Archive for the ‘Democrats’ Category

Democrats are pushing a National Climate Bank – The Verge

The idea of a National Climate Bank is catching on in Congress, and it could infuse billions of dollars into efforts to eliminate the USs planet-heating carbon emissions. A handful of Congressional proposals have been made over the past year calling for the government to start investing in technology upgrades and inventions that would cut down on greenhouse gases. Funds from the National Climate Bank would ideally lower the financial risks associated with green innovation encouraging private investors to throw more money into the pot, without shifting costs to consumers. The hope is that the bank can tackle everything from building up the infrastructure for electric vehicles and solar power storage, to making communities more resilient to the effects of climate change.

A National Climate Bank is at the center of a broad set of policies proposed this month by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce. The effort, called the Climate Leadership and Environmental Action for our Nations (CLEAN) Future Act, is aimed at bringing greenhouse gas emissions down to essentially zero by 2050. The National Climate Bank would pull together the public and private investment needed to transition to an economy with pretty much no carbon footprint. It builds on bills introduced in both the House and Senate that would create an independent nonprofit bank capitalized with $35 billion in federal funds. That bank could mobilize up to $1 trillion in total public and private investment over three decades, advocates estimate.

Its a business-friendly environmental strategy with bipartisan appeal and a proven track record thanks to the success of state and local green banks, advocates of the national bank say.

I think this should be one of the less controversial provisions that people talk about, because I dont care who you are, we need to be investing in innovation and technology, Congresswoman Debbie Dingell (D-MI) tells The Verge. Dingell introduced the National Climate Bank Act bill in the House in December. Senator Ed Markey (D-NY) introduced a similar bill in the Senate in July. The bank theyre proposing would be able to fund projects directly and funnel cash into existing regional green banks.

Over the past decade, state and city green banks have popped up across the US. These arent banks you deposit money into. They bring together public, private, and philanthropic capital to push clean energy projects forward that otherwise might not get off the ground. Since the the concept first got rolling in 2009, 14 green banks across the nation have generated $3.67 billion in clean energy investment, according to an annual report from the American Green Bank Consortium, a membership organization for green banks and financing groups.

Congresswoman Dingell points to Michigans green bank, Michigan Saves, as one successful model. Its financed about $220 million in local environmental projects since its founding in 2009. For each public dollar the state puts in, it can mobilize $30 in private investment, according to Michigan Saves president and CEO Mary Templeton. A majority of that has gone to residents who, say, want to upgrade their homes with solar power or insulation to become more energy efficient. The challenges the bank faces now, Templeton tells The Verge, have to do with scaling up and reaching low to moderate income communities where some people might not quality for traditional credit.

The National Climate Bank could help in both areas, she hopes. And theres another green bank floating around Congress that could give Michigan Saves a boost too. The Green Bank Act of 2019 has also been introduced by legislators in both chambers. That would set up a United States Green Bank within the Department of the Treasury, which would issue up to $50 billion in Green Bonds as a way to provide more capital to state and local green banks.

The idea for a National Climate Bank has failed in Congress before. Legislative efforts to establish such a bank flopped in 2009, 2014, and 2017. And the business-friendly appeal of a National Climate Bank hasnt gained as much traction with more left-leaning Democrats. The push for the bank has for the most part come from moderate Democrats who are less skeptical of relying on the market to fix the problems it created with its dependence on fossil fuels.

Things could be different this time around. Writing the National Climate Bank into the CLEAN Future Act, which has been billed as a more moderate alternative to the Green New Deal, is a sign that the idea could be gaining ground. And with United Nations scientists advising that the world needs to cut its carbon habit by 2050 to avoid catastrophic effects of climate change, urgency is building to take action and involve the private sector.

Its not Wall Streets job to solve climate change, says Jeffrey Schub, executive director of the Coalition for Green Capital, which has pushed the green bank and climate bank bills. Still, he adds, There are self-interested reasons they should want to invest in decarbonization. Schub points out that there are unimaginably large risks to businesses associated with climate change. The climate crisis could cost the US economy hundreds of billions of dollars each year by 2090, by some estimates.

Climate change has also emerged as a key 2020 election issue for Democrats, and people are already placing early bets on the policies that could move forward if a Democrat is elected the next president.

The window of opportunity and interest is growing at the federal level right now, says Schub. Lots of smart folks realize that now is the time to start laying out blueprints for climate action in 2021.

Read more from the original source:
Democrats are pushing a National Climate Bank - The Verge

Sanders set to crush 2020 Democratic rivals in primary in deeply conservative state – Washington Examiner

Bernie Sanders is poised to score a big win in one of the nation's deepest red states.

Sanders, 78, has a double-digit advantage in socially conservative Utah, according to a new poll by the Salt Lake Tribune and Suffolk University. The Vermont senator, a socialist, has 26.5% of the vote among Democrats likely to vote in the state's primary on March 3 surveyed, trailed by his Massachusetts counterpart and ideological ally Elizabeth Warren's 14.4%.

Meanwhile, the Democratic race for the 2020 presidential nomination's top center-left candidate, former Vice President Joe Biden, has 12.1% support, the poll found. He's followed by a rival for the moderate lane, former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who is at 9.9%. Bloomberg entered the contest late and is forgoing the early-voting states in favor of Super Tuesday ones. The other contender for center-left votes, former mayor of South Bend, Indiana, Pete Buttigieg, was further behind with 5%.

Sanders won Utah's 2016 Democratic caucuses, trouncing then-opponent former first lady and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton by almost 60 percentage points.

[Also read: Sanders campaign predicting victory in Iowa caucuses]

While Utah, this election cycle, will host a primary election, Sanders, a former Vermont congressman and the mayor of Burlington, is still boosted by young people and liberals, despite Republicans controlling the governor's mansion and the state House. Then-candidate Donald Trump also walloped Clinton in Utah during the 2016 general election by 45 percentage points.

No Democrat has won Utah in a general election since President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1964.

The Utah poll coincides with other Super Tuesday surveys providing a shot in the arm to Sanders surging second bid for the White House. On Wednesday, a Texas poll put Sanders in front of Biden, endangering the 36-year Delaware senator's Southern strategy. This week a separate California poll had Sanders ahead in a state he also carried last time in vied to become the Democratic Party's standard-bearer.

Sanders's lead in Utah, however, may be overstated. Researchers for the Salt Lake Tribune and Suffolk University poll only surveyed 132 likely Democratic primary voters via the telephone between Jan. 18 and Jan. 22. Their findings have a margin of error of plus or minus 8.5 percentage points.

Read the original here:
Sanders set to crush 2020 Democratic rivals in primary in deeply conservative state - Washington Examiner

Letter to the editor: Pelosi, Democrats fear Trump – TribLIVE

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to ourTerms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sentvia e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

Read more from the original source:
Letter to the editor: Pelosi, Democrats fear Trump - TribLIVE

Iowa caucuses: Whos leading the polls ahead of the first Democratic primary contest – Vox.com

With the Iowa caucuses less than one week away, the 2020 Democratic primary is beginning to come into focus six new polls paint a vivid picture of whos in good shape before the first contest.

Nationally, former Vice President Joe Biden has been the frontrunner since before he announced his candidacy last April, and the latest national polls show him still topping the field, with a January Fox News poll finding he has 26 percent support, and a January ABC News/Washington Post poll showing 28 percent support.

But both polls found this lead to be threatened by Sen. Bernie Sanders, who has remained in second place in national polling averages since last November.

For much of late 2019, RealClearPolitics polling average showed Biden and Sanders separated by about 10 percentage points, but the former vice presidents lead has begun to narrow. Fox News latest poll puts Sanders directly below Biden at 23 percent support within that surveys 3 percentage point margin of error. Similarly, the ABC poll finds Sanders enjoying 24 percent support, again making Bidens lead within the polls 3.5 percentage point margin of error.

These polls give good insight into how voters outside the early states of Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, and Nevada are thinking about the candidates right now, but those opinions may change dramatically after the results of the first contests, particularly if the margins are stark in the final results.

Biden and Sanderss strong national showings dont mean they will win the nomination. At this point in 2016, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had a commanding lead on Sanders in polling averages, but only narrowly won Iowa and was defeated by the senator in Vermont. And President Trump, who had a nearly 15 percentage point lead on Sen. Ted Cruz, narrowly lost Iowa to the senator.

So while these national polls are somewhat instructive, it is important to remember that before Biden and Sanders can worry about Super Tuesday states, they and all their fellow candidates have to first make it out of Iowa.

In Iowa, the latest polls reveal momentum for Sanders, but also suggest the race is still very open, with Biden, Sanders, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, and former South Bend, Indiana, Mayor Pete Buttigieg forming a clear top tier, one that Sen. Amy Klobuchar could be poised to join.

Three of the four latest Iowa polls have Sanders as the caucuses frontrunner: An Emerson College poll puts his support at 30 percent; a New York Times/Siena College poll places him at 25 percent, and a CBS News/YouGov poll puts him at 26 percent. Biden leads in the fourth poll, from Suffolk University/USA Today, with 25.4 percent.

Biden is second in two of the polls led by Sanders (21 percent in Emerson College, and 25 percent in the CBS survey); Buttigieg is second in the Times poll, with 18 percent support. The CBS and Suffolk polls put the former mayor in third place; the Emerson poll in fourth. Warren is fourth in every poll, except for the Emerson survey, in which she is essentially tied with Buttigieg.

That tie is a telling one, as are most of the gaps between the candidates. Take the New York Times/Siena college poll for example, which has a margin of error of 3.9.

When that margin of error is taken into account, the frontrunner becomes less clear. Sanderss 25 percent support could be more like 21.1 percent support, and if thats the case, it could make Biden or Buttigieg the true frontrunner, and leave Klobuchar who was found to have 8 percent support ending the caucuses with backing that is more like 11.9 percent.

This isnt to say that Sienas pollsters or any others who have recently released results are wrong, but that the race is still very close.

Adding to the uncertainty are three things: the fact that many respondents told pollsters their choices arent set in stone, that second choices can be as (or more) important as first choices in Iowa, and that three key candidates Sanders, Warren, and Klobuchar havent been able to campaign recently.

Emersons pollsters found 38 percent of Iowa Democrats and independents arent yet sure how theyll caucus, a number large enough that could make or break someones campaign. Suffolks survey found similar results, with 45 percent saying they have a candidate they favor, but that they could still change their minds; and 13 percent said that, with days to go before the caucuses, they still arent even leaning toward one person in particular.

The good news for Sanders and Warren is that their supporters seem to be relatively locked in: Suffolk found about 60 percent of their current supporters said they are sure to caucus for them. About half 53 percent of Bidens supporters said they are committed to him. Buttigieg had a 48 percent commitment rate, and Klobuchar, 42 percent. The other polls showed similar results, with Warren and Sanders supporters being the most steadfast.

Iowas system of assessing candidate viability makes Iowans second choices of great importance essentially, Iowans who caucus for any candidate who does not receive at least 15 percent support in a given district are asked to caucus for their second choice.

Warren was the top second choice in the New York Times poll; Biden in the CBS survey. But its important to look at where that second choice support is coming from for instance, many of the polls found that Sanders supporters overwhelmingly said Warren is their second choice. But given recent polls, it seems unlikely that Sanders will fail to clear the 15 percent mark, meaning his caucusgoers will not be required to throw their support elsewhere.

Instead, the backers of candidates like entrepreneur Andrew Yang (whose support polled between 1 and 5 percent in these most recent surveys), or even Klobuchar, could make all the difference.

The New York Times and Emerson surveys found that most Klobuchar backers like Biden as a second choice which makes sense, given both occupy a moderate lane in the race. Emerson found 39 percent of Klobuchar supporters have Biden as their second choice; the New York Times put that number at 55 percent.

As is the case with the candidates in general, however, it isnt clear how set in stone these second choices really are. Suffolks pollsters asked likely caucusgoers who said they dont support any of that surveys top five candidates Biden, Sanders, Warren, Buttigieg, and Klobuchar who they would support if they had to choose from one of those five. And 75 percent said they had no idea.

They have less than a week to figure it out. And theyll have to do so without the benefit of direct interactions with the candidates all the sitting senators currently running are taking part in the Senate impeachment trial. Some candidates have expressed concern that the fact they cant do any last-minute campaigning will hurt them Sanders, for instance has told reporters, I would rather be in Iowa today. ... Id rather be in New Hampshire and Nevada and so forth.

But Suffolks work found the senators might not have anything to worry about: 88 percent of likely caucusgoers said the senators not being on the ground wont affect how they caucus; only 5.2 percent said, I expect candidates to be in Iowa to earn my vote.

All this means that no one candidate at least among those in the top tier has a clear overall advantage against the others in Iowa. Any one of them could win. Or a number of them could win, with one taking home the most delegates, another taking the popular vote, and a third dominating headlines for doing far better than expected. But for whoever does come out on top, Iowa will only be step one: A close race means every early contest matters in developing an electability narrative, and New Hampshires primary is up next.

Polls show Sanders as the current strongest candidate in Iowa and New Hampshire, and he seems to be closing in on Biden nationally. But Biden isnt exactly polling poorly in either of those first two states, and he has habitually topped polls in South Carolina, where voters will go to the polls at the end of February.

Warren has fallen from her perch atop the polls, but is a popular second choice and she is racking up endorsements, like the coveted Des Moines Register endorsement she received Saturday. Buttigieg has also seen his support shrink from its late 2019 heights, but he is holding on particularly in New Hampshire. And Klobuchar is making late gains in both Iowa and New Hampshire, now nearly cracking double digits in poll averages in each state.

Yang is also seeing something of a late rise not enough to break into the top tier, but one that will put him back on the Democratic debate stage ahead of the New Hampshire primary. Former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg, who is eschewing the early states in the hopes of raking in a massive delegate haul on Super Tuesday, is showing signs his strategy may be working: The latest national polls had favorable results, pushing the relative newcomer to the race up to a polling average of 8 percent.

All of this is to say, as primary season gets underway, that the race could still shake out in a number of unexpected ways.

Original post:
Iowa caucuses: Whos leading the polls ahead of the first Democratic primary contest - Vox.com

Geraldo Rivera: ‘Everything the Democrats allege’ about Trump ‘is probably true’ – Washington Examiner

Fox News correspondent Geraldo Rivera said Democrats allegations against President Trump in the impeachment trial are probably true but dont amount to a crime.

I believe that everything the Democrats allege is probably true. Everything they allege. I concede everything that the Democrats allege, except the hunting of the ambassador, Rivera told Mediaite in an interview published Tuesday.

I believe that the whole effort to get Ukraine to investigate Biden was seedy. None of it was criminal. If there was a crime, they would have spelled it out. I firmly believe no crime, no conviction in the impeachment trial, he added.

Still, Rivera, who has known Trump for decades, echoed the presidents attacks on impeachment, referring to it as a witch hunt.

I didnt vote for him last time, and I may not vote for [him] this time. But Ill be damned if Im going to let the Democrats get away with what I consider to be a very lame and hypocritical and partisan witch hunt, he said.

I totally agree with him that he is being and has been from the first second of his tenure hounded and harangued and harassed and hunted by the hypocritical Democrats who all assume high ground that they dont deserve because they had it out for him since the second he won the election, Rivera continued.

The House impeached Trump in December, alleging he abused his power when he sought to press Ukraine to investigate his political rival, Joe Biden.

Amid the Senate trial, Trumps former national security adviser John Boltons forthcoming book sent shock waves through Washington. A manuscript of the book said Trump made security aid to Ukraine conditional on an investigation into Biden.

Trump lawyer Alan Dershowitz argued Monday that the president did nothing wrong.

"If the president, any president, were to have done what the Times reported about the content of the Bolton manuscript, that would not constitute an impeachable offense," he said.

See original here:
Geraldo Rivera: 'Everything the Democrats allege' about Trump 'is probably true' - Washington Examiner