Archive for the ‘Democrat’ Category

While Trump Was Dominating In Deep-Red Oklahoma, This Democrat Won A Landslide – Huffington Post

As precinct data rolled into his war room at the Aloft Hotel in downtown Oklahoma City last November, Joe Maxwell realized his team had a landslide on its hands.

He saw no need to delay the victory speeches, having been up since before daybreak orchestrating a statewide get-out-the-vote operation for what was expected to be a close contest. His team took the elevator to the rooftop bar, where about 50 small farmers gathered anxiously to watch the returns and, they hoped, celebrate.

For the previous 14 months, they had battled a so-called right to farm ballot initiative, with Maxwell serving as the general (to quote his friends) of that campaign. Corporate agricultural interests in Oklahoma hoped the measure would protect factory farming from environmental, food safety and humanitarian regulations. The deep-red states Republican governor and every member of its all-GOP congressional delegation backed it.

In response, Maxwell, who works for the Humane Society,had helped assemble an opposition force of animal welfare activists, environmental groups, Native American tribes and family farmers. Few political strategists would have picked that coalition to overcome the influence of the states dominant industry. But there Maxwell was, quietly enjoying a beer as he listened to former state Attorney General Drew Edmondson (D)deliver the news of their crushing victory to a cheering audience. The no vote had carried every congressional district in the state and defeated Big Ag by more than 20 points.

Maxwell slapped a few backs, shook a few hands and made small talk about the view of Oklahoma Citys modest skyscrapers. The party broke up early, as people relocated to await the presidential returns. Maxwell and a few of his top deputies retreated to a bar down the street.

Not many Democrats enjoyed the evening of Nov. 8, 2016. A bit after 10 p.m., Maxwell called Barry Lynn, director of the Open Markets Program at the New America Foundation in Washington, D.C., to complain that he had no one to celebrate with.

Donald Trumps triumph last November was a victory for rural and small-town voters over metropolitan enclaves, the culmination of agrim trend for Democrats that has been intensifying since the 1990s. In 1996, Bill Clinton won nearly half of Americas 3,142 counties. Sixteen years later, Barack Obama carried fewer than 700 countiesand still won the election. Hillary Clinton carried just 487 and lost.

Running up the score in population centers isnt helping much with down-ballot contests either. As culturally liberal people move away from suburban and rural communities and concentrate themselves in cities, theyve increased the Democratic Partys margins in already blue areas but decreased them in swing suburban, exurban and rural districts. At the same time, Republicans haveaggressively gerrymandered many previously competitive districts, redrawing them to neutralize Democratic votes. Those two factors make it extremely difficult going forward for Democrats to win the U.S. House of Representatives, where theyve shed 69 seats since 2008, or state legislatures, where theyve ceded more than 900 seats over the same stretch, without revitalizing their position in exurban and rural America.

After the 2016 disaster, Democrats tasked Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney (D-N.Y.) with performing an independent autopsy of the partys disappointing performance in House races across the country. His team conjured a 350-variable mathematical model, studying hundreds of districts. The massive resulting equation predicts doom for Democrats in districts with few college-educated voters, but sees promise in wealthier, diversifying suburbs. It suggests a strategy that effectively writes off all of rural America.

Theyre just wrong, Maxwell said. They cant do that, and they dont have to.

Maxwells brand of politics looks beyond the poll-tested analytics that dominate Washington. Even the best mathematical models tools like Maloneys current project are only useful at a particular snapshot in time. They treat voters as static data points, rather than human beings capable of changing their minds. A model might focus on the number of Democrats registered in a district to predict the partys performance in an upcoming race. But models cant explain how to create more Democrats in that district.

Maxwell won where Democrats werent even playing, in a state where Trump carried every single county. When he convinced the Humane Society to get involved against the right-to-farm measure in 2015, independent polling showed his side trailing 64 percent to 15 percent.

His decision to fight and battle plan reveal a possible path for the Democratic Party out of the political wilderness and back to electoral relevance. But taking it would require rejecting the political strategy that Democratic leaders are now honing in Washington.

Democrats dont have to throw out their values, Maxwell insists. Democrats dont even have to abandon their issues. Its about how you frame it. Its about connecting with people and showing them how your ideas fit with their values.

Alissa Scheller/The Huffington Post

Maxwell, 59, and his brother Steve run a farm in northeastern Missouri, just outside the town of Mexico, with a population of roughly 11,000. Theyre fourth-generation hog farmers, and politics wasnt a focus growing up. After stints in the Army and the U.S. Postal Service, Maxwell returned to the family business in the late 1970s, just in time for Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volckers crusade against inflation.

The Feds ruthless interest rate hikes didnt just bring down prices; they devastated small farmers, sparking a great wave of farm foreclosures across the country. When the farms failed, so did the local community banks that had loaned them money. And when the banks collapsed, so did other local businesses that relied on them for credit. Rural America was ravaged. Farmers rode tractors into Washington to snarl traffic in protest, and Maxwell decided to go into politics.

Thats when I realized that government actions pick winners and losers, he said. And theyd decided that my industry was a loser.

Maxwell began volunteering for Rep. Harold Volkmer (D-Mo.), and by 1986 he was working on the presidential campaign of Rep.Dick Gephardt (D-Mo.). He helped Gephardt organize his ultimately unsuccessful opposition to the North American Free Trade Agreement before striking out on his own. Maxwell won election first to the Missouri legislature and then as the states lieutenant governor in 2000 another year when his win bucked a bad national trend for Democrats.

Im pretty good at getting up and giving a line to people on the stump, said Wes Shoemyer, a former Missouri state senator. Me personally, Im just a good ol boy, not too sophisticated. Joe, hes a sophisticated good ol boy. And thats something the Democrats lost.

Statewide Democratic campaigns in Missouri typically set up shop in Democratic-friendly cities like St. Louis or Kansas City.Maxwell ran his campaign for lieutenant governor from his hometown, which meant he didnt have to sit through city traffic every time he set out to stump in rural Missouri. Working adjacent to a farm did have its drawbacks, however.

We were in an at-times flea-infested office, recalled Tricia Workman, a Missouri-based lobbyist who managed the campaign. I probably paid to exterminate them myself. But he campaigned on agriculture, which is the states biggest industry.

And he campaigned on health care, the working class, the middle class everybody gets a quality education, she said. And we won on that. ... Democrats used to be a lot more popular in the state.

Michael Cali for The Huffington Post

Maxwell still speaks lovingly of Jeffersonian democracy and hails Franklin Roosevelts New Deal. Theres a harmony between his attacks on corporate farm interests and the rhetorical assaults from Sen. Bernie Sanders(I-Vt.) against the 1 percent. But Maxwell and his allies arent selling democratic socialism.

We dont want government subsidies, said Fred Stokes, a Maxwell collaborator who founded the Organization for Competitive Markets, which advocates for small farms against big producers like Tyson, Perdue and Smithfield. We just want the game to be fair. Apply the damn antitrust laws and itll work. Teddy Roosevelt had this figured out 100 years ago. I dont know why its so damn hard for people to understand.

The work that Maxwell and the Humane Society of the United States are doing in rural America could serve as a foundation for further outreach. The Humane Societys battles against factory farms, puppy mills, research labs and other places that abuse animals are nonpartisan. Its advocates are Democratic and Republican alike, and its explicit political organ, the Humane Society Legislative Fund, supports candidates from both parties. But many of the alliances it has built look like the nascent stage of a new rural liberalism.

In 2010, the groups president, Wayne Pacelle, was in Jefferson City, Missouri, to lobby in favor of a state ballot proposal to crack down on puppy mills. He ran into Maxwell at the statehouse. It was a pure case of serendipity, Pacelle said.

Maxwell had backed a bill to ban cockfighting during his time in the state legislature, and hed gone after Big Ag for animal cruelty before. Pacelle hired him to direct the Humane Societys rural outreach program. Connecting with farmers as an animal welfare advocate requires overcoming some significant cultural barriers. A lot of farmers see the Humane Societys efforts against animal cruelty as a Trojan horse the first step in a project that ends with forced vegetarianism and the elimination of all animal agriculture.

What people may not realize about places like Oklahoma is, yes, there is a huge agricultural industry, mostly wheat and cattle, said F. Bailey Norwood, an agricultural economist at Oklahoma State University. But ag is also a very popular hobby. For a lot of kids growing up, their hobby was showing cattle or showing hogs. They show farm animals the way other people show dogs. So even when people dont farm for a living, theres a real connection with farm culture.

With my students, theres a lot of us-versus-them mentality, he said. Us, the good Oklahomans who raise our animals right, and them, these crazy animal rights activists and environmentalists from California who wanna tell us what to do.

Stokes, the small-farmers advocate, acknowledged thatMaxwells association with the Humane Society is a significant cultural barrier.

All of us catch a lot of hell for that, Stokes said. Theyve been conditioned by Farm Bureau and everyone else over the years to think badly about the Humane Society, when theyve been very good to us and asked for absolutely nothing in return. (The American Farm Bureau Federation is a century-old organization that advocates for the agricultural industry, but tends to represent the goals of Big Ag.)

But there is a common interest between family farmers who are routinely undercut by the market power of big meat-packing companies and animal welfare advocates who want to end brutal factory farming techniques that small farms, by definition, dont deploy. And Maxwell is getting results. Back in 2002, when he was still lieutenant governor, the Humane Society helped pass an anti-cockfighting ballot initiative in Oklahoma. But it did so by getting strong turnout in Tulsa and Oklahoma City. Initiative supporters carried only 11 of the states 77 counties. On the 2016 right-to-farm question, Maxwells side won 37.

You have to go meet them, said Maxwell, referring to voters. You have to go be where they are. Its about who they are and showing them that you are like them, that you share their values. If youre in their coffee shop or barber shop or their synagogue or their church if youre there, then they feel comfortable to express themselves. You cant do that in a poll.

The Humane Societys success at state-level politics has earned it a lot of enemies. Major food and agriculture companies hired PR guru and super-lobbyist Rick Berman to target the Humane Society with a complex propaganda operation. Berman is behind both the think-tank-sounding Center for Consumer Freedom and the blog HumaneWatch.org, which has visually caricatured Maxwell as a puppet and falsely smeared him as an animal torturer.

HSUS is a vegan organization they dont want people to ultimately eat meat,Will Coggin, research director for the Center for Consumer Freedom, claimed. If they want to be like PETA, they should be as honest as PETA is about their agenda.

This charge is, of course, impossible to square with Maxwells career as a hog farmer.

I represent Monsanto, which Joe hates, but I still have the absolute biggest respect for him that I possibly could, as a human being and as a politician, said Workman, his former campaign manager who has since returned to lobbying.

rayna via Getty Images

While Maxwell is notching victories now, any broader Democratic Party strategy for rural America would take time to pay off. But he didnt win the first one either.

In 2014, when Maxwell decided to fight a right-to-farm ballot initiative in Missouri, Big Ag had a 35-point lead. Maxwells side ended up losing the vote by a whisper-thin 0.2 percent. Former Oklahoma state Sen. Paul Muegge (D) took note. When a similar plan was introduced in Oklahoma, he called Maxwell and urged him to join the opposition campaign, which was headed by Cynthia Armstrong, the Humane Societys top operative in the state.

Right-to-farm measures come with a sympathetic label, but they benefit big agricultural conglomerates, giving them legal protections that help elbow smaller producers out of the market. The Oklahoma initiative would have amended the state constitution to make it all but impossible for the state government to regulate farming technology, either by statute or agency rules. Unless the government could demonstrate a compelling state interest an extremely high standard of legal scrutiny that also applies, for example, to restrictions on voting rights new farming rules would be forbidden. Even if the state could show a compelling interest, corporate agriculture could have used the right-to-farm law to tie up new standards in court for years.

Maxwell was tasked with everything from writing speeches to pitching farmers face-to-face on the no campaign.

The farm community is so much faith-based, I thought the idea of stewardship could really be a powerful message, Maxwell said. Stewardship of the animals, stewardship of the land.

He also saw an opening on environmental concerns, which are paramount in many portions of the state. The Illinois River, Lake Tenkiller and other waterways in eastern Oklahoma have been polluted for years, due primarily to chicken waste runoff from big poultry farms. Eastern counties broke hard for Maxwells side on election night.

I think Joes an amazing person, said Mike Callicrate, a Kansas cattle rancher who serves on the board of the Organization for Competitive Markets. And its going to be his work and his coalition-building that will save family farming and get people back to the land. That win in Oklahoma might be the turning point.

Victory builds confidence. Maxwell spent this past New Years Eve in his hometown with brother Steve and former lawmaker Shoemyer. In deep-red northeastern Missouri, one of the bars on the town square displayed a sign declaring that anyone who had voted for Hillary Clinton would not be served.

Maxwells crew took the hint and started their evening on the other side of the square. After a few rounds, his drinking buddies looked up to see him walking toward the anti-Clinton sign.

Maxwell walked in, slammed his hand down on the bar and said, I voted for Hillary Clinton and I want a beer!

Sign up for the HuffPost Must Reads newsletter. Each Sunday, we will bring you the best original reporting, long form writing and breaking news from The Huffington Post and around the web, plus behind-the-scenes looks at how its all made. Click here to sign up!

Correction: A previous version of this article stated that Trump won every voting precinct in Oklahoma. He won every county.

Read more:
While Trump Was Dominating In Deep-Red Oklahoma, This Democrat Won A Landslide - Huffington Post

Will Democrat Senators Follow Their Base Over the Cliff? – Power Line (blog)

The Democrats riled-up base is demanding that the partys senators do everything they can to block the nomination of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court:

Liberal groups that oppose Judge Neil Gorsuchs confirmation to the Supreme Court are telling Democratic senators to oppose him, or face the consequences.

The groups on Thursday formed The Peoples Defense, billed as a massive grassroots campaign to defeat Gorsuchs nomination in the Republican-controlled Senate.

Only they cant defeat his nomination.

The leaders of the efforts said in a telephone news conference that they expect Democrats to try to delay, or filibuster, Gorsuchs nomination, even if doing so provokes Republicans to try to eliminate the filibuster for high court nominations.

What was it Yoda said? There is no try. If the Democrats filibuster Gorsuch, the Republicans will do away with the filibuster for Supreme Court nominations, as has already happened for the lower federal courts.

Maybe this is inevitable. Until recently, both parties voted to confirm qualified nominees. It is hard to believe now, but Justice Scalia was confirmed on a 98-0 vote, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg by 96-3. Those days are gone. But neither party will give its opponents a veto power over Supreme Court nominations, so the filibuster is probably doomed in any event.

Anna Galland of the activist group MoveOn.org said Democrats need to catch up with the intensity we are seeing at the grass roots.

Translation: the Democrats base is crazy, and they want to see craziness from their senators in Washington. My guess is they will get what they want.

More:
Will Democrat Senators Follow Their Base Over the Cliff? - Power Line (blog)

A Democrat in Conservative Georgia Rides Opposition to Trump – New York Times


New York Times
A Democrat in Conservative Georgia Rides Opposition to Trump
New York Times
If Democrats have any hopes of recapturing the 24 seats needed to take back the House, they will depend on a lot of anti-Trump energy and underdogs like Mr. Ossoff. The race in Georgia, in a district Republicans have held for a generation, will be an ...
Tough Choices for Democrats: Obstruct or GovernRoll Call
Win or Lose, Georgia Special Election Could Embolden DemocratsThe American Prospect
Democrats Say Trump Tax Returns Are a National Security IssueNewsweek
Politico -Washington Post -Fox News
all 183 news articles »

Originally posted here:
A Democrat in Conservative Georgia Rides Opposition to Trump - New York Times

Republican state strength will withstand Democrat lawsuits – The Hill (blog)

From Barack ObamaBarack ObamaPence dodges on whether he believes Obama wiretapped Trump Tower Graham says he would subpoena for evidence on Trump wiretap claim Republican state strength will withstand Democrat lawsuits MORE and Eric HolderEric H. HolderRepublican state strength will withstand Democrat lawsuits Uber shifts into damage control mode Former Uber employee shares sexism allegations MORE to David Brock, George Soros and the Democracy Alliance, top-liberal talent and money is shifting focus to state politics.

Democrats are organizing and publicly rallying behind countless groups dedicated to spending tens of millions of dollars to win state races and impact 2020 redistricting. To fully understand the Democrats redistricting urgency, its important to first understand how we got here.

For Republicans, preparation met opportunity through the Republican State Leadership Committees (RSLC) 2010 REDistricting MAjority Project (REDMAP). Party leaders Ed Gillespie, Tom Reynolds and Karl Rove developed a national strategy which, when coupled with great candidates, effective campaigns and the failures of an overreaching Obama-led, Democrat-dominated Washington, resulted in historic-Republican gains, changing the electoral map overnight.

In 21 chambers that year, control flipped from Democrats to Republicans, and most of the districts where Republicans won in those states were drawn by Democrats.

During the last reapportionment, Republicans drew fair and competitive congressional, state and local districts a stark difference from the Democrat-redistricting dominance that hung heavy over most of the 20th century. With fair lines, Republicans won with quality candidates, better operations and a better vision for their states. Historic GOP majorities grew over the next several cycles at all levels of government. Today, Republicans control a record 69 of 99 legislative chambers with tied control in the Connecticut Senate, winning a recent special election despite being outspent.

Contrary to Democrat myth, these victories were not in magically-gerrymandered districts. In 2012, 410 Republican state legislators won in districts that Obama simultaneously carried. Since 2009, almost 1,000 state legislative seats have changed from blue to red. Additionally, Republicans now hold majorities of governors, lieutenant governors, secretaries of state, attorneys general, the United States Senate and others defined by state boundaries not impacted by redistricting. More broadly, polling has shown that nearly every state is more likely to vote Republican than it was prior to 2010.

And red states have gotten redder, with Republicans holding more than 70 percent of the legislative and statewide offices in 10 states and at least two-thirds of 20 state senates. The increasingly right-leaning political and ideological temperature of the country has moved the battlefield into purple and blue states, where were even winning control in Minnesota and Washington.

This multi-cycle trend put many formerly Democrat and competitive chambers and the U.S. House out of reach for Democrats. That helped prime the battlefront for Republicans to re-capture the U.S. Senate, and, most notably in the Great Lakes states, helped blaze the skillfully-executed path to victory by Donald TrumpDonald TrumpWash. judge upholds fines for faithless electors Is Trump throwing Ukraine to the Kremlin sharks? Republican state strength will withstand Democrat lawsuits MORE.

The Democrat response to Republicans historic success has been as predictable as it will be unsuccessful. Democrats lost control with a lack of quality candidates and good ideas. Now they resort to baseless disparagement and attempts to change the rules.

Since the last redistricting, fringe liberals and their groups, billionaires and unions have spent millions bringing legal cases which would slant the playing field unfairly towards them. Courts were asked to intervene in 42 states with over 220 cases filed in federal and state courts. Democrat press releases about the lawsuits and crocodile tears about Republican unfairness were rarely followed by coverage of their ultimate failures in court. Now, liberals are spending millions to gain control of elected court majorities themselves in key redistricting states like Pennsylvania and North Carolina.

Facing formidable opposition and liberal billionaires ready to open their checkbooks and engage, it is critical that Republicans and Independents renew and enhance their commitment to a broader, deeper, collaborative effort.

Republicans need to be prepared to effectively defend their fair lines in court and continue the good work of the RSLCs Judicial Fairness Initiative to help elect judges committed to the Constitution, not partisan politics.

We must ensure that the best data is available to drive fair and sound decisions on where lines are drawn and how legal cases are pursued. The public needs to know where Democrats may have abused their authority in states like Illinois.

Most importantly, we will need to continue supporting quality candidates with a good vision for their districts and states. We must increase support for the RSLC's Future Majority Project (FMP) and Right Women, Right Now (RWRN), which have helped elect nearly 400 new women Republicans and nearly 100 new diverse Republicans to state-level offices nationwide.

Voters judge elected officials on how well they execute the duties of their office and improve their lives. Redistricting is an important part of the process, but it is only one element. Democrat A-listers are gearing up for a state-level showdown, but the ultimate measure of American democracy is the strength of its candidates and articulation of their vision. Republicans have been winning this battle throughout the first half of this decade, and if we have the additional focus and resources, we will continue to win moving forward.

Bill McCollum is the chairman of the Republican State Leadership Committee and a former Florida Attorney General and U.S. Congressman.

Matt Walter is the president of the Republican State Leadership Committee.

The views of contributors are their own and not the views of The Hill.

See the article here:
Republican state strength will withstand Democrat lawsuits - The Hill (blog)

McCarthy: While You Weren’t Looking, the DemocratMedia Election-Hacking Narrative Just Collapsed – Fox News

That supposed FBI investigation of collusion with the Russians? Never mind . . .

By Andrew C. McCarthy, The National Review

@AndrewCMcCarthy

Theyre in retreat now. You may have missed it amid President Trumps startling Saturday tweet storm, the recriminations over president-on-candidate spying, and the Jeff Sessions recusal a whirlwind weekend. But while you werent looking, an elaborate narrative died.

For months, the media-Democrat complex has peddled a storyline that the Putin regime in Russia hacked the U.S. presidential election. There is, of course, no evidence that the election was hacked in the sense that the actual voting process was compromised. Rather, there is evidence that e-mail accounts of prominent Democrats were hacked months before the election, and thousands of those e-mails were published by WikiLeaks in the months leading up to the election.

Into this misleading Russia hacked the election narrative, the press and the Dems injected a second explosive allegation or at least an explosive suspicion that theyve wanted us to perceive as a credible allegation meriting a serious investigation. The suspicion/allegation is: Not only did Russia hack the election, but there are also enough ties between people in the Trump orbit and operatives of the Putin regime that there are grounds to believe that the Trump campaign was complicit in Russias hacking of the election.

Transparently, the aim is to undermine the legitimacy of Trumps election victory.

Finally, the third prong, without the support of which the stool would collapse: the impression that the FBI has been feverishly investigating what is said to be the Trump campaigns collusion in what is said to be the Russian hacking of the election. This reporting is designed to get you saying to yourself: Why would there be such a zealous investigation by FBI agents in addition to several other intelligence and law-enforcement agents unless there really were grave reasons to believe the shocking election-hacking conspiracy narrative?

See the original post here:
McCarthy: While You Weren't Looking, the DemocratMedia Election-Hacking Narrative Just Collapsed - Fox News