Maryland Republican Party is getting in on the act. The state GOP released a statement Thursday from Chair Nicole Beus Harris and two other Republican leaders accusing the Maryland House of turning its month-long Womens History Month celebration into Democrat Womens History Month.

When the Maryland House of Delegates is in session in March, a female delegate highlights a notable woman at the end of each session. It is a lovely tradition. But we were disappointed to learn that the Maryland House of Delegates did not ask even one Republican woman to participate last month! Harris, Republican National Committeewoman Nicolee Ambrose and former state chair Diana Waterman wrote in the statement.

They went on to blast what they characterized as Democratic womens extreme agenda and called excluding Republicans from Womens History Month speeches in the House a new low (Szeliga did in fact offer a tribute on the House floor to Ellen R. Sauerbrey, the former House minority leader and two-time GOP nominee for governor, and received warm bipartisan applause for her speech, even though she had not been invited by House leaders to speak).

With all due respect, please change the name of the Womens Caucus to the Maryland Democrat Womens Legislative Caucus, Harris, Ambrose and Waterman concluded.

The caucus going forward: Its a wait and see situation

Its obvious that as centrists depart the legislature, as the Democratic caucuses in the House and Senate move to the left while the Republican caucuses move to the right, the same trends are evident among women lawmakers in their respective parties.

Weve had wonderful relationships [across party lines] in the past, said Del. Edith J. Patterson (D-Charles), who is set to take over as womens caucus president from Lopez after the legislative session ends.

Besides Patterson, the new womens caucus leadership roster that will be announced Friday features Del. Nicole A. Williams (D-Prince Georges) as vice president, Del. Dana Jones (D-Anne Arundel) as first vice president, Del. Michele Guyton (D-Baltimore County) as second vice president, Del. Brooke Grossman (D-Washington) as secretary, and Dels. Jennifer White (D-Baltimore County) and Linda Foley (D-Montgomery) as at-large board members.

The caucus is also changing its bylaws, so that board members wont automatically advance up the leadership ladder. In other words, its no longer assumed that Williams will take over in 2024.

For her part, Patterson said she absolutely believes Republicans and Democrats can find harmony in the womens caucus.

It will take a decision of Republican women, she said. Its a wait and see situation.

Bryan P. Sears contributed to this report.

Visit link:
Legislative women's caucus still divided only Democrats installed ... - Maryland Matters