WASHINGTON The Federal Reserve raised its benchmark interest rate on Wednesday, a sign of its continued confidence in the economy in the wake of President Donald Trumps inauguration.
The move, which reflects the Feds satisfaction with job growth and its mounting concern about inflation,is the first rate hike since Trump took office.
The central banks Federal Open Market Committee increased the target federal funds rate what banks charge one another for overnight lending by 0.25 percentage points, to a range of 0.75 percent to 1.0 percent.
Congress gave the Fed a dual mandate: to maximize employment, and to keep prices stable.The Fed raises the federal funds rate to tame inflation by putting downward pressure on job market growth.
When this form of interbank lending becomes more expensive, creditors tend to respond by increasing interest rates on home loans, auto loans, student loans, credit cards and a variety of other types of debt. As a result, the Feds quarter-percentage-point increase will likely squeeze borrowers and consumers, while upping the earnings of lenders and savers who rely on interest-bearing investments.
Although Wednesdays rate hike is just the third increase since the Fed lowered the influential rate to zero in December 2008, it is the second hike since December 2016, suggesting the Fed is finally accelerating its efforts to raise borrowing costs. Prior to December, the central bank had gone a year without raising the rate after global economic headwinds gave it caution.
Notwithstanding the long buildup, it is still too soon to raise the benchmark rate and risk putting the brakes on job growth, according to Dean Baker, co-director of the liberal Center for Economic and Policy Research.
Its the wrong move, Baker said on Tuesday. Its based on some wrong views about the economy, particularly that were closer to full employment than I think we are. But a quarter-point doesnt have a huge impact on the economy.
Baker is one of many economists, most of them progressive, who believe the low headline unemployment rate masks underemployment and fails to convey the lower pay of the new jobs being created.
The national unemployment rate dropped to 4.7 percent in February as the economy created 235,000 jobs.
But the official unemployment rate fails to account for people working part-time involuntarily, or people who have given up looking for work altogether. A broader metric that counts those workers as unemployed shows a jobless rate of 9.2 percent.
In addition, many American workers are settling for lower-paying work. Sixty percent of the net new jobs created between December 2007 and December 2016 were in retail, hospitality and other service sectors that tend to pay less and provide fewer work hours than other sectors, according to an analysis by Dan Alpert, founder of Westwood Capital and a fellow at the Century Foundation.
Meanwhile, a measure of price inflation that excludes volatile food and energy prices rose 1.7 percent in the 12-month period ending in January still below the Feds 2-percent inflation target. Baker and like-minded economists prefer the risk of exceeding that target to the risk of prematurely depressing the job market.
Stephanie Kelton, an economist at the University of Missouri-Kansas City and an economic adviser to the presidential campaign of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), agrees with Baker that the economy is still employing fewer people than it could.
But Kelton argues that there are limits to what the Fed should be expected to do to make up for the federal governments failure to boost growth through public spending. She is sympathetic to the idea that the Fed needs to raise rates so as not to deprive itself of the ability to stimulate the economy later.
Fed officials want some space, Kelton said. They want to be able to get away from zero with enough distance so when the next recession inevitably comes, theres some room to move down.
Economic observers now await the White Houses reaction to the Feds announcement. During the 2016 presidential campaign,Trump was critical of the Fed for failing to raise interest rates ahead of the November election, accusing Federal Reserve Board Chair Janet Yellen of artificially buoying the economy to benefit the incumbent Democrats.
But as Trump prepares a major package of tax cuts and a large infrastructure plan which even some of his critics believe could boost the economy further he could soon be on a collision course with the Fed for doing exactly what he claimed it should have done under President Barack Obama: raise interest rates.
Any of Trumps policies that create more jobs would likely prompt the Fed to increase the funds rate more rapidly. The contractionary impact of those hikes could offset any expansionary effect of Trumps agenda.
As with many issues, Trumps stance on the Fed has not been entirely consistent, and its possible he could embrace his old ideas if circumstances warrant it. Before Trump began arguing that Yellen was using low rates to inflate an economic bubble for political reasons, he hadexpressed support for her policies, claiming the low rates were good for U.S. exports.
Should Trump challenge the Federal Reserve for prioritizing concerns about inflation over allowing job growth to proceed unencumbered, he may find unlikely allies in progressive economists who have long taken issue with the Feds priorities.
At this point, I wont place bets on that. I guess well find out soon enough, Baker said.
Read the rest here:
The Federal Reserve Gives Donald Trump His First Interest Rate Hike - Huffington Post