Archive for the ‘Donald Trump’ Category

Jimmy Kimmel Not Surprised by Trump Fraud Allegations – The New York Times

Welcome to Best of Late Night, a rundown of the previous nights highlights that lets you sleep and lets us get paid to watch comedy. Here are the 50 best movies on Netflix right now.

Late-night hosts were not surprised to hear that New York States attorney general, Letitia James, is accusing Donald Trumps family business of repeatedly misrepresenting the value of its assets.

One year ago today, Donald Trump was still in the White House, throwing chicken nuggets at the TV, and one year from today, he could be in jail, Jimmy Kimmel said.

For almost two hours, Biden took question after question about Russia, Covid, voter rights. He really got into why Dennys breakfast menu is so sticky all the time. JIMMY KIMMEL

The president took a lot of questions, too many questions. You know how at the end of most press conferences, the reporters are yelling Mr. President, Mr. President!? At the end of this one, they were like, Goodbye. Were good. We got plenty. JIMMY KIMMEL

On Wednesdays Late Show, Christine Baranski said fans who mistake her for her sophisticated characters wouldnt believe how loud she gets when watching the Buffalo Bills.

Twitter legend Dionne Warwick will pop by Thursdays Late Show.

See original here:
Jimmy Kimmel Not Surprised by Trump Fraud Allegations - The New York Times

WATCH: Jason Aldean Talks About New Year’s Eve With Donald Trump – Taste of Country

Prior to New Year's Eve 2021, Jason Aldean had never partied with a United States president, either former or active. In fact, before his night at Donald Trump's New Year's Eve party, he'd never met a president, and from the looks of it, he's still buzzing.

Talking to Taste of Country Nights, Aldean shares that he's met all types of celebrities as a headlining country musicact for nearly 20 years. This was about coolest, though.

"Being around somebody like a president, that's a whole different level of celebrity," the "Trouble With a Heartbreak" singer says. "Especially with President Trump."

During the full interview, Aldean opens up about the several days he spent with 45th president of the United States. He alsoreveals the very personal reason whyhe'sbecome more politically active in recent months.

"It was really cool man," Aldean adds. "I got to spend a couple of days with him, played golf with him, got to know him a little bit and it was definitely a different kind of new year."

Aldean also dishes on what it would take to get wife Brittany to sing a duet with him.

"Trouble With a Heartbreak" isthe country star's new single from his upcoming Georgia album, due in April. It's the companion album to Macon,released last fall, and a continuation ofits sound and structure. Ten new songs will be followed by five live tracks to give fans a well-rounded idea of whereAldean is musically, plus where he's been and where he's headed.

The Grammy-nominated "If I Didn't Love You" with Carrie Underwood was the only single from Macon, althoughAldean's cover of Bryan Adams' "Heaven" became very popular.

The first half of this interview finds Aldean digging intothe process of song selection. The 44-year-old also takes stock of his career thus far and explains what it would take for him to retire.

Aldean paid $4.1 million for the new 5-bedroom, 5-bathroom, 4,452-square-foot beach house. The spectacular property affords the singer and his family the opportunity to walk out their back door and down a bridge to their own private beach, and the exterior of the villa features a courtyard with iron gates that includes gas lanterns, a swimming pool and a fountain.

The home's interior includes a downstairs with an open floorplan and oversized windows, chiseled stone floors, a gourmet kitchen, a bedroom and study and a fireplace, with coffered ceilings throughout. The upstairs of the home includes two separate master bedrooms that both overlook the Gulf, as well as two more bedrooms that each have their own attached bathrooms.

The stunning home is also set for whatever weather might blow in from the Gulf. Built in 2005, the house features all-impact windows and doors, as well as Geo-Thermal heating and cooling, cellulose insulation, foam ceiling and floor insulation and more.

Original post:
WATCH: Jason Aldean Talks About New Year's Eve With Donald Trump - Taste of Country

Omicron news, Donald Trump, Russia & more: Whats trending today – cleveland.com

A look at some of the top headlines trending online today around the world including what you need to know about potential problems for Donald Trump, updates on the Russia-Ukraine standoff, the latest developments surrounding the Omicron surge and much more.

N.Y. Attorney General Outlines Pattern of Possible Fraud at Trump Business (NY Times)

Rudy Giuliani, three other Trump allies subpoenaed in January 6 riot probe (CNBC)

Former Trump officials plotting effort to blunt his impact on elections: report (The Hill)

Blinken launches fresh diplomatic push in Ukraine as fears of Russian invasion mount (NBC)

Airlines scrap or change flights to U.S. over 5G dispute, even though technologys rollouts been delayed near some airports (AP)

Federal N95 mask giveaway will start soon (cleveland.com)

Omicron is not that mild: 50,000 to 300,000 more US deaths projected by March (USA Today)

Nearly 1 million pediatric Covid cases reported last week (NBC)

COVID-19 health emergency could be over this year, WHO says (ABC)

Lawmakers call for investigation into at-home COVID test price gouging (CBS)

Fashion Icon and Former Vogue Creative Director Andr Leon Talley Dead at 73 (People)

Dallas Cowboys Dak Prescott apologizes for comments about fans throwing objects at officials (ESPN)

Harder They Fall, Insecure, H.E.R. nab NAACP awards noms (AP)

Microsoft buys gaming giant Activision Blizzard for $68.7 billion (AP)

Go here to read the rest:
Omicron news, Donald Trump, Russia & more: Whats trending today - cleveland.com

Trumps 1/6 finished the job of 9/11 – Al Jazeera English

We should be grateful for such small mercies.

In a rare moment of lucidity, Donald Trump has abandoned plans to take part in what would have amounted to a Satanic-like version of Groundhog Day, by informing his army of culpable MAGA-hat-wearing worshippers that he will not reprise his role as insurrectionist-in-chief on the first anniversary of the storming of Capitol Hill.

Trump had intended, no doubt, to launch into one of his signature diatribes to absolve himself of responsibility for the seminal role he played in what is emerging, drip by incriminating drip, to have been a coordinated but, ultimately, failed coup dtat.

Reportedly, Trump remains holed up at his gaudy version of Shangri-La the Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida at the urging of his circle of reliable sycophants who advised that his habit of droning on and on extemporaneously might further implicate him in the violent desecration of the United States Constitution a year ago.

Trump was also miffed that his incoherent, lie-laced remarks would not be televised, denying this preening narcissist the validation that apparently gives his vacant life the ephemeral attention a twice-impeached president and pampered brat requires like he requires oxygen in almost equal measure.

Alas, our reprieve from having to endure another spasm of Trumps lunatic tantrums will be brief since he plans to say what he proposed to say today at a rich white mans never-ending grievance-fest sorry, rally slated for later this month in Arizona.

Still, it is a relief that, for once, Trump has opted, surprisingly, to shut up largely out of self-preservation, of course particularly on a day that, given its historical import, will, I suspect, be remembered and reviled by enlightened Americans in the same vein as 9/11.

It is worth recalling that the terrorists who attacked the US on that date may have been plotting to destroy the Capitol as well. They were thwarted by brave passengers and crew on board United Flight 93 who, ironically, organised another type of insurrection to save lives (possibly) at the Capitol at the expense of their own.

So, arguably, on January 6, 2021, Trump and his band of fanatical allies in Congress and at the White House helped finish the job begun by a band of fanatics on 9/11. Instead of a plane, the MAGA mob ransacked and overwhelmed the seat of US democracy by virtue of their rampaging numbers and with any weapon at hand.

Trumps crass revisionism about what happened this time last year on Capitol Hill and why it happened has been taken up by the usual and some unusual suspects.

The usual suspects, like Trump, feed their viewers and readers a geyser of lies about what happened and why it happened for the same rank reasons as their dear, delusional leader money, notoriety and to disfigure history.

They have no shame. Hence, they cannot be shamed.

It is the unusual suspects, including several lapsed progressive writers, who should be ashamed of belittling the Trump-led insurrection simply as a gathering of aggrieved Americans gone slightly awry or giving sustenance to the crackpot claim that the FBI secretly fomented the furious mayhem as part of a false flag operation.

Like smug conspiracy-mongers, they cling to minor discrepancies to challenge the official story in their fantastical effort to dismiss the seriousness of a calculated and determined attempt to prevent the certification of a new president elected by a healthy plurality of voters.

Move over, Oliver Stone. You have ludicrous company.

Meanwhile, a gaggle of centrist columnists outside the US, has penned their de rigueur commemorative missives that contemplate with varying degrees of apocalyptic horror the lasting significance and consequences of the traumatic bedlam of 1/6.

In Canada, a number of pundits have suddenly experienced remarkable epiphanies and now recognise the existential threat that Trump and his legion of frothing, AK-47-toting disciples pose to the institutional framework of Americas constitutional republic.

It took them a while.

I remember when these realpolitik-clich-spouting types lectured those of us who warned, years ago, that Trump was a flagrant fascist whose defining autocratic nature would inevitably lead to a brutal assault on the already fragile and corroded infrastructure of US democracy.

Despite Trumps litany of outrages that confirmed, again and again, his odious character and sinister designs, these sensible centrists insisted that this crude, but capable, authoritarian should be treated with grudging deference and respect lest he scuttle lucrative cross-border commerce or, worse, trigger a trade war.

Oh, how I remember when the keyboard cavalry condemned Canadas appeasement of that other, and long forgotten, menace to Western democratic values and principles, Saddam Hussein, when then Liberal Prime Minister Jean Chrtien refused to join the calamitous coalition of the willing.

Turns out, the critics of appeasement became the appeasers who, throughout Trumps egregious tenure as president, repeatedly cautioned against confronting his blatant anti-democratic modus operandi in favour of the national interest.

These days, the sensible centrists have done a stunning volte-face and lament that conditions are ripe for the imminent collapse of American democracy and that, by 2030, if not sooner, the country could be governed by a right-wing dictatorship.

In 2014, the suggestion that Donald Trump would become president would also have struck nearly everyone as absurd. But today we live in a world where the absurd regularly becomes real and the horrible commonplace, a Canadian political scientist wrote in a suitably centrist Canadian newspaper.

Not true.

Several astute observers, including the prescient writer and filmmaker, Michael Moore, warned, early on, that a wretched, ignorant, dangerous, part-time clown and full-time sociopath is going to be [Americas] next president.

And the horrible had become commonplace long before January 6, 2022. It is just that the sensible centrists in Canada and elsewhere chose wilfully and willingly to ignore it to mollify Trump.

They have, it appears, forgotten this, prompting a Royal Roads University professor to pen this astonishing paragraph: But now we must focus on the urgent problem of what to do about the likely unraveling of democracy in the United States. We need to start by fully recognising the magnitude of the danger.

Scores of wise, concerned people were focused on the urgent problem and recognised the magnitude of the danger prior to and immediately after Trump rode down a golden escalator to announce his candidacy for president in 2015.

They were ignored or ridiculed as nave idealists who did not understand how the real world works.

To irresponsible, habitually wrong, sensible centrists in Canada and beyond: A belated welcome to the real world.

Finally, the millions of enlightened Americans who have resisted Trump and pine, like me, to see him and his confederates paraded into a courtroom in appropriately coloured orange jumpsuits, were likely disappointed by Attorney General Merrick Garlands comments yesterday regarding the number of insurrectionists charged to date.

Hundreds of Trumps maniacal foot soldiers have been nabbed and some sentenced. Their leaders, so far, have escaped accountability and punishment.

On this score, Garland offered rather vague assurances that the Justice Department remains committed to holding all January 6 perpetrators, at any level, accountable under law whether they were present that day or otherwise criminally responsible for the assault on our democracy.

Garland then pleaded for patience with the course of the ongoing investigation.

[The probe will continue] as long as it takes and whatever it takes for justice to be done consistent with the facts and the law, the ponderous attorney general said.

Well, you best hurry, man, or there will be nothing left to save.

The views expressed in this article are the authors own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeeras editorial stance.

Read more from the original source:
Trumps 1/6 finished the job of 9/11 - Al Jazeera English

The January 6th Criminal Case Against Donald Trump – The New Yorker

In hindsight, Donald Trumps intentions could not appear clearer. During the final months of the 2020 Presidential race, he systematically conducted a disinformation campaign that convinced many of his supporters the election would be stolen by Democrats. After losing, he doubled down on those false claims and repeatedly pressured state election officials, Justice Department prosecutors, federal and state judges, members of Congress, and the Vice-President to overturn the results. After those efforts failed, he appeared at a rally in Washington, D.C., where he urged thousands of his supporters to stop Congress from certifying his defeat. For hours, as they stormed the Capitol, he failed to act.

Those steps, the leaders of the congressional committee investigating the January 6th attack on the Capitol contend, seemingly constitute a crime. But, based on the evidence made public so far, the unprecedented nature of Trumps actionstogether with the vagueness of laws regarding the certification of Presidential elections, legal loopholes, and his manipulation of otherscould allow the former President to escape being criminally charged for his role in events surrounding the attack.

A congressional staffer with knowledge of the committees investigation said that it is ongoing and too early to say what it will yield. The staffer pointed out that Trump has a history of trying to avoid explicitly implicating himself in wrongdoing over the years, as he did in the Oval Office call with Ukraines Presidentwhich, nevertheless, led to his first impeachment. Trump seems to have been very careful never to give an orderto strongly insinuate what should happen rather than giving an order, the staffer told me, comparing Trump with Henry II of England, who famously (perhaps apocryphally) engineered the murder of the Archbishop of Canterbury by signalling to subordinates his desire to be free of the religious leader without explicitly ordering it. The staffer, who asked not to be named, invoked a phrase said to have been uttered by the twelfth-century king: Who will rid me of this meddlesome priest?

Recent statements by the committee chair, Bennie Thompson, and the vice-chair, Liz Cheneyone of only two Republicans on the panelhave raised expectations that the panel will refer Trump to the Justice Department for criminal prosecution. Such a step would increase the political pressure on Attorney General Merrick Garland to prosecute Trump. In a television interview on Sunday, Thompson said that the panel is examining whether Trump committed a crime: If theres any confidence on the part of our committee that something criminal we believe has occurred, well make the referral. And Cheney, in a speech last month, mentioned a specific charge: Did Donald Trump, through action or inaction, corruptly seek to obstruct or impede Congresss official proceeding to count electoral votes?

Federal prosecutors in Washington have charged dozens of rioters who stormed the Capitol with felony counts of obstructing an official proceeding of Congress, which carry a potential sentence of up to twenty years. But legal experts said that convicting Trump of such a charge could be difficult. Ilya Somin, a libertarian legal scholar at George Mason University and a critic of the former President, told me that Trumps lawyers would likely argue that it did not apply to him because he did not enter the Capitol on January 6th. I think it is very clear that it applies to the people who entered the building, Somin said. If Trump did enter the building and lead the attack in person, it would be much easier to convict him of this and other offenses.

The congressional staffer with knowledge of the committees work said that the media had exaggerated Thompson and Cheneys statements. The criminal-referral stuff has gotten blown out of proportion, the staffer cautioned. It has become the shiny new object. (Another shiny new object emerged on Tuesday, when the committee asked the Fox News host Sean Hannity to voluntarily testify about text messages that hed sent which show he had advance knowledge regarding President Trumps and his legal teams planning for January 6th. Hannity warned against Republicans in Congress trying to overturn the results, writing on January 5th that he was very worried about the next 48 hours.) The staffer said that the committee is primarily focussed on creating a definitive history of events on January 6th and recommending laws and reforms that would prevent future attempts to overturn electionsgiving the American people the full picture of what happened and making recommendations to help insure that nothing like January 6th happens again.

Ultimately, the decision about whether to prosecute Trump lies with Garland, a former federal judge who has made restoring public faith in the political neutrality of the Justice Department his core goal. Despite Garlands attempts to divorce the Justice Department from politically charged prosecutions, it is increasingly clear that investigating Trump is becoming the defining issue of his tenure. The continued defiance of Trump and his allies is forcing Garland to make a decision faced by none of his predecessors: whether to prosecute a former President who tried to subvert an election and appears ready to do so again. Democrats are demanding that Garland move more aggressively, with Representative Ruben Gallego, of Arizona, declaring his effort so far weak and feckless, and contending that there are a lot more of the organizers of January 6th that should be arrested by now.

David Laufman, a former senior Justice Department official, said he disagreed with criticism of the Justice Department for not having already charged Trump criminally. Notwithstanding the horrors of January 6th, D.O.J. should not be pursuing criminal investigations or prosecutions against former President Trump or others connected to the attack on the Capitol unless both the facts and the law support doing so under established policy, he said. Its the Department of Justicenot the Department of Retributionand we dont want to see the rule of law eroded just to make us feel good. But Laufman also called for prosecutors to not go easy on Trump, adding that the department shouldnt be shying away from using the full weight of its enforcement authorities against Trump or anyone else simply because doing so could be perceived as politically motivated.

On Wednesday afternoon, Garland gave a speech that was clearly designed to reassure the public and counter critics. The twenty-five-minute address was vintage Garland. He pledged political neutrality and declared that we follow the factsnot an agenda or an assumption. He promised equal justice for all: There cannot be different rules depending on ones political party or affiliation. There cannot be different rules for friends and foes. And he vowed further measures. The actions we have taken thus far will not be our last, he said, adding that the Justice Department remains committed to holding all January 6th perpetrators, at any level, accountable under lawwhether they were present that day or were otherwise criminally responsible for the assault on our democracy.

In an era when the majority of Republicans falsely believe that the 2020 election was fraudulent and the majority of Democrats think that it was not, Garland will be demonized no matter what action he takes regarding Trump. The Attorney General, based on his speech, continues to believe that he can restore normal ordera Justice Department term for basing decisions on whether to charge defendants strictly on the facts of a case. He continues to believe that the majority of Americans still support the principle that all people should be treated fairly under the law, including Donald Trump. And that the majority will reject political violence and trust the judicial system. At the moment, that belief, for Garland and all Americans, is an enormous political gamble.

Read the rest here:
The January 6th Criminal Case Against Donald Trump - The New Yorker