Archive for the ‘Democrat’ Category

Vulnerable Democrats anxious over stalled Covid-19 talks – Politico

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi rejected the idea of lowering her partys demands, reiterating that Democrats needed to stand behind their more sweeping legislation as the pandemic rages on. | Alex Wong/Getty Images

Moderate House Democrats are growing increasingly alarmed about stalled coronavirus relief negotiations, with vulnerable members starting to privately push Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other party leaders to take action to break the stalemate.

Those anxieties particularly among the Democrats in GOP-leaning districts known as frontliners have spiked as lawmakers watched the standoff drag out in the Senate this week while they were stuck back home in their districts amid the pandemic. The Senate on Thursday failed to advance a skinny Republican coronavirus relief plan over Democratic opposition, leaving senators in both parties to declare negotiations likely on ice until after the election.

Advertisement

Now House members are preparing to return to Washington next week with little prospects for a bipartisan deal, even as coronavirus cases continue to rise and millions of Americans remain unemployed. The House is scheduled to be in session for just three weeks before leaving town until November. But on Thursday, Pelosi dismissed suggestions to change strategies.

We dont want to go home without a bill, but dont be a cheap date, Pelosi said on a private caucus call. When you are in a negotiation, the last place to get weak knees is at the end.

Some Democrats have suggested passing smaller, more targeted coronavirus relief bills in the House, which many hope would stand a chance in the Senate or at least restart talks. But Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer have rejected that idea, saying it weakens Democrats efforts to secure a broader relief package.

Schumer also joined the private call Thursday afternoon and tried to reassure nervous House Democrats after the failed Senate vote. Schumer said he was confident the talks werent finished noting that Republicans have relented in past coronavirus negotiations and would feel pressure to act before the election, though GOP leaders have expressed skepticism of any deal before November. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, the top administration negotiator, also signaled his lower expectations in comments to reporters Wednesday.

I think they will come back again, Schumer said of the White House, according to three Democratic sources on the call. The weaker they are, the better off we are. And that means the more heat they get and the more that Mnuchin is able to persuade Trump, that if he doesn't get something done here, it's going to be certain that he won't be reelected.

On the call, House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer raised the idea of passing another coronavirus relief bill in the House, something several Democrats have privately pushed in recent weeks; theyve argued it's better than heading into the final weeks before the election without doing anything further. But Schumer shot that idea down.

We have to wait for them to come to us, if they dont come to us we will not get something your caucus can support, Schumer said, according to multiple Democrats on the call.

But some House Democrats arent convinced the wait-it-out strategy will work and have started to press leadership to take some kind of action, including potentially putting bills dealing with specific aspects of coronavirus relief on the floor so that lawmakers have something to tout to their constituents back home.

Those Democrats argue that the $3.4 trillion coronavirus relief bill the House passed in May, known as the HEROES Act, is fading from the publics memory and the House needs to do something now to show lawmakers are taking action despite the Senate stalemate.

The currency of that vote is eroding, Rep. Derek Kilmer (D-Wash.), chair of the moderate New Democrat Coalition, argued on the caucus call Thursday, according to multiple sources. Hoyer raises a legitimate question whether were willing to adjourn in October with the understanding that help may not come ... We want the American people that are hurting the most to know that we are fighting for them.

Kilmer was among several centrist Democrats who voiced similar concerns about the inaction one day earlier in a call with Pelosi. Some, particularly freshmen, pressed for more votes on coronavirus legislation, such as piecemeal bills to address programs like unemployment insurance, small business assistance or stimulus checks.

Pelosi rejected the idea of lowering their partys demands both on Wednesday and during the broader caucus call Thursday, reiterating that Democrats needed to stand behind their more sweeping legislation as the pandemic rages on.

Members range in suggestions to voting on Heroes again to hanging tough, Pelosi said Thursday, according to Democrats on the call. Most of you agree that if we hang tough, we will get a better bill.

One idea Pelosi is considering, however, is a floor vote on a standalone bill from House Energy and Commerce Chair Frank Pallone that would provide $75 billion to strengthen coronavirus testing and tracing programs nationwide. Senate Republicans proposed $16 billion for testing and tracing in their bill this week.

Other swing-district Democrats say theyre begun to search for more options themselves. Members of the Problem Solvers Caucus have begun drafting a bipartisan proposal to amp up pressure on their partys leaders to accept something that falls in between the two parties' demands, possibly around $2 trillion. The GOP bill filibustered in the Senate Thursday amounted to roughly $500 billion.

Some members of the bipartisan group have even reached out to the White House about their plan. But senior Democrats say theyre skeptical that it could make either party budge.

"Were doing everything we can to get both sides back to the table," said Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.), a co-leader of the group along with Rep. Tom Reed (R-N.Y.). "We cant wait until January."

The calls for Democratic leaders to put more coronavirus bills on the floor have been growing for weeks. When the House returned in August to vote on a rescue package for the U.S. Postal Service, several Democrats urged Pelosi to couple that vote with one on broader economic recovery legislation. Pelosi and her team ultimately decided against any additional votes.

Concerns about the inaction have only escalated since then, with party leaders making no progress in negotiations and ultimately halting talks altogether. Pelosi and GOP officials havent met in person since early last month and a call between the speaker and Mnuchin last week yielded no results.

Rep. John Yarmuth (D-Ky.), who chairs the House Budget Committee, said he has personally urged party leaders to take up a bill that deals with the most immediate needs, such as jobless benefits, small business loans or nutritional assistance, rather than holding out for one huge package as the GOP refuses to move.

"I think most Americans right now look at it and say, these people are just pathetic. They can't come together when people are suffering and they can't come together on a reasonable package," Yarmuth said, referring to the public perception of Washington as a whole. "So I think showing that we're reasonable would be important. I'd like to see us do it before we break for the campaign next month."

At the same time, Democratic leadership is battling discontent on another front a bill slated for a vote in the coming weeks that would legalize marijuana at the federal level.

Vulnerable House Democrats are furious about plans to vote in roughly two weeks on the bill, which they believe would fuel a barrage of GOP attack ads in the final weeks before the election despite being widely praised as a step toward racial justice.

A majority of Americans favor legalization. But some Democrats, particularly freshmen, have been spooked by recent polling that showed that Trumps law and order attacks had already been taking some toll, with voters particularly in the suburbs uneasy about calls to defund the police amid nationwide protests.

Others worried that Democrats would head into the election with their chief message being about marijuana and the rest of their agenda drowned out by Trump, particularly if they leave for recess without a coronavirus relief deal.

We cant fund the government, we cant fix Covid, but yet we can pass weed, said one Democratic aide, summing up the frontliners anxieties.

The bill which would also create grant programs for people hit especially hard by the war on drugs initially saw more support within the caucus. But several swing-district Democrats say their thinking changed after weeks of protests, some of which turned violent, and growing calls to defund the police.

A whip count by Democratic leaders this week showed some faltering support, and there has been some early talk among senior Democrats of pulling the bill from the floor schedule.

Caitlin Emma contributed to this story.

Read the rest here:
Vulnerable Democrats anxious over stalled Covid-19 talks - Politico

Varney: Democrats rush to aid the wealthy – Fox Business

FOX Business Stuart Varney argues Democrats are desperate to bail-out their wealthy supporters.

The Democrats are moving heaven and earth to help the rich. You heard right, the Democrats are running to the assistance of the top 1%. This tells you a lot about political change.

If you thought the Democrats were all about "working people,"think again. Maybe the socialist wing wants to seize wealth, but the establishment is desperate to bail out their wealthy supporters.

VARNEY CLAIMS DEMS ARE RUNNING 'BIDEN-HARRIS-SANDERS' SOCIALIST TICKET THAT PUTS YOUR MONEY AT RISK

Specifically, they want to bring back the deduction for state taxes. Yes, thats the salt issue. Its the big sticking point in the fight over a new virus aid package.

Back in the good old days, before Donald Trump, wealthy people could claim a deduction for the state taxes they paid. Fork out, say, $100,000 to New Jersey, New York, Illinois or California, and that $100,000 comes off your federal tax return. Its a Major Leaguededuction. It was a big tax saving. But thatsthe old days.

Now, no deduction -- and the wealthy, especially in high-tax, Democrat states, are complaining bitterly. They're paying more federal tax, not less!

DEMOCRATS OFFER 'FRIGHTENING PROPOSITION' FOR US ECONOMY, SAYS CHARLES PAYNE

Desperation!

New York Sen.Chuck Schumer is demanding a SALTrepeal.

So is House SpeakerNancy Pelosi from California.

So is presidential candidate Joe Biden.

The establishment is desperate to avoid even higher taxes in already high-tax, Democratic states, which would make things even worse.

But, if SALT were to be repealed, the establishment helps its rich donors. It would be a Democratic gift to the wealthy. The main beneficiaries would be one-percenters. Forget ideology. Political self-interest rules the Democratic elites.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

Adapted from Stuart Varney's "My Take"monologue on "Varney & Co." on Sept. 10, 2020.

See the rest here:
Varney: Democrats rush to aid the wealthy - Fox Business

Democrats Hold Secret Edge If Election Is Too Close to Call – Bloomberg

Twenty years ago, as Democrat Al Gore and Republican George W. Bush battled for weeks over whod won the U.S. presidential election, Floridas Republican secretary of state, Katherine Harris, helped hand the White House to Bush by declaring an end to recounts that showed him clinging to the slimmest of leads.

If the outcome of Novembers election comes down to fights over counting mail-in ballots and claims of fraud by President Donald Trump, Democrat Joe Biden may have a quiet advantage: the top election officials in many of the key states that could decide the election are Democrats.

Katherine Harris announces the certification of presidential ballots on Nov. 26, 2000.

Photographer: Peter Muhlay/AFP via Getty Images

In Michigan and Pennsylvania -- two Democratic-leaning states Trump won in 2016 -- the top elections officials belong to Bidens party. Thats also true in Arizona, which Trump carried but Biden is now leading in the polls, and Minnesota, which the president has targeted as a potential pickup.

Trump, who trails Biden in national polls, has tried to undermine the publics confidence in the election. He falsely claims that mail-in ballots are rife with fraud, and that the election will be rigged against him. This has led Democrats to worry about a scenario where Trump is ahead in the election-night count from in-person voters and declares himself the winner before all outstanding mail-in ballots are tallied.

More from Election

Should that happen, it will be up to the secretaries of state to preside over the counting of mail-in votes and certify the final outcomes, a process that could take days or even weeks. These relatively anonymous state officials could prove a bulwark for Biden as they cope with whats expected to be an unprecedented surge in mail-in ballots because of the coronavirus pandemic.

They will also be on the front lines in countering any claims by Trump or his allies that the election is somehow rigged.

It will be all hands on deck, but defending election results will definitely start with secretaries of state as the chief election officer, said Alex Padilla, a Democrat who was elected to serve as Californias secretary of state. In my mind, its definitely good that we have secretaries in swing states committed to strengthening and defending the voting system.

Election officials insist that theyre non-partisan and oversee voting according to the law. But J. Kenneth Blackwell, a former Ohio secretary of state, said its impossible to avoid politics when elections officials have to make tough decisions.

Why the U.S. Mail Is 2020 Presidential Campaign Issue: QuickTake

Blackwell was in charge of Ohios voting in 2004, when Democrat John Kerry delayed conceding to Bush until the morning after Election Day because of outstanding provisional ballots.

You cant take politics out of politics, said Blackwell, now a member of the Trump campaigns board of advisers. Its the way our system is set up. I dont all of a sudden become a non-Republican when I have to make a judgment associated with my job in the political sphere.

Karen Brinson Bell, executive director of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, tangled with Trump just this week. Brinson, who was appointed by a Democratic-controlled board, on Thursday warned voters that it is illegal to vote twice in an election after Trump encouraged people who mail in their ballots for the November election to also go to the polls on Election Day.

These mail-in ballots are a disgrace and they know it, Trump told supporters at a campaign rally in Pennsylvania on Thursday evening, speaking about Democrats and suggesting they could manipulate mail-in voting. The only way theyre going to beat us is by doing that kind of stuff.

Trump Call for Voting Twice Sparks Warning From State Official

The Democratic secretary of state in Pennsylvania, Kathy Boockvar, said in a statement that she has confidence county elections officials will count ballots efficiently to make sure the outcome of the election is known as quickly as possible.

While state officials influence the election with the rules governing voting, they also can play a pivotal role in ballot-counting if the race is close, with rulings to break tie votes or other actions such as Harris took in 2000, said Daniel Tokaji, a former Ohio State University election law professor and now dean of the University of Wisconsin Law School. Theres also inherent tension between discharging their official duties and the incentive to help their party, he said.

Theres just no getting around that conflict of interest, Tokaji added. Even well-intentioned officials trying to do the right thing, their actions can always be called into question.

But Charles Stewart III, a professor and elections scholar at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, said if the race does go into overtime, the courts likely would play the more decisive role. He cited changes made to ballot-counting processes after the Florida 2000 recount chaos that gave secretaries of state less discretion.

Earlier: Facebook, Twitter Flag Trump for Misleading Posts on Voting

Asked whether Trumps campaign is concerned about Democrats being in charge of overseeing post-election counting in some states, spokeswoman Thea McDonald focused instead on efforts to expand mail-in voting. Rather than trying to predict the future, the news media ought to draw attention to Democrats nonstop attempts to throw our electoral system into chaos 60 days before a general election, she said.

The Biden campaign declined to comment.

Election officials say that while television networks and news wires typically declare winners on Election Night, thats based on an unofficial count that doesnt become official until days or weeks later -- after outstanding ballots are counted and theres a canvass to determine final tallies with any recounts. The inability to declare an unofficial winner on Election Night isnt a sign of problems, they say.

But the possibility of delayed results this year is real, said Maria Benson, spokeswoman for the National Association of Secretaries of State, and we ask all voters and the media to be patient.

Current laws in states including Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin dont allow mail-ballots to be processed until Election Day, meaning they may not all be counted by the end of the night. Certain other states, including Ohio, allow ballots received after the election to be counted as long as they are postmarked earlier.

In a year when voter turnout is expected to be high, first-time voters and those going to the wrong polling place will lead to more provisional ballots, which are held until voter eligibility is determined, said Michael Morley, an assistant law professor at Florida State University whos worked on election emergencies and post-election litigation.

Democratic Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson said on CNNs Inside Politics on Sunday that if the state legislature doesnt change the law to allow early processing of mail-in ballots, it may take until the Friday evening after the election to get full results -- and if thats the case, shell be emphasizing that until every vote is counted, it wont be possible to say who won any race.

Benson said it will also be critical for election officials to be transparent about whats happening with the ballot-counting process, and depend on data and facts to combat any misinformation that undermines public confidence in the accuracy of the results.

Its going to be really important for every secretary of state this year, as we seek to cut through lots of different rhetoric thats going to only be increasing in the weeks coming up to Election Day and beyond, Benson said in a separate appearance on NBCs Meet the Press.

Washingtons Republican secretary of state, Kim Wyman, said her colleagues should be prepared to manage a legal crisis that could determine the outcome of the 2020 presidential election.

This will have shades of 20 years ago during Bush v. Gore, said Wyman, whos running for re-election herself. I hope my colleagues and I will be able to present the facts to voters in our own states and the facts will prevail. That has been a challenge in 2020.

(Updates with Benson comments from 23nd paragraph.)

Before it's here, it's on the Bloomberg Terminal.

Read this article:
Democrats Hold Secret Edge If Election Is Too Close to Call - Bloomberg

Democrat Biden adds former rival Buttigieg, ex-Obama officials to transition team – Reuters

FILE PHOTO: Former Democratic presidential candidate Pete Buttigieg endorses former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden's campaign at Chicken Scratch in Dallas, Texas, U.S., March 2, 2020. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Joe Bidens presidential campaign on Saturday added former Democratic primary rival Pete Buttigieg, along with senior officials who served under President Barack Obama, to an expanded White House transition team.

Biden added four new co-chairs to the team led by his longtime ally Ted Kaufman: New Mexico Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham, former Obama economic adviser Jeffrey Zients, Louisiana Representative Cedric Richmond and his campaign adviser Anita Dunn.

He also named Buttigieg, a military veteran and former mayor of South Bend, Indiana, to the advisory board, together with former deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, and Susan Rice, national security adviser to Obama who was on the shortlist to be Bidens running mate.

We are preparing for this transition amid the backdrop of a global health crisis and struggling economy, Kaufman said. This is a transition like no other, and the team being assembled will help Joe Biden meet the urgent challenges facing our country on day one.

Kaufman said the expertise of advisory board members will help Biden respond to the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, which continues to ravage the United States, and the economic recession.

Former Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, who has been advising Biden on the pandemic response, has also joined the transition team.

Zients was tasked with taking over after the botched rollout of the Obamacare enrollment website in 2013. Lujan Grisham has a background in health and aging and has led her states coronavirus response.

Other new transition team members include Teresa Romero,president of the United Farm Workers, Lonnie Stephenson, president of the International Brotherhood of Electric Workers and Tony Allen, president of the historically black Delaware State University.

Reporting by Valerie Volcovici; Editing by Tom Brown

More:
Democrat Biden adds former rival Buttigieg, ex-Obama officials to transition team - Reuters

Progressive gains in the Democratic primary raise the prospect of a Senate leadership battle – The Boston Globe

If the vote total trend holds up when all mail ballots are counted, Ruggerio could be weakened by a poorer-than-expected showing. When the polls closed Tuesday, he was leading with 54 percent of the in-person vote over Leonardo A. Cioe Jr.

I think that even if Ruggerio hangs on, we need a new Senate president," Bell said. "The people of Rhode Island have spoken. Voters last night sent a clear rejection of the extreme conservatism of Senator Ruggerio and the right-wing machine that has dominated state politics for far too long.

Bell has long been critical of Ruggerio and other Senate leaders, saying they are too conservative on issues such as gun control, abortion, and tax cuts for the rich.

Ruggerio, a North Providence Democratic, has been Senate president since 2017; before that, he was Senate majority leader.

The Ruggerio camp shrugged off any suggestions that his tenure as Senate president could be at risk. Senator Bell is entitled to take any position he wants," said spokesman Bill Fischer, but Senator Ruggerio has faith and trust in his colleagues that they will be returning him to the position of Senate president.

The Senate contains 38 members, including 33 Democrats and five Republicans. So 17 votes are needed to elect the leader of the Democratic majority.

Definitions vary of which Democrats are considered liberals, and any calculus of progressive power will hinge on the mail ballot count. The Board of Elections does not expect to announce final results until Thursday.

But with vote totals updated on Wednesday with emergency ballots cast, several candidates backed by progressive groups such the Rhode Island Political Cooperative and the Working Families Party were leading.

For example, with seven of eight precincts reporting in Senate District 6 in Providence, progressive Tiara T. Mack led with 59 percent of the vote over Senator Harold M. Metts, who had 41 percent.

With all precincts reporting in Senate District 16 in Central Falls, progressive City Councilman Jonathon Acosta led with 48 percent of the vote over incumbent Senator Elizabeth A. Crowley, with 40 percent, and Leslie Estrada, with 12 percent.

With all precincts reporting in Senate District 18 in East Providence, progressive Cynthia Mendes led with 68 percent of the vote over incumbent Senate Finance Chairman William J. Conley Jr., who had 31.5 percent.

And with all precincts reporting in Senate District 30 in Warwick, Jeanine Calkin, a co-founder of the Rhode Island Political Cooperative, held an 35-vote lead over incumbent Senator Mark P. McKenney 617 to 582.

The general election also will play a role in determining the number of liberal senators. For example, Democrat Jennifer C. Douglas, who is backed by the Rhode Island Political Cooperative, is challenging Senator Elaine J. Morgan, a Hopkinton Republican, for the Senate District 34 seat.

But the idea of a progressive Senate leadership team is far from a certainty.

For one thing, it remains unclear who progressives would put forward as their choice for Senate president. The current leadership team will have open slots to lead key committees. And it remains unclear if Democrats would join with Republicans to fend off progressives in a leadership battle.

Senator Gayle L. Goldin, a Providence Democrat who is one of the longest-serving progressives in the Senate, did not address questions about a possible leadership battle directly.

But, she said, one of my biggest takeaways from last night is that even in the pandemic, with so many concerns with being in crowds, people came out to vote, and they voted for progressives. What we have seen is a strong message from the voters of Rhode Island that progressive issues resonate with them.

Goldin who sponsored the bill that passed last year to protect abortion rights in Rhode Island in case the U.S. Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade said the newly formed Rhode Island Democratic Womens Caucus supported Senate and House candidates in Tuesdays primaries, and women could soon make up a majority of the Senate.

That would be historic, not only for our state but the entire country, she said, noting that women make up a majority of the legislature in just one state (Nevada) and the majority of the House chamber in Colorado.

Goldin said the vote results also reflect a desire for legislative leaders to govern in a transparent way, even during the pandemic. The legislature should be doing more to vote on matters both related and unrelated to the pandemic, and that can be done remotely, providing needed transparency and public engagement, she said.

It is a progressive wave, Goldin said, and its a wave that is against politics as usual.

Some progressive candidates also received support from groups such as Reclaim RI, the Democratic Socialists of America, and the Rhode Island Coalition Against Gun Violence.

The Rhode Island Political Cooperative backed 10 Senate candidates and seven House candidates. Calkin said one of the groups goals was to give progressives a governing majority in one chamber, so it focused on the 38-member Senate rather than the 75-member House.

So does Calkin expect a Senate leadership battle? I think we will get a better idea after all the votes are counted, she said. But yes, I believe so.

Edward Fitzpatrick can be reached at edward.fitzpatrick@globe.com. Follow him on Twitter @FitzProv.

See original here:
Progressive gains in the Democratic primary raise the prospect of a Senate leadership battle - The Boston Globe