Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

Democrats seek to keep slim majority in Michigan State Board of Trustees election. Heres whos running. – MLive.com

EAST LANSING, MI - Democrats seek to hold a 5-3 majority on the Michigan State University Board of Trustees. A pair of Republicans seek to draw even on Nov. 8.

There are seven candidates running for the two open seats decided by statewide voters in the Nov. 8 general election.

Democrat Renee Knake Jefferson is the lone incumbent running, as she seeks to defend the seat that Gov. Gretchen Whitmer appointed her to in December 2019 to replace former Henry Ford Health Systems CEO Nancy Schlichting.

Incumbent Republican Melanie Foster is not running for reelection.

Jefferson, a professor of law at University of Houston, is joined by small business owner and former Michigan State Legislature staffer Dennis Deno on the Democratic ticket. Denos firm Deno Research works on political and marketing analysis.

The Republican ticket consists of commercial real estate broker and former U.S. Navy officer Mike Balow, as well as orthopedic surgeon Travis Menge.

Retired Michigan Department of Health and Human Services worker Claranna Gelinau and former Muskegon County public school teacher Max Rieske are running as Libertarians. Robin Lea Laurain is running for the Green Party.

Click here: 2022 Michigan voter guide by MLive and the League of Women Voters

MLive/The Ann Arbor News partnered with the nonpartisan League of Women Voters of Michigan to provide candidate information for readers. Each candidate was asked to outline their stances on a variety of public policy issues, with the contested races listed below.

Information on other state, county and local primary races can be found at Vote411.org.

All responses in the voter guide were submitted directly by the candidate and have not been edited by the League of Women Voters, except for necessary cut if a reply exceeded character limitations. Spelling and grammar were not corrected. Publication of candidate statements and opinions is solely in the interest of public service and should NOT be considered as an endorsement. The League never supports or opposes any candidates or political parties.

An sign at one edge of the Michigan State University campus on Monday, Aug. 17, 2020 in East Lansing. (Jake May | MLive.com)Jake May | Mlive.com

Describe your qualifications and the skills and experience you bring to the position. Why do you want to serve on this university board?

Jefferson: Governor Whitmer appointed me to the MSU Board of Trustees in 2019. She chose me based on my expertise as an attorney and professor in legal ethics and gender equity. I served on the MSU law faculty for a decade from 2006-16, and continue to reside in East Lansing. My husband and step-son are proud Spartan graduates. I believe education should be affordable, accessible, and inclusive. I value academic freedom, campus safety/healing, civility, diversity, equity, respect, sustainability and transparency. I have been a champion of change to further these values at Michigan State, and hope to continue my efforts for the next eight years.

Balow: I have been in business for over 20 years and also had a wonderful experience serving as a U.S. Naval Officer for seven years at locations around the globe. The leadership skills and perseverance I learned in this position were invaluable toward my development as a leader and manager. I was raised in a very middle-class household, and I have never forgotten where Ive come from, which helps me relate to people from all sorts of socioeconomic backgrounds. I will put the core educational needs of our young men and women first and foremost, and everything else second. I am the only candidate who has a son or daughter who also attends MSU.

Deno: As a small business owner, former staffer in the Michigan legislature, MSU graduate and someone who lives a mile from campus, I see the positives and negatives of MSU Board of Trustees decisions. To get anything done, Trustees must put politics aside and build a consensus and also ask how their decisions affect the MSU community and the entire state. The number one job of the MSU Board is to serve as the fiduciary agent for our tax dollars and I want to use my business and political experience and community relations to ensure that MSUs budget reflects our priorities.

Menge: My healthcare leadership experience makes me uniquely qualified to successfully guide MSU through unexpected challenges, such as the COVID pandemic and Larry Nassar Scandal. Additionally, up to 15-20% of the annual budget ($1.4 Billion) at MSU is related to medical education, health sciences, and research. The MSU Trustees provide supervision over the university and its funds, but do not have a member with healthcare experience when addressing these issues. I received a scholarship to attend MSU, and want to utilize my experience to give back and serve the university that has provided so much to me. Go Green!

What are the two most pressing issues facing this university today, and what is your position on those issues?

Balow: There are more than two pressing issues facing MSU today. As Ive stated, weve priced college out of many families budgets, students are graduating with too much debt, and they are on campuses which arent always focused on getting them through with a meaningful degree in four years. Universities are wonderful places of research as well, but we must always be mindful of their core mission: educating our young men and women and making them productive citizens of this great country. If students are graduating and have difficulty finding employment and paying back their loans, thats a fail.

Jefferson: There are several issues that I would rank as the most pressing for MSU today. Priorities for me include: (1) enhanced accountability and transparency in Board governance; (2) meaningful diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging; (3) improved campus safety and healing, especially for survivors of sexual violence and misconduct; (4) affordable tuition and living costs, in particular for in-state students; and (5) increased educational and economic opportunities for all 83 of Michigans counties through MSUs Extension Program.

Menge: Higher education and healthcare share many similar issues. I believe two of the most pressing issues facing MSU are the value of education offered and accessibility for students.Many people simply talk about cost, but I believe improving the value of education is more important. Value takes into account both the cost AND quality. I want to make high quality education affordable and lower costs, thereby offering the best value to students.Accessibility is also an issue facing students across Michigan. I want to ensure students from all backgrounds have the opportunity to obtain a world class education at Michigan State University.

Deno: Transparency and safety. As a public body, the MSU Board must be more transparent with their decisions and budget process. The other big concern is safety--do our students, employees, and guests feel safe on campus? Is MSU a safe place for everyone? If students do not feel safe then they will not succeed academically, and if employees do not feel safe then they will not stay at MSU.

What would you recommend to make university education more accessible to all Michigans residents?

Deno: Every candidate is going to say that they are going to fight to lower tuition, but we all know that they cant, thanks to cuts from the federal and state government. I would first like to examine our budget and see where our finances are coming from and going and if there are cost savings. More grant money would be great, but also increasing all salaries on campus to $15 an hour would help students pay their bills.

Menge: Improving accessibility to a high quality education at MSU is very important to me. I grew up on a cattle ranch in northwestern Colorado, and attended high school in a rural Wyoming town of less than 400 people. Without the scholarship I received to Michigan State, I never could have dreamed of (or afforded) to come to Michigan and attend school at MSU.I will work to ensure opportunities are available for Michigan students from every background to earn both merit-based and needs-based scholarships. We need to leverage our corporate and industry partnerships to further expand funding sources, and make better use of our taxpayer dollars.

Jefferson: Making education truly accessible to all Michigan residents requires more than keeping tuition affordable, though that is important. Pipeline programs starting in elementary school and extending through high school are essential to helping our youngest residents access higher education. MSU does this through the Extension program and other outreach efforts, but more can and should be done to help make university education a realistic option for anyone who wants to pursue it. In addition to K-12 pipeline programs, I recommend targeted outreach to first-generation university students and special support for them as they enter higher education.

Balow: In order to make university education more accessible to all Michigan students, I would focus on cost and outcomes. First, any student who would like to attend MSU, and is qualified, should be able to attend and graduate with minimal debt. Some debt is fine, but graduating with a mortgage payment is not acceptable, and probably dissuades some from getting a college degree. I would also strengthen partnerships with community colleges, trade schools, and certificate programs, so that credits are easily transferred in, should a student want to transfer to MSU.

Read more from MLive:

President hasnt been threatened with ultimatum or termination, MSU board members say

Review finds weaknesses with how MSU certifies reviews of Title IX reports

Michigan State University board in contract discussions with school president

See the rest here:
Democrats seek to keep slim majority in Michigan State Board of Trustees election. Heres whos running. - MLive.com

Arizona Democrats hope to flip the governor’s mansion, but Katie Hobbs has some worried – ABC News

Arizona Democrats headed into the 2022 midterm races with a head full of steam, hoping to cement the state's newfound battleground status after a string of recent successes.

Mark Kelly's win in a special Senate election and Joe Biden's presidential victory in the state in 2020, after Kyrsten Sinema clinched her own seat in 2018 had, together, elevated the prospect that 2022 would be the year the party flipped the governor's mansion, too.

Instead, the FiveThirtyEight polling average shows Democratic gubernatorial nominee Katie Hobbs, the secretary of state, statistically deadlocked with former broadcast journalist Kari Lake, her Republican rival.

"I think there's a legitimate concern about it. There's a lot of money being poured into this race, the dynamics between the candidates are shaky and there's some weaknesses there. But I still have hope that we can pull it off at the end," said state Sen. Martin Quezada, a Democrat who is running for state treasurer.

The Grand Canyon State was until recently a Republican redoubt, and Democratic voter registration trails that of Republicans and unaffiliated voters, making a slog out of the race to replace term-limited Republican Gov. Doug Ducey.

Arizona Republican nominee for governor Kari Lake greets the audience during a stop on her Ask Me Anything Tour at American Way Market, Sept. 20, 2022, in Chandler, Ariz.

Rebecca Noble/Getty Images

But Democrats had been optimistic about Hobbs' statewide experience and what they saw as vulnerabilities for Lake in the general campaign given her alliance with Donald Trump and hardline policies, including on election denialism and restricting abortions. (Lake, who also campaigns on immigration, the economy and fighting progressives, has sometimes wielded a sledgehammer at events -- claiming it's for suspect electronic voting machines.)

"We have to take the governorship. Otherwise, we will be a fascist state," argued Pima County Democratic Party Chairwoman Bonnie Heidler. "What's disconcerting is how close it is."

Fueling the race's competitiveness, strategists said, is the tight nature of Arizona politics: Democrats' recent successes shouldn't hide the purple state's historically red hue.

Beyond that, some Democrats are wringing their hands over Hobbs' candidacy and the way that they say she comes across on the stump -- worries that Hobbs and others in the party forcefully reject.

Hobbs seized the spotlight in 2020 with her vociferous defense of Arizona's voting system against a barrage of baseless fraud accusations led by Trump and other Republicans. While that heightened profile helped her sail through the Democratic primary, some operatives question her presence on the trail compared with Lake.

Women candidates often face a harsher -- even sexist -- spotlight on so-called personality concerns during campaigns, these strategists concede, though Hobbs has had a lighter in-person schedule than both Lake and other Democrats on the ballot: She has opted to hold smaller gatherings and fewer press availabilities than Lake, who organizes large rallies and engages, albeit combatively, with the press.

"There's a lack of charisma," contended one Arizona Democratic strategist who was granted anonymity to frankly discuss the race. "And I think it's a challenge on their end because they're not confident when they go out so, their response to that is to try and do as little publicly as possible and try to sail to the finish line. And the ramifications of that are not everybody seeing you be visible."

Hobbs' refusal to debate Lake serves as a microcosm of that dynamic.

Hobbs and Lake were negotiating the terms of a possible face-off before Hobbs walked away earlier this month, warning that engaging with Lake would devolve into spectacle.

"Missing that was an error. I think a lot of the reasoning around that was 'oh, well, she's just gonna say crazy stuff anyway, let's not give her the platform,'" the strategist said. "But what happened with that was voters missed out on seeing them next to each other, they missed out on seeing Hobbs be the adult in the room and Kari be bombastic."

Some Republicans agree.

"Power Trip" follows 7 young reporters as they chase down candidates in the lead up to the midterms with George Stephanopoulos guiding them along the way.

"If Kari Lake wants to rant and rave for an hour on stage, then voters would see that and then make their own decisions," Barrett Marson, a GOP strategist in Arizona who isn't working with Lake, told ABC News. He added: "She's gonna be able to use this unfettered access to voters to soften her image and not ever face a tough point from Katie Hobbs."

Democrats have also warned against underestimating Lake's ability to connect with the public given her decades as a TV anchor beaming into voters' living rooms and her ease in front of the cameras.

Contrasting with her opponent, Hobbs' platform focuses on the economy (via a child tax credit and other measures); reproductive health and abortion access; and the drought-fueled water crisis, among others.

"I'd rather be in her shoes than Kari Lake's," a second Democratic strategist, who also requested anonymity, said of Hobbs. "But there hasn't been the strength that would be really helpful."

Hobbs' campaign has reportedly faced staff turnover since earlier this year -- and there has been other controversy.

Accusations of racism and sexism from Talonya Adams, a former staffer in Hobbs' state Senate office, are occasionally raised on the campaign trail, according to Quezada, the state treasurer candidate. (Hobbs said last year, about Adams, who was fired from her office: "I can say with certainty on my part, my decision in the termination was not based on race or gender. There were other factors.")

"If you look at the differences, Sinema and Kelly almost made no errors," said Mike Noble, an Arizona-based nonpartisanpollster. "You're seeing multiple missteps on Hobbs's run, whether turnover of staff on the campaign, the Talonya Adams issue of not being prepped for that, which they knew about for years -- but then most recently, the debate they weren't going to do."

To be sure, Hobbs has vocal defenders, both in Arizona and Washington.

Arizona gubernatorial candidate Katie Hobbs speaks at a press conference outside Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich's office in Phoenix, Sept. 24, 2022.News Katie Hobbs And Arizona Attorney General Candidate Kris Mayes Will Host A Press Conference

The Republic/USA Today Network

"The handwringing over Katie Hobbs is wildly overstated," said local Democratic strategist Stacy Pearson. "This is a homegrown candidate who has served her state for more than a decade since before Arizona was a swing state. So, if she's not polished enough, or hasn't had 20 years of television experience, or isn't quick enough on the draw, most Arizonans don't care."

"The DGA continues to view Arizona as one of our best pickup opportunities and is all in to make sure Katie Hobbs is elected as its next governor on November 8," added Democratic Governors Association spokesperson Christina Amestoy.

The race experts who spoke with ABC News said that hitting Lake on her conspiracy theories about the 2020 race and her abortion stances are the lowest hanging fruit -- and Hobbs has ramped up her attacks. (Lake has tried to recast her election denials as about "honesty and faith" and said Hobbs should debate her about it.)

After a state court revived a Civil War-era ban on most abortions, Hobbs swiftly scrapped a campaign event and held a press conference outside the office of the Republican state attorney general, who has supported that law.

She's also been running ads on abortion access, including one video warning that Lake would sic law enforcement on medical professionals who aid in an abortion.The pre-statehood law, which Lake had also backed, includes prison time for abortion providers. Lake has subsequently said, "It would be really wonderful if abortion was rare and legal," a comment that was quickly walked back.

"Keeping abortion front and center is probably the most important thing [Hobbs] can do, and she's doing it," said Bill Scheel, a longtime Arizona Democratic strategist.

Hobbs' team boasted that her approach will work with voters. Campaign manager NicoleDemont saidin a statement for this story that "Arizonans are rejecting Kari Lake's extreme and dangerous positions that are so far outside the mainstream" and "we're confident that sanity will beat chaos and Sec. Hobbs will be elected in November."

That confidence may be challenged in the race's final weeks, the outside operatives say, with early voting right around the corner.

"It's a toss-up, and the next couple of weeks are going to be crucial because ballots drop on Oct. 12," the first strategist said. "She has the ability to do it, the team's got the ability to do it They've just got to make the decision to proceed and not be behind the eight ball."

ABC News' Libby Cathey contributed to this report.

Continued here:
Arizona Democrats hope to flip the governor's mansion, but Katie Hobbs has some worried - ABC News

Tim Scott airs campaign ad criticizing Democrats and ‘the media’ on race – Washington Examiner

Sen. Tim Scott (R-SC) is up with a new campaign advertisement attacking Democrats and the media for wielding race relations as a political wedge, even as his reelection in the Palmetto State is all but assured.

My family went from cotton to Congress in one lifetime. So, how did the Democrats and media welcome South Carolina's first black senator? When I wrote a bill strengthening policing, they called me Uncle Tim, Scott says in the 30-second spot, speaking straight to the camera. When I wrote a bill cutting taxes for single moms, they called me a prop.

WALKER ABORTION ALLEGATIONS AND TONGUE-LASHING FROM SON COMPLICATE EFFORT TO UNSEAT WARNOCK

The Left continues to run a divisive playbook because minorities who think for themselves represent an existential threat to their fracturing coalition, Scott told the Washington Examiner in a statement. I refuse to back down because I know their attacks aren't just about me they want to scare all other conservative minorities into silence.

The new spot, slated to run statewide on South Carolina television, is part of a previous $2.5 million advertising buy.

But Scott would probably be on a glide path to reelection even without the ad blitz.

South Carolina is a red state, the midterm elections have unfolded as an uphill climb for Democrats, and Scott is not facing the sort of compelling, well-funded Democratic challenger who took on Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) in 2020.

The lack of political pressure at home, combined with a flush war chest, has enabled Scott to travel the country campaigning for fellow Republicans on the 2022 ballot. Those travels have included trips to key, early presidential primary states, such as Iowa, stoking speculation that the senator is eyeing a White House bid.

Scott, appearing in television ads in those same states funded by a supportive super PAC, is pointedly not ruling out a 2024 presidential campaign.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE FROM THE WASHINGTON EXAMINER

The senator has made clear, however, that this years run for Senate will be his last. He plans to retire from Congress when his next term expires in 2028.

Read the rest here:
Tim Scott airs campaign ad criticizing Democrats and 'the media' on race - Washington Examiner

Most Latinos Say Democrats Care About Them and Work Hard for Their Vote, Far Fewer Say So of GOP – Pew Research Center

Pew Research Center conducted this study to understand the nuances of Hispanic political identity, Hispanics views about some of the political issues being discussed in the U.S. today, and their interest in the upcoming 2022 midterm elections.

For this analysis, we surveyed 7,647 U.S. adults, including 3,029 Hispanics, from Aug. 1-14, 2022. This includes 1,407 Hispanic adults on Pew Research Centers American Trends Panel (ATP) and 1,622 Hispanic adults on Ipsos KnowledgePanel. Respondents on both panels are recruited through national, random sampling of residential addresses. Recruiting panelists by phone or mail ensures that nearly all U.S. adults have a chance of selection. This gives us confidence that any sample can represent the whole population, or in this case the whole U.S. Hispanic population. (See our Methods 101 explainer on random sampling for more details.)

To further ensure the survey reflects a balanced cross-section of the nations Hispanic adults, the data is weighted to match the U.S. Hispanic adult population by age, gender, education, nativity, Hispanic origin group and other categories. Read more about the ATPs methodology. Here are the questions used for our survey of Hispanic adults, along with responses, and its methodology.

The terms Hispanic and Latino are used interchangeably in this report.

The term U.S. born refers to people who are U.S. citizens at birth, including people born in the 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico or other U.S. territories, as well as those born elsewhere to at least one parent who is a U.S. citizen.

The term foreign born refers to persons born outside of the United States to parents neither of whom was a U.S. citizen. The terms foreign born and immigrant are used interchangeably in this report.

Second generation refers to people born in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico or other U.S. territories with at least one first-generation, or immigrant, parent.

Third or higher generation refers to people born in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico or other U.S. territories with both parents born in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico or other U.S. territories.

Language dominance is a composite measure based on self-described assessments of speaking and reading abilities. Spanish-dominant people are more proficient in Spanish than in English (i.e., they speak and read Spanish very well or pretty well but rate their English-speaking and reading ability lower). Bilingual refers to people who are proficient in both English and Spanish. English-dominant people are more proficient in English than in Spanish.

Respondents were asked a question about their voter registration status. In this report, respondents are considered a registered voter if they self-report being absolutely certain they are registered at their current address. Respondents are considered not registered to vote if they report not being registered or express uncertainty about their registration.

Democrat refers to respondents who identify politically with the Democratic Party. Republican refers to respondents who identify politically with the Republican Party. Ind/Other refers to respondents who identify politically as independent or something else.

Democrats and Democratic leaners refers to respondents who identify politically with the Democratic Party or who identify politically as independent or with some other party but lean toward the Democratic Party. Republicans and Republican leaners refers to respondents who identify politically with the Republican Party or who identify politically as independent or with some other party but lean toward the Republican Party.

The terms Republican party and GOP are used interchangeably in this report.

To create the upper-, middle- and lower-income tiers, respondents 2020 family incomes were adjusted for differences in purchasing power by geographic region and household size. Respondents were then placed into income tiers: Middle income is defined as two-thirds to double the median annual income for the entire survey sample. Lower income falls below that range, and Upper income lies above it. For more information about how the income tiers were created, read the methodology.

Nearly two years after former President Donald Trump won more Latino votes than he did in 2016, a new Pew Research Center survey of Latino adults finds that most say the Democratic Party cares about Latinos and works hard to earn their vote. Significantly fewer say the same of the Republican Party. At the same time, fewer than half of Latinos say they see a major difference between the parties, despite living in a deeply polarized era amid growing partisan hostility.

When it comes to the Democratic Party, the survey finds majorities of Latino adults express positive views of it. Some 71% say the Democratic Party works hard for Latinos votes, 63% say it really cares about Latinos, and 60% say the Democratic Party represents the interests of people like themselves. By contrast, shares of Latinos say the same of the Republican Party on each statement, though a somewhat greater share (45%) say that the GOP works hard to earn the votes of Latinos.

While the majority of Latinos have positive views of the Democratic Party, not all do. For example, about a third (34%) say the statement the Democratic Party really cares about Latinos does not describe their views well, and a similar share says the same about the statement the Democratic Party represents the interests of people like you.

Negative assessments extend to both parties. According to the survey, about one-in-five Latinos (22%) say neither of these statements describe their views well: The Democratic Party really cares about Latinos and The Republican Party really cares about Latinos.

In addition, substantial minorities of Hispanic partisans say they have at least a somewhat favorable view of the opposing party on several measures, though sharp differences exist by party affiliation among Hispanics.

Roughly a third of Latino Republicans and GOP leaners (36%) say the Democratic Party really cares about Latinos describes their views at least somewhat well, while 21% of Latino Democrats and Democratic leaners say the Republican Party really cares about Latinos describes their views at least somewhat well.

Meanwhile, more than half of Hispanic Republicans and Republican leaners (56%) say the Democratic Party works hard to earn Latinos votes describes their views at least somewhat well, while about a third of Hispanic Democrats and Democratic leaners (35%) say the Republican Party works hard to earn Latinos votes describes their views at least somewhat well.

At the same time, about half of Hispanics do not see a great deal of difference between what the Democratic and Republican parties stand for, with 36% saying there is a fair amount of difference and 16% saying there is hardly any difference at all between the parties.

Meanwhile, 45% see a great deal of difference between the parties. About equal shares of Hispanic Democrats and Democratic leaners (47%) and Hispanic Republicans and Republican leaners (48%) say there is a great deal of difference between the parties.

These findings emerge from the 2022 National Survey of Latinos by Pew Research Center. The bilingual, nationally representative survey of 3,029 Latino adults was conducted online from Aug. 1-14, 2022. It explores Latinos views about U.S. political parties and key issues leading up to Novembers midterm elections.

Latino registered voters identify with or lean toward the Democratic Party over the Republican Party by a nearly two-to-one margin (64% vs. 33% in this years survey), with Latino party identification shifting little over the past few years.

Even so, Latino registered voters future party affiliation remains uncertain. A 2021 Pew Research Center study of Americans political views found substantial shares of Latino voters fell into groups with soft ties to the political parties. For example, roughly one-in-ten Latino voters who identified as either a Democrat or Republican held political views that more closely aligned with the opposing party than with their own party.

Latino voters are the nations second-largest group of eligible voters (adult U.S. citizens) and are among its fastest-growing voter blocks. In 2022, nearly 35 million Latinos will be eligible to vote, accounting for 14% of the nations eligible voters. The views of Latino voters have received widespread news coverage leading up to the 2022 midterm elections.

Overall, 77% of Latino registered voters are dissatisfied with the way things are going in the country and 54% disapprove of the way Joe Biden is handling his job as president. Meanwhile, just 30% have given a lot of thought to this years congressional elections, with Latino Republicans and Republican leaners more likely than Latino Democrats and Democratic leaners to say this (36% vs. 27%). Yet equal shares of Latino Democrats and Democratic-leaning registered voters (60%) and Latino Republicans and GOP-leaning registered voters (60%) say it really matters who wins control of Congress.

Among Latino registered voters in 2022, 80% say the economy is a very important issue when deciding who to vote for in the upcoming congressional midterm elections, a greater share than any other issue, and unchanged since March. Other top issues include health care (71%), violent crime and education (70% each) and gun policy (66%).

Meanwhile, abortion has risen the most in importance as a voting issue among Hispanics in recent months, a shift that comes after the Supreme Courts decision to end the federal guarantee of a right to legal abortion in the United States. Nearly six-in-ten Hispanic voters (57%) say the issue is very important, up from 42% in March. This pattern is also seen among all U.S. registered voters, as abortion has risen in importance leading up to the 2022 midterm elections.

On other issues, slightly more than half of Hispanic voters say immigration, climate change and Supreme Court appointments are very important issues for deciding their vote in the 2022 congressional midterm elections.

The August 2022 survey finds about half of Latino registered voters (53%) say they would vote for or are leaning toward the Democratic candidate for the U.S. House of Representatives in their congressional district, compared with 28% who say they would vote for the Republican candidate. About one-in-five (18%) say they would vote for another candidate or are not sure who they would vote for.

A majority of Hispanic Catholics (59%) and those who are religiously unaffiliated (60%) those who describe themselves as atheists, agnostics or nothing in particular say they would vote for the Democratic candidate for the U.S. House in their congressional district. By contrast, more Hispanic evangelical Christians say they would vote Republican than Democratic (50% vs. 32%).

The strength of Hispanic identity is also linked to how Hispanic registered voters would vote. Most Hispanics who say being Hispanic is extremely or very important to how they think of themselves (60%) would vote for the Democratic candidate in their local congressional district. Meanwhile, those who say being Hispanic is less important to their identity are more evenly split between voting for the Democratic and Republican candidates in their districts House race (45% vs. 38%).

As the midterm elections approach, fewer than half of Latino registered voters (45%) say they approve of the way Biden is handling his job as president, while about half (54%) disapprove. U.S. registered voters overall have a more negative view of Biden (61% disapprove vs. 37% approve), according to the same August survey.

Bidens approval rating varies some across demographic subgroups of Hispanic registered voters. Hispanic Democrats hold largely positive views of Biden. Nearly two-thirds of Hispanic Democrats and Democratic leaners (65%) approve of the presidents job performance, but a substantial minority (34%) disapprove. By contrast, nearly all Hispanic Republicans and Republican leaners (92%) disapprove of Biden.

Among Latino registered voters, only 29% of evangelical Christians approve of Bidens job performance, while a greater share of Latino Catholics (53%) and those with no religious affiliation (44%) say the same.

A greater share of Hispanic voters who say being Hispanic is important to how they think of themselves approve of Bidens job performance than do Hispanics who say being Hispanic is less important to their identity (52% vs. 37%).

A clear majority of Hispanic registered voters (73%) say they would not like to see Trump remain a national political figure, including nearly all Latino Democrats and Democratic leaners (94%). By contrast, 63% of Hispanic Republicans and GOP leaners say they would like to see Trump remain a national political figure, including about four-in-ten (41%) who say he should run for president in 2024.

Among Latino registered voters, evangelicals (43%) are more likely than Catholics (22%) and those with no religious affiliation (18%) to say Trump should remain a national political figure. And a quarter of Latino evangelical registered voters say Trump should run for president in 2024.

Since George Floyds killing in May 2020, the nation has gone through a sharp and deep discussion about race and equality, police funding and racial discrimination. And while racial discrimination is experienced by many Latinos directly sometimes from non-Latinos, sometimes from other Latinos views about how Americans identify and see racial discrimination are somewhat varied.

According to the new Center survey, most Latinos say people not seeing racial discrimination where it really does exist is a significant problem. A majority (61%) say it is a bigger problem for the country than people seeing racial discrimination where it really does not exist.

Nearly three-quarters of Latino Democrats and Democratic leaners (73%) say people not seeing racial discrimination where it really does exist is a bigger problem. By contrast, about six-in-ten Republicans and Republican leaners (62%) say it is a bigger problem that people see racial discrimination where it really does not exist.

Meanwhile, two-thirds of Hispanics who say being Hispanic is important to how they think of themselves (66%) say people not seeing racial discrimination where it really does exist is a significant problem, a greater share than among Hispanics who say being Hispanic is less important to how the think of themselves (54%).

The survey finds that Latinos are divided along party lines on key social issues in ways similar to the U.S. public, though the views of Latinos are sometimes less polarized on key issues.

The Supreme Court has made major decisions on cases in recent months that resulted in restricted access to legal abortions and expanded rights to carry guns in public, the latter coming after high-profile mass shootings in Texas and New York.

A majority of Hispanics (57%) say abortion should be legal in at least some cases, including 69% of Democrats and Democratic leaners who say the same. By contrast, 39% of Hispanic Republicans and GOP leaners say abortion should be legal in all or most cases.

Hispanics views on abortion differ from U.S. adults overall, particularly when comparing the views of Latinos and U.S. adults of the same party. Compared with Hispanics, a slightly greater share of U.S. adults (62%) say abortion should be legal in at least some cases. And a greater share of Democrats and Democratic leaners overall (84%) than Hispanic Democrats and Democratic leaners (69%) say abortion should generally be legal. Hispanic Republicans views on this issue are nearly identical to views among all Republicans and Republican leaners, 60% of whom say abortion should be illegal in all or most cases.

On gun policy, about seven-in-ten Hispanics (73%) say it is more important to control gun ownership; 26% say its more important to protect the right of Americans to own guns. Hispanic Democrats and Democratic leaners are about twice as likely as Hispanic Republicans and Republican leaners to prioritize controlling gun ownership over protecting the rights to own guns (85% vs. 45%).

Compared with Hispanics, a smaller share of U.S. adults overall (52%) say it is more important to control gun ownership than to protect gun ownership rights. Hispanic Republicans and GOP leaners are considerably more likely than Republicans overall to say this (45% vs. 18%). Among Democrats and Democratic leaners, similar shares of Hispanics (85%) and U.S. adults overall (81%) say controlling gun ownership should be the priority.

More than a third of Latinos (37%) say same-sex marriage being legal is good for society, while a similar share say it is neither good nor bad for society. Latino Democrats and Democratic leaners are more likely than Latino Republicans and Republican leaners to say same-sex marriage being legal is a good thing for society (46% vs. 21%). Hispanic Republicans are more likely than Hispanic Democrats to say it is a bad thing (41% vs. 20%). Meanwhile, about a third of Latinos from both parties say same-sex marriage is neither a good nor bad thing.

Latinos views of greater social acceptance of transgender people follows a similar pattern: 36% of Latinos say it is somewhat or very good for society, including 45% of Democrats and Democratic leaners and 18% of Republicans and GOP leaners. About a third of Latinos from both parties say it is neither a good nor bad thing.

Some parts of the national Latino population have recent immigrant connections to countries that have socialist or communist governments (such as Cuba and Venezuela) or have had them (such as Chile and Nicaragua). In metropolitan areas such as Miami, political candidates views on socialism often became a prominent campaign issue in 2020. For those with a positive view of socialism, the word can take on a broader meaning and include U.S. government programs or democratic socialist governments such Denmark or Finland.

According to the new Center survey, a larger share of Hispanics have a negative than positive impression of socialism (53% vs. 41%). By contrast, Hispanics have a more positive than negative view of capitalism (54% vs. 41%).

When it comes to socialism, Hispanic Democrats and Democratic leaners are split on how they view socialism (48% negative vs. 50% positive). Meanwhile, Hispanic Republicans and Republican leaners have a more negative impression of socialism, with nearly three-quarters (72%) viewing socialism negatively.

Latinos ages 18 to 29 are more evenly divided in their views of socialism (46% positive vs. 50% negative), a pattern seen among all U.S. young people. While Latinos ages 30 to 49 are similarly divided, a majority of those ages 50 to 64 and those 65 or older say they see socialism negatively.

Hispanics who say being Hispanic is extremely or very important to how they think of themselves are evenly split in their views of socialism (47% positive and 48% negative). Hispanics who say being Hispanic is less important to how they think of themselves have a more negative view (62%).

By contrast, about two-thirds of Hispanic Republicans and Republican leaners (68%) have a positive view of capitalism, a greater share than among Hispanic Democrats and Democratic leaners (50%).

Hispanic adults and the U.S. public overall generally have similar views of capitalism. Majorities of Hispanics (54%) and U.S. adults (57%) have a positive impression of capitalism.

The vast majority of Hispanics say the U.S. is either one of the best countries the world (51%) or that the U.S. stands above all other countries in the world (21%). About a quarter of Hispanics (26%) say there are other countries that are better than the U.S. Hispanics have mostly similar views to U.S. adults overall on how America compares to other nations.

Latino Democrats and Democratic leaners are more likely than Latino Republicans and GOP leaners to say there are other countries that are better than the U.S. (30% vs. 18%). Meanwhile, a larger share of Latino Republicans than Latino Democrats say the U.S. stands above all other countries in the world (31% vs. 17%). Despite these differences, about half of both Latino Republicans (50%) and Latino Democrats (52%) choose the middle ground, saying that the U.S. is one of the greatest countries in the world along with some others.

About four-in-ten Hispanics ages 18 to 29 (43%) say other countries are better than the U.S., a greater share than among those ages 30 to 49 (27%), 50 to 64 (16%) and those ages 65 or older (7%). A similar pattern by age exists among all U.S. adults.

The rest is here:
Most Latinos Say Democrats Care About Them and Work Hard for Their Vote, Far Fewer Say So of GOP - Pew Research Center

LAURA INGRAHAM: This is not the first time Democrats have lied and smeared to get ahead – Fox News

Angle: Truth & Consequences

Laura Ingraham discusses how the radical Left is losing grip on its agenda as midterms approach on 'The Ingraham Angle.'

Laura Ingraham denounced Democrats for "desperately" clinging to power as their radical agenda unfolds Tuesday on "The Ingraham Angle."

LAURA INGRAHAM: The Democrats thought that they were being clever by nominating Biden in 2020, whom they sold to us and a lot of uneasy voters as kind of a familiar, grandfatherly figure a mainstream Democrat, not an extreme liberal. But all along, the Democrats knew that he was going to be too weak to resist the hard left, and thus he would be a perfect figurehead to preside over their radical agenda. But they don't seem so clever now, do they? It's all unraveling.

DR OZ SPEAKS OUT ON CLOSING THE GAP IN PENNSYLVANIA'S SENATE RACE

President Biden speaks about inflation and supply chain issues in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Damian Dovarganes)

And as the midterms are closing in, they're reduced now to spouting unsubstantiated allegations and lame personal attacks to try desperately to hold on to power. But of course, this is not the first time Democrats have lied and smeared to get ahead.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

WATCH FULL VIDEO HERE:

This article was written by Fox News staff.

Read the original:
LAURA INGRAHAM: This is not the first time Democrats have lied and smeared to get ahead - Fox News