Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

Have Democrats mapped out the future of energy? – Fox News

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Author and Fox News contributor Douglas Murray joined "Jesse Watters Primetime" Friday to explain the Democrats' energy agenda and why they have "mapped out the future" to be electric.

DOUGLAS MURRAY: What's happening in California could be all of our future. It's just amazing, isn't it, the way the Democrats do this? Remember, at the beginning of the coronavirus, the Democrats and the World Economic Forum and all these bodies said, "This is a great opportunity. This is a great opportunity to increase our reliance on green energy. Now Russia invades Ukraine. This is a great opportunity. Guys, we could increase our reliance on green energy."

How do they manage this? You can do the same thing with a virus. You can do the same thing with Russia invading Ukraine, strangely. It's all a vindication of Democrat policies of the kind that's rolled out in California.

WATCH FULL VIDEO HERE:

See original here:
Have Democrats mapped out the future of energy? - Fox News

Progressives push Biden to act with Democrats midterm hopes in balance – The Guardian

When Senator Joe Manchin announced in December that he would not support the Build Back Better Act, House progressives immediately got to work. As the Congressional Progressive Caucus continued to lobby for passing a social spending package, its members also started crafting a list of potential executive orders that Biden could sign to advance Democrats policy agenda.

That list was released in mid-March after months of deliberations, and it outlines a specific strategy for Biden to combat the climate crisis and lower costs for American families with the flick of his pen.

The suggestions from the CPC demonstrate the increasing pressure that Biden faces from progressive Democrats to take more decisive action before the midterm elections in November, where many in his party fear they could get badly beaten.

Progressives warn that, if Biden does not start signing more executive orders, Democrats failure to follow through on many of their campaign promises will result in severely depressed voter turnout among their supporters in November, probably allowing Republicans to regain control of the House and the Senate.

If such a thing were to happen, it would represent a perhaps crippling blow to Bidens first term and cement an unlikely recovery for a Republican party still beholden to its Trumpist base and where Donald Trump himself is considering a 2024 White House campaign.

The CPCs list of possible orders addresses everything from the climate crisis to immigration reform and healthcare costs, covering a broad array of issues that affect a large swath of the Democratic coalition.

The suggestions include expanding Affordable Care Act insurance coverage for 5.1 million families and lowering the costs of essential drugs like insulin. To help families budgets, the CPC is also calling for canceling federal student loan debt and expanding eligibility for overtime pay. On the issue of the climate crisis, the list includes an order to declare a national climate emergency and reinstate a ban on US crude oil exports.

We have made important and significant progress as Democrats in the first year of the Biden presidency, the CPC chair, Pramila Jayapal, said. But our work is far from done. We have an ambitious agenda, and we want to make sure we continue building on this progress.

The CPC is not alone in turning its attention to the power of the executive pen, as other progressive elements of the Democratic party urge decisive action from Biden.

Members of the Congressional Black Caucus have held meetings recently to discuss executive orders Biden could sign to advance voting rights and criminal justice reform. The Congressional Hispanic Caucus also expects to soon release its own suggestions for executive orders aimed at reforming the US immigration system, and the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus is similarly working on a letter to the White House about advancing its policy priorities.

Progressive groups have been vocal advocates for Biden expanding his use of executive orders. Dozens of grassroots organizations consulted with the CPC as it crafted its list, and those groups have underscored the urgency of Biden signing the suggested orders, particularly as Democrats look ahead to the midterms.

I think young people came out in record numbers in 2020 because they felt that Democrats promised an alternative to what weve lived through our entire lives. Were burdened by a planet in a state of emergency; we are burdened by crushing student loan debt, said John Paul Mejia, chief spokesperson for the climate group Sunrise Movement, which worked with the CPC.

Mejia argued that the executive orders represent Democrats best opportunity to motivate young voters enough to show up in November.

If young people want to be mobilized and energized and instilled with any form of inspiration to go out to the polls, I think President Bidens going to really have to take executive action and deliver as much as he can as fast as he can, Mejia said.

The White House seems to be listening to progressives warnings. The Intercept reported on Thursday that the Biden administration is drafting an executive order to bolster manufacturing of clean energy technologies, a suggestion that was included in the CPCs list.

Despite the recent focus on executive action, progressives are careful to emphasize that they are not giving up on legislative efforts to enact Bidens agenda.

Carol Joyner, director of the labor project for working families at Family Values @ Work, said the CPC list was very strong but not a substitute for passing some version of the Build Back Better Act. After all, some crucial portions of the original $1.7tn spending package including the expanded child tax credit and a national paid leave program almost certainly cannot be enacted via executive action.

This is a fair start, and it reflects the limitations of what you can do and accomplish under executive order. However, we do know that the care infrastructure needs to be established and expanded in this country in order to support working people, Joyner said. That type of legislation is whats going to have a more profound impact on everyone.

Senate Democrats continue to hold hearings on specific portions of Bidens Build Back Better agenda, with the hope of crafting a new version of the bill that can attract Manchins support. In the past week alone, Senate committees have held hearings on lowering childcare costs, increasing homecare services to seniors and investing in clean energy. Manchin has also restarted negotiations with fellow Democrats with the climate portions of the Build Back Better Act, according to the Washington Post.

I feel cautiously optimistic, Mejia said of the possibility of getting a spending package passed. It would be stupid for Democrats not to pass climate provisions of Build Back Better at a time when they not only face the urgent timeline of a climate emergency, but also when young people are losing hope in the party.

But progressives have been burned by Manchin before, which is why they say Biden needs to pursue a two-prong strategy of signing executive orders while simultaneously trying to advance legislation.

Im proud of us for pivoting but also being able to keep both tracks moving around a legislative solution and executive action solution, said Natalia Salgado, director of federal affairs for the Working Families party. The progressive movement in general is made up of a lot of organizers. And if youre an organizer, one of the main lessons you learn at the beginning of your career is that theres a couple ways to skin a cat.

One of the downsides of relying on executive orders is that they can be easily reversed whenever Republicans regain control of the White House. In the 14 months since he took office, Biden has already signed 85 executive orders. Many of them reversed Donald Trumps policies on immigration, the climate crisis and the coronavirus pandemic. A future Republican president could do the same.

But progressives remain convinced that executive orders are one of Bidens best options to deliver immediate relief to the young Americans, women and people of color who helped get him elected.

I dont think we should be concerned about what happens down the road. Right now, President Biden has the pen, Joyner said. And if he can pass executive orders that support working people and help create jobs and help to rebuild our economy and make it stronger and more equitable, then he should do it.

Read more from the original source:
Progressives push Biden to act with Democrats midterm hopes in balance - The Guardian

Letters to the Editor: Democrats, think long term about Supreme Court – Los Angeles Times

To the editor: Lets hope Democrats listen to Jackie Calmes when she points out the rights coming under attack by conservatives that may end up before the Supreme Court. They have no reason to celebrate one progressive jurist replacing another on the bench, where conservatives regressive 6-3 majority will remain intact, likely leaving progressives outnumbered well into the 2030s.

Instead, Democrats should reflect on how the high court came to be so ideologically skewed: They, unlike Republicans, havent learned to set aside petty internal differences during presidential election years.

Such discord allowed third-party candidates to siphon off enough Democratic votes to enable Donald Trumps 2016 victory. The GOP learned its lesson in 1992, when Ross Perots Reform Party diverted conservative votes from George H.W. Bush. The Democrats failed to learn from how Ralph Naders Green Party candidacy undermined Al Gores 2000 run.

With a more united Democratic Party behind Hillary Clinton in 2016, the high court could have retained a solid progressive majority. Lesson learned, Democrats?

Devra Mindell, Santa Monica

Follow this link:
Letters to the Editor: Democrats, think long term about Supreme Court - Los Angeles Times

Democrats have a silly double standard for Clarence Thomas and Joe Biden – New York Post

If were going to create transparently idiotic, partisan standards on the fly, they should be applied to everyone in government.

If Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has an ethical obligation to recuse himself from all cases related to the Jan. 6 riots because his wife Ginni has opinions on the matter, as most Democrats contend, its clear that President Joe Biden has a moral responsibility to step back from any more decisions concerning Ukraine and China.

Now that The New York Times and Washington Post have both authenticated the Hunter Biden e-mails a story the media and tech conglomerates suppressed on the flimsiest of pretexts to help Joe win the 2020 election its also whats right for democracy. Thats how this works, right?

The Biden case is potentially worse because Hunter, under criminal investigation, implicates his father as fiscal beneficiary in his dealings with corrupt Eastern European energy interests and the ChiComs.

Its plausible, of course, that Hunter and his business partner Tony Bobulinski might have been lying about the Big Guy. Its also true that if this story were about any Republican president, the media would be deploying squadrons of reporters to find out. After all, the president has previously said not only that he did not benefit from Hunters work but that he knew absolutely nothing about his sons influence peddling.

And yet there is much circumstantial evidence available that leads us to believe Joe could be lying. For instance:

And the biggest question the press should be asking the president is: Did Joe ever benefit financially from any of Hunters dealings?

The answer might very well still be No. There is, after all, no hard evidence to say otherwise (and, considering the lack of urgency of the institutional press to look into these matters, were probably never going to find out).

However, on a number of occasions during the past five years, I can recall reading deeply reported profiles about the business dealings of the previous presidents children. Journalists and pundits, quite understandably, wondered if the president himself had been aware of their dealings. They wondered if such relationships should be considered unethical.

Then again, even if Joe Biden were completely unaware of his sons machinations, the Clarence Thomas Standard states that it doesnt matter. Joe must recuse himself from making any foreign-policy decisions for the sake of democracy. Otherwise, he should, as Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez maintains, be impeached.

More here:
Democrats have a silly double standard for Clarence Thomas and Joe Biden - New York Post

Dems fall into the culture trap again – The Week

April 1, 2022

April 1, 2022

Democrats were always going to have a tough time in the 2022 midterm elections, given historic trends and the party's already extremely narrow majorities in Congress. Add in surging inflation and a brutal war being waged in Europe and things begin to look especially bleak.

But that doesn't mean all of the party's woes are circumstantial. Some are self-inflicted especially when it comes to the culture-war issues that increasingly dominate American politics.

In recent years, Republicans have become experts at leveraging their own extremism on these issues for electoral gain. The game goes like this: Stake out a right-wing position that cheers the GOP's base, thereby ensuring high turnout in the next election; count on progressive activists to respond with their own mirror-image form of left-wing maximalism and Democratic officeholders to adopt that message as their own; use those words and deeds both to justify the right's original impulse toward extremism and to portray the Republican Party as the country's sole defenders of common sense against an insidious form of progressive ideology.

Then rinse and repeat.

If Democrats want to avoid a wipeout in 2022 and perhaps in 2024 as well, they need to stop responding to the right's extremism with a counter-extremism of their own.

Take abortion. As I recently noted, Republicans in states across the country are busy passing extraordinarily restrictive laws against the reproductive rights of women and handing off enforcement powers to private individuals. These "bounty hunter" provisions, which empower people to sue those who procure (or who aid someone else in procuring) abortions, allow these states to sidestep judicial review and avoid injunctions imposed by federal courts. (If states aren't directly enforcing the statutes, no one has standing to seek relief from the penalties they impose.)

Polls consistently show that something close to 60 percent of Americans think abortion should be legal in all or most cases. That means a very solid majority should be sympathetic to a message like this: In passing laws like these, Republicans are revealing themselves to be radicals far out of step with the American mainstream. Some restrictions on abortion should be permissible, but outright bans are draconian, and efforts to skirt judicial review are un-American in intent and downright authoritarian in effect. What's next? The death penalty for women who have abortions, as some Republicans have proposed?

The point of such a response would be to portray the Democrats as the reasonable party upholding moderation and decency in the face of a lunatic assault on the rights and freedoms of the female half of the population.

Instead, in late February, 48 Democrats voted in favor of a bill the Women's Health Protection Act (WHPA) that would enshrine the right to an abortion through all nine months of pregnancy in the country as a whole and potentiallyknock down parental consent laws in 37 states. A solid majority may think abortion should be legal in all or most cases, but support for post-viability, late-term abortions is far lower, and the most recent Gallup poll to ask about parental-consent laws (from 2011) found 71 percent support for them.

That means Democrats have somehow managed to place themselves on the negative side of public opinion on an issue where they should easily be able to portray their opponents as the extremists. That might delight single-issue activists and the most ideologically progressive donors to the party, but it could well turn out to be electoral poison in November and beyond.

A similar dynamic is playing out around Florida's "Parental Rights in Education" bill, which Gov. Ron DeSantis (R)signed into law earlier this week. LGBT activists have had considerable success in persuading journalists and Democratic officeholders to label the legislation the "Don't Say Gay" bill and in describing it as motivated by anti-gay and anti-transgender animus, which could well be both true and an effective message for Democrats, at least in some parts of the country.

There is legitimate reason to worry that the law, which seems to have been written in intentionally vague language, could be interpreted to permit sweeping restrictions on what teachers of all grades can say about sexuality and gender in schools. Yet the passage of the bill that has gotten the most media attention is one that bans "classroom instruction" on "sexual orientation or gender identity" from kindergarten through the third grade. That makes it sound like Democratic opposition to the bill is motivated by the desire to teach young kids about subjects that most parents are likely to consider, quite reasonably, inappropriate for them. (Polling on the bill has been all over the map.)

How can it be that Democrats have ended up, by implication, defending the position that public schools should be free to teach children younger than 8 years old about sexual orientation and gender identity? Coming on the heels of controversy about the teaching of "critical race theory" in public schools and residual animus against teacher's unions for demanding pandemic-related school closings, this stance could ultimately blow up in the face of Democrats big time.

And not without reason. Trying at the state level to regulate the details of public-school curricula and restrict what teachers can say in the classroom is a bad idea. Saying so could give Democrats leverage to oppose bills like the one DeSantis championed in Florida while rallying the American majority to their side. But only if it's paired with a defense of giving local school boards the power to make these decisions for themselves. Taking the opposite view that parents should get no say in what their kids are taught and implying that teachers and administrators should be empowered to introduce little kids to issues in sexuality and gender is a politically toxic position that could only appeal to a progressive activist.

In political terms, the culture war is a battle over definitions: Which party is narrowly extreme and sectarian? And which stands with America's conflicted majority? In repeatedly taking the Republican bait, Democrats deny themselves of the chance to prevail by refusing to confirm the right's caricature of their position. We're not the extreme ones! They are!

The only way for liberals to win the right's radicalizing culture-war game is not to play.

Go here to read the rest:
Dems fall into the culture trap again - The Week