Archive for the ‘Democrat’ Category

Nunes tries to blame Democrats for troubled Russia probe – Politico

Schiff fires back, questioning why Nunes called off a hearing with former Obama officials.

By Aidan Quigley and Nolan D. McCaskill

03/29/17 10:41 AM EDT

Updated 03/29/17 03:45 PM EDT

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes on Wednesday tried to blame Democrats for the troubles plaguing the panels investigation into Russias apparent meddling in the election, as a prominent moderate Republican cast doubt on the future of the House probe.

Nunes has come under fierce criticism from Democrats, who have accused him of colluding with the White House to undermine the panels probe, which is also examining whether Trumps campaign colluded with Russian officials.

Story Continued Below

But Nunes on Wednesday claimed it was Democrats who were not dedicated to the investigation.

Were beginning to figure out whos actually serious about the investigation because it appears like the Democrats arent really serious about this investigation, he said, as reported by NBC News.

A spokesman for Rep. Adam Schiff, the ranking Democrat on the committee, blasted the comments. In a statement, the spokesman noted that it was Nunes who called off a hearing scheduled for Tuesday of this week with former Obama administration officials, including former acting Attorney General Sally Yates, former CIA Director John Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper. Yates and potentially others were expected to deliver testimony that contradicted prior administration statements about Russia contacts.

"The Minority submitted a list of witnesses to the Majority yesterday. This list represents only the first of many witnesses we believe should be called to testify, the spokesman said. Additionally, the Minority proposed days ago that two hearings be scheduled for next week both the closed hearing with [James] Comey and [Mike] Rogers requested by the Majority and the open hearing with Yates, Clapper and Brennan that had been previously agreed to by both parties and cancelled abruptly and unilaterally by the Chair. We have yet to receive a response."

Adding to Nunes woes, moderate Republican Rep. Charlie Dent on Wednesday questioned whether the House Intelligence Committees probe could reasonably go forward. Dent called the current state of the Houses investigation unfortunate.

My sense right now is the House is in a situation where the issue has become overly politicized, Dent told CNN. It doesnt seem like theres much cooperation on either side.

White House press secretary Sean Spicer reaffirmed the administration's confidence in Nunes during Wednesday's press briefing. "There is nothing that I see that is problematic in him conducting an investigation that we asked both the House and Senate intelligence committees (for)," he said.

Many Democrats, including Schiff, are calling for Nunes to step aside amid concerns of coordination between Nunes and the White House. After Nunes announced last week he had seen evidence that Trump associates were incidentally surveilled after the election, he revealed this week that he met with his source on White House grounds the day before.

Critics are raising concerns that Nunes is working with the White House to protect the president, which Nunes has denied. In particular, Schiff has criticized Nunes for canceling the public hearing that was scheduled to occur Tuesday and feature the former Obama officials.

Sally Yates is willing to testify, WH says they want her to testify, public wants to hear from her, Brennan and Clapper...what's the holdup? Schiff tweeted on Wednesday.

The controversy around the Houses probe intensified on Tuesday when The Washington Post reported that the White House tried to discourage Yates from testifying something Spicer later denied.

Tensions between Nunes and Schiff picked up after Schiff called for Nunes to recuse himself from the investigation Monday. But Nunes has repeatedly and emphatically said he will not step aside from the investigation.

Other members of the committee still have not seen the documents Nunes was referring to, which Trump said somewhat vindicated his unsubstantiated claim that he was wiretapped by President Barack Obama in Trump Tower before the election.

Nunes said the Democrats have not given him a witness list and said as far as he knew they had done very little to read the documents provided by the intelligence agencies.

So, at the end of the day here, were going to get to the truth, were going to find out whos actually doing a real investigation, he said.

Democrats on the committee have fired back against Nunes' complaints. Democrat Mike Quigley of Illinois told MSNBC he believes Nunes should step down and that Nunes appears to be stalling the investigation at the request of the White House.

"My point of view, it begins and ends at the White House," he said. "I believe, unfortunately, the chairman is following their orders. That is just my belief, I can't say I know for sure, but that is what makes the most sense to me."

Also criticizing Nunes this week was California Democrat Jackie Speier, who said Tuesday she "didn't trust" Nunes and thought he was "in over his head."

Democrats have also been calling for an independent investigation for weeks, joined by a handful of Republicans, including Sen. John McCain and Rep. Darrell Issa.

Get breaking news when it happens in your inbox.

By signing up you agree to receive email newsletters or alerts from POLITICO. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Sen. Richard Burr and Mark Warner are leading the Senates investigation, which Dent said is more credible than the Houses.

At a joint news conference Wednesday, Burr told reporters that seven professional staffers have been provided an unprecedented amount of documents that the committee should be finished examining within weeks. He said the panel has requested 20 individuals for interviews, five of whom he said are already on the docket.

The senators, however, would only identify Trump's son-in-law and senior adviser Jared Kushner as someone who will testify. They said his hearing won't be scheduled until after the committee has gathered enough information to know what to ask him.

This is one of the biggest investigations that the Hill has seen in my tenure here, said Burr, who admitted to voting for Trump but maintained that his job in the Senate overrides any personal beliefs that I have or loyalties that I might have.

This investigations scope will go wherever the intelligence leads it," Burr added.

And, in just one example of the stark contrast between how the House and Senate panels are operating, Warner, Burrs Democratic counterpart, backed him up.

I have confidence in Richard Burr, that we, together, with the members of our committee, are gonna get to the bottom of this, he told reporters. If you get nothing else from today, take that statement to the bank.

Continue reading here:
Nunes tries to blame Democrats for troubled Russia probe - Politico

Democrat in district won by Trump running for governor – The Hill

Rep. Tim Walz (D-Minn.) said Monday he will run for governor of Minnesota next year, creating a potential pickup opportunity for Republicans in a district won handily by President Trump.

Walz told the Post Bulletin that he will officially file the paperwork for his candidacy later Monday.

"I think now more than ever people are just wanting [government] to work. They are not looking for the partisanship. They are not looking for me to have all the answers, but they are certainly looking for me to bring people together to find those solutions that we all know are there," Walz said.

His decision to run for governor would make what was already expected to be a competitive district even more so in 2018.

He barely won reelection in November, defeating Republican Jim Hagedorn by less than a point. Hagedorn is already running for the seat again.

Trump won 53 percent of the vote in Walzs district, compared to Democratic nominee Hillary ClintonHillary Rodham ClintonCheney: Russian election interference could be act of war Conservatism's worst enemy? The Freedom Caucus. The Hill's 12:30 Report MOREs 38 percent.

The House GOP campaign organization, the National Republican Congressional Committee (NRCC), had already planned to make Walz a target next year.

Apparently, Tim Walz would rather bail out than face a tough race for his seat, NRCC spokesman Matt Gorman said in a statement. The NRCC will continue to target this open seat aggressively and are confident well turn it red in 2018.

Walz told the Post Bulletin that hes confident Democrats can keep the seat in their column. Democrats would need to flip 24 GOP-held seats in order to win back the House next year and can't afford to lose any seats they currently hold.

"I trust the people of the 1st District. I would argue they've chosen wisely six times in a row, and I anticipate they'll continue to do so, Walz said.

Walz is entering a crowded field for his party's gubernatorial nomination. Three other candidates are running for the Minnesota Democratic-Farmer-Labor nomination for governor: St. Paul Mayor Chris Coleman, Minnesota state Rep. Erin Murphy and State Auditor Rebecca Otto.

Rep. Rick Nolan (D-Minn.), another Democrat targeted by the NRCC in a district won by Trump, is also considering a gubernatorial bid.

See original here:
Democrat in district won by Trump running for governor - The Hill

Poll: Democrat Anger Towards Washington Politics Quadruples from Year-Ago – CNSNews.com (blog)

Poll: Democrat Anger Towards Washington Politics Quadruples from Year-Ago
CNSNews.com (blog)
Democrats are several times more likely to be perceived as angry about Washington politics than are Republicans - even by their fellow Democrats - a new Monmouth University survey shows. In general, 53% of Americans now say that all (9%) or most (44%) ...

Original post:
Poll: Democrat Anger Towards Washington Politics Quadruples from Year-Ago - CNSNews.com (blog)

Senior Senate Democrat: I’m Not Inclined To Support A Filibuster on Gorsuch – Townhall

As Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer tries to cobble the votes for a filibuster against President Trumps Supreme Court nominee Judge Neil Gorsuch, he might find that some heavyweights in his party arent all that enthused about the idea. Moreover, blocking a qualified nominee for the sake of screwing over Trump will only push Senate Republicans to nuke the filibuster for Supreme Court nominations, thereby ensuing that if a second vacancy opens upand that is possiblethe GOP will have no problems tilting the balance of the Court decidedly rightward. The Left is fighting a conservative who is filling a vacancyleft by a conservative. Congressional Democrats had very little powder to fight Trump, but after the death of heath care reform, they may be reevaluating their arsenal. In this case, its still an overreach, though Ill let Guy handle the deep dive on this later.

As for top Senate Democrats who arent inclined to support a filibuster, one of them is Sen. Pat Leahy (D-VT), who said that he probably wouldnt vote for Gorsuch, but is not onboard with this inane attempt to block him (via VT Diggers):

I am not inclined to filibuster, even though Im not inclined to vote for him, Leahy said.

Arcane Senate rules currently hold that any Supreme Court nominee must receive 60 votes before he or she can be given a confirmation vote on the floor. With Republicans holding a 52-seat majority, current rules dictate that eight Democratic senators must vote Yes in a cloture vote to bring Gorsuchs nomination before the Senate for a floor vote.

Around nine Senate Democrats said they support a hearing and a vote for Gorsuch, while the latter part of that statement remains to be seen. Could they be referring to the panel vote or do they actually mean cloture? If its cloture, then thats the ballgame. But Cortney wrote how Sen. Chris Coons (D-DE) said that Gorsuch will get an up-or-down vote, but fail to reach the 60-vote threshold (thats not what up-or-down means, Senator), noting that Senate Republicans will be forced to nuke the filibuster rules. Frankly, if Democrats want to force us to finish what Harry Reid started, then Im okay with that. Liberal America will be forced to accept a conservative Supreme Court majority for the next generation.

Someone familiar with the process told Townhall that while the Democrats are beating their chests about a filibuster, its still far from a sure thing. There are scores of red state Democrats running for re-election next year in states that Trump won decidedly, who may not be happy about Schumers attempt to Stuka dive bomb Gorsuch.

These Democratic claims about him not getting 60 votes I think are premature. Could definitely happen, but Leahy said today he's not inclined to back a filibuster, this source said. If you combine that with other like-minded Democrats who don't want to let GOP go nuclear on Gorsuch, plus the Trump-state guys (Manchin, Heitkamp, Tester, Donnelly, McCaskill) getting 60 [votes] seems feasible. I'd say 35% chance, which is a lot more than guys like Coons & [DNC chair] Tom Perez are giving it.

So, theres a prediction that Senate Democrats have a 35 percent chance of successfully pulling this off. Conventional wisdom says to fight another day (i.e. the second vacancy), but the progressive base is demanding all-out war. While Republicans were embarrassed by health care, it looks as if Democrats are running full steam into an iceberg on Gorsuch.

Gorsuch Vote Delayed By One Week

See the original post here:
Senior Senate Democrat: I'm Not Inclined To Support A Filibuster on Gorsuch - Townhall

Top Democrat says Russia probe went ‘off the rails’ – New York Post


USA TODAY
Top Democrat says Russia probe went 'off the rails'
New York Post
WASHINGTON The House Intelligence Committee's investigation into Russian interference in the presidential election is off the rails and its credibility is in doubt, according to the top Democrat on the committee. Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif ...
Democrats call for independent Russian probe apart from CongressUSA TODAY
Top Democrat on intel panel: House Russia probe went 'off the rails'Washington Examiner
Top House intelligence Democrat rebukes Nunes: 'This is deeply troubling'CNBC
New York Times -Washington Post -CBS News -TIME
all 2,040 news articles »

View post:
Top Democrat says Russia probe went 'off the rails' - New York Post