Archive for the ‘Democrat’ Category

CNHI honors Democrat’s Jones, Lynn – Suwannee Democrat

LIVE OAK Two of the Suwannee Democrats reporters were honored among CNHIs best Monday.

Mike Jones was named CNHIs 2016 Sports Writer of the Year for Division III while Thomas Lynn was the companys 2016 Reporter of the Year for Division III. CNHI is the parent company of the Suwannee Democrat.

Jones, who came to the Democrat in January 2016, was honored for an entry that included features on former Suwannee High star Jimmie Taylor IIIs success at Rider University as well as SHS golfer Matthew Hilliard overcoming spina bifida. Game coverage was also part of Jones work that impressed the judges, including a Suwannee High football win last fall and Lafayette Highs baseball state championship last spring.

Mike regularly hits it out of the park on features, Democrat editor Jamie Wachter said. His story on Taylors rise from Jenkins Park to Division I basketball was especially a great read.

Mike has made quite an impact on our sports coverage in Suwannee, Hamilton and Lafayette counties.

Lynn also made an impression in a short time, joining the Democrat last April. Among Lynns winning works were a story on a local resident gaining her U.S. citizenship, East Coast residents finding shelter locally from Hurricane Matthew, a feature on Sam Jones sunflower fields in Hamilton and Suwannee counties and a look at domestic violence in Suwannee County.

Weve been blessed to have a talented, versatile journalist like Tom, Wachter said. He has a passion for journalism and is equally adept at covering hard news as well as writing touching features.

Publisher Myra Regan added about the two award winners: Were well aware of the talented, hard-working journalists Mike and Tom are, and its good to see them receive that recognition from others too.

CNHI, a private company based in Montgomery, Alabama, is one of the leading publishers of local news and information in the United States. Founded in 1997, its newspapers, Web sites and specialty publications serve more than 100 communities in 23 states throughout the United States.

Visit link:
CNHI honors Democrat's Jones, Lynn - Suwannee Democrat

Trump is talking like a big-spending Democrat – Washington Post

When President Trump is paying attention, he thinkswe're all Keynesians now.

"We're also going to prime the pump," he recentlytold the New York Times's Robert Draper, by which hemeans that the government is going to "spend money to make a lot more money in the future." That, he explained, is what will get the economy "going, and going big league, and having the jobs coming in and the taxes that will be cut very substantially and the regulations that'll be going."

Now, it's hard to say what exactly Trump has in mindhere, as it's not clear he himself does. What he seems to be saying, though, is that the government needs to spend more for the economy to grow more, which, given what we know about the kinds of things he supports, would probably mean investing a lot more in defense and infrastructure.But at the same time, he couldn't take too much out of everything else, because the whole idea is that the government would be spending more in total. Not that he seems to understand this, as we'll get to in a minute, whenhis budget would cut enough old spending to balance out all the new spending he's proposing.

Butthis is getting a little ahead of ourselves. As is the case whenever Trump talks about policy, the relevant questions are whether he actually means it, and whether Republicans in Congress would go along if he did.

Let's take those in reverse order. Members of Congress are the only ones who can follow through on Trump's kind-of, sort-of promise to "spend more money to make a lot more money," but that might be too hypocritical even for them. Now, on the one hand, Republicans havealways had a double standard when it comes to the deficit. They treat itlike an existential threat to the republic when they don't control the White House, but an afterthought when they do especially if it's the result of one of their big, beautiful tax cuts. Indeed, even Rep. Mark Meadows (N.C.), the leader of the far-right House Freedom Caucus, has said that, as a "fiscal conservative," he'd be okay with tax cuts that aren't "fully offset" by spending cuts or other revenue increases. Never mind that those words don't mean what he thinks they mean. The point is that the GOP won't have any problem with half of Trump's deficit-increasing agenda.

But, on the other hand, so many Republicans have convinced themselves that the road to hell is paved with too much spending that they wouldn't green-light any more of it even if Ronald Reagan's ghost came back to tell them to build that border wall. It's not just that the Grover Norquist wing of the party wants to shrink the government below bathtub size. It's that their activists have tried to come up with some story they can tell themselves about what went wrong during the George W. Bush years that doesn't involve the words "Iraq" or "Wall Street," and spending is the one they've settled on. Back then, Republicans in Congress rubber-stamped Bush's unfunded expansion of the welfare state (Medicare Part D) and the security state (the Department of Homeland Security). It was this betrayal of principles, they believe, that made Bush so unpopular, and it's something that at least the most ideological of them don't want to repeat. That's why the House Freedom Caucus prevented House Speaker Paul D. Ryan (R-Wis.) from passing any of what they deemed insufficiently austere budgets last year, and why they would like to see further cuts than the ones Trump has proposed, particularly to entitlements.

And that brings us to what has been the defining feature of the Trump presidency. For all his populist talk, Trump doesn't know, care, or follow policy well enough to make any of it actually happen. He might say that he supports Keynesian stimulus, but his budget wouldn't increase spending, and, in fact, would impose deeply unrealistic cuts to everything but the Defense Department.He might say that he wants "insurance for everybody," but his health-care plan would have taken it away from 24 million people, including a lot of the older and poorer folks who propelled him to the presidency. And he might say that he'll rip up our trade agreements and replace them with great, great deals, but he has just made minor tweaksto them instead.

So although it may not be hard to imagine Trump getting into the budgetary equivalent of trench warfare with House Republicans, that would depend on him first realizing that his own plan doesn't increase spending, then insisting that his new one actually do so, and finallyfollowing through with a more detailed legislative strategy than just sending a few mean tweets to try to get Congress to pass it. In other words, an alternative fact. In the real world we live in, Trump just doesn't seem to have the intellectual stamina to do anything other than send 140-character book reports on whatever cable news show he's watching.

Trump isn't really a Keynesian. He just plays one on TV.

Here is the original post:
Trump is talking like a big-spending Democrat - Washington Post

The Russiagate Scam Will Blow Up In The Democrats’ Smug Faces – Townhall

|

Posted: Apr 03, 2017 12:11 AM

If youre stressed out about this whole Russian nonsense, relax Donald Trump didn't do anything wrong, and he's not going be impeached, arrested, or ritually disemboweled. When the truth comes out and it explodes in the Democrats soft, girlish hands, well all be laughing and toasting their humiliation with Stoli shots.

How do I know this with utter certainty? Because it's all so glaringly obvious, and its the only scenario that fits the facts. As Hugh Hewitt says, this scandal has three silos. The first silo is the question of whether the Russians somehow hacked our election. The second silo is whether any Trump people colluded with the Russians. The third silo, the one patriots care most about since its the one that isnt a ridiculous fantasy, is whether anyone in Obama's administration used our intelligence apparatus to spy on his and Hillarys political opponents. The answers are No, No, and Yes. The end results are going to be a stronger Trump, weaker Democrats, and various Obama minions exploring new career opportunities in the exciting fields of license plate-making, large-to-small rock transformation, and artisanal pruno distilling.

Russians didnt hack the election. Liberals use the word hacked because they can claim they only mean influenced while implying to stupid people inclined to believe their conspiracy theories that the Russians broke into computers and changed votes from Hillary to Donald. Of course, they forgot to also change the Senate votes to the Dems, but whatev.

Even James Comey agrees that never happened, so now the Democrats are claiming that Russian social media bots used fake news to trick the previously Hillary-inclined electorate into voting against her. Basically, theyre saying Hillarys supporters were easily duped idiots. Now, dummies have always been a key Democrat demographic. She clearly has a unique appeal to the stupid, the gullible, and the readily confused, making the voters she was counting on especially vulnerable to those cunning Russian clickbaiters operating from secret Macedonian villages.

Well, I was exploring the shocking real reason CHiPS went off the air, which was going to stun me, when I saw a story on OMGLinks that Hillary Clinton had an alien baby. Why, then I knew I had to vote for Donald Trump because I hate aliens. We got to build us a wall around space and make them Space Mexicans pay for it!

I was using my portable computer machine to internet, and I was about to have my jaw dropped by what Joyce Dewitt of Threes Company looks like today, when I saw the link to proof that Hillary and Bill Clinton are gun-grabbing devil worshipers. So I had to vote for Trump, because I cling to my guns and my religion and my other guns.

Their alternate version of You Stole My Morons! is that the release of the damning facts contained in John Podesta and Felonia von Pantsuits emails made people think she was terrible. People thought that because those emails showed, beyond any doubt, that she is terrible, and that her Democrat Party is less a political organization than a disorganized crime ring. Remember that when the media gets angry about the emails, the reason is that you got accurate information about the medias partisan pals that the media wanted hidden from you. Democracy dies in darkness all right; the media is trying to strangle it in an unlit alley.

The Trump campaign never colluded with the Russians. This is true even though the definition of colluding has been expanded to include pretty much any interaction with anyone or anything Russian. If they found out Reince Preibus had an old DVD of Rush Hour, Adam Schiff would be in front of a mic with CNN cutting in live. The whole stupid collusion thing has become a weird, Beautiful Mind-esque conspiracy theory with scores of Trumpaphobic loonies out there sharing their bizarre spider webs of intrigue via Twitter memes. Does Gorky Park have a grassy knoll?

Regardless, its safe to say that there was absolutely no collusion of any kind between Team Trump and anyone Russian. None. How do I know this to a near certainty? Because we haven't seen anybody leak any evidence of any in the six-plus months that they've been pushing this nonsense.

Nothing.

Butbutbut Ivan Ivanoskys airplane was in Utah once and Utah has the Great Salt Lake and Trump put salt on his taco and ALL THE PIECES FIT!

Nothing.

You think the geniuses leading our intelligence community not the brave and dedicated folks in the trenches but the clowns and political suck-ups lording over them could have or would have kept real collusion secret? Do you think if Trump was cavorting with the former commies we wouldnt have heard about it from the NYT, the WaPo and the rest of the Democrat steno pool about a week before November 8th?

Get. Real.

And that brings us to the third silo, because the Democrat heads of our intelligence community desperately wanted to leak anything that might remotely embarrass Trump. In fact, my money has always been on the person who leaked the classified Flynn info being a name well all recognize, a suspicion Foxs Adam Housleys reporting backs up. Hell yes, Donald Trump was "wiretapped. So were you, by the way. And me. From open source information shared by defectors the intelligence community was too incompetent to keep from defecting, we know that every single electronic communication we send is collected in the NSA mainframes. Every single one. And the NSA has algorithms they can use to search it. You dont go plant a bug in Trump Tower. You wiretap the opposition partys nominee for president by running a search through the communications that the government incidentally collected. And if you find something juicy, then you call up your buddy at the Post and hand it over.

If. Does anyone here think for a millisecond that the Obama-appointed leadership in the intelligence community, whose loyalty is to their own political class and not to the country, would hesitate for a microsecond before leaking something they thought would hurt Trump? We know they wouldnt hesitate because they didn't hesitate they feloniously released a classified transcript involving Mike Flynn just to shaft him and the Administration. Flynn did not do anything illegal in that illegally released transcript; he misled the Veep about the topics he (legally and properly) discussed, and for that he got canned. So why is his lawyer demanding immunity? Because his lawyer isnt a drooling moron working rear-ender soft tissue cases out of a van down by the river; no quarter-competent lawyer is going to let his client walk into a Democrat witch hunt without either ironclad immunity or the words I take the Fifth on his lips you know, just like all of Hillarys people did.

The only crime we know about for sure the only one is that some senior member of Obamas intelligence community committed a felony by leaking classified information regarding Mike Flynn's intercepted communications. That's it. And thats why the Democrats would rather talk about anything else. Understand that everything the Democrats say is a lie. Every single word, plus the punctuation. Theyre dumb, but they're not so stupid as not to realize that this Putin nonsense, manufactured as a pathetic excuse for their utter humiliation in November, is falling apart. With the help of their media minions, they hope if they keep shouting Look, Russians! well grow so bored well just tune out. Its their only hope for keeping Obamas buddies off the chopping block. They all thought Hillary was going to win and that there would be no accountability, so they were safe using the government systems they had been entrusted to manage to spy on their incoming bosss political opponents. Oops.

Look, I have friends who think differently, and Ive carefully considered their views because some are serious people. They really believe that there is something out there. Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe it was Russian-inspired clickbait stories on Facebook that magically converted hundreds of thousands of dedicated Im with her Hillary fans in the Rust Belt into #MAGA hat-wearing Trumpmaniacs. Maybe liberal Washington D.C. establishment types had the honor and patriotism required to keep a juicy tidbit like Trump playing footsie with the Russians under wraps for better than half a year. And maybe Lena Dunham will get put on the cover of the next Sports Illustrated swimsuit edition.

Yeah, no. I'm not wrong. This is all going to blow up in the Democrats faces, and when it does I'm going to laugh and raise my vodka glass in a joyous toast to their latest and greatest failure. ?? ????????!

Nuke 'Em: On Judicial Nominations, GOP Must Punish Democrats for Decades of Unprecedented Escalation

Link:
The Russiagate Scam Will Blow Up In The Democrats' Smug Faces - Townhall

House Democrats Take Wait-and-See Approach – Roll Call

House Democrats are taking a two-pronged approach for leverage in a divided but still Republican-led Congress: Let the majority duke it out among themselves, and wait and see whether tooffer votes when there is not enough GOP support to advance key legislation.

The fissures in the GOP were on full display in late March when Speaker Paul D. Ryan pulled a bill that aimed to repeal and replace parts of the 2010 health care law because it failed to get support from the conservative and moderate wings of the party.

That opens Republican leadership up to the possibility of needing Democratic votes in the future, though some GOP caucus members demurred when asked about the notion.

As Ryan announced that he was yanking the health care bill from the House floor on March 24, Democrats chanted, Vote! Vote! Vote! in the chamber, encouraging Republicans to take the vote. That would have forced members of the GOP who campaigned on repealing the health care law to vote no publicly, potentially leaving them vulnerable in 2018.

The minority party has since exercised some restraint at times in criticizing their counterparts.

The best way to describe it was not exuberance in terms of our expression, it was an expression of relief that damage was not done, New York Rep.Joseph Crowley, the House Democratic Caucus chairman,told Roll Call about the bills failure. Part of what our strategy is going to be is to point out where we think the administration will move next to undermine the law.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosilast week panned Ryan for his disastrous performance during the health care episode.

The next congressional showdown is set for the last week in April, when lawmakers have to pass a spending package to keep the federal government in business.

When asked if Democrats would offer votes on a spending bill to avoid a government shutdown, Pelosi said, Well see.

While assertingthat bipartisan appropriators could negotiate an agreement among themselves, the California Democrat said her party colleagues would have to see what it is before pledging support.

There are areas, however, where Democrats wont budge,Pelosi said. A spending bill that includes funding for a wall on the southern border or funding cuts to agencies such as the National Institutes of Health is unlikely to garner support from virtually any of the 193 members of the minority party in the House.

House Minority Whip Steny H. Hoyer said Democrats could also take a back seat and let the majority fight publicly among themselves as a means of finding leverage.

We dont let them duke it out. They just duke it out, the Maryland Democrat said last week. They dont need our help, apparently, to do that.

President Donald Trump has on several occasions said he intends to work with Democrats to pass bills if factions of House Republicans refuse to come on board.

The failure of the health care bill was largely attributed to members of the House Freedom Caucus, a group of hard-line conservative Republicans, and members of the moderate Tuesday Group.

While Republicans have now vowed to revisit the effort after thefailure, they pledged to move on to an overhaul of the tax code they may need Democratic support if divisions within the GOP cannot bebridged.

Crowley didnt have a positive assessment of that.

The New York Democrat said the White House was speaking out of both sides of itsmouth by blaming Democrats for failing legislation, but then offering to reach out.

Crowley, Hoyer and a spokesman for Pelosi all said their offices had not been contacted by the White House.

You really cant have it both ways, Crowley said. There is so much distrust right now with this administration and the Democratic caucus, universally speaking that a path forward is not clear to us in terms of cooperation.

While Democrats insist there are areas of compromise, the details of such deals are scant. The chancesof working in a bipartisan way largely dependson the Republicans, Crowley said.

The leverage happens when theyre dysfunctional; they cant work amongst themselves, hesaid.

Crowley said that while Democrats dont support a government shutdown, they would not be held hostage by a spending package that includes money for the border wall, bars federal money from Planned Parenthood, or makes cuts to a host of other programs and agencies as Trumps first budget proposed.

We will not be held hostage, Crowley said of Republicans. If they do want to work in a bipartisan way, thats up to them.

Contact Rahman atremarahman@cqrollcall.comor follow her on Twitter at@remawriter

Get breaking news alerts and more from Roll Call on your iPhone or your Android.

Here is the original post:
House Democrats Take Wait-and-See Approach - Roll Call

Can Anti-Trump Fury Help a 30-Year-Old Democrat Win Gingrich’s Old Seat? – New York Magazine

In all senses, the sun was shining on Jon Ossoff. It was early in the evening on a Sunday in late March, and the suddenly very visible 30-year-old Democratic candidate in the first competitive special congressional election of the Trump era was riding shotgun in a sooty-black Chrysler Sebring, hunched over a paper plate of cheese and crackers, while a member of his staff steered toward the next fund-raiser through the hills of suburban Atlanta. The back of the car was piled high with half a dozen Nike shoe boxes, a stuffed owl, and a reporter. Between bites, Ossoff stared ahead at the road, indulging in long pauses as he considered what to say about his new life as the luckiest young man in American politics. Theres nothing that I would love more than a freewheeling conversation about political philosophy, he said. But Im cautious because, as you know, the knives are out right now.

That is not exactly how things appeared to most observers of this breakneck two-month campaign to fill the House seat vacated by Tom Price, the new secretary of Health and Human Services. Outside of the Sebring motorcade, Ossoff looks like the poster boy of the resistance, the grassroots opposition to both President Donald Trump and the wave of nationalism that installed him in office. He is a relative neophyte running 20 points ahead of a divided Republican field in a congressional district that hasnt been blue since Jimmy Carter, also a Georgian, was president; an anonymous congressional aide turned documentary-film producer made into a national political figure mostly by love from readers of the Daily Kos; a pleasant, generic hipster-technocrat vessel into which an entire nation of angry Democrats has poured its electoral hopes (not to mention its millions of dollars literally millions, a wild haul for a first-time nobody in a two-month race).

In this brave new post-2016 world, the Ossoff campaign is an experiment of sorts, a Trump-backlash trial balloon that might on April 18, when the first round of voting is held, or on June 20, when the likely runoff will be completed tell us just how much the president has reshaped the electoral map. It may also tell us that Democrats will have to do a whole lot more than just ride the wave of Trump hate to have a real chance of puncturing House Republicans red wall in 2018. Which is where Tom Perez, the new chairman of the Democratic National Committee, tends to come down. Our mistakes, I think, were not just in 2016, he told me, sketching out his vision for how the party might win back control of the federal government. Our mistakes were a number of years in the making. We ignored too many voters. We got away from a 50-state strategy. And we took too many people for granted. Now, Perez said, hes focused on making up for lost time, which includes plans to channel resources into Georgias Sixth District. Were going to work hard down there, he said, because underdogs win.

By March, anti-Trump enthusiasm and the national spotlight had made the Ossoff campaign look considerably less underdog-y; most recent polls put him at 40 percent, within striking distance of a majority (which would win him the seat outright and allow him to avoid a runoff in which a Republican candidate could consolidate conservative voters). The Atlanta suburbs seemed so upended by the race it almost didnt feel like the South at all; traveling from Trumps Washington, D.C., to what Ossoff hopes will soon become his Georgia seat is like walking out of the Gathering of Juggalos and into the Metropolitan Opera. Hes our hope, Carol Finkelstein, a 71-year-old from Sandy Springs, told me in her placid living room on a recent Saturday, just before Ossoff took to the carpet to address her neighbors. He cant stop a runaway train, but Im hoping he can at least be a voice of reason. Nearby, Barbara Brown, a 93-year-old whos also committed to voting for Ossoff, was less diplomatic. Im an Independent, she told me. My husband was the Republican, but we dont have to worry about him anymore.

Georgias sixth district is a constellation of predominantly white suburbs just north of Atlanta. It has been Republican territory for decades; before Tom Price, the seat was held, for 20 years, by Newt Gingrich (who told me hes not paying attention to the race but nevertheless thinks its highly unlikely a Democrat could ever win here though I dont have any special, inside knowledge, he said). So it required a series of unusually lucky breaks for Ossoff to find himself ahead of this field of 18. First, there was the presidential election: Although Price had enjoyed comfortable support since he entered office in 2005, winning his seat by 23 points in the fall, the president eked out a much smaller margin: 1.5 percent news that rang like a dog whistle for Democrats across the country. Its a very affluent, well-educated district, according to David Worley, who in 1990 nearly beat Gingrich. Worley told me, A lot of traditional Republican voters, suburban voters, were clearly turned off by Trump. Then there was Prices decision to join the administration, throwing his once-secure seat into the vast unknown. I didnt start to think about running until Prices nomination, Ossoff said. Its something that I thought I might do in life, but no time soon.

Hes our hope, one supporter said. He cant stop a runaway train, but Im hoping he can at least be a voice ofreason.

When he did enter the race, he did so dramatically and shrewdly. One of his early fund-raising emails was titled, simply, Make Trump Furious, and so far people, egged on by liberal blogs, have committed to doing just that, to the tune of $4 million, in what he proudly claims are donations averaging $35 apiece. None of the Republicans, its safe to say, has come close to that, although one Republican super-PAC has already spent $2.2 million on ads attacking Ossoff. On the other side, the Democratic Party has paid for nine Ossoff staffers, Nancy Pelosi has thrown a fund-raiser, and Cory Booker has tweeted his support.

Scarcely a week after wed endorsed him, Ossoff broke our all-time fund-raising record for a single campaign, which was held by none other than Elizabeth Warren, for whom wed raised over $400,000 back in 2012, David Nir, the political director of Daily Kos, told me. And a couple of weeks ago, he became our first-ever million-dollar candidate. As a result, something else interesting has happened. Our initial fund-raising was so berserk that it prompted a flurry of media attention, which in turn helped Ossoff raise more money, generating even more media attention. Its been a very fruitful, positive feedback loop.

And then there are the volunteers: nearly 8,000, according to the campaign, an astonishing number in a district that cast only 330,000 votes for Congress in November. Asked where that number came from, Andy Phelan, Ossoffs communications director, told me, That figure is based on how many people have signed up to volunteer on our website. Every weekend, were getting hundreds and cumulatively thousands of volunteers to go canvassing and phone-banking in any of our four field offices. That includes actress Alyssa Milano, who was going door-to-door canvassing and, on Twitter, offered to personally give anyone who needed one a ride to the polls. One favorite volunteer T-shirt read VOTE YOUR OSSOFF.

And so Republicans are watching, including rather powerful ones. Ossoff running smart campaign, Steve Bannon, the presidents chief strategist, told me in a text. A White House official close to him said hes preoccupied with whats happening some 600 miles south of Pennsylvania Avenue.

Its something that Im tracking specifically for Bannon, the official said, and keeping an eye on, following all the polls, following the kind of narrative out there so its definitely something were paying attention to and the political departments paying attention to as well. Surely, then, theyve noticed that the field is so vast 18 candidates, larger than the Republican-primary field in 2016, which was memorably chaotic that its enabled Ossoff to rise above the infighting plaguing candidates on both sides. While old-hand local Democrats in the race whine about what theyre calling Ossoffs coronation, the Republican who is polling closest to him, Karen Handel a former Georgia secretary of State, gubernatorial candidate, and breast-cancer activist who resigned from the Susan G. Komen foundation when it decided to continue funding Planned Parenthood is 20 points behind him. Even many supporters fear her campaign is floundering; she recently came under attack by the conservative Club for Growth (an ad criticized her for spending money to plant trees on government property for the purpose of beautifying it). Trumps former campaign manager Corey Lewandowski has stumped for another candidate, Bruce LeVell the presidents former diversity chief, who has been campaigning as the real Trump candidate in this race.

Still, the White House is optimistic that some Republican or other will keep the seat from Ossoff, a real possibility if he falls short on April 18 and is forced into the runoff. I think that buzz translated into higher poll numbers than hell get on Election Day, the official said. Its really easy for Ossoff to run against the shadow of Trump, the specter of Trump, this bogeyman because theres no official candidate. But once we have a candidate who can make a case for themselves, I think the polling will change pretty quickly.

On paper, Ossoff seems great to Democrats: Hes an overachieving millennial who looks like a cross between Gumby and Justin Trudeau and who speaks slowly and deliberately in a way that can remind you of Barack Obama, something hes been told before. Maybe the reason he spoke in some way kind of like this is because he was trying to do the same thing, Ossoff told me, which is to be precise and accurate and thoughtful and substantive and say what you mean and what you feel and what you think is right without serving up something that the opposition can easily slice, dice, and throw up against you. He seemed to be slyly talking about Trump but also expressing a principle of self-preservation: With Republicans waiting for him to fuck up, hes jumpy, hyperaware that trackers could be filming him at any time, ready to clip anything he says and use it in an attack ad. Its important that you understand that Im not saying you dont say what you really mean, he told me. What Im saying is your brain is working at 300 percent all the time because you need to both do that and parse your words in such a way that it cant be used against you. All of this makes him a radically boring person to talk or listen to, especially compared with the fiery rhetoric of Trump or Bernie Sanders. Its challenging, he admitted.

A lifelong Democrat, Ossoff was born Thomas Jonathan Ossoff to a Russian-Lithuanian father and Australian-immigrant mother who were active in local politics and helped him, as a young boy with no siblings but a pit-bull mutt named Mattie, stake lawn signs into the front yard for Maynard Jackson, the first black mayor of Atlanta (parts of DeKalb County can vote in that election). His list of extracurriculars, detailed in his official biography, is almost comically long: At Paideia, an expensive private school in Atlanta, he played baseball and ultimate Frisbee; when he was 17, he interned in the Washington office of John Lewis, the congressman and civil-rights hero who endorsed his candidacy and later released supportive television ads; at Georgetowns School of Foreign Service, he sang bass in an a cappella group and performed at the Kennedy Center while working part time for Representative Hank Johnson; at the London School of Economics, where he earned his masters, he played third base for the South London Pirates in the British Baseball Federation. According to public records, he has also acquired pilot, hunting, and fishing licenses. He now considers himself a journalist, he says, since he runs an Emmy Awardwinning documentary-film-production company called Insight TWI: The World Investigates, which produces features about various global injustices for places like Al Jazeera (whose $5,000 payment to TWI has been flagged by his Republican rivals). All of this makes Ossoff the kind of figure an old person would say has a good head on his shoulders.

But he is also, that old person might notice, green at 30, Barack Obama was just graduating from Harvard Law and on the trail, it shows. He has the right profile and the right temperament for suburban Democrats whod have probably preferred another Obama term, but in the short campaign, he hasnt yet managed to refine his pitch. He talks mostly about holding those in power accountable, suggesting he could use his documentary-filmmaker chops in the Capitol, perhaps by setting up an investigative unit in his office a nice idea, but what it would look like, or how it would be better or more effective than the House Oversight Committee, is not entirely clear. Hes reluctant to get into specifics on other matters not because he cant, its clear when talking to him, but because hes afraid anything he says will come back to haunt him. Asked to explain his ideal foreign policy, he said simply, Tough and smart, before finally explaining that meant avoiding quagmires like the Iraq War but adding that there arent any members of Congress who come to mind whose foreign policy aligns closely with his. And when I asked him to describe his political philosophy for me an innocuous-enough question for someone hoping to become one of 435 Americans serving in the House, he said, Its a good question, before pausing for 42 seconds. I think I would say focused on accountability and, um, he said, eventually, before pausing again, as an objective that can break the partisan divide. Because I think that between the Sanders phenomenon and Trumps election, the clear message is a complete loss of a faith in the political process and the institutions of government and a recognition that they are not accountable. To the extent Im trying anything new here in the Sixth District, its to try to build a coalition that crosses party lines because of a shared commitment to cleaner government.

Critics have cast him as a young man in a hurry, broadly deriding him as unserious and underdeveloped. One early attack ad used footage of him dressed as Han Solo in college (The best word I can think of is lame, Perez said of the ad; it backfired). A more recent one tried to link him to anarchists protesting Trumps inauguration in D.C. (just as outlandish, given Ossoffs very apparent liberal Establishmentarianism). More reasonable is skepticism about his national-security credentials. When he announced his candidacy, Ossoff said in a press release that he served Georgia as a national-security staffer in Congress for five years before leaving government for the private sector, something hes repeated often on the stump. But he joined Johnsons staff part time in January 2007 and left five years later, after becoming a full-time employee, in the summer of 2012, meaning that for his claim to be true, hed have to have been a 20-year-old college student moonlighting as a national-security adviser. And the Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported last month that his campaign told them hed received top-secret security clearance after the 2006 election, but when the campaign, under mounting pressure, released a precise timeline of his career as a congressional aide a few weeks later, it was revealed that he actually received the clearance in March 2012 meaning he couldve had it for only five months. But Johnson, who served on the Armed Services Committee until the most recent Congress, was quite direct in telling me that concerns about Ossoffs background were unfounded and that, yes, someone barely old enough to drive had been advising him on matters of existential importance to the country. Jon was an exceptional young man, he said. Jons level of influence and his level of work in the office probably exceed what he has written on his bio because he and I have just been so very close.

Those looking to nitpick the rsum could find some smaller nits, too: Ossoff doesnt live in the district, but a mile or so south, within walking distance of Emory University, where his girlfriend of 12 years, Alisha Kramer, is studying to be an OB/GYN; hes careful to say he was raised in North DeKalb County, not that hes based there now. And though he uses part of his stump speech to decry smart young people leaving the state to take their talents elsewhere, his own company, TWI, is based in London. (I think international business experience is an asset in a congressional candidate, particularly in a district with so much international commerce, he told me in response. If we can grow a more thriving economy, then more young folks like me will stay and do our work here.) But all told, Ossoff offers a clean, fresh political face. To look at the polls and count the fund-raising and volunteers that and Trump hate may just be enough.

On November 8, Ossoff was with a film crew and a right-wing militia in rural Georgia. I actually watched the returns come in on my cell phone around a campfire with heavily armed militiamen, he told me. They were thrilled by the result. To hear the news that way, he remembered, was surreal. When he left there, he made his way over to more familiar territory: Manuels Tavern, a Democratic watering hole just outside the district on North Highland Avenue, where a portrait of John F. Kennedy hangs above the liquor behind the bar. There, the mood was really grim, he said.

Anti-Trump fervor may be propelling Ossoffs meteoric rise, but after that initial, inspired fund-raising push his strategy has been to utter the presidents name precious little, to avoid alienating voters, hoping his manner of speaking and the values he discusses will be contrast enough for traditionally conservative or moderate voters to get the point. (This is another way Ossoffs campaign is a test case: Just how explicitly should Democrats run against Trump, and his still-committed voters, heading into 2018?) Standing in the middle of Carol Finkelsteins living room, he wore a dark suit with a burgundy tie, the suits trim tailoring and the ties appropriate length yet another reminder of whose regime hes campaigning against. Of course, we all saw how razor-thin the presidents margin of victory was in this district, because it is a moderate district with pretty discerning, well-informed voters who judge candidates rather than political parties, he told the crowd encircling him. We are the first up to bat, he said, and the countrys looking at us to see what kind of statement were gonna make. He often laments what he told me was the fundamental mistake Hillary Clinton made by disparaging or attacking voters and not speaking to a broad enough group of people, something he said was a failure of strategy more than tactics. And in conversation, he goes to great lengths to talk about all Americans with what he says is a basic level of respect. I do speak to his supporters. Im campaigning across the district to folks with all views, he said. One of the rules of running for Congress is no matter where you go, you speak like youre speaking to the whole district.

At Pour Bistro in Atlanta, Ossoff was introduced by a supporter as the Ayatollah of the Sixth District, and he appeared to hold back a grimace. Hopefully that wont become a famous moment, he told the crowd, which laughed in response perhaps not quite as worried about that as Ossoff is. He wove through his stump speech, which I heard over and over again as I followed him throughout the district to well-attended house parties where supporters sipped beer and La Croix: born in North DeKalb County, by the Northlake Mall; went to Georgetown; learned on Capitol Hill how D.C. both works and doesnt work. He hadnt thought hed get back into politics that is, until November, a line that sometimes draws laughs and other times sober silence. What we learned in November, I think more important than our views about any candidate or any party, is that theres a real loss of faith in this country in the political system and in our institutions, he said. John Lewis encouraged him to run and promised to support him if he did, so I threw my hat into the ring, and its been a fast-paced few months. Usually you have a year and a half to put together a congressional campaign. This is all happening in just a few months. But more important than how fast hes moving, he says, is how fast the country is. This is the first competitive race in the country since the presidential election, its the first chance to make a statement about what we stand for, and the eyes of the country are on us.

Parker Short, a 15-year-old boy from Dunwoody with a cherubic face, was looking on, taking photos and smiling as Ossoff spoke. The Womens March in Atlanta had been monumental and a life-changing experience for him, he told me, and he was even more excited about Ossoff. He represents my beliefs, and hell get a lot done in Washington thatll help the people of our city, he told me. I wanna be a politician, he added. Either Congress or more local. Ive already volunteered, I did some canvassing, Ive been handing out signs. Its been wonderful.

His mother sat a few feet away at the bar. Hes the future, she said.

*This article appears in the April 3, 2017, issue of New York Magazine.

Ivanka Trumps Neighbor Watched the Protests Against Her While Sipping a Glass of Wine

Sharon Stone Recorded a Spoken-Word Poem for Maxine Waters and Its Really Something

Mitch McConnell Admits the Rule That Blocked Merrick Garland Is Not Actually a Rule

Kirsten Gillibrand Is Becoming a Progressive Champion. Is a 2020 Run Next?

Twitter Is Having a Lot of Fun With Melania Trumps Official White House Portrait

How to Get Your Next Profile Picture to Look Like Melania Trumps Official Portrait

The attack came days after the Trump administration indicated that it is comfortable with the Syrian dictator remaining in power.

Trump defenders no longer have to charge shadowy deep state operatives with conspiring against the 45th president.

The MTA now expects the repairs to take 15 months instead of 18.

Extreme vetting may require even short-term visitors from U.S. allies to hand over their phones, passwords, finances, and ideological views.

The employee, Monica Douglas, alleges that she was subjected to years of racist slurs by the networks former comptroller.

His message of tribalism is his most successful and dangerous accomplishment.

The Democrats most unlikely holy warrior smells rebellion in the air.

GOP representatives say theyre close to unveiling a proposal that would weaken protections for people with preexisting conditions.

The attorney general ordered a review of police reform agreements nationwide to ensure they dont violate the Trump administrations principles.

You have to understand where the levers are, said a defense official. You dont have to like it, but that is where they are.

This is just the latest sign that Gorka, ostensibly a counterterrorism expert, has deep ties to Hungarys far-far-right.

The much-derided chairman of the House Intelligence Committee is not in any kind of tangible political trouble in his conservative district.

An explosive new report from the Washington Post alleges the shadowy founder of the Blackwater security firm held secret talks in the Seychelles.

A total of $78,333.32.

In 2015, Sanderss free college bill had zero co-sponsors. The one introduced Monday already has five.

The pathetically weak separation between the president and his office keeps getting weaker.

After a warm White House reception for a leader the Obama administration had shied away from because of human-rights concerns.

If the Democrats attempt to block Gorsuch leads to the abolition of the filibuster, that would be a good thing.

In response, the GOP seems ready to go nuclear.

Dozens more were injured in the blast in the subway system of Russias second-largest city.

See the original post:
Can Anti-Trump Fury Help a 30-Year-Old Democrat Win Gingrich's Old Seat? - New York Magazine