Archive for the ‘Donald Trump’ Category

Trump says more than he intended while slamming voting rights bill – MSNBC

Donald Trump appeared on Fox Business this week and was asked about recent developments on Capitol Hill. Predictably, the former president complained that Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is "a disaster," condemned the popular new infrastructure law, and whined that Republicans didn't go far enough to threaten the United States with default before raising the debt ceiling.

But before moving on, Trump also emphasized what he saw as his most pressing concern.

"And we have a bigger problem, because they have a so-called voting rights bill, which is a voting rights for Democrats, because Republicans will never be elected again if that happens, if that passes."

The on-air comments came on the heels of a related written statement from two weeks ago in which he said the Freedom to Vote Act would "make it almost impossible for Republicans to get elected in the future."

To the extent that reality still has any meaning, these claims are demonstrably absurd. Virginia, for example, implemented some important and progressive voter-access reforms in recent years, and Republican candidates nevertheless scored major victories up and down the ballot in last month's elections.

But factual details aside, consider the subtext of Trump's arguments: The more Americans are allowed to participate in their own democracy, the more difficult it is for Republicans to win elections. It's both a recipe for partisan voter-suppression tactics, and a subtle acknowledgment that, from Trump's own perspective, the American mainstream isn't eager to buy what the GOP is selling.

As for the voting rights legislation the former president is eager to derail, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer continues to make new strides, endorsing a plan this week to advance the Freedom to Vote Act by creating an exception to the chamber's filibuster rules. As NBC News reported, the New York Democrat addressed the strategy again last night during a special conference meeting.

Schumer said on the call that the Senate would vote on a revised version of the Build Back Better Act and a potential rules change if Republicans do not drop the filibuster early in the new year.... Changing the filibuster rules would allow a vote on sweeping legislation to expand access to the ballot box and safeguard against election subversion.

Before wrapping up for the calendar year, there was evidence of meaningful momentum among Senate Democrats for protecting voting rights, even if that means creating a carve-out to the institution's existing filibuster rules. Democratic Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona continues to stand in the way of progress, but Schumer is clearly determined to push forward anyway.

Watch this space.

Steve Benen is a producer for "The Rachel Maddow Show," the editor of MaddowBlog and an MSNBC political contributor. He's also the bestselling author of "The Impostors: How Republicans Quit Governing and Seized American Politics."

Link:
Trump says more than he intended while slamming voting rights bill - MSNBC

The walls are closing in on Donald Trump – MSNBC

IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Sen. Alex Padilla: "It's not over yet" after Sen. Manchin says no on Build Back Better05:43

MLK III on King holiday: "No celebration without legislation"05:16

Rep. Cori Bush: It's "not a huge surprise" that Sen. Joe Manchin won't vote for Build Back Better05:50

D.C. Attorney General Files Civil Lawsuit Against Proud Boys, Oath Keepers06:40

Now Playing

The walls are closing in on Donald Trump07:57

UP NEXT

Former Sen. Johnny Isakson dead at age 7600:36

Manchin says he won't vote for Biden's Build Back Better Act01:00

'Fox News Sunday' host Chris Wallace announces departure from show02:33

The Bye Line: Remembering Washington Post Editorial Page Editor Fred Hiatt04:12

Republicans lay the groundwork to subvert the 2024 election06:10

Fmr. U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder discusses the 2022 midterms and the battles over redistricting05:03

Filmmaker and activist Rob Reiner discusses 1/6 investigation03:23

Sen. Chris Murphy on foreign policy and guns04:47

January 6th Committee reveals what we already knew - it wasn't a group of rowdy tourists08:07

White House Principal Deputy Press Secretary on Pandemic, Gun Control and Biden's meeting with Putin10:13

The uncertain future of precedent in the Supreme Court06:52

San Francisco Mayor London Breed on Trump: "He Loves San Francisco, Doesn't He?"09:05

Extremists have taken over the Republican Party08:48

The Bye Line: Just like the 1980s AIDS crisis, COVID is not "overhyped"02:37

Former U.S. Senator Bob Dole dies at age 9809:07

Select Committee vice-chair Rep. Liz Cheney signaled this week Trump could be on the hook for potential criminal liability for obstructing Congress' electoral college vote count as the investigation into the Capitol insurrection closes in on the former president's inner circle.Dec. 19, 2021

Sen. Alex Padilla: "It's not over yet" after Sen. Manchin says no on Build Back Better05:43

MLK III on King holiday: "No celebration without legislation"05:16

Rep. Cori Bush: It's "not a huge surprise" that Sen. Joe Manchin won't vote for Build Back Better05:50

D.C. Attorney General Files Civil Lawsuit Against Proud Boys, Oath Keepers06:40

Now Playing

The walls are closing in on Donald Trump07:57

UP NEXT

Former Sen. Johnny Isakson dead at age 7600:36

Read this article:
The walls are closing in on Donald Trump - MSNBC

What happens if Trump admits it all? Nothing much at this point, that might help him – Salon

Fascism is terrifying. Somost peoplelook away.

Fascism is disorienting: A basic understandingof truth and reality, of what is certain in the universe, is replaced by "malignant normality," a surreal environment. As a democracy slowly succumbs and then quickly collapseswhich appears to bewhat America is experiencing right now everything that was once familiar and comforting is replaced by a new order. Those who follow the fascist movement are subsumed in mass ecstasy. Othersare disoriented as they variously decide to resist, to collaborateor simply to muddle throughin their own day-to-day way.

In a new essay forthe Guardian, philosopherand author Jason Stanley describes such a moment coming into existence in America:

There has been a growing fascist social and political movement in the United States for decades. Like other fascist movements, it is riddled with internal contradictions, but no less of a threat to democracy. Donald Trump is an aspiring autocrat out solely for his own power and material gain. By giving this movement a classically authoritarian leader, Trump shaped and exacerbated it, and his time in politics has normalized it.

Donald Trump has shown others what is possible. But the fascist movement he now leads preceded him, and will outlive him.

America's current democracy crisis and moment of interregnum feels like a state ofcollective cognitive dissonance.

Those outside the Trump-Republican fascist movementare increasingly disoriented and confused. They existbut are not truly alive in the civic, political andsocial sense. This is known as"zombie politics."

Perhapsmost confusedare those who truly believed in the myth of American exceptionalism the idea of the United States as the one "indispensable nation,"a shining city on the hill. The rise of neofascism, for those believers, is a type of narcissistic injury. It is also a shroud, marking the death of deeply ingrained but childish fantasiesabout American democracy, American society and America'sfuture.

RELATED:If America really surrenders to fascism, then what? Painful questions lie ahead

In 1920, W.E.B. Du Bois wrote the following in his book "Darkwater" about the global struggle against white supremacy, "And thenthe Veil. It drops as drops the night on southern seasvast, sudden, unanswering. There is Hate behind it, and Cruelty and Tears."

Given that America's native form of fascism is white supremacy, Du Bois's insights ring with especially painful clarity today.

Most Americans, faced with the terror of fascism, will do nothing. That is not an opinion or a judgment. It is just a fact. They know somethingis wrong almost everything, in fact but do not know what to do about it. They have been captured by inertia.

* * *

How many years of life has the Age of Trumpcost the American people?

We know that the coronavirus plague, made dramatically worse by the Trump regime,will take more than amillion people's lives in America.

It has also stolen millions of hours of life from the American people.

But what have the last five years or socost us in terms of our peace of mind? How do we even quantify such a thing? What has thiscost us existentially? What has already been lost, and what will be lost in the future?

On a personal level, I have concluded that the Age of Trump and this struggle has cost me at least fiveyears of my life. I know this for a fact. In private conversation, othertravelers have shared their number with me:Sometimes it is lower, and sometimeshigher. The cost takes many different forms.

Since last Jan. 6, I have found myself repeatedly singing this part of David Bowie's haunting song "Five Years":

We've got five years, stuck on my eyesFive years, what a surpriseWe've got five years, my brain hurts a lotFive years, that's all we've got

I wonder daily about other Americans and what songs they sing inlamentationfor their country.

I have alsoreflectedon George R. Stewart's essential science fiction novel"Earth Abides," whose narrator sharesmemories of a country that no longer existed after a great plague had spread across the world:

It had been a great thing, in those Old Times, to be an American. You had been deeply conscious of being one of a great nation. It was no mere matter of pride, but also there went with it a profound sense of confidence and security in life, and a comradeship of millions.

There is muchwoe in my contemplation and reflection on America's crisis of democracy, and what appears to be imminent doom. Anyone who is truly paying attention feels the same way.

Those of us who have insisted on warning the American people about the rising fascist tide have often become objects of rage and anger from the verypeople we are trying to help. I understand this logic: Somehow they believe that the horrible thing can be made togo away if those who keep talking about it can besilencedor driven to disappear. Those who feel powerless exercise what they perceive as their only remaining option, which is, in effect, to make the messenger be quiet.

In a recent conversation with historian Ruth Ben-Ghiat on my podcast, she explained this:

They want it to go away. They want the situation to go away. And sometimes they want you to go away. Sometimes they want me to go away. They wanted my book to go away. The more interesting ones are the ones where they just can't handle it, you are irksome to them. They don't want to accept what America is becoming. Some of those are the people writing us those notes.

America's democracy crisis and the fascist darkness are not going away. They are only getting worse. This is a moment when those Americans who care about the country's future need to lean into the fascist darkness and its collective evil with eyes fully open as toprepare themselves for what is to come next.

It has been almost ayear since Donald Trump and his regimeattempted a coup that involved a lethal attack on the U.S. Capitol and a nationwide plotto nullify the results of the 2020 presidential election. In the past year, the world has learned how perilously close American democracy actually came to the abyss.

Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.

It was mostly incompetence, dumb luck, timingand the choices ofa few patriots who refused to cooperate that prevented America frombecoming aPutin-style autocracy, with Trump as de factodictator. Such a revolution would not have occurred without widespread violence. Indeed, in that alternate timeline the U.S.might wellnow be in the midst of a civil war or sustained insurgency.

Here is athought experiment: What would happen if Donald Trump were to nowadmithis crimes against American democracy? Of course he would do so in cowardly fashion, with a wink and a nod. Something like: I am not saying I did anything illegal but what if I did?

Trump would continue by explaining that he did it all for the American people the real Americans! He did it tosave America from Joe Biden and the "socialist Democrats." To save America from "cancel culture" and "political correctness" and "critical race theory". He did it toMake America Great Again!

"I did it for you!" he would tell his believers."I am always fighting for you! We will no longer be victims in our own country! I would do it again for the people who truly love America!"

Donald Trump is rapidly moving towardsuch a moment. He has repeatedly said that the Jan 6. coup attempt wasan act of patriotism and that the "real" insurrectionhappened onNov. 3 when the election was "stolen" from him and his followers, in what was surely among the greatest crimes of history.

Last Saturday, Trump issued this pronouncement from his shadow government headquarters at Mar-a-Lago:

All the Democrats want to do is put people in jail. They are vicious, violent, and Radical Left thugs. They are destroying people's lives, which is the only thing they are good at.

They couldn't get out of Afghanistan without disgracing our Country. The economy and inflation are a disaster. They're letting thugs and murderers into our Country their DA's, AG's, and Dem Law Enforcement are out of control. This is what happens in communist countries and dictatorships, and they don't think they'll be held accountable for rigging the 2020 Presidential Election.

The Jan. 6 Unselect Committee is a coverup for what took place on November 3rd, and the people of our Country won't stand for it.

Trump is reportedly planning "counter-programming" on the anniversary of Jan. 6 to celebrate his Big Lie and further encourage his followers to attack American democracy.

Frank Figliuzzi, a former assistant director at the FBI, said in response thatwhen Trump "sends out something like this it's indicative that he's learned something he didn't know," and that his targeting of Democratic district attorneys suggests that:

Word has gotten to him that something is happening, about to happen to him. He doesn't like where the investigation is going. He's lashing out. It's the possibility that either the state of New York or Manhattan district attorney's office and/or the DOJ is getting closer to him. Some word has gotten back to him that triggered that message.

So what will happen if Trump literally admits to high crimes against American democracy and society?Likely nothing. President Biden and the Department of Justice have shown a deep reluctance to prosecute Trump or his inner circle for their many alleged or apparent crimes. Biden and Attorney General Merrick Garland remain afraid of "politicizing" the DOJ and creating a precedent that a former president can be held criminally responsible for their actions while in office.

In the most likely scenario, Trump and other members of his inner circle could face fines or suspended sentences. PerhapsMarkMeadows (or another ranking Trump sycophant) willbe sacrificed for symbolic reasons and serve a brief prison sentence.Trump will face no significant consequences, and will be free to plothis return to power and his next attempt to bring downAmerican democracy.Trump and his followers will, if anything,be even more energized in their crusade to seize and hold power.

RELATED:Stop calling the GOP fascists "hypocrites": No one cares, and they have no shame

What will the Democrats do? Not much. They will continue to hold hearings. There will be resolutions,investigations, and press conferences. They will scream, rightfully so, about each new set of"revelations" and what they tell usabout the perilous state ofAmerican democracy and the rule of law. The Jan. 6 committee will make referrals to the Justice Department that will result in nothing substantial.Perhapssome Republican collaborators in Congress will be censured or removed from committees, as has already happened with Rep. Paul Gosar and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene.Even if Trump and his cabal admitto high crimes, Democrats will in all probability stillbe unable to craft an effective political message, and will remain riven by factional infighting.

As for the Republicans they will be even more loyal to Donald Trump. His admission andpublic embrace of his criminal actions will becomethe new litmus test for being a "real Republican". The coup plotters will be elevated to even higher status in MAGAworld as "role models" and "heroes." Liz Cheney, Mitt Romney anda few other prominent Republicans will condemn Trump. But they are minority voices, near-pariahs at risk of purge or expulsion for disloyalty.Most Republican elected officials and national figures will remain silent and a large and growing number willconsent enthusiastically when Trump and his allies talk of"extraordinary times" and the need for "extraordinary measures".

Republicans will almost certainly win control of the House and Senate after the 2022 midterms. As promised, they will seek revenge on the Democrats through endless investigations, rolling back legislationand perhaps attempting to impeach Joe Biden.It is increasingly likely that either Donald Trump or his hand-picked successor will take power in 2024.

For the mainstream news media, Trump's hypothetical confession would beone of the largest stories in recent American history. Butsustained and articulate advocacy for democracy in mainstream journalism will still be lacking. Someopinion leaders and other prominent media figures will tell the truth without fear.But the traditions, norms, incentive structureand institutional culture of the mainstream media are simplyinsufficientto effectively confront a bold and unapologetic authoritarian movement led by a former president.

RELATED:Democrats and the dark road ahead: There's hope if we look past 2022 (and maybe 2024 too)

After the initial shock and awe at Trump's confession, the media's focus will begin to fade. Soon itwill move on to the next controversy, and the one after that.

As for the American people, Democratic voters and other liberals and progressives will be mobilized at leastfor awhile. There will be marches and protests and similar events. There may even be punctuated moments of civil unrest. But there will be nonational strike, nor any sustained nationwide protests and other forms of direct action and corporealresistance.

Republicans and "conservatives" will of course deny that Trump admitted to committingcrimes or will simply support him. Any disapproval will be muted and polite, insufficient to turn Republicans and other Trump cultists against him. The Big Liehas becomea masternarrative, capable for Trump's followers ofencompassing almost all possible events.

Public opinion polls have shown that a large number of Americans, across party divides, are simply exhausted by the aftermath of Jan. 6 and they escalating democracy crisis. They just want all thediscord tosubside, and a collective return to some type of "normal." Most Americans are politically disengaged, andwill explain Trump's confession as just another example of the corruption and dysfunction of a fundamentally brokensystem.

Trump's followers especially the right-wing paramilitaries and street thugs will only be emboldened. Political scientists and other researchers have repeatedly shown that Republicans are increasingly willing to endorse violence against their perceived enemies Democrats, "liberals" and "socialists," nonwhite people and Muslims as a legitimate political tactic.

Benito Mussolini supposedly observed that if you pluck a chicken one feather at a time,people don't really notice. America's fascist movement has nearly plucked that bird naked before the world.

Once again, the Republican fascists are telling the American people and the world what they are going to do. There is little subtlety or subterfuge involved.

The American people must peer steady into the fascist darkness and resist every temptation to avert their eyes or run away. Unfortunately, most do not have the courage for such a task. The burden falls on the rest of us.

Excerpt from:
What happens if Trump admits it all? Nothing much at this point, that might help him - Salon

Trump Used ‘Stingrays’ to Hunt Immigrants. Now Biden Is Too. – The Daily Beast

When Milton Marin Caceres-Molina was arrested in New York for false impersonationessentially a charge over lying to a police officer about a name or birthdatehis fingerprints showed that he had been deported to his home country of El Salvador in 2010.

But by the time authorities figured out who Caceres-Molina was, he was already gone.

Federal law enforcement officials tried to locate Caceres-Molina based on selfies he posted to Facebook. But when that effort failed, a U.S. Marshal applied for a warrant to authorize the use of a controversial technology to track down Caceres-Molina. Authorities wanted to use a cellphone tower simulator to locate the mobile phone associated with his Facebook account.

They easily tracked Caceres-Molina down, and he was arrested shortly after.

Donald Trumps Administration pioneered the use of these cellphone tower simulatorsa spy tool colloquially known as a Stingray that tricks mobile phones into connecting with a fake cell tower to identify the phones physical locationto hunt down people accused of low-level immigration offenses. But, according to new court documents obtained by The Daily Beast, Joe Bidens administration is pressing on with the controversial tool.

The cell tower simulators have already raised privacy concerns among civil liberties advocates. Stingrays are, after all, powerful tools in the federal governments hands, and there are a host of problematic uses, critics contend, particularly in the absence of a warrant or in the investigation of low-level offenses.

Cell site simulators are tremendously powerful and invasive surveillance technology, Nathan Freed Wessler, deputy director of the American Civil Liberties Unions speech, privacy, and technology project told The Daily Beast. Its a positive development that DHS is telling judges what theyre doing and getting search warrantsthey did not used to do this.

But, Freed Wessler continued, if these devices are ever to be used under the system of the constitution, they need to be reserved for the most serious investigations with strict oversight and limitations.

The Detroit News reported the first known use of a cell site simulator, used to locate and deport Rudy Carcamo-Carranza, a 23-year-old restaurant worker wanted on illegal reentry charges after he was allegedly involved in a car accident and fled the scene.

In 2019, according to reporting from Univision, immigration officials again used a cell site simulator to locate and deport Valente Palacios Tellez, a Mexican immigrant charged with illegal reentry after he returned to the U.S. following deportation and was arrested following a fight outside a restaurant in New York City.

But little is known about other cases in which immigration officials have used the devices.

In documents obtained by the ACLU through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit in 2017, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) policy asserted that immigration officials could use cell site simulators only in the context of a criminal case.

But whether a given immigration violation is treated as a criminal or civil offense has grown increasingly arbitrary, according to Freed Wessler.

They have said that they do not use these for civil immigration enforcement. The problem is that weve had over the past couple decades an incredible criminalization of immigration law, Freed Wessler said.

While illegal reentry is a crime, federal authorities used to manage the violations through civil immigration enforcement measures. But as immigration has become a more contentious political issue over the past few decades, prosecutors have increasingly opted to charge immigrants with criminal offenses.

During the Obama administration, criminal prosecutions of illegal entry and reentry spiked, rising again under the Trump administrations zero tolerance policy.

In two of the previously known cases involving cell simulators used for immigration enforcement, the suspects attracted attention from federal law enforcement following relatively low-level state level charges.

In the warrant application for Caceres-Molinas phone location, federal law enforcement note that hes wanted in his home country of El Salvador on aggravated homicide charges, although the affidavit in support of a criminal complaint against him makes no mention of the charges.

ICE policy for obtaining cell site simulator warrants, as spelled out in the documents obtained by the ACLU, does not restrict the use of cell site simulators to undocumented immigrants charged with additional, non-immigration related offenses.

If they can go after this guy just based on an arrest warrant for an illegal reentry charge, then theres nothing binding them from doing the same thing against anybody who could be charged with illegal entry or reentry, Freed Wessler said.

Read the original here:
Trump Used 'Stingrays' to Hunt Immigrants. Now Biden Is Too. - The Daily Beast

The Worst Political Predictions of 2021 – POLITICO

As predictions go, you could do worse in forecasting the issues that defined this year than what those two men were focused on: Attempting to overthrow American democracy and struggling to contain the pandemic. 2021 in a nutshell, before it even began.

With the year (blessedly) behind us, its time again for a treasured POLITICO Magazine tradition: a rundown of some of the worst predictions of 2021. Some are cocksure and smug; others have a tragic air of obsessiveness (cough, Mike Lindell, cough); still others were totally fair and reasonable predictions at the time, but the world spun in a different direction than it once seemed. Here, more than two dozen predictions about 2021 that were, well, bad.

Everythings going to be fine in the last few weeks of the Trump administration

Predicted by: Hugh Hewitt, Jan. 6

On the morning of Jan. 6, conservative talk radio host Hugh Hewitt appeared on Megyn Kellys podcast and was asked a question on the minds of seemingly every political observer in America: Joe Bidens going to get certified [as president-elect] today. What does Trump do over the next two weeks before the inauguration? I mean, hes still going to be saying what hes saying about the electoral process, and theres a big rally in D.C. today, but what do you think we can expect?

Hewitt responded by predicting a raft of new pardons before turning to the broader concern about the peaceful transfer of power: I would just say to everybody: It will be fine. Everythings going to be fine, he said as Kelly voiced her agreement.

A few hours later, a violent pro-Trump putsch at the U.S. Capitol disrupted the peaceful transfer of power and dragged the nation to the brink of a constitutional crisis. Everything was not fine.

Predicted by: Scott Adams, July 1, 2020

There are a few reasons you might recognize the name Scott Adams. Perhaps you know him from his repeat appearances on these annual worst predictions lists (e.g. that Trump, Biden and Bernie Sanders would all contract Covid by election day 2020 and one would die). If youre of a certain age, maybe you remember Dilbert, the 90s cartoon icon he created that satirized corporate office culture in the years before Office Space. Or, if youre part of the political cognoscenti in the broader Trump era, you might know him as a self-described expert in the rhetorical dark arts who has spun that ability into a second act as a MAGA-adjacent political commentator with a large online following.

But unlike many prominent voices of that persuasion, he exudes a calm clarity in his thinking as if what he says is the natural outgrowth of a deliberative process which gives his predictions a certain dispassionate confidence, as if they are closer to scientific fact than wishcasting or doomsaying.

For instance, on July 1, 2020, Adams made this prediction about American life in 2021 with Joe Biden in the White House: If Biden is elected, theres a good chance you will be dead within the year. Lest you think he was talking about, say, the potential mismanagement of the pandemic or some natural disaster, Adams clarified what he meant in two further tweets: Republicans will be hunted. Police will stand down.

We are nearly a full year into Bidens presidency. Police have not stood down. In fact, many cities have increased funding for police. Republicans, far from being hunted, have made major electoral gains and stand poised to retake at least one house of Congress next year. There are no killing fields. There has been no purge.

Predicted by: St. Louis Post-Dispatch editorial board, Aug. 3

When Bush staged a sleep-in on the steps of the Capitol to protest the lapse of the pandemic-era eviction ban, her hometown St. Louis Post-Dispatch published an editorial that reads like a pat on the head of the freshman Missouri congresswoman and liberal Squad member.

Bush clearly misunderstands the complicated process required to restore the moratorium, they wrote. As with many progressive ideals, righteous-sounding aspirations never seem to take into account political reality. Bush tweeted a demand that President Joe Biden extend the eviction moratorium and that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer force legislative action. Its as if she believes those three can wave their wands and magically make things better.

Later that same day, Biden announced a new 60-day eviction moratorium prompted by pressure and coverage generated by Bushs TV-ready protest. With her antics, she had changed political reality. Even as the ban ended weeks later after being struck down by the Supreme Court, it came about not through magic, but real-world politics.

Predicted by: President Joe Biden, July 8

Last summer, as U.S. forces withdrew from Afghanistan and the Taliban steadily regained territory throughout the country, Biden held a press conference where he was asked about the historical echoes some veterans of the Vietnam War saw between the fall of Saigon and the Afghanistan pullout. Asked if he saw parallels between the two events, Biden who, by the way, was a U.S. senator when Saigon fell in spring 1975 was insistent.

The Taliban is not the South the North Vietnamese army. Theyre not theyre not remotely comparable in terms of capability, he said. Theres going to be no circumstance where you see people being lifted off the roof of an embassy of the United States from Afghanistan. It is not at all comparable. The likelihood theres going to be the Taliban overrunning everything and owning the whole country is highly unlikely.

Just over one month later, in mid-August, Chinook helicopters airlifted Americans from the U.S. Embassy in Kabul as it evacuated. The Taliban surrounded and retook Kabul; it is now fully in control of the government of Afghanistan.

Predicted by: Chuck Schumer, March 10

Nope. The Covid bill passed, checks went into pockets, shots went into arms and the political benefit for Democrats has been minimal. Politics hasnt changed drastically, and it certainly doesnt seem like the pro-autocracy movement has been put to bed in any way.

Predicted by: Kevin McCarthy, April 28

Ahh, the early days of the Biden administration pre-Afghanistan pullout, pre-Delta wave, pre-vaccine mandate when the presidents poll numbers were strong and Republicans flailed about for an issue, any issue, that could provide a political foothold. Banning Dr. Seuss. No? Going to war against Major League Baseball? No? What about meat? Yes, thats the ticket.

Heres what happened: in late April, after Biden vowed to cut greenhouse gas emissions by half, Fox News and its sister channels went to work promoting the falsehood that Biden was going to effectively ban meat, as PolitiFact extensively documented. Their promotion of that deception led House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy to reflect their outrage back at them: On April 28, he appeared on Hannity and confidently predicted that the Biden administration is gonna control how much meat you can eat. That is, of course, not the case: Biden did not ban meat, nor is he controlling how much animal protein you consume, nor is any plan in motion to do that.

Here, a quick clarification may be useful: Theres a difference between a falsehood and a bad prediction. A falsehood is something presented as fact when it is not. A bad prediction is a forward-looking, if ultimately incorrect, assertion about how the future will play out. What McCarthy said is both.

Predicted by: Mike Lindell, many times

March 26: All the evidence I have everything is going to go before the Supreme Court, and the election of 2020 is going bye-bye. Donald Trump will be back in office in August.

March 30: I said Donald Trump will be in [the White House] in August. And I fully believe that myself: hell be back in.

May 25: Donald Trump will be back in by the end of August.

June 2: These are facts: We have a clear path to pull this election down. [On the Supreme Court,] itll be 9-0 down comes the election, and in August, here comes Donald Trump.

June 5: [On the August prediction] I could be off by a month or so, I dont know.

July 4: By the morning of August 13, itll be the talk of the world, going Hurry up! Lets get this election pulled down. Lets get these communists out, you know, [who] have taken over.

Aug. 21: Its Trump 2021, 100 percent: Trump 2021. This election, when it does get pulled down, there were so many down-ticket [races] affected, maybe the Supreme Court, theyll just do a whole new election.

Sept. 21: I made a promise to this country that with all the evidence I have that we would get it to the Supreme Court. And I predicted they would vote 9-0 to look at the evidence. Originally, I had hoped for August and September. We will have this before the Supreme Court before Thanksgiving. Thats my promise to the people of this country.

Sept. 24: Were giving everything all the evidence I have [to] the Supreme Court. That will be done before Thanksgiving. Thats in stone.

Nov. 7: [The Supreme Court is] going to accept it 9-0. It will require a new election across the board. [Theyll] declare the 2020 vote void and order new elections across the board.

Nov. 17: One week from today, on Nov. 23, the states are suing the U.S. government at the Supreme Court. Its over!

Dec. 17: [On the timeline for his long-promised 9-0 Supreme Court case] It was gonna be today; it switched out til Monday.

Lets be clear: Donald Trump lost the 2020 presidential election. He lost by every possible measure. He lost the national popular vote (which doesnt decide who wins). He lost the Electoral College (which does). He lost the swing states of Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. He lost each of them by margins far too large to even possibly be changed by voter fraud. He and his allies lost 61 state and federal lawsuits related to the election results. His claims of widespread fraud or a stolen election are baseless and themselves fraudulent. He has no rightful claim to the presidency.

And yet, Mike Lindell, the MyPillow CEO-turned conspiracy theorist, continues to predict, despite reality, that the election results will be deemed illegitimate, thrown out, and that somehow, this will make Trump the White Houses rightful occupant. How would this work? Unclear. Even if the election were somehow dismissed, why would Trump be given the office? Also unclear. When will this occur? Perpetually, someday soon.

What Lindell has done repeatedly and confidently predicting Trumps return to office time after time, missed deadline after missed deadline isnt just moving the goalposts; its well, metaphors fail. Its moving the whole damn field. Its changing the sport entirely. Its inventing a new game that only he can win, and then managing to lose said game, repeatedly.

Predicted by: Robert McCartney (among many, many, many others), Jan. 1

On Jan. 1, when Washington Post columnist Robert McCartney published his 11th annual predictions quiz about the year ahead, he gave readers six options from which to correctly select the next governor of Virginia. Who would it be? Could Virginia make history by electing a Black woman, like Democratic state Sen. Jennifer McClellan or former Delegate Jennifer Carroll Foy? Would scandal-plagued Lt. Gov. Justin Fairfax improbably resurrect his career after sexual assault allegations? Perhaps a Republican lawmaker, like former state House Speaker Kirk Cox, or the Trumpy state Sen. Amanda Chase?

No. The next governor, McCartney wrote, would be Terry McAuliffe, as Bidens 2020 victory showed theres still plenty of appetite for an old White guy. In November, of course, McAuliffe lost to someone who wasnt even on the list: Republican Glenn Youngkin.

Predicted by: Karl Rove, Feb. 11

Predicted by: John Kerry, April 27

Predicted by: Anthony Scaramucci, May 15

Apparently, fomenting a violent uprising against the government isnt a deal-breaker. With his grip on the GOP still tight, the partys nomination is certainly Trumps if he wants it. And this month, polls on a potential presidential election between Trump and Biden show a tight race: Biden up by 1 (Wall Street Journal, Dec. 7); Biden up by 3 (Echelon Insights, Dec. 14); Trump up by 3 (Harris, Dec. 6). By all appearances, Trump is certainly capable of running in 2024 and winning.

Predicted by: Sean Duffy, Jan. 2

When, on Jan. 2, Watters World guest host Dan Bongino asked Duffy, a former Real World castmate-turned-Wisconsin GOP congressman-turned-Fox News personality, for his predictions for the year ahead, there was not a moments hesitation: Listen, my crystal ball tells me that youre going to have a continued cognitive decline for Joe Biden. By the end of 2021, Kamala Harris will be the president.

Right now, it is Dec. 24, and while Ill concede that it is possible that the next six days bring some truly Earth-shattering news, Biden is still the president. Has his fastball lost some of its zip as hes aged? Sure. Whose doesnt? But there is nothing to suggest anything in the realm of debilitating cognitive decline. And as 2021 ends, Harris is not only not the president, shes been the subject of much critical coverage that has fanned doubts about whether she could ever really be the president.

Predicted by: Donald Trump, Oct. 22, 2020

You can doubt the strength of the Biden economy, debate whether or not the inflation weve experienced is transitory and question all the various statistics trotted out to prove this or that. But its a simple fact that the economy is not in a depression. Its not even in a recession.

Since Biden took office, the unemployment rate has dropped from 6.3 percent to 4.2 percent; the Dow Jones Industrial Average has grown by roughly 14 percent; the S&P 500 is up roughly 21 percent; Americas gross domestic product grew by 7.8 percent over the first three quarters of 2021, even when adjusted for inflation. If thats a depression, then what would be the appropriate term for the economy at the end of the Trump presidency?

Predicted by: Tom Ricks, June 24

In his tweet, Ricks conceded that it was a reckless prediction, but at the time, maybe it didnt seem too crazy. The economy was improving, the pandemic seemed to be receding.

Two months later, the botched Afghanistan withdrawal began to slash away at Bidens ratings. The political fallout from the debacle punctuated by horrific violence, humanitarian disaster and scores of deaths continues to be an albatross on the Biden administration.

By Labor Day, in FiveThirtyEights average, Bidens approval sat at 46.1 percent; his disapproval was 48.3 percent. It was the end of the first full week of the Biden presidency where his approval was underwater. Its been there ever since.

Predicted by: Nate Silver, Aug. 23

There was a time this summer when it appeared that the recall election against California Gov. Gavin Newsom might actually win polls tightened substantially in early August, sparking the typical apocalyptics from the blue-check Twitterati. Pretty decent chance Newsom gets recalled, FiveThirtyEights Nate Silver tweeted before jumping to explain how this reality revealed the foolishness of Dems strategy of not putting forward a potential Newsom successor on question two on the recall ballot: Democrats could potentially keep the seat if they urged their voters to consolidate behind an alternative Democrat but instead theyre telling them not to vote on the replacement!

Come September, Newsom defeated the recall with 62 percent of the vote. And Dems strategy of not consolidating behind an alternative candidate helped Newsom make the vote an up-or-down choice between him and Republican frontrunner Larry Elder rather than giving Democratic voters a viable option on question two (which mightve sweetened the prospect of voting yes on question one).

Silver might take issue with our call that his odds-making counts as a wrong prediction, but the fact is, Newsom ultimately won handily. And his strategy paid off.

Predicted by: Brett Arends, Jan. 22

Predicted by: Myles Udland, Dec. 16, 2020

Turns out there was a reason to worry about inflation. By October, the year-over-year inflation rate was the highest since 1990. By November, it was the highest since 1982. Between January and this writing, the chatter among economists has evolved: It was something you probably didnt need to be worried about. Then it was transitory. Now, it is maybe not so temporary. Hard to tell.

The issue has badly disrupted the first year of the Biden administration, and has a quality not unlike a beach ball in a swimming pool: Try as you might to wrestle it down, it pops back up to the surface over and over again, stubborn to your every effort.

Predicted by: Jamelle Bouie (among many, many others), July 7

In July, my colleague Maya King reported on a trend in suburban Virginia: Tense school board meetings populated by growing numbers of parents angry about the supposed teaching of critical race theory often used by ideological conservatives as a shorthand for how race and social issues are taught in K-12 public schools, even as Loudoun County school officials insisted that the theory was not actually being taught. Could a School-Board Fight Over Critical Race Theory Help Turn Virginia Red?, the headline read.

No, responded Jamelle Bouie, a New York Times columnist who lives in Virginia. The idea, he continued, was an extremely credulous take on Republican wishcasting. (Worth noting: That wasnt an entirely unreasonable assumption, coming four years after stories asked aloud whether fears about the MS-13 gang would spur Republicans to retake the governors mansion.)

It wasnt. Come November, Republicans won the elections for Virginia governor, lieutenant governor and attorney general, and regained control of the state House. Was the critical race theory backlash the sole reason why? No. But it appears to have played a substantial role in winning Youngkin the election.

By promising at nearly every campaign stop to ban critical race theory Youngkin resurrected Republican race-baiting tactics in a state that once served as the capital of the Confederacy, wrote the Times Lisa Lerer. It was, wrote the Times Trip Gabriel, his best known pledge embodying the anger that drove the grass roots. And, in a tidy answer to the question posed in the headline of Mayas piece, USA Todays Ledyard King and Mabinty Quarshie reported that the issue sparked a movement that help[ed] turn Virginia from blue to red last month.

Predicted by: Dana Perino, Jan. 4; Matt Grossmann, Nov. 9, 2020; et al

Its an understandable assumption: Georgia has been going hard for Republicans for decades, and a reasonable observer might imagine that the GOP would have the edge in the Jan. 5 run-offs. Down-ticket, Republicans in the state performed strongly in the November elections: While Trump lost to Biden by about 0.3 points in the state, David Perdue led Jon Ossoff by 1.8 points on the same ballot. The states other Senate seat had just undergone an inconclusive jungle primary in which nobody received more than one-third of the vote; but in her bid to defeat Democratic candidate Raphael Warnock, incumbent Republican Kelly Loeffler was buoyed by a vast fortune and the reality that the Deep South had elected only one Black man to the U.S. Senate since Reconstruction (Tim Scott in neighboring South Carolina). Plus, without Trump on the ballot, Democratic voters might be less inclined to turn out to vote against him.

Nope. With Black voters coming out in huge numbers for Democrats and Republican turnout depressed after Trumps incessant, and false, claims of election fraud, something surprising happened. Warnock and Ossoff won, and delivered Democrats the narrowest possible majority in the U.S. Senate.

Predicted by: Jason Chaffetz, Jan. 2

This one was a bit of Republican wishcasting. Chaffetz, the former GOP congressman from Utah, predicted on the night of Jan. 2 that Nancy Pelosi whose mastery at vote-counting has kept her atop House Democratic leadership for 20 years now would somehow lack the votes to be elected speaker the following day, despite a Democratic majority.

The result was entirely predictable: Pelosi had the votes. Of the 427 members of the House at the time, 216 supported her a margin comfortable enough that a handful of House Democrats from swing seats were free to vote for someone other than her.

Predicted by: G. Elliott Morris, April 25

In fairness, this was not a bad prediction when it was made: Polls throughout the spring showed overwhelming support for Bidens plan to withdraw from Afghanistan.

But by Bidens Sept. 11 deadline, the chaotic U.S. pullout had destabilized his presidency, calling into question the core claims of competence that had long been Bidens ballast.

Its possible that over the long arc of history, Morris prediction will turn out to be correct. But at this point, the pullout was extraordinarily politically damaging for Bidens presidency.

Predicted by: Ben Weingarten, Dec. 30, 2020

A week out from the Georgia Senate run-offs, Benjamin Weingarten, a contributor to the Federalist, appeared on Fox News The Ingraham Angle and laid bare what would happen if Ossoff and Warnock defeated Perdue and Loeffler, delivering Democrats a 50-50 Senate majority. If the Democrats take these two seats, its a guarantee of socialism in this country because youll have D.C. and Puerto Rico statehood. Youll have mass amnesty. Youll have socialized medicine. Youll have the evisceration of the vote integrity.

Two things:

One: A 50-50 Senate could never be read as a mandate for any policy at the ideological extremes of American politics, including socialism. The very nature of the Senate, where members of the minority party have enormous power to block legislation, makes it exceptionally difficult to enact any major policy change.

Two: Clearly, the man has never met Joe Manchin. D.C. statehood? Opposed to it. Puerto Rican statehood? Non-committal. Socialized medicine? Hardly: The man opposed expanding Medicare to cover dental care. Forget socialism; they cant even pass Build Back Better.

Predicted by: Amy Siskind, Jan. 2

Amid the run-up to Jan. 6 as Republican senators like Missouris Josh Hawley announced that theyd object to the count of electoral votes from certain swing states that Biden carried, as pro-Trump die-hards planned a massive rally with the goal of pressuring Congress to essentially discard the results of a democratic election, and as the Big Lie about the 2020 vote metastasized within the Republican electorate a certain amount of (understandable) anxiety percolated among liberals and moderates on Twitter.

Amy Siskind, who rose to online prominence in the early days of the Trump administration by recording and listing out the norms being broken on a weekly basis, was one of the relatively few major voices on #Resistance Twitter urging calm.

Anyone worried about Jan 6 impacting the election dont be, she tweeted on the night of Jan. 2. Its nothing more than a seditious stunt that will go nowhere. Then, a follow-up: If you live in DC, stay off the streets on Jan 6. Let the DC police take care of the white supremacists like they did in Oregon yesterday. I actually think it will be fun to watch lol.

What ultimately happened on Jan. 6, of course, was a brazen attack on both democratic institutions and the democratic process itself: a mob of pro-Trump extremists assaulted police officers, broke into the U.S. Capitol building, called for the hanging of Vice President Mike Pence (and, broadly, heads on pikes), defiled the office of Speaker Nancy Pelosi (among others), sent staffers and members into hiding for hours, took over the floor of the U.S. Senate, caused law enforcement to draw their weapons and barricade the entrance to the House chamber, led to the use of lethal force against a pro-Trump rioter who attempted to enter the Speakers lobby as members fled, and halted the counting of electoral votes for several hours until armed forces could secure the Capitol complex. Fun to watch lol? Not so much.

Predicted by: David Fegan (among others), Jan. 8

After a half-decade during which @realDonaldTrumps every missive was mainlined into the bloodstream of American politics, it was hard to imagine Twitter without him. Then, two days after the Jan. 6 attack, Twitter permanently blocked him. Suddenly, @realDonaldTrump was no more. And after a couple days, it was not at all hard to imagine Twitter without him. Nearly a year later, Twitters still going strong.

Predicted by: Duncan Ross (among others), Jan. 3

Spoiler alert: Trump remained in office until Biden took the oath on Jan. 20.

Predicted by: Paul Strand, Feb. 17

Many progressives wish he would. But Biden has made no move to expand the court, and his blue-ribbon commission to study the issue did not endorse the idea.

Predicted by: Fortune Magazine, Dec. 2020

Theres a consensus that after 20 years at the helm of the Democratic Party in Congress, Pelosi is nearing the end of her career. That much seems obvious. But there are two big x-factors about her remaining time leading Democrats: when shell step aside, and who her successor will be.

The rest is here:
The Worst Political Predictions of 2021 - POLITICO