Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

Labor Day is now a key to Election Day for Democrats and Republicans alike – NPR

Members of the International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union are seen on a Labor Day parade float, Sept. 4, 1961. While many may associate the holiday with major retail sales and end-of summer barbecues, Labor Day's roots are in worker-driven organizing. Hans Von Nolde/AP hide caption

Members of the International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union are seen on a Labor Day parade float, Sept. 4, 1961. While many may associate the holiday with major retail sales and end-of summer barbecues, Labor Day's roots are in worker-driven organizing.

"Labor Day" is one of those holiday names we repeat so often we stop thinking about what the words originally meant. Some people set aside time to remember the human price of war on Memorial Day. Most of us give some kind of thanks on Thanksgiving. But the only ritual for Labor Day is taking the day off, and many see it only as the three-day weekend that marks the end of summer.

Yet Labor Day is as political in its history as the Fourth of July or the birthday of Martin Luther King Jr. The first Labor Day celebration on the first Monday of September was in New York City in 1882, an era when labor activism was often illegal and always dangerous. Workers and police alike were killed when a labor protest near near Chicago's Haymarket Square turned violet in 1886, and federal troops fired on strikers in that city's Pullman Strike of 1894. Later that year, in a bid to calm a rising storm, Congress made Labor Day a legal holiday, and President Grover Cleveland signed it into law.

Over time, Labor Day became the American version of May Day or International Labor Day, an occasion to celebrate working people and their causes, often associated with the political left. For the major U.S. political parties, it also became the unofficial starting gate for fall election campaigns of the old-fashioned kind largely done outdoors in person with no screens of any kind.

For generations, Labor Day activities organized by unions were seen primarily as Democratic affairs. Working-class voters were the heart of the coalition Franklin Roosevelt rode to four presidential victories (1932-1944). FDR rewarded them with the National Labor Relations Act of 1935, enshrining in law the right to collective bargaining and giving labor unions a new level of recognition and clout.

President Franklin Roosevelt reads to his guests as he and first lady Eleanor Roosevelt, at table, host a Labor Day picnic at their residence in Hyde Park, N.Y., Sept. 3, 1934. AP hide caption

President Franklin Roosevelt reads to his guests as he and first lady Eleanor Roosevelt, at table, host a Labor Day picnic at their residence in Hyde Park, N.Y., Sept. 3, 1934.

But many of FDR voters or their descendants began drifting away from the Democrats in the economic expansion and relative affluence of the postwar era. The trend strengthened in the late 1960s as many grew disillusioned with the promises of President Lyndon Johnson's Vietnam War and his "Great Society" programs.

Many working-class voters turned to Richard Nixon, who built his "Silent Majority" around them in 1968 and 1972. Even more joined the ranks of "Reagan Democrats" carrying Ronald Reagan to a pair of landslide wins in the 1980s. And the demographic category provided the surprising surge that elected Donald Trump in 2016 (and came close to doing it again in 2020).

This is all part of the long postwar pattern by which the Democratic Party has departed from its traditional geographic and demographic bases. It is no longer surprising that elements of the Republican Party have eagerly embraced voters in those bases who felt the Democrats had simply abandoned them. Reagan was perhaps the most famous former Democrat who made a habit of saying: "I did not leave my party, my party left me."

The most obvious driver of this was the Democrats' move away from their historic roots as a Southern, rural party committed to states' rights. After a century of struggle among its factions, Democrats gradually followed the direction of a young speaker at the 1948 Democratic Convention. That was when Hubert Humphrey, later to be a senator and vice president and presidential nominee, called on the party to "get out of the shadow of states' and to walk forthrightly into the bright sunshine of human rights."

Sixteen years later, Humphrey, together with other Northern and Western Democrats and some Republicans, pieced together the two-thirds majority in the Senate to overcome a filibuster by Southern Democrats and pass the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The deep loyalty felt by many white Southerners for the party of Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson and also the party of the Lost Cause and the Stars and Bars of the Confederacy began to erode.

The trend was slowed by the election of two Southern Democratic presidents, Jimmy Carter of Georgia (1976) and Bill Clinton of Arkansas (1992). But even with Clinton in office in 1994, the full consequences of Dixie's defection to the GOP erupted in a single day. That November, Republicans won the majority of Southern governorships, Senate seats and congressional seats the first time that had happened since Reconstruction after the Civil War. Republican domination of Southern state legislatures was not far behind. And from the 1990s on, every Republican nominee for president has relied on Southern states for most of his Electoral College vote.

Local 361 iron worker Robert Farula marches up Fifth Avenue carrying an American flag during the Labor Day parade on Sept. 8, 2012, in New York. Mary Altaffer/AP hide caption

Local 361 iron worker Robert Farula marches up Fifth Avenue carrying an American flag during the Labor Day parade on Sept. 8, 2012, in New York.

That history has its parallel with regard to the votes and political loyalties of white workers who do not have college degrees. Call this voting demographic what you will, it has become the battleground in our presidential elections and in many down-ballot races as well.

That Democrats long ago lost their prior claim to this political territory is no longer surprising. Just as our political geography has changed, so have our partisan demographics. According to the source most political scientists use (the American National Election Studies Cumulative File), Republicans had an average advantage of 5 percentage points in party identification among college graduates in the 1980s. But a generation later, in the elections of 2016, 2018 and 2020, party identification among college graduates favored Democrats by an average of 14 points.

Still, with all the elements of shifting patterns in recent decades of American political life, the disconnect from the broad working class is the loss that has cost the Democrats most dearly and the one that threatens them most in the years ahead.

It has been some time since the Democrats could simply call themselves "the party of the working man." For one thing, women's share of the total workforce is now approaching 50%. For another, increasing numbers of working people do not regard the Democrats as their party. Donald Trump won the support of workers with less than a college degree in both 2016 and 2020 by 7 percentage points in 2016 and by 8 in 2020. Among those in the category who were white, Trump's margins were 36 points in 2016 and 32 four years later.

But gaudy as Trump's advantage was in the white subcategory, Biden got 5 percentage points more than Hillary Clinton had in 2016. And that improvement was critical in the swing states of Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin, the pivot on which the Electoral College turned.

That is just an illustration of how the wage-earning sector, variously defined, has become the principal battlefield in presidential elections and for many down ballot races as well. One measure of the category has always been "union households," meaning voters who report having at least one union member in their home. But as the membership in labor unions has fallen to the low teens in percentage terms,

For example, network exit polls found Biden winning 57% of union households, even as he lost the category of workers without college degrees to Trump.

It is hard to find an observer who thinks Biden could be reelected without doing at least as well among working people as he did in 2020. And he has shown keen awareness of this from the outset of his term with his open embrace of unions, support for their leadership, bargaining positions and legislative agenda. He regularly promotes his claim that 90% of the jobs created by his massive infrastructure bill (the misnamed Inflation Reduction Act) would not need a college degree.

Just this past week Biden's Labor secretary proposed a new rule by which 3.6 million more U.S. workers would be eligible for overtime pay. He has also restocked the National Labor Relations Board with appointees confirmed by the Senate, where a Republican majority had blocked three appointees of former President Obama. That board, the powerful arbiter of labor-management disputes, now has a Democratic majority.

At the same time, the GOP shows no sign of backing off its pursuit of the blue collar motherlode of winnable votes even if Trump is not the party's nominee a third time in 2024. The in-migration of former Democrats has, in fact, transformed the GOP and recast the competitions we know as campaigns.

A Gallup Poll in late August showed public approval of labor unions as an institution at 67%, with even support among Republicans at 52%. Other recent surveys have shown public support for unions as high as it has ever been since polling began in the 1930s. And that reflects a renewed courtship by both parties.

Much of the contemporary GOP has long since shed its air of country club superiority. Some Republican events have taken on the populist tone of Trump's raucous rallies, which have been media magnets of great power in the last two election cycles.

When the Republican National Committee held its first presidential debate of the 2024 campaign in August, the broadcast began with a video of country singer Oliver Anthony, whanging a banjo and singing his Billboard No. 1 hit "Rich Men North of Richmond" a blast at America's elite on behalf of its working poor. Immediately thereafter, the first question of the night from the Fox News moderator was: "Why is this song striking such a nerve in this country right now?"

The candidates that night all seemed to know the song was a hit because it targeted Democrats such as President Biden. But the singer-songwriter posted a video of his own two days later with a very different take, saying "that song was written about the people on that stage." He said his real target was "the haves" who want "the have nots" to feel helpless. Populist, yes, to be sure. But was it Republican?

It might be said that, at 80, Biden has survived long enough to be the man of the hour. He won his first race for the Senate more than half a century ago with 50.5% of the vote and the backing of the Delaware AFL-CIO. He won the nomination for president he had sought three times when labor unions swung his way in 2020. Labor leaders and other traditional party people woke up after Super Tuesday to Biden as the de facto nominee and felt relatively comfortable with him. Not so much passion perhaps, but what the Democrats needed to defeat Trump that year.

The question going forward is whether there remains enough faith in the 80-year-old version of Biden physically and enough confidence in Biden as a candidate to beat back another assault from Trump. Or, alternatively, enough freshness and energy in him to match up against a fresh Republican face, if Trump is not the GOP nominee.

Go here to see the original:
Labor Day is now a key to Election Day for Democrats and Republicans alike - NPR

Maine, Niles Township Democrats Holding Campaign, Petition … – Journal & Topics Newspapers Online

Candidates may begin circulating nominating petitions for the Tuesday, March 19, 2024 Primary Election on Tuesday, Sept. 5.

State Sen. Laura Murphy (D-28th), who serves as Maine Township Democratic committeeperson, will host a petition and campaign kickoff at 12:30 p.m. Saturday, Sept. 9 at Kappys American Grill, 7200 W. Dempster St., Morton Grove. The restaurant is owned by Niles Mayor George Alpogianis.

Murphy is expected to be joined at the kickoff by candidates running in Maine Township including U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-9th), State Reps. Marty Moylan (D-55th) and Michelle Mussman (*D-56th) along with judicial candidates and others.

Niles Township Democrats United will hold a petition launch event at 12:30 p.m. Sunday, Sept. 10 at Laramie Park in Skokie off Touhy Avenue, hosted by Niles Township Democratic Committeeperson Josina Morita, and Skokie School Dist. 73.5 board member Bushra Amiwala. Schakowsky is also expected to attend.

The 2024 election will include the race for president. Although the Republican field is packed, only three Democrats have announced their runs: President Joe Biden, Robert Kennedy, Jr., and Marianne Williamson. Kennedy and Williamson are seen as longshots to secure the Democratic nomination.

Murphy said the Biden campaign is expected to work with local congressional representatives to name delegates to the Democratic National Convention for Biden in October. Murphy said she hopes to see Park Ridge resident Aurora Austriaco on the ballot as a Biden delegate. Austriaco is an attorney and former member of the Maine High School Dist. 207 Board of Education.

The Cook County Democratic Party has released its list of endorsed candidates, including Biden for president along with Clayton Harris for Cook County states attorney (Kim Foxx is not seeking reelection), and Mariyana Spyropoulos for clerk of the Circuit Court of Cook County, along with numerous supreme, appellate and circuit court judge candidates.

Read the rest here:
Maine, Niles Township Democrats Holding Campaign, Petition ... - Journal & Topics Newspapers Online

Democrats to host harvest dinner in Jefferson Oct. 1 – Kennebec Journal and Morning Sentinel

The Lincoln County Democratic Committee plans to host its annual harvest dinner from 4-6 p.m. Sunday, Oct. 1, at Jeffersons Le Barn event center, the restored gambrel-roofed barn at 132 Waldoboro Road.

The event includes a menu of locally sourced stews and soups, and local elected officials will deliver updates on legislative initiatives.

The simple bill of fare will include a selection of soups and stews with vegan options prepared by volunteer chefs, bread, butter, locally pressed apple cider, and a selection of pies accompanied by coffee in an informal, all-you-care-to-eat, family style format.

The committee uses the money it raises through this and other fundraising initiatives to support its local efforts in Lincoln County.

There is a limited seating of 120. Reservations are available for $25 per person for the meal, with a $50 option to be listed as a host. Hosts offer additional support and are recognized at the event for their generosity.

The committee welcomes nonmembers, out-of-county visitors, or others who want to support the organization to attend. For event details, sponsorship information, and the link to make reservations before Sunday, Sept. 24, visit lincolncountydemocrats.com. Contact event organizer Valarie Johnson at 207-549-3358 with questions.

Previous

See more here:
Democrats to host harvest dinner in Jefferson Oct. 1 - Kennebec Journal and Morning Sentinel

As Republicans Thirst for War With Mexico, Democrats Push for Vote … – The Intercept

As invading Mexico becomes a mainstream Republican Party position, a group of Democratic lawmakers introduced a measure on Thursday that would bar a U.S. president from unilaterally taking military action against the country.

The response to the war powers resolution from the office of Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla. who has led recent efforts to reduce the U.S. militarys foreign entanglements highlights populist Republicans growing pains in their emerging anti-war coalition with progressive Democrats.

At first, Gaetzs office told The Intercept that he would oppose the amendment. In a follow-up statement attributed to the lawmaker, a spokesperson wrote: Mexico is a captive narco state. I support the amendment and support passing an Authorized Use of Military Force against Mexico.

The measure was introduced by Democratic Reps. Jess Chuy Garca of Illinois; Joaquin Castro of Texas; and Nydia Velzquez of New York as an amendment to the 2024 Department of Defense appropriations bill.

The amendment draws on the War Powers Resolution of 1973, which was established to limit the presidents authority to wage war. It would bar the use of the military budget with respect to Mexico without congressional authorization, including for the introduction of United States Armed Forces into hostilities in Mexico, into situations in Mexico where imminent involvement in hostilities is clearly indicated by the circumstances, or into Mexican territory, airspace, or waters while equipped for combat.

Garca told The Intercept that the amendment was spurred in part by the escalating chorus of Republican calls to invade Mexico.

Armed interventions and the humanitarian crises they inevitably engender are central reasons why people leave their home countries in the first place, Garca said. Invading Mexico would endanger a key partner, increase the chaos in which cartels thrive, and force large numbers of people to come to our border fleeing violence far from addressing the challenges that Republicans purport to care about.

Donald Trump has led the calls for war, enlisting advisers to come up with ways to attack Mexican drug cartels with or without Mexicos permission. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis promised he would send military forces to Mexico on day one if he is elected president. Vivek Ramaswamy, the businessman-turned-presidential-hopeful, said he would use military force to decimate the cartels, Osama bin Laden-style, Soleimani-style in the first six months of his presidency. Former CIA agent Will Hurd who at one point was the only Black Republican in the House said this week that he wants to dismantle cartel and human smuggling networks by treating them the same way we treated the Taliban and Al Qaeda.

Meanwhile in Congress, 21 Republicans led by Reps. Dan Crenshaw and Michael Waltz introduced legislation in January to authorize the use of military force against Mexican cartels. In March, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., announced he would introduce legislation to set the stage for military force in Mexico. And House Oversight Committee Chair James Comer said it was a mistake that then-President Trump didnt move forward with his reported hopes to shoot missiles into Mexico to destroy the drug labs, and then lie and pretend the U.S. was not behind the attack.

Velzquez said in a statement that military operations in Mexico would be an unmitigated disaster. Before the idea goes any further, she added, we need levelheaded policymakers to speak up and clarify that Congress will not support this. This amendment will ensure that no funding is allocated to these extreme policies.

Over the last several years, congressional progressives have brought forward a number of war powers resolutions to force lawmakers to contend with U.S. entanglements abroad. In 2019, Congress passed a bipartisan resolution to stop U.S. support for the Saudi-led war in Yemen, only for Trump to veto it. (Last year, Sen. Bernie Sanders unsuccessfully tried to revive the effort.)

Earlier this year, Gaetz introduced two separate war powers resolutions, both of which garnered significant GOP support but ultimately failed. Fifty-two Republicans voted in favor of his resolution directing the president to remove all forces from Somalia, and 47 did the same with regard to Syria. The concern with the haphazard use of military force, however, may not extend to Mexico.

The Intercept contacted 18 House Republicans who have previously supported war powers resolutions. Most did not respond to questions whether Congress would need to authorize war with Mexico.

Many Trump-aligned Republicans have rightly been adamant that only Congress can authorize war and military action. Dozens of them have voted to withdraw U.S. troops from unauthorized wars in Syria, Somalia, and Yemen, said Erik Sperling, executive director of the advocacy organization Just Foreign Policy. It would be a scandal if those who want a war in Mexico would now allow a future President to violate the Constitution and wage unauthorized war. They should support this important Garcia-Castro amendment and make clear that any future president will have to come to Congress before taking us to war in Mexico or anywhere else.

Arizona Rep. Paul Gosar was among the only members to respond to The Intercepts inquiry. Instead of addressing the necessity of congressional authorization for use of military force in Mexico, he attacked the Biden administration. Joe Biden and the incompetent Secretary Mayorkas are complicit in their failure to protect Americans from the invasion along the southern border. Ive repeatedly said that we must defend our border by any and all legal means necessary, including deploying our military, said Gosar, who voted in favor of the war powers resolutions for Somalia and Syria. Every member of congress should vote and be on record of supporting efforts to secure our border or continue to support this invasion.

Crenshaws office pointed to his bill from January about authorizing force against Mexican cartels and did not respond to a question about the Democrats amendment.

Tennessee Rep. Tim Burchetts office did not speak to his stance on the amendment. Since it would currently require Congressional authorization, Congressman Burchett would not support changing the status quo to give the current president more unilateral decision-making authority in this area.

New York Rep. George Santos was more cautious than his Republican colleagues. Of course we want congressional authorization for any military action, said Santos, who also voted in favor of the war powers resolutions for Somalia and Syria. However militarization of the immigration crisis should be an absolute last resort.

Congress is set to debate the appropriations bill when lawmakers return to Washington in September.

Read the original:
As Republicans Thirst for War With Mexico, Democrats Push for Vote ... - The Intercept

If Joe Biden Falters, Democrats Have Prepped the Bench – Vanity Fair

Inside the Hive host Brian Stelter takes the pulse of the Democratic Party with Vanity Fair contributing editors Chris Smith and Jennifer Palmieri. I think we have a great bench, says Palmieri, who served as communications director for Hillary Clintons 2016 campaign and the Obama White House, and is currently a cohost on Showtimes The Circus. While President Joe Bidens going to be the nominee for the Democrats in 2024, she says, the party has a bench of possible presidential candidates that are in waiting for 2028.

I have a theory that the Trump years made Democrats great, she continues. Just really good candidates, because there was so much on the line. I think both the caliber, quality of candidates, the issues that governors had to deal withso existential. I think that it just produced a whole generation of talent that might not have coalesced if there had not been so much on the line.

Still, they discuss possible scenarios if the 80-year-old Biden were to exit the race before Election Dayfrom a governor like J.B. Pritzker, Gretchen Whitmer, or Gavin Newsom getting in the ring, to Vice President Kamala Harris moving to the top of the ticket. Theres no development in the presidents health thats making [Bidens people] more worried than not, says Smith. But theyre realists and, you know, they know the actuarial facts as well as the rest of us. So they are very much keeping their fingers crossed and wondering how this is going to play out.

Read more:
If Joe Biden Falters, Democrats Have Prepped the Bench - Vanity Fair