Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

Top Democratic strategist pleads with party to abandon impeachment – Fox News

A top Democratic campaign consultant and former pollster for President Bill Clinton is pleading with partyleaders to abandon plans to vote on the impeachment of President Trumpor risk electoral disaster.

In an interview on "Fox and Friends" last week, Trump predicted that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi D-Calif., would not see the impeachmentprocess through to a vote.

"No, I dont expect it,"he said at the conclusion of two weeks of impeachment hearings, "I think its very hard for them to impeach you when they have absolutely nothing."

The Hill reportedon Saturday that aHouse Democratic leadership aidecalled it fantasy land to think that there wouldn't be a vote on the House floor.

Democratic strategist Doug Schoen suggested that he hopes that the president is right.

"I am praying for censure. It canturn what could be a loss into a certain victory," he said,arguing thatPelosishould forgo impeachment and instead vote to publicly reprimand the president.

"While the Democratic electorate is almost unanimously in favor of impeachment, swing voters in swing states... are decidedly mixed, if not negative,"the polling expert explained on Fox Nation's "Deep Dive."

"And given that states like Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Florida -- ones the Democrats have to win in some combination to win the presidential election, it's hard for me to see that impeachment is anything but a very problematic issue for the party," he argued.

Paradoxically, Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett, who has been harshly critical of the Democrats' impeachment effort, said that he hopesthat the House votes and moves theprocess to the Senate.

"I'm praying for a trial because it will boomerang terribly on the Democrats and only ensure the president's reelection come November," said Jarrett.

"Let's start exposing some of these malignant actions by people, not just [House Intelligence Committee Chairman]Adam Schiff, and the whistleblower, but others involved in this as well," Jarrett contended. "This is the witch hunt, the sequel. And it's ten times as preposterous as the original Trump/Russian collusion hoax."

COULD PELOSI ABANDON IMPEACHMENT EFFORTS?: LEGAL ANALYST PREDICTS SHE MAY

Jarrett argued that if the Senate wereto take up a trial of the president,Republicans would be in a position to raise questions over former Vice President Joe Biden's involvementin Ukraine policy, as well as his sonHunter's work with a notoriously corrupt Ukrainian company.

'There's an old saying -- the recoil is more dangerous than the projectile. And the recoil here is Hunter Biden and Joe Biden," continued Jarrett. "Ithink the more we find out about the machinations of Hunter Biden, who appears increasingly like a prodigious grifter, this is only going to damage his father in his quest to become the next president of United States. I mean, Lindsey Graham is vowing an investigation of the activities of Hunter Biden and by implication, Joe Biden's actions in a quid pro quo."

Schoen agreed with Jarrett that Joe and Hunter Biden's behavior appeared to have been wildly inappropriate.

"The idea that Burisma,Hunter Biden and Joe Biden didn't know what was going on is ridiculous," said Schoen. "To me,Joe Biden turned the other cheek, turned the other eye,put a bag over his head, whatever. Why did he do that? He had a troubled son who landed a big, lucrative gig, and he was hoping against hope that he could skate through. Well, we're seeing now that that's not the case. I don't know that there was anything that was done that was illegal. It sure smells and it smells really bad."

Schoen concluded that his party may regret devoting so much time and energy to the impeachment process.

"I also think that we Democrats are losing a huge opportunity because on issues like gun violence prevention, climate change, health care, we have an advantage. We won the midterm elections in 2018 because of the utilization and in part of those issues. And to not take advantage of what people care about, which is real-world day to day problems of our quality of life, and instead, just keep focusing on impeachment. If I were recommending to the Democrats what to do. I'd say vote for censure, get it and move on."

To watch all of"Deep Dive"go toFox Nationand sign up today.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR A FOX NATION FREE TRIAL

Fox Nationprograms are viewable on-demand and from your mobile device app, but only for Fox Nation subscribers.Go to Fox Nationto start a free trial and watch the extensive library from Tomi Lahren, Pete Hegseth, Abby Hornacek, Laura Ingraham, Ainsley Earhardt, Greg Gutfeld, Judge Andrew Napolitano and many more of your favorite Fox News personalities.

Read more here:
Top Democratic strategist pleads with party to abandon impeachment - Fox News

Pete Buttigiegs PAC Was Supposed To Help Elect Democrats. It Mostly Touted Him. – HuffPost

Pete Buttigieg launched a political action committee in June 2017 to relatively little fanfare. The mayor of South Bend, Indiana, at the time was still a minor political figure. He had made an unsuccessful run for Democratic National Committee chairman and been the subject of some positive press from national columnists, but he was little-known nationally.

His PAC, dubbed Hitting Home, would mobilize resources to elect Democrats, at every level and in communities both red and blue, who will put the lived experiences of Americans front and center, Buttigieg wrote.

We will support candidates who focus on showing voters what we are for not just what we are against and understand how to do so in terms of our everyday lives, he continued.

Two years later, as his 2020 presidential campaign began to take off, Buttigieg shut down the group. And it hadnt come close to living up to his billing of its aims.

The PAC had done relatively little to help Democrats during the 2018 midterm elections, when the party waged its hard-fought battle to win control of the U.S. House. But it had paid significant sums to a host of Democratic consultants and staffers to promote Buttigiegs image. Of the slightly more than $400,000 Buttigieg raised for the PAC, it donated just $37,000 to other Democratic candidates.

At the same time, the PAC paid nearly $70,000 to Lis Smith, who served as Buttigiegs spokesperson and became the communications director for his presidential bid. Another $27,500 went to Michael Schmuhl, who served as the PACs treasurer and is now Buttigiegs campaign manager. The PACs finance director received $34,500. A top Democratic media consulting firm was paid $28,500.

The PAC helped Buttigieg catapult from a well-credentialed mayor of a 101,000-population college town to a leading contenderfor the nations highest office. It served as a springboard that had more to do with personal promotion than it did with aiding other Democrats.

Buttigieg has now entered the top tier of Democrats seeking the presidential nomination: Polls show him doing well in the early-voting states of Iowa and New Hampshire, though his weakness with voters of color means he trails the leading trio of Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren, Vermont Sen. Bernie Sandersand former Vice President Joe Biden in most national surveys.

In a statement, Buttigiegs campaign attributed the PACs low rate of support for other Democrats to a failure to raise money. Some of the PACs administrative costs were similar to those of other presidential contenders: Buttigieg spent about $77,000 on accountants, compliance and legal fees involved with setting up this group, while Bidens PAC spent about $67,000 and Harriss group spent nearly $90,000.

The committee was created before Pete was a national figure and the PAC brought in less money than envisioned, Buttigieg spokesman Sean Savett said. As a result, a higher percentage of the spending went to administrative and legal costs. As a leading candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination, Pete remains committed to building the party bench and has put forward a platform that can keep the House, take back the Senate, and elect Democrats up and down the ballot when hes elected next year.

During the time the PAC was in operation, Buttigieg received glowing coverage aplenty in the national press: His wedding was written up by The New York Times, Rolling Stone profiled him and he sat for lengthy interviews with PBS and MTV.

Buttigieg seeded the PAC with money left over from his unsuccessful bid for the DNC chairmanship. Throughout the PACs existence, it was able to take in unlimited donations, including a $50,000 contribution from Christel Dehaan, a prominent Republican-turned-Democratic donor in Indiana and major backer of charter schools. (Buttigieg has called for more oversight of for-profit charter schools and suggested a pause in the expansion of charter schools.)More than a third of its funds came from either corporate donations or individual gifts above the standard federal limit.

The PAC donated between $500 and $2,000 to 23 Democrats running for federal offices, 14 of whom won their elections. Many of them, like Buttigieg, were either openly gay (now-Kansas Rep. Sharice Davids) or military veterans (Kentuckys Amy McGrath, New York Rep. Max Rose) or both (Texas Gina Ortiz Jones.) Only two were incumbents: Indiana Sen. Joe Donnelly (who lost) and Iowa Rep. David Loebsack (who won).

Several of the other Democratic White House candidates who had, in virtually all cases, higher political profiles and decades to develop national fundraising bases donated far more. Warren, for instance, donated $10,000 to all 50 state Democratic parties, plus additional donations to individual candidates. California Sen. Kamala Harris PAC donated over $700,000. And Bidens PAC forked over more than $600,000 to other Democrats.

REAL LIFE. REAL NEWS. REAL VOICES.

Help us tell more of the stories that matter from voices that too often remain unheard.

See original here:
Pete Buttigiegs PAC Was Supposed To Help Elect Democrats. It Mostly Touted Him. - HuffPost

‘No one out there’: could Democrats’ lack of star power see Trump re-elected by default? – The Guardian

Too old. Too young. Too white. Too leftwing. Anxiety over Democrats failure to find a standout candidate is raising fears that, despite astounding unpopularity and potential impeachment, Donald Trump could win re-election by default.

The Democratic primarys top tier of candidates does not include a person of colour even in the biggest and most diverse field in history. The leader of national opinion polls turned 77 this week and delivered another stumbling debate performance while fending off questions about his sons foreign business dealings.

The poll leader in Iowa, which will get the first say, is the 37-year-old mayor of a small city who in some surveys is polling close to zero with African American voters. Two more septuagenarians have seen their momentum stall amid criticism that their healthcare reforms are too radical and unaffordable.

And then there are two last-minute would-be saviours: an ageing billionaire from New York and a former east coast governor who this week cancelled a campaign event when only two people showed up.

Watching it all with glee are Trump and Republicans, hardly able to believe their luck that they might not have to win next years election so much as watch Democrats lose it, just as Hillary Clinton did by failing to motivate turnout in crucial states in 2016. This weeks debate in Atlanta showed that the party is struggling again to find a nominee as inspiring as Barack Obama.

When I ask my students, is there anyone on that debate stage tonight who you see as being presidential, most of them say no, theres no one out there, said Monika McDermott, a political science professor, at Fordham University in New York. And theyre political junkies so they know as much as any of us do.

So I think that Democrats have a real problem here in that they have a bunch of candidates who appeal to different groups for different reasons but they dont have a clear leader in the group, and thats part of the problem.

Joe Biden, the former vice-president who heads national polls, needed a big night in Atlanta but was widely panned, especially for some unfortunate word choices. Speaking about sexual violence, he said: So we have to just change the culture, period. And keep punching at it and punching it and punching at it.

And boasting about his support among African Americans, Biden listed the only black African American woman who had ever been elected to the United States Senate as one of his endorsers. The California senator Kamala Harris threw her hands in the air and said: Nope. Thats not true. The other one is here.

Pundits were withering. Lawrence ODonnell, a host on the MSNBC network, described it as a colossal gaffe unlike any other Ive seen in a debate performance because its literally about a person whos standing on the stage who he in this moment has forgotten exists. The Washington Post noted that Bidens debate performances are almost unfailingly shaky.

This comes against a backdrop of Biden last month releasing a weak third-quarter fundraising report and falling behind in polls in Iowa and New Hampshire, which votes second. The man who was at Obamas side for eight years is, commentators say, on an irresistible slide.

For those nervous about another electoral disaster for Democrats in 2020, the canaries in the coal mine are Deval Patrick, the former governor or Massachusetts, and Michael Bloomberg, the super-rich ex-mayor of New York, who either have entered or seem poised to enter the race at the last minute a sure sign that Biden is perceived as weak and flagging.

Speaking at the New York Foreign Press Center on Friday, McDermott said: Bidens lack of leadership is what caused Deval Patrick and Bloomberg [to enter]. I dont think those two will have any effect on the race ... But people are worried about Joe Biden, that hes too old, that hes been around long, not a fresh face, not very exciting to voters. So, yes, the Democrats have a problem.

Bloomberg, 77, a former Republican, and Patrick, who governed Massachusetts, are also thought to be motivated by concerns that Senators Bernie Sanders, 78, and Elizabeth Warren, 70, progressives who want to eliminate private health insurance and introduce far reaching structural change, will be easy to demonise as dangerous socialists in a general election.

But the rescue mission is failing to get off the launch pad. Bloomberg has filed federal papers declaring himself a candidate but is still hesitating about becoming the 18th in the field. His establishment credentials and vast wealth are also spectacularly out of step with a party eager to address Americas cavernous inequality.

Bloomberg has also issued an apology for a stop and frisk policy that targeted African American and Latino men during his 12-year tenure as mayor of New York. Charles Blow, a columnist at the New York Times, was not impressed. This is a necessary apology, but a hard one to take, coming only now, as he considers a run for the Democratic nomination, a nomination that is nearly impossible to secure without the black vote, he wrote. It feels like the very definition of pandering.

Patrick scrapped a campaign event at Morehouse College in Atlanta when hardly anyone turned up and a photo of row after row of empty chairs circulated on social media. As a brutally symbolic contrast with the fervent crowds at Trump rallies, it was hard to beat.

Instead, the man of the moment is Pete Buttigieg, the mayor of South Bend, Indiana, who has leaped to the top of some polls in Iowa and New Hampshire and gave an assured performance in this weeks debate. But he is aiming to become the youngest (and first openly gay) president ever elected and a series of missteps on race including using a stock photo taken in Kenya to promote his agenda for African Americans - have left many voters of colour deeply sceptical.

A day after the debate, Obama pleaded with Democratic donors to chill out about the candidates, but gin up about the prospect of rallying behind the eventual nominee. He perhaps senses a drawn-out primary process could leave the party badly divided while Trump, an incumbent buoyed by a strong economy and formidable fundraising, could cruise to victory next November just by being Trump.

Not even the impeachment inquiry, which this week heard evidence that he attempted to bribe Ukraine for his own political gain, appears likely to derail him. It has been used by his campaign to raise millions of dollars. Republicans and rightwing media remain loyal. The bottom line: Trumps rightwing media wall has held, observed CNNs Reliable Sources newsletter.

Indeed, Trump is showing resilience in the polls. A survey of 801 registered voters by the Marquette Law School in the all-important state of Wisconsin over 13-17 November showed only the long shot Cory Booker beating Trump in a head-to-head match up (45% to 44%). The president led Biden 47% to 44%, Sanders 48% to 45%, Warren 48% to 43% and Buttigieg 47% to 39%.

John Zogby, a Democratic pollster, said: In most polls nationwide and in the key states, the president is competitive against every one of the major candidates. The Democrats are still kind of fumbling for a message: its really not enough to be against Trump. Fifty-seven per cent say they will definitely not vote for Trump but that doesnt mean they will come out to vote.

Zogby added: Trump could very well win this, not only because he did the first time in an unconventional way, but because voters are very clear they want something worthwhile voting for against Trump; otherwise key groups will not show up to vote in sufficient numbers.

Read more from the original source:
'No one out there': could Democrats' lack of star power see Trump re-elected by default? - The Guardian

Democratic Party Beliefs | Republican Views

The Democratic Party was organized by Thomas Jefferson in the late 1700s. The Democratic National Committee Platform is based around a set of common beliefs that the party as a whole stands for. The platform states, Our vision is simple. We want an America that gives all Americans the chance to live out their dreams and achieve their God-given potential. We want an America that is still the worlds strongest force for peace and freedom. And we want an America that is coming together around our enduring values, instead of drifting apart. One of the strongest beliefs of the Democratic Party is that of equality on all fronts. Democrats believe in equal opportunity despite race, religion, gender, or sexual orientation. They also believe in equal educational opportunity for all. They believe in protecting the environment from those who would exploit it for its resources due to the belief that the destruction of our ecosystem would mean the destruction of mankind. They believe in a larger tax gap between classes, as well as a significant decrease in government spending. They believe in a womans right to choose whether or not to have an abortion, as well as universal access to health care. Democratic Party beliefs are centered around the hope to renew a sense of community among Americans to improve opportunity for the general public, stating Todays Democratic Party is determined to renew Americas most basic bargain: Opportunity to every American, and responsibility from every American. And todays Democratic Party is determined to reawaken the great sense of American community.

The Democratic Party supports full equality under the law for same-sex couples. This includes not only the right to marriage, but also the right to the same financial benefits as all married couples. However, Democrats believe that gay marriage should be left a state issue. They disagree with having a federal mandate for legalizing gay marriage as much as they disagree with a federal ban on gay marriage, stating, in our country, marriage has been defined at the state level for 200 years, and we believe it should continue to be defined there. This being said, Democrats would prefer to see gay marriage legalized in every state, stating, we oppose discriminatory federal and state constitutional amendments and other attempts to deny equal protection of the laws to committed same-sex couples who seek the same respect and responsibilities as other married couples. We supportthe passage of the Respect for Marriage Act. Democrats also believe that religious entities should be allowed to make decisions about marriage as a religious sacrament on their own, due to the separation of Church and state. The 2012 Democratic Party Platform states, we support the right of all families to have equal respect, responsibilities, and protections under the law. We support marriage equality and support the movement to secure equal treatment under law for same-sex couples.

The Democratic Parties opinion on immigration is based on the idea that the United States is a country built around immigrants, and as such it should value and support its present and future immigrants. The 2012 Democratic Party Platform states, the Democratic Party stands for comprehensive immigration reform that intelligently prioritizes our countrys security and economic needs. Democrats believe that in order to embrace and allow for the continuation of the diversity in our country, we need to fix our broken immigration system. They believe in providing a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants, especially those who were brought here as children. They wish to greatly reform the current immigration laws, stating that todays immigration laws do not reflect our values or serve our security, and we will work for real reform. The solution is not to establish a massive new status of second-class workers; that betrays our values and hurts all working people. Undocumented immigrants within our borders who clear a background check, work hard and pay taxes should have a path to earn full participation in America. Democrats do not believe that just any illegal immigrant should be provided amnesty or a path to citizenship. They state that undocumented workers who are in good standing must admit that they broke the law, pay taxes and a penalty, learn English, and get right with the law before they can get in line to earn their citizenship. Democrats believe in providing priority to immigrants who already have family in the United States, in order to reunite families more quickly. They also hope to offer more English-language and civic education classes so immigrants can assume all the rights and responsibilities of citizenship. They support a reform of the INS, so that it can provide better services to immigrants. They support investing resources in the INS to reduce the wait time for immigrants, which currently sits at approximately two years, to a more reasonable timeline such as three months. Democrats believe in reforming asylum policies, believing that we should have equitable asylum policies that treat people the same whether they have fled violence from the Right and Left. They believe that immigrants are currently facing a lack of due process protections, and wish to see these protections restored, so that immigrants cannot face deportation due to minor offenses, and are eligible to receive safety net services supported by their tax dollars.

Democratic views on the death penalty revolve around the opinion that it must only be used in certain cases. The 2012 Democratic Party Platform stated, we believe that the death penalty must not be arbitrary. DNA testing should be used in all appropriate circumstances, defendants should have effective assistance of counsel, and the administration of justice should be fair and impartial. Previous Democratic platforms have stated, in all death row cases, we encourage thorough post-conviction reviews. We will put the rights of victims and families first again. And we will push for more crime prevention, to stop the next generation of crime before its too late. As a party, Democrats believe that stricter punishment, such as the death penalty, work as a preventative measure to keep crime from happening to begin with. Democrats strongly support the death penalty in cases of those who have murdered policemen and terrorists. Bill Clinton and Al Gore fought to have this punishment put into place for these criminals. The party is currently divided on whether or not the death penalty should be applied to all convicted murderers. However, not all Democrats share this view. Lieutenant Governor Gavin Newsome of California says, I think we should repeal the death penalty. Its not a deterrent; there are racial components to it. Martin OMalley, governor of Maryland, believes similarly. He says Its wasteful. Its ineffective. It doesnt work to reduce violent crime.

The Democratic Party believes firmly in a womans right to decide whether or not to abort a pregnancy. The Democratic views on abortion strongly support Roe vs. Wade, and include a woman being given the right to abort a pregnancy regardless of whether or not she is able to pay for it. The party strongly opposes any efforts or legislation that might undermine this right, stating, abortion is an intensely personal decision between a woman, her family, her doctor, and her clergy; there is no place for politicians or government to get in the way. However, the party also supports initiatives to decrease the number of unintended or unwanted pregnancies. Because of this they support sex education programs that explain birth control options and how couples can obtain them. They also support programs such as Planned Parenthood that help those in need of birth control options reduce the cost and feel comfortable asking questions. They do hope to reduce the number of abortions being performed, but not at the cost of a mothers right to choose. The party has stated, our goal is to make abortion more rare, not more dangerous. We support contraceptive research, family planning, comprehensive family life education, and policies that support healthy childbearing. They believe that health care should be provided to expecting mothers who are in financial need whether they choose to abort or to carry their child to term. They believe that every pregnant woman should be supported, by providing affordable health care and ensuring the availability of and access to programs that help women during pregnancy and after the birth of a child, including caring adoption programs. They believe that the way to join 36 other industrialized nations in making sure everyone has access to affordable health care is with health care reform. They hope to do this by fixing the prescription drug program and investing in stem cell and other medical research. On the topic of stem cell research, Democrats state, we believe in investing in life saving stem cell and other medical research that offers real hope for cures and treatment for millions of Americans.

The Democratic Party is dedicated to reforming the educational system in the United States. Democratic views on education include tax benefits and reformed financial aid programs for college tuition, saving and creating more teaching jobs, expand education options for low-income youth, and revamping standardized testing to test more complex skills. Democrats hope to turn around the public school system and make it more successful and sustainable. They hope to expand public school options for low-income children by creating and maintaining more magnet schools, charter schools, teacher-led schools, and career academies. They also hope to increase the number of teachers and the respect that teachers receive, to improve the quality of instruction that kids are receiving. In their 2012 platform, Democrats stated, Because there is no substitute for a great teacher at the head of a classroom, the President helped school districts save more than 400,000 educator jobs. We Democrats honor our nations teachers. If we want high-quality education for all our kids, we must listen to the people who are on the front lines. The President has laid out a plan to prevent more teacher layoffs while attracting and rewarding great teachers. This includes raising standards for the programs that prepare our teachers, recognizing and rewarding good teaching, and retaining good teachers. We also believe in carefully crafted evaluation systems that give struggling teachers a chance to succeed and protect due process. The Democratic Party supports public school choice, including charter schools and magnet schools that meet the same high standards as other schools. They believe that the alternative of pushing private school vouchers takes dollars away from public schools, making school choice the far better option. They hope to build new schools and provide them with the technology and equipment for a modern education to fulfill this goal. The Democratic Party hopes to see college within the reach of every student. They took on banks to reform the student loan program and cut out the middleman in student lending, allowing them to better and more directly invest in students. They also doubled the investment in Pell Grant scholarships and created the American Opportunity Tax Credit. Democrats believe that these financial moves will make college more accessible to children from lower-income families. They also hope to create programs that will allow students to manage their federal student loans so that their payment is as low ass 10 percent of their monthly income. The 2012 Democratic Platform stated, We Democrats also recognize the economic opportunities created by our nations community colleges. That is why the President has invested in community colleges and called for additional partnerships between businesses and community colleges to train two million workers with the skills they need for good jobs waiting to be filled. Furthermore, the Democratic Party would like to see federal loan interest rates reduced greatly. Democrats hope to use standardized testing to advance education, but in a different way than theyre being used now. They believe the current form of standardized testing advances bureaucracy more than it advances education, and hope to use testing to advance real learning, not undermine it, by developing high-quality assessments that measure the complex skills students need to develop. We will make sure that federal law operates with high standards and common sense, not just bureaucratic rigidity.

The Democratic Party wishes to see a stricter regulation of firearms, especially assault weapons. The Democratic views on gun control are centered around the belief that the right to own firearms is subject to reasonable regulation. The Democratic Party hopes to focus on effective enforcement of existing laws, especially strengthening our background check system, andwork together to enact commonsense improvementslike reinstating the assault weapons ban and closing the gun show loopholeso that guns do not fall into the hands of those irresponsible, law-breaking few. The 2012 Democratic Party Platform did explain that the Democratic Party does not wish to override the second amendment. Instead, they wish to see gun control reform that they believe lies within the scope of the second amendment, stating, We recognize that the individual right to bear arms is an important part of the American tradition, and we will preserve Americans Second Amendment right to own and use firearms. The Democratic Party hopes to see a good deal of gun control legislation in the future. Their goals include to incorporate mental-health criteria into the existing law regarding who can and cannot own guns. They hope to expand the federal prohibition on gun sales to include those convicted of misdemeanor stalking. They also hope to prohibit gun sales to those receiving involuntary mental health services on an outpatient basis, if a court deems them dangerous. Many states have already implemented these restrictions on a state-level basis. Democrats also hope to see states grant money to help local authorities bolster gun-violence prevention programs.

The Democratic view on health care is based around the idea that accessible, affordable, high quality health care is part of the American promise, that Americans should have the security that comes with good health care. Democrats believe that no American should have to face financial destitution because they fall ill or get injured, stating that no one should have to choose between taking their child to a doctor and paying the rent. They are firm supporters of laws that prevent insurance companies from covering Americans with pre-existing medical conditions, capping or cancelling coverage, or charging women more due simply to gender. They also support allowing young Americans who are just entering the workforce to stay on their parents health care plans. They believe in preserving Medicare benefits for seniors. Democrats are strong supporters of the Affordable Care Act and of strengthening Medicare. Democrats stand in support of stem cell research, as well as other medical research, as a means to develop cures and treatments. They also support tax credits to businesses who offer quality, affordable healthcare, and tax credits to Americans who are approaching 65 and are not working, so that they can continue to afford healthcare until their Medicare benefits come into effect.

One of the most well-known Democratic contributions to healthcare reform is the Affordable Care Act. President Obama signed the Affordable Care Act in 2010. This act greatly reformed healthcare, and is strongly supported by the Democratic Party. Democrats state that the Affordable Care Act has already begun to end the worst insurance company abuses, and that like Medicare before it, the Affordable Care Act lays a new foundation for our country that will bring additional security and stability to the American people for generations to come. Besides providing benefits to all Americans, Democrats consider the end to discrimination against pre-existing conditions to be the most important aspects of the Affordable Care Act. The act also increased the transparency of the insurance industry. Democrats state the insurance industry will be more transparent than ever, with summaries of coverage and premiums available for every plan in the marketplace. They pride themselves on the fact that it is reducing the cost of healthcare to middle- and lower-class Americans, and have called the act the largest middle-class tax cut for health care in history. Democrats believe that the tax benefits offered to small businesses will offset the costs of increasing coverage, and will minimize the economical impact that the act has on these businesses and the economy as a whole.

They believe that the benefits of the Affordable Care Act will also reduce the cost of healthcare to the federal government, reducing our deficit by more than $1 trillion in the next two decades alone. They support this supposition with the fact that since the law passed, health care costs are growing at the slowest rate on record stretching back to 1960. They also believe that the healthcare reform is benefiting Medicare, stating that it strengthens Medicare by reducing fraud, improving quality of care, and closing the Medicare donut hole gap in seniors prescription drug coverage.

As stated in the 2012 Democratic platform, Democrats believe that Medicare is a sacred compact with our seniors. Democrats support preserving and strengthening the current institution of Medicare. They believe that Americas seniors have earned their Medicare and Social Security through a lifetime of hard work and personal responsibility, and should therefore reap the benefits of those earnings. They support President Obamas plans to preserve Medicare. They oppose efforts to privatize Medicare, as well as plans to voucherize it. They also oppose plans to raise the amount of money seniors are paying into Medicare.

They are strongly in support of reforming Medicare part D, so that it ensures better coverage of prescription drugs to seniors and does more to bring down the cost of prescription drugs, as it currently does very little to lower these costs. Democrats believe that drug companies should not be allowed to change prescription costs more often than seniors can change their Medicare D plans. Democrats believe that the current structure and failings of Medicare D are what is driving seniors into HMOs. They believe that elderly Americans deserve a real prescription drug benefit one that uses the governments purchasing power to lower costs and ensures access to new therapies for their illnesses.

The Democratic Party believes that there are less aggressive ways to handle these threats than many that have been used in the past. Democratic Views on homeland security include combating terrorism without compromising the Constitution with the use of torture, always attempting to solve conflict through diplomacy and using military force only when necessary, increasing benefits for military members, and increasing border security measures. Democrats would also like to see military members trained to handle more modern-day technological threats. Democrats believe in utilizing diplomacy over military force whenever possible. This is one of the greatest areas where Republican Homeland Security beliefs differ from those of Democrats. Democrats believe that excessive use of military force only encourages terrorists to use force against us in return, perpetuating the cycle of violence. They believe that diplomacy should be attempted in every situation possible, and military force should be used as a final resort if diplomacy does not work. Even when the nations security is threatened, Democrats are against using excessive military force, and instead wish to see force used only to the extent necessary to protect the nations people. They also believe in protecting the country through means beyond military strength, stating, in addition to our military might, we must deploy all that is in Americas arsenal our diplomacy, our intelligence system, our economic power, and the appeal of our values and ideas. Democrats also believe that the United States dependence on Middle Eastern oil is a matter of homeland security, and that to safeguard our freedom and ensure our nations future, we must end our dependence on Mideast oil. Democrats do believe in maintaining the military in order to be prepared if force becomes necessary. They wish to see the military modernized, so that soldiers are equipped to meet the threats of the 21st century.

See the original post:
Democratic Party Beliefs | Republican Views

House Democrats Inch Closer To Impeachment : NPR

Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., speaks to activists gathered Thursday in Washington, D.C., to deliver more than 10 million petition signatures to Congress urging the House to start impeachment proceedings against President Trump. Mark Wilson/Getty Images hide caption

Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., speaks to activists gathered Thursday in Washington, D.C., to deliver more than 10 million petition signatures to Congress urging the House to start impeachment proceedings against President Trump.

If House Democrats ultimately begin impeachment proceedings against President Trump, last week will be remembered as one of the pivotal turning points.

Trump's decision to invoke executive privilege over the full report by special counsel Robert Mueller is prompting impeachment skeptics like Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, D-Mo., to reconsider.

"I have to be honest with you, I once said I would be the last person standing against impeachment, and now, I'm squatting," Cleaver told NPR.

While some Democrats hope the Judiciary Committee's decision to hold Attorney General William Barr in contempt will force the administration back to the negotiation table, White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders made clear the president will not budge on his executive privilege claim over the Mueller report. "This is fully consistent with that precedent and it is fully consistent with the president actually upholding the law," Sanders told reporters last week.

The administration's apparent hard line on this is giving impeachment proceedings a new urgency. "I think you have to look at impeachment as a mechanism to get what we want," said Rep. Raul Grijalva, D-Ariz.

More Democrats are warming to the idea that beginning impeachment proceedings could be an option if it's not just about removing Trump from office. Rep. Bill Pascrell, D-N.J., said it's also a formal legal proceeding, which could strengthen Democrats' hand in securing testimony, documents and cooperation from the administration if they continue to stonewall congressional oversight.

"I think there are more people who look at impeachment not as a way to get the president, but as a process to begin to review what we know needs to be reviewed," Pascrell told NPR.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi, despite calling the situation a constitutional crisis, continues to urge a cautious approach. "Impeachment is one of the most divisive things that you do dividing a country unless you really have made your case with great clarity for the American people," she said.

Most Democrats are hesitant to publicly call for impeachment, but no one is ruling it out. "I think impeachment is always on the table, I always think that's a tool in the toolbox, but one of the one's that you use when you've run out of other options," she said.

Politically, Democrats have been wary that triggering impeachment proceedings might ultimately benefit Trump, who has long claimed to be the victim of a political "witch hunt."

Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., does not share that hesitation. "I understand the big picture is winning in 2020, and I don't really understand totally the calculus about not proceeding with impeachment," he said. "I think there's merit to putting the scarlet letter 'I' on his breast, because he deserves it."

Liberal activists agree. A group gathered outside the U.S. Capitol on Thursday to deliver 10 million petition signatures to pressure the House to start impeachment proceedings. Reps. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., and Al Green, D-Texas, have both authored impeachment resolutions and addressed the crowd.

"I say that we have a duty, a responsibility and an obligation under the Constitution of the United States of America to do our duty," Green said. "We must impeach. Let the Senate do what they may; we have to do what we must!"

The week took a toll on Democrats in many ways. Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., a member of the Judiciary Committee and vocal critic of the administration, had a broken blood vessel in his left eye by week's end. "They're not sure what caused it," he said, when asked if it was stress-induced. "It's just a tough time for everybody."

More:
House Democrats Inch Closer To Impeachment : NPR