Mediaboss Marketing

TRUMP: We have to prime the pump.

ECONOMIST: It's very Keynesian.

TRUMP: We're the highest-taxed nation in the world. Have you heard that expression before, for this particular type of an event?

TRUMP: Yeah, have you heard it?

ECONOMIST: Yes.

TRUMP: Have you heard that expression used before? Because I haven't heard it. I mean, I just...I came up with it a couple of days ago and I thought it was good. It's what you have to do.

Trump, quite clearly, believes he came up with the phrase "prime the pump." Or at least that he is the first person to use it in regards the potential kick-starting effect of tax cuts on an economy.

A simple slip of the tongue by Trump? I don't think so.

Here's the thing with Trump: He is someone who has always created his own version of events and reality. One of his tried and true tactics as a businessman was, no matter the outcome of a deal, to declare victory and move on. He would aim to win the next day's press story -- knowing that for lots of people not paying close attention that would be all they would hear.

And he didn't stop doing it once he became a candidate for president. He would simply say things -- Muslims were celebrating on the roofs in northern New Jersey after 9/11, Ted Cruz's father might have been involved in JFK's assassination (or maybe he wasn't!), all the polls showed him beating Hillary Clinton -- that weren't factually true but seemed right to him. His gut -- the much-ballyhooed origin of most of Trump's political instincts -- told him this stuff was right, so who were fact checkers and biased media types to tell him -- or his supporters -- differently?

Trump kept building his own world once in the White House. He would have won the popular vote except for the 3 to 5 million votes cast by undocumented immigrants. His inauguration crowd was the biggest ever. His first 100 days were among the most successful of any president ever. And so on and on and on.

It didn't matter that all of these things were provably false. What mattered (and matters) is that Trump believed them. That made them truth to him.

Which brings us back to him inventing the phrase "prime the pump." Of course he didn't do that. But Trump came up with it in relation to his tax reform plan -- raising the deficit in the near term via tax cuts in the belief they will "prime the pump" for future economic growth -- so he, naturally, believed he was the first one to think it up.

That takes some significant self-regard. But also a sense that if you say it, it must be new and true. And Donald Trump believes that whatever he says is, by definition, new and true.

See the article here:
Donald Trump thinks he invented the phrase 'priming the pump.' That's telling. - CNN

New York Times

Donald Trump, 'Brexit,' Snapchat: Your Thursday Briefing New York Times A photographer from TASS, Russia's official news agency, captured President Trump's meeting with the Russian foreign minister, Sergey Lavrov, second from left, in the Oval Office on Wednesday. American news outlets were denied access. Credit Alexander ...

Read more from the original source:
Donald Trump, 'Brexit,' Snapchat: Your Thursday Briefing - New York Times

CNN

Partial transcript: NBC News interview with Donald Trump CNN ... with Donald Trump. Updated 2:29 PM ET, Thu May 11, 2017. (CNN) Read the partial transcript of NBC News' exclusive interview with Donald Trump on May 11, 2017, in which Trump said, "Regardless of recommendation, I was going to fire (James) Comey.

Visit link:
Partial transcript: NBC News interview with Donald Trump - CNN

Protest at the White House (Cal Sport Media via AP Images)

A peaceful protest march on the White House the day after President Trump unexpectedly fired Director of the FBI, James Comey. (Cal Sport Media via AP Images)

Donald Trump began his presidency in a troubling crisis of legitimacy, given charges that Russia meddled in the election to help him defeat Hillary Clinton, and that Clinton won the popular vote nonetheless. This crisis is now devouring him.

From the moment he and his staff began haranguing the media for accurately reporting the size of his inaugural turnout, compared with Obamas much larger crowds, we have been watching Trump spiral into paranoia. With the firing of FBI Director James Comey, we may be witnessing Trumps presidency unraveling.

Trumps cover story for Comeys dismissalthat brand-new deputy attorney general Rod Rosenstein wanted him gone, ironically due to his handling of the investigation into Hillary Clintons e-mail practices last yearhas completely come undone in 24 hours. On Wednesday, The New York Times reported that Comey told congressional leaders that days before his firing hed submitted to Rosenstein a request for resources to expand the Russia probe. By Thursday morning, a half-dozen major news outlets produced deeply reported pieces, some based on as many as 30 sources, revealing that Trump has been seething over Comeys handling of the investigation into alleged collusion between Trumps campaign and Russian government officialsand that his anger hardened into a plan to fire him last week. The Washington Post reported that Rosenstein threatened to resign, angry at being falsely depicted as the person behind Comeys firing. (The Justice Department is denying that report.)

It seems that on May 3, Comey committed his unforgivable sin while testifying before the Senate Intelligence Committee. Trump signaled his anxiety with a tweetstorm the day before. The Russia-Trump collusion story is a total hoax, when will this taxpayer funded charade end? one tweet read. Comey sealed his fate when he acknowledged his actions might have played a role in Trumps victory over Hillary Clinton. It made him mildly nauseous, he said, to think he tipped the race to the Republican. Comey himself was confirming Trumps darkest fear, the font of his angsty, crazy late-night and early-morning tweets: that he hadnt won the presidency legitimately.

Trumps biggest mistake in this whole fiasco may have been including this farcical claim in his very short letter of dismissal to Comey: I greatly appreciate you informing me, on three separate occasions, that I am not under investigation. If the firing had nothing to do with the very real investigation into Trumps campaign ties with Russian officials, why would Trump mention it? And if it does have something to do with the Russia-Trump investigationwhich far from denying, Comey had publicly confirmedthen Trump is obstructing justice.

If theres any remaining doubt that his personal legitimacy crisis is driving his crazy behavior, Trump is dispelling it by choosing today to sign an executive order establishing a commission to investigate (false) charges of voter fraud, headed by ace voter-suppressor Kris Kobach. Trump seems so comfortable with the rule-breaking and corruption he mastered in the private sector, he doesnt completely understand that he might want to shield his personal motivations more artfully. Hes claimed Clinton built her popular-vote margin with illegal voters; now that hes dispatched with Comey, hell use Kobach to slay his other legitimacy phantom.

THE STAKES ARE HIGHER NOW THAN EVER. GET THE NATION IN YOUR INBOX.

The big issue is what happens now. So far, influential GOP Senate leaders continue to oppose the appointment of a special prosecutor. Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell came out Wednesday morning and humiliated himself spouting Trump talking points, while Intelligence Committee Chair Richard Burr insisted his committee can continue with its bipartisan investigation. Meanwhile, Senate Democrats seem divided on their next moves. Minority leader Chuck Schumer seemed to threaten to stop all Senate work until a special prosecutor was appointed, but his caucus didnt go along. Theres a lot of business weve got to be doing right now that is unrelated to this, and I dont think we should have an overall rule about not doing business, Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia told The Atlantic, adding: We can chew gum and walk at the same time.

By the end of Wednesday Schumer seemed to retreat, stating on the Senate floor: There are many questions to be answered and many actions that should be taken. We will be pursuing several things in the coming days, and well have more to say about those next steps in the days ahead, he said in remarks delivered on the Senate floor. Right now, it might take more resistance to strengthen Democrats spines. Trump has a legitimacy crisis that may be morphing into a constitutional crisis. We need leaders from both parties to confront it squarely.

Read the original post:
We May Be Witnessing the Unraveling of Donald Trump's Presidency - The Nation.

We all know exactly why President Trump fired FBI Director James Comey. It had nothing to do with the reasons enumerated in the attorney general and deputy attorney general's letters.

Trump fired Comey because Comey was investigating his and his associates' ties to Russia. That's it. Attorney General Sessions had recused himself from the investigation, but unrecused himself long enough to join in the firing party.

Are you feeling the creeping terror? Me too. I've been trying to avoid joining the more conspiracy-minded brethren of the anti-Trump brigade for the last 110 days of his presidency, but this move makes it increasingly difficult not to suspect the worst.

There is no one, absolutely no one, in the federal government to hold the president of the United States accountable for anything he does. The Department of Justice should be run independently, but it's clear Jeff Sessions, whose recusal stems from his possible perjury at his confirmation hearing, will do nothing to make sure the president he supported from early on in the campaign follows the law.

Sessions' deputy, Rod Rosenstein, reportedly has a good reputation as a career prosecutor, but joining in this farce of a firing should destroy that reputation. Thanks to Sessions' recusal, Rosenstein has the power to appoint an independent special prosecutor to lead the investigation into Trump's Russian ties, but that seems unlikely now. And even if he does appoint one, it's clear Trump would have no compunction firing both Rosenstein and the prosecutor.

The investigation into Trump doesn't fall into the judicial system's purview, and besides, any case that did make it to the Supreme Court would face a solid conservative majority. It's always possible that one justice or another might break ranks, but Bush v. Gore showed us the Court is not above playing politics.

That leaves Congress.

Republicans control both houses, and so far they've shown no real interest in holding Trump accountable for anything he's done to break down America's democratic norms. Occasionally John McCain will take to cable news or the New York Times op-ed page to issue a gentle chiding; Ben Sasse, Lindsey Graham, Jeff Flake or Susan Collins may occasionally express some discomfort for something Trump says or something he does. But when it comes to action to taking a real stand to stop this corrupt, sad excuse of a man they have utterly failed.

So although McCain and a handful of fellow GOP Congress members have said, in the wake of the Comey firing, that there should be an independent investigation, I'm not holding my breath for them to take action to make it a reality.

Indeed, many Republicans in Congress are lining up behind Trump. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has already given a floor speech parroting White House talking points in defense of the Comey firing. (Yes, Democrats including me have criticized Comey. But the president firing the head of the FBI for investigating him still amounts to a constitutional crisis.) The head of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Chuck Grassley, took to Trump's favorite show, Fox & Friends, to tell critics of the firing to "suck it up and move on."

Trump is consolidating and expanding executive power in a way never seen in modern politics. Sally Yates, Preet Bharara, now James Comey anyone who shows any independence or stands up to this president is summarily fired.

How is there not a single Republican in Congress not one! who will take a real stand against this president? How can not one GOP senator question whether we should be allowing someone this power-hungry and corrupt to appoint judges or set their legislative agenda? Why can't principled conservatives show some backbone and leave the Republican Party, which has become entirely the property of one Donald J. Trump?

Maybe it's too much to hope for. Maybe there just aren't any elected Republicans left brave enough to do what's right. But that leaves my country in the hands of a madman who will do whatever he wants, whenever he wants, and get rid of anyone who tries to hold him accountable. You feel that creeping terror? Me too.

Watch Republican Senator Lindsey Graham and others react to FBI Director James Comey's firing.

Sign up for our newsletter to receive breaking news directly in your inbox.

Here is the original post:
There's No One to Hold Donald Trump Accountable - RollingStone.com