Archive for the ‘Donald Trump’ Category

Donald Trump’s election flips both parties’ views of the economy – Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (blog)

Do political views color perceptions of the economy? Washington Bureau Chief Craig Gilbert fills us in.

Having Donald Trump in the White House has had a revolutionary effect on the economic outlook of Wisconsins most partisan voters, recent polling suggests.

In a flash, it has turned Republicans into rosy optimists and Democrats into dour pessimists, reversing the mood of voters in both parties.

You probably didnt need a poll to tell you that.

But the polling also tells us something more stark and fundamental about the partisan prism through which many voters see the world.

Trumps election did more than change the expectations of Republicans and Democrats about the economys future performance.

It altered their assessments of the economys actual performance.

When GOP voters in Wisconsin were asked last October whether the economy had gotten better or worse over the past year, they said worse by a margin of 28 points.

But when they were asked the very same question last month, they said better by a margin of 54 points.

Thats a net swing of 82 percentage points between late October 2016 and mid-March 2017.

What changed so radically in those four and a half months?

The economy didnt. But the political landscape did.

RELATED:You thought health care divided GOP? Check out a proposed import tax

Republican Trump replaced Democrat Barack Obama as president. With their own party now in power, Republicans overwhelmingly upgraded their evaluations of Americas economic performance.

Thats a testament to the power of partisanship to rewrite our perceptions, even when the objective reality has hardly changed, says the Marquette University Law Schools Charles Franklin, who conducted the polls cited above.

Something similar has happened in the nation as a whole. As the New York Times reported recently, Republicans and Democrats have done an about-face since the election in their economic outlook, with the partisan gap in national consumer sentiment bigger than ever before.

The Wisconsin polling is a striking illustration. Asked last month if, looking ahead, they expect the economy to get better, worse or stay the same over the next year, GOP voters chose better over worse by a margin of 80 points. Democratic voters chose worse over better by a margin of 43 points.

That is the biggest partisan gap Marquette has ever recorded on this question in 42 polls dating back to the beginning of 2012. And it represents a huge shift since last fall for voters in both parties.

But the Wisconsin polling adds some other wrinkles to thisstory.

In its polls, Marquette poses a second question on the economy, asking voters to rate its performance over the past year.

Across more than five years of Wisconsin surveys, the results show some very distinctive patterns.

One is that the Republicans have shifted more dramatically in their views of the economy than Democrats, from overwhelmingly negative during much of the Obama presidency to overwhelmingly positive with Trump now in the White House. Democrats assessments of the economy darkened after Trumps election, but the shifts in their views have been much more modest.

A roundup of commentary written by our opinion editors hits your inbox every Tuesday covering local topics of interest from the right, center and left.

Sign up for the newsletter

A roundup of commentary written by our opinion editors hits your inbox every Tuesday covering local topics of interest from the right, center and left.

Sign up for the newsletter

Two, the economic perceptions of both Republicans and Democrats have routinely seesawed with the states election cycles.

In presidential campaign seasons, Democratic voters have given the economy their best grades, Republicans their worst grades. Why?

One explanation is that the run-up to an election is when partisan voters are most likely to see the economy through a partisan lens. With Democrat Obama in the White House and his economic record a key campaign issue, his supporters see the economy in the best possible light, his opponents in the worst possible light.

In late October of 2012 on the cusp of the presidential election 59% of Wisconsin Democrats said the economy had gotten better over the previous 12 months. That is the highest figure recorded in 42 Marquette polls over five-plus years.

In the same survey, only 5% of GOP voters said the economy had gotten better. That is the lowest figure ever recorded by Marquette.

But just the opposite was true during the state's campaigns for governor, with Wisconsin Democrats givingthe economy their worst grades, Republicans their best.

For example, Democratic views of the economy worsened during the recall election over Gov. Scott Walker in the summer of 2012, improved during the fall 2012 presidential campaign, worsened during the 2014 race for governor, and improved again during the 2016 presidential campaign.

SPECIAL REPORT:Democratic, Republican voters worlds apart in divided Wisconsin

GOP perceptions moved in the reverse direction.

Why would elections for governor produce a different pattern in Wisconsin than elections for president?

One fundamental difference is that in the 2012 and 2014 races for governor, the politician whose record in office was under scrutiny was a Republican Walker. As a result, both parties adopted an entirely different economic message than the one they had during the most recent two presidential campaigns.

Walker aggressively touted the states economic performance under his leadership, while Democrats attacked it.The result? Republican voters grew more positive about the economy and Democrats grew more negative.

In fact, the best grades Republicans have ever given the economy in Marquettes more than five years of polling were on the eve of the 2014 election, when Walker was seeking a second term.That was also when Wisconsin Democrats gave the economy their very worst grades in 42 Marquette polls.

In short, Democrats and especially Republicans in Wisconsin have changed their views of the economy far more than actual economic conditions have changed. And those views have shifted in concert with the election cycles.

The polling suggests that many partisan voters look to their preferred candidates for cues about how to view the economy, says Franklin, which shows how much even economicreality is filtered through our subjective perceptions by voters own partisan leanings.

Read or Share this story: https://jsonl.in/2oLE0Nk

See original here:
Donald Trump's election flips both parties' views of the economy - Milwaukee Journal Sentinel (blog)

Donald Trump to Be First President Since Reagan to Speak at NRA Annual Meetings – Breitbart News

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER

He will speak to the NRAs 2017 Leadership Forum in Atlanta on April 28.

Breitbart News reported that the NRA endorsed Trump on May 20, 2016, during the 2016 Annual Meetings in Louisville, Kentucky. Thereafter, the NRA campaigned for Trump, and Trump reminded voters again and again that he would work with the NRA to save the Second Amendment if elected.

Trump will now return to speak to the gun rights group that cheered him to victory last year.Bloomberg reports that this will make him the first U.S. president to address the gun-rights group since Ronald Reagan in 1983.

Trumps speech to the NRA will occur two months to the day after he signed a repeal of Barack Obamas Social Security gun banwhich would have allowed the Social Security Administration to strip beneficiaries of the Second Amendment rights without due process. The speech also comes nearly two months after his Interior Secretary, Ryan Zinke, ended an Obama-era ban against using lead ammunition on federal lands.

On April 13, 2017, Breitbart News reported that the Trump administration has been quietly rolling back other Obama-era gun controls behind the scenes. McClatchy reported that federal agencies have narrowed the definition of fugitive, thereby limiting the number of people prohibited from gun possession because they are included in a fugitive database. Trump officials have also signaled that they may no longer defend the Army Corps of Engineers ban on carrying loaded firearms and ammunition on federal lands.

Trumps greatest pro-Second Amendment accomplishment was nominating Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court and securing his confirmation. Trump had promised to use SCOTUS to save the Second Amendment from people like Hillary Clinton, and Gorsuch is widely viewed as a fulfillment of that promise.

AWR Hawkins is the Second Amendment columnist for Breitbart News and host of Bullets with AWR Hawkins, a Breitbart News podcast. He is also the political analyst for Armed American Radio. Follow him on Twitter: @AWRHawkins. Reach him directly at awrhawkins@breitbart.com.

Originally posted here:
Donald Trump to Be First President Since Reagan to Speak at NRA Annual Meetings - Breitbart News

White House Responds to Claim that Trump Wants a Gold-plated Carriage Ride During London Trip – PEOPLE.com


PEOPLE.com
White House Responds to Claim that Trump Wants a Gold-plated Carriage Ride During London Trip
PEOPLE.com
The Times of London reported Saturday that President Donald Trump wishes to proceed with a gold-plated carriage procession during his visit to London, currently planned for the second week in October, despite security concerns. When former president ...

and more »

Go here to read the rest:
White House Responds to Claim that Trump Wants a Gold-plated Carriage Ride During London Trip - PEOPLE.com

Donald Trump can’t be sued because he’s president, his attorney claims in court – Washington Times

President Trump cant be sued for allegedly provoking his supporters to assault protesters at a pre-election rally last March because his standing as president precludes him from civil litigation, one of his attorneys said Friday.

Mr. Trump is immune from suit because he is President of the United States, R. Kent Westberry, an attorney for Mr. Trump, wrote in a filing entered Friday in in federal court in Kentucky.

The presidents lawyer offered that defense in response to a lawsuit brought last month on behalf of three individuals who say they were assaulted at a March 2016 campaign rally in Louisville upon Mr. Trumps instruction.

Get em out of here, Mr. Trump repeatedly said into the microphone when demonstrators disrupted the rally and that constitutes explicit directives, according to the lawsuit, that could have no other reasonable meaning but to remove protesters, including the Plaintiffs, using unwanted, harmful physical force.

The legal action brought last month on the protesters behalf seeks damages from two Trump supporters accused of assault as well as the president and his White House campaign.

While Mr. Westberry doesnt dispute Mr. Trump wanted the protesters removed from last years event, he offered several explanations in Fridays filing as to why he believes the lawsuit should be rejected, among them his clients position as president.

In a separate filing, meanwhile, one of the alleged assailants brought legal action of his own against Mr. Trump on Friday. Alvin Bamberger, a member of the Korean War Veterans Association, was captured on video pushing a plaintiff in the lawsuit, Kashiya Nwanguma, during last years rally. According to his own claim, however, Bamberger would not have acted as he did without Trump and/or the Trump Campaigns specific urging and inspiration, his filing reads in part.

To the extent that Bamberger acted, he did so in response to and inspired by Trump and/or the Trump Campaigns urging to remove the protesters.

Fridays legal filings were first reported by Politico.

Presidents change and lawmakers come and go, but The Washington Times is always here, and FREE online. Please support our efforts.

View original post here:
Donald Trump can't be sued because he's president, his attorney claims in court - Washington Times

How Donald Trump Met Reality – Newsweek

It was February 23 when Steve Bannon, Donald Trumps chief strategist, appeared with Reince Priebus, the presidents chief of staff, before an adoring audience at the Conservative Political Action Committee meeting. Wearing a black jacket and dark button-up shirt, Bannon prattled on about the deconstruction of the administrative state and went after the globalist, corporatist media. He spoke of economic nationalism, and the Trump teams desire to reconstruct our trade arrangements around the world. It was, arguably, the high point of Bannonism, the mix of isolationism, protectionism and nationalism that reinforced Trumps own instincts on those issues and helped get him elected.

Yet Bannonism didnt even last three months. Its promulgator is now said to be in retreat in the White Housepossibly soon to be jettisoned entirely, if the rumors are trueas the president publicly distances himself from him. (In an interview with New York Post columnist Michael Goodwin, the president saidaccuratelyI like Steve, but you have to remember he was not involved in my campaign until very late. I had already beaten all the senators and all the governors, and I didn't know Steve. I'm my own strategist, and it wasn't like I was going to change strategies because I was facing crooked Hillary.

Related: Meet Ezra Cohen-Watnick, Donald Trump's invisible man in the White House

When youre running the most powerful country on earth, its best to let reality intrude, and Trump, to his credit, has now done that. Some in the White House say his presidency effectively began on April 4, when Bashar al-Assad dropped sarin gas on innocent civilians, killing 82 men, women and children. Others believe the presidents reality check was already in motionthat the appointment of H.R. McMaster, the brainy Army general, as head of the National Security Council (who would later toss Bannon off the NSC) was a signal that the grown-ups were taking charge of the White House.

Whatever the precise moment, the facts are unmistakable: During the campaign, Trump bashed Wall Street and Goldman Sachs in particular. Now, Gary Cohn, Goldmans former chief operating officer, who heads Trumps National Economic Council, is rumored to be his future chief of staff. Jared Kushner, whose most important title is son-in-law, also has little time for Bannonism, and works on an ever expanding suite of issues.

Part of Kushners new portfolio: arranging the Mar-a-Lago summit meeting between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Trump, which is where the new Trumprevealed himself emphatically. Candidate Trump had mocked his rivals during the campaign for their militarism. Every time you see [South Carolina Senator] Lindsey Graham, he wants to bomb somebody, he once joked. Then, while at dinner with Xi, Trump bombed Syria. Im proud of him Graham would say later.)

This Syria attack startled many in Trumplandia. Conservative columnist Ann Coulter, a longtime Trump cheerleader, told Fox News that Trumps supporters didnt want more pointless wars, and that Assad is actually one of the least bad leaders in the Middle East. In a column, she wrote that Assad is not a murderous thug like Saddam, which would be news to the surviving family members of the more than 500,000 people killed in Syria over the last six years.

President Donald Trump walks along the West Wing colonnade with his daughter Ivanka Trump and his son-in-law Jared Kushner, who is senior adviser to the president for strategic planning, on March 17, in Washington, D.C. Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images

Bombing Assad wasnt the end of Trumps apostasy. Before the meeting with Xi, Trumps trade hawks were worried the president would toss out his economic agenda in exchange for Chinese cooperation on reining in North Koreas nuclear program. Which is precisely what happened. Trump shelved plans to label Beijing a currency manipulatordeliberately weakening its currency to boost exportsas he had repeatedly threatened to do during the campaign. But the decision wasnt just about North Korea. Behind the scenes, Cohn and his team had been educating the president on China and its currency, pointing out that Beijing was actually intervening to strengthen it against the dollar, not weaken it (a slowing economy and increased capital flight have put downward pressure on the renminbi).

This was the real world intruding, and it would happen again. Trump came into office saying he wanted better relations with Vladimir Putin and Russia, and his unwillingness to criticize the former KGB man fed critics who claim Trump somehow colluded with Moscow to win the election. This has led to an extraordinary spectacle in Washington. Many Democrats during the Cold War were consistently in favor of a dtente with the Soviet Union compared with conservative hawks who felt otherwise. Jimmy Carter chided Republicans for their inordinate fear of communism, and Ronald Reagans election in 1980 meant we were all going to go up in a nuclear flash. As recently as 2012, Barack Obama mocked Mitt Romney for calling Putin a threat; the 1980s are calling, and they want their foreign policy back, Obama said during a debate.

Now, Democrats strut around cable chat shows in Washington channeling their inner Dr. Strangelove, huffing and puffing about how awful Putin isand how his ties to Trump must be investigated. But if Trumps a Russian stooge, hes a really bad one. In the wake of the Syrian attack, Trump sent his secretary of state, Rex Tillerson, to deliver a message to Moscow: Drop Assad as a client, and if he uses chemical weapons again, well hit him again.

This is not what the Russians wanted to hear, and after Tillerson left Moscow, Trump said U.S.-Russian relations were now as poor as they have ever been. (No, this isnt the Cuban missile crisis, and we arent doing duck-and-cover drills. But if the president meant post-Soviet U.S.-Russia relations, his point was defensible.) Trump then irritated Moscow even more by hosting NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg in Washington. After the meetings, he acknowledged that during the campaign he had disparaged the alliance. But now?NATO, the president declared on April 12, is no longer obsolete.

It never had been. But the president was now more firmly grounded in the real world, not in Trumplandia. The irony that some members of his base prefer him in fantasyland is not lost on the New York real estate mogul. The flight to reality may actually cost him politically, and he knows it, says one adviser who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he wasnt authorized to speak publicly. But his attitude is, so be it. He has good people around him, and he listens.

The education of President Trump has begun. And thats a relief.

Correction: An earlier version of this story misspelled Reince Priebus's name.

See the original post here:
How Donald Trump Met Reality - Newsweek