Mediaboss Marketing

As Democrats reel from their devastating loss in Georgias special election, one has to wonder what is going on in the heads of Democratic Party leadership.

These days, it seems they do the opposite of what works. In a center-right country, they are moving further and further left. Looking at actions and motivations, we can examine what is really going on in the mind of a Democratic Party leader.

Here are five things Democratic leaders really believe:

1) Flooding new potential voters over the border is more important than the safety of Americans.

Allowing unfettered illegal immigration is dangerous for all involved, but the Democratic leadership doesnt care. As many as 5.7 million noncitizens may have voted in the 2008 election, according to a new report from the research organization Just Facts.

As the millions of illegal immigrants have anchor babies in the U.S., Democrats have a new generation of voters ready to elect them just a few election cycles from now. They are playing the long game.

The Democrat leadership salivates at the thought of millions of anchor babies coming of voting age to sweep their party back into power. Nancy Pelosis age may be in the triple digits by then, but it looks like she plans to stick around to see the fruits of her labor.

Also, the Democrat leadership doesnt care if terrorists cross our open borders. Any little people who die in a terror attack are just collateral damage. Its for the greater good the Democratic Party leaderships power and wealth.

2) Democratic leaders know more guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens equals less crime, but they want law abiding citizens gun rights suppressed anyway.

Again, the Democratic leadership is playing with the lives of Americans, but there is something much more important their money and power.

Demonizing Second Amendment supporters is a really great way for Democrats to fundraise, especially after a shooting. Democrats cant wait to find a TV camera after a shooting to politicize a tragedy.

Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe looked like a jackass as he politicized the attack on a GOP congressman by a rabid leftist Bernie supporter, but all he could see were dollar signs in his eyes when he heard news of a shooting.

What do women want? Find the answer in Gina Loudons best-selling co-authored blockbuster, What Women Really Want available at the WND Superstore

3) The Democratic leadership wants to keep you on a virtual plantation by giving you free stuff in exchange for your votes.

There are few things that tear a family apart more than Big Daddy government coming in to help, but, the Democratic leadership doesnt care. It gets votes and money and power.

In lower-income minority neighborhoods, there is no role for men. Men who were destined to be providers for their families now have no purpose in their lives as Big Daddy government has replaced them as head of the household.

The Democratic leadership loves fatherless homes that have to accept free stuff from the government to get by. They own them and their votes.

Men who have lost their purpose as providers turn to drugs. And who is the party of drug decriminalization? The Democratic Party, of course!

The Democratic leadership doesnt care that it has robbed millions of poor minority households of happiness and success. Its all worth it as long as these households keep voting for Democrats.

4) The Democratic leadership has become communist. Although, its hard to tell if they actually believe in communism in their hearts or if they merely tow the commie (a.k.a. progressive) line to please the coastal elites whose money keeps them elected.

Nancy Pelosi comes from the commune of San Francisco, and the wealthy commies there keep her in power.

Jon Ossoff received as much money from donors in the city of San Francisco as he did from the entire state of Georgia. This isnt a coincidence. Ossoff would have owed his seat to Pelosi, and he would have voted for her as speaker in exchange for that campaign cash.

Anyone who thinks Pelosi is going anywhere is mistaken. Most Democratic congressmen owe their election to Pelosi and the San Fran commie cash.

These days, Democrats sound like communists because much of their money flows from the leftist coastal communes. To keep the money flowing, they have to keep the commies happy.

5) The Democratic leadership doesnt care that you have a household to support. They would rather talk about Russia conspiracy theories than help advance an agenda that restores jobs, national security and your peace of mind.

Democrats predicted Armageddon if Donald Trump was elected president, and they must do whatever it takes to keep President Trump from creating any prosperity in America. Every American who prospers during the Trump presidency is a lost vote for Democrats.

The best-case scenario for Democrats is to cause the economy to tank while Republicans are in power.

Thats why they must create scandal after scandal. Thats why they push conspiracy theories about Russia collusion that make them sound crazy.

There is nothing off the table when it comes to stopping President Trumps pro-American agenda.

I appeared on Fox Business to give my thoughts on the out-of-touch Democratic Party.

The Democratic Party might appear to be discussing a change in leadership right now, but its not going to happen.

The Democratic leadership is in place because of the money it provides to candidates across the country. Elected Democrats in D.C. owe their seats to Sen. Chuck Schumer and Pelosi, who control the spigot of campaign money flowing from New York and California to Democratic candidates across the country.

And there is one thing way more important to elected Democrats than their constituents money.

What do women want? Find the answer in Gina Loudons best-selling co-authored blockbuster, What Women Really Want available at the WND Superstore

Here is the original post:
5 things a Democrat leader really believes - WND.com

Another prominent Democrat has come forward to voice concerns about allegations ex-Attorney General Loretta Lynch may have sought to keep a lid on last years Hillary Clintons email probe, with California Rep. Adam Schiff saying hes queasy at the thought.

Schiff, the top Democrat on the House intelligence committee, aired his concerns in an interview Sunday and said he wants to hear from Lynch personally.

I'd like to hear what Loretta Lynch's explanation for that is, either by having her come to the Hill or by having her speak publicly, he said.

The call significantly ups the pressure on Lynch, as the push to scrutinize her conduct in last years Clinton email investigation becomes more bipartisan.

LYNCH SHOULD TESTIFY, GRAHAM SAYS

The renewed attention stems from fired FBI Director James Comeys testimony earlier this month that Lynch had instructed him to describe the probe as a matter not an investigation. Comey said this confused him and cited that directive, along with Lynchs unusual tarmac meeting with former President Bill Clinton while the investigation was ongoing, in his decision to announce the FBIs findings on his own.

Comeys handling of the case later would be cited by the Trump administration in the decision to fire him, though speculation remains widespread over to what extent the probe of Russia meddling and possible collusion with the Trump campaign may have played.

Yet even as Democrats focus heavily on the Russia allegations, a handful of high-powered lawmakers like Schiff now want to hear from Lynch. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, told CNN earlier this month that Comeys charges gave her a queasy feeling.

Schiff said Sunday he agrees.

It does give me a queasy feeling as well, he told CNNs State of the Union. There may be a perfectly accurate explanation by Loretta Lynch about why she thought 'matter' was the appropriate term rather than 'investigation.' So I wouldn't assume James Comey's characterization is the last word on it even although though I'm sure it's accurate.

Asked if he would have Lynch come to the House intelligence panel, he said hes not sure thats part of the Russia probe.

But I would like to hear what her explanation for that was. But I certainly wouldn't want that to distract us from what we need to do to get to the bottom of the Russia allegations, he said.

The comments come after a bipartisan letter was sent last week to Lynch and others regarding allegations of political interference in the Clinton case.

The inquiry was prompted, in part, by a series of media reports raising questions about whether Lynch tried to stifle the investigation into former Secretary of State Clintons use of a private email server.

The reports come amidst numerous allegations of political inference in controversial and high-profile investigations spanning the current and previous administrations, Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley's office said in a statement.

Grassley, R-Iowa; Feinstein; Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., penned the letter.

The reports they cited were based on hacked documents whose authenticity has not been confirmed.This includes an AprilNew York Times articleabout a batch of hacked files obtained by the FBI, including one reportedly authored by a Democratic operative who voiced confidence Lynch would keep the Clinton probe from going too far.

Follow this link:
Another Dem 'queasy' over claim of Loretta Lynch meddling in Clinton case - Fox News

Common Dreams

Ire for Democrat Who Pulled Plug on California's Single-Payer Bill Common Dreams Advocates of the single-payer healthcare proposal which has been steadily advancing through the California legislature were voicing outrage and disappointment on Saturday after Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon, a Democrat, announced he was pulling ... and more »

Visit link:
Ire for Democrat Who Pulled Plug on California's Single-Payer Bill - Common Dreams

Democratic gubernatorial nominees Phil Murphy of New Jersey and Ralph Northam of Virginia are looking strong in 2017 general election campaigns. Photo: US Department of State; Commonwealth of Virginia

The frustrating pattern of near-misses for Democrats in 2017 special congressional elections was distorted and exaggerated by the Tweeter-in-Chief, who crowed:

I guess this means he thinks the special election in the 34th District of California, a virtually all-Democratic affair won by Democrat Jimmy Gomez, produced a GOP winner too. That election did end a full two weeks ago, so maybe the president has just forgotten it.

In any event, many Democrats are undoubtedly wondering when the impressive anti-Trump passions of 2017 will produce a win in a nationally significant and competitive contest. The two remaining scheduled special elections this year are not very promising for the Donkey Party. The first, in November (assuming a battle over control of the special election between the governor and legislature is resolved) is in dark-red Utah, in the district of Representative Jason Chaffetz (who is resigning at the end of this month), the 16th-most Republican House district in the country according to the Cook Political Report. There are 15 Republicans, as compared to four Democrats, who are running for the Chaffetz seat at this point.

In December (after primaries in August and party runoffs in September), Alabama will hold a special election to formally choose a successor to Attorney General Jeff Sessions (Republican Luther Strange at least temporarily holds the seat he was appointed to by disgraced former governor Robert Bentley, who resigned shortly after filling the seat). There is a lot of intrigue around the crowded GOP primary for this seat, and potentially some divisive intra-Republican activity, but no one at this point is giving any Democrat a chance. Perhaps that could change if the infamous Ten Commandments judge, Roy Moore, wins the GOP nomination. But Moore has won statewide as recently as 2012, which is something no Alabama Democrat can say. Democrats havent held a U.S. Senate seat in Alabama in 20 years, since Howell Heflin was replaced by Jeff Sessions.

So more than likely Democrats looking for a boost going into the midterm-election year of 2018 will rely on their solid prospects in the two states holding regular gubernatorial elections in November, New Jersey and Virginia.

The Garden State contest looks like a very solid bet to break the Democratic losing streak. This remains a fundamentally Democratic state; Hillary Clinton handily defeated Donald Trump 5541 there in 2016, and the state legislature has been under Democratic control since 2004. Democratic gubernatorial candidate Phil Murphy (a former ambassador to Germany and one of the remarkably large cast of former Goldman Sachs officials in politics these days) has money to burn and is fresh from an easy June 6 primary win over a large field. Republican Kim Guadagno won her primary pretty easily as well, but as lieutenant governor she is laboring in the large and dark shadow of Chris Christie.

According to a post-primary Quinnipiac poll, Christies job-approval rating has dropped to an astounding 15 percent, the worst Quinnipiac has found in any state for any governor in the last 20 years. (Not that he cares.) Unsurprisingly, the same poll showed Murphy leading Guadagno by better than a two-to-one margin (55 percent to 26). The best news for the Republican is that half of voters dont know enough about her to have an opinion of her though it is unclear where Guadagno will get the money or the credibility to convince them shes what the state needs.

In Virginia, the Gillespie/Northam campaign has just begun, but a new Quinnipiac poll shows Northam leading 47 percent to 39. Aside from a united party and the support of reasonably popular incumbent governor, Terry McAuliffe, Northam has history on his side: Nine of the last ten Virginia gubernatorial races were lost by the candidate from the party controlling the White House (McAuliffe, in fact, was the one exception). Things could change, but Donald Trump does not seem like the kind of president who will help his party buck that trend in a state he lost last year.

So Democrats who are wondering why they cannot have good things may only have to wait for a little less than five months for some validation.

The Trump administration doesnt seem to be taking the threat of future Russian election interference very seriously.

Were about to find out what Mattiss Pentagon will do with mostly unchecked authority to conduct a war.

Should Democrats in places like Georgia keep trying to rebuild white support? Or should they focus on minority mobilization? The debate goes on.

A new report suggests Obama knew about Putins intervention in the 2016 election and its aims, but didnt move aggressively until it was too late.

The emergence of a new game plan, from persuasion to motivation.

Look, I dont know who you are, wiseass, Biden reportedly said.

One surprised music critic reviews Mystified.

The Justice Departments handling of the Clinton email investigation is at the center of the senators questions.

Dean Heller of Nevada said he could not support legislation as written. Now things get dicey for Mitch McConnell.

Turns out, the former FBI director was attending an event for a nonprofit that works with abused children.

D.C. might still be revolving around legislative gridlock and investigations. But the electoral landscape would be very different.

A U.S. representative said he couldnt back the resolution which condemned violence against women because it supported safe abortion.

Obamacares popularity seems to be peaking just as Republicans get closer to taking it down in legislation that is not popular at all.

The Saudi-led coalition wants the tiny Gulf state to cut off ties with Iran and close Al Jazeera, ultimatums Qatar isnt likely to meet.

Change is slow. Thats why we have to keep working.

She met with a handful of Republican senators this week, but they couldnt agree on a plan.

The president also admitted that his tape bluff was an attempt to intimidate Comeys testimony.

A quick break from the off-camera briefings.

See the article here:
The Democrats' Losing Streak Will Likely End in November - New York Magazine

A Nebraska Democratic official has been removed Thursday from his chairman post after recordingsemerged in which he said he was glad that House Majority Whip Steve Scalise(R-La.) was shot and that he wished he had died.

In the recording, Phil Montag, who was the volunteerco-chairman of the Nebraska Democratic Partys technology committee, criticized Scaliseby saying his whole job is to convince Republicans to (expletive) kick people off (expletive) health care.

Im glad he got shot. I wish he was (expletive)dead.

The recordingwas posted on YouTube and other sites.

[Johnny Depp apologizes for joking about assassinating Donald Trump: I was only trying to amuse]

The comments surfaced just more than a week afterJames T. Hodgkinson opened fireon a congressional baseball team in Virginiawhere Scalise and four others were wounded. The gunman was shot and killed by police.

Montag could not be immediately reached for comment, but hetold the Omaha World-Herald that his statementsweretaken out of context from a30-minute to hour-long conversation.

I do not and did not wish for his death, Montag said to the World-Herald via email.

I am hopeful that the entirety of the original, unedited recording will emerge so we can get to the truth of the matter.

Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) spoke about visiting Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-La.) at the hospital, confirming he is "doing well." (Reuters)

Scaliseis still in the hospital and nowin fair condition, according to a post on his official Twitter account.

Scalisesoffice did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Nebraska Democratic Party Chair Jane Kleeb told The Washington Postthat she learned about the recording Thursday from the World-Herald, and that she immediately emailedMontag to tell him he was being removed from his position.

Ive been in politics and community organizations for the past 20 years, Kleeb said. Ive seen political rhetoric get heated, especially during the George W. Bush times, but we have reached a completely different level in our country now, and it is terrifying, and it is scary, and it just has to end.

The committee advised the party on new technologiessuch as new text-to vote tools, Kleeb said.

In the recording, Montag was speaking withNebraska Democratic Party Black Caucus chair Chelsey Gentry-Tipton, whohas been embroiled in her own controversial comments about Scalise.

She had written in a Facebook post about the shooting that Watching the congressman crying on live tv abt the trauma they experienced. Y is this so funny tho?

The Nebraska Republican Party calledMontag and Gentry-Tiptons comments completely reprehensible and disappointing, according to the Associated Press. It also posted a message to Facebook saying, this is not a partisan matter and this type of toxic rhetoric must be condemned at every level.

ICYMI: The Nebraska Republican Party Calls on Brad Ashford to join other Democratic Party Leaders and Denounce Toxic Rhetoric #NE02

Posted by Nebraska Republican Party onFriday, June 23, 2017

The controversy in Nebraska comesas politicians from both sides of the aisle have called for a more civil tone in the political conversation, and artistic productions and celebrity comments have faced criticism for what somesay is the promotion ofviolence.

Recently, conservatives have criticized a production of Shakespeares Julius Caesar in New Yorks Central Park, wheretitle character, who resembles President Trump, is assassinated. On Friday, actorJohnny Depp apologized for making remarks about assassinating the president.

I apologize for the bad joke I attempted last night in poor taste about President Trump. It did not come out as intended, and I intended no malice. I was only trying to amuse, not to harm anyone, he said in a statement to People.

Read more:

California just added four more discriminatory states to its travel ban

Dear Gwyneth: Your Goop energy stickers are not made with NASA material NASA

See the rest here:
'I'm glad he got shot': Nebraska Democrat caught on tape criticizing Rep. Steve Scalise - Washington Post