Archive for the ‘Donald Trump’ Category

Did a Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate advise on a plan to have … – WisconsinWatch.org

Reading Time: < 1 minute

Wisconsin Watch, a nonprofit newsroom, is partnering withGigafactto produce fact briefs bite-sized fact checks of trending claims.Sign up for ournewsletterfor more stories straight to your inbox.

Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate Daniel Kelly advised Republican Party officials on a plan to have a group of Wisconsin Republicans sign paperwork falsely claiming to be electors in the 2020 presidential election.

The plan failed. Wisconsins 10 Democratic electors voted for Joe Biden, who defeated Donald Trump in Wisconsin by 20,000-plus votes.

The Electoral College vote officially determines the outcome of presidential elections.

Former Wisconsin Republican Party chairman Andrew Hitt gave sworn testimony in February 2022 to the House Select Committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol.

Hitt testified to having pretty extensive conversations about the plan with Kelly, special counsel to the party. Hill also testified that before those December 2020 discussions, Kelly was not in the loop about the plan.

Kelly, a former state Supreme Court justice, is running against Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Janet Protasiewicz in the April 4 election.

This Fact Brief is responsive to conversations such asthis one.

Sources

Wisconsin WatchWisconsin Supreme Court candidate Dan Kelly was adviser for GOP

Milwaukee Journal SentinelBice: Supreme Court candidate Daniel Kelly was paid $120,000 by Republicans to work on election integrity, advise on fake electors

U.S. Government Publishing OfficeSelect committee to investigate the January 6th attack on the US Capitol, US House of Representatives, Washington DC, Deposition of: Andrew Hitt

Republish This Story

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Read more here:
Did a Wisconsin Supreme Court candidate advise on a plan to have ... - WisconsinWatch.org

Donald Trump is a former U.S. president, not the current commander … – PolitiFact

Amid speculation about the possible arrest of former President Donald Trump in connection with hush money paid to a woman several years ago, a recent Facebook post argues theres nothing "former" about his title.

"Hes not the former president according to federal and military laws and orders," the March 20 post says. It goes on to argue that under the U.S. Constitution, Trump is still commander in chief because he "became a wartime president in March 2020 with his direct order to federalize the National Guard to active duty."

This post was flagged as part of Facebooks efforts to combat false news and misinformation on its News Feed. (Read more about our partnership with Meta, which owns Facebook and Instagram.)

As weve previously reported on multiple occasions in response to conspiracy theories like this one, Trump is a former president, and President Joe Biden is the commander in chief. Trump left office in January 2021, when Biden was inaugurated.

Trump did declare himself a "wartime president" in March 2020 as the country tried to stop the spread of COVID-19, then relatively new on the scene.

But only Congress can declare war, and plenty of administrations have mobilized the U.S. National Guard without the expectation that theyd stay in office after they were voted out, as Trump was.

The Constitution, meanwhile, clearly states that the president "shall hold his office during the term of four years."

In a March 18 Truth Social post, Trump even referred to himself as a "former president."

We rate claims that Trump is still president and commander in chief Pants on Fire!

Read the rest here:
Donald Trump is a former U.S. president, not the current commander ... - PolitiFact

Opinion | Donald Trumps History with Manhattan D.A. Office – The New York Times

All the while, the contributions continued: Mr. Trump gave to the P.A.L. and to the D.A. himself. In his 1985 re-election race, as Mr. Morgenthau faced an early challenge from the civil rights lawyer C. Vernon Mason, Mr. Trump gave $5,000 the campaigns second-largest contribution. In 2005, Mr. Trump hosted a fund-raiser for the D.A. at Trump Tower. In part, Mr. Trump agreed to host the event because a rumor had reached the D.A. that Mr. Trumps sons were raising funds for Leslie Crocker Snyder, Mr. Morgenthaus challenger.

The prosecutors who led Mr. Morgenthaus investigations division across the decades were, as of late, emphatic in their defense, explaining why the office never began a full-scale investigation of Mr. Trumps business: Why didnt Morgenthau do anything? Because there was nothing to do, said Michael Cherkasky, his investigations chief for six years. The assistants, like their former boss, blamed the political process. You have to raise money to run for D.A., said Mr. Cherkasky. You ask people for money, and you cant do anything in return for it. Theres no favors. Theres no nothing.

The P.A.L. was the beginning, but Mr. Trump gave his biggest check to the other charity Mr. Morgenthau chaired. In 2012, Mr. Trump gave $100,000 to the Museum of Jewish Heritage, only after the D.A. complained that Mr. Trumps son-in-law Jared Kushner, a new museum board member and the scion of Kushner Companies, the family real estate company, had failed to make good on a promised donation. Mr. Morgenthau knew Mr. Kushner: He interned in the D.A.s office in 2004, the summer his father was arrested on federal charges. Nasty piece of work, the D.A. said of the younger Kushner: I had to kick him off the board.

LAST MONTH I returned to the D.A.s office to speak about Mr. Morgenthaus tenure and legacy. I told the prosecutors in the audience including those leading the investigation of the 45th president that from all Id learned about the D.A. and his relations with Mr. Trump, there was no mystery and no smoking gun. Their relationship made perfect sense.

Each saw opportunity in the other: The D.A., ever expedient in his drive to fund his favored causes, needed the checks, and the real estate man, ever eager to antagonize a business foe, sought an ally in law enforcement. The D.A. would not serve as a shield but more as a decoy for Mr. Trump, who could use his proximity to Mr. Morgenthaus power to enhance his own reputation. The D.A. had a blind spot when it came to Mr. Trump, one he would recognize years later. In his final years, Mr. Morgenthau witnessed a new blood lust demonization of immigrants and people of color, the rise of white supremacy and was taken aback. One morning in the spring before his death, I asked Mr. Morgenthau what his greatest fear was, and he did not hesitate to answer: Trump.

Go here to read the rest:
Opinion | Donald Trumps History with Manhattan D.A. Office - The New York Times

Alvin Bragg, the progressive prosecutor who could take down Donald Trump – Yahoo News

Alvin Bragg, Manhattan district attorney, in New York in December 2022. (Christopher Goodney/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

The Anointed One: That was how the Harvard Crimson titled its 1995 profile of Alvin L. Bragg Jr., then a graduating senior at the college. Harvard was full of ambitious young people, but Bragg seemed destined for something exceptional, a product of Harlem who had gone to one of the most prestigious private schools in Manhattan and had emerged as a campus leader in Cambridge, Mass.

As a freshman, Bragg organized and moderated a dialogue between Black and Jewish students to ease tensions over a talk by Leonard Jeffries, the notoriously antisemitic and homophobic City College of New York professor who had been hosted by the Harvard Black Students Association. The following year, he tried to resolve the controversy engendered by professor Harvey Mansfield, an outspoken conservative who charged that grade inflation was the product of a diversifying student body.

Already, there was talk of Bragg entering politics. I would push him toward elective politics because he's the perfect example of a crossover politician who can draw votes from both white and Black voters, Harvards dean of students told the Crimson.

Bragg would run for office many years later, after working for state and federal prosecutors, becoming Manhattans first Black district attorney after easily winning election in 2021. An unabashed progressive, he championed criminal justice reforms that grew in popularity after the protests that followed the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer in May 2020.

Then a candidate for Manhattan DA, Bragg speaks to the press after casting his ballot on Nov. 2, 2021. (Mike Segar/Reuters)

But the 49-year-old is in the news today because he could be on the cusp of bringing the first-ever criminal charges against a former U.S. president. The charges stem from an assertion by Trumps former fixer Michael Cohen, who admitted in court that adult film actress Stormy Daniels was paid $130,000 in 2016 to keep quiet about an affair with the reality television star, who was then days away from what would be his successful election as president. Although the inquiry into the payment seemed to have stalled, it was recently revived; Daniels met with prosecutors in New York last week.

Story continues

To make his case, Bragg is expected to use a New York state statute related to fraudulent bookkeeping, a risky strategy that could backfire if jurors become mired in legal complexities. Then theres the fact that conservatives are claiming Bragg is motivated by politics, as Trump is mounting a new White House run.

Its impossible to overstate Mr. Braggs bad judgment here, the Wall Street Journals editorial board decreed, calling the district attorney a provincial progressive from New York City who did not understand the media and political firestorm he was about to unleash.

Trump says he expects to be arrested Tuesday and has called for protests if that turns out to be the case.

Bragg, for his part, says he will pursue charges if they are warranted, without regard for political ramifications. We do not tolerate attempts to intimidate our office or threaten the rule of law in New York, he said over the weekend.

Former President Donald Trump speaks at a rally in March 2022 in Commerce, Ga. (Megan Varner/Getty Images)

A clash between Trump and Bragg was all but inevitable, given that Bragg pledged to focus on the former presidents alleged wrongdoings when he took office in late 2021. Not only that, but the two men represent starkly different visions of the American dream, and the American future as well as of who the law should and should not prosecute.

Much like Trump, Bragg is a native New Yorker, but the two could not have come from more different worlds. While the future president grew up wealthy in suburban Queens, Bragg was raised on Strivers Row, a legendary block of well-maintained row houses in Central Harlem where members of the citys Black elite had long resided amid surrounding crime and poverty. Even during the desperate 1980s, when neglect swept over the city and crack cocaine ravaged Black neighborhoods, Strivers Row remained a reserve of genteel Black aspiration.

Braggs middle-class parents sent him to Trinity School, one of the citys most prestigious private schools. With its rigorous academic standards and historic ties to the nations best colleges, the question at Trinity is not whether any students will get into an Ivy League school each year, but how many will do so.

Still, Bragg was a young Black man in a city beset by violence. The New York Police Department sometimes took flagrant liberties, expecting little consequence from a terrified public.

Before I was 21 years old, I had a gun pointed at me six times: three by police officers and three by people who were not police officers. I had a knife to my neck, a semi-automatic gun to my head and a homicide victim on my doorstep, Bragg would later write of his upbringing.

An NYPD officer blocks traffic as construction workers march to observe Workers Memorial Day on April 28, 2022, in New York City. (Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images)

Bragg attended Abyssinian Baptist Church, one of Harlems most storied houses of worship. He continues to do so today, also teaching there. That hour with the Sunday school is one of the best hours of the week, he said in early 2022, shortly after taking office.

After Trinity, Bragg went to Harvard College and then to Harvard Law School. There he served as the editor of the Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, which bills itself as the nations leading progressive law journal. He came home for a prestigious clerkship with a liberal judge in the Southern District of New York, which includes Manhattan and tends to prosecute some of the nations most high-profile criminal cases.

For all of Braggs life, Manhattans district attorney had been Robert Morgenthau, a towering figure who decided to leave the storied office at 1 Hogan Place in 2009 after 34 years of unimaginable influence on city life.

His successor was Cyrus R. Vance Jr. Like Morgenthau a white son of wealth and power, Vance was criticized for lacking courage, especially when it came time to prosecute potentially influential figures. At the same time, he was at odds with a burgeoning criminal justice reform movement that sought corrections for racial injustices.

Then-Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee in 2019. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Bragg had spent the late 1990s and the first decade of the new century working in a variety of legal roles for both the state and city of New York. In 2009, he earned a position as a federal prosecutor with the Southern District, where he had served as a clerk several years before.

Then, in 2015, then state Attorney General Eric Schneiderman appointed Bragg to prosecute cases where unarmed civilians die during interactions with law enforcement. Two years later, Schneiderman named Bragg the states chief deputy attorney general.

The following year, Schneiderman was forced to resign after a spate of sexual assault and substance abuse allegations. Bragg left for New York Law School, where he was appointed co-director of a racial justice initiative.

Rumors were mounting by then that Vance would not seek reelection, especially as outrage over his 2015 decision not to prosecute film producer Harvey Weinstein on a variety of sexual assault charges only seemed to deepen with the advent of the #MeToo movement.

Bragg announced that he would run for Manhattan district attorney in 2019, two years before the primary. Im running because far too often, we have two standards of justice one for the rich and powerful and connected and another for everyone else, he told the Amsterdam News, a historically Black newspaper.

Activists demanding police accountability march in 2019 to commemorate the five-year anniversary of Michael Browns killing by a Ferguson, Mo., police officer. (Erik McGregor/LightRocket via Getty Images)

The following summers racial justice protests seemed to bolster Braggs argument that prosecutors could and must embrace progressive priorities like decarceration and police accountability. Led by Larry Krasner of Philadelphia, the progressive prosecution movement was spreading to San Francisco, Los Angeles and elsewhere, becoming a national phenomenon.

Bragg stood to benefit from the trend, even after the protests subsided. If his ideas were once radical, they were now firmly in the liberal mainstream.

I learned that you must keep pushing, despite the strong political and social headwinds. You will be criticized by someone maybe even everyone no matter what you do, he wrote in a September 2020 op-ed for USA Today. Relationships with law enforcement will be strained. Commentators will second guess your every move. I always told my team to feel liberated by this.

The establishments favored candidate was Tali Farhadian Weinstein, a Yale-educated attorney who reflected wealthier Manhattanites unease about soft-on-crime approaches. But her personal wealth and ties to high finance made Weinstein unpalatable to a motivated base.

In June 2021, Bragg prevailed in the Democratic primary, all but ensuring victory in Novembers general election. His ascension seemed to terrify conservatives, and some moderates, as a trend of increased violent crime continued.

New York City Mayor Eric Adams in Times Square on Monday in New York City. (Alexi Rosenfeld/Getty Images)

A conflict between the citys new tough-on-crime Mayor Eric Adams and Bragg seemed almost certain, but the new district attorney promised not to stray from his ideals. I will govern tirelessly from the perspective of the communities most impacted by the justice system, he said as he took the oath of office on Jan. 1, 2022.

But his tenure began with a series of challenges. In a guidance to his staff, Bragg said he would decline to seek prison sentences for some offenses, leading to widespread criticism.

His timing, however, was inauspicious, especially as Adams captured national attention with his pro-policing message. A month after Bragg issued the controversial guidance, the guidance was withdrawn.

Bragg also engendered controversy by declining to pursue a case against the Trump Organization related to the former presidents record of offering wildly divergent valuations of his property portfolio when asking private lenders for money or pushing the government to lower his property tax burden.

Two frustrated prosecutors resigned in protest of Braggs decision. One of them, Mark Pomerantz, recently published a book heavily critical of Bragg, who he depicted as overwhelmed and indecisive (the investigation in question was unrelated to the Stormy Daniels case).

In late 2022, Bragg won a 17-count fraud and conspiracy case against the Trump Organization for paying its top account through nominal business expenses to avoid tax liability though Trump himself was outside the scope of the charges.

Then-San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin at an election-night event on June 7, 2022. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

Bragg also appeared to at least partly tailor his messaging to allay public anxiety about crime; failing to make a similar shift had led Chesa Boudin, the former San Francisco district attorney, to lose a recall vote last June.

As he began his second year in office, Bragg told the New York Times that he would continue to go after Trump. I have every faith that other members of the team who are working on other parts of this endeavor using the same approach will lead to a result that is just, he said.

The potential charges against Trump will be the biggest test of Bragg yet, one the former presidents supporters are determined to make as difficult as possible.

Republicans in charge of the House Judiciary Committee have summoned Bragg to testify, and conservative media has been rife with charges that he is a woke prosecutor minted by the progressive billionaire George Soros, a favorite bogeyman of the right who has funded prosecutors like Boudin and Bragg.

However it ends, the Trump case is far from the first controversy of Braggs career.

It is unlikely to be the last.

See the article here:
Alvin Bragg, the progressive prosecutor who could take down Donald Trump - Yahoo News

What happened between Stormy Daniels and Donald Trump? – BBC

Updated 20 March 2023

Image source, Getty Images

President Donald Trump denies the allegations made by Stormy Daniels

Former US President Donald Trump is facing possible criminal charges over allegations he covered up hush money payments to ex-porn actress Stormy Daniels.

Ms Daniels claims she and Mr Trump had sex, and that she accepted $130,000 (100,000) from his former lawyer before the 2016 election in exchange for her silence on the encounter.

The lawyer, Michael Cohen, was later jailed on multiple charges.

The former president has denied he had any sexual involvement with Ms Daniels since the allegations surfaced in 2018.

Stormy Daniels goes public with affair claim

Ms Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, has said in media interviews that she met Mr Trump at a charity golf tournament in July 2006.

She alleged the pair had sex once in his hotel room at Lake Tahoe, a resort area between California and Nevada. A lawyer for Mr Trump "vehemently" denied this at the time.

"He didn't seem worried about it. He was kind of arrogant," she said in response to an interviewer's question asking if Mr Trump had told her to keep quiet about their alleged night together.

Mr Trump's wife at the time, Melania Trump, was not at the tournament and had just given birth.

Threats and payments to stay silent

In 2016, days before the US presidential election, Ms Daniels said Mr Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen paid her $130,000 in "hush money" to keep her quiet about the affair.

She said she took it because she was concerned for the safety of her family.

Ms Daniels said she was legally and physically threatened to stay silent.

In 2011, shortly after she agreed to give an interview to In Touch magazine about the alleged affair, she said an unknown man had approached her and her infant daughter in a Las Vegas car park and told her to "leave Trump alone".

The interview with In Touch would not be published in full until 2018.

Before the 60 Minutes episode aired, a shell company linked to Mr Cohen threatened Ms Daniels with a $20m lawsuit, arguing she had broken their non-disclosure deal (NDA), or "hush agreement".

Ms Daniels told the CBS show she was risking a million-dollar fine by speaking on national television, but "it was very important to me to be able to defend myself".

To play this content, please enable JavaScript, or try a different browser

Stormy Daniels told CBS News 'I was threatened' in a 2018 interview

Is it illegal to pay hush money?

It is not illegal to pay someone compensation in exchange for an NDA.

But since the payment was made a month before the presidential election, Mr Trump's critics argued the money could amount to a campaign violation.

In August 2018, Mr Cohen pleaded guilty to tax-evasion and breaking campaign finance rules, in part related to his payment to Ms Daniels and another alleged Trump lover.

Although he initially said that Mr Trump had nothing to do with the payments, Mr Cohen later testified under oath that Mr Trump had directed him to make the hush payment of $130,000 days before the 2016 election.

He also said the president reimbursed him for the payment.

Mr Trump has acknowledged personally reimbursing the payment, which isn't illegal, but denied the affair and any wrongdoing regarding campaign laws.

Mr Cohen was jailed on multiple counts after he pleaded guilty to violating laws during the 2016 presidential election.

Could Trump be indicted?

Over the weekend, Mr Trump said he believes he will be arrested on Tuesday.A spokesperson later clarified they had not been notified about any coming indictment.

Earlier this year, New York City District Attorney Alvin Bragg set up a grand jury to investigate whether there was enough evidence to pursue a prosecution against the former president over the money paid to Ms Daniels.

He is the person who will decide whether or not there will be an indictment, if one were issued.

A grand jury is held behind closed doors, and set up by a prosecutor to determine whether there is enough evidence to pursue charges in a case.

If charges are issued, it would be the first criminal case ever brought against a former US president.

On his social media network, Truth Social, Mr Trump called the investigation a political witch-hunt by a "corrupt, depraved, and weaponised justice system".

Read more:
What happened between Stormy Daniels and Donald Trump? - BBC