Archive for the ‘Democrat’ Category

Democrat thanks Fox News’ Shepard Smith for ‘telling the truth’ – Washington Examiner

Democratic Rep. Ted Lieu thanked Fox News anchor Shepard Smith for "telling the truth" after he complained about the "deception" coming from Donald Trump Jr. and his allies about the meeting he had with a Russian lawyer last year who had promised damaging information about Hillary Clinton.

Lieu, who hails from California and has become one of the most vocal Twitter trolls of the Trump administration, also took a shot at those who defend the president by attacking what they view as "liberal propaganda."

"More liberal propaganda against @realDonaldTrump. Oh wait, this is from Shepard Smith w/ @FoxNews. Thank you Shepard for telling the truth," Lieu tweeted Saturday morning.

On Friday, Smith seemed to catch his Fox News colleague Chris Wallace off guard when he said it was "mind-boggling" that Trump Jr.'s description of the meeting, amended multiple times as more details about it are reported, has fraught with "lies."

"Why is it lie after lie after lie? If you're clean, come on clean," he said.

Read the original here:
Democrat thanks Fox News' Shepard Smith for 'telling the truth' - Washington Examiner

Do Democrats in the Massachusetts Legislature need to be more progressive? – The Boston Globe

YES

Keri Thompson

Cohasset resident; senior lecturer at Emerson College; 2016 United Independent Party candidate for state representative

handout

Keri Thompson.

As someone who was a dedicated Massachusetts Democrat for more than 10 years, I understand the frustration many voters have with the Democratic Party and Massachusetts politics overall. I became a registered independent almost a year ago because I got tired of waking up every morning not knowing what the Democratic Party stood for anymore.

For Democrats to survive and thrive -- in our state and nationally -- the party urgently needs to embrace a progressive agenda that is both necessary and popular. Voters are craving progressive and bold leadership, and we rarely see anything progressive or bold coming out of Beacon Hill.

Advertisement

Our states bright shade of blue on electoral maps is deceiving because we still dont have a progressive Legislature even with an overwhelmingly veto-proof majority in both branches. The solidly progressive Democratic Party platform gets ignored year after year. For the place that invented America, we have become very good at upholding the status quo. But the status quo is stagnant and uninspiring and fails to tackle the major issues of our time.

If Massachusetts wants to remain one of the nations strongest states, going left is the only option. Non-progressive Democrats claim moderation and pragmatism are key to legislative compromise and getting things accomplished. But most of these accomplishments arent helping anyone. Voters struggle nowadays to find any contrast between our Republican governor and our Democratic Legislature.

Get Today's Headlines in your inbox:

The day's top stories delivered every morning

Our problems demand brave and creative solutions. We need to make voting easier and more convenient. We need a serious discussion about poverty and income inequality. Housing is getting less affordable. We need a $15 minimum wage. We need to protect our public schools while decreasing emphasis on high-stakes testing. We need to make higher education affordable. We need a fairer criminal justice system and sensible drug laws. We need cutting-edge environmental protection, immigration reform, paid family leave, and real single-payer health care. And we especially need campaign finance reform and legislative term limits -- especially for the House Speaker.

My plea to Massachusetts Democrats: Fight harder for progressive ideas. Start rocking the boat. Make voters like me walk into my town hall and proudly register as a Democrat again.

NO

Mark Linde

Ward 1 chairman, Brockton Democratic City Committee; Brockton representative to Southeastern Regional Vocational School District Committee

handout

Mark Linde.

For 37 years I have been a registered Democrat. I followed my dads lead when I registered to vote. Then presidential candidate Jimmy Carter spoke to our class at Brockton High School in 1975 and inspired me to get involved and volunteer extensively on many Democratic campaigns.

Advertisement

I am one of the two Brockton representatives to the Southeastern Regional Vocational School District Committee, elected every four years in a non-partisan election. I believe there is no place in local races for partisan politics even though I am a committed Democrat.

In the same spirit, our state elected officials should try to limit partisan differences. Yes, legislators run under party labels, but their responsibility is to work together to solve problems. That means avoiding extremes and seeking common ground.

I will admit on issues like charter schools, which I oppose, our Democratic Party is on the right side. But we need to resist calls for Democratic lawmakers to abandon the political center and move leftward. Both the party and the state would be better off if they instead continued working with their Republican colleagues on policies that can command broad public support.

It has become very unfashionable to be a fiscal moderate, a centrist, or conservative Democrat. Our Democratic Party has moved left and the Republican Party has moved right. Remember when there were liberal Republicans like former governor William F. Weld and conservative Democrats like former governor Edward King? Honestly, one of the most liberal Democrats, the late US Senator Edward M. Kennedy, knew that to make things work he had to work with both sides.

I believe that President John F. Kennedy might not be welcome in the Democratic Party today because his views might not be viewed as progressive enough. President Bill Clintons positions angered some progressives.

On social issues I find myself more progressive on some and less on others. What I find ironic is that I am labeled as just plain wrong by many progressives if I take a different view from them. In the age of Donald Trump, my question is more important than ever. Why cant we all just get along and work together for the common good?

Last weeks Argument: Should out-of-state drivers licenses be an acceptable form of identification for buying alcohol in Massachusetts?

Yes: 96 percent (117 votes)

No: 4 percent (5 votes)

Read this article:
Do Democrats in the Massachusetts Legislature need to be more progressive? - The Boston Globe

Maine Democrat kicked off committees over ‘inexcusable’ anti-Trump rant – Washington Times

A Maine state lawmaker who is being investigated by the U.S. Secret Service over a threatening online comment about President Trump has been removed from two legislative committees as punishment, the states House speaker announced Friday.

Democratic Rep. Scott Hamann has been kicked off the Health and Human Services Committee and the Marijuana Legalization Implementation Committee, House Speaker Sara Gideon said, the Bangor Daily News reported.

The punishment came three days after Mr. Hamann called President Trump a joke, a rapist, a racist and a liar in a lengthy Facebook rant that concluded with an apparent threat against the president.

Trump is a half term president, at most, especially if I ever get within 10 feet of that p, Mr. Hamann wrote.

He apologized a day later, saying he shouldnt have voiced his frustration by responding with the same vile language currently surrounding politics.

This is not language I typically use, it does not reflect my personal values, and while misguided, it was intended to make a visceral point about the devolving political discourse in America, Mr. Hamann said.

A representative of the U.S. Secret Service said it has opened an investigation into Mr. Hamanns statements.

In Fridays announcement, Ms. Gideon called Mr. Hamanns comments inexcusable and unacceptable.

I hope this consequence sends a clear signal to all members of the House of Representatives that they are expected to conduct themselves with respect at all times and in all media, she said, the Daily News reported.

See original here:
Maine Democrat kicked off committees over 'inexcusable' anti-Trump rant - Washington Times

Top Democrat leaving State House, putting future leadership in flux – The Boston Globe

Massachusetts Representative Brian S. Dempsey.

In an abrupt departure that could reorder Massachusetts politics, House budget chairman Brian S. Dempsey widely expected to be the chambers next leader is resigning and joining one of the states top lobbying firms in September.

His announcement turns what was anticipated to be an orderly transfer of power to succeed Speaker Robert A. DeLeo, when he eventually steps down, into a potential free-for-all over one of the states three most powerful political posts.

Advertisement

Dempseys sudden exit upends a hierarchy that has existed for years, injecting volatility into internal House dynamics. While rumors of Dempseys plan circulated Wednesday evening, members of DeLeos senior leadership team were unaware of them as late as Thursday morning.

Thats a major, unanticipated shake-up, said Representative Jay R. Kaufman, a Lexington Democrat, when told of the news by a reporter.

Get Fast Forward in your inbox:

Forget yesterday's news. Get what you need today in this early-morning email.

Dempsey is just the latest lawmaker to pass through Beacon Hills revolving door, where a well-worn path often leads to a more lucrative government affairs post seeking to influence the decisions of former colleagues.

Dempsey, who will serve as senior vice president and chief operating officer of ML Strategies, joins a steady exodus of top DeLeo deputies. The speaker will now have to select his third budget chief since winning the Houses top post in 2009.

Two years into his speakership, DeLeo demoted both his budget chairman and majority leader both roles viewed as stepping stones to the speakers chair.

Advertisement

In 2015, at DeLeos behest, the House overwhelmingly voted to get rid of term limits for the speaker, extending his reign indefinitely and obscuring when another representative would ascend.

In a telephone interview, Dempsey denied that DeLeos apparent intention to hang onto the gavel for a few more years factored into his decision to leave.

The speaker staying has never been a factor for me. Hes always had my full support for as long as he wants to stay, the chairman of the House Committee on Ways and Means said.

Speaking to reporters at the State House, DeLeo on Thursday praised Dempsey, called him a close and dear friend, and said he would be missed.

DeLeo did not directly answer a question about how much longer he plans to stay in his leadership role. But he said he is running for reelection next year.

Asked who would take the reins of the powerful budget-writing committee when Dempsey leaves, DeLeo said, That process will start now in earnest.

Already, the halls of the State House were buzzing with the names of potential Dempsey successors, including the committees current vice chair, Stephen Kulik of Worthington, and Representatives Alice Peisch of Wellesley, Thomas A. Golden Jr. of Lowell, Sarah K. Peake of Provincetown, Joseph F. Wagner of Chicopee, Michael J. Moran of Brighton, and Peter V. Kocot of Northampton.

DeLeos choice could shape the trajectory of the Legislature for years to come. He and Dempsey are often seen as ideologically aligned on the more conservative end of the Massachusetts Democratic spectrum. A more progressive choice would bring the House closer philosophically to the left-leaning Senate.

Dempseys announcement comes as lawmakers are gearing up to host their state legislative counterparts from across the country for a national conference next month.

Such occasions often permit ambitious members to wine and dine colleagues, and the vacuum created by Dempseys exit will only heighten the stakes for this years interactions.

Already Thursday, lawmakers were jockeying to exert influence over who would succeed Dempsey in the Houses insular power structure.

I believe now is the time for the Massachusetts Black and Latino Legislative Caucus, the Progressive Caucus, the Womens Caucus to be strong and united in our selection of the next speaker of the House, said Representative Russell E. Holmes, a Mattapan Democrat. We should not do this individually; we should do this together so our voices are heard.

The legislative advocacy community lobbyists had spent years cultivating relationships with Dempsey and his staff, working to get cash for their favored causes in the $40 billion state budget.

They had long labored with the expectation that he would ascend to the role of speaker. Now, they will compete against him for clients.

As the news broke Thursday, one lobbyist sent Dempsey an e-mail with the letter n, followed by several os nooooooo.

While DeLeo on Thursday praised Dempsey, several people familiar with the inner workings of the House said there had been conflict about scheduling during the Houses budget deliberations in April. In recent years, floor deliberations that once took a full workweek and featured extensive debate have been compressed.

This year, the House wrapped up budget week in two days. DeLeo, according to those familiar, had hoped to prolong the process.

ML Strategies chief executive Stephen P. Tocco said he had signaled to Dempsey some months ago that he would be interested in talking with him if and when the legislator decided to leave the House.

But I told him I cant talk to you about anything until you file with the ethics commission, Tocco said, referring to the state ethics law that requires such public disclosures and which Dempsey submitted Tuesday.

On Thursday, Dempsey said, I told the speaker on Monday that I was approached and that Id thought about it and that I was interested enough to go forward, file a disclosure, and have a conversation.

See the article here:
Top Democrat leaving State House, putting future leadership in flux - The Boston Globe

The Democrat who knows the tax code is a rotting carcass – The Denver Post

Alex Wong, Getty Images file

Cynics are said to be people who are prematurely disappointed about the future. Such dyspepsia is encouraged by watching Republicans struggle to move on from the dogs breakfast they have made of health care reform to the mares nest of tax reform. Concerning which, House Speaker Paul Ryan, whose preternatural optimism makes Candide seem morose, says: If were going to truly fix our tax code, then weve got to fix all of it. Trying to fix all of immigration in 2013 and health care in 2010 with comprehensive legislation left almost everyone irritable. Perhaps the third time is the charm. Sen. Ron Wyden is skeptical about fixing much this year, even given Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnells decision to limit the August recess.

The fourth-most senior Democrat and ranking minority member on the tax-writing Finance Committee, Wyden, 68, is usually relaxed but now is especially so, for two reasons. He was just elected to a fourth term. And for him and other Finance Committee Democrats, tax reform is, so far, an undemanding spectator sport. This was underscored last weekend when, as he was being driven from one Oregon town hall to another, he read a Wall Street Journal story headlined: GOP Tax Overhauls Fate Rests on Big Six Talks.

Five of the six were in an almost taunting photo provided to The Journal by Ryans office Ryan, McConnell, House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady, Senate Finance Committee Chairman Orrin Hatch and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin. The missing sixth person was National Economic Council Director Gary Cohn. No congressional Democrat is included. Evidently, Republicans plan to pass tax reform without Democratic votes, under reconciliation, which is inherently partisan 51 voteswillsuffice and limits debate to 20 hours. The 1986 reform, the gold standard of bipartisan tax legislation, was on the Senate floor for more than 100 hours spread over 20 days after seven days of hearings and 16 days of mark-up.

Ryan and McConnell say tax reformwillbe revenue neutral. This might require dynamic scoring calculating that reformed incentiveswillstimulate economic growth to project implausible growth rates. Plausibility is, however, optional, as it was in April, when Mnuchins department produced a tax plan that resembled Lincolns soup that was made by boiling the shadow of a pigeon that had starved to death. The document shorter than a drug store receipt, says Wyden was one page long, contained 218 words, eight numbers and a thumping vacuity, the promise to eliminate tax breaks for special interests.

Last November, Mnuchin told CNBC there would be no absolute tax cut for the upper class, meaning no net cut after lost deductions. In Mnuchins January confirmation hearing, Wyden mischievously suggested calling this the Mnuchin rule, which enthralled Mnuchin, who later said: I feel like Im now in good company with the Volcker rule and the Buffett rule. In a June hearing, however, Mnuchin told Wyden: You made it a rule, I didnt make it a rule. It would be entertaining to watch Republicans try to adhere to that rule while fulfilling their promise from which they began retreating on Tuesday to repeal the 3.8 percent Obamacare tax on investment income.

No Democrat, says Wyden, likes the status quo. When he recently described the tax code as a rotting economic carcass, his wife asked him to stop scaring the children. The complexity of the code, which is more than 4 million words, is why America has more people employed as tax preparers (1.2 million) than as police and firefighters. If tax compliance were an industry, it would be among the nations largest; it devours 6.1 billion hours annually, the equivalent of more than 3 million full-time workers.

Wyden knows he sounds like a one-song juke box when he keeps stressing wage growth, but he notes that last week the encouraging number of jobs created in June (222,000) was accompanied by discouraging wage growth (year-over-year, 2.5 percent, barely ahead of inflation). Many economists are puzzled that low unemployment (4.4 percent) is not forcing employers to bid up the price of labor. Wyden says he is puzzled by neither the cause (persistent slow growth, limping at around 2 percent) nor the cause of this cause insufficient money in middle-class paychecks to power an economy where 70 percent of the fuel comes from consumer spending. He favors, for example, doubling the earned income tax credit. He seems, however, to be pre-emptively, but not prematurely, disappointed about a legislative process thatwillfall somewhat short of fixing all of what ails the rotting carcass.

E-mail George F. Will at georgewill@washpost.com.

To send a letter to the editor about this article, submit online or check out our guidelines for how to submit by e-mail or mail.

Originally posted here:
The Democrat who knows the tax code is a rotting carcass - The Denver Post