Rep. Brandon Dillon Opposes EAA Expansion – Video
Rep. Brandon Dillon Opposes EAA Expansion
Rep. Brandon Dillon speaks in opposition to HB 4369 which expands the EAA Statewide.
By: Michigan House Democrats
Continue reading here:
Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category
Rep. Theresa Abed Speaks Against EAA Expansion – Video
Rep. Theresa Abed Speaks Against EAA Expansion
Rep. Theresa Abed speaks in opposition to HB 4369 which expands the EAA Statewide.
By: Michigan House Democrats
Go here to read the rest:
Democrats Drop IMF Provision From Ukraine Aid Bill
Democrats have dropped reforms to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) from legislation to provide aid to Ukraine, clearing its way for Senate passage.
Senate Democratic leaders acceded to Republican objections over including IMF reforms as part of the Ukraine legislation. GOP leaders had griped that the IMF provisions were unrelated to Ukraine aid; Democrats countered by arguing the reforms would give the IMF greater flexibility to lend its own assistance to Ukraine.
Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., had considered dropping the provision earlier Tuesday; the standoff had stalled debate over Ukrainian assistance by two weeks. Reid suggested after party luncheons that he had come to agree with Secretary of State John Kerry that expediting the aid package was a top priority.
"I cannot believe House Republicans will not put national security interests above their partisan political interest," Sen. Robert Menendez, chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, said a short while later on the Senate floor. But Menendez also acknowledged moving forward a package with IMF reforms was untenable.
Reid said the Senate will vote on a revised Ukraine bill without the IMF language on Thursday.
The House has already passed its own legislation.
First published March 25 2014, 12:48 PM
Read more here:
Democrats chide Nate Silver for predicting a GOP Senate takeover
The campaign committee for Senate Democrats is none too pleased with an analysis by poll-watcher Nate Silver that says the Republicans are "slight favorites" to win at least the six seats necessary to take control of the Senate during the 2014 midterms.
Silver's prediction isn't unique in calling a Republican takeover a reality, it's his methodology that is. In response, Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) executive Director Guy Cecil put out a memo noting the scarcity of polls on which Silver bases his work, and pointing out past races for which a lack of information has led to incorrect predictions.
On Sunday, Silver offered his prediction in a long article on his website, http://www.FiveThirtyEight.com, based on a variety of factors: the national environment, candidate quality, state partisanship, incumbency, and head-to-head polls. In an appearance on ABC's "This Week," he put the odds of a GOP takeover at about 60 percent.
"The Democrats' position has deteriorated somewhat since last summer, with President Obama's approval ratings down to 42 or 43 percent from an average of about 45 percent before. Furthermore, as compared with 2010 or 2012, the GOP has done a better job of recruiting credible candidates, with some exceptions," he writes.
The Democrat-held seats he said were most likely to change to Republican hands are West Virginia, South Dakota, Montana and Arkansas. Four other seats he rates as a toss-up: Louisiana, North Carolina, Alaska and Michigan. Silver also says that there is a "plausible" chance of a GOP pickup in Colorado, Iowa and New Hampshire.
Though Cecil conceded that Silver and his team were doing "groundbreaking work," he notes that more than half of available polls come from Republican shops. "In August, of 2012, Silver forecasted a 61 percent likelihood that Republicans would pick up enough seats to claim the majority. Three months later Democrats went on to win 55 seats," he wrote.
Cecil goes on to highlight two specific races where polls pointed in the wrong direction: Silver predicted that Sen. Heidi Heitkamp, D-N.D., had just an 8 percent chance of winning and Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., had just a 34 percent chance of getting reelected. In 2010, Silver also predicted that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., only had a 16 percent chance of beating tea party favorite Sharron Angle. Heitkamp, Tester and Reid are all in office.
"We don't minimize the challenges ahead. Rather, we view the latest projection as a reminder that we have a challenging map and important work still to do in order to preserve our majority," Cecil wrote in the memo. He also said that most Democratic candidates are beating their opponents on metrics like polling, fundraising and campaigning despite well-funded attacks from "special interests like the Koch brothers [and] the Tea Party."
"It's clear that Republican Senate candidates, even candidates favored by Washington insiders, are pandering to the far right and embracing the reckless and irresponsible agenda of the Koch Brothers that will prove costly in a general election. Democrats have strong incumbents, great recruits in Michigan, Iowa, West Virginia and Montana, and are playing offense in Kentucky, Georgia, and Mississippi," he said.
2014 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Go here to see the original:
Democrats chide Nate Silver for predicting a GOP Senate takeover
Why The Democrats' Koch Brothers Fixation?
hide captionDemocrats say they're focused on the Koch brothers because, they allege, Republican candidates are doing the billionaires' bidding. Republicans say Democrats are desperate. David Koch (above) is chairman of Americans for Prosperity.
Democrats say they're focused on the Koch brothers because, they allege, Republican candidates are doing the billionaires' bidding. Republicans say Democrats are desperate. David Koch (above) is chairman of Americans for Prosperity.
Another day, another wave of Democratic attacks on the Koch brothers and their Republican allies.
Sen. Harry Reid, the Democratic majority leader, took to the Senate floor Monday to bash the Koch brothers and the GOP, as has become his habit in recent weeks.
In his latest criticism, he accused Republicans of stalling aid to beleaguered Ukraine until Democrats agreed to delay new Internal Revenue Service rules that would affect the political activities of nonprofit groups.
"Republicans delayed this aid package for 10 days in order to protect the Koch brothers and billionaires just like them," Reid said. Reid didn't cite the nonprofit, Koch-brothers-funded group Americans for Prosperity, but that's what he meant.
Another Democratic attack on Charles and David Koch came from a different direction. American Bridge 21st Century, the opposition research group, weighed in with a new Web ad that accused AFP and the Kochs of misleading voters via untrue attacks on vulnerable Senate Democrats up for re-election.
That ad followed news that another independent Democratic group intends to spend $3 million on anti-Koch ads in the several states where Democrats are thought to be most at risk.
Why do Democrats seem to be so fixated on the Koch brothers? First, the Koch brothers are arguably good for fundraising. Dave Weigel of Salon reported that Democratic email pitches that mentioned the Koch brothers generated more donations than those that didn't.
But Democrats said it wasn't really about the Kochs being good for Democratic fundraising pitches (though there's nothing wrong with that). The additional amounts raised are trivial compared with the estimated $30 million AFP has already spent, they said.
Visit link: