Archive for the ‘Donald Trump’ Category

Ted Cruz is on Donald Trump’s list of potential Supreme Court picks – The Texas Tribune

Sign up for The Brief, our daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.

President Donald Trump on Wednesday named U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, as a potential nominee to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Trump included Cruz among 20 possible picks for the high court if Trump wins a second term in November and a seat later becomes open. The 20 new names come in addition to a group of prospective justices that Trump named during the 2016 campaign and has since drawn from to fill two vacancies on the court.

Cruz's name has come up before as a potential Supreme Court appointee, and he has said he isn't interested. In a statement released moments after Trump's announcement, Cruz was noncommittal and seemed to suggest he was satisfied with serving in the Senate.

"It's humbling and an immense honor to be considered for the Supreme Court," Cruz said. "In the Senate, I have been blessed to lead the fight to preserve our constitutional liberties every day, to defend the rights of 29 million Texans and I look forward to continuing to do so for many years to come.

Trump also added a second Texan, James Ho, to his list of potential Supreme Court picks. Ho is a judge on the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and former Texas solicitor general.

Since Trump locked down the GOP nomination in 2016, Cruz has occasionally fielded questions about the possibility of serving on the Supreme Court, given his background in constitutional law. He usually denies interest and says he is more interested in shaping the court as a U.S. senator and politician.

Four years ago, Trump's commitment to naming the justices he could appoint to the court was one of the reasons that Cruz endorsed him after their bitter primary battle.

Ho, who succeeded Cruz as Texas solicitor general, has earned a reputation as one of Trump's most hard-line picks for the federal appellate courts.

Ho has been pivotal in inching the 5th Circuit, already one of the country's most conservative federal appellate courts, further right. He wrote that the Second Amendment has been treated as a "'second-class' right."

In his very first writing for the court, Ho panned campaign donation limits, writing, "if there is too much money in politics, it's because there's too much government." He suggested a long-serving federal judge had shown bias in allowing a subpoena of a religious group in a lawsuit over the handling fetal remains, decrying "the moral tragedy of abortion." In March 2019, he misgendered a transgender plaintiff.

Another 5th Circuit judge with Texas ties, Kyle Duncan, is also on the list. Duncan, who is from Louisiana, is a former assistant Texas solicitor general.

Emma Platoff contributed reporting.

Visit link:
Ted Cruz is on Donald Trump's list of potential Supreme Court picks - The Texas Tribune

Why drugmakers are telling Donald Trump to cool his heels – The Economist

Nine pharmaceutical giants pledge to uphold scientific and ethical standards rather than rush a coronavirus vaccine

Sep 12th 2020

THE WORLDS 7.5bn people want a vaccine for covid-19 as soon as possible. One person needs it by November 3rd. As President Donald Trump limps towards election day, he wants to report real medical progress against the disease. Earlier this year it seemed possible that one or two pharmaceutical firms might be able to obtain some sort of limited approval by the time Americans cast their ballots. That may still be possible. It is certainly desirable, given the pandemics toll on lives and livelihoods. But on September 8th, in an unprecedented move, nine global drugmakers, including AstraZeneca, GSK, Pfizer and Sanofi, announced a pledge to uphold scientific and ethical standards in the search for a coronavirus vaccine.

The message is intended to reassure the public that the companies will not bow to mounting political pressure from the White House to rush through a vaccine without the proper safety and efficacy tests. But it is also a rebuke to the president, who has been politicising the drug-approval processand eroding public confidence in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This could undermine trust in any vaccine that arrives, as sooner or later one almost certainly will.

Mr Trump has already successfully harried the FDA to authorise drugs, such as hydroxychloroquine, with no scientific evidence for their efficacy. He has accused the regulator (unfairly) of being part of a deep state effort to try to slow down vaccine development until after the election. It looked like part of a strategy to get the regulator to hurry up.

Big pharma is clearly worried. Drug firms stand to lose a great deal if their products are seen as being waved through prematurely. The industry relies on the FDA to make business possible. In the same way that people fly because they trust the aviation regulator, they take medicines because these are believed to be safe and effective. Take away the trust and the medicines makers would suffer.

So would investment in research. Pharmaceutical firms have little incentive to develop better drugs if they can simply claim a new product is superior without having to prove it. When Mr Trump came into office, some in his entourage lobbied him to install as head of the FDA someone with a more relaxed approach to efficacy standards. Doctors and patients immediately raised the alarm. But so did drugmakers, who pushed for a more serious candidate to assume the position.

The industry statement makes it clear that vaccine development will move at the pace of science, not politics. More evidence of this came the same day, when AstraZeneca halted clinical trials around the world after one participant showed an adverse reaction. This may slow down vaccine development. But it is also par for the course. Indeed, AstraZenecas decision shows that the system is working. Not so much deep state as deep science.

Editors note: Some of our covid-19 coverage is free for readers of The Economist Today, our daily newsletter. For more stories and our pandemic tracker, see our hub

This article appeared in the Business section of the print edition under the headline "Strong medicine"

See the original post here:
Why drugmakers are telling Donald Trump to cool his heels - The Economist

FiercePharmaPoliticsTrump unveils favored-nation drug pricing executive order, and pharma hits back – FiercePharma

Welcome to theFiercePharmapolitical roundup, where each Monday well highlight developments in Washington, D.C., and elsewherethat could affect drug pricing and howdrugmakersoperate.

After toutinga series ofexecutive orders on drug pricing in late July, President Donald Trump has now unveiledthe most significant among theman order tying Medicare's drug prices to much lower costs in other developedcountries. Thebiopharmaindustry pushed back hard, and its unclear exactly when or how the changes would be implemented.

Theexecutive order, released Sunday, saysMedicare should not buycertainPart B or Part D drugs unless at prices paid byat a minimum, the lowest price atwhich the manufacturer sells that drug to any other developed nation.In Part D, the plan would apply where insufficient competition exists and where seniors are faced with prices" higher thanthose in other developed nations.

ESMO Post Show: Highlights from the Virtual Conference

Cancer experts and pharma execs will break down the headline-making data from ESMO, sharing their insights and analysis around the conferences most closely watched studies. This discussion will examine how groundbreaking research unveiled over the weekend will change clinical practice and prime drugs for key new indications, and panelists will fill you in on the need-to-know takeaways from oncologys hottest fields. Register today.

Under the order,HHS secretary Alex Azaristo begin developing payment plans and working throughtherulemakingprocess.Experts said the order wont be immediately implementable.

Sundaysorder does not by itself do anything, Kaiser Family Foundationexecutive vice president of health policyLarry Levittwroteon Twitter. It has to be followed up by regulations, which will take time.

Trump has a history of bold talk on drug prices, only to pull back when it comes to putting actual regulations in place, he said.

But by expanding the order toinclude drugs in MedicarePart D, the policy would apply much more broadly than any policy change we've seen so far from the administration, and is an exciting new development, drug pricing expert Rachel Sachswroteon Twitter.

RELATED:Trump's drug pricing executive orders won't bring real change: experts

The biopharma industry responded swiftly, with both major trade groups calling the order reckless.BIO threatened legal action.

PhRMA is committed to working through drug pricing issues with the government, CEO Stephen Ubl said in a statement.Butthe administration has doubled down on a reckless attack on the very companies working around the clock to beat COVID-19," he said.

The order isan irresponsible and unworkable policy that will give foreign governments a say in how America provides access to treatments and cures for seniors and people struggling with devastating diseases, Ubl said.

BIO CEOMichelle McMurry-Heathechoed the sentiment. Amid the pandemic,its simply dumbfounding that the Trump administration would move forward with its threat to import foreign price controls and the inevitable delays to innovation that will follow, she said.

This reckless scheme will eliminate hope for vulnerable seniors and other patients waiting for new treatments by drastically reducing investment in cutting-edge scientific research and development, she added. That is why we will use every tool availableincluding legal action if necessaryto fight this risky foreign price control scheme.

RELATED:Pharma execs, upset by Trump's drug pricing executive orders, refuse White House meeting

The order follows a series of others unveiled in late July that center on creating discountsfor insulin and epinephrine, eliminating rebates andallowing drug imports. The Trump administration said it gave the pharma industry time to negotiate on the favored-nations clause, but those talks didnt yield an acceptable alternative, White House deputy press secretary said, asquotedby CNN.

See the original post:
FiercePharmaPoliticsTrump unveils favored-nation drug pricing executive order, and pharma hits back - FiercePharma

Jimmy Kimmel Sounds Off on Don Jr.’s Attempts to ‘Cancel’ Him – The Daily Beast

After blissfully escaping Los Angeles to go on a long road trip with his family this summer, Jimmy Kimmel is officially back to the grind in a city that is full of smoke from the surrounding wildfires. Everything tastes like a barbecue without the food, he jokes.

When I ask the late-night host if he had trouble disconnecting from the news while he was away, he says, I mean at first it was hard and then it was not hard. I feel like its either non-stop or stop. But it was nice to be able to get off the treadmill for a minute.

This coming Sunday, Kimmel will get back on the treadmill to host an entirely virtual Emmy Awards. While he will deliver his monologue and other bits from an empty stage at the Staples Center, all of the presenters and nominees will appear from their homes.

Kimmel explains that hes been honing the unique skill of telling jokes without any expectation of laughter starting with his early days as a radio DJ in Phoenix, Arizona. He perfected it during his monologues from home starting back in March when the coronavirus pandemic shut down production at Jimmy Kimmel Live! and every other late-night talk show.

After three months of quarantine shows, Kimmel revealed his plans to take the entire summer off, with a series of guest-hosts filling in for him until he ultimately returns to his theater the Monday after the Emmys. The announcement came amidst the George Floyd protests and a reckoning in the media that prompted Jimmy Fallon to apologize on his show for previously wearing blackface to portray Chris Rock on Saturday Night Live.

The next night, Kimmel delivered an emotional monologue about acknowledging his white privilege, but it wasnt until after he went off the air for the summer that he decided to issue a public apology for his own unfortunate appearances in blackface to impersonate NBA player Karl Malone on The Man Show.

As the increasingly outspoken comedian tells me during our interview, he wanted to tell the truth about those embarrassing sketches from early in his career. But he also questions the intentions of the Donald Trump Jr.s of the world who claim to be against cancel culture while at the same time doing everything they can to cancel comedians who make fun of them.

Weve now blurred the line between candidates and comedians, he says. They are very different and should be treated differently.

Kimmel also explains why he is one of the few comics still willing to host award shows despite the inevitable backlash, how he maintains hope that Trump will be ousted from office in the fall, and a lot more.

So youre currently preparing to host this entirely virtual Emmys, which is unlike anything weve seen before. Whats the plan, hows it going to work?

I was hoping you were going to tell me. Isnt that why were having this conversation?

Oh yeah, I forgot that was my job.

The plan is Im going to be at the Staples Center essentially by myself. And people are going to be like 40 feet away from me, those who are there. There will be no audience. There will be no one to laugh, which is bad and also good because at least it wont be a surprise if nobody laughs.

Yeah, I was wondering if you had to get used to telling jokes without getting laughs. Because that was the case when you were doing your show from home as well.

I just decided to try to think of it as a radio show with no co-host. And that seems to be what works for me.

Because youve hosted so many of these awards now, does the opportunity to do something really different appeal to you?

No, not at all. I will not lie to you. I would rather be doing this in front of an audience. You know, the fun part of it is getting laughs from people and this is like all of the work and none of the fun.

But you will get to kind of beam into all the nominees homes though, right? Is that how its going to work, where there are actually cameras in everybodys homes for their acceptance speeches?

Yes, everyone will have the cameras positioned in such a way that it doesnt seem like theyre very, very rich. I would imagine well see people in their garages, people Zooming in from their kids rooms and that sort of thing.

What did you think about the recent trend of award shows going without hosts? Because that seems to be where we were headed until this and now it seems like it would be even harder to do a virtual award show without a host.

Honestly, it was kind of funny to me that they positioned it as if it was a conscious decision when the reality is they asked a whole bunch of people and they all said no. And then they made it seem like it was some kind of brilliant programming decision, which it turns out it wasnt. The key is not to cut the host. The key is to make the show shorter. Thats how you do it if you want bigger ratings. But I like a host. I dont like getting in a driverless car and I like to watch an award show with a host.

Youre just old-fashioned that way. But why do you think so many people were saying no to these award shows? You keep saying yes.

Because theres almost no upside to it. It goes one of two ways. Either people go OK, or Oh my God, that was terrible! Lets put a stake through this guys heart. Everything has become so unpleasant. Its a tough thing for most people to navigate.

Do you think that the critics will be any more forgiving for you since youre doing it in such a different way?

You know, I dont worry about the critics. I think the critics write what they believe. Listen, were now split right down the middle. So I know going in, 50 percent of the people are gonna hate me. That wasnt the case 10 years ago.

So the day after the Emmys, youre going back to your theater in L.A. to do Jimmy Kimmel Live! with no audience. I remember you saying at the beginning of the pandemic that you were starting to worry that the networks are going to realize that they dont need to pay for theaters and sets and everything else now that everybody can do this from home. Is that something that youre still worried about at all?

I wouldnt say Im actually worried about it, but I do think that the future is smaller when it comes to television and television shows. And I think that thats just going to be the way it is. Because a lot of it is show business and we dont seem to be as interested in show business anymore now that we have TikTok and Instagram. I guess in a way, if you think about the 40s and 50s, even how people spoke in movies, it became more natural as the years went on. Its kind of like that.

Yeah, its all becoming more similar to our everyday lives when theres not as much of a line between show business and everybody else.

Yeah, when you see so many people behaving naturally, anything other than that feels more artificial I think.

Were headed into these final weeks before the election. Im wondering how youre thinking about that in terms of how youre going to approach what you talk about on the show. Do you feel like thats going to change at all in this final stretch?

Well, there was a lot of Trump over the past three years and I dont see why there would be any less over the next couple of months. I mean, it seems to be all anyone is talking about besides COVID in this election. And I know that theres a lot of anxiety surrounding it. And when theres a lot of anxiety, I think thats when shows like mine have an opportunity to maybe, hopefully lessen that anxiety a little bit by pointing out the humor, pointing out the things that are funny about something that isnt funny at all. So thats a long way of saying, yeah, well be talking about the election a lot.

I know a lot of people who support Donald Trump. I dont know why they do, but I do know people who fall into that category. And I also know that theyre not all a bunch of racist lame-brains.

Were talking the day after Bob Woodwards revelations about Trump deliberately downplaying the pandemic came out. The week before you have the comments about calling the military losers and suckers. After making jokes about him for so long, do you get a sense at this point that any of it will have an impact on the election or change peoples minds?

Oh, I hope so. I have this conversation a lot. And listen, I know a lot of Republicans, I know a lot of people who support Donald Trump. I dont know why they do, but I do know people who fall into that category. And I also know that theyre not all a bunch of racist lame-brains. And I have been heartened to learn that there are a number of people in my life who voted for Trump the first time around who wont do it again. And I think that even if 5 percent of his base feels that wayand boy, I hope we can get more than 5 percent of his base to feel that waythen that is a death knell for him.

It does feel like if anything is going to tip the election towards Joe Biden, its going to be the COVID crisis. And especially now knowing how much Trump misled the American public about itwhich is something we basically knew already, but this is just confirming itand him basically admitting it.

Isnt it crazy that it took this to give Biden the edge? I mean, really, it seems like we should have figured this out the first day when he announced his crowd size was three times bigger than it actually was, when he challenged the veracity of photographs. But thats how divided we are, I guess.

Im curious if you ever find yourself hesitant to make jokes about Joe Biden given the stakes of the election.

No, I do still feel a sense of fairness and if a joke feels true and if I think its going to work, Im going to tell it. Because I am not part of the campaign team, as much as some would like to believe. I think that we have to hold our politicians accountable and find humor in what they do, no matter which side theyre on.

I think that we have to hold our politicians accountable and find humor in what they do, no matter which side theyre on.

Do you have any plans to have either Joe Biden or Kamala Harris on your show and what do you feel like they arent being asked that you would want to ask them?

Yes. I mean, we dont have a date set for any of them, but I think that they know that if it works out for their schedules that wed love to have them on the show. As far as what Id like to ask them, I dont know, I havent really given that a lot of thought. But I am interested in the idea of, how do you approach running against a maniac, running against someone who has no rules? Are you at a disadvantage if you have a sense of decency and behave that way? I always feel like if I was debating Donald Trump, it would devolve into a roast immediately. Id begin insulting him from the first minute until the end of the debate. And it seems to me that it would take a lot of self-control not to.

And hard to know if that would be the most effective approach or not.

Im sure it probably wouldnt, especially for them, but, you know, Im not particularly mature.

So you were off during the conventions, but one thing that really stood out from the Republican convention was how much cancel culture was the huge theme that they decided to focus on. Since then weve seen Trump try to cancel Fox News reporters or companies that he doesnt like. And then theres also the irony of conservatives, like Sean Hannity and others trying to cancel you repeatedly over the years. How do you think about all of that, both from a personal and a political perspective?

Well, I think its unfortunate that that has become something they can grab onto, because I know thats not something that is particular to the right side of the aisle. I think a lot of people feel like this cancel culture goes too far and that theres just no room for apology anymore, that everybody is constantly digging through your trash. And that its not particularly beneficial as far as a functioning society goes. But I do think its unfortunate, because [Trump] is able to grab onto that and to use it as a tool. But most of that has nothing to do with politics. Weve now blurred the line between candidates and comedians and they are very different and should be treated differently. And it does bother me that there are comedians who go into a club that might be fearful about saying something that runs afoul of the political-correctness police. Because you have to be able to say the wrong things to figure out what the right things are and to speak the truth. That kind of self-censorship is dangerous. And I dont think we even know that its happening when it happens. I mean, who wants to go into a comedy club where everyones being careful? Thats not the America I want to live in.

At the same time, obviously at the beginning of your hiatus, you did release a long statement apologizing for these past blackface sketches that you had done a long time ago and explaining your reluctance to address it because of some of these issues. So what went into that decision to issue that long apology?

Well, you used the word blackface, I did not. What went into that decision is just more than anything, just telling the truth, that it is embarrassing to me. And also, I questioned the intentions of most of those who were complaining about it. I know where it was coming from. It was coming from the Donald Trump Jr.s of the world, people who do a tremendous amount of damage to this country in order to elevate themselves and to make themselves famous and to make money. And it just seemed like things were taken out of context and I wanted to put them back into context and move past it.

Another thing that happened during all of the protests and mostly after you went off the air, was that late-night TV got very serious. And I know youve been known to get emotional on your show as well, over some really serious things. Do you ever worry that the humor on these shows is getting lost in any way?

No. I think, you know, were on every night and most nights are jokes. So no, I dont think the humor is getting lost. Im not interested in seeing a guy read a bunch of monologue jokes in a row. I want to know what the person thinks and I want something more. I think it goes back to what we talked about before about show business becoming less showy. I like it when I see [Stephen] Colbert or Seth [Meyers] or any of these guys really talk about something serious. I feel like there are things I learn from it.

For more, listen and subscribe toThe Last Laughpodcast.

See more here:
Jimmy Kimmel Sounds Off on Don Jr.'s Attempts to 'Cancel' Him - The Daily Beast

‘I Moved on Her Very Heavily’: Part 3 – The Atlantic

In her 2019 memoir, What Do We Need Men For?, E. Jean Carroll accused Donald Trump of rape, in a Bergdorfs dressing room in the mid-1990s. After the president denied ever meeting her and dismissed her story as a Democratic plot, she sued him for defamation. Carroll was not, of course, the first woman to say that Trump had sexually harassed or assaulted her, but unlike so many other powerful men, the president has remained unscathed by the #MeToo reckoning. So in the run-up to the November 3 election, Carroll is interviewing other women who alleged that Trump suddenly and without consent moved on them, to cite his locution in the Access Hollywood tape. Im automatically attracted to beautifulI just start kissing them, its like a magnet ... And when youre a star, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab em by the pussy.

Carrolls lawsuit took a dramatic turn this week, when the Justice Department intervened in an attempt to take over the presidents defense, asserting that Trump was acting in his official capacity when he claimed not to know Carroll. Meanwhile, a White House spokesperson denied all of the womens allegations, calling them decades-old false statements that had been thoroughly litigated in the last election and rejected by the American people. Read Part 1 and Part 2 here.

Midsummer twilight, and Jessica Leeds and I are letting down whats left of our hair. Jessica confesses that one time she interviews with a computer company, and afterward she hears that all everybody is talking about is whether or not she was wearing a bra. (She was.) Then I confess that one time I buy a ticket to Johannesburg and a coxcomb from the South African consulate makes me sit on his lap before he agrees to give me a visa. What else do we confess? Well, let me just say that if you have never Zoomed with a silver-haired, soign 78-year-old woman who describes what it is like being strapped in a seat on a Braniff flight with a future president of the United States trying to fasten his lips on her like a 6-foot-3 suckfish, well, in my opinion, reader, you have not lived, let alone Zoomed, at all.

But before we board that Braniff flight, we must first deal with another matter. Again and again we see Jessica, one of the first women to publicly accuse Trump of sexual assault in 2016, on the front page of The New York Times or sitting for an interview with Anderson Cooperand what do we see?

I know that if the story gets any attention, the first thing Trump will say is that Im not pretty enough, Jessica says. I know instinctively thats what hes going to say.

I snort like the empress of Blandings Castle.

Trump, in fact, yammers about Jessicas accusations at a rally, and hoots, Believe me, she would not be my first choice!

How did Jessica know? Because Jessica is an old bat. Old bats are the best. I am an old bat myself. We old bats dont kid ourselves.

I want to tell everyone, Jessica says. In my 30s, Im not bad looking. I certainly never compete in any beauty contest, but I am pretty enough. Thank you.

So for the honor of Jessica Leeds and old bats everywhere, here is a photo of Jessica taken around the time that Im going to tell you about. (Not that she isnt a handsome woman still, dont ya know.)

It is 1979, 1980. Jessica is sailing across the sky, heading back to New York from Dallas. If she has caught a Braniff flightand as Jessica remembers, it probably is Braniffher plane will be painted Perseus green or mercury blue, her seat will be full-grain leather, her flight attendant will be clad in Halston, and Jessica will find a complimentary mini-pack of cigarettes on her tray with her free drinks. This is before she becomes a stockbroker, and she is earning $17,000 a year as a salesperson for a company that supplies newsprint to publications like The Washington Post. Her firm is headquartered in Greenwich, Connecticut, in the old Cond Nast building. Its very posh, Jessica says. And we are posh.

Do you remember what youre wearing on the flight, Jessica?

I have my best suit, Jessica says. A brown tweed. I have a blouse that is a satiny fabric, shiny, and paisley print. Oh, I love that suit! And my hair is dark, dark brown. I think I look terrific.

What color is the blouse?

Silvery, with brown and red. Its a fabulous outfit. It really is. I hang on to it for quite a while, but

She lowers her head and looks at me with her splendid dark-hazel eyes. I never wear it again.

So you get on the plane

I get on the plane and go to the back and take my seat. And I remember watching the stewardess walking down the aisle, and she says to me, Would you like to come up to first class?

In the 1970s, 1980s, it is impossible to surprise a woman: It never occurs to me not to say yesit had happened to me before, Jessica tells me.

Me too, I say. You too, reader?

I accept the fact, says Jessica, flashing a sarcastic look from under her brows, that Im entertainment for the big honchos up in first class.

Ahh, Jessica, I say. People may not understand what were talking about.

What we are talking about is how things used to be: about buying a ticket, putting on our best clothes, and boarding a cocktail party heading for New York or Chicago or Miami or any jazzy city, U.S.A. The party lacks zip unless somebody very rich or very pretty is present. Because to fly 1,500 miles without a beautiful woman next to you is like sitting in a restaurant without being served an entre.

Men in first class will size up the female passengers before boarding and hold a brief conference with the check-in crew. Or, alternatively, a helpful flight attendant on a jumbo jet to L.A. will simply stand in the aisle next to me waving people away and rearranging the seating chart so that an extremely tall chap with hair like greased felt can have the spot by me. And, after the plane takes off, following the meal, the chap can show me a photo of his private plane and then show me a photo of his Rolls-Royce, and then show me his erection.

Trump may have asked the flight attendant to go and fetch you, I say.

It could be, Jessica says.

So you come walking up to first class

I recall he introduces himself. The name means nothing to me.

It wouldnt. Not in 1979 or 1980. Jessica is from Missouri. Her father is a cattle buyer for Oscar Mayer. Her mother, who divorces her dad when Jessica is little, is the executive secretary for the Springfield city manager, and, Jessica says, she runs the town. Jessica grows very tall, very quickly, towering over everybody in school, and, until she flunks fifth grade, nobody knows she cant see the blackboard or the words in her books. Her older brother has been reading everything to her, and Jessica has been memorizing what he reads to her, going to school, and faking it. The day she puts on her new glasses and walks to school and sees the leaves on the trees: The whole world opens up. It is amazing! Amazing! She wins a partial scholarship (tuition and books) to Northwestern University, majors in speech and drama, and, finding herself out of money, finishes up at Southwest Missouri State. She gets a job with an early computer-programming company, then moves on to the paper company. She lives in Connecticut, and though she is flying in and out of New York airports, Jessica is not aware of the levels, the ranks, the spheres of New York society that Trump, a young rat out of Queens, is chewing his way through.

I introduce myself, Jessica says, and he is perfectly reasonable when I first sit down. Hes blond, tallyou know, a good-size manbut I dont remember being overwhelmed by his looks. Then we take off, and they serve a wonderful meal with real linen and real food. And you know? It is delightful. Really delightful. What do we talk about? We talk about him. He doesnt ask me any personal questions. I know very few men who ever ask personal questions. They dont want to know the answers. And I have my book. And he has nothing to read, and when they come and pick up the trays and everything, within a short amount of timeall of a suddenhe is on me.

Does he try to kiss you first?

Yes. Yes Yeah. She glances away from the screen with a revolted wince.

Does he say anything?

He didnt say a word. He was too busy trying to kiss me.

Does he move the armrest between you?

I dont remember. All I remember is all of a sudden, he is on me.

Jessica is ladylike. Therefore, allow mefor I also have experience with Trumpto say in plain English what I believe Trump is about to do. I believe he will go straight for the crotch, this calumny Don who tells Anderson Cooper three times in 2016s second presidential debate that he has never kissed or groped a woman without consent.

Its like hes got four extra hands, Jessica says. Hes grabbing my breasts. Hes trying to kiss me. Im trying to get his hands off me. And this strugglethe very data on the Zoom screen seems to shiver as Jessica recalls the sceneits when he starts putting his hand up my skirt that I get a jolt of strength and manage to wiggle out of the seat. I grab my purse and storm to the back of the plane.

Lets cut to the transcript:

E. Jean: Now wait. Trump puts his hand on your leg and slides it up your skirt?

Jessica: Exactly.

E. Jean: Does he make it all the way up to your panties?

Jessica: No, no.

E. Jean: Because by this time you are starting to stand up?

Jessica: Right. I am on the aisle, so I have an out.

E. Jean: Does anyone offer to help you?

Jessica: The guy across the aisle, his eyes are as big as saucers. I keep thinking, Why dont you say something? [Chuckling.] Thats when I realize it is only me who can rescue me.

E. Jean: Some women freeze in a situation like this. They freeze, or they appease. You certainly dont freeze.

Jessica: No. But I certainly dont say anything.

E. Jean: Did you laugh? [Im picturing Jessica fighting the big orangutan in a small cage.]

Jessica: I dont recall laughing, no. I take it seriously. This is a real, physical attack. I can recall men propositioning me and laughing, but not with someone as physical as Trump.

E. Jean: Lets try to figure this out, Jessica. The question before us is: Why does Trump do this? Hes gotta know hes not going to have intercourse with you right there on the plane, right? What does Trump think hes going to gain? Do your manifold charms cause him to lose control of himself?

Jessica: I think he is bored. Nothing is happening, you know, so lets grab a little pussy.

And there you have it.

Although regretting that she had not planted my fist right into the man-on-the-planes noseI think I really couldve broken it, Jessica moves on. Something happens a year or two later that brings back the plane and parks it forever in the hangar of her brain.

The event occurs after Jessica leaves the paper company and just before she aces every question in her Bache & Co. interview by answering as if she is a man, viz: My Boy Scout leaders opinion means more to me than my mothers. She goes on to pass the Series 7: General Securities Representative Qualification Exam and becomes a stockbroker with Bache, which is later bought by Prudential and becomes Prudential-Bache. These are the days when Jessica has a great little apartment in a brownstone on East 83rd, before she runs into fellow broker Buddy Leeds in the 86th Street subway station (reader, she marries him), and is helping out at a gala for the Humane Society of New York. The event is at Saks Fifth Avenue, and she is wearing a Mary McFadden dress in taxi-cab yellow. I mean, Jessica says, I am meeting Geoffrey Beene, I am meeting Bill Blass, and Mary McFadden comes up and says, Thats my dress! It is a fabulous, fabulous evening.

Then Trump and his wife, Ivana, come in. She is very pregnant. He looks at me when I hand him his table assignment. And I look at him and I think, I remember you. And he stands there and stares at me, and he says, I remember you. Youre the cunt from the airplane.

The rest is here:
'I Moved on Her Very Heavily': Part 3 - The Atlantic