Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

Democrats for governor make lots of promises to win teachers union endorsement – MarylandReporter.com – MarylandReporter.com

By Len Lazarick

The brief speeches at the Maryland State Education Association assembly on Saturday were clearly less important than the 20-page questionnaire the candidates had filled out to win the endorsement of the states largest union, the 76,000-strong educators.

Most of the nine Democrats for governor who spoke touted their own public school educations, their teacher parents or the teachers who saved their lives when a parent died. They also professed their dedication to funding and implementing the Blueprint for Marylands Future, the massive revamping of state schools recommended by the Kirwan Commission and ardently backed by the union.

Probably the most interesting speeches came from the two candidates who knew there was no way they were going to get the unions endorsement, Jerome Segal and Comptroller Peter Franchot. They both oppose the Blueprint.

Segal, 78, a former philosophy professor who founded, then disbanded the Democratic socialist Bread and Roses Party, trashed the Blueprint in a scathing, rapid-fire language. He called it the worst document ever produced on public education.

Franchot, as he has done throughout the past year campaigning for governor, didnt even mention the Blueprint but promised that in four years, he would be known as the greatest education governor in the history of Maryland.

He then made alternative promises that would be as difficult to keep as the major changes in public schools in the Blueprint plan.

Franchot pledged to reduce class size to 20 and reduce standardized tests by 90%.

You know me, he told the teachers several times, even reminding them of his support for starting school after Labor Day, a measure the union strongly opposed and eventually had reversed.

Im not talking about a bunch of BS, said Franchot. He then promised that if elected,he would allow the teachers to be first in line to board the planes at the state-run BWI airport,

Former attorney general Doug Gansler said he was the only one who can win a general election.

The biggest laugh line of the speeches came at Ganslers expense. Jon Baron, a former nonprofit executive and federal official, said if he wasnt elected this year, in 20 years the teachers union would be back in this assembly with the same problems facing public schools and Doug Gansler will still be running for governor.

The teachers union eventually voted to endorse Wes Moore, the author, former 82nd Airborne Army captain, and nonprofit executive. He promised, I will be your greatest champion and would fully implement the Blueprint. He also opposed any expansion of charter schools.

The endorsement of Moore was recommended to the assembly by the smaller endorsement council, which nominated Moore based on his personal history as a Marylander with a commitment to service and leadership that aligns with MSEAs goals for a world-class education for every student. He got 85% of the up-or-down vote on the recommended endorsement.

Continued here:
Democrats for governor make lots of promises to win teachers union endorsement - MarylandReporter.com - MarylandReporter.com

Democrats Creating Their Own October Surprise – The American Prospect

Watching congressional Democrats these days feels like a painful, slow-motion car wreck. They are sleepwalking into a health care disaster thats entirely of their own making. With little debate or media focus, Democrats are on the verge of dooming millions of Americans to huge new health care bills, which will in turn serve to ruin any hope Democrats have of winning the midterms. And that will effectively destroy any chance of real health care reform for at least another decade.

In 2021, as part of the American Rescue Plan, Democrats improved the Affordable Care Act subsidies for the insurance exchanges. For the first time, this created a situation where all American citizens qualified to get health insurance at a legally defined affordable premium. Despite its flaws, it was a big ideological statement, and a serious improvement for the 14 million with exchange coverage. While the bill only improved subsidies for two years, almost everyone assumed Democrats would eventually make the change permanent, since it had support across the entire Senate caucus, and allowing enhanced subsidies to expire would be politically idiotic.

More from Jon Walker

It turns out, though, that one should never underestimate the collective incompetence of the Democratic Party. Making the enhanced subsidies permanent was supposed to be part of the Build Back Better plan, but Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV) killed that. Now, Manchin is talking about a new, much smaller reconciliation package, which notably does not include these subsidies or any other social-program improvements. All of the spending in Manchins proposed package would be on energy programs.

According to the Department of Health and Human Services, some 3.4 million Americans will become uninsured if these subsidies arent extended. The health care foundation KFF determined that premiums would more than double for many. Potentially all subscribers on the insurance exchanges will be affected, though we dont know precisely how.

Unlike the expiration of the expanded Child Tax Credit, which was a relatively even hit for every parent a year before the election, how much a person will be impacted varies greatly depending on income, age, and location. For some, the change will be modest, but others will receive news effectively of financial ruin right before they vote.

While current enhanced ACA subsidies dont expire until the end of December, open enrollment to sign up for insurance in 2023 starts on November 1st. This means customers will receive letters about their 2023 premiums, and the news will start covering stories about premium increases, in October, the same time that mail-in ballots will reach voters.

Currently, inflation ranks as the top concern among Americans, and Democrats have set it up so that millions will be told they face a massive increase in their cost of living right before the election.

Beyond broadly hurting 14 million people, the end of these subsidies will create thousands of uniquely horrific stories of financial devastation.

For a sense of how devastating inaction on extending the subsidies will be, imagine a 60-year-old woman in Huntington, West Virginia, who lost her job due to the pandemic and started a small business making $56,000 a year. The enhanced ACA subsidies mean that this year, the cheapest health insurance plan is costing her only $93 a month. But next year without the subsidies, she will be paying over $1,500 a month for the same coverage with a very high deductible.

Since almost no one thought Democrats would fail to extend the subsidies, many people made employment and financial plans accordingly. Individuals have quit jobs, moved, dropped previous insurance, and made other plans that rely on the new subsidies, only to have the rug potentially pulled out from under them in October.

Beyond broadly hurting 14 million people, the end of these subsidies will create thousands of uniquely horrific stories of financial devastation. Due to the weird interplay of the ACAs insurance rules around age and the design of the subsidies, the most jaw-dropping price hikes will be among older middle-class Americans. Many of them will likely feel betrayed that Democrats made them financially worse off than before. This is a group that tends to turn out disproportionately in midterm elections. All of these stories will be news fodder to highlight in the weeks before the midterms.

Congressional Republicans have steadfastly opposed any improvement to the ACA since its inception. Republicans have even refused to allow the normal minor clerical corrections that follow almost every major piece of legislation, so they could try to exploit these technical issues to ruin the ACA in multiple lawsuits. If Republicans win another massive midterm victory because Democrats once again mishandled health care, it is extremely unlikely they are going to want to turn around and help Democrats fix the problem.

Furthermore, if Republicans win in 2022, Democrats are unlikely to win another trifecta for at least another decade, if not longer. In addition, if millions of people feel they have been burned by making the mistake of choosing to use the Democrats health care program, public opinion of the program could take a big hit. The ACAs favorable rating has improved by five points since Democrats enhanced the subsidies, but remains at 58 percent, owing in part to implacable opposition from the right wing. Those numbers will likely rocket downward if the subsidy enhancements expire.

On a separate track, previous pandemic relief measures included a continuous coverage option that gave states higher shares of Medicaid funding. Those changes end if the administration ends the public-health emergency created by COVID-19. The emergency could end as soon as this summer, according to published reports, which would instantly allow states to cull their Medicaid rolls and throw 12 million people, by one estimate, off public health insurance. Build Back Better would have stepped down the increased payments to states slowly, kept a small portion of them in place, and made it harder for states to disenroll lots of beneficiaries in one shot. But with Build Back Better dead, thats gone too, imperiling millions of Medicaid patients, again just before the midterms.

If Democrats miss the opportunity to permanently fix Medicaid and the ACA subsidies, it might not be possible to ever rebuild trust in the ACA or in the Democrats brand as the party of health care. It will be very hard to sell slowly building on the ACA if Democrats prove they cant be trusted to ever do that.

Continue reading here:
Democrats Creating Their Own October Surprise - The American Prospect

Inslee rankles fellow Democrats by vetoing part of tax-incentive bill geared toward rural WA – Yakima Herald-Republic

OLYMPIA The veto pen struck again.

For the past few years, Gov. Jay Inslee has irked his fellow Democrats with some of his vetoes, prompting outcries and even lawsuits from legislative leaders for his more creative applications of executive authority.

This week, the governor kept it simple, issuing a standard partial veto of Senate Bill 5901, intended to spur economic development through tax incentives.

Nonetheless, Inslee's veto prompted bursts of frustration yet again from Democratic lawmakers and showed just how central tax preferences are to Washington politics and policy.

In SB 5901, Democrats thought they had a good idea to spur investment in rural Washington: a new sales and use tax deferral program to boost the construction of some large warehouse projects across most of Washington's 39 counties.

Currently, tax deferral programs of this type only exist in King County, according to a fiscal analysis of the legislation.

Sponsored by Sen. Emily Randall, D-Bremerton, SB 5901 also capped the sales tax exemptions for the construction or expansion of warehouses or grain elevators to

$400,000, according to a legislative analysis.

The bill passed the Legislature with bipartisan majorities and was co-sponsored by moderate and progressive Democrats, a conservative Republican and Senate Majority Leader Andy Billig, D-Spokane.

But on Thursday, Inslee rejected a swath of the bill, including parts that expanded the sales tax deferral on large projects across much of the state, and the $400,000 cap.

"I could not justify thinking that it was a good investment for Washingtonians to subsidize warehouse owners, when every time I turn around I see a new warehouse," Inslee said in a question-and-answer session with reporters.

The governor had actually intended to go even further and veto the entire bill, and even prepared the explanation of the full veto. But shortly before Thursday's bill signing, the governor's office decided to keep part of the legislation.

The reason? Because part of the legislation might benefit a clean-energy project the governor is seeking to lure to Washington.

"There was a provision in there that could be important to a high-tech manufacturer in the clean-energy space," Inslee said, when asked about the change to a partial veto.

"It's very important to get that company to Washington state, and it would be a very large entity and would help in our clean energy, as well," he added.

The state is actively trying to recruit that company, according to Inslee spokesperson Jaime Smith. Asked about which company the state is trying to lure, Smith referred questions to the state Department of Commerce.

In an email, spokesperson Penny Thomas wrote that, "as you can imagine, throughout an active recruitment project we are not at liberty to share many specific details, especially the company identity."

The veto prompted frustration from Randall, who is expected to have one of the most competitive Senate races this fall.

"Now, with this partial veto, SB 5901's impact will not expand beyond the biggest warehouses in King County, and the smaller facilities and businesses like those that might grow and scale at the Port of Bremerton's industrial park will not see the benefits of this tax exemption," Randall said in prepared remarks. "I am extremely disappointed in the governor's decision to ignore the needs of our more rural local economies."

In a statement, Billig said he was disappointed and called the veto "misguided."

"The portion of the bill that he vetoed would have saved the state millions of dollars by narrowing a tax exemption used by the largest warehouse developers and, at the same time, provided more opportunity for smaller businesses to benefit from the tax exemption," he said in prepared remarks.

(c)2022 The Seattle Times

Visit The Seattle Times at http://www.seattletimes.com

Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

More here:
Inslee rankles fellow Democrats by vetoing part of tax-incentive bill geared toward rural WA - Yakima Herald-Republic

Democrats only have themselves to blame for the rise of Ron DeSantis – New York Post

The mercurial rise of Ron DeSantis is the Democrats fault.

I say this with gratitude, not regret. Absent some catastrophe, DeSantis is going to win a second term as governor of Florida this coming November and, after that, he has a fair shot of being president. This is partly because he has done an excellent job for his state. Its also because he was unusually lucky in his enemies.

Unable to help themselves, the Democrats have aided him at every stage. They still are.

2018 was a good year for the Democratic Party, but not so good a year that the quality of its candidates didnt matter. Had the party nominated a credible centrist in Floridas toss-up gubernatorial race Gwen Graham, for example that candidate would not only have won the governors mansion for the Democrats for the first time in two decades, shed have ended DeSantis career.

But the Democrats didnt choose a credible centrist. They hosted a messy and divisive primary, selected the radical Andrew Gillum as their nominee, lost by 0.4 points, and set DeSantis up for a bright future. Opportunity: missed.

The Dems still had a chance to turn it around, even after he won. Ron DeSantis is a good governor, but he is not perfect, he does not get every call right, and he is as susceptible to base political temptation as any other human being. Florida has undoubtedly grown more Republican of late, but it is not Mississippi, and the Democratic Party will eventually win a big election here simply by being a sober, credible alternative to the GOP.

If the Florida Democratic Party understands this, it has a peculiar way of showing it. Instead of calmly rebuilding, it has allowed itself to become so crazy in its opposition to DeSantis, it has elevated him to national status, provided him with all the incentives he needs to play Churchill at the gates, and, by confirming that any Republican (not just Trump) will be treated terribly in the press, turned him into a rock-ribbed conservative hero.

To DeSantis delight, his opponents have become addicted to stepping on rakes. In their desperation to take him down, the Florida Democratic Party has chased one absurd conspiracy theory after another. Its leading lights have sided with the disgraced fabulist Rebekah Jones, who falsely accused DeSantis of manipulating state COVID data; it has spread a debunked 60 Minutes claim that there was something untoward about Florida using the states largest supermarket chain to distribute vaccines; it has pretended that the plan to make Florida the 23rd state with a state guard augurs something sinister; and it has advertised a link that does not exist between contracts awarded to the drug company, Regneron, and donations to DeSantis campaign.

Worse still, the party has come to believe its own rhetoric. Nikki Fried, the states Democratic agriculture secretary (and a potential 2022 gubernatorial nominee), has taken to claiming that Florida isnt a free state; to comparing DeSantis to the leader of a communist country, to a dictator, and, in a lot of ways, to Hitler; and to charging that he represents a danger to the world. In the meantime, her colleagues in the legislature have gone all out to oppose a set of COVID policies that have made Florida a magnet for disgruntled Americans and to assail a K-3 education bill that, despite the dishonest way in which it has been characterized (Dont Say Gay), is popular among Democrats.

The results have been predictable. DeSantis now leads his likely opponents in every reputable statewide poll, has an approval rating of around 55%, and, when compared to the hysterical descriptions to whichvotersare treated, appears refreshingly normal to the average American.

Bang-up job, guys.

Charles C. W. Cooke is a senior writer at National Review.

Read the original here:
Democrats only have themselves to blame for the rise of Ron DeSantis - New York Post

Democrats push Garland to come down on uncooperative Trump allies – Axios

Democratic lawmakers are openly pressuring Attorney General Merrick Garland to bring the weight of U.S. law enforcement againstmembers offormer President Trump's inner circlethey've deemed uncooperative with the House'sinvestigation of the Jan. 6 attack.

Why it matters: The House select committee is seeking to compel or punish Trump loyalists who don't comply with the investigation, while Republicans are preparing to win back control of Congress in November and end the probe.

The big picture: The pressure campaign is putting President Biden on a collision course with his own party.

What we're watching: During a meeting Monday night at which the select committee recommended House contempt votes against former Trump aides Dan Scavino and Peter Navarro, Reps. Elaine Luria (D-Va.), Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.) and Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) all called on Garland to act.

How we got here: The ramped-up calls come three months after the House voted to hold former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows in contempt for ending cooperation with the investigation.

Federal prosecutors so far have not brought charges.

But, but, but: Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), chair of the House Democratic Caucus, said neither the committee nor the Justice Department should "operate under false deadlines and timeframes that would render their work incomplete."

Read the rest here:
Democrats push Garland to come down on uncooperative Trump allies - Axios