Mediaboss Marketing

Rear Admiral Collin Green had a problem. Green, a Navy SEAL and commander of Naval Special Warfare, knew that his community 3,000 active duty SEALs, their families, and the several thousand former and retired SEALs who make up their elite military tribe was locked in a culture war over one notorious SEAL. What could he do about Eddie Gallagher?

Gallagher, a sniper and medic, was accused of stabbing an injured and unarmed ISIS detainee who may have been as young as 14 during a deployment in Mosul, Iraq, in 2017. The case had made headlines internationally, and Gallagher had won prominent support from President Donald Trump and Fox News.

During Gallaghers court martial, witness testimony and evidence made clear that the veteran SEAL, who had eight combat deployments and was the chief of his platoon, had gone to Iraq hoping to get a knife kill. The mainquestion during the military trial was whether Gallaghers stabbing killed the detainee, who was already suffering from internal injuries from a U.S. military rocket attack when he sustained the knife wound.

In July, Gallagher was acquitted of murder, convicted of posing with the ISIS fighters corpse, and sentenced to a reduction in rank and time served. Trump congratulated him on Twitter.

After the verdict, senior Navy officials demanded that Green clean up the SEAL command, which had been getting bad press for the Gallagher case as well as a string of criminal allegations against other deployed SEALs, including murder, drug use, and sexual assault.An entire SEAL platoon was sent home from a deployment in Iraq for heavy drinking.

So Green issued a letter and a directive to all Navy SEALs this summer. We have a problem, he wrote, adding that a portion of SEALs were ethically misaligned. With that, Green took the first step to correcting a problem that had been building for years: He publicly acknowledged it. No admiral before him had had the courage to do so.

The sordid tale of Trumps repeated Twitter interventions on Gallaghers behalf is both an affront to the rule of law and tragically ironic. The firing of Navy Secretary Richard Spencer last month over the SEAL commands efforts to pull Gallaghers Trident pin, the symbol of the SEALs, may be the final chapter in the Free Eddie saga. But the Pentagon, Congress, and the American public arenow catching on to the fact that the Navy SEALs most closely guarded secrets are not theirclandestine missions andclassified gear but the leadership failures and cover-ups that are endemic to their organization.

Over the last 20 years, the SEALs have moved further from accountability as a result of their battlefield exploits, which have been publicized and lionized by three successive presidents.There was no single moment when the community was cast adrift, but rather a steady string of incidents during deployments in Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere. SEAL units, and especially SEAL Team 6, became the war on terrors entire strategy instead of being deployed as an elite unit in rare and specialized cases. Especially in the aftermath of the 2011 SEAL Team 6 mission in which Osama bin Laden was killed, the men who did the killing became the shiny object civilian leaders flashed to distract us from the governments lack of any strategy beyond waging more war and killing more people.

This was not inevitable. At the risk of oversimplifying a dynamic problem affecting a highly skilled force, the SEAL crisis breaks down into three components:leadership failure, an endless war, and the drive by both previous SEAL admirals and retired operators to profit from the SEAL brand, which has become a highly sought-after financial and cultural commodity.

First, there has been agenuine leadership failure in both the officer corps and the senior enlisted ranks, where accountability and justice have steadily eroded since the post-9/11 wars began. In an effort to be liked, respected, and admired, officers commissioned bythe presidentto uphold good order and discipline have abdicated their responsibility to seasoned enlisted operators who have far more tactical experience on the battlefield.

That happened during Gallaghers 2017 deployment to Mosul. SEALs in Gallaghers platoon reported concerns about him, including allegations that he shot unarmed Iraqi civilians, to their platoon commander, Lieutenant Jacob Portier, but the reports went nowhere. Gallagher, who had been Portiers main instructor at Basic Underwater Demolition/SEALs training, frequently berated the lieutenant in front of the platoon, according to a SEAL on the deployment. The SEALs were asking a young officer on his first combat deployment to stand up to his former instructor, who had an outsized reputation as a super SEAL.

Second, Navy SEALs make up a significant proportion of the special operations community fighting the countrys forever wars. The war in Iraq is over and the war in Afghanistan may be nearing its end, at least for U.S. forces, but SEALs are still fighting around the world. Most enlisted SEALs spend their careers exclusively in special operations and rarely experience the military away from their insular world and its self-reinforcing values.

As a result, their killing skills are finely honed, but the historically unprecedented combat exposure of the post-9/11 years has taken physical and emotional tolls that SEAL leaders are just starting to understand. Gallagher was at the center of at least three problematic incidents during his seven previous combat deployments, which, according to a retired SEAL familiar with his record, are now viewed by SEAL leaders as red flags.

One of those incidents involved 2010 deploymenttoAfghanistan during which Gallagher was accused of killinga child.Gallagher shot at a Taliban fighter who was holding a girl in his arms as a human shield, killing both the child and the militant, the San Diego Union-Tribune reported. Gallaghers lawyer, Timothy Parlatore, told the paper that Gallagher felt remorse, adding: He tried to take a head shot; it went low.Gallagher was investigated and cleared of wrongdoingin connection with the shooting, according to the Union-Tribune.

But two SEALs with direct knowledge say that Gallagher continued to revel in the story and retell it, using it to promote his image as a tough, battle-hardened SEAL.One of those SEALs toldThe Intercept that when Gallagher was a BUD/S instructor, another instructor who had served with Gallagher in Afghanistan told a group of trainees about the operation in which the girl was killed.He described a Taliban fighter or other militant who used his small children, including a baby, as human shields in an effort to avoid a U.S. attack. The instructor described two SEAL snipers in his platoon setting up for a shot on a day when the target cradled a very small child against his chest. One of the snipers was a young SEAL, new to the platoon, the instructor said. The new SEAL refused to shoot the target while he held the child. But the second sniper was willing and fired through child to hit the target, killing them both. The instructor derided the young SEAL and told the class, Thank God we had a real Team guy, willing to shoot the child. Gallaghersubsequently confirmed that he had been the shooter, telling his trainees, I got him.

Later, Gallagher told the story again to his new platoon in SEAL Team 7, adding that he shot the very young girl in the skull because you have to break a few eggs to make an omelet, according to a SEAL who heard Gallagher tell the story. In hindsight, each red flag should have been an indication that Gallagher needed to be disciplined or removed from his leadership position in the platoon.

Shortly after Alpha Platoon arrived in Mosul in 2017, it became clear that Gallagher was troubled. Hed wake us up in the middle of the night screaming from night terrors, said the SEAL who served with Gallagher in Iraq. It was well known within the platoon that Gallagher consumed a cocktail of anabolic steroids, painkillers, and uppers during the deployment. Navy investigators later seized steroids and prescription painkiller Tramadol in a search of Gallaghers home, as well as other evidence of drug use.

Gallagher also suffered a traumatic brain injury, or TBI a result of being blown up during another deployment, according to a current SEAL officer familiar with Gallaghers medical status. At his court martial, witnesses and text messages portrayed a grizzled veteran who lusted for combat. When he deployed to Iraq in 2017, he brought along a customized short blade knife made by a former SEAL teammate. And when an opportunity arose a badly injured young ISIS fighter who had been captured by Iraqi government forces Gallagher told his team, Nobody touch him, hes all mine. Two witnesses at his court martial testified they saw Gallagher then stab the captive in the neck at least once(two other witnesses said Gallagher did notstab the militant).

Investigators obtained a text message Gallagher sent a friend after the deployment,with a picture of the dead detainee,thatsaid, Good story behind this. I got him with my hunting knife.

Parlatore called the text an attempt at dark humor, the Associated Press reported.

Finally, the unwinding of the SEALs has been driven by old-fashioned brand loyalty at the expense of the health and stability of the force. That the SEALs are a commodity is evident in a network television show (SEAL Team on CBS), Hollywoods highest-grossing war film (the Clint Eastwood-directed American Sniper), bestselling books of embellished or disputed accounts of operations (Lone Survivor), and even more books about so-called leadership based on SEAL creeds.Gallagher and his wife are currently searching for a ghostwriter to shop a book of their own, according to person familiar with the effort.

The fame and monetary success of a few former SEALs has helped build a public myth about the heroism, sacrifice, and overall greatness of the force, whose members often believe the distorted version of reality with greater fervor than the American public. The result, as one member of the SEAL community told me recently, was that many who want to speak out about corruption inside the SEAL ranks are admonished to keep quiet and protect the brand.

SEAL operators rely on their brothers. Over time, theyve built a culture in which the primary goal is protecting the man standing next to them. Its a culture that elevates loyalty to fellow SEALs over all other concerns, such as the need for justice and accountability when SEALs commit crimes.

Trumps intervention in Gallaghers case interrupted a rare moment when a SEALs peers wanted to mete out discipline for dishonorable acts. When Gallagher was set to retire two weeks ago, Adm. Collin Green saw a chance to restore good order and discipline to his force. He needed to demonstrate that the SEALs were capable of calling one of their own to account.

Although Gallagher was the only member of SEAL Team 7 to be tried and convicted for posing with the dead ISIS fighter,several other SEALsalso posed with the body.Green determined thatthose who held a position of rank orresponsibility, including Gallagher, would go before a review board of senior enlisted SEALs in a Navy justice process similar to a civil trial, and be judged as to whether they deserved to keep their Tridents.If the board deemed their conduct unworthy of the SEAL identity, all would be stripped of their Tridents and removed from Naval Special Warfare. The measure would allow Green to send a message that Gallaghers conduct was beneath the Navy SEALs.

Collin was trying to let the senior enlisted take ownership over Eddie, said the retired Navy SEAL familiar with plans for the review board. All he was doing was following a standard military process until the president stopped him midstream.

Instead of accountability, the elite military unit got the same message from Trump that their leaders had been sending for the last two decades: Youre above the law.

I have reported extensively about SEAL Team 6 and the larger SEAL community for the last five years, and my sources range from senior officers and enlisted men to young seamen just entering the unit. The SEALs include plenty of courageous, honorable officers and operators but that majority (however slim it may be) has been overpowered by a pernicious minority who cling to the code of the SEAL brotherhood. Members of this minority took to a private Facebook group to denounce as traitors the six young SEALs in Gallaghers platoon who reported their chief to SEAL superiors for what they believed were war crimes. The six SEALs, who also testified against Gallagher at his court martial, did so despite being quietly counseled by their own chain of command to back off. They were warned that going up against their Navy SEAL chief would effectively end their careers.

Besides the SEALs who reported Gallagher to their chain of command, and then went further up when they were rebuffed, few involved in the case against Gallagher covered themselves in glory. The Naval Criminal Investigative Service was heavily criticized during the court martial for holding back exculpatory evidence. The lead prosecutor was removed shortly before it began for sending emails containing malware to defense attorneys and others in an effort to track leaks to the press about the case. The prosecution finally fell apart when one of the six SEAL witnesses, Corey Scott, testified that after Gallagher stabbed the prisoner, Scott himself closed a breathing tube that had been inserted in the ISIS fighters chest, killing him.Scott had not previously told prosecutors that hed ended the captives life.

Those who have defended Gallagher have described the Navys transgression in charging and prosecuting him as second-guessing our warfighters, a hollow argument against investigating a case in which an elite Navy SEAL was credibly accused of stabbing an unarmed and dying detainee as an act of dominance. There was no heroism or glory in Gallaghers conduct.

What the president and Gallaghers supporters cant see is they are failing the SEALs they so admire. Domestic violence and suicide within the force have been downplayed or covered up because they challenge the communitys self-image. Some of Gallaghers friends are concerned that he is a suicide risk, the toll of his brain injury compounded by drinking and drugs a self-medicating cocktail familiar to many veteran SEALs.

It is the SEALs themselves, and their families, who continue to bear the cost of Americas endless wars, as they struggle, with no preparation, for the horrors of lifeafteryears of killing.

Correction: December 5, 2019, 3:47 p.m.An earlier version of this story failed to credit the San Diego Union-Tribune for being the first to report Gallaghers killing of a child in Afghanistan in 2010. The story has also been updated to include a statement Gallaghers lawyermade tothe Union-Tribune about the shooting.

Correction: December 7, 2019An earlier version of this story incorrectly stated that Gallaghers attorneys did not dispute that he stabbed a wounded ISIS captive in Iraq in 2017. The story has been updated to reflect that two witnesses testified that Gallagher did not stab the detainee. The story also incorrectly stated that several other members of Gallaghers platoon posed for a trophy photo with the dead fighter and Admiral Collin Green determined that all of them should go before a review board. In fact, although several other SEALs did pose for a photo with the body, it was only Gallagher and others in positions of responsibility who Green decided should face the review board.

Go here to read the rest:
Donald Trump Keeps the Navy SEALs Above the Law - The Intercept

Donald Trump has one big blessing to count this Thanksgiving, despite the scandals ricocheting around his White House. The US economy's almost supernatural resilience is keeping him in the game with the 2020 election looming.

A general rule of US politics is that a strong economy all but guarantees reelection for a first-term President. And while Trump hasn't consistently produced the 4% growth rates he promised, a projected expansion of around 2% for 2019 isn't bad in fact, it's better than most US competitors. But 2020 might be a wild card.

Trump takes a victory lap every time the Dow leaps into new territory, but his approval ratings aren't keeping up the way they should. The CNN poll pegged him at just 42% perilous territory for a President seeking a second term. While the impeachment drama has not seemed to damage his viability, Trump has never enjoyed majority approval, largely because he alienates so many voters with his scorched earth approach.

Dark clouds are also looming. Several US regional Federal Reserve banks predict growth may dip below 1% in the fourth quarter. Experts warn Trump's trade war with China is also a drag meaning he may be tempted by a deal that he can bill as a big win, even if it's fairly modest. And manufacturing, a vital economic driver in Midwestern states that Trump must win, is beginning to hurt.

If the economy stays strong, it can be a launchpad for a narrow Trump election victory. If it dips, he could be in trouble. If there's a recession, he's likely toast.

Go here to see the original:
Donald Trump has one big blessing to count this Thanksgiving - CNN

There is one good thing about President TrumpDonald John TrumpTrump puts Kushner in charge of overseeing border wall construction: report Trump 2020 national spokesperson gives birth to daughter New McCarthy ad praising Trump includes Russian stock footage MORE going into 2020. It is that he is consistent. Consistency in some philosophies connotes reliability. His divisive and inflammatory rhetoric, bullying mockery of others during campaign rallies, combative foreign policy, his rejection of diplomacy, and his demand for unequivocal loyalty have seriously disturbed the political establishment. This is an establishment that, in the minds of Americans on both the right and the left, has become consumed by its own interests.

Despite the disappointment and feelings of grievances, Americans have come to expect a certain level of civility in political life. They expect prevarications and empty promises masked by the warm embrace of civility. Both civility and character have been political standards that Americans have used to judge the body of politics in this country.

These guiding principles have become the critical appropriation and embodiment of traditions that have shaped the character and shared meaning of a people in these United States. Political communication should be grounded in our personal narratives. Citizens do not emerge from a historical vacuum. They arise from particular traditions. As such, some are taught to speak authoritatively yet compassionately, and they take action responsibly with the aim of serving the collective good.

Trump clearly does not abide by these standards. He questions the very legitimacy and agency of tradition and its meaning in the United States. He is a creature unwedded to basic conservative or liberal doctrines and is unconcerned with orthodoxy. From his view and that of his supporters, Washington tradition has not worked, and it is that grievance toward the status quo that has given Trump sustenance today. The peculiarity of this phenomenon is not relegated to just the political right. Similar sentiments are growing on the left and have given rise to Senator Bernie SandersBernie SandersSaagar Enjeti: Bloomberg exposes 'true danger' of 'corporate media' Doctor calls for standardizing mental fitness tests for elected officials Warren: Bloomberg is betting he 'only needs bags and bags of money' to win election MORE, Senator Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth Ann WarrenWhy Democrats are not actually serious about uniting the nation Warren: Bloomberg is betting he 'only needs bags and bags of money' to win election Bloomberg campaign chief: Trump is winning 2020 election right now MORE, and other emerging progressive stars in the Democratic Party such as Representative Alexandria Ocasio Cortez.

Americans have far deeper issues than partisan divides. Though their grievances are disparate, they share one commonality in their dislike for all things closely aligned with the elite media, politicians, and business. This is one of the reasons for the cultish following of the president, who can do no wrong in the eyes of his worshippers. It does not bother them because Trump exposes the disguise of civility, just as Sanders and Warren do. They stick it to the man by castigating political elites.

As for African Americans and members of other racial minority groups, we have fared no better or worse under Trump than we have under previous administrations. We may have felt better under President Obama because of symbolic racial pride, but we agree that many expectations fell short. The economy did well under President Clinton, but we acknowledge the dangerous crime bill and tough law enforcement stances that decimated the black community. The point is simple in that feeling good or having pride in our national leader does not necessarily yield good results.

What Trump says and does, through his rhetoric and behavior, can be brutally honest. While it may wound the vanity of some, he has complete disregard for business as usual. We must ask ourselves if we would rather have a president who does not care about political civility and tells it like it is or a president who is polished and hides the truth. Whatever you think about Trump and his supporters, it appears there is a growing number of Americans on both sides seeking a leader who is a street fighter, someone who will voice their grievances on center stage.

Americans are accustomed to the former civil politician. They smile at you, look you in the eyes, and tell you what you want to hear to make us feel comfortable. Whether we are willing to admit it or not, everything about the status quo before Trump signaled comfort. We were living in a country devoid of disruptive change. The reality was that it was business as usual, but those dynamics have been changing under the leadership of Trump. Despite the disdain some have for him, a similar movement has taken place on the left. The country needed Trump to shake things up.

In the blockbuster hit The Dark Knight, the Joker said to district attorney Harvey Dent, Introduce a little anarchy. Upset the established order, and everything becomes chaos. I am an agent of chaos. And you know the thing about chaos? It is fair! Trump is indeed fair to Americans because his disruption brings a shared level of chaos to the elites on all sides.

Quardricos Driskell is an adjunct professor of legislative politics with the George Washington University Graduate School of Political Management. Shermichael Singleton is a Republican strategist and a political analyst.

Read more here:
Why America needed Donald Trump | TheHill - The Hill

President Donald Trump has tapped his son-in-law, White House senior adviser Jared Kushner, to oversee construction of the ballyhooed border wall the president has promoted since the onset of his presidential campaign, The Washington Post reported.

The move further expands Kushner's already large portfolio, which includes working on a Middle East peace deal, overhauling the legal immigration and criminal justice systems, pushing trade policy, modernizing the federal government and taking a lead role on Trump's 2020 reelection campaign.

The Post reported that Kushner leads biweekly West Wing meetings focused on the wall's progress, officials familiar with the matter said. Kushner is pushing both U.S. Customs and Border Protection and the Army Corps of Engineers to seize hundreds of parcels of private property so that the government has a chance to meet Trump's goal of building 450 miles of wall along the southern border by the end of next year, with aides telling the Post it is paramount to Trump that 400 of those miles be completed by Election Day.

Trump defended his border wall efforts in a Tuesday tweet, saying it's "wrong" to say the new wall is not being built when old barriers are being replaced. Since Trump took office, the vast majority of wall construction has been for replacement border fencing, not a new wall in places where it didn't exist previously.

Trump resorted to pulling funding from the Defense Department after Congress refused to appropriate money for the project. The Pentagon said in September that it would use $3.6 billion in military construction money to build the wall, in addition to previously making $2.5 billions of counter-drug money available.

Trump declared a national emergency at the border in February in a bid to circumvent Congress and fund wall construction. The border wall was one of Trump's earliest campaign promises during the 2016 election. He initially said it would be paid for by Mexico.

Allan Smith is a political reporter for NBC News.

See more here:
Kushner reportedly overseeing construction of Trump's border wall - NBC News

There are two very big lies that President Donald Trump and his sycophants have used, through aggressive, bombastic repetition, to shape the public debate about impeachment, and about Trumps legitimacy more broadly.

The first big lie is that the people elected Trump and that the constitutional provision of impeachment would invalidate their choice. In fact, Trump is president only because a constitutional provision invalidated the choice of the American people. Trump lost the popular vote and might have lost the Electoral College without Russian interference and yet many Democrats and pundits have been bullied into accepting the fiction that he has democratic, and not just constitutional, legitimacy.

The second big lie is that Russia didnt help elect Trump, and that the president has been absolved of collusion. Its true that the report by Robert Mueller, the former special counsel, did not find enough evidence to prove a criminal conspiracy between Trumps campaign and Russian state actors. But the Mueller report found abundant evidence that the campaign sought Russian help, benefited from that help and obstructed the FBI investigation into Russian actions. His investigation resulted in felony convictions for Trumps former campaign chairman, deputy campaign chairman, personal lawyer, first national security adviser and longtime political adviser, among others.

Had public life in America not been completely deformed by blizzards of official lies, right-wing propaganda and the immovable wall of Republican bad faith, the Mueller report would have ended Trumps minoritarian presidency. Instead, something utterly perverse happened. Democrats, deflated by the Mueller reports anticlimactic rollout, decided to move on rather than keep the focus on Trumps world-historic treachery. Republicans, meanwhile, started screaming about a Russia hoax ostensibly perpetrated on their dear leader. Among them was the House minority leader, Kevin McCarthy, who in 2016 was surreptitiously recorded telling his congressional colleagues that he thinks President Vladimir Putin of Russia pays Trump. Swear to God, he said at the time.

This brings us to where we are now. Democrats understand that the Ukraine scandal is an outgrowth of the Russia scandal as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said last month, with Trump, all roads seem to lead to Putin. Yet theyve made the political calculation that reopening the broader story of how Trump has been compromised by Russia is a political loser.

Rather, its Republicans, with their heroic capacity for shamelessness, who want to talk about Russia. Theyve set out to investigate the investigators, trying to make efforts to uncover the truth about Trumps Russia connections, rather than the connections themselves, into a scandal. And now theyre trying to expand their big lie about Russia to cover Ukraine as well. The president, McCarthy said last month, was trying to get to the bottom, just as every American would want to know, why did we have this Russia hoax that actually started within Ukraine.

Because Republicans have been so successful in shrouding the origins of the Russia investigation in a miasma of misinformation, I hope some talented filmmaker makes a movie out of the new book by Glenn Simpson and Peter Fritsch, Crime in Progress: Inside the Steele Dossier and the Fusion GPS Investigation of Donald Trump. Simpson and Fritsch are co-founders of Fusion GPS, the research firm that investigated Trump during the 2016 campaign, first for the conservative Washington Free Beacon, and then for a lawyer for the Hillary Clinton campaign.

It was Fusion GPS that hired British ex-spy Christopher Steele to look into Trumps Russia connections, and it sits at the center of countless pro-Trump conspiracy theories. When Republicans controlled the House, Fritsch told me Monday, The only bank records that were subpoenaed by the House Intelligence Committee were ours.

Crime in Progress is the best procedural yet written about the discovery of Trumps Russia ties. It demolishes a number of right-wing talking points, including the claim that the Steele dossier formed the basis of the FBIs counterintelligence inquiry into Trump. But it also makes plain what many Republicans knew before the 2016 election, even if theyve now pretended to forget it. For years, Trump was financially entangled with organized crime as well as with Kremlin-friendly oligarchs, and by keeping those entanglements secret, he gave Putin leverage over him from the moment he took office.

Write Simpson and Fritsch, In the end, the Mueller probe sidestepped the question that so unnerved Fusion GPS and Christopher Steele in the summer of 2016: Was the president of the United States under the influence of a foreign adversary? Republicans have used all the power at their command to defame people whove asked this question. Perhaps thats because otherwise theyd have to take seriously all the evidence that the answer is yes.

Michelle Goldberg is an Op-Ed columnist for The New York Times.

Follow this link:
Michelle Goldberg: The Republicans' big lies on Trump and Russia - Salt Lake Tribune