Archive for the ‘Donald Trump’ Category

What is Trump hiding? The Capitol riot-sized hole in White House call log – The Guardian

At 2.26pm on 6 January last year, Donald Trump picked up a White House phone and placed a call to Mike Lee, the Republican senator from Utah. The communication came at a very significant moment.

Thirty-seven minutes earlier, a riot had been declared by Washington DC police. Minutes after that the then vice-president, Mike Pence, was rushed out of the Senate chamber, where he had been presiding over Congresss certification of Joe Bidens victory in the 2020 election, and put into hiding.

Fifteen minutes before Trump made the call his supporters, exhorted by the sitting president to fight like hell against what he falsely claimed was a rigged election, broke through a window in the south front of the Capitol and entered the heart of American democracy.

The January 6 insurrection was under way.

Yet when you look for recorded details of Trumps 2.26pm call which was made, as Hugo Lowell of the Guardian revealed, on an official White House landline, they are nowhere to be found. The Lee call was one of an unknown number that Trump made during a mysterious gap of 7 hours 37 minutes that exists in the call logs precisely the timeframe of the Capitol attack.

Those missing call logs, disclosed by the Washington Post and CBS News, raise several burning questions how did the records disappear? who carried out the excising? but none more urgent than this: what was Trump trying to hide?

A gap like this doesnt happen by accident. Its not a coincidence, said Charlie Sykes, columnist at the Trump-resistant conservative outlet the Bulwark. There is no innocent explanation here somebody made the decision to rip up the record for the crucial hours of January 6 and there has to be a reason why.

What Trump is trying to hide lies at the heart of the House committee investigation into the January 6 insurrection. The former president has consistently tried to block information flowing to the committee pressuring his inner circle not to testify, tearing up documents before they were handed over.

The stakes in the tussle over evidence rose sharply this week when a federal judge said in a ruling that Trump more likely than not dishonestly conspired to obstruct Congress on 6 January. That would be a criminal act.

There has never been any doubt that Trump inspired his supporters to descend on Washington on that fateful day, nor that he encouraged them to protest along the lines of the big lie that the election was stolen from him.

Three weeks before the insurrection he tweeted: Big protest in DC on January 6th. Be there, will be wild!

But Trump is a past master at making outrageous comments while simultaneously disguising or leaving ambiguous his actual intentions. What exactly did he mean by will be wild!? How far was he prepared to take that proposition? Critically, would the missing call logs covering the timeframe of the insurrection offer clues to his motivation?

One call that it is known Trump made within the black hole of those missing hours between 11.17am and 6.54pm was to Pence. Late on 6 January the incumbent president made one final attempt to persuade his deputy to commit an illegal act to delay certification of Bidens win in contravention of his constitutional duties.

According to a leaked account of the call to the New York Times, Trump cajoled Pence with the immortal words: You can either go down in history as a patriot, or you can go down in history as a pussy.

Pence went down in history as a patriot by doing his constitutional duty and certifying the legitimate result. But that phone call marked an important point in the chronology of Trumps coup attempt: it amounted to a point of no return his last move to hang on to power through political persuasion.

Had Trump strayed beyond that point, he would have entered much darker territory. As Sykes put it: When he got off the phone to Mike Pence, who did he call next? Once he knew the vice-president was not going to do his bidding, what next?

David Frum, a former White House speechwriter for George W Bush, writing in the Atlantic, said there were two major lines of inquiry: did Trump give a go-ahead to the Capitol insurrection in advance, and did he coordinate in any way with the attackers.

The January 6 committee has its focus firmly locked on the so-called War Room the gaggle of Trumps close aides that gathered at the Willard hotel in Washington as the command centre of Trumps efforts to subvert the election. They included his former strategist Steve Bannon, his lawyer Rudy Giuliani and John Eastman, the conservative law professor who prepared a detailed plan of how Trump could hold on to power illegitimately.

As the Guardian has reported, Trump conveyed to the group Pences refusal to go along with the coup plot. But beyond that we remain in the dark.

As a result of the missing logs it is unclear whether the then president remained in touch with the Willard Hotel group as the insurrection unfolded. Nor is it known whether they discussed any further tactics.

The gap in official records could also hamper the committees attempt to ascertain whether there were direct contacts between Trump and January 6 organisers. Ali Alexander, who instigated the Stop the Steal movement and who planned a One Nation Under God rally in the Capitol grounds that was canceled amid the violence, has been a figure of interest to the committee.

Before the insurrection he spoke to Kimberly Guilfoyle, the partner of Trumps son Don Jr. CNN has reported that he also said in videos posted before the attack that he planned to reach out to the far-right groups the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers to request they provide security for his rally.

Both organisations have members who are being prosecuted for criminal acts on January 6. Earlier this month the leader of the Proud Boys, Enrique Tarrio, was arrested on conspiracy and other charges. The founder of the Oath Keepers and 10 other members have been charged with seditious conspiracy.

Alexander testified before the January 6 committee in December. In his opening remarks, he said: I had nothing to do with any violence or lawbreaking that happened on January 6. I had nothing to do with the planning. I had nothing to do with the preparation. And I had nothing to do with the execution.

Those words could easily have come from the mouth of Donald J Trump. The challenge facing the committee, in the absence of the vanishing phone logs, is to establish are they true.

See original here:
What is Trump hiding? The Capitol riot-sized hole in White House call log - The Guardian

Donald Trump said again Saturday he was once named Michigans Man of the Year. The award does not exist – PennLive

Former President Donald Trump reportedly claimed during a campaign rally Saturday in Michigan that he has won the the states Man of the Year award.

It is something Trump has claimed before.

And he even has a story to go with it.

I got up and I said, Theyre stealing your car business, Trump said. And, I was really rebuked. That said that wasnt a very nice thing to say. But, its the truth that I was right. That was a long time ago, Man of the Year in Michigan. Weve been doing this stuff a long time actually.

Heres the thing, though: nobody can find an organization that has such an award or that has ever honored Trump as the states Man of the Year.

Per Business Insider, multiple news organizations have tried to verify the claim since (Trump) started saying it in 2016. None have succeeded.

Business Insider said The Detroit News does keep a Michiganians of the Year, list, but it says that Trump has never been a winner there. The Michigan Chamber of Commerce told Snopes it does not give out such an award, too.

Its an odd claim, especially, because it has repeatedly been debunked and yet the former President continues to roll it out. The Detroit News did its best to get to the bottom of why he would do that in 2019, and while it said no one in Michigan seems to know what he is talking about, it did say Trump was given a framed copy of the Gettysburg Address while attending a 2013 Lincoln Day dinner in the state. And, it speculated that, perhaps somehow Trump may have confused that with the Man of the Year award which does not exist.

Trump spoke Saturday at the rally at the Michigan Stars Sports Center in Washington Township, Michigan where he is backing Matthew DePerno for attorney general and Kristina Karamo for secretary of state.

See original here:
Donald Trump said again Saturday he was once named Michigans Man of the Year. The award does not exist - PennLive

Will Donald Trump beat the rap after all? – New York Daily News

I cannot get very excited about the strength of the Fulton County, Georgia case where Trump in a tape-recorded conversation appears to have pressured Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to find 11,780 votes the margin by which Trump lost the state. There, a special grand jury will not begin its inquiry until May 1. There is a court order authorizing Atlanta District Attorney Fani Willis to proceed with her investigation. Under the order, she will have a year to complete it, although she has said she expects to decide whether to indict Trump no later than the first half of this year. Despite the fact that a Brookings report concluded that Trumps post-election conduct in Georgia had put him at substantial risk of possible state charges, including racketeering, election fraud solicitation, intentional interference with the performance of election duties and conspiracy to commit election fraud, this is not, in my opinion, a strong case for the prosecution because there is a reasonable doubt that Trump acted with criminal intent.

The rest is here:
Will Donald Trump beat the rap after all? - New York Daily News

Colwell: Things would surely be different in Ukraine if Trump were president – South Bend Tribune

Jack Colwell| South Bend Tribune

Donald Trump is right. If he were still president, the situation would be far different in Ukraine.

If Mike Pence had ignored his Hoosier values of truth, justice and the Constitution and cooperated in overturning the election results, Trump could now be president.

There would be no danger of armed conflict between Russia and NATO over Ukraine.

There would be no NATO. Trump contended throughout his first term that NATO was outdated. He belittled and insulted leaders of European nations in the alliance. He was reluctant to support the collective-defense agreement known as Article 5. By now in a second term, he would have pulled out of the alliance and scuttled it.

There would be no suggestion from a President Trump that Vladimir Putin is a butcher and must go after Russia invaded Ukraine. Trump praised the genius of Putin as Russia amassed troops for the invasion. And he wouldnt let a little thing like Russia seeking to dominate its neighbor ruin his bromance with Putin. Hey, he pulled out of Syria and let Russia dominate there.

There would be no long, heroic stand by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. He would have been dead a month ago. Trump holds a grudge. Zelenskyy didnt announce an investigation of Joe Biden before the election, even when Trump held up needed defensive weapons for Ukraine to force it. Fervent Trump supporters like Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene and Madison Cawthorn havent forgotten. They call Zelenskyy a thug and corrupt. Trump, if still president, wouldnt forget and wouldnt coordinate massive arms shipments and sanctions to save Zelenskyy and thwart friend Putin.

There would be no Ukraine. Without the United States and a unified NATO providing the help to stall the invasion, Russia would have smashed into Kyiv and disposed of Zelenskyy, still with a terrible toll in Ukraine civilian deaths but with less delay against an outgunned Ukrainian military left without needed weapons.

Trump, though no longer president, still speaks out, claiming that he really won re-election and demonstrating how he would be responding to Putin if still in the White House.

Trump calls for Putin to do something now, something very important.

It wasnt a call for Putin to halt the massacres in Ukraine. It was a call for Putin to release possible dirt on President Bidens black-sheep son Hunter.

Trump resurrected and embellished a controversial, last-minute 2020 campaign contention that Hunter Biden might have (or might not have) received money through funding of a firm by the wife of Moscows mayor.

She gave him $3.5 million, Trump stated as fact. Why? I would think Putin would know the answer to that. I think he should release it, Trump said. I think we should know that answer.

Putin would of course be believed if he announced, Yes, the Bidens accepted millions in bribes along with that thug Zelenskyy to set up a Nazi government and germ warfare labs in Ukraine.

Well, U.S. intelligence agencies didnt believe Putins claims that troops on Ukraines border werent going to invade. They wouldnt believe he had turned truthful now after a life of lies.

But Trump would believe. He famously declared at a meeting with the Russian leader that he believed the word of Putin over findings of his own intelligence agencies.

If Putin did provide dirt helpful for Trumps election in 2024, it would pretty much cinch that Trump, if president again, would approve Putins conquest of Ukraine and signal no concern over Putins desire to return other countries, Poland, Hungary and the Baltics, to their status in the old Soviet Union.

While investigations continue into what Hunter Biden and Donald Trump Jr. might have done wrong, the possible transgressions of either child of a president, proven or not, shouldnt hinder the efforts to save all those children in Ukraine.

Jack Colwell is a columnist for The Tribune. Write to him in care of The Tribune or by email atjcolwell@comcast.net.

More:
Colwell: Things would surely be different in Ukraine if Trump were president - South Bend Tribune

Jared Kushner and Donald Trump Probably Wont Be Splitting a Milkshake With Two Straws Any Time Soon – Vanity Fair

In the nine months since the House of Representatives formed a select committee to investigate the events surrounding the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, numerous members of Donald Trumps inner circle have refused to cooperate, preferring instead to risk contempt of Congress charges than reveal what is, more than likely, extremely damaging information about the former president. Surprisingly not among them? Jared Kushner, who was apparently more than happy to bring investigators up to speed on what he knows.

NBC News reports that Kushnerhusband of Ivanka, son-in-law of Donald, and former senior White House advisermet virtually with the panel on Thursday for more than six hours, after voluntarily agreeing to speak with the committee. While Trump family members have been known in the past to meet with officials investigating the ex-president only to plead the Fifth hundreds of times, Kushner reportedly saw no reason to stonewall the group. Though the details of what he revealed are not known at this time, Virginia Democratic representative Elaine Luria told MSNBC the former first son-in-law provided the panel with really valuable information. Speaking to NPR, Luria said, I think that the committee really appreciates hearing information directly from people who have relevant facts about January 6, and the fact that Jared Kushner came as a witness is helpful to building the story of our investigation.

Kushner was en route back to Washington from Saudi Arabia while the Capitol was being attacked, but the panel is obviously also interested in the events leading up to the insurrection (for example, Trumps monthslong campaign to convince people a second term had been stolen from him, and attempts to get Mike Pence to block the certification of Joe Bidens win.) According to NBC News, the panel had been expected to inquire about Trumps false claims that he won the election and other information related to the deadly attack on the Capitol, as well as any dealings [Kushner] had with Virginia Ginni Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, in the lead-up to Jan. 6. (Last week, The Washington Post revealed that the committee was in possession of more than two dozen text messages between Thomas and White House chief of staff Mark Meadows re: overturning the election. One of them, from November 13, 2020, seemingly referred to Kushner, with Thomas writing: Just forwarded to yr gmail an email I sent Jared this am. Sidney Powell & improved coordination now will help the cavalry come and Fraud exposed and America saved. Powell, of course, is the unhinged Trump attorney who promotedclaims likethere is a secret server that all the votes go to where they [are] manipulate[d].)

In June, CNN reported that an alleged chilliness had developed between Jared and Ivanka and the 45th president, supposedly, in part, over the couples annoyance that Trump wouldnt stop harping about the 2020 election. Having said that, they apparently had no issue following him to Florida and spending the summer at his club in Bedminster, New Jersey, where their accommodations are separated by mere tens of feet. It should also never, ever be forgotten that the duos go-to move while working in the administration was to literallyflee the sceneany time there was blowback for something extra bad Trump did, in apparent hopes people would forget they were senior advisers to the president. And, to date, they have never publicly declared that Biden won the election fair and square. So no one should be hailing Kushner as some kind of hero or defender of democracy.

Nevertheless, Kushners apparent helpfulness to the committeewhich could change should he be asked to turn over documentsis in stark contrast to numerous other insiders. In November, former senior White House adviser Stephen Bannon was criminally charged for ignoring a subpoena from the panel. In January, the House voted to hold Meadows in criminal contempt, after he initially said he would cooperateand turned over thousands of pages of documentsbefore abruptly changing his mind. And just this week, the panel unanimously voted to hold former Trump advisersDan ScavinoandPeter Navarro in contempt of Congress. According to the committee, it is in talks with Ivanka Trump for her to answer questions, but a final agreement has not been reached. The expectation is that it will take place, as to when I cant tell you right now, I know we are engaging her as a committee, chairman Bennie Thompson said Wednesday. In a letter sent to the former first daughter in January, the committee noted that she was in the Oval Office during a phone call between her father and Mike Pence on the morning of January 6. Thats the phone call the president reportedly told his V.P. he didnt have the courage to block the certification of Bidens win. Rep. Liz Cheney has also said the committee had firsthand testimony that Ivanka asked her father at least twice to stop the riot. (For her part Ivanka tweeted that day the violence must stop, which would have meant more if she hadnt initially addressed the people attacking the Capitol as American patriots.)

Read more from the original source:
Jared Kushner and Donald Trump Probably Wont Be Splitting a Milkshake With Two Straws Any Time Soon - Vanity Fair