Archive for the ‘Donald Trump’ Category

Poll: More Americans Trust The Media Than Donald Trump – Forbes


Forbes
Poll: More Americans Trust The Media Than Donald Trump
Forbes
Despite President Donald Trump's relentless attacks on the fake news media, a new poll from Quinnipiac University finds that more Americans trust the media than Donald Trump. A majority of Americans, 52%, said they trust the news media over Donald ...
Donald Trump is losing his war with the mediaWashington Post
Donald Trump's popularity is 'sinking like a rock'NJ.com
Poll: Trump's approval rating continues to dipCNN
The Independent
all 219 news articles »

See the original post:
Poll: More Americans Trust The Media Than Donald Trump - Forbes

What Donald Trump Doesn’t Understand About Anti-Semitism – The New Yorker

Hatred of Jews, like hatred of Muslims, is embedded more deeply in the Western consciousness than President Trump seems to understand.CreditPHOTOGRAPH BY OLIVIER DOULIERY / GETTY

The anti-Semitic threats targeting our Jewish community and community centers are horrible and are painful, and a very sad reminder of the work that still must be done to root out hate and prejudice and evil, President Trump said Tuesday at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, in Washington, D.C. He was referring, rather obliquely, to a spate of recent bomb scares and acts of vandalism, part of an uptick in hate crimes that has occurred since his arrival on the political scene. Trumps sentiment, however forced, was welcome, given the obtuseness, ambivalence, and even denial that have characterized his past responses to the problem. As a candidate and a President, he has seemed oddly untroubled by the license that anti-Semites derive from the us-against-them motif of his rants. But now, Trump says, the bigotry has to stop, and its going to stop.

Would that it were that simple. Anti-Semitism is not a run-of-the-mill example of hate and prejudice and evil, which is why contempt for Jews keeps showing up as a symptom of social stresseven now, and even in the United States. One neednt posit an eternal anti-Semitism, in Hannah Arendts warning phrase, to know that the imagination of the West has always defined itself positively against the negative other of Jewishness. That was blatantly the case in Germany in the sixteenth century, when Martin Luther characterized Jews as vermin within the German body politic, a pest in the midst of our lands. That belief ultimately came to flower, of course, in the exterminating anti-Semitism of Hitler, who saw the very existence of Jews as a mortal threat to the Thousand-Year Reich. But, as the Holocaust revealed, this fear infected both Nazi ideology and the broader Western consciousness. The crime of genocide may have been enacted by the Nazis, but Jews died as they did because the rest of Europeand America, tooexcluded them from moral concern.

Religious anti-Judaism, which became racial anti-Semitism, began long before Luther, stretching all the way back to the Gospels themselves. It is not just that Jews are labelled as Christs killers in the Passion narratives, but that Jesus is fully portrayed throughout the texts as fiercely opposed to his own Jewish people. (He came unto His own and His own received him not, John 1:11 says.) If Jesus was merciful, Jews were condemning; if Jesus was egalitarian, Jews were hierarchical; if Jesus was generous, Jews were greedy. Soon enough, Christians imagined that Jesus had never really been Jewish to begin with. Never mind that this was a terrible mistake of memory, that he was a faithful, law-observing, Shema-proclaiming Jew to the end, and that, Johns words notwithstanding, the only ones to receive Jesus in his lifetime were Jews. The imagined conflict persisted, and it informed the structure of Christian theologychurch against synagogue, New Testament against Old, Christian god of mercy against Jewish god of judgment. Down through the centuries, this positive-negative bipolarity formed the twin pillars of European consciousness, and, whenever the social equilibrium shook, Jews were targeted. When the targeting reached its genocidal peak, in the twentieth century, the old hatred was exposed once and for all.

Well, not quite for all. The Holocaust was a world-historic epiphany, but not to the Trump Administration, which last month erased the Holocausts most salient feature by deliberately omitting any reference to Jews from the White Houses official statement on International Holocaust Remembrance Day. Trumps generalizing in that statementthe victims, survivors, heroeswholly ignored the fact that Hitlers industrialized death machine was created expressly to eliminate one particular people. To neglect that purpose is to restrict responsibility for the broad civilizational crime, with roots in the religious anti-Judaism of the Christian Church, to a small gang of Nazi thugs, as if no one else were guilty. Both the neglecting and the restricting are forms of Holocaust denial.

If it is too much for Trump to grasp anti-Semitism as the bug in the software of the West, it is not likely that he will see how his own Islamophobia comes from the same malicious code. When Christendom launched the Crusades, the holy wars that shaped Europe, in the eleventh century, Jews were the paradigmatic enemy inside (the infidel near at hand), and Muslims became the defining enemy outside (the infidel far away). Little wonder, then, that the First Crusade coincided with some of the earliest German pogroms, known as the Rhineland massacres. Within a few hundred years, the Spanish Inquisition had instituted its blood-purity laws, which lumped Muslims and Jews together in a new category of biological inferiority. In 1492 and 1502, first Jews and then Muslims were declared personae non gratae in Spain, facing forced conversion, expulsion, or death. The invention of racism in Europe, in other words, aligned neatly with the discovery of the New World and the advent of colonialism. Genocide and slavery followed.

Islamophobia is thus, to use the phrase that Edward Said applied to Orientalism, a strange secret sharer of Western anti-Semitism. This hidden alignment was particularly discernible in the ease with which the Cold War, with its ubiquitous, if subliminal, anti-Semitism, morphed into the clash of civilizations, with jihadists replacing Reds as figments of the American nightmare. Trump no doubt regards himself as an American original, but he is only the latest ringmaster of this binary circus. In fact, our temperamental President is bigotrys clich. Even the cult of white supremacy on which his movement depends has its origins, too, in the positive-negative structure of the Western imagination, a structure erected in the first place to keep Jews in their place. It may offend Donald Trump to be linked to an ancient current, but while his arrival, with all its mayhem, is an unprecedented crime against democratic values, it is also evidence of the deeper disorder from which our culture has yet to recover.

See more here:
What Donald Trump Doesn't Understand About Anti-Semitism - The New Yorker

Democrats’ insatiable appetite for opposition to Donald Trump – Washington Post

If there are two charts that suggest a very polarized, nasty four years ahead, they're these two.

First, we have Republican voters saying they are more likely to side with President Trump if and when he clashes with GOP leaders.

And second, we have Democratic voters saying, overwhelmingly, that they are more worried about their leaders doing too little to stop Trump rather than going too far.

In other words, when Trump does something a little further out to the extreme -- like a travel ban, for instance -- GOP base voters are more apt to take his side. And when Democrats don't go to extremes to stop Trump -- as in, say, filibustering Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch -- they risk incurring the wrath of a base that wants them to pull out every stop at all times.

As Philip Bump notes, the first half of this equation isn't all that surprising. GOP voters have long sided with Trump over GOP congressional leaders, dating back to the 2016 campaign. The relative unpopularity of those leaders probably doesn't help their case. And the same thing happened early in Barack Obama's presidency, with 65 percent saying in a 2009 CNN poll that they deferred to Obama when he disagreed with congressional Democrats. Just 26 percent sided with Democrats in Congress.

But the second part is more notable. We've seen evidence of this absolute anti-Trumpism in the Democratic Party in the form ofphone-calling campaigns that led to overwhelming Democratic votes against Cabinet picks and protests including the Women's March on Washington and now the tumultuous congressional town halls. These numbers quantify it.

Americans are flocking to Republican legislators' town hall meetings with questions about health care, immigration and more. (Sarah Parnass/The Washington Post)

The Pew polls also shows Democrats aren't particular enamored of the man who has flirted with working with Trump on certain issues -- and who really is the one Democratic leader standing in Trump's way: Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.). Schumer is viewed unfavorably by 26 percent of Democrats and Democratic-leaning voters, compared to 37 percent who see him favorably. His favorable rating with Democrats actually isn't all that much higher than it is with Republicans (24 percent).

Those are the kinds of numbers that Republican leaders became accustomed to when their party's base saw them as insufficiently anti-Obama.

And let's not forget that the tea party movement wasn't just a response to Obama, but also to GOP leadership that was seen as wishy-washy and not firm enough on conservative principles. These numbers suggest a similar environment on the left side of the aisle in the early days of the Trump presidency.

The rest is here:
Democrats' insatiable appetite for opposition to Donald Trump - Washington Post

Donald Trump Is Basically ‘Black Bush’ From Chappelle’s Show – The Root

At this point Im convinced that President Asshat is trolling us. That he believes none of the stuff he says or does, and in the end hes just re-enacting the Black Bush skit played brilliantly by Dave Chappelle on Chappelles Show.

During an impromptu press conference at the White House last week, Asshat was asked about the recent resignation of National Security Adviser Gen. Michael Flynn and his ties to Russia. Asshats answer was, I have nothing to do with Russia ... nobody mentions that Hillary received questions to the debates.

Which got me thinking: That answer isnt very far off from Chappelles President Black Bush, who was asked during a fake press conference if he was invading Iraq because of its ties to oil.

What? Black Bush responds. Huh? Oil? Who said something about oil, bitch; you cooking? Black Bush then knocks over a pitcher of water and runs from the room.

Which also got me thinking: Asshat has been running the White House with the same tone and tenor that Black Bush would have had if hed been real, which led me to this conclusion: Asshat is the real-life Black Bush.

Asshat doesnt respect the United Nations. In fact, just as recently as December, Asshat called the U.N. a waste of time and money. Trump has repeatedly threatened to leave the 71-year institution and added that its little more than a club for people to get together, talk and have a good time.

Many believe that Trumps fixation with his administrations media portrayal is nothing more than a distraction to keep people off the scent of how horrible his administration actually is. Since the media serves as the bridge between his administration and the public, Asshat continually attacks the medias credibility. If he can encourage people to believe that the media isnt trustworthy, then he provides doubt on whether his administration is actually a bag full of deplorables.

Clearly hes outmatched at every turn, and its brilliant to watch. While Melissa McCarthy has nailed Sean Spicy Facts Spicers temperament and inability to answer anything with a straight answer, I would argue that Black Bushs Black Head of the CIA was the original Spicy Facts.

Doesnt matter if the policy was implemented by Asshat or whether it was a leftover remnant of the Obama administration; if theres a celebration to be had, best believe that Asshat is taking to Twitter to talk about it. After one of the worst shootings in U.S. history, Trump took to Twitter to brag on being right about radical Islam.

And in May 2013, he sent this tweet out to all his followers:

Asshat on Twitter sounds a lot like the time Black Bush defeated Iraq.

Im not sure if its the braggarts behavior, his insistence on spouting nonfacts as undeniable truths or the inherent humor behind his frightening inability to form a complete thought, but Trump is studied in the Black Bush approach toward governing, and its only sad to us because this skit has the potential to last four long years.

See the original post:
Donald Trump Is Basically 'Black Bush' From Chappelle's Show - The Root

Donald Trump’s streak of falsehoods now stands at 33 days – Washington Post

Donald Trump has been president for all or part of 33 days. He has averaged four falsehoods or misleading statements a day(!) in that time. There hasn't been a single day of Trump's presidency in which he has said nothing false or misleading.

That data, which comes from a terrific new project from The Post's Fact Checkerthat seeks to document Trump's statements in the first 100 days of his presidency, is stunning. This chart, in particular, stood out to me:

On Trump's first day in office, he made seven (or more!) misleading claims. That was one of four days in which he has made seven-plusfalse or misleading claims; that's roughly 12 percent of all the days hehas spent in the White House. In fact, there are more days (18) when Trump has made four or more misleading/false claims than days (15) when he has made one or two.

On Inauguration Day, President Trump's address painted a bleak portrait of the nation. The Post's Fact Checker looked at five of his claims. (Jenny Starrs/The Washington Post)

What this Fact Checker project affirms is that Trump has changed nothing in his approach to the truth since being elected president. During the course of the campaign,nearly two-thirds of hisclaims that The Post's fact-checking team looked into were rated Four Pinocchios meaning that they were found to be totally and completely false. By comparison, 14 percent of Clinton's fact-checked statements received four Pinocchios.

Theres never been a presidential candidate like Donald Trump someone so cavalier about the facts and so unwilling to ever admit error, even in the face of overwhelming evidence, WaPo lead fact-checker Glenn Kessler wrote during the heart of the 2016 campaign.

Substitute presidential candidate for president and Kessler's statement holds just as true for Trump's first month in office. All politicians stretch the truth to suit their political and policy purposes. None do so as often and as unapologetically as Trump has during his first 30-plus days in office.

Will that affect Trump's political future? Perhaps less than you might think. In a Fox News poll conducted earlier this month, 45 percent of people said they trust his administration more than the media to tell the truth to the public while 42 percent said they trust the media more. That distrust of the media coupled with Trump's aggressive efforts to discredit the press make stats like those above irrelevant to many of his supporters.

Of course, when facts and truth become matters of debate, no one really wins.

Continued here:
Donald Trump's streak of falsehoods now stands at 33 days - Washington Post