Archive for the ‘Donald Trump’ Category

How Steve Bannon and Donald Trump Rode the Honey Badger Into the White House – New York Times

Green reminds us that it wasnt long ago that both men were looked at as political jokes, and not even bad ones. When Ivanka Trump told Rupert Murdoch over lunch that her father intended to run for president, the media baron replied, without even looking up from his soup: Hes not running for president.

As for Bannon, when Green first met him in 2011 he came across as a political grifter seeking to profit from the latest trend. Later, as Bannon took the reins of the Trump campaign, he was seen by Beltway Republicans as an Internet-era update of the Slim Pickens character in Dr. Strangelove who rides the bomb like a rodeo bull, whoopin and hollerin all the way to nuclear annihilation.

But whatever the pair lacked in conventional political experience, they made up for with other gifts. Both understood showmanship: slogans, narrative, put-downs and especially conflict. They knew the value of rage and outrage alike the first as fuel for a movement; the second as the indispensable foil for that movement.

They also grasped that much that was supposed to matter in politics no longer did detailed policy papers, for instance, or personal decorum. Trump, Green writes, figured out that the norms forbidding such behavior were not inviolable rules that carried a harsh penalty but rather sentiments of a nobler, bygone era, gossamer-thin and needlessly adhered to by politicians who lacked his willingness to defy them.

Thats why Trumps birtherism the support he gave to the lie that Barack Obama was born abroad never disqualified his candidacy, even as it helped him forge a powerful connection with party activists. Its a tactic he would repeat straight through the end of the campaign, when he took to denouncing international banks in terms that shaded into anti-Semitism.

Darkness is good, was Bannons advice for dealing with criticism from groups such as the Anti-Defamation League. Dont let up. At another moment, when the campaign feared House Speaker Paul Ryan would try to steal the G.O.P. nomination from Trump, Bannon threatened to rally Breitbarts army. Pepes gonna stomp their ass, he said Pepe the Frog being the alt-rights white-supremacist cartoon mascot on Twitter.

Green is consistently interesting on the subject of Trump. But the real value of Devils Bargain is the story it tells about Bannon, some of which has been previously reported (not least by Green himself) but never so well synthesized or explained as it is here. The product of a working-class family and a Catholic military high school in Richmond, Va., he was taught from an early age that the defining moment in Western civilization occurred in 1492 not with Columbuss discovery of the New World, mind, but with Ferdinand and Isabellas Reconquista from the Moors of the Iberian Peninsula.

The lesson was, heres where Muslims could have taken over the world, recalled one of Bannons classmates. And here was the great stand where they were stopped.

If that was an early hint of Bannons political vision (and now a staple of Trumps foreign policy speeches), other lessons suggested the means he would employ to achieve that vision. On Wall Street in the mid-1980s, he came to admire Michael Milken, the so-called junk bond king, who showed how a band of outsiders could set about laying siege to a comfortable, fattened and vulnerable establishment.

Later, while running an Internet business in Hong Kong, Bannon discovered the underworld of online gamers; intense young men who disappeared for days or even weeks at a time in alternate realities. One of those alternate realities was World of Warcraft, in which millions of people were digitally transformed into secret soldiers waging titanic battles in unseen worlds against mythical enemies.

Bannon seemed to intuit that this digital world could be recreated for his political purposes, by designing an apocalyptic narrative of righteous warriors waging an end-of-days battle by all necessary means against assorted enemies: jihadists, progressives, Acela-corridor Republicans, the Clintons. Republican political operatives had spent the Obama years wondering about the missing white voters who had failed to show up for John McCain and Mitt Romney. Turns out, they (or others like them) were online, and Bannon whose own fantasies were suggested by a portrait he had of himself in his office, dressed as Napoleon was proposing to supply this army with the necessary ammunition.

Much of it would come from the bile factory at Breitbart News. Another part would be supplied by the Government Accountability Institute, a Tallahassee, Fla.-based nonprofit that mined the deep Web and dug up the dirt on the Clinton Foundation for Peter Schweizers 2015 blockbuster Clinton Cash. There was also a data-analytics firm, Cambridge Analytica, an offshoot of a British company that advised foreign governments and militaries on influencing elections and public opinion using the tools of psychological warfare.

What all of this added up to was a kind of alt-G.O.P. agile and indifferent to norms and boundaries that could supply the Trump campaign with everything it needed to win. Bannon has described himself as a Leninist for wanting to destroy the state. Whether he will achieve that is doubtful, but he seems to share Lenins genius for building a secret party with radical designs, ready to pounce at the historically opportune time.

Now it has succeeded. To what end? As an electoral gambit, the honey badger approach was a good bet: Trump is president not in spite of the wretched things he said about Mexicans, women, John McCain, Megyn Kelly and so on, but because he said them. He sold his shamelessness as fearlessness and his charlatanism as charisma, and people believed. Lord save us when Democrats alight on a similar candidate.

As a governing principle, however, honeybadgerism has been less of a success. As an article in Mental Floss noted, honey badgers may be smart, resilient and incredibly tough, but theyre also lazy about housekeeping, mean and skunk-like, meaning they possess an anal gland that releases a suffocating smell when in distress.

Readers can draw their own parallels, but thats usually not a formula for political success. Bannon and his acolytes should beware: Sooner or later, theyll outstay their welcome.

Bret Stephens is an Op-Ed columnist for The Times.

Read the rest here:
How Steve Bannon and Donald Trump Rode the Honey Badger Into the White House - New York Times

A charity renamed an Indian village after Donald Trump. Then things got weird. – Washington Post

The event at the newly named Trump Village in a remote corner of India on Tuesday had all the hallmarks of a major unveiling: a ceremony, school kids singing inspirational songs and phalanx of national and international media in attendance.

There was only one problem: The Indian philanthropist who renamed the village in honor of America's president had no permission to do so and in fact officials asked his charity on multiple occasions to back off, warnings that were ignored.

We repeatedly asked them not to hold this event, but they did not listen," said Mani Ram Sharma, the deputy commissioner of the district where the farming village of about 600 is located. They did not ask for any permission, and none would have been given if they had.

The drama surrounding the renaming of tiny Marora began last month when Bindeshwar Pathak, the founder of water and sanitation charity Sulabh International, announced during a speech in Virginia that he wanted to change the name of a village, where he is building toilets, to honor Trump and improve bilateral relations between the United States and India.

The village elders happy to have the attention, and perhaps the development dollars that came with it gave their permission. Huge Trump Village billboards were erected with a grinning Trumps name and likeness. But Sharma quickly declared the rebranding illegal and ordered police to tear down the signs.

It was all fictitious and a fraud event by the organizers aimed at collecting money across the country and abroad, Sharma said in an earlier interview with the wire service IANS.

Nevertheless, Sulabh went ahead with a ceremony Tuesday to inaugurate a new vocational center and some toilets it had built for the villagers. Children waved (smaller) signs with Trumps photo and the words "Our Trump Village Will Be Clean!" and villagers sand songs praising the virtues of indoor toilet use. Nearly a third of Indians do not have access to proper sanitation.

We are trying for permission [for the name change] but we dont have it until now, said Monika Jain, a vice president of the charity. She said she expected it to be granted in the coming weeks.

Also attending the event was Puneet Ahluwalia, vice chairman of the Fairfax County Republican Committee and a member of Trump's Asian Pacific American Advisory Committee.

The Trump Organization did not respond to an email asking whether this use of the presidents name and likeness was appropriate.

Residents there know little about Trump or his policies but said they were happy to have their village named after him. Why not if it brings these facilities our way? said Mehboobi, one of the women who had received one of the freshly built commodes. Swati Gupta contributed to this report.

Read the original post:
A charity renamed an Indian village after Donald Trump. Then things got weird. - Washington Post

Al Gore: ‘I Was Wrong’ About Donald Trump – HuffPost

Former Vice President Al Goresays hes given up hope that President Donald Trumpwill act on key climate issues.

Gore recounted toLate Show hostStephen Colberthis optimism after his meeting with Trump to discuss climate change and the landmarkParis Accord. Trump hadpromised supporters during the campaign that he would pull out of the agreement, arguing it was a bad deal.

I went to Trump Tower after the election, said Gore, who was on the show to promote his new movie, An Inconvenient Sequel: Truth to Power. I thought that there was a chance he would come to his senses. But I was wrong.

Trump announced the United States withdrawalfrom the agreement last month, a decision widely met with criticism from business leaders, fellow politicians and longtimeU.S. allies. More than 350 mayorsin cities across the U.S. have since pledged to honor the Paris climate agreement.

Gore added he worried that Trumps decision to exit the agreement would be disastrous, but he was excited by the response of political leaders in the U.S.

A lot of our most important governors and mayors and business leaders said, Were still in the Paris Agreement, and were going to meet the commitments of the country regardless of what Donald Trump tweets.

Watch the whole clip in the video above.

This article has been updated with an updated figure for the number of mayors who have signed on to the Climate Mayors initiative.

More here:
Al Gore: 'I Was Wrong' About Donald Trump - HuffPost

8 Minutes After Saying ‘I Don’t Like Pinocchios,’ Donald Trump’s Nose Grows – HuffPost

WASHINGTON PresidentDonald Trumppaused after falsely claiming Monday that hes signed more bills and Im talking about through the legislature than any president ever.

I better say think, otherwise theyll give you a Pinocchio, Trump said, referring to The Washington Posts rating system for fact-checking politicians statements. And I dont like those, I dont like Pinocchios.

It took roughly 8.5 minutes for Trump, who has an extensive history of lies, to deliver what appears to be another doozy taking credit for the creation of tens of thousands of new mining jobs.

In Pennsylvania, two weeks ago,they opened a mine, the firstmine that was opened in decades. Opened a mine! he said during a speech to kick off the White Houses Made in America week, referring to the states new coal mine. And you know all the people that were saying the mining jobs?Well we picked up 45,000 mining jobs in a very short period of time. Everybody was saying, well,you wont get any mining jobs. We picked up 45,000 mining jobs.

And the miners are very happy with Trump and with Pence, Trump boasted. And were very proud of that.

While Americas miners may be happy with the administrations push for increased fossil fuel development, theres a problem: The number of coal mining jobs has increased by roughly 800 since Trump became president.

In a pair of posts to Twitter, Washington Post Fact Checker columnist Glenn Kessler addressed both Trumps Pinocchio comment and his claim about mining jobs.

Well, this is how you end up with Pinocchios! Kessler wrote, linking to the Posts fact-check of a similar claim made by the head of the Environmental Protection Agency last month.

In a series of TV interviews on June 4, in which he defended Trumps decisiontowithdrawthe U.S. from thehistoric Paris Agreement on climate change, EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt bragged that the administration had added 50,000 jobs.

Since the fourth quarter of last year until most recently, weve added almost 50,000 jobs in the coal sector, he told NBCs Meet the Press. In the month of May alone, almost 7,000 jobs.

However, there are only 50,800 coal mining jobs nationwide, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.

In another interview June 4 with Fox News, Pruitt said that since the fourth quarter weve had almost 50,000 jobs created in the mining and coal sector alone, being careful to not pin the number specifically to coal.

For his claim, Pruitt earned four Pinocchios the worst kind of falsehood from the Post.PolitiFact gave Pruitts claim a grade ofmostly false.

The Washington Post noted in its analysis that the increase in all mining and logging jobs since Trump took office was, at the time, around 33,000. Including preliminary figures for June, BLS estimates roughly 47,000 new mining and logging jobs have been added since December.

Trump didnt mention logging in his remarks Monday.

Read more here:
8 Minutes After Saying 'I Don't Like Pinocchios,' Donald Trump's Nose Grows - HuffPost

Sean Spicer Still Insists Donald Trump Jr. Meeting Was About Adoptions – HuffPost

WASHINGTON White House press secretary Sean Spicer on Monday appeared to be confused aboutDonald Trump Jr.s June 2016 meeting with a Russian lawyer, claiming it was about adoptions contradicting both Donald Trump Jr. and the president, who have both confirmed the true reason for the meeting.

During an off-camera briefing with reporters, Spicer claimed that the president has made it clear through his tweet, and there was nothing as far as we know that would lead anyone to believe that there was anything except for a discussion about adoption,referring to the original reason Trump Jr. gave for meeting with Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya.

Veselnitskaya has lobbied against the Magnitsky Act, a law passed by Congress in 2012 that imposed sanctions on Russian officials. In retaliation for the sanctions, the Kremlin imposed a ban on Americans adopting Russian children.

But both Trump Jr. and the president have affirmed that the real reason the younger Trump took the meeting was he was looking to obtain damaging information on campaign opponent Hillary Clinton.

The presidents tweet that Spicer referred to on Monday lays that out quite clearly, defending Trump Jr.s meeting as politics.

As detailed in emails released by Trump Jr. himself last Tuesdayin response to the New York Times uncovering the meeting, he clearly took the meeting after being offered information that he was told would incriminate Clinton and was part of Russia and its governments support for Mr. Trump.

If it is what you say I love it, Trump Jr. replied to an email from music publicist Rob Goldstone.

Later Tuesday, Trump Jr. defended the meeting in an interview with Fox News Sean Hannity, saying that it was simply part of normal campaign business.

Someone has information on our opponent. You know, things are going a million miles an hour. You know what its like to be on a campaign, he told Hannity. Wed just won Indiana but were talking about a contested convention. Things are going a million miles an hour again. And, hey, wait a minute. Ive heard about all these things, but maybe this is something. I should hear him out.

The president has also affirmed several times that the meeting was about Clinton. When asked about it last Thursday, he defended his son,claiming that most people would have taken that meeting,as it was very standard and part ofopposition research.

The meeting is the clearest indication yet that the Trump campaign may have colluded with Russia to influence last years election, a possibility that is the subject of multiple investigations.

Despite both fathers and sons insistence that the meeting was routine, many expertsbelieve it violated campaign finance lawsthat make itillegalto solicit, accept or receive contributions and donations from foreign nationals. Legal experts say this generally includes political opposition research.

Republican political operatives told HuffPost last week that itwould be unheard offor campaign veterans to take such a meeting, and that they would have reported it to the FBI.

Excerpt from:
Sean Spicer Still Insists Donald Trump Jr. Meeting Was About Adoptions - HuffPost