Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

How effective will GOP-led task force on China be without Democrats? – KSL.com

SALT LAKE CITY Americans and the world have come to realize that, thanks to the coronavirus pandemic, China isnt just another trading partner, Rep. Chris Stewart said Friday.

Theyre not just a guy across the ocean who builds really cool plastic things, he said on KSL Newsradios Live Mic. China has an ambition to be not just one of, but to be the single dominant influence in the world militarily, politically, economically, diplomatically.

Stewart said the Republican-led congressional task force he was named to Thursday has an opportunity to recognize that as it looks at issues in the U.S.-China relationship regarding coronavirus, intelligence military, education and others. Rep. John Curtis, R-Utah, is also a member of the group, which held its first meeting Friday.

China was a geopolitical threat well before COVID-19, and the past few weeks have only increased the urgency to address existing and emerging threats head on, according to Stewart.

There is a broad scope to this, he said.

The 15-member panel was originally supposed to include Democrats, but they withdrew from the project after several months of discussion, and Republicans decided to move ahead without them.

We were about to make an announcement about mid-February, and the day before they backed out of it, and I really dont understand that, Stewart said.

Jon Huntsman Jr., the former U.S. ambassador to China, said on Live Mic that the lack of bipartisanship on the task force concerns him because the Chinese know how to divide and conquer. Theyll know exactly that it isnt a unified group.

Huntsman said if Congress cant figure how to make the coronavirus a matter of national interest, then something has gone horribly wrong.

What would really resonate with the Chinese as opposed to another working group or task force, which theyre probably not going to take too terribly seriously, would be a unified Congress making an expression about Americas outrage with respect to the coronavirus and what we are prepared to do about it long term, he said.

China, he said, fears the U.S. when it is unified.

They dont fear us when were divided because they figure thats never going to amount to very much at all, he said.

Huntsman, a former GOP Utah governor who is running for his old job, said when China knew about the outbreak and for how long it withheld that information are the biggest issues facing the U.S. right now.

They lied, and everyone suffers the implications, he said.

Curtis said in a statement Thursday there is a need for a unified and bipartisan voice on China and hoped the Democrats would soon join the group.

Stewart, a member of the House Intelligence Committee, said the China task force is different from other congressional working groups. He said he has dedicated one staff member to work on it full time.

This ones got teeth, he said. We will have the backbone to actually create something.

Stewart the group would produce a readable report to help inform people about the challenge China poses to the U.S. and also craft legislation to deal with some of the issues.

View original post here:
How effective will GOP-led task force on China be without Democrats? - KSL.com

How Never Trumpers Crashed The Democratic Party – FiveThirtyEight

Anti-Donald Trump activism among conservatives known informally as the #NeverTrump movement started in early 2016 as a way to stop the businessman from winning the GOP nomination. It failed.

Even by the slightly broader standard of influencing Republican politics, #NeverTrump has been largely unsuccessful. Trump won around 90 percent of self-identified Republican voters in 2016, similar to past GOP presidential nominees. About 90 percent of Republicans have approved of Trump throughout his first term, similar to George W. Bushs standing in his first four years in office. And with Trump as the face of the party, Republican congressional candidates won around 90 percent of the GOP vote in the 2018 midterms, just as in recent midterm elections. There is really only one anti-Trump figure among the 249 Republicans on Capitol Hill: Sen. Mitt Romney.

Never Trumpers tried to draft a high-profile Republican like Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan to run against Trump for the GOP nomination. That didnt pan out either. Facing fairly weak opponents, Trump easily won the GOP primaries that occurred earlier this year. Polls also suggest most Republicans will be strongly behind Trump this November too he is getting about 90 percent of the Republican vote in head-to-head match-ups with the presumptive Democratic nominee, former Vice President Joe Biden.

But Never Trumpers are increasingly involved in the Democratic Party and have gradually shifted their tactics in that direction effectively becoming a Never Trump and Never Bernie Sanders coalition. And they appear to be having more success shaping their new party than the one that many of them had been associated with for much of their lives. Heres how that shift has happened.

By pure numbers, the anti-Trump conservative bloc is both fairly small and not that remarkable. The group of Republican voters who disapprove of Trump is similar (but slightly smaller) than Democrats who disapproved of then-President Barack Obama during his first term. Conservatives who really hate Trump probably no longer identify as Republicans 11 percent of Republicans switched their party affiliation between December 2015 and March 2017, according to Pew. But surveys suggest that the share of Democrats switching affiliation in that same period is about the same. Its hard to be precise about this: Data suggests at most 10 percent of American voters overall are anti-Trump but generally lean Republican. Thats not nothing, but between 40 and 50 percent of Americans are likely to vote for Trump in November.

But while this hard to prove conclusively, anti-Trump conservatives are arguably way overrepresented in elite media, at least compared to their numbers in the general population. The New York Times, for example, has three conservative-leaning but Trump-skeptical opinion columnists David Brooks, Ross Douthat, Bret Stephens and no columnists who regularly align with the president. MSNBC has programs fronted by two anti-Trump hosts once closely aligned with the GOP establishment ex-Rep. Joe Scarborough and Nicolle Wallace, a former communications director for President George W. Bush and no explicitly pro-Trump hosts. Among the 53 Washington Post opinion writers highlighted on the papers website, seven are people who have identified with conservatives and/or the Republican Party in the past but regularly attack Trump. Just four are conservatives who regularly defend the president. Numerous anti-Trump conservatives are also featured prominently on CNN.

How did this happen? Well, from the media perspective, the prominence of Never Trump conservatives makes perfect sense. The readers and watchers of The Post, The Times and MSNBC in particular are disproportionately left-leaning. So these audiences probably dont want too much explicitly pro-Trump commentary. At the same time, news outlets usually like to present themselves as both offering a diverse set of voices and not too closely aligned with one party or the other. So by featuring, for example, George Conway, a conservative lawyer turned Never Trump leader who sharply criticizes the president in his cable news appearances and columns in The Washington Post, the press can essentially suggest, Its not just the liberal media, even Republicans were angry when Trump did X.

But its not simply as if the media has hired every Republican who says that they dont like Trump. Many of the conservatives in high-profile media slots (like Brooks) were there before Trumps rise. Robert Saldin, a political science professor at the University of Montana and co-author of a new book on anti-Trump conservatives, said the kind of conservatives who get jobs at places like CNN were predisposed to dislike a Trump-style GOP politician.

Many prominent Never Trumpers, Saldin said, operate and make a living in liberal institutions. They think of their jobs as translating conservative ideas to liberals. They had invested in the idea that conservatism was respectable, he said. In particular, Saldin said, these figures had worked hard to suggest that racism was not a major feature of conservatism.

So they were particularly horrified by Trump because he embodied what they had spent their careers saying was not conservatism, he added.

In my interviews with several prominent Never Trump conservatives, they not only suggested the groups high-media profile was somewhat accidental, but were kind of defensive about it.

Tim Miller, a prominent Never Trump activist who worked on Sen. John McCain and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bushs presidential campaigns, dismissed the notion that Never Trumpers are only in green rooms.

But getting into media consumed by liberals is in some ways the only game in town for anti-Trump conservatives, since Fox News is very pro-Trump and features few critics of the president. And that platform to reach Democrats has been particularly useful for Never Trump conservatives because

The core argument of Never Trump Republicans goes something like this:

This argument may not be totally true. And the Never Trump narrative is clearly self-serving of course a group of conservatives who feel like they dont fit in the current Republican Party prefer a more conservative Democratic Party that they can align with.

But true or not, this narrative matters because it has mirrored and likely influenced the Democratic Partys post-Trump strategy. Since Trumps victory, Democrats have done a lot of soul-searching. Is the party too left? Or is it too establishment and centrist? Are Democrats ignorant of the concerns of the Americans who dont live on the coasts? Are they too focused on nonwhite voters or not focused on them enough?

Faced with these complicated questions in 2017 and 2018, Democrats took an approach that was broadly similar to the Never Trumpers attacking Trump as a uniquely dangerous threat to American democracy while resisting more liberal policy ideas and recruiting fairly centrist candidates in key congressional races. This approach led some Never Trumpers to get behind Democrats in the midterms moving beyond simply opposing Trump to fighting the Republican Party more broadly.

By at least early 2018, if not late 2017, there was general understanding that we needed to build a cross-partisan pro-democracy coalition that could prevail over Trumpism, which meant helping to unite Democrats, independents and principled conservatives, said Evan McMullin, the anti-Trump conservative who ran for president in 2016 and now runs a group called Stand Up Republic that focuses on defending democratic values.

Fortunately, Democratic leadership and many candidates in competitive districts naturally understood this opportunity and what it required, he added. Unifying candidates like Ben McAdams in Utah and Abigail Spanberger in Virginia were examples of those who attracted the support of principled conservatives and Republicans.

Its hard to quantify exactly how many anti-Trump conservatives backed Democrats in 2018 and how big a role they played in Democrats taking the House and winning many key governors races. But that temporary alliance between Never Trump Republicans and Democrats was strengthened in 2019 for two reasons. First, Never Trump Republicans found there was little appetite in the GOP for a primary challenge to Trump another illustration of their declining influence within the party. And second, in a final blow for some of them, Republicans largely stood by Trump even as details emerged about his efforts to pressure Ukraine to investigate the Bidens.

I was so sure there was going to be a handful of Republicans who were going to say it was clearly wrong, said Sarah Longwell, a longtime Republican strategist who was heavily involved in the effort to recruit a challenger to Trump. She added, Its been a slow realization that there isnt anybody left who is going to say anything.

In response, many of the Never Trumpers decided to get even deeper into Democratic politics, injecting themselves into the partys fractious presidential primary. And they had an obvious path to take: While Sens. Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren were pushing Democrats to take more liberal policy stands, several candidates were echoing the views of the Never Trumpers. Former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg was arguing that a Democratic candidate with fairly moderate policy ideas could win over Republicans in a general election, emphasizing his potential appeal to future former Republicans. Sen. Amy Klobuchar made similar arguments. Biden was publicly noting how much he likes the writings of The New York Timess Brooks, who was calling for Democrats to avoid going too far left.

When Sanders did well in the early primaries and seemed like he could win the Democratic nomination, Never Trump conservatives turned into a Never Bernie coalition. The Never Trumpers argument that Sanders couldnt win the general election, in part because anti-Trump Republicans (like themselves) wouldnt vote for him was compelling, particularly for a Democratic Party obsessed with beating Trump. And the Never Trumpers were already in the ideal positions to make these arguments and reach Democratic Party elites and primary voters the web pages of The Atlantic, The New York Times and The Washington Post and on MSNBC. Miller, in an anti-Trump publication called The Bulwark, described how he and other Republicans had failed to mobilize effectively against Trump in the 2016 GOP primary and laid out a step-by-step guide for how Democrats could avoid the same fate. (The piece was widely circulated on Twitter.)

Sanderss allies noticed all of this, of course, and started to publicly complain that MSNBC, in particular, was covering his candidacy too negatively. Its hard to prove that a lot of Democratic primary voters were Never Trumpers or that Democratic voters were particularly swayed by the groups warning about Sanders. But Never Trump conservatives were thrilled with Bidens victories on Super Tuesday and think they played a part in it.

One group that really mattered in the primaries were the high-information voters, the people who watch MSNBC, listen to The Daily, said Miller, referring to a popular New York Times podcast. A lot of these people went from Harris to Warren to Buttigieg and finally landed on Biden. For these voters, it was all an assessment of who could defeat Trump. For them, we [Never Trumpers] have a unique experience and insight.

Our message before and during the early primary elections was that principled conservatives and Republicans were a winnable bloc and could provide the decisive votes in general election swing states as long as Democrats didnt nominate a divisive, far-left candidate, McMullin said. Appropriately, Democratic voters prioritized replacing Trump in 2020 above other issues.

As I explained earlier, it is possible that 5 to 10 percent of the people who will vote for Biden in November backed either Romney in 2012 or Trump in 2016 and at some point identified as conservative or Republican. So while Never Trump conservatives are a smaller and less formal constituency in the Democratic Party than black voters, for example, some of them feel exiled from a Republican Party dominated by Trump, backed Democrats in the 2018 midterms and participated in the 2020 Democratic primaries. Michael Halle, a strategist on Buttigiegs campaign, said about 50 of the campaigns county precinct captains in Iowa were former Republicans who changed their party registration to become Democrats so they could participate in the caucuses and back the former mayor.

Those exiled Republicans are already mobilizing behind Biden in the general election. They are urging fellow conservatives not to support Rep. Justin Amash, who left the GOP in 2019 and last week announced an exploratory committee for a presidential run as the Libertarian candidate. They argue Amashs candidacy might increase Trumps chances of reelection.

So Never Trump conservatives can probably make some demands of Biden, just like any other constituency in the party, and he might feel some need to court them.

And that seems to be happening. The former vice president hinted recently that he might name some Republicans to his cabinet or transition team. Rumors of his consideration of Klobuchar for vice president is no doubt largely about her potential appeal to voters in the Midwest, but her more centrist politics also make her a favorite of some moderate Republicans.

I dont know that Biden needs a message for Never Trumpers most Never Trumpers are going to vote for Biden, Miller said. But, he added, I do think eventually the campaign should have a message for them.

Mostly, Never Trumpers simply want Biden to run a general election campaign similar to his primary run, emphasizing more moderate policies and appealing to more centrist voters.

I dont want him to make crazy sacrifices to the left that he doesnt need to make, Miller said.

The extent to which Never Trumpers become card-carrying members of the Democratic Party might have broad implications for the partys future. Are we seeing the birth of a new, ex-conservative faction in the Democratic Party or the resurgence of an existing one, with Never Trump conservatives joining with longtime Democratic moderates? Could that wing of the party become as strong as it was in the 1990s? The 2018 general elections and the 2020 primaries suggest more centrist Democratic candidates are winning among white, college-educated voters in the suburbs against both Trump Republicans but also Sanders Democrats. Thats an opportunity for Democrats to expand their coalition after all, white voters are the majority of American voters. Its also likely to be a challenge: The more liberal bloc of the Democratic Party increasingly favors big, transformative policies on economic issues that longtime moderate Democrats and ex-Republicans are unlikely to ever embrace.

On the other hand, the alliance between Never Trump conservatives and Democrats could be a fleeting one. If Trump loses badly in November, perhaps anti-Trump Republicans can regain influence in the party many of them still want to be in.

If he loses, there is a lot of room for a fight over the soul of the party, Longwell said.

If he wins, then its pretty definitive.

The rest is here:
How Never Trumpers Crashed The Democratic Party - FiveThirtyEight

Four Democrats running for Ernst’s seat in the Senate give their view on COVID-19 outbreak – KCCI Des Moines

Four Democrats running for Ernst's seat in the Senate give their view on COVID-19 outbreak

Updated: 11:27 PM CDT May 10, 2020

Hide TranscriptShow Transcript

CYNTHIA: SENATOR JONI ERNST IS RUNNING UNOPPOSED ON THE REPUBLICAN TICKET. SHE SAYS ONE OF THE GREATEST CHALLENGES WITH THE CORONAVIRUS RIGHT NOW IS TO ENSURE THE SAFETY OF OUR WORKERS AND OUR FOOD SUPPLY. SEN. ERNST: WERE WORKING WITH A NUMBER OF MEATPACKING FACILITIES IN THE STATE OF IOWA, OUR PORK PRODUCERS, TRYING TO FIND RELIEF FOR THEM, AS WELL. WE DO BELIEVE THAT AS WE MOVE FORWARD TO MY SHOULD THERE BE A PHASE 4, AND I THINK THERE WILL BE, WE MAY NEED TO MAKE SURE AGRICULTURE IS SUPPORTED IN THOSE EFFORTS AS WELL. CERTAINLY, WE ARE SEEING A LOT OF HARDSHIP ACROSS THE STATE OF IOWA BECAUSE OF COVID-19. CYNTHIA: THE 4 DEMOCRATIC CANDIDATES VYING FOR THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION TO TAKE ON ERNST IN THE FALL BELIEVE THE APPROACH IN DEALING WITH THE SPREAD OF THE VIRUS HAS BEEN HAPHAZARD. MR. FRANKEN: WEVE GOT TO RAMP UP THE AMOUNT OF TESTING. WE NEED TO ENSURE AND MANDATE THAT EMPLOYERS BRING ABOUT THE NECESSARY PPE AND CHANGE THE MANNER IN WHICH THEY ARE PRODUCING THEIR PRODUCTS OR SERVING THEIR CUSTOMERS TO ENSURE THAT WE PUT THE KABBALAH SEAN -- THE KIBOSH ON THIS DISEASE TO THE BEST OF OUR ABILITIES. MS. GRAHAM: TO ORDER THESE PLANTS TO STAY OPEN WHEN WE DONT HAVE SAFETY PRECAUTIONS FOR WORKERS IS ESSENTIALLY SAYING TO THEM, YOU CAN CHOOSE TO GET VERY ILL AND POTENTIALLY LOSE YOUR LIFE, OR YOU CAN GO TO WORK. YOU CAN CHOOSE POVERTY OR DEATH, I GUESS, IS YOUR CHOICE. I MEAN, ITS JUST RIDICULOUS. MS. GREENFIELD: IT STARTS WITH FOCUSING ON WORKERS AND FAMILIES. WE NEED MORE DIRECT PAYMENTS TO WORKERS WHO HAVE BEEN LAID OFF, OR LOST THEIR HOURS, SO THEY CAN PAY THE RENT, PUT MILK IN THE REFRIGERATOR, THE KINDS OF THINGS WE KNOW MOTHERS OF 4 NEED TO DO. MR. MAURO: AT THE STATE LEVEL, GOVERNOR REYNOLDS DOING HER BEST. I THINK SHE IS MISGUIDED IN THE SPEED OF TRYING TO OPEN THE STATE. AS SOMEONE WHO DEALS WITH HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN ASSETS AND AGGREGATES, I WORRY ABOUT THE ECONOMIC IMPLICATIONS OF OPENING TOO SOON. CYNTHIA: STILL, MOST SAY WE NEED TO PUT POLITICS ASIDE TO PUSH THROUGH THIS PANDEMIC. SEN. ERNST: STAY SAFE AND STAY STRONG, AND WE WILL GET THROUGH THIS TOGETHER. CYNTHIA: CYNTHIA FODOR, KC

Four Democrats running for Ernst's seat in the Senate give their view on COVID-19 outbreak

Updated: 11:27 PM CDT May 10, 2020

Four democrats are competing for the chance to take on Sen. Joni Ernst in the fall election. KCCI's chief political reporter Cynthia Fodor interviewed Mike Franken, Kimberly Graham, Theresa Greenfield and Eddie Mauro on their view of the COVID-19 outbreak.

Four democrats are competing for the chance to take on Sen. Joni Ernst in the fall election. KCCI's chief political reporter Cynthia Fodor interviewed Mike Franken, Kimberly Graham, Theresa Greenfield and Eddie Mauro on their view of the COVID-19 outbreak.

Originally posted here:
Four Democrats running for Ernst's seat in the Senate give their view on COVID-19 outbreak - KCCI Des Moines

Addressing inequities worsened by pandemic main issue for 5th Congressional District Democratic candidates – Martinsville Bulletin

Addressing the inequalities in the United States exacerbated by the coronavirus pandemic served as a major motivational force for Democrats running for Congress in central Virginia.

Political campaigns have had to adjust how they get the word out to voters while maintaining social distancing. So instead of a forum held at a high school or community center before a crowd of voters, the four Democrats participated in an online forum on Saturday.

The candidates all brought the issues they discussed, from health care to voting rights, back to the coronavirus pandemic as a reason to make bold improvements to policy at the federal level.

Voters will choose their nominee June 23. The Democrat will face Rep. Denver Riggleman (R-Nelson) or Bob Good, who are competing in a heated convention that will take place in the next several weeks at a date still to be determined. While the district is favorable to Republicans, House Democrats are targeting the seat.

The 5th Congressional District is Virginias largest district, stretching from Fauquier County to the North Carolina border and including the eastern slice of Henry County, Danville and Pittsylvania County, Franklin County and part of Bedford County.

Health care and economic inequality emerged as two of the most pressing issues during the forum, moderated by Del. Elizabeth Guzman, D-Prince William.

This coronavirus pandemic has told us one thing: 2020 will be the health care election, said Webb, who has made fixing the health care system the main focus of his campaign.

Webb, an internal medicine doctor, said making sure people can access affordable health care is more complicated than a three-word slogan. He worked on a White House health care team during the Obama administration to help implement the Affordable Care Act. He said the country can do better than having health insurance tied to employers, and there should be a public option.

Weve got to fix private insurance so were putting people over profits, Webb said.

Huffstetler and Russo both supported a proposal U.S. Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.) has reintroduced before called Medicare X, which would create a new public option for health insurance. Lesinksi also supported a public option.

This pandemic has clearly demonstrated to all of us that every American must have access to health care, Russo said.

The candidates said the pandemic has fueled a large growth in telemedicine. But Lesinski said people in rural areas dont have that same access because they lack broadband.

He said that as the country emerges from the coronavirus crisis and tries to rebuild its economy, rural America will fall behind unless it has the broadband needed to attract employers and to allow for people to work from home.

Its the rural electrification issue of our time, Lesinski said.

Huffstetler emphasized his familys working class roots and said his campaign is focused addressing economic inequality. He said the economy has been changing, and people dont always keep the same job for more than 30 years, and workers need to upgrade their skills. Hed like to work on developing a program so community colleges and industries partner together to maintain a skilled workforce.

My legislative priorities are making sure that when people work hard in this country, the country has their back, Huffstetler said.

Russo said the federal government did not prepare for the pandemic as it should have done. Citing her own background as a Marine officer training Marines and an intelligence officer learning lessons from past wars and applying them to the future, she said shes equipped to work on steering the country out of the crisis and preparing for future ones.

Its never been more clear that its going to take bold leadership to guide this country out of this crisis in a fair and just manner, Russo said.

Lesinski connected the poor planning for a viral outbreak to the lack of bold action on climate change. Climate change is a legislative priority for Lesinski, who said reducing the countrys carbon footprint and shifting to renewable energy will create new jobs.

Its a canary in the coal mine for fighting climate change, because if we dont get on this now, were going to lose a lot more lives, he said.

The candidates all agreed that the pandemic has highlighted the need to expand voting rights. Huffstetler said there should be automatic voter registration when people get their drivers license. He said working people cant always make it to the polls on Election Day, so he said being able to vote absentee without providing an excuse is essential.

There is no reason under the sun we should be making it harder to vote, Huffstetler said.

Lesinki said that even though states are making progress in expanding voting rights, more needs to be done at the federal level. He referenced the federal court decision this week to waive the witness requirement to cast absentee ballots in the June primaries in Virginia.

Republicans tried to retain the witness requirement, citing the risk of voter fraud. There is no evidence of widespread voter fraud with voting by mail.

The strategy here clearly is voter suppression, voter suppression of those individuals the Republican Party feels is going to be a continued threat to them winning or gaining a majority, Lesinski said.

During the last election, Riggleman defeated Democrat Leslie Cockburn by about 20,000 votes. Webb raised the issue of 38,000 black residents who arent registered to vote in the district, and more than 30,000 registered black voters didnt vote in the last election.

I think when we field the full team as Democrats, when we expand the electorate, we win, Webb said.

Originally posted here:
Addressing inequities worsened by pandemic main issue for 5th Congressional District Democratic candidates - Martinsville Bulletin

Disqualified Hong Kong democrat challenges 2018 by-election ban as two other ousted lawmakers told to repay wages – Hong Kong Free Press

Ousted Hong Kong pro-democracy legislator Lau Siu-lai challenged an electoral officers decision to bar her from running in the 2018 Legislative Council Kowloon West by-election last Thursday.

In October 2018, Returning Officer Franco Kwok Wai-fun said Laus by-election nomination was invalid, arguing that she had backed calls for self-determination and thus would not genuinely uphold the Basic Law.

Lau had hoped to salvage her seat in the legislature, after being stripped of her status in 2017 following a row over protests she staged during her oath-taking. Five other opposition legislators were also disqualified. The controversy later led to Beijing interpreting Article 104 of the Basic Law, which requires lawmakers to swear allegiance to the HKSAR solemnly.

During the High Court hearing last Thursday, Laus counsel Paul Shieh argued that a persons political standpoint was subject to change, but the returning officer never enquired as to whether Laus stance had evolved. Shieh also cited another ousted legislator Edward Yiu, who was allowed to enter the by-election after clarifying his stance with the officer.

Justice Anderson Chow observed that Lau was denied a chance to explain her stance. Johnny Mok, representing the electoral officer, argued that there had not been evidence to suggest that Lau had changed her stance within a short period of time. He added Lau had the responsibility to inform the returning officer should there be a change, instead of the officer making an enquiry.

The court had adjourned the case to another date for verdict.

On Friday, Lau announced on Facebook that she would not be running in the upcoming Legislative Council election, which is tentatively set to take place on September 6.

202058

She said she wanted to reserve more time to serve her affiliated party the Labour Party and other parts of civil society, as well as to coordinate with the pro-democracy camps plan to secure more than half of the seats in the legislature.

Fighting for democracy is the common aspiration of every Hongkonger I hope everyone can be united, Lau wrote.

Another two democrats who were thrown out of the legislature Yau Wai-ching and Baggio Leung were ordered by a court last Tuesday to each repay HK$930,000 they received in advance as wages and subsidies before their disqualification.

The court had ruled in favour of the Legislative Council Commission after the former Youngspiration legislators failed to appear at the hearings. According to local media, the commission said Leung and Yau submitted their defence in 2018, but did not respond to the commissions request to provide further information.

Last year, the commission asked to combine Leung and Yaus cases but the duo did not attend the hearing. They also did not provide an explanation for their absence as required by the court. The commission argued that the ousted lawmakers had not actively fought their claims and the Registar decided to reject Leung and Yaus defence.

Leung told local media that the commission had refused to accept his return of the supplies he bought and later pursued to recover his salary and subsidies. He slammed the authorities as shifting the goalposts to disqualify legislators and using procedural tricks to suppress them.

If I still waste time and effort to respond to this, I think it is unreasonable, Leung said, adding that he has owed more than HK$4 million legal fees. He said: So for a small creditor like the Legislative Council Commission, [they] may have to wait in line.

Read the original post:
Disqualified Hong Kong democrat challenges 2018 by-election ban as two other ousted lawmakers told to repay wages - Hong Kong Free Press