Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

The Atlantic Politics & Policy Daily: Senate Democrats Stay Up Late on a School Night – The Atlantic

Today in 5 Lines

During an address at MacDill Air Force Base, President Trump accused the press of not reporting on terrorist attacks. Earlier in the day, Trump tweeted that polls showing his executive order on immigration to be unpopular are fake news. A group of national security and intelligence officials, including former Secretaries of State John Kerry and Madeleine Albright, signed a letter saying Trumps executive order would endanger U.S. troops. And 97 companies, including Apple and Google, filed a legal brief condemning the ban. Senate Democrats plan to express their opposition to the confirmation of Betsy DeVos, the education secretary nominee, ahead of Tuesdays Senate vote. John Bercow, the speaker of Britains House of Commons, said he would be strongly opposed to Trump addressing Parliament during his official visit to the U.K.

Forgive and Forget?: Now that Donald Trump is the president of the United States, a small cadre of high-profile conservativesthe haters, the losers, the Never-Trumpers who never fell in linehas found itself wondering whether their partys president will use his new powers to settle old scores. (McKay Coppins)

How to Beat Trump: Donald Trump presents a unique challenge to those looking to organize against him. David Frum lists three ways for the left to mobilize effectively.

An Unexpected Choice: If prominent neoconservative Elliott Abrams is selected and confirmed as deputy secretary of state, he will occupy a peculiar position in an administration that has promised to repudiate nearly everything that neoconservatism stood for, and which has disdained foreign-policy professionals as bumbling fools. (David A. Graham)

Follow stories throughout the day with our Politics & Policy portal.

Deja Vu: Kellyanne Conway, a top adviser to Donald Trump, walked back her comments about the non-existent Bowling Green Massacre on Friday, saying she made an honest mistake. But she referenced the same fictitious event in an earlier interview with Cosmopolitan.com. (Kristen Mascia)

Strategy Stumbles: Interviews with administration officials reveal that the president is increasingly frustrated with the backlash to his recent executive actionsand is rethinking an improvisational approach to governing that mirrors his chaotic presidential campaign. (Glenn Thrush and Maggie Haberman, The New York Times)

Whats Wrong With Nationalism?: The concept has a bad reputation across the globe, but nationalism can be a force for good, write Rich Lowry and Ramesh Ponnuru: A benign nationalism involves loyalty to ones country: a sense of belonging, allegiance, and gratitude to it. (National Review)

Tipping the Scales: For the first time in the Affordable Care Acts history, more people favor the law than oppose it. Danielle Kurtzleben explains why the theory of relative deprivation, or being deprived of something a person feels they are entitled to, could explain the reversal of public opinion. (NPR)

A New Home: Nebraska has accepted more refugees per capita than any other state, but it also happens to be a deeply conservative one. Robert Samuels captures how this dynamic has affected some Syrian refugees who have settled in the state. (The Washington Post)

Taking Control: The Republican Party currently controls the House, Senate, and White House for the first time since 2007. These graphics show which party held a majority under past administrations and what the majority managed to accomplish. (Chris Canipe, The Wall Street Journal)

Actress Melissa McCarthy caused a stir this weekend with her impersonation of White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer on Saturday Night Live. What are some of your favorite political impressions in comedyand why?

Send your answers to hello@theatlantic.com, and our favorites will be featured in Fridays Politics & Policy Daily.

-Written by Elaine Godfrey (@elainejgodfrey) and Candice Norwood (@cjnorwoodwrites)

View post:
The Atlantic Politics & Policy Daily: Senate Democrats Stay Up Late on a School Night - The Atlantic

Steve Bannon in 2010: Democrats have a ‘plantation mentality’ towards African-Americans – CNN

Bannon, the former Breitbart executive who has now emerged as one the most influential advisers inside Trump's White House, described a "victimology" among African Americans created by the welfare state, which caused them to attack black conservatives.

After listing off several prominent black conservatives, Bannon said, "These people are heroes. They take an incredible, incredible amount of grief because the welfare state has built in this victimology. And the elitist, liberal, progressives have a plantation mentality that they don't think African Americans should be out of government control."

A spokesperson for the Trump administration did not return a request for comment.

Bannon added in the webinar that Tea Party activists have to support black conservatives.

"The Democratic progressive party cannot rule if they don't get 90% of the black vote. If we cut into the black vote, if we make it 80/20, we can win a hundred congressional seats this time," Bannon said.

Earlier in the program, Bannon said conservative women and minorities are attacked by liberals because they pose a threat to their narrative about conservatives.

"If you think the women are vilified, if you think Sarah Palin, and Michele Bachmann, and Michelle Malkin, all of these great women in the tea party movement are absolutely vilified because they are an existential threat to progressive narrative, you haven't seen anything by how they viciously attack our black and African American conservatives," he said.

Read more:
Steve Bannon in 2010: Democrats have a 'plantation mentality' towards African-Americans - CNN

Democrats seize on Trump’s judge slam – Politico

House Judiciary Committee ranking Democrat John Conyers is among those included in the draft letter. | Getty

House Democrats are preparing to put a squeeze on Republicans for their silence in the face of President Donald Trump's attack on a federal judge.

A draft resolution being circulated by three Democratic members of the House Judiciary Committee including ranking Democrat John Conyers sharply criticizes Trump for his weekend swipes at the Seattle-based district court judge, James Robart, who halted the president's travel ban on seven Muslim-majority countries.

Story Continued Below

"Whether or not one agrees with the substance of a particular judicial decision, it is inappropriate for sitting presidents, or other government officials, to engage in ad hominem attacks against a judge, or otherwise place political pressure designed to undermine the independence of that judge, or to erode trust in the entire court system," according to the resolution.

The non-binding, politically charged measure, spearheaded by Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.), will likely go nowhere in the GOP-controlled House. But it's a tool in the limited Democratic arsenal meant to embarrass Republicans and highlight their uncomfortable relationship with Trump early in his presidency.

The draft resolution quotes from a slew of Trump's weekend tweets aimed at Robart, highlighting Trump's characterization of the George W. Bush-appointed jurist as a "so-called judge."

The measure also slaps at Trump for his campaign-season attack on Gonzalo Curiel, the judge who presided over a lawsuit against Trump University. It concludes with a statement of support for the notion that the legislative, executive and judicial branches of government are co-equal and "each deserves the respect of the others."

Republicans have largely refrained from directly criticizing Trump over his weekend comments about Robart, though several issued harsh rebukes of Trump during the campaign when he slammed Curiel. A few GOP lawmakers, though, chided Trump for getting personal with Robart.

"It is best not to single out judges," said Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell Sunday on CNN's "State of the Union."

And on ABC's "This Week," Sen. Ben Sasse (R-Neb.), a frequent Trump critic, said: "We dont have so-called judges."

Read this article:
Democrats seize on Trump's judge slam - Politico

For Democrats in Carson City, control only an illusion – Las Vegas Review-Journal

The 2017 legislative session begins today, and Democrats have only the illusion of control.

In last years elections, Democrats won majorities in both the Senate, 12-9, and Assembly, 27-15. Leftists expect those majorities to push through liberal policy priorities: rolling back Republican-passed labor and education reforms, raising property taxes and increasing the minimum wage.

Fortunately, Democrats cant achieve these goals without Republican support. Democrats need the signature of Republican Gov. Brian Sandoval on their bills, or they need Republican votes in the Assembly and Senate to get the two-thirds majority needed to override any Sandoval veto.

Republicans have leverage, and theyve already boxed in Democrats on two significant issues: Education Savings Accounts and property tax increases. Senate Minority Leader Michael Roberson, R-Henderson, has declared, No ESA funding no budget. Sandoval has put $60 million into his budget to partially fund ESAs.

Robersons statement means nothing if Sandoval isnt willing to veto the budget over ESAs. Roberson was Sandovals strongest ally in 2015. Read between the lines: Sandoval is going to play hardball for ESAs.

Its already working. Assembly Speaker Jason Frierson, D-Las Vegas, has signaled hes willing to negotiate on ESA funding. As I wrote last month, Sandoval will determine whether ESAs are funded or not.

The Senate Republican caucus also has declared that its members will not support a property tax increase, which matters because tax increase bills require two-thirds majorities in both houses. This puts Senate Majority Leader Aaron Ford, who wants to be governor and may run in 2018, in a pickle.

Local government unions, powerful players in any Democratic primary, want a property tax increase. Ford, D-Las Vegas, doesnt have the votes. Even if he did, Nevadans, especially older citizens who vote in midterm elections, hate property tax increases.

Further complicating matters for Ford: Clark County Commission Chairman Steve Sisolak, who already has $3 million for his all-but-announced campaign for governor, can have it both ways. Sisolak, also a Democrat, has called for a legislative fix that increases the property tax cap which pleases union bosses but hasnt come out in support of a specific legislative proposal. This would allow a Sisolak-supporting super-PAC to bash Ford in a gubernatorial primary for wanting to raise property taxes, while Sisolak can simultaneously tell unions he supported legislative action.

Expect Ford to be vocal about wanting to increase property tax caps while letting others try to advance it behind the scenes.

This pattern is going to play out for other major Democrat priorities, like another $1 billion-plus tax increase for new K-12 funding. If Democrats dont announce a major tax increase proposal this week, theyre not serious about making it happen. Democrats have a history of proposing tax increases so late in a session that the proposals have no prayer of passage. Theyre announced solely to convince the partys liberal base that lawmakers tried really hard.

Sandoval is supportive of some liberal priorities. For instance, hed probably sign a small minimum wage increase paired with overtime reform, but one thats far from $15 an hour.

This reality will define the session. Democrats are in charge, but they arent in control.

Victor Joecks column appears in the Nevada section each Monday, Wednesday and Friday. Contact him at vjoecks@reviewjournal.com. Follow @victorjoecks on Twitter.

See the original post:
For Democrats in Carson City, control only an illusion - Las Vegas Review-Journal

Trump sets Democratic field ablaze with anger – Politico

The Democratic base is so roiled and enraged after only two weeks of Donald Trumps presidency that a take-no-prisoners posture toward the White House is emerging as the price of entry for the 2020 primary.

An election that could have focused in on economic inequality and the excesses of Wall Street the issues that animate the lefts leading tribunes, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren is already shaping up as a contest about the intensity of the resistance to Trump.

Story Continued Below

In almost 20 years of doing this, Ive never felt like were in a moment like we are now, said Anne Caprara, a senior advisor for the Priorities USA Action super PAC and a veteran Democratic campaign operative. This is the moment in history. People will look back and ask what you did, and theres a real palpable recognition of that among elected officials."

The urgency of the moment is not lost on the partys leading 2020 hopefuls. Many of them including Warren and fellow Senators Cory Booker, Kirsten Gillibrand, and Kamala Harris abandoned their schedules last weekend to appear at protests in their home states or in Washington, grasping the imperative to be both public and distinctive in their opposition to Trumps executive order on refugee travel. Then Warren, Sanders, Gillibrand, and Booker voted against approving Elaine Chao for Secretary of Transportation, one of Trumps least controversial picks and an unmistakable thumb in the eye of Chaos husband, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell.

People will say, Where were you when he appointed Jeff Sessions? Where were you when he picked a Supreme Court justice? That will be a real question in primaries, and I wouldnt want to the the candidate on the wrong side of that, said longtime strategist Bob Shrum, warning of the importance of public resistance in a week where Democratic senators began boycotting votes on Trump picks altogether.

Leading Democratic strategists warn that the first signs will appear in midterm elections, where the primary electorate will demand more than just marching outside the White House or grabbing a bullhorn at an arrivals lounge. Theyll be expecting something close to 100 percent rejection of Trumps agenda making the coming years complicated for members of Congress, who have to vote on it, rather than the governors and mayors who get to assume more offensive posture.

Base voters are likely to want their pols to press on specific issues against Trump, not just on his generally objectionable behavior, say operatives considering how to counsel ambitious lawmakers. If each candidate is anti-Trump, the thinking goes, the best way to distinguish one's self is to distill an original anti-Trump message focused on a concrete policy point.

I dont really have any doubt that, setting party or ideology aside, all of us as Americans are going to be talking to our kids and grandkids about this time in American history and what we were doing, said former Missouri Secretary of State Jason Kander, who narrowly lost that state's U.S. Senate race in 2016. And that means we all have to maximize the platform that we have.

Democratic pols at every level have instinctively reacted to the idea that party voters are demanding a response commensurate with the scale of the perceived threat. After many of them caught grief for missing the womens marches to appear at a donor conference the previous weekend, for example, three of the candidates for Democratic National Committee chairman rushed to George Bush Intercontinental airport in Houston to protest publicly following their candidate forum last Saturday.

Sen. Kamala Harris, D-Calif., speaks during the Women's March on Washington on Jan. 21. | AP Photo

It's not just traditional progressive leaders who are leading the charge to respond to the base. Among the most prominent faces of the anti-Trump airport protests were a pair of moderate governors who have previously clashed with liberals, but who nevertheless manned the front lines in the wake of Trumps immigration order. Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe rushed to Dulles International Airport, while New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo ordered a reopening of public transit to John F. Kennedy International Airport so more of his constituents could demonstrate.

In Virginia, the site of one of the Trump eras first primaries in 2017, the presidents presence is already inescapable in the governors race.

Ive always tried to respond and speak up for the values and principles that I believe in, and Ill continue to do that, said Lt. Gov. Ralph Northam, a candidate for the seat. Its just that hes put them front and center in the first few days hes been president, so hes stirred up a hornets nest.

Sadly, I think Donald Trumps actions leave us in a place where the question is no longer how to engage with the Trump administration, but how do we engage Republicans in Congress to oppose these actions that are a threat?, added former Congressman Tom Perriello, Northams primary opponent, who appeared at Dulles last weekend. Theres an awareness that this is not some latest turnover of partisan power. This is a much deeper threat to our democratic institutions. I think the question is whether some of the Republican electeds who feel the tingle in their spine if they can find their spines can form a bipartisan resistance."

Gone are the concerns about appearing overly obstructionist an accusation frequently tossed at McConnell during Barack Obamas presidency. Officeholders are now chasing a base that will not tolerate any sign of accommodation.

Everyone is getting to the same point, said Democratic pollster Margie Omero. This is not like after George W. Bush won, where people had different kinds of strategies."

Sen. Cory Booker, center, speaks with other members of Congress as demonstrators protest against President Donald Trump's travel ban during a rally outside the US Supreme Court on Jan. 30. | Getty

Protesters gathered outside Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumers Brooklyn apartment last week to demand he take a harder line on Trump, in a demonstration marketed as, What the f*ck, Chuck?!"

Warren, the progressive icon, was forced to defend her vote to approve Ben Carsons nomination for Housing and Urban Development secretary, taking to Facebook to explain a move that had party members accusing her of "selling us out" at the DNC meeting in Houston last weekend. Still facing heat, Warren expanded on her apology in a speech to the Congressional Progressive Caucus in Baltimore on Saturday.

"Like a lot of you, I'm still finding my way, finding my footing, day by day, step by step," she said. "We make mistakes. But with each passing day, we learn.

Liberal Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse got an even rougher ride: he was shouted down by protesters yelling Obstruct! last week in Providence after he voted for Trumps CIA Director pick, former congressman Mike Pompeo. The point was made: Asked on MSNBC several days later if he would support Secretary of State-nominee Rex Tillerson, Whitehouse was unequivocal: I checked with the parliamentarian, and they dont allow hell no, so Ill be voting 'no.'"

Whether the leaders of the Democratic Party will catch up to their base remains to be seen, said Mark Longabaugh, a longtime campaign operative and a senior strategist for Sanders' 2016 presidential bid.

Some of the partys larger outside groups are fueling the drive to push officials toward loud, hard-line resistance. MoveOn.org last Monday published an open letter instructing senators that Showing up at protests must be just the beginning. Were doing our job. Senate Democrats must do theirs by using every procedural tool available to stop Trump."

Sen. Elizabeth Warren speaks to a crown gathered at Logan Airport in Boston on Jan. 28. | AP Photo

Our Revolution, the group built out of the Sanders campaign, is pushing backers to demand that their senators use the full 30 hours of debate on each Trump nominee, effectively grinding the Senate to a procedural halt. Even Priorities, which supported Hillary Clinton in 2016 and became the partys largest super PAC ever, has stepped up the pressure on lawmakers now that Trump has picked Judge Neil Gorsuch for the Supreme Court: the group is mobilizing its supporters to urge their senators to force a 60-vote threshold for him.

To professional Democrats whove been working for candidates for decades, the current wave of activity is beginning to look more like a broad-based movement.

This is a grassroots reaction at a level of intensity that I havent seen in the Democratic Party since Vietnam, said Shrum. It even exceeds the reaction to Iraq, which was more a slow simmer than this kind of explosive reaction."

Added former New Mexico governor and onetime presidential hopeful Bill Richardson, Anyone who is hoping for a reconciliation or bipartisanship is smoking weed right now."

Read the rest here:
Trump sets Democratic field ablaze with anger - Politico