Archive for the ‘Donald Trump’ Category

Donald Trump indictment: What to know about falsifying business records – ABC News

Several hot-button legal inquiries loom over former President Donald Trump -- everything from election interference and misuse of classified documents to defamation of a writer after an alleged rape.

He has consistently denied any wrongdoing.

However, the indictment and arraignment of Trump earlier this week, the first for an ex-president in U.S. history, has drawn the nation's attention to a rarely discussed white-collar financial crime: falsifying business records.

As part of a scheme to reimburse former Trump attorney Michael Cohen for hush money payments to porn actress Stormy Daniels, Trump fraudulently recorded $130,000 in expenses as the cost of legal services for Cohen, the indictment alleges.

In Manhattan criminal court, Trump pleaded not guilty on Tuesday to all 34 counts of falsifying business records. He has denied having sex with Daniels.

In a press conference on Tuesday, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg characterized the validity of business records as fundamental to a well-functioning economy.

"This is the business capital of the world," he said. "The bedrock, in fact the basis, for business integrity and a well-functioning business marketplace is true and accurate record keeping."

Here's what to know about the crime of falsifying business records and the typical penalties, according to interviews with New York City-based criminal defense attorneys.

Falsifying business records, a violation of New York state law, constitutes the entry of inaccurate information on a business document to benefit oneself.

In other words, a description of the crime is "sort of in the name," Adam Konta, a senior partner at Manhattan-based law firm Konta, Georges & Buza, told ABC News.

However, the crime of falsifying business records not only requires an incorrect entry on a company form but also an intent to mislead in an effort to reap reward.

"Every crime requires both an act and a criminal intent behind the act," Matthew Galluzo, a criminal defense attorney in New York City and a former prosecutor in the New York County District Attorney's Office, told ABC News.

If a boss asks a secretary to mark a form incorrectly and he or she does so without awareness of an attempt to mislead, the secretary is innocent of a crime, Galluzo said.

Similarly, an accidental or harmless recording error falls short of a crime, he added.

The most common example of the crime involves fibbing about a company's financial information for the sake of evading or minimizing tax payments, or in an effort to hoodwink potential investors, Galluzo said.

The crime of falsifying business records constitutes either a misdemeanor or a felony, depending on the circumstances of a given violation, the attorneys said.

The act rises to a felony when the inaccurate record is entered as part of an effort to commit a different, underlying crime, the attorneys said.

The misdemeanor version of the crime usually means "destruction or falsification of business records," Konta said. "When you're doing that in hopes of committing a separate crime, then it's what's called a 'bump up.'"

The standard is akin to the legal treatment of trespassing, Konta added, noting that the mere act of trespassing is a relatively minor crime but the charge becomes far more serious if a trespasser attempts to steal.

In the Trump indictment, Bragg didn't specify the underlying law Trump attempted to break when he allegedly falsified business records.

"The indictment doesn't specify it because the law does not so require," Bragg said at a press conference on Tuesday, later mentioning possible secondary crimes that include illegal promotion of a political campaign and an attempt to make false claims on tax forms.

The defense will likely attempt to force Bragg to specify which underlying crime Trump attempted to commit, while Bragg will try to keep the interpretation open-ended, so the jury merely has to find Trump attempted to commit a crime rather than any specific one, Galluzo said.

"The statute itself seems to suggest you just have to prove he was trying to break a law," Gallluzo said. "Defense attorneys will say, 'Well, you have to tell us what law and prove that law specifically.'"

"Prosecutors will try to keep it vague and flexible so the jury can say maybe it was this or maybe it was that, but it's got to be one of them," he added.

The maximum penalty for a felony count of falsifying business records is four years in state prison.

"However, there's no mandatory minimum sentence," Galluzo said.

Due to Trump's age and lack of a criminal history, a jail sentence of any length is unlikely if he is convicted, Galluzo added, noting however that the 13-month jail sentence served by Cohen in a related case potentially raises the possibility of incarceration for Trump.

In federal court, Cohen pleaded guilty to two violations of campaign finance law resulting from hush money payments made to Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal. Trump also denies having sex with McDougal.

In addition, Cohen pleaded guilty to five counts of tax fraud and one count of false statements made to a bank.

Penalties in falsification of business records cases are often driven by the amount of money at stake in the potential fraud, Daniel Hochheiser, a criminal defense attorney in New York, told ABC News.

Trump is alleged to have reimbursed Cohen for $130,000 in hush money payments, though the statement of facts accompanying the indictment claims that then-Trump Organization Chief Financial Officer Allen Weisselberg agreed to a total repayment of $420,000, including other expenses and a year-end bonus.

"Somebody who makes a false business record in a $100,000 fraud is generally punished less severely than somebody who makes a false entry in a record involved in a scheme to commit a $10 million fraud," Hochheiser said.

"I don't see any scenario in which Trump goes to jail," Hochheiser added. "Even if he's convicted of everything."

Here is the original post:
Donald Trump indictment: What to know about falsifying business records - ABC News

Bill Barr Warns Donald Trump Should Be Most Concerned About The Classified Documents Case – Vanity Fair

FormerDonald Trump-picked Attorney GeneralBill Barrspoke candidly on Sunday about Trumps 2024 run, his verbal attacks on the Manhattan judge, and his legal cases, saying the former president should be most concerned about the documents case at Mar-a-Lago.

He had no claim to those documentsespecially the classified documents. They belong to the government. I think he was jerking the government around, Barr said on ABCs This Week about the federal case into the classified documents found at Trumps Florida estate.

Trump unfortunately has a penchant for engaging in reckless and self-destructive behavior that brings these kinds of things on him. In many respects, he's his own worst enemy, Barr added. Hes dug himself a hole on the documents [case]...It doesnt surprise me that he has all these legal problems. He was warned about them before he left office.

View more

Barr also criticized how Trump attacked JudgeJuan Merchan. After the former president was charged with 34 felonies in the hush-money case, he called Merchan a Trump-hating judge, with a Trump-hating wife and family, whose daughter worked forKamala Harris and now receives money from the Biden-Harris campaignand a lot of it.

I dont think it is appropriate or wise.The president notoriously lacks self-control and he frequently gets himself into trouble, Barr said about Trump name-calling Judge Merchan. Barr was, however, critical of the Manhattan case, saying that he thought it lacked merit. I think it is transparently an abuse of prosecutorial power to accomplish a political end. I think it is an unjust case. Thats not to say that every legal challenge that the president faces is unjustified. But this one especially is, Barr said.

The former AG was equally critical of Trumps 2024 presidential run. Barr said that while his base will likely rally around Trump as the criminal investigations are ongoing because they view this as persecution, Barr thinks that Trumps legal woes will hinder him in the actual election:As far as the general election is concerned, it will gravely weaken Trump. He's already, I think, a weak candidate that would lose, but I think this sort of assures it.

Perhaps demonstrating the self-destructive behavior that Barr was describing, Trump wrote a rambly, all-caps holiday message on Truth Social: HAPPY EASTER TO ALL, INCLUDING THOSE THAT DREAM ENDLESSLY OF DESTROYING OUR COUNTRY BECAUSE THEY ARE INCAPABLE OF DREAMING ABOUT ANYTHING ELSE, THOSE THAT ARE SO INCOMPETENT THEY DON'T REALIZE THAT HAVING A BORDER AND POWERFUL WALL IS A GOOD THING, & HAVING VOTER I.D., ALL PAPER BALLOTS, & SAME DAY VOTING WILL QUICKLY END MASSIVE VOTER FRAUD, & TO ALL OF THOSE WEAK & PATHETIC RINOS [Republicans in Name Only], RADICAL LEFT DEMOCRATS, SOCIALISTS MARXISTS, & COMMUNISTS WHO ARE KILLING OUR NATION, REMEMBER, WE WILL BE BACK!"

This years Easter message from Trump seems like the perfect follow-up to last years, in which he lambasted New York Attorney GeneralLetitia James, who wasinvestigating the Trump Organizations finances: Happy Easter tofailed gubernatorial candidate and racistAttorney General Letitia James. May she remain healthy despite the fact that she will continue to drive business out of New York while at the same time keeping crime, death, and destruction in New York.

The rest is here:
Bill Barr Warns Donald Trump Should Be Most Concerned About The Classified Documents Case - Vanity Fair

Donald Trump wins $120,000 from Stormy Daniels in failed … – NPR

Stormy Daniels talks with a journalist in Berlin shortly after her lawyer filed a defamation case against Donald Trump on her behalf in October 2018. Ralf Hirschberger/DPA/AFP via Getty Images hide caption

Stormy Daniels talks with a journalist in Berlin shortly after her lawyer filed a defamation case against Donald Trump on her behalf in October 2018.

As Donald Trump was in New York for a date with legal jeopardy, a judge in Los Angeles quietly granted him a substantial legal victory.

The Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled in favor of the former president on Tuesday, ordering adult film star Stormy Daniels to pay $121,972 in legal fees for a failed defamation suit.

The ruling is not legally connected with the Manhattan district attorney's investigation that led Trump to be charged with 34 felony counts on Tuesday. But it does stem from the same event: Daniels claims she had an affair with Trump in 2006, then was paid by Trump's legal team to avoid going public with the story ahead of the 2016 presidential election.

Trump denies the affair but has since admitted he reimbursed his then-attorney Michael Cohen for the hush money payments.

Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, tried to sue Trump for defamation in 2018, specifically taking aim at a tweet attacking her account of being threatened by a stranger in 2011 to stay quiet on her Trump story. Trump attacked the account as a "con job, playing the Fake News Media."

Federal Judge S. James Otero dismissed the lawsuit, saying Trump's tweet constitutes " 'rhetorical hyperbole' normally associated with politics and public discourse" and is protected by the First Amendment.

Daniels tried to appeal the decision in 2022, saying her then-attorney Michael Avenatti filed the defamation suit "without my permission and against my wishes." But a judge ruled against her, leaving her on the hook for nearly $300,000 in Trump's legal fees.

Daniels subsequently filed a motion to knock down the fee payment. On Tuesday, the court dismissed in part her latest request, which only increased the bill she has to pay.

Daniels argued that the fee request was "unreasonable and excessive," saying the law group had overstaffed the appeal and performed duplicative tasks, and asked for fees to be reduced, court documents show.

She specifically asked the judge to cap the law firm's rates at $500/hourly for partners and $350/hourly for associates a request the appeals commissioner denied on account of "inflation and increase in the attorneys' experience."

The court denied a secondary request for Daniels to reimburse Trump $5,150 for time responding to the most recent appeal, saying the request lacked itemized detail about the law firm's billing.

"Collectively, our firm obtained over $600,000 in attorney fee awards in his favor in the meritless litigation initiated by Stormy Daniels," said Trump attorney Harmeet Dhillion in a tweet celebrating the legal victory.

After the appeals court ruled against her last year, Daniels tweeted: "I will go to jail before I pay a penny."

See the original post:
Donald Trump wins $120,000 from Stormy Daniels in failed ... - NPR

Urine-Drinking Anti-Vaxxer Is Denied His Dinner With Donald Trump … – The Daily Beast

Anti-vaccine leader Christopher Key has long sought to confront one specific idiotformer President Donald Trump. He almost got his wish.

Key holds a deep grudge against Trump for, as he put it, releasing a bioweapon onto the world. That bioweapon is just the COVID-19 vaccine, which has saved, by some estimates, tens of millions of lives. But that hasnt stopped Key from taking extreme measures to advocate against the vaccine.

Key is so adamant that the vaccine does harm, in fact, that he drinks his own urine.

That strategy, known on the far right as looping, is supposed to cure COVID-19 symptoms. Key has long urged his supporters to follow his lead and collect their morning urine to drink throughout the day. (As noted in a Reuters fact-check, there is no evidence that sipping your own urine can magically cure you from a case of coronavirus.)

While Key has plenty of foesDonald Trump, Democratic state governors that he seeks to place under citizens arrest, even Whole Foods grocery stores everywhereits become something of his lifes mission to confront the former president.

So when tickets went on sale for $500 for an evening with Donald Trump Jr. and former congressional candidate Joe Kent in Palm Beach, Key leapt at the chance. It was Keys understanding that the former president might drop by the event, as hes been known to do, and Key would finally have a chance to confront Trump. And either way, hed get a chance to challenge Don Jr..

Open Bar and Hors doeuvre Provided, the invitation said.

Key didnt partake in the hors doeuvreshes on a liquid fastand he didnt end up getting a chance to confront Don Jr.

In the midst of indictment chaos back at Mar-a-Lago, the fundraiser only elicited a short appearance from Don Jr.

Supposedly, his father got indicted today...we were supposed to do a lot of one-on-one time, Key told The Daily Beast. Nobody really got to talk to him at all because he was in and out.

Key did walk away, he thought, with another chance to confront the former presidents son; he placed an $11,000 winning bid to have a private dinner with Don Jr.once again, with the hope that the former president might drop by.

We encourage you to request a date when President Donald Trump is staying at Mar-a-Lago as it is his habit to visit dinner guests, and you may then have the opportunity to greet him, a March 31 letter sent to Key said.

But apparently, after Trumpworld found out about Key and his history, they canceled the dinner, and Key was once again denied his opportunity.

In recent months, Key has taken his QAnon beliefs and claims that he is a sovereign citizen, to new heights. The latter claim, which essentially involves a far-right theory that one doesnt have to follow laws, has been bolstered by Keys claims that he doesnt drive his car, so much as he travelsa pointless distinction that Key believes means his car isnt subject to normal road rules because its a wagon, with wagon wheels.

The anti-vaccine leaderwho calls himself the Vaccine Police and wears a police-like badgealso parades around with a flamethrower, though he has no authority.

Kent ally Matt Braynard and a Don Jr. spokesperson didnt return The Daily Beasts request for comment.

The now-canceled dinner between Key and Don Jr. is a near-miss for the Trump campaign, which has long struggled to keep extremist Mar-a-Lago visitors at bay. Most notably, last year, Trump welcomed disgraced rapper Kanye West and white nationalist Nick Fuentes, which drew nearly universal condemnation from Democratic and Republican lawmakers alike on Capitol Hill.

But Key was apparently too wild for Mar-a-Lago.

I believe that they went and did the research, and they found out who I was, and the last thing they wanted me to do was to sit down with Donald Trump Jr. and his father, Key told The Daily Beast while adding he was going to go after both of them about the bioweapon.

He knows my stance on adrenochrome, he concluded.

Link:
Urine-Drinking Anti-Vaxxer Is Denied His Dinner With Donald Trump ... - The Daily Beast

For Once, Donald Trump Did Not Enjoy the Show – The New York Times

The Manhattan Criminal Courthouse hallway was not the sort of stage that Donald J. Trump would have handpicked for himself.

As tabloid figure, reality-TV star and president, Mr. Trump always paid close attention to his set dressing. With an instinct for the camera, he preferred settings that conveyed grandeur and lent him an aura of power, be they the made-for-TV boardroom of The Apprentice, the Trump Tower escalator at his 2015 campaign announcement or the church on Lafayette Square where he held a photo-op after police tear-gassed protesters.

The hallway outside the courtroom where Mr. Trump became the first former president to be criminally indicted was no glitzy platform. The floors were scuffed and the walls drab. The camera focused on a pair of safety-glass double doors, reflecting red EXIT signs, through which a glum-looking Mr. Trump passed on his way to his arraignment. The scene was gray, humdrum, municipal, more Night Court than Supreme Court. You could practically smell the vending-machine coffee.

The result made visually real what had become a clich in the case: No one was above the law. Mr. Trump was right there in the laws nondescript belly (despite the special accommodations that went into his arraignment). In still courtroom images instantly plastered on screens, he sat in the dock like any other defendant, slumped, watched by court guards.

It was an unprecedented sight, a former president being arrested and charged. But as the camera framed him, he was just a guy from Queens waiting to hear from the judge.

Reports before the arraignment said that Mr. Trump planned to speak to the press before entering the courtroom. He did not. Though he had mulled the value of doing a perp walk, there was no such parade. There was no mug shot. There were no handcuffs.

But he was shackled nonetheless: He was for once not at liberty to choose his own scenery. The man who never met a TV camera he couldnt hog made a quick turn away from it. The man who for the four years of his term had people wondering what would come out of his mouth next kept his lips sealed. The man who practiced the art of media saturation was reduced to a handful of stills and a Grinch-y courtroom sketch.

If the indictment put Mr. Trump in an unfamiliar position, for cable news it was like a trip back in a time machine. Fox News hosts fervently defended Mr. Trump after spending months distancing themselves. Other cable outlets returned to their all-Trump-all-the-time default setting from years ago.

During the 2016 campaign, cable networks aired Mr. Trumps empty podium before his speeches. On Monday, there were live shots of his plane sitting on a Florida tarmac, taking off and landing in New York, then of his motorcade wending through crosstown traffic, as if rolling up Trump-era and O.J.-era TV excess in one package. On Tuesday, news choppers tracked his drive from Trump Tower to the court building, possibly the most-viewed downtown commute in history.

Ironically, the case that reduced Mr. Trump to a glowering character with no lines was a byproduct of the peak of his TV fame. Stormy Daniels, the porn star whose payoff is at the heart of the investigation, met Mr. Trump during a celebrity golf tournament in 2006, two years after the debut of The Apprentice on NBC.

Mr. Trump has denied having sex with Ms. Daniels. But a well-cultivated playboy rep was long part of the persona that he parlayed into reality-TV stardom, which in turn helped give him the visibility (and the carefully produced image as a business leader) to run for president.

According to reports, Mr. Trump and his advisers debated how much of a spectacle to make of his arraignment. (On CNN, Kaitlan Collins reported that he had expressed some interest in having his mug shot taken; it didnt happen, but his 2024 presidential campaign created its own for a fund-raising pitch anyway.) His lawyers ultimately argued against allowing TV cameras into the courtroom.

Mr. Trump, however, has seemingly lived most of his adult life under the premise that if something didnt happen in front of cameras, it didnt happen. In the past, his go-to response to any situation in which he might have seemed weak or defeated was to script himself a scene in which he was framed as powerful and a winner.

When he was hospitalized with Covid in October 2020, it was a rare instance in which Mr. Trump had no choice but to appear diminished in public. He set out to fix that, posing at a table with a stack of files in the hospital and choreographing his return to the White House, where he removed his face mask on a balcony. As my colleague Maggie Haberman reported, he considered a plan to unbutton his dress shirt and reveal a Superman logo underneath.

One can only imagine the prop ideas floated this time. (Breakaway handcuffs?) Instead, he returned to his comfort zone Mar-a-Lago, surrounded by gilded columns, American flags and the MyPillow guy to run down a Festivus list of grievances to a friendly MAGA crowd.

It was certainly a more pugilistic Mr. Trump than the one who sat in the dock on Tuesday afternoon. But where the arraignment got saturation coverage, only Fox among the major news networks carried the speech beginning to end. As a TV draw, Donald Trump holding court is no competition for Donald Trump sitting in one.

See more here:
For Once, Donald Trump Did Not Enjoy the Show - The New York Times