Mediaboss Marketing

WASHINGTON President Joe Biden on Friday condemned the extreme Supreme Court majority that ended a constitutional right to abortion and delivered an impassioned plea for Americans upset by the decision to vote, vote, vote vote in November. Under mounting pressure from fellow Democrats to be more forceful in response to the ruling, he signed an executive order to try to protect access to the procedure.

The actions Biden outlined are intended to head off some potential penalties that women seeking abortion may face after the ruling, but his order cannot restore access to abortion in the more than a dozen states where strict limits or total bans have gone into effect. About a dozen more states are set to impose additional restrictions.

Biden acknowledged the limitations facing his office, saying it would require an act of Congress to restore nationwide access to the way it was before the June 24 decision.

The fastest way to restore Roe is to pass a national law, Biden said. The challenge is go out and vote. For Gods sake there is an election in November!

Bidens action formalized instructions to the Departments of Justice and Health and Human Services to push back on efforts to limit the ability of women to access federally approved abortion medication or to travel across state lines to access clinical abortion services. He was joined by Vice President Kamala Harris, HHS secretary Xavier Becerra and Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco in the Roosevelt Room as he signed the order.

His executive order also directs agencies to work to educate medical providers and insurers about how and when they are required to share privileged patient information with authorities an effort to protect women who seek or obtain abortion services. He is also asking the Federal Trade Commission to take steps to protect the privacy of those seeking information about reproductive care online and establish a task force to coordinate federal efforts to safeguard access to abortion.

Biden is also directing his staff to line up volunteer lawyers to provide women and providers with pro bono legal assistance to help them navigate new state restrictions.

The order comes as Biden has faced criticism from some in his own party for not acting with more urgency to protect womens access to abortion. The courts decision in the case known as Dobbs v. Jackson Womens Health Organization overturned the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling.

Since the decision, Biden has stressed that his ability to protect abortion rights by executive action is limited without congressional action, and stressed that Democrats do not have the votes in the current Congress to do so.

We need two additional pro-choice senators and a pro-choice house to codify Roe, he said. Your vote can make that a reality.

Biden for the first time last week announced his support for changing Senate rules to allow a measure to restore nationwide access to abortion to pass by simple majority, rather than the usual 60-vote threshold required to end a filibuster. However, at least two Democratic lawmakers have made clear they wont support changing Senate rules.

He predicted that women would turn out in record numbers in frustration over the courts decision, and said he expected millions and millions of men will be taking up the fight beside them.

On Friday, he repeated his sharp criticism of the Supreme Courts reasoning in striking down what had been a half-century constitutional right to abortion.

Lets be clear about something from the very start, this was not a decision driven by the Constitution, Biden said. He accused the courts majority of playing fast and loose with the facts.

He spoke emotionally of a 10-year-old Ohio girl reported to have been forced to travel out of state to terminate a pregnancy after being raped, noting that some states have instituted abortion bans that dont have exceptions for cases of rape or incest.

A 10-year- old should be forced to give birth to a rapists child! an incredulous Biden nearly shouted. I cant think of anything more extreme.

Biden added that in the November congressional lections, The choice we face as a nation is between the mainstream or the extreme.

His directions to the Justice Department and HHS push the agencies to fight in court to protect women, but the order conveys no guarantees that the judicial system will take their side against potential prosecution by states that have moved to outlaw abortion.

NARAL Pro-Choice America President Mini Timmaraju called Bidens order an important first step in restoring the rights taken from millions of Americans by the Supreme Court.

But Lawrence Gostin, who runs the ONeill Institute for National and Global Health at Georgetown Law, described Bidens plans as underwhelming.

Theres nothing that I saw that would affect the lives of ordinary poor women living in red states, he said.

Gostin encouraged Biden to take a more forceful approach toward ensuring access to medication abortion across the country and said Medicaid should consider covering transportation to other states for the purposes of getting abortions.

Chiquita Brooks-LaSure, administrator of the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, told the AP that the agency was looking at how Medicaid could cover travel for abortions, along with a range of other proposals, but acknowledged that Medicaids coverage of abortion is extremely limited.

Susan B. Anthony Pro-Life America President Marjorie Dannenfelser condemned Bidens order, saying, President Biden has once again caved to the extreme abortion lobby, determined to put the full weight of the federal government behind promoting abortion.

Bidens move was the latest scramble to protect the data privacy of those contemplating or seeking abortion, as regulators and lawmakers reckon with the aftermath of the Supreme Court ruling.

Privacy experts say women could be vulnerable if their personal data is used to surveil pregnancies and shared with police or sold to vigilantes. Online searches, location data, text messages and emails, and even apps that track periods could be used to prosecute people who seek an abortion or medical care for a miscarriage as well as those who assist them, experts say.

Privacy advocates are watching for possible new moves by law enforcement agencies in affected states serving subpoenas, for example, on tech companies such as Google, Apple, Bing, Facebooks Messenger and WhatsApp, services like Uber and Lyft, and internet service providers including AT&T, Verizon, T-Mobile and Comcast. Local prosecutors may go before sympathetic judges to obtain search warrants for users data.

Last month four Democratic lawmakers asked the FTC to investigate Apple and Google for allegedly deceiving millions of mobile phone users by enabling the collection and sale of their personal data to third parties.

___

AP writers Aamer Madhani, Marcy Gordon and Hillary Powell contributed to this report.

Here is the original post:
Impassioned Biden signs order on abortion access - Woodland Daily Democrat

On Thursday, Kunce released a very effective ad that centers reproductive rights and womens rightswhile also pointing out the hypocrisy of thearchaic toxic masculinity promoted as a virtue by conservatives. This is the kind of messaging the Democratic Party needs to get on board for.

He opens with: Im Lucas Kunce and I have a message for Americas men: Step the hell up! Throughout the advertisement, a hard rock guitar riff plays, reminiscent of penis-pill advertisements one sees and hears during sporting event broadcasts. Its sort of superb. From there he talks about how reproductive rights and childrens rights are being taken away and conservative men are flexing their muscles by standing on the sidelines, acting powerless.

He also connects the fact that he was a Marine in Afghanistan and Iraq, being told how he was fighting for the human rights of women in other countries, only to come home to a far more tyrannous Republican-led movement at home.

The video even gives a nice visual shoutout to weak leaders like Sen. Joe Manchin, who has pretended he has no power as a sitting U.S. senator. Kunce also pounds home the middle-American masculinity fallacy implicit in the pro-life movement.Real men fight for choice, the screen readsas Kunce gives his very simple message to voters: Thats why Im running for Senate. In Washington I will kill the filibuster and codify Roe v.Wade.

Ive heard enough!

x

I've got a message for America's men about abortion. pic.twitter.com/bJItUvSx2x

Privacy as a foundational value in a post-Roe landscape on Daily Kos' The Brief podcast

x

RELATED STORIES:

Disgraced ex-Missouri governor running for Senate faces another round of appalling allegations

Greitens campaign off to a great start after conservative hosts asks about half-rape allegation

Donald Trump Jr. and alleged wife abuser Eric Greitens release video praising shooting of liberals

See the article here:
The fall of Roe affects everyone, and this Missouri Democrat wants men to 'Step the hell up!' - Daily Kos

A new abortion poll from the American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AAPLOG) out Wednesday illuminates how media and abortion activists are able to skew public opinion by keeping people in the dark about the practice. Once Americans understand the grisly details and what Roe v. Wade really entailed, their opinions change dramatically.

For instance, while the pro-abortion media routinely tout Roe as majority-supported, more than half of the poll respondents opposed Roe v. Wade once they learned it allowed for late-term abortions.

Fifty-three percent said they support, versus 31 percent who opposed, Roe v. Wade when it was presented to them as the keystone to recognizing abortion as a so-called constitutional right, which is the lefts framing of the issue. But when participants learned Roe allowed for late-term abortions, when unborn babies can feel pain, those numbers reversed and then some: 56 percent said they opposed Roe v. Wade, and only 28 percent supported it.

The trend of participants switching positions once they knew more facts continued throughout the poll. When asked if they supported or opposed late-term abortions, seventy-four percent of Republicans opposed compared to only 36 percent of Democrats. Almost half the Democrats surveyed said they support late-term abortions.

However, once participants were asked if a fetus counts as a human life when it has a heartbeat at six weeks, begins to move its eyes at 12 weeks, or can feel pain at 14 weeks, the Democrat position on late-term abortion shifted. Fifty-nine percent of respondents, including 49 percent of Democrats, now said they support abortion bans if there is an indication of life.

Sixty-eight percent of participants thought a fetus is a human life once it has a heartbeat at six weeks. And once they were reminded a fetus has a unique DNA blueprint as soon as sperm meets egg, a whopping 66 percent said a fetus is a human life at conception. After answering questions about the humanity of unborn children, 55 percent of respondents said abortions should be prohibited between 0 and 6 weeks gestation.

Its clear to see how public opinion changes where knowledge about human life and development increases, but left-wing activists and media have a vested interest in hiding the cruel realities of abortion from Americans. After all, the abortion lobby, led by the likes of Planned Parenthood, capitalizes on this ignorance. They have fought ultrasound requirements for years to keep women from seeing the undeniable baby boys or girls growing in their wombs and are now promoting the chemical abortion pill as a safe, easy way to simply undo a pregnancy, despite the grave danger it poses to women, another fact the poll highlighted.

These polls are really important as they show what people think once theyve been educated, AAPLOG CEO-elect Dr. Christina Francis, a board-certified OB/GYN, said in a press meeting on Wednesday.

When it comes to abortion, Americans ignorance is the lefts bliss.

Beth Whitehead is an intern at The Federalist and a journalism major at Patrick Henry College where she fondly excuses the excess amount of coffee she drinks as an occupational hazard.

See the original post here:
Look How Opinion Shifts On Abortion When Polls Reject Leftist Framing - The Federalist

Earlier this year, I co-authored apiecefor TheWall Street Journalthat argued that a perfect storm in the Democratic Party is making a once unfathomable scenario a comeback for Hillary Clinton in 2024 highly plausible.

Our reasoning was that President Bidenslow approval rating, doubt about his capacity to run again, Vice President Harrissunpopularity, and the absence of another strong Democrat to lead the ticket have created a leadership vacuum within the party that only Clinton as an experienced and politically savvy change candidate can fill.

In light of the Supreme Courts decision to overturn Roe v. Wade upending decades of precedent and revoking a constitutional right that American women have enjoyed for half a century the case for Clintons candidacy is even clearer.

Regardless of ones own political affiliation or opinion of Clinton, the country knows her as an experienced politician and a champion of womens rights. From her declaration at the United Nations in 1995 that womens rights are human rights to being the first woman nominated as a major partys candidate for president in 2016, she offers the exact type of leadership that the Democratic Party desperately needs.

Whether or not party leaders will admit it, Democrats know that they need to move on from Biden if they want to stay in the White House in 2024 and even more importantly have a fighting chance at building a sufficient enough majority in Congress to advance any element of their agenda going forward, including, and especially, codifying abortion rights.

Put another way, the stakes are simply too high for Democrats to remain on this slowly sinking ship.

Democrats are headed for a blowout loss in November, even worse than in1994 and 2010 the two worst midterm election years for the party in recent history when they lost53 and 63 seats, respectively, per Gallups analysis of four key national mood indicators.

Indeed, Bidens approval rating is lower than both Obamas and Clintons at the same points in their presidencies, and Americans in 2022 are less satisfied with the direction of the country, more negative about the economy and more disapproving of Congress.

Polls generally show Republicans with a lead of at least 2 or 3 points in the 2022 generic vote for Congress. This advantage would likely give the GOP a solid majority in the House considering the favorable Republican rulings in redistricting litigation in key states as well as the likelihood that Republican turnout will be even higher than most pollsters are currently accounting for.

While Biden was the right person to defeat former President Trump in 2020, he is clearly not the right person to lead the Democratic Party going forward as only 36 percent of Democrats believe that Biden gives them the best chance to win the presidency in 2024, perrecent polling.

To be sure, Democrats confidence in Biden will only decline further after the party experiences a shellacking in the midterm elections. These voters will be looking for a change candidate who is experienced, effective, savvy and committed to the issues they care most about namely, womens rights and civil rights.

At that point, Clinton will have a unique opportunity to position herself as an experienced candidate capable of leading Democrats on a more successful path who will also fight as she has done her entire career for womens rights.

As John Elliswrotethis week, The Supreme Courts decision to overturn Roe vs. Wade creates the opening for Hillary Clinton to get out of stealth mode and start down the path toward declaring her candidacy for the 2024 Democratic presidential nomination.

Based on her latest public statements, its clear that Clinton not only recognizes her position as a potential front-runner but also is setting up a process to gauge whether or not she should pursue the presidency once more.

Repositioning herself in the national spotlight, Clinton spoke this week at the Aspen Ideas Festival andbashedthe overturning of Roe v. Wade as the most arrogant misreading of history in law that you could ever find and a decision that is rolling the clock back on our civil rights, our human rights.

Moreover, in a separate interview earlier in the week, Clintonrefusedto rule out a 2024 run.

Aside from Clinton, the Democratic Party lacks any other rising stars who could take the torch from Biden if he chooses not to run and win in a general election. The most natural successor would be Harris. However, Harris is even more unpopular than Biden and would almost guarantee a Republican victory in 2024.

Further, Harriss response to Roebeing overturned missed the mark, as she was widelycriticizedfor trying to make the case that abortion access will greatly impact Americas sons.

Ultimately, Clinton is the only prominent Democrat with the experience, the campaign infrastructure, the political know-how and the proven track record who can win a general election.

As Fox News Channels Juan Williamswrote earlier this week, Democrats need a strong voice ready to fight to restore womens rights, now that the Supreme Court has struck down Roe v. Wade. Theres only one Hillary Clinton.

If Democrats want a chance at winning the presidency in 2024, Clinton is now more than ever their best chance.

Douglas E. Schoen is a political consultant who served as an adviser to former President Clinton and to the 2020 presidential campaign of Michael Bloomberg. He is the author of The End of Democracy? Russia and China on the Rise and America in Retreat.

Continued here:
Now more than ever, Democrats need Hillary Clinton - The Hill

ROCK HALL, Md. When Dave Harden decided to run for Congress as a Democrat on Marylands conservative Eastern Shore, a friend gave him a piece of free advice.

Democrats lose on three things: abortion, guns and regulations, the friend said. If you keep one, you have to give up the other two.

Abortion and gun rights have both inspired passionate activism and countless front-page news articles. Regulations not so much. Yet nitpicky government rules remain a potent and underappreciated source of populist anger against Democrats, especially in rural areas.

On the campaign trail, Mr. Harden has gotten an earful from voters about maddening and arbitrary restrictions: Why are wineries in Maryland limited to serving only 13 kinds of food? Why does a woman who sells her grandmothers cobbler have to cough up tens of thousands of dollars to build a commercial kitchen? Why does a federal inspector have to be on hand to watch wild catfish get gutted but not other kinds of seafood? The short answer is that restaurant associations tend to wield more political clout than wineries, and catfish farmers in Mississippi are more powerful than seafood harvesters in Maryland. Big businesses can afford to hire lawyers to help them cut through red tape and lobbyists to bend government rules to their will. Small businesses, especially in rural places, get slammed.

The claim of overregulation is especially animating on the political right, Joshua Sewell of Taxpayers for Common Sense told me. He said misleading rumors that the Environmental Protection Agency planned to regulate farm dust or that President Bidens Build Back Better plan would have taxed belching cows played right into the stereotype of Democrats as city folk who were infuriatingly eager to regulate almost anything in rural America.

In 2006, Democrats and Republicans had similar views on government regulation of business: About 40 percent of Republicans said there was too much, compared to about 36 percent of Democrats. But the percentage of Republicans who felt that way climbed steadily under President Barack Obama, who enacted more economically significant rules than his predecessors. By the end of his first term, 84 percent of Republicans thought that government meddled too much in business, while only 22 percent of Democrats agreed, according to Gallup. Democrats were more likely to say that the government doesnt regulate businesses enough.

With business owners more likely to be Republicans and government workers more likely to be Democrats, you have the makings of a yawning partisan divide. Donald Trump campaigned on a promise to remove two rules for every new one that was put in place.

Mr. Harden must first win a July 19 primary against Heather Mizeur, a progressive herb farmer who once represented Montgomery County, a much more urban area, in the state legislature. Ms. Mizeur has more money and name recognition than Mr. Harden, but he believes he has a chance because she seems out of step with the conservative district, which is considered a safe Republican seat.

Mr. Harden is trying to chart an alternative path for Democrats in rural areas. Hes no fan of Donald Trump. He left a 22-year career in the Foreign Service in 2018 because he didnt want to serve the Trump administration. But when it comes to regulations, Mr. Harden doesnt sound all that much different from Mr. Trump.

The regulations in rural economies are ridiculous, he told me.

Mr. Harden is trying to walk a difficult line, appealing to voters who are angry about government overreach without turning off the Democratic base. He says he doesnt oppose reasonable environmental regulations, but he rails against rules that make it harder for small businesses to survive.

Its a message that comes naturally to him. He spent years trying to improve the business environments in Iraq and the Palestinian territories as a senior U.S.A.I.D. official. He led a program in the West Bank town of Jenin that opened up a border crossing with Israel and prevailed on the Israeli government to allow more Israeli cars into Jenin so that Israeli Arabs could shop there, helping to start an economic revival.

Mr. Harden is now trying to bring those lessons home to Maryland, where he grew up. On a recent Saturday, he squinted out at Chesapeake Bay, riffing about how to promote local economic development with Capt. Rob Newberry, the head of the Delmarva Fisheries Association, which represents licensed watermen in the area. Captain Newberry is a Republican who once hung a sign cursing Joe Biden on his boat. But he supports Mr. Harden, who listens patiently to his complaints about regulations.

Captain Newberry represents people who harvest crabs, Marylands renowned cuisine, from the Chesapeake Bay, and he complains that excessive regulations are putting watermen like him out of business. He contends that the roughly 1,800 fishermen, clammers, crabbers and oystermen in his association are among the most highly regulated workers in the state.

When you get halfway to work and you pull up at a stoplight, does a policeman pull you over? he asked. When you get into work, does he come in and bother you two or three times and ask you what are you doing, do you have a license? That happens to me every time I go out on the harbor.

Captain Newberry has grievances with people across the political spectrum: with the environmentalists who lobby for more restrictions on the watermen; with the cities and companies responsible for faulty wastewater treatment systems and runoff that pollutes the bay; and with Mr. Harris, the incumbent.

He told me that Mr. Harris refused to speak out against a nonsensical regulation that stipulated that catfish had to be treated like meat under federal law. The rule, which advantages catfish farmers in states like Mississippi at the expense of foreign fish farmers and Maryland fishermen, requires federal inspectors to be on site when catfish get gutted, even though theres little evidence of a risk to public health.

The rule is so outrageous that the Government Accountability Office once called for it to be repealed. Yet it remains in place. When the watermen complained to their congressman, Mr. Harris arranged for the government to pay for the inspectors. But inspectors still have to be called in whenever a fisherman brings in catfish for processing. (Mr. Harriss office said hes still working on it.)

Captain Newberry says he has become disillusioned with the political sausage-making behind government rules. But he still works within the system to try to change them. He testifies before lawmakers and serves on committees, hoping that it will make a difference.

However, those same frustrations have led some other watermen to fall under the sway of the sovereign citizens movement, which preaches that the federal and state governments have no right to require licenses for hunting, driving or owning a gun. Some adherents believe that the local sheriff is the only legitimate authority under the Constitution. Beliefs about the illegitimacy of the federal government appeared to be at the root of an armed standoff between federal authorities and cattle ranchers in Nevada in 2014.

Marylands Eastern Shore hasnt seen anything like that, Somerset Countys sheriff, Ronald Howard, told me. But he said he has faced mounting pressure to defy state rules and allow watermen to harvest oysters from sanctuaries that have been declared off limits. He refused. I said, Look, if I interfere, thats obstruction of my duties; I can be charged criminally, he told me. I had one waterman tell me, Thats a chance youve got to take.

Sheriff Howard doesnt blame the watermen; he blames the rigid rules made by politicians who rarely take the time to listen to rural people. Thats where Dave Harden sees an opening for himself, however slim.

Democrats have to find a way to reconnect with rural America, Mr. Harden told me. Frank talk about regulations is a good place to start.

The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. Wed like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And heres our email: letters@nytimes.com.

Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.

More here:
Opinion | The Democrat Whos Flipping the Campaign Script - The New York Times