Mediaboss Marketing

The Trump SoHo building in New York City.

Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Ethics watchdogs and good-government types were quick to sound the alarm over Donald Trumps apparent violation of the Foreign Emoluments Clause. Even before Trump was sworn in, experts were warning that his continued ownership of his business empire meant that hed be accepting payments from foreign governments in violation of the U.S. Constitution. These could come in the form of payments for hotel stays by foreign diplomats, lease payments for office space from foreign state-controlled businesses, or any number of other ways. The issue is at the center of the firstand to date, most high profilelegal challenge to the presidents continued ownership of his for-profit business.

Josh Voorhees is a Slate senior writer. He lives in Iowa City.

It turns out, though, that Trump may also be violating a different emoluments clause, one that specifically bars him from receiving money or gifts above and beyond his mandated salary from governments right here at home. Via Article II (emphasis mine):

The general possibility that Trump would run afoul of that clause earned a brief mention in the larger emoluments lawsuit filed by the Center for Ethics and Responsibility in Washington, or CREW, in January, but it has remained mostly an undeveloped afterthought. On Wednesday, however, an investigative report from Reuters uncovered the evidence needed to turn the question from the general to the specific:

The payment flow chart is a little complicatedas is usually the case given the nesting doll of LLCs and trusts that make up the Trump Organizationbut it boils down to this: State or city-run pension funds in California, New York, Texas, Arizona, Montana, Michigan, and Missouri pay millions of dollars per quarter to CIM, which then turns around and pays a portion of that money via a subsidiary to a pair of Trump-owned companies to manage, market, and operate the SoHo hotel. According to the most recent publicly available numbers, the Trump-owned businesses bring in an estimated $9 million a year from the CIM deal.

The Domestic Emoluments Clause differs from its foreign counterpart in at least two important ways beyond where the emolument is coming from. First, while the foreign clause covers all office holders, the domestic one is focused exclusively on the chief executive. Second, while the Constitution allows Congress to make exceptions for some foreign emoluments, theres no such loophole for domestic ones. The rationale for including the domestic clause was to prevent a stateor even Congressfrom buying a favor from the president. The fact the framers felt it necessary to include two different emoluments clauses should tell you how serious of a concern they thought this was. In this case, the fear would be that other states might invest in this fundor some other one that also does business with Trumpin order to gain Trumps favor, or even avoid his ire.

Still, this might not be an open-and-shut case. As with foreign emoluments, there is the question of standing for any legal challenge. And as we saw with the convoluted workaround Trump found to maintain his government lease for his D.C. hotel, its possible the president can carve out some wiggle room if he were to restructure his company in a way where he did not receive any of the cash while still in office. It will ultimately come down to how broadly a court is willing to interpret a clause with little precedent. As Brianne Gorod, chief counsel at the Constitutional Accountability Center, a Washington public advocacy law firm, put it to Reuters: Were in largely uncharted territory given that past presidents have gone to great lengths to avoid the kinds of issues were now confronting. Trump, however, appears content to sail headlong into them.

Know anything about a potential conflict of interest in the Trump administration? DM Josh Voorhees on Twitter, or email him at josh.voorhees@slate.com.

Read the original:
Donald Trump May Also Be Violating a Different Emoluments Clause - Slate Magazine (blog)

Silicon Valleys top tech executives have tangled with President Donald Trump over everything from his travel ban to his approach on issues like climate change.

But the likes of Apple and Google appear to have put aside their differences with the Republican commander-in-chief, after he unveiled a tax reform plan on Wednesday that could dramatically lower their tax bills and help them return to the U.S. billions of dollars in profits currently overseas.

Trumps plan is still just an early set of ideas its a single page, not some complex, comprehensive piece of legislation and its already drawing complaints from Congress about its cost.

But the contours of it are catnip to the tech industry. Under his blueprint, for example, the corporate tax rate would fall to 15 percent, a major decrease from the current 35 percent rate. The plan also backs shifting the U.S. to a territorial tax system, meaning that only U.S.-based companies domestic earnings could be taxed.

And itd make it significant cheaper for companies to return their foreign profits to the United States. Currently, companies are taxed at a rate of 35 percent when they repatriate those dollars. If Trump has his way, though, businesses might get a one-time tax break perhaps a rate even as low as 10 percent to bring their cash back.

Thats a major boon for the tech sector, where five companies alone are estimated to have $505 billion in cash overseas, according to an analysis done last year by Moodys Investors Service. But the idea, known as a repatriation holiday, hasnt always delivered the economic benefits its proponents claim.

The likes of Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft and Intel through their leading Washington, D.C.-based lobbying group offered rare praise of Trump on Wednesday.

We stand ready to support tax reform that lowers the corporate rate, moves to a territorial system in which profits are taxed where they occur and invests in innovation that is needed to drive our economy to new heights of prosperity and job creation for the American people, said Andy Halataei, the senior vice president for government affairs at the Information Technology Industry Council. We appreciate todays announcement from the Trump administration and see it as a step toward advancing these objectives.

Tech giants have lobbied for years to advance robust reforms to U.S. tax laws, without much success. That includes Apple, where CEO Tim Cook has worked vigorously behind the scenes to make his case to congressional lawmakers and Trump administration officials. Others, like Google and Microsoft, have devoted millions of dollars toward lobbying federal regulators to lessen their tax bills, federal records show.

As part of the tech industrys push, those companies also fought aggressively against applying a new special tax on many imports, an idea called border adjustment. The idea is backed by the likes of House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wisc., but so far, Trump hasnt pursued it.

View original post here:
Finally, Silicon Valley and Donald Trump agree on something: Taxes - Recode

President Trump signed an executive order Wednesday to start pulling the federal government out of K-12 education, following through on a campaign promise to return school control to state and local officials.

The order, dubbed the Education Federalism Executive Order, will launch a 300-day review of Obama-era regulations and guidance for school districts and directs Education Secretary Betsy DeVos to modify or repeal measures she deems a overreach by the federal government.

For too long the government has imposed its will on state and local governments. The result has been education that spends more and achieves far, far, far less, Mr. Trump said. My administration has been working to reverse this federal power grab and give power back to families, cities [and] states give power back to localities.

He said that previous administrations had increasingly forced schools to comply with whims and dictates from Washington, but his administration would break the trend.

We know local communities know it best and do it best, said Mr. Trump, who was joined by several Republican governors for the signing. The time has come to empower teachers and parents to make the decisions that help their students achieve success.

Ms. DeVos and Vice President Mike Pence were on hand for the ceremony, which was attended by about 25 people, including teachers, lawmakers and the governors.

The executive order is not expected to have an immediate impact on school districts. Policy changes will follow a report on the findings of the review.

The review will will be spearheaded by the Department of Educations Regulatory Review Task Force, according to the order.

Ms. DeVos already has authority to modify or repeal regulations that are deemed a violation of federal law. The order, however, creates a review for identifying those areas and makes clear her mandate from the president to take action.

Reducing the federal governments role in K-12 is part of Mr. Trumps reform agenda that also includes the expansion of school choice programs.

Among those at the signing ceremony were Alabama Gov. Kay Ivey, Utah Gov. Gary Herbert, Maine Gov. Paul LePage, Nevada Gov. Brian Sandoval and Iowa Gov. Terry Branstad, who is Mr. Trumps nominee for ambassador to China.

Also in attendance were Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee Chairman Lamar Alexander of Tennessee and House Education and Workforce Committee Chairman Virginia Foxx of North Carolina.

The rest is here:
Donald Trump to pull feds out of K-12 education - Washington Times

I voted for Donald Trump because he promised to pursue a new foreign policy. As he said in December, We will stop looking to topple regimes and overthrow governments. Our goal is stability, not chaos, because we want to rebuild our country. He vowed to appoint those with new approaches, and practical ideas, rather than surrounding myself with those who have perfect rsums but very little to brag about except responsibility for a long history of failed policies.

After decades of disastrous interventions, Trump inspired me. But less than 100 days into his administration, Im feeling the sting of betrayal. In recent weeks, Trump and his surrogates have abandoned virtually every foreign policy stance he took during the campaign.

He launched missiles against the regime of Syrian strongman Bashar Assad mere months after telling the New York Times: I thought the approach of fighting Assad and [Islamic State] simultaneously was madness, and idiocy. Now Secretary of State Rex Tillerson is saying Assad must go, a clear indication that the Trump administration is looking to topple regimes and overthrow governments.

In another interview with the New York Times, Trump declared NATO obsolete, explaining, When NATO was formed many decades ago we were a different country. There was a different threat. Now we are told that NATO is no longer obsolete. Stay tuned for the Trump administrations campaign to bring back Betamax.

Wouldnt it be nice, Trump often said, if we could get along with Russia? This was music to my ears: finally a Republican candidate who wasnt locked into a Cold War mentality. Yet, Trumps appointees are now echoing the Washington policy wonks who want to start a new Cold War.

H.R. McMaster, Trumps national security advisor, claims the Russians are engaged in a campaign of global subversion. Tillerson, during his recent visit to Moscow, denounced Russias alleged interference in the 2016 election an echo of the Democrats unproved claim that the Kremlin colluded with his boss.

As Trump threatens to go to war with North Korea which would spell doom for the 38,000 American troops stationed on the Korean peninsula I am reminded of his comments on our military commitments in the region: There is going to be a point at which we just cant do this anymore . At some point, we cannot be the policeman of the world . [I]f we are attacked, [Japan doesnt] have to do anything. If theyre attacked, we have to go out with full force . Thats a pretty one-sided agreement.

Im not alone in feeling betrayed.

Ann Coulter, author of In Trump We Trust: E Pluribus Awesome, wrote recently that Trumps Syrian misadventure is immoral, violates every promise he ran on, and could sink his presidency. At Breitbart News, the online headquarters of the Trump insurgency, a piece about the Syria attacks attracted more than 50,000 ferociously negative comments. Pat Buchanan, the ideological godfather of Trumpism, despaired that the promise of a Trump presidency appears, not 100 days in, to have been a mirage. Will more wars make America great again? A baffled Laura Ingraham tweeted, "Missiles flying. Rubio's happy. McCain ecstatic. Hillary's on board. A complete policy change in 48 hrs." Talk radio host Michael Savage complains that People in Trumps own sphere are turning him toward the beating war drums. Nigel Farage, the leader of the Brexit forces in Britain who campaigned for Trump in the U.S., opined that the presidents supporters will be scratching their heads at these foreign policy reversals.

Its the same sad story on the domestic front. Instead of repealing Obamacare, Trump pushed what the House Freedom Caucus dubbed Obamacare lite. Trump the campaigner denounced both Hillary Clinton and Ted Cruz as pawns of Goldman Sachs; as president, hes appointed several Goldman Sachs executives to top spots in his administration. Not long ago, he told Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet L. Yellen whose visage was featured in a negative ad that ran in the last week of the campaign that she should be ashamed of herself, accusing her of politicizing the Fed and creating a very false economy. Now he says hes open to reappointing her.

The liberal media are thrilled by Trumps transformation: The chorus of gushing praise on CNN and MSNBC as bombs fell on Syria was loud and practically unanimous. And Trump is reciprocating: Last week at a White House event honoring first responders, he characterized the media as honorable people. Remember when he called them out as the worlds most dishonest people? Ah, those were the good old days!

And while Trump praises his enemies, he denigrates his loyal friends, openly downgrading Steve Bannon, the architect of his victory, as just someone who works for me.

As the elites rush to embrace the president, those of us who supported him are horrified, angry and increasingly convinced that instead of draining the swamp, Trump has jumped headlong into it.

Justin Raimondo is editorial director of Antiwar.com and author of Reclaiming the American Right: The Lost Legacy of the Conservative Movement."

Related articles:

Trump should try this instead of threatening North Korea

Did Donald Trump have a role in Bill O'Reilly's downfall?

Trump's warning to Democrats about Obamacare could be a bluff ... or an opportunity

Will things only get worse for Donald Trump?

Go here to see the original:
I voted for Donald Trump. Now I feel betrayed. - Chicago Tribune

We talked to historians, activists, authors, and White House veterans on how President Donald Trump's first 100 days measure up against his predecessors. Here are some more of their takeaways.

"He's almost unique in that he's a president who does not feel that because he made a statement six months ago that it has some degree of commitment" Michael Beschloss, presidential historian and MSNBC contributor

"I actually think the president and the White House are doing significantly better than they're getting credit for. I have been there. There is always an impatience in the press" John Sununu, former governor of New Hampshire and chief of staff to President George H.W. Bush

"In what's typically the honeymoon period, Democratic or Republican presidents will have the highest favorability numbers of their presidency. If this is his honeymoon period, my God" Cornell Belcher, Democratic strategist

RELATED: Special report on the start of a presidency

"The way that he has mastered social media to go around mainstream media and get his message to the American public is unique. It's something I imagine future presidents will continue to do" Jenny Beth Martin, co-founder of Tea Party Patriots

"He gets certain truths out by pitting Boeing against Lockheed or Ford against GM and Pfizer against Merck. He doesn't want some banal trade association pablum given to him" Jeffrey Sonnenfeld, Senior Associate Dean for Leadership Studies at Yale School of Management

RELATED: President Trump's First 100 Days: Full Coverage

"It's unclear who actually represents the administration. You have the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of State, the UN Ambassador and the White House spokesman all saying different things. Which one is operative?" Heather Hurlburt, director of the New Models of Policy Change initiative at New America

"If you're a major corporation now and you want to open a plant in Mexico, someone will raise the issue 'Is that a good idea under this president?' He's put fear in their hearts and that's a good thing" Chris Ruddy, Newsmax CEO and friend

"You listen to shows on the left and 'My gosh, it's chaos and craziness and nothing is happening,' and then you listen to shows on the right and it's 'This guy is getting Gorsuch through, we love the cabinet, he's doing executive orders'" Tevi Troy, historian and former HHS official under President George W. Bush

"Every president in the modern era comes in with an agenda, but what really tests the mettle of a president and what makes them go down in history is how they handle the crises that come their way that weren't part of their agenda." Margaret O'Mara, history professor at University of Washington and former Clinton official

"Almost every day he violates norms of behavior that have protected democracy for a long time, whether it's attacking the courts, or his predecessor, or the press in ways that go far beyond what modern presidents have done." Jonathan Alter, MSNBC analyst and author of The Defining Moment: FDR's Hundred Days and the Triumph of Hope

"There's no ideological coherence that underpins his presidency, which is why when one thing falls apart, the White House can't turn to something else" Jennifer Palmieri, director of communications on Hillary Clinton's 2016 campaign

More here:
In Their Own Words: Experts on Donald Trump's Presidency - NBCNews.com