Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

Rauner and Democrats clash over State of the State – Chicago Tribune

Against the backdrop of a sharply divided and dysfunctional state government, Republican Gov. Bruce Rauner delivered his midterm State of the State address Wednesday saying he and other politicians have a "moral obligation" to fix Illinois.

But some Democrats, the majority party in the General Assembly that has opposed much of his agenda, questioned Rauner's morality in governing a state that has languished for more than 18 months without a full budget. In the meantime, safety net social programs have eroded at a time when gun violence in Chicago is rampant.

The governor addressed the city's violence in his speech a day after the issue was thrust further into the spotlight by a tweet from President Donald Trump. It warned if the city didn't get a handle on the problem, he would "send in the Feds!"

"The violence occurring in Chicago every night is intolerable. We cannot let it continue. We've got to bring it to an end," Rauner said.

He found his address ostensibly as a precursor to his campaign for re-election next year clouded by his fight with Democrats over spending plans.

Despite the lack of a high-profile, political bumper sticker-style signature achievement while budget progress remains stymied, Rauner sought to portray an optimistic tone for the state's future.

He touted moves that included increased ethics restrictions and more computerization in state government, as well as fewer punitive actions toward nonviolent offenders and programs to reduce children's exposure to lead. He even noted savings on paper and postage costs by digitizing applications and renewals for professional licensing.

"Despite the problems and uncertainties we face, I am deeply optimistic about the future of our beloved Illinois. We have big challenges, and like many of you, I'm frustrated by the slow pace of change in Springfield. But with great challenge comes great opportunity," Rauner said.

"All of us Republicans, Democrats and everyone in between have a moral obligation to work together to bring change. We, together, can return Illinois to a place of hope, opportunity and prosperity," he said.

Democrats, however, didn't share Rauner's optimism.

State Rep. Lou Lang of Skokie, a top deputy to Rauner political nemesis House Speaker Michael Madigan, said the governor "didn't say much" in his speech and "crowed about accomplishments that weren't his." Lang contended Democrats led the fight for more state funding for schools and changes in the criminal justice system.

Throughout his governorship, Rauner has pushed for pro-business, union-weakening changes in state laws as a condition for approving higher taxes likely needed to balance the state budget. Madigan and Democrats who control the legislature and are backed by unions and civil attorneys have opposed Rauner's agenda.

Madigan contended Rauner was pursuing an agenda that would reward "big corporations" at the expense of middle-class families. Madigan vowed a "thorough vetting process" of proposals to create jobs and boost wages, though he offered no specifics about that process.

Rauner, as he has often done in the past, called on lawmakers to send to voters proposed state constitutional amendments to limit politicians' terms and move to take much of the politics out of drawing legislative boundaries. Democratic lawmakers have rebuffed his calls.

And he said the state had made progress on three goals he set for his administration: improving ethics and efficiency, investing in education and making Illinois more competitive.

In speaking of Chicago's violence, Rauner made no mention of Trump. But he said in an interview earlier in the day on WGN 720-AM that he had not spoken to the president about the issue. The governor, however, said he had ruled out mobilizing the Illinois National Guard.

In his speech, the governor said he and the Illinois State Police "stand ready to do more" to assist the Chicago Police Department. State police patrol city expressways, which also have seen a surge in gun-related activity.

Rauner said there was "no single solution" to Chicago's gun violence and said a mix of policies "with a joint commitment between the city, the county, the state and the federal government" was required.

"Law enforcement plays a critical role in violence reduction but in the end, it's a treatment, not a cure," he said.

"Addressing the roots of this plague will take much more: to restore hope where hope has been lost, to build a long-term future of quality education and good jobs for communities that need it most. Tearing down the barriers to good jobs and economic opportunity. Getting rid of blight and incentivizing redevelopment. Making sure both the state and Chicago Public Schools treat low-income kids the same as high-income kids. Giving parents more choices and support to give their kids a world-class education. Putting vocational training back into our high schools so young people can see a clear path to a career rather than falling victim to the gang recruiters," he said.

Democrats countered that it was Rauner's refusal to negotiate a budget separate from his political agenda that's led to widespread cuts in child care, higher education and human service programs that has helped feed the city's violence.

"I thought overall it was just an incredibly tone-deaf speech. It's tough to hear the governor cry crocodile tears when I would argue he has blood on his hands with all the anti-violence programs he's cut since he was here," said Rep. Christian Mitchell, D-Chicago.

"Cuts to mental health, cuts to Medicaid, look at the savage cuts to higher education, which leads to more kids at home without the prospect of a job or future, then maybe turning to drugs and crime," he said.

But House Republican leader Jim Durkin of Western Springs, a former assistant Cook County prosecutor, said the city needs to have "a greater, strong law enforcement presence in certain areas, strategic areas."

"There's been a lot of piling on police officers throughout the state of Illinois and the city of Chicago. We need to stop. They need the ability to do their work," Durkin said.

Rauner's speech came as an effort by Democratic Senate President John Cullerton and Senate Republican leader Christine Radogno to ambitiously advance a blueprint for ending the state's budget stalemate stalled the day before.

The complex package, including tax increases and a two-year property tax freeze, as well as workers' compensation changes aimed at helping businesses and a new plan to alter state worker pensions, met with heavy opposition from an alliance of business and unions.

Republican Sen. Bill Brady of Bloomington, a top assistant to Radogno, said GOP senators don't believe a two-year property-tax freeze is enough to offset other tax hikes and want business groups to support the package they've opposed so far.

The governor went off his prepared script to encourage senators to continue working.

"Thank you for working so hard to try to come together on a bipartisan basis to find a compromise to get a truly balanced budget with changes to the system to help job creators and protect taxpayers," he said.

"We all know this is very, very difficult. There's a lot of arrows. Please don't give up. Please keep working. Please keep trying. The people of Illinois need you to succeed. Thank you," Rauner said.

Chicago Tribune's Haley BeMiller contributed.

rap@aol.com

mcgarcia@chicagotribune.com

Visit link:
Rauner and Democrats clash over State of the State - Chicago Tribune

How The Democratic Party Can Get Back Into The Game – Forbes


Forbes
How The Democratic Party Can Get Back Into The Game
Forbes
Democrats have ceded the term party of the people to the Republicans (or at least to nobody at all). The Democrats are indeed seen as Eastern or Western establishment, coastal, metropolitan, and campus-based. While the party has a substantial ...

and more »

Continued here:
How The Democratic Party Can Get Back Into The Game - Forbes

Democrats hold lessons on how to talk to real people – Politico

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) will prep Democrats on how to engage against Republicans over Trump's Supreme Court pick. | Getty

Senate Democrats geared up for battle with President Donald Trump by preparing to talk to people who voted for him and by hearing from one of his arch-nemeses.

Gathering in Sheperdstown, W.Va., Democrats were scheduled to hear from liberal political operative David Brock on Thursday, who ran a session called Hold Trump Accountable with Center for American Progress CEO Neera Tanden and Priorities USA CEO Guy Cecil. Earlier in the day, Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) moderated a discussion with Trump voters," according to a draft schedule obtained by POLITICO.

Story Continued Below

Manchin and nine other Senate Democrats are up for reelection next year in states that Trump won. Much of the event appears geared at figuring out how to turn people who supported Trump into Democratic voters in 2018.

Former Kentucky Gov. Steve Beshear (D), along with Sens. Heidi Heitkamp (D-N.D.) and Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), held a session on speaking to those who feel invisible in rural America," according to the schedule. Other sessions were along similar lines: Listening to those feel unheard and Rising America They feel unheard too.

On Thursday Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) will discuss political tactics for the midterm election and Democrats will strategize on how to define themselves and Trump. Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Tim Kaine (D-Va.) and Joe Donnelly (D-Ind.) will talk about Triangulating Trump, emphasizing that they can go around Republicans by trying to work with Trump on infrastructure, outsourcing and trade.

Finally, Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) will prep Democrats on how to engage against Republicans over Trump's Supreme Court pick, which is expected to come as soon as next week.

On Wednesday evening, Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii) led a wine and cheese reception, then got a history show about Harpers Ferry called September Suspense: Lincolns Union in Peril.

Democrats did not allow reporters to attend.

See the original post here:
Democrats hold lessons on how to talk to real people - Politico

Democrats warn Trump’s voter fraud investigation will increase voter suppression – Politico

House Democrats on Wednesday panned President Donald Trumps pledge to pursue a major investigation into alleged voter fraud, describing the presidents demand as insecure and saying the probe will only increase voter suppression.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said she "felt sorry" for Trump and even prayed for him after learning of his calls for an investigation.

Story Continued Below

For a person who is newly elected president of the United States to be so insecure ... to suggest and to undermine the integrity of our voting system, is really strange, she told reporters Wednesday during a news conference in the Capitol.

I frankly feel very sad about the president making this claim, she added. I felt sorry for him. I even prayed for him.

Trump took to Twitter on Wednesday morning to call for an investigation into voter fraud and irregularities in the voting rolls two days after he repeated his claim during a private meeting with Hill leaders, without evidence, that he only lost the popular vote because millions of people illegally voted for Hillary Clinton.

Pelosi confronted Trump during that meeting, telling him his claim was false.

Now, Democrats are shooting back. In an attempt to prove Trump wrong with their own investigation, a trio of House Democrats sent a letter to top law officials in all 50 states and Washington, D.C., calling for a list of any known cases of voting fraud during the election.

The thing that I worry about with this argument about voter fraud is it gives the Republicans and others another tool and another reason to justify to the public of denying people the right to vote, Rep. Elijah Cummings, ranking Democrat on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, said on MSNBC. Assistant House Minority Leader Jim Clyburn (D-S.C.) and Rep. Bob Brady (D-Pa.), top Democrat on House Administration Committee, also signed the letter.

The president can join me and my staff, and we will show him that there is no voter fraud, Cummings continued. The thing I do want him to do, I want him to investigate, are all of the people who don't get the chance to vote, who have been denied the right to vote.

The claim has been debunked by numerous independent fact-checkers. Some Republicans, including House Speaker Paul Ryan and Sen. Lindsey Graham, agreed this week that there is no evidence to support it.

In general, voter fraud in American elections is rare, and widespread voter fraud is virtually nonexistent. While one 2012 Pew Research study found that some voter registration records were out of date because people had died or moved, the studys author, David Becker, has said that there is zero evidence that voter fraud resulted from them.

Still, in recent years, generally Republican-led state legislatures have cited fears of voter fraud to make a case for enacting new regulations around voting, like voter ID laws. Civil rights groups charge that those restrictions are discriminatory because they disproportionately affect minorities and young people who lack government-issued photo identification and also tend to vote for Democrats.

Liberals sounded the alarm on Wednesday that Trumps talk of voter fraud could be used to support more of those measures going forward.

Sen. Bernie Sanders, a progressive independent who challenged Clinton for the Democratic presidential nomination last year, replied to Trumps tweet on Wednesday and charged that the president is telling Republicans to accelerate voter suppression, to make it harder for the poor, young, elderly and people of color to vote.

The great political crisis we face is not voter fraud, which barely exists. Its voter suppression and the denial of voting rights, he wrote. Our job is to fight back and do everything we can to protect American democracy from cowardly Republican governors and legislators.

David Axelrod, former chief strategist of Barack Obamas presidential campaigns, said on CNN: What I fear on this voter fraud stuff is that it becomes an impetus for those who want to further erode voter protections for people who legitimately want to vote and are facing a series of barriers.

If you want to investigate voting in this country, probably the most productive thing you can do is investigate that and try to ascertain whether these stringent new requirements in some states have, or more stringent new requirements, have kept some people from voting, he added.

Aidan Quigley contributed to this report.

Read the original post:
Democrats warn Trump's voter fraud investigation will increase voter suppression - Politico

The Democrats Need to Figure This Thing Out – Esquire.com

So apparently the big noise in Democratic circles is this guy Pete Buttigieg, the openly gay mayor of South Bend, Indiana, wherein lies a nice little Catholic university that did not upset the Number One team in the nation Tuesday night. (Sorry for the diversion, but I take my wins where I can find them these days.) He has emerged as what used to be called "the Compromise Italian" during papal conclaves in the days before the Holy Spirit went crazy and started picking Poles, Germans, and Argentines. He's the consensus middle choice between Keith Ellison and Tom Perez. Frankly, I can live with any of these guys, although my preference is for Ellison, not least because he's willing to give up a safe congressional seat to do this thankless job.

Advertisement - Continue Reading Below

However, it is also my considered opinion that the Democratic Party should get its shit together in one quick hurry. Waiting until March, and dragging out a pointless internal slanging match for three months, is such typically Democratic bungling that it's almost classic. Get a chairman because, cats and kittens, they're coming already for what's left of you.

Let us take, for a moment, Senator Professor Warren. She's undoubtedly Target A in 2018, if only to derail any possibility that she'll run for president. She would be a big prize in any case. They're already running attack ads against her on the radio up here and, on Tuesday, WBUR, one of the local public radio stations in Boston, came out with a poll that was remarkably gloomy on her prospects for re-election.

Melina Mara

There are other factors in play as well. First of all, there is no shortage of ambitious Republican tech millionnaires up here who can self finance a serious challenge. (Keep an eye on this guy Rick Green, an auto parts magnate who's close to Republican Governor Charlie Baker. Also keep an eye on Curt Schilling, if only for laughs.) Second, you can count on local press to stumble all over itself being fair to whoever the Republican candidate is. (More than a few people are nettled that Warren has failed to kiss up the way the the local press thinks it deserves.) Third, believe it or not, and sometimes even I don't, there are purity trolls on the left who have not forgiven her for endorsing Hillary Clinton last June, and for not jumping aboard the Bernie bandwagon prior to the Massachusetts primary.

She's not a lock, basically, is what I'm saying. And the one thing she doesn't need is a lengthy squabble over who's running the party, especially one that leaves delicate fee-fees wounded for months.

Our Most Dangerously Retrograde Government

(And all of that was the case before SPW announced that she would be voting for a completely unqualified space alien, Ben Carson, to run the Department of Housing and Urban Development. This is going to require some 'splainin' back home.)

There are 23 Democratic seats up in 2018. Angus King and Bernie, the two independents, also will be running for re-election. There is no such thing as a mortal lock. And, by the way, if you think I'm a special pleader in this case, then look around the country. They're coming for Tammy Baldwin in Wisconsin, too.

Update (2:16 PM): Yeah, they're coming for her. Watch nervous Democrats run.

Respond to this post on the Esquire Politics Facebook page.

Originally posted here:
The Democrats Need to Figure This Thing Out - Esquire.com