Archive for the ‘Donald Trump’ Category

Senate GOP feels another Trump effect: The rise of celeb candidates – POLITICO

Trump winning kind of showed, Hey, anybody can do this, said Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.), a former college football coach elected in 2020. President Trump opened the doors for a lot of people. Hes not a lawyer. He hadnt been in politics before. Hes an outsider. So that influenced my decision.

I started a trend, didnt I? Tuberville quipped.

Missouri's Roy Blunt, the No. 4 Senate GOP leader, took the well-traveled route to the upper chamber spending nearly a decade and a half in the House before moving up, with leadership credentials to boot. But Blunt said he's not surprised that Trump's background has inspired more celebrities to mull runs for office.

The logical response to President Trumps election would be people running who dont have political experience but have wide recognition, said Blunt, who is retiring next year. Two House Republicans are vying in the primary to replace him, but they're currently trailing the state's former governor and sitting attorney general.

Running as a household name certainly has its perks, particularly in a costly statewide race. Besides the obvious name recognition, they can raise money more easily or tap their own personal fortunes to fund their campaigns than their competition while claiming the outsider status often coveted in congressional runs. And with the wide reach of cable talk shows, already well-known candidates can communicate to voters fairly easily without paying for advertisements.

On the other hand, celebrity candidates can be unaccustomed to the intense vetting and media scrutiny that comes with running for office.

I joke that the most expensive walk in Washington is from the House to the Senate, said Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), another onetime House member. Celebrity gives you an instant attention, but it also has a downside. You have to prove that youre more than a celebrity.

Walker, for one, is facing questions about his marital history and academic credentials in the Georgia Senate race. Oz has to battle skepticism about his promotion of scientifically dubious remedies on his show, not to mention his Pennsylvania residency given his years living in New Jersey.

The celebrity doctor has emphasized that he grew up in the Philadelphia region, votes in the state and went to graduate school there. Oz has also defended his medical advice. He told a Senate panel that he has given the products he promotes to his family, but also said he recognized that oftentimes they don't have the scientific muster to present as fact.

Theres also the stark knowledge gap that virtually any candidate who came to Congress through entertainment or sports would confront when it comes to writing legislation. Longtime lawmakers warn that the resulting erosion of policy prowess could lead to further partisanship in a chamber thats already bitterly divided.

These celebrities dont come here with an interest in legislating. They come here with an interest in grandstanding and getting TV clips, because thats what theyve spent their entire career doing, said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), who also began his career in the House after time in the state legislature.

My worry is that as you get more people here who have no experience in cutting a deal, it makes a place thats already pretty dysfunctional even worse," Murphy added.

That shift away from Hill deal-cutting practice could be dramatic in the next Congress: All five of the Senate Republicans who've announced their retirements next year are former House members, with collective decades of bipartisanship under their belts.

And the Senate GOP conference could see several new members with zero legislative experience. In addition to Oz and Walker, author J.D. Vance is mounting his own campaign in Ohio.

A spokesperson for Oz said in a statement that he has "spent his career empowering patients and audiences alike to change their lives for the better and is "an outsider." The spokesperson added that "it's that outside the Beltway, people-first mentality that Dr. Oz champions and will make D.C. more accountable when he becomes the next Senator for Pennsylvania."

Fame outside of politics "gets your foot in the door, that gets eyeballs on you, but you still got to perform, said Rep. Tim Ryan (D-Ohio), the current frontrunner in his party's primary to capture that Buckeye State Senate seat next year.

Trump had that. He obviously was able to convince a large part of the country that he was the real deal, said Ryan, who's spent 18 years in the House. But he warned that "when the lights come on, youve got to be able to perform. People are gonna love you if you're a celebrity, and it's more romanticized. But then they take a good close look at you, and you're gonna pass muster or not.

Democrats have seen celebrity candidates on their side of the aisle, too.

Most recently, there was billionaire Mike Bloomberg, whose bid for president tanked but not before racking up endorsements from Hill Democrats. (Bloomberg also served as New York City mayor.) Perhaps the most famous examples are former Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.), a Saturday Night Live comedian turned political activist, and pro basketball player turned senator, Bill Bradley of New Jersey.

And some Democratic candidates have achieved rock star status just by running repeatedly for higher office; former Rep. Beto ORourke recently launched a campaign for Texas governor after two consecutive unsuccessful bids for the White House and the Senate.

It can be hard to go from a position where people like you and say kind things to you and then when you become a candidate and your words get dissected and it actually matters how youre able to handle that is, I think, important , observed Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). Im not suggesting that a football star or a TV personality cant do that, but I do think that sometimes its just harder for them.

Walker and Ozs candidacies, of course, dont quite mean that celebrity will become a requirement for GOP Senate viability. GOP Reps. Vicky Hartzler and Billy Long are trying to replace Blunt in Missouri, while Rep. Ted Budd (R-N.C.) has Trump's backing in the race to succeed retiring Sen. Richard Burr (R-N.C.). And first-term Republican Sens. Kevin Cramer of North Dakota, Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee and Roger Marshall of Kansas are all former House members.

Despite his own roots in the House, Cramer said hes come to appreciate higher-profile Senate candidates for at least one reason: Being elected to Congress isnt the biggest thing thats ever happened to them. And I think thats sort of nice.

Theres no question that Donald Trump broke the mold, Cramer added. I dont know that hes the new mold, but he certainly broke the old one.

Read more:
Senate GOP feels another Trump effect: The rise of celeb candidates - POLITICO

Trump says more than he intended while slamming voting rights bill – MSNBC

Donald Trump appeared on Fox Business this week and was asked about recent developments on Capitol Hill. Predictably, the former president complained that Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell is "a disaster," condemned the popular new infrastructure law, and whined that Republicans didn't go far enough to threaten the United States with default before raising the debt ceiling.

But before moving on, Trump also emphasized what he saw as his most pressing concern.

"And we have a bigger problem, because they have a so-called voting rights bill, which is a voting rights for Democrats, because Republicans will never be elected again if that happens, if that passes."

The on-air comments came on the heels of a related written statement from two weeks ago in which he said the Freedom to Vote Act would "make it almost impossible for Republicans to get elected in the future."

To the extent that reality still has any meaning, these claims are demonstrably absurd. Virginia, for example, implemented some important and progressive voter-access reforms in recent years, and Republican candidates nevertheless scored major victories up and down the ballot in last month's elections.

But factual details aside, consider the subtext of Trump's arguments: The more Americans are allowed to participate in their own democracy, the more difficult it is for Republicans to win elections. It's both a recipe for partisan voter-suppression tactics, and a subtle acknowledgment that, from Trump's own perspective, the American mainstream isn't eager to buy what the GOP is selling.

As for the voting rights legislation the former president is eager to derail, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer continues to make new strides, endorsing a plan this week to advance the Freedom to Vote Act by creating an exception to the chamber's filibuster rules. As NBC News reported, the New York Democrat addressed the strategy again last night during a special conference meeting.

Schumer said on the call that the Senate would vote on a revised version of the Build Back Better Act and a potential rules change if Republicans do not drop the filibuster early in the new year.... Changing the filibuster rules would allow a vote on sweeping legislation to expand access to the ballot box and safeguard against election subversion.

Before wrapping up for the calendar year, there was evidence of meaningful momentum among Senate Democrats for protecting voting rights, even if that means creating a carve-out to the institution's existing filibuster rules. Democratic Sen. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona continues to stand in the way of progress, but Schumer is clearly determined to push forward anyway.

Watch this space.

Steve Benen is a producer for "The Rachel Maddow Show," the editor of MaddowBlog and an MSNBC political contributor. He's also the bestselling author of "The Impostors: How Republicans Quit Governing and Seized American Politics."

Link:
Trump says more than he intended while slamming voting rights bill - MSNBC

The walls are closing in on Donald Trump – MSNBC

IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

Sen. Alex Padilla: "It's not over yet" after Sen. Manchin says no on Build Back Better05:43

MLK III on King holiday: "No celebration without legislation"05:16

Rep. Cori Bush: It's "not a huge surprise" that Sen. Joe Manchin won't vote for Build Back Better05:50

D.C. Attorney General Files Civil Lawsuit Against Proud Boys, Oath Keepers06:40

Now Playing

The walls are closing in on Donald Trump07:57

UP NEXT

Former Sen. Johnny Isakson dead at age 7600:36

Manchin says he won't vote for Biden's Build Back Better Act01:00

'Fox News Sunday' host Chris Wallace announces departure from show02:33

The Bye Line: Remembering Washington Post Editorial Page Editor Fred Hiatt04:12

Republicans lay the groundwork to subvert the 2024 election06:10

Fmr. U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder discusses the 2022 midterms and the battles over redistricting05:03

Filmmaker and activist Rob Reiner discusses 1/6 investigation03:23

Sen. Chris Murphy on foreign policy and guns04:47

January 6th Committee reveals what we already knew - it wasn't a group of rowdy tourists08:07

White House Principal Deputy Press Secretary on Pandemic, Gun Control and Biden's meeting with Putin10:13

The uncertain future of precedent in the Supreme Court06:52

San Francisco Mayor London Breed on Trump: "He Loves San Francisco, Doesn't He?"09:05

Extremists have taken over the Republican Party08:48

The Bye Line: Just like the 1980s AIDS crisis, COVID is not "overhyped"02:37

Former U.S. Senator Bob Dole dies at age 9809:07

Select Committee vice-chair Rep. Liz Cheney signaled this week Trump could be on the hook for potential criminal liability for obstructing Congress' electoral college vote count as the investigation into the Capitol insurrection closes in on the former president's inner circle.Dec. 19, 2021

Sen. Alex Padilla: "It's not over yet" after Sen. Manchin says no on Build Back Better05:43

MLK III on King holiday: "No celebration without legislation"05:16

Rep. Cori Bush: It's "not a huge surprise" that Sen. Joe Manchin won't vote for Build Back Better05:50

D.C. Attorney General Files Civil Lawsuit Against Proud Boys, Oath Keepers06:40

Now Playing

The walls are closing in on Donald Trump07:57

UP NEXT

Former Sen. Johnny Isakson dead at age 7600:36

Read this article:
The walls are closing in on Donald Trump - MSNBC

What happens if Trump admits it all? Nothing much at this point, that might help him – Salon

Fascism is terrifying. Somost peoplelook away.

Fascism is disorienting: A basic understandingof truth and reality, of what is certain in the universe, is replaced by "malignant normality," a surreal environment. As a democracy slowly succumbs and then quickly collapseswhich appears to bewhat America is experiencing right now everything that was once familiar and comforting is replaced by a new order. Those who follow the fascist movement are subsumed in mass ecstasy. Othersare disoriented as they variously decide to resist, to collaborateor simply to muddle throughin their own day-to-day way.

In a new essay forthe Guardian, philosopherand author Jason Stanley describes such a moment coming into existence in America:

There has been a growing fascist social and political movement in the United States for decades. Like other fascist movements, it is riddled with internal contradictions, but no less of a threat to democracy. Donald Trump is an aspiring autocrat out solely for his own power and material gain. By giving this movement a classically authoritarian leader, Trump shaped and exacerbated it, and his time in politics has normalized it.

Donald Trump has shown others what is possible. But the fascist movement he now leads preceded him, and will outlive him.

America's current democracy crisis and moment of interregnum feels like a state ofcollective cognitive dissonance.

Those outside the Trump-Republican fascist movementare increasingly disoriented and confused. They existbut are not truly alive in the civic, political andsocial sense. This is known as"zombie politics."

Perhapsmost confusedare those who truly believed in the myth of American exceptionalism the idea of the United States as the one "indispensable nation,"a shining city on the hill. The rise of neofascism, for those believers, is a type of narcissistic injury. It is also a shroud, marking the death of deeply ingrained but childish fantasiesabout American democracy, American society and America'sfuture.

RELATED:If America really surrenders to fascism, then what? Painful questions lie ahead

In 1920, W.E.B. Du Bois wrote the following in his book "Darkwater" about the global struggle against white supremacy, "And thenthe Veil. It drops as drops the night on southern seasvast, sudden, unanswering. There is Hate behind it, and Cruelty and Tears."

Given that America's native form of fascism is white supremacy, Du Bois's insights ring with especially painful clarity today.

Most Americans, faced with the terror of fascism, will do nothing. That is not an opinion or a judgment. It is just a fact. They know somethingis wrong almost everything, in fact but do not know what to do about it. They have been captured by inertia.

* * *

How many years of life has the Age of Trumpcost the American people?

We know that the coronavirus plague, made dramatically worse by the Trump regime,will take more than amillion people's lives in America.

It has also stolen millions of hours of life from the American people.

But what have the last five years or socost us in terms of our peace of mind? How do we even quantify such a thing? What has thiscost us existentially? What has already been lost, and what will be lost in the future?

On a personal level, I have concluded that the Age of Trump and this struggle has cost me at least fiveyears of my life. I know this for a fact. In private conversation, othertravelers have shared their number with me:Sometimes it is lower, and sometimeshigher. The cost takes many different forms.

Since last Jan. 6, I have found myself repeatedly singing this part of David Bowie's haunting song "Five Years":

We've got five years, stuck on my eyesFive years, what a surpriseWe've got five years, my brain hurts a lotFive years, that's all we've got

I wonder daily about other Americans and what songs they sing inlamentationfor their country.

I have alsoreflectedon George R. Stewart's essential science fiction novel"Earth Abides," whose narrator sharesmemories of a country that no longer existed after a great plague had spread across the world:

It had been a great thing, in those Old Times, to be an American. You had been deeply conscious of being one of a great nation. It was no mere matter of pride, but also there went with it a profound sense of confidence and security in life, and a comradeship of millions.

There is muchwoe in my contemplation and reflection on America's crisis of democracy, and what appears to be imminent doom. Anyone who is truly paying attention feels the same way.

Those of us who have insisted on warning the American people about the rising fascist tide have often become objects of rage and anger from the verypeople we are trying to help. I understand this logic: Somehow they believe that the horrible thing can be made togo away if those who keep talking about it can besilencedor driven to disappear. Those who feel powerless exercise what they perceive as their only remaining option, which is, in effect, to make the messenger be quiet.

In a recent conversation with historian Ruth Ben-Ghiat on my podcast, she explained this:

They want it to go away. They want the situation to go away. And sometimes they want you to go away. Sometimes they want me to go away. They wanted my book to go away. The more interesting ones are the ones where they just can't handle it, you are irksome to them. They don't want to accept what America is becoming. Some of those are the people writing us those notes.

America's democracy crisis and the fascist darkness are not going away. They are only getting worse. This is a moment when those Americans who care about the country's future need to lean into the fascist darkness and its collective evil with eyes fully open as toprepare themselves for what is to come next.

It has been almost ayear since Donald Trump and his regimeattempted a coup that involved a lethal attack on the U.S. Capitol and a nationwide plotto nullify the results of the 2020 presidential election. In the past year, the world has learned how perilously close American democracy actually came to the abyss.

Want a daily wrap-up of all the news and commentary Salon has to offer? Subscribe to our morning newsletter, Crash Course.

It was mostly incompetence, dumb luck, timingand the choices ofa few patriots who refused to cooperate that prevented America frombecoming aPutin-style autocracy, with Trump as de factodictator. Such a revolution would not have occurred without widespread violence. Indeed, in that alternate timeline the U.S.might wellnow be in the midst of a civil war or sustained insurgency.

Here is athought experiment: What would happen if Donald Trump were to nowadmithis crimes against American democracy? Of course he would do so in cowardly fashion, with a wink and a nod. Something like: I am not saying I did anything illegal but what if I did?

Trump would continue by explaining that he did it all for the American people the real Americans! He did it tosave America from Joe Biden and the "socialist Democrats." To save America from "cancel culture" and "political correctness" and "critical race theory". He did it toMake America Great Again!

"I did it for you!" he would tell his believers."I am always fighting for you! We will no longer be victims in our own country! I would do it again for the people who truly love America!"

Donald Trump is rapidly moving towardsuch a moment. He has repeatedly said that the Jan 6. coup attempt wasan act of patriotism and that the "real" insurrectionhappened onNov. 3 when the election was "stolen" from him and his followers, in what was surely among the greatest crimes of history.

Last Saturday, Trump issued this pronouncement from his shadow government headquarters at Mar-a-Lago:

All the Democrats want to do is put people in jail. They are vicious, violent, and Radical Left thugs. They are destroying people's lives, which is the only thing they are good at.

They couldn't get out of Afghanistan without disgracing our Country. The economy and inflation are a disaster. They're letting thugs and murderers into our Country their DA's, AG's, and Dem Law Enforcement are out of control. This is what happens in communist countries and dictatorships, and they don't think they'll be held accountable for rigging the 2020 Presidential Election.

The Jan. 6 Unselect Committee is a coverup for what took place on November 3rd, and the people of our Country won't stand for it.

Trump is reportedly planning "counter-programming" on the anniversary of Jan. 6 to celebrate his Big Lie and further encourage his followers to attack American democracy.

Frank Figliuzzi, a former assistant director at the FBI, said in response thatwhen Trump "sends out something like this it's indicative that he's learned something he didn't know," and that his targeting of Democratic district attorneys suggests that:

Word has gotten to him that something is happening, about to happen to him. He doesn't like where the investigation is going. He's lashing out. It's the possibility that either the state of New York or Manhattan district attorney's office and/or the DOJ is getting closer to him. Some word has gotten back to him that triggered that message.

So what will happen if Trump literally admits to high crimes against American democracy and society?Likely nothing. President Biden and the Department of Justice have shown a deep reluctance to prosecute Trump or his inner circle for their many alleged or apparent crimes. Biden and Attorney General Merrick Garland remain afraid of "politicizing" the DOJ and creating a precedent that a former president can be held criminally responsible for their actions while in office.

In the most likely scenario, Trump and other members of his inner circle could face fines or suspended sentences. PerhapsMarkMeadows (or another ranking Trump sycophant) willbe sacrificed for symbolic reasons and serve a brief prison sentence.Trump will face no significant consequences, and will be free to plothis return to power and his next attempt to bring downAmerican democracy.Trump and his followers will, if anything,be even more energized in their crusade to seize and hold power.

RELATED:Stop calling the GOP fascists "hypocrites": No one cares, and they have no shame

What will the Democrats do? Not much. They will continue to hold hearings. There will be resolutions,investigations, and press conferences. They will scream, rightfully so, about each new set of"revelations" and what they tell usabout the perilous state ofAmerican democracy and the rule of law. The Jan. 6 committee will make referrals to the Justice Department that will result in nothing substantial.Perhapssome Republican collaborators in Congress will be censured or removed from committees, as has already happened with Rep. Paul Gosar and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene.Even if Trump and his cabal admitto high crimes, Democrats will in all probability stillbe unable to craft an effective political message, and will remain riven by factional infighting.

As for the Republicans they will be even more loyal to Donald Trump. His admission andpublic embrace of his criminal actions will becomethe new litmus test for being a "real Republican". The coup plotters will be elevated to even higher status in MAGAworld as "role models" and "heroes." Liz Cheney, Mitt Romney anda few other prominent Republicans will condemn Trump. But they are minority voices, near-pariahs at risk of purge or expulsion for disloyalty.Most Republican elected officials and national figures will remain silent and a large and growing number willconsent enthusiastically when Trump and his allies talk of"extraordinary times" and the need for "extraordinary measures".

Republicans will almost certainly win control of the House and Senate after the 2022 midterms. As promised, they will seek revenge on the Democrats through endless investigations, rolling back legislationand perhaps attempting to impeach Joe Biden.It is increasingly likely that either Donald Trump or his hand-picked successor will take power in 2024.

For the mainstream news media, Trump's hypothetical confession would beone of the largest stories in recent American history. Butsustained and articulate advocacy for democracy in mainstream journalism will still be lacking. Someopinion leaders and other prominent media figures will tell the truth without fear.But the traditions, norms, incentive structureand institutional culture of the mainstream media are simplyinsufficientto effectively confront a bold and unapologetic authoritarian movement led by a former president.

RELATED:Democrats and the dark road ahead: There's hope if we look past 2022 (and maybe 2024 too)

After the initial shock and awe at Trump's confession, the media's focus will begin to fade. Soon itwill move on to the next controversy, and the one after that.

As for the American people, Democratic voters and other liberals and progressives will be mobilized at leastfor awhile. There will be marches and protests and similar events. There may even be punctuated moments of civil unrest. But there will be nonational strike, nor any sustained nationwide protests and other forms of direct action and corporealresistance.

Republicans and "conservatives" will of course deny that Trump admitted to committingcrimes or will simply support him. Any disapproval will be muted and polite, insufficient to turn Republicans and other Trump cultists against him. The Big Liehas becomea masternarrative, capable for Trump's followers ofencompassing almost all possible events.

Public opinion polls have shown that a large number of Americans, across party divides, are simply exhausted by the aftermath of Jan. 6 and they escalating democracy crisis. They just want all thediscord tosubside, and a collective return to some type of "normal." Most Americans are politically disengaged, andwill explain Trump's confession as just another example of the corruption and dysfunction of a fundamentally brokensystem.

Trump's followers especially the right-wing paramilitaries and street thugs will only be emboldened. Political scientists and other researchers have repeatedly shown that Republicans are increasingly willing to endorse violence against their perceived enemies Democrats, "liberals" and "socialists," nonwhite people and Muslims as a legitimate political tactic.

Benito Mussolini supposedly observed that if you pluck a chicken one feather at a time,people don't really notice. America's fascist movement has nearly plucked that bird naked before the world.

Once again, the Republican fascists are telling the American people and the world what they are going to do. There is little subtlety or subterfuge involved.

The American people must peer steady into the fascist darkness and resist every temptation to avert their eyes or run away. Unfortunately, most do not have the courage for such a task. The burden falls on the rest of us.

Excerpt from:
What happens if Trump admits it all? Nothing much at this point, that might help him - Salon

Trump Used ‘Stingrays’ to Hunt Immigrants. Now Biden Is Too. – The Daily Beast

When Milton Marin Caceres-Molina was arrested in New York for false impersonationessentially a charge over lying to a police officer about a name or birthdatehis fingerprints showed that he had been deported to his home country of El Salvador in 2010.

But by the time authorities figured out who Caceres-Molina was, he was already gone.

Federal law enforcement officials tried to locate Caceres-Molina based on selfies he posted to Facebook. But when that effort failed, a U.S. Marshal applied for a warrant to authorize the use of a controversial technology to track down Caceres-Molina. Authorities wanted to use a cellphone tower simulator to locate the mobile phone associated with his Facebook account.

They easily tracked Caceres-Molina down, and he was arrested shortly after.

Donald Trumps Administration pioneered the use of these cellphone tower simulatorsa spy tool colloquially known as a Stingray that tricks mobile phones into connecting with a fake cell tower to identify the phones physical locationto hunt down people accused of low-level immigration offenses. But, according to new court documents obtained by The Daily Beast, Joe Bidens administration is pressing on with the controversial tool.

The cell tower simulators have already raised privacy concerns among civil liberties advocates. Stingrays are, after all, powerful tools in the federal governments hands, and there are a host of problematic uses, critics contend, particularly in the absence of a warrant or in the investigation of low-level offenses.

Cell site simulators are tremendously powerful and invasive surveillance technology, Nathan Freed Wessler, deputy director of the American Civil Liberties Unions speech, privacy, and technology project told The Daily Beast. Its a positive development that DHS is telling judges what theyre doing and getting search warrantsthey did not used to do this.

But, Freed Wessler continued, if these devices are ever to be used under the system of the constitution, they need to be reserved for the most serious investigations with strict oversight and limitations.

The Detroit News reported the first known use of a cell site simulator, used to locate and deport Rudy Carcamo-Carranza, a 23-year-old restaurant worker wanted on illegal reentry charges after he was allegedly involved in a car accident and fled the scene.

In 2019, according to reporting from Univision, immigration officials again used a cell site simulator to locate and deport Valente Palacios Tellez, a Mexican immigrant charged with illegal reentry after he returned to the U.S. following deportation and was arrested following a fight outside a restaurant in New York City.

But little is known about other cases in which immigration officials have used the devices.

In documents obtained by the ACLU through a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit in 2017, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) policy asserted that immigration officials could use cell site simulators only in the context of a criminal case.

But whether a given immigration violation is treated as a criminal or civil offense has grown increasingly arbitrary, according to Freed Wessler.

They have said that they do not use these for civil immigration enforcement. The problem is that weve had over the past couple decades an incredible criminalization of immigration law, Freed Wessler said.

While illegal reentry is a crime, federal authorities used to manage the violations through civil immigration enforcement measures. But as immigration has become a more contentious political issue over the past few decades, prosecutors have increasingly opted to charge immigrants with criminal offenses.

During the Obama administration, criminal prosecutions of illegal entry and reentry spiked, rising again under the Trump administrations zero tolerance policy.

In two of the previously known cases involving cell simulators used for immigration enforcement, the suspects attracted attention from federal law enforcement following relatively low-level state level charges.

In the warrant application for Caceres-Molinas phone location, federal law enforcement note that hes wanted in his home country of El Salvador on aggravated homicide charges, although the affidavit in support of a criminal complaint against him makes no mention of the charges.

ICE policy for obtaining cell site simulator warrants, as spelled out in the documents obtained by the ACLU, does not restrict the use of cell site simulators to undocumented immigrants charged with additional, non-immigration related offenses.

If they can go after this guy just based on an arrest warrant for an illegal reentry charge, then theres nothing binding them from doing the same thing against anybody who could be charged with illegal entry or reentry, Freed Wessler said.

Read the original here:
Trump Used 'Stingrays' to Hunt Immigrants. Now Biden Is Too. - The Daily Beast