Archive for the ‘Donald Trump’ Category

Navy seeks to eject 4, including sailor championed by Trump, from elite SEALs, official says – NBC News

The Navy will review whether a sailor who was convicted of posing with the corpse of an ISIS fighter before President Donald Trump intervened should be allowed to remain in the elite SEAL corps, along with three of his supervising officers, a defense official told NBC News on Tuesday night.

A military jury acquitted Chief Petty Officer Edward Gallagher of murder and war crimes charges in July but convicted him of having posed with the corpse of the captive, a teenage fighter for the Islamic State militant group. He was ordered dropped in rank from chief to petty officer first class.

Trump last week reversed the order, directing Gallagher's restoration as chief petty officer.

Capt. Tamara Lawrence, a spokeswoman for the Navy, told NBC News on Tuesday night: "We have implemented the president's order to restore Chief Gallagher's paygrade."

Let our news meet your inbox. The news and stories that matters, delivered weekday mornings.

Trump's order was widely reported to have created a rift with the Navy, and Tuesday night, the defense official said the service would seek to strip Gallagher and three of his supervising officers of the gold eagle Trident emblem signifying that they are members of one of the Navy's elite Special Warfare Navy Sea, Air and Land units, better known as SEALs.

The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said Rear Adm. Collin P. Green, commander of the Naval Special Warfare Command, would issue an order Wednesday directing that a Trident review board be convened to determine whether to withdraw the emblem from Gallagher and the three other officers Lt. Cmdr. Robert Breisch, Lt. Jacob Portier and Lt. Thomas MacNeil.

Green would make a ruling based on the board's recommendations, which would then go to the Navy's top leadership.

Download the NBC News app for breaking news

Removal of the Trident denotes that a sailor is no longer a SEAL, but it isn't a demotion. Since 2011, 154 sailors have been expelled from the SEALs.

Asked whether Green expected reprisals from the White House, the defense official said Green had the backing of Navy Secretary Richard V. Spencer and of Adm. Mike Gilday, the chief of naval operations.

The three other men all testified at Gallagher's trial.

Breisch, Gallagher's troop commander, wasn't charged. A naval investigation found that he had been informed about the killings of the ISIS detainees and others multiple times but that he told other concerned SEALs to "let it go."

Charges of failing to report alleged war crimes were dropped against Portier after Gallagher was acquitted in August.

MacNeil, one of the SEALs who reported Gallagher, testified at his trial under immunity. He also posed for the photo with the ISIS fighter's corpse and was accused of drinking with enlisted SEALs, which is against regulations.

Earlier this year, Green said "we have a problem" regarding lack of discipline within the SEALS.

Continued here:
Navy seeks to eject 4, including sailor championed by Trump, from elite SEALs, official says - NBC News

Here’s where the unemployment rate stands in the states that will decide Trump’s 2020 fate – CNBC

US President Donald Trump speaks on the United StatesMexicoCanada Agreement (USMCA) trade agreement at Derco Aerospace Inc. plant in Milwaukee, Wisconsin on July 12, 2019.

Mandel Ngan | AFP | Getty Images

In a 2020 election where a handful of swing states will decide whether President Donald Trump gets another term in the White House, the president may need a strong economy to nudge him over the line.

Trump has already used it to make his case for reelection. During early campaign stops, the president has repeatedly pointed to an unemployment rate near its lowest level in 50 years, among other economic indicators that he says show his administration's success.

Economic health varies more at the state level. The latest government data released Tuesday show not all 2020 battleground states have enjoyed the same gains.

CNBC looked at 13 states that are usually considered swing states or have grown more competitive in recent elections. In October, eight had unemployment rates lower than the national mark of 3.6%, while five stood higher.

At the same time, six of the states had unemployment rates that rose from the previous year. The metric fell in six other states, while it was unchanged in Pennsylvania.

Arizona had the highest unemployment rate of the 13 states at 4.8%, followed by Pennsylvania and Ohio at 4.2%. Iowa, New Hampshire, Colorado and Virginia held the lowest marks at 2.6%.

Minnesota saw the biggest increase in the unemployment rate among those states, while Colorado enjoyed the largest decrease.

Three states that narrowly backed Trump in 2016 Pennsylvania, Michigan and Wisconsin delivered enough electoral votes to put the president in the White House. Along with those states Democrat Hillary Clinton lost in 2016, Democrats hope to flip previously pro-Trump Florida and Arizona, among others.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

More here:
Here's where the unemployment rate stands in the states that will decide Trump's 2020 fate - CNBC

Does Khlo Kardashian Support President Donald Trump? They Have An Interesting History Together – Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Kim Kardashian West has a lot of love for President Donald Trump not necessarily because of his politics, but because of his willingness to work with her on criminal justice reform.

Over the past year or so, shes worked with Trump to secure clemency for at least one person and pass the First Step Act, which helps inmates transition back into society. These efforts have largely been documented on Keeping Up with the Kardashians.

In a recent episode, the KKW Beauty star even invited her sister and right-hand, Khlo Kardashian, to join her. But the Good American founder did not seem super thrilled. It appears that Khlo isnt the biggest fan of Trump, and its not really surprising given their history.

In the episode, which aired on Oct. 27, Kardashian West met with the president to talk about a ride-share program with Lyft that helps newly-released inmates get to job interviews.

I work with Cut 50, they write so much amazing policy, she said in the episode (via Us Weekly). Getting people back on their feet is really important to me and Im so proud to be a part of this initiative to make peoples reentry back into society easier.

When she got back home to Calabasas, California, she suggested that Khlo join her next time, to which she retorted, Girl, Ive been when a different president was in office.

Bloop!

Their relationship dates back to at least 2009 when Khlo appeared on Celebrity Apprentice. People reported at the time that Trump had eliminated her from the show because of a DUI she received in 2007.

I hate people who drive under the influence, Trump said while firing Khlo. I know three families who lost children to drunken driving.

Khlo later defended herself in an old blog post, saying, It wasnt because of my work ethic, it wasnt because I was slacking. It was because of my DUI. I dont think I should have been fired for that reason alone. I just wish Mr. Trump would have handled the situation a little differently.

Sources later told The Huffington Post that Trump was looking for any way to get rid of the reality star. Former staffers of the show told the outlet in 2016 that Trump had made many disparaging comments about Khlo behind the scenes, including calling her a piglet.

Another insider claimed that Trump had once asked the staff, What is this? We cant even get the hot one, seemingly referring to Kardashian West.

In July of the same year, Khlo said that she hated the show and only did it because her mother, Kris Jenner, put her up to it.

It is something I would never do I was put in situations I would never be in real life. I went to home school, I dont know how to do a f*cking PowerPoint and this and that, she explained.

Khlo also said, I dont think [Trump] would make a good president.

So, as we said, shes clearly not a fan.

Original post:
Does Khlo Kardashian Support President Donald Trump? They Have An Interesting History Together - Showbiz Cheat Sheet

A Warning by Anonymous review inside the Trump administration – The Guardian

One of the recurring scenes of the Trump era has been the president holding forth in some splenetic rant from the cabinet table flanked by his top officials gazing into the middle distance with frozen smiles or else looking resolutely downwards as if they had made a startling new discovery about their thumbs.

It is a tableau that always invites speculation on what can be going through the minds of these pained accomplices and now we have at least a partial answer. One among them has brought out a book giving voice to those thoughts, but we do not know who.

The book is by Anonymous, described on the cover as a senior Trump administration official, the same one who wrote an unsigned essay in the New York Times in September last year, declaring they were part of the resistance Inside the Trump administration seeking to thwart the craziest impulses. Anonymous is now a year older, wiser and more depressed.

My original thesis in the New York Times was dead wrong. Americans should not expect that his advisers can fix the situation. We cannot. The question is what to do next, Anonymous writes in A Warning, a book- length exposition of life in the bizarre court of King Donald. The bottom line is that things look as appalling and chaotic from inside the administration as they do from the outside.

Anonymous describes a bizarre sense of fraternity among senior officials like bank robbery hostages, lying on the floor at gunpoint, unable to sound the alarm, but aware that everyone else was stricken with the same fear of the unknown.

The author sees himself or herself as part of the steady state (as opposed the deep state of the darker imaginings of Trump loyalists), who joined the administration early on, out of a mix of duty and optimism that the unlikely president would grow into the role. Then when that began to look absurdly unlikely the steady staters stayed on to try to contain and mitigate Trumps whims until they realised they had become glorified government babysitters.

Presenting a fullyfledged policy document would be like speaking Aramaic to Trump through apillow

These officials quietly compare notes and pool their shared shock and despair. According to Anonymous, there was half a plan to stage a mass resignation at one point as a way of raising the alarm about the seriousness of the situation, but the scheme was abandoned as being too destabilising to the country.

Instead, these officials have continued to seep out of the administration in a steady stream of resignations and dismissals. It is not entirely clear whether Anonymous is still on the inside, constantly in fear of discovery. But if I had an anonymous source burrowed deep inside the administration, I would want a lot more colour and anecdote than we are given in A Warning. We do learn that Trump has the insane idea of designating migrants as enemy combatants and sending them to Guantnamo Bay. We also get a little more detail on the relentless dumbing down of presidential briefings. Policy papers were condensed to PowerPoint presentations with a handful of slides, which became three main points, and then finally the advice to newcomers was come in with one main point and repeat it over and over again, couching it in terms of winners and losers, preferably with a really strong graphic.

Anonymous recalls the reaction to a hapless aide who ignored the advice and presented pages of briefing notes. What the fuck is this? Trump shouts. These are just words, a bunch of words. It doesnt mean anything. Presenting a fully fledged policy document, the author observes memorably would be like speaking Aramaic to Trump through a pillow. Even if he tried very hard to pay attention, which he didnt, he wouldnt be able to understand what the hell he was hearing, Anonymous writes. Various unnamed officials are frequently cited saying such things as: This place is so fucked up ... There is literally no one in charge here which frankly has become the archetypal unattributed quote from the Trump era, familiar from a thousand newspaper stories.

Anonymous acknowledges that there is something strange about Trumps obsequious relationship with Vladimir Putin but has no definitive ideas about what lies beneath it, other than a general admiration for dictators who run their countries as he would like to run the US.

The author predicts that there will be a lot more compelling stories to emerge from the administration at a later date, to which any reader would be entitled to ask why they were not informed of that before they bought this book. By way of explanation for its surprising blandness, the author explains early on that too many details could compromise national security or help blow the writers cover.

Speculating about the authors true identity has become something of a niche sport in Washington. The sleuths should perhaps be looking for someone with a classical education. The text is littered with the sayings of Plato, Aristotle and Marcus Aurelius. An extensive middle section is devoted to measuring Trump against Ciceros virtues of leadership an odd, rather pointless exercise, a bit like judging Boris Johnson by the attributes required to be a world class ballerina. There is little surprise that the president scores badly in every department.

The classical stuff is laid on so thick it could be a misdirect, designed to cast suspicion elsewhere. Leak investigators might instead look for an admirer of the late senator John McCain. The author of A Warning was provoked into writing the first cry for help in the New York Times not because of Trumps obvious misogyny or racism, or attachment to Putin, but because of the presidents peevishness on McCains death in August 2018, sulkily ordering flags raised after the first day of mourning and failing to put out a proclamation. The warning in the books title refers to the implications of a second Trump term. The president is already ignoring the law, and the supposedly co-equal authority of Congress, putting loyalists in top position in an acting capacity, so they need not be confirmed by the Senate. Anonymous predicts the republic is likely to unravel at an accelerated rate if Trump wins re-election.

On the world stage, the author observes that the US has been extraordinarily lucky so far not to have undergone a monumental international crisis since Trump took office. We have not suffered a major attack against the United States or been forced to go to war, but its only a matter of time before that luck runs out, Anonymous predicts, asking the reader whether they really want to risk keeping the US nuclear arsenal under Trumps unchallenged stewardship for another four years.

Providing more detail of the moment members of the administration contemplated invoking the 25th amendment, relieving the president of power if a majority of the cabinet and the vice president deem him unable to discharge his duties, Anonymous contends if enough cabinet members had signed such a document, Mike Pence would have put his name on it.

Armoured vehicles would race across town to the US capitol building and a protected courier would walk the document into the hands of congressional leaders, the book suggests. However, the author and the would-be co-conspirators quickly had second thoughts, reasoning that Trump would resist and denounce the move as coup, possibly triggering conflict across the country. Violence would be almost inevitable, Anonymous concludes.

The book is current enough to consider the impeachment proceedings now under way, urging Republicans to follow the law rather than partisan loyalty, before rejecting that option too as an unsatisfactory means of toppling an elected president. Ultimately, Anonymous deems the 2020 election to be the countrys best chance of waking up from its Trumpian nightmare. The author encourages fellow Republicans to look beyond tribalism, and Democrats to put up a centrist candidate that can unite an anti-Trump majority, or muses about a third-party candidate emerging from the heartland.

A Warning ends then with a rousing call to the ballot box, but it fails to answer the question that hangs over almost every page: why heed the counsel, however urgent, of someone who is not prepared to reveal who they are?

A Warning is published by Little, Brown (20). To order a copy go to guardianbookshop.com or call 020-3176 3837. Free UK p&p over 15, online orders only. Phone orders min p&p of 1.99.

View post:
A Warning by Anonymous review inside the Trump administration - The Guardian

The Next Decade Will Be Just as Bad – The New York Times

We will remember the 2010s as a grifters paradise. These were the years when our collective sense of objective reality totally fell apart and when politics, business, technology, culture and even ordinary life fell fully under the sway of a new breed of swindler, huckster, influencer, troll and hacker.

Scams and fakery were not just ascendant this decade they were often the dominant story line. It was a time of life comes at you fast and milkshake duck. The primary feeling of the 2010s was one of punch-drunken disorientation, of always having the rug pulled out from under you. And this was the big lesson of the 2010s: Almost nothing is as it seems. Doubt everything. Trust no one.

Not that this idea works very well: Doubting everything may be a workable plan for individual survival in a fracturing media universe dominated by algorithms and digital media of dubious authenticity, but pervasive doubt could just as well bring on civilizational ruin. Getting through modern life seems to require adopting a corrosive view of society that makes a hash of our fundamental ideas about the value of cooperation and trust among our fellow humans. Were bringing on a death-spiral of distrust and I fear that in the 2020s and beyond, grifters peddling alternative facts may come to suffocate us all.

The most obvious example of the hucksters rise was, of course, Donald Trump. When Trump announced his bid for the presidency in 2015, much of the political and media establishment, including many leading Republicans, thought the idea of a self-dealing, conspiracy theorizing reality TV star winning the White House was a pretty funny joke. Few of them understood Trumps effectiveness at hacking the news landscape to command our attention completely. Few of them could have guessed that rather than the establishment foiling Trump, his slippery style and overwhelming blizzard of lies would so fully alter political and media culture that by the end of the decade, members of the G.O.P. would be embracing and echoing his conspiracy theories as a way to forestall his removal from office.

While conspiracy thinking took full flower on the right, it began to bloom on the left, too. Trumps election was followed by the rise of anti-Trump online influencers who came to dominate news and activism. These were the resistance grifters Michael Avenatti, the brothers Ed and Brian Krassenstein, the nearly self-parodic Louise Mensch who peddled a self-serving brand of breathless anti-Trumpism heavily peppered with calls to buy their books and other merch. A specter of foreign disinformation led to widespread suspicion, and it became a handy defense for grifters to dismiss opposition as bots or Russian shills.

Why are we being overrun by scams? Societys signals for judging reputation and trustworthiness havent caught up with the changing tech. Even though we know better, we reflexively mistake Instagram for reality online influence is seen as a proxy for real-world authenticity, and so we are constantly falling under the sway of people whove found ways to game the digital realm. On your phone, the Fyre Festival looks irresistible.

We are also too easily blinded by wealth, or markers for wealth. Anna Sorokin, the Russian immigrant convicted this year of conning New York society into thinking she was a German heiress named Anna Delvey, defrauded hotels and banks of hundreds of thousands of dollars by pretending to be rich. Shed hand out $100 bills to anyone and everyone. For a stretch of time in New York, no small amount of the cash in circulation was coming from Anna Delvey, Jessica Pressler wrote.

You could argue that my take on the end of truth is too gloomy. Consider the clarifying power of #MeToo how in the cases of Harvey Weinstein, Jeffrey Epstein, Bill Cosby and other once-powerful men, we witnessed the power of facts and objective, clear eyed investigation to alter the brutal power structures that had long held victims in silence.

You might also argue that collectively, were getting better at spotting hucksters and frauds. The resistance grifters had a good run, but we found them out. Less than a year from now, if not sooner, Trump, too, may hit the end of his run.

But Im skeptical that these things signal some reason for optimism. Our information system has slipped its moorings, and as a result, lying and scheming and fraud has simply become too effective a life strategy. As I argued in March, when the celebrity college admissions scandal broke, were seeing the uberization of corruption bending the rules is becoming routine and pervasive, a push-button cheat code for modern life.

Its not a big leap from Trust no one to swindle everyone. Happy new decade, I guess.

Farhad wants to chat with readers on the phone. If youre interested in talking to a New York Times columnist about anything thats on your mind, please fill out this form. Farhad will select a few readers to call.

Originally posted here:
The Next Decade Will Be Just as Bad - The New York Times