Archive for the ‘Elon Musk’ Category

Elon Musk says AI will eventually create a situation where ‘no job is needed’ – Fox Business

  1. Elon Musk says AI will eventually create a situation where 'no job is needed'  Fox Business
  2. Elon Musk tells Rishi Sunak AI will put an end to work  BBC.com
  3. Elon Musk says AI will create a world where no job is needed, but Nvidia billionaire Jensen Huang couldnt disagree more: Humans have a lot of ideas  Fortune

Originally posted here:

Elon Musk says AI will eventually create a situation where 'no job is needed' - Fox Business

Elon Musk shares X everything app plan in leaked all-hands – The Verge

Since Elon Musk bought Twitter a year ago, he has blown it up to create something else entirely.

What is now called X is in the process of becoming a single application that encompasses everything, he recently told employees. Being the digital town square, as he has described Twitter in the past, isnt enough. For X to succeed in Musks eyes, the platform needs to compete with YouTube, LinkedIn, FaceTime, dating apps, and the entire banking industry.

Were rapidly transforming the company from what it was, Twitter 1.0, to the everything app, Musk said during an internal X meeting on October 26th, which The Verge listened to and is publishing a full transcript of below. The meeting was timed to the anniversary of Musk officially buying Twitter for $44 billion and was his first joint all-hands with Linda Yaccarino, who joined as CEO in May.

Musk, who still oversees Xs product and engineering teams, did most of the talking during the 45-minute call. While the goal of the all-hands was partially to answer the questions that employees submitted ahead of time, he instead took the opportunity to pontificate on everything from sharing bad news in meetings to the state of journalism.

Turning Twitter into X has been a messy process so far. The companys biggest advertisers have mostly fled over the past year, thanks to Musks antics; his X Premium subscription hasnt caught on; the business is still not profitable; and its valuation is sinking.

Musk, however, projected optimism during the call last week, saying at one point: I think this is the fastest rate of innovation maybe ever for any internet company.

Sign up for Command Line, a paid weekly newsletter from Alex Heath about the tech industrys inside conversation. Your first month is free!

$7/month

A flexible plan you can cancel anytime.

$70/year

A discounted plan to keep you up to date all year.

$60/person/year

Keep your team informed on the inside conversation.

We accept credit card, Apple Pay and Google Pay.

Linda Yaccarino: Its our all-hands, and I want to say thank you to everyone on this call, and especially for everyone in acknowledging what weve been able to accomplish in what has been a remarkable first year since the acquisition. It would be absolutely impossible not to acknowledge all the hard work from everybody around the world whos on this call, especially as weve had to come together since the terrorist attacks by Hamas in Israel. Unspeakable times were living through. It has been 20 days since our teams have been working around the clock to keep this platform safe and a place of connection for those most in need. So, I genuinely say thank you.

Ive been here about 16 weeks. And that means that for about half the year, I was actually on the outside looking in. That outside view is actually what drew me here. And I have to tell you, the insider view: intoxicating. Im grateful to be with all of you. Whats most incredible since I joined the company is the scope of our ambition. The pace of innovation at this company, seriously, nothing else like it exists. No analog for whats going on here. Before I came to X, I was always trying to push our customers, my company, to move faster. No worries. I dont have to do that here. Speed is at our core. The hustle and pace is enviable, and what were building here is completely reshaping what our users and our clients expect of a platform.

We have to take a moment and think about what weve done in just a year. The advancements weve made in video, growing our communities, our creator program, X Hiring. I dont know about you, but some of you may have been victims to all my video calling last night. It doesnt stop. And with payments around the corner, I think its pretty exciting to say that theres no surrogate for X, which is why everyone watches our every move

Elon Musk: And copies us.

LY: When youre as consequential as X is, watching every move, I guess its to be expected. We need to get used to it. We need to lean in and own it. And Im intentionally using the word consequential because were creating something a lot more meaningful here. Were working to protect the freedom of expression. What were doing here in building at X is helping humanity thrive.

Listen, I know the decisions we make are not always expected ones, not always the easy ones. Change, innovation, pushing against legacy. Its not simple. Its actually really hard. But this company, everyone on the call, [are] exceptional people. Were writing history. Really creating a new playbook. And we know there are skeptics out there, but our momentum we all know its catching on. And in the process, were creating more and more advocates.

So, Im long on X. I certainly am long on all of you. And I just want to say congrats on a great big year. Ready for year two. And with that, I will pass it to Elon.

EM: Thank you, Linda. Thank you for joining. A tremendous amount has been accomplished in the past year. Its really lightning speed execution. Were rapidly transforming the company from what it was, Twitter 1.0, to the everything app. [An] all-inclusive feature set that you can basically do anything you want on our system. Obviously, thats not to the exclusion of other apps, but I think the fundamental thing thats missing that would be incredibly useful is a single application that encompasses everything. You can do payments, messages, video, calling, whatever youd like, from one single, convenient place.

They have this in China, to some degree, with WeChat. We just dont have that. It doesnt exist outside of China. This doesnt mean that we just want to copy WeChat. I think we can actually create something ultimately that exceeds WeChat. We can do some pretty incredible stuff here.

The fundamental thing thats missing that would be incredibly useful is a single application that encompasses everything

So, Ill just run through the list of all the accomplishments the team has made in this year. And I should say that well try to do this every quarter as opposed to every year. A year is quite a long time. Every three months or so, well do this. And the next one we will do with X live video. Well just livestream it to earth, basically. Were a company that believes in transparency, so maximally transparent would be anybody who wants to watch our company talk can do so. And its helpful that were not publicly traded actually because you can say what we want to say without some sort of class action lawsuit.

EM: Its honestly a plague. When I looked at the list, I was like, Wow, this is really incredible. So, most recently, we launched audio / video calling, and I had a number of people actually call me

LY: Did you pick up, Elon?

EM: I did. I thought it was like a FaceTime or Signal call or something like that. Its X audio / video calling. Super cool. Thats the most recent thing thats still kind of like a beta version. But itll have all the functionality that people have come to expect from FaceTime or Signal.

Weve also made radical improvements to video in general. So our live video stream is much better, dramatically better. You can now upload long videos, including an entire movie. I thought it was very cool that Apple, for example, uploaded an entire episode of the Silo show, which is actually quite a good show. I was told that it was the number one biggest social media event that Apple has done in its entire history, which is wild. Obviously, companies should do more than that.

LY: That certainly got everyones attention, and when you think about that, in addition to the immersive video product or vertical video product, a lot of people, or a lot of customers that I talk to, are surprised at the growth, right? Seventy percent growth in the last six months but driven by Gen Z. So, when you think about the strides were making so quickly in video, its certainly getting everyones attention.

You can think of a meme as really compressed information

EM: Yeah. Video is the highest bandwidth way to consume information. Sometimes people wonder [about] Gen Z, Is their mind rushing or something because theyre just watching short videos over and over again? But actually, video is the highest bandwidth means of communication. Certainly, what video you are watching, of course, that can be dubious, but obviously, that is the best way to consume information. You can think of a meme as really compressed information, where youre conveying many different ideas in a single image with some text.

So, Ill go through the list, which is pretty, pretty amazing. Its a fun list, actually.

EM: We launched the ad revenue share for creators or really anyone on the platform. This has made a big difference to the lives of many people. Weve paid over $20 million to creators, and we expect that number to rise significantly. Our number of creators has increased by more than an order of magnitude, and thats just since the middle of this year. In less than six months, weve seen a 10x increase in creators.

Communities is growing fast. Theres a lot of work to do to make Communities compelling. But were seeing rapid percentage growth in Communities. Im excited about some of the changes we made to Communities. One of them I think will be quite powerful is for a community administrator to be able to include any X account. You can add any @ handle that hasnt joined the community.

Take this Diablo community, which Im on. What youd want to see there is obviously anything from Blizzard and maybe top video game commentators who are talking about Diablo, in addition to people who have joined that. So think about it as a community but it also includes a list of accounts, which will, I think, really bring life to Communities. I think thats a simple change but a profound one.

LY: And Elon, think about it. When youre talking about all of our innovation and extending to longform video or movies, all the way to Communities, its whats driving time spent on the platform. With video calling, theyre showing up to do more, which will make it more enjoyable for them, more useful. And they stay longer, so theres a lot more to experience, which is beneficial to everyone, all our partners.

EM: Yeah, absolutely. I think people will find that its incredibly compelling to move from a text comment or video comment to direct messages then to an audio / video call, which will include group audio and video calling, and then do payments. For payments, were really just waiting for all the approvals, which we should hopefully get in the next few months.

I think people will find that its incredibly compelling to move from a text comment or video comment to direct messages then to an audio / video call ... and then do payments.

Were at over half a billion monthly users, roughly half a billion posts per day, and over 100 billion impressions a day. These are monster numbers. Were seeing roughly a million new users sign up per day and an increase in the amount of time each user spends on the system. So, this is all good. If there is one goal, its to maximize unregretted user time on the system. Its not just maximize the time that people spend but maximize the unregretted time. Were making good progress on that front.

We also introduced the beginnings of recruiting, kind of like a LinkedIn competitor, essentially. If you are a company that is offering jobs or youre looking for jobs, this is going to be a good spot to find great people. Historically, Ive done a lot of recruiting on here.

LY: And weve talked about it a lot, right, Elon? Just that authentic filter and how hiring just naturally, organically, emerged. Ive actually been maybe a little surprised but really excited about our advertising partners [being] interested in X Hiring. Because youre right, LinkedIn is overdue for some competition. Because of the filtering nature and the authenticity of our platform, they know that theyve already started to explore that. So thats been a really interesting kind of new stream of conversation with customers.

EM: Frankly, I would place more emphasis on what somebody has posted in the past on the X platform than anything else. Have they posted interesting material? That would be probably the single biggest indicator for whether they are excellent and someone youd want to hire.

I think the same is true also on the romantic front. Finding someone on the platform. Obviously, I found someone and friends of mine have found people on the platform. And you can tell if youre a good match based on what they write. So

LY: So, X Dating around the corner then?

EM: Yeah. Theres already some stuff happening to some degree. But I think we might be able to improve the dating situation. Part of it is how do you discover interesting people? Discovery is tough.

LY: Next quarter, well do a livestream. You want to share some vision on any of your streaming visions for the future? Just overall content-wise, just how you see it?

EM: I think video livestreaming is going to be incredibly important for sporting events, for political events, for people who are actually on the spot. Instead of going through the lens of media, you can actually just have people who are literally at ground zero do a livestream or upload video. And so you actually can see whats happening in real time. My understanding is that it was actually quite helpful in Israel for helping people get to safety and highlight issues there.

I sort of approach this as like the collective consciousness

Theres really, I think, a profound shift in news. When you really think about information, I sort of approach this as like the collective consciousness, where if you can think of humanity as a superorganism and all the humans are basically the eyes and ears of the collective mind of humanity, you want to have all those eyes and ears feeding information into the collective mind. Not going through the slow and often distorted lens of media but actually just directly.

People who are actually in a particular industry or in a particular region actually know whats going on better than reporters do. Im not saying that reporters shouldnt write stuff, but how many reporters are there? And how many are actually on the ground? How many were really there versus [those who] read something on the internet or wrote an article? Its really some very tiny number of actual reporters. Most of them are not at the scene, and most of them are not industry experts. Whereas that is the case for X. People are on the scene. Theyre industry experts.

Weve got one of my favorite features, which is Community Notes, that is helpful to distinguish fact from fiction. Community Notes is completely open source, including the data. As I posted, sometimes I get either blamed or I get asked, Hey, can you take this Community Note down? Im like, thats actually not possible. I dont actually have that ability.

LY: Particular to your comments about people being force-fed certain types of media that have certain types of bias, I think we often underestimate peoples ability to seek out the real information and actually make the decisions for themselves.

LY: And thats the beauty of how this works, right? The power of the platform, right? To be able to seek out that information. Thats when Community Notes comes in to give you a little fact-check from people on the ground. And as weve seen, particularly in the last 20 days, how Community Notes has become so powerful, so meaningful, and now that you have so many new readers and contributors through Community Notes, and its quite a unique capability that X offers.

EM: Community Notes started off as Birdwatch. It existed before the acquisition, but it was in a very nascent form and just limited to, really, the US. I put a massive emphasis on this. This is something that we need to make a top priority at the company.

LY: Forty-four countries and over 100,000 contributors. Growth has been really just explosive. So its great.

EM: Im always amazed at the sort of batting average of Community Notes. Nothings perfect, but if a community note has been voted in and stays, the batting average is high 90s with accuracy. In fact, its the most accurate thing. If I want to know whats going on, Im going to look at the community note to figure out if its real or not.

LY: I think its really important to bring up because its one of the singular, most powerful pieces of feedback that we get, even from our biggest skeptics, is our approach to what were doing here that is completely transparent for all to see. When youre talking about Community Notes, I think, in the last 20 days, Ive probably posted five or six times about the evolution and the sophistication and maturation of Community Notes alone. But the way this company is innovating with complete transparency may invite some more of those skeptics. But like no other company in real time, tell them exactly whats going on. And its been really powerful, positive feedback.

Community Notes will be the single best source of truth on the internet, period.

EM: Community Notes is infinitely better than some sort of mysterious censorship bureau where nobody knows who they are or why they make decisions or anything. Thats the kind of thing that lends itself to manipulation of information. I want to be clear, Community Notes will be the single best source of truth on the internet, period.

I want to just go through the list quickly just to acknowledge the great work that has been done. We have picture in picture for videos on web. A ton of video features. Were rapidly reaching parity with YouTube and may exceed them. I test it with an occasional video game thats livestreamed, and were also synchronizing the live video and the stored video because they really should be the same thing. A video thats being uploaded or a video thats live with a delay are essentially the same thing. So were making sure the interface is going to be the same.

I also want to acknowledge those who have deleted code. My general philosophy on software is that you get one point for adding a line of code and two points for deleting. This is a really big deal. So thank you to everyone who has worked hard to simplify the code base and delete and simplify the software.

We are working toward money transmission licenses. Hopefully, those will come through in the next few months. Weve added ID verification, the ability to hide likes. We made it clear that we will support someone if their employer picks on them or fires them for what they post on the system. We will provide them with legal support.

Weve encrypted DMs, and thats also something that we will expand upon. The acid test for DMs, as with Signal, is that if somebody has a gun to my head, I still cant tell you what somebodys DMs are. Basically, they need to be definitively private or you really cant trust them. The team has done a lot to reduce child exploitation material. That has gone down dramatically, I think somewhere on the order of 90 percent-plus.

LY: Not to interrupt you, Elon, certainly. But it is one of the biggest areas of support we get from the partner groups or the interest groups that we work with specifically in this area of what it was like a year ago on the platform and our philosophy of zero tolerance on the platform now. So its something really important that we should celebrate.

EM: Totally. There are a ton more. Were also working to improve search dramatically. We want to have a semantic search. So if you type in search terms, it knows what you mean and then can bring up the text, pictures, and video that are what you mean. Not just strictly a text comparison. Were seeing the beginnings of that with the see similar posts capability. That is sort of an AI-based system.

Really, what we need to move toward is the entire system, all the recommended for you posts being AI-based. Essentially, you populate a vector space around the user and then any given post would also have a vector space. You correlate the two vector spaces, and you show people what is most likely interesting to them. And that will update all of the heuristics that we currently have.

We went through a similar process at Tesla with Full Self-Driving where it started off with almost entirely C++ code and then gradually became more and more a neural net. And now, the latest version of Full Self-Driving, called Rodeo, is entirely neural nets. I think thats going to be very compelling for the recommended feed. Its going to be a game-changer. And it will also mean that if somebody posts a very interesting reply, normally that is buried by default, that is buried with very little exposure, but sometimes the reply is more interesting than the original post. And we currently lose all that. With a purely AI-based system, whatever the reply is, if the reply is compelling, that will be shown more prominently than the original post if its compelling.

LY: Elon, can we talk a little bit about potential continuing efforts that we really are leading the marketplace in, in fighting spam and bots? Because when you look at our user and performance numbers, those are net of everything that weve done aggressively fighting the spam and bots.

EM: Yeah. Where things are today is that even generally available AI, very basic AI much less the sort of cutting-edge stuff, is easily able to overcome the various are you a human? tests. Like, solve this puzzle or tell me which of these pictures have a traffic light. AI is faster and better than people at identifying and passing these are you a human? tests. You dont even need to initially have bots.

You can have, you know, 100 people in a warehouse, each with 100 phones, that are all just going through the are you a human? tests because they are human, and they actually will also be way better than the average human because they do it all day. This is a really big deal, addressing the bots and trolls. Its important to avoid platform manipulation, where someone will spool up 100,000 bots or 100,000 fake accounts to make something seem more viral than it really is or to just spam users with crypto scams, or whatever the case may be. It essentially adds noise to the system and makes our platform less useful.

Advertisers should not find bots very appealing unless the bots are actually buying, which they wont

Its certainly possible if you turn a blind eye to bots for something to seem far busier than it really is. And so, there are other things that may seem incredibly busy, but theyre just really bots. But obviously, bots dont buy things, so advertisers should not find bots very appealing unless the bots are actually buying, which they wont. And then a bunch of the bots will be spam. That means there is bad content. Content that is not interesting. I regard bots and trolls as reducing the signal to noise of the collective mind that is the X platform.

LY: And safe to assume that the Not a Bot program will expand at the right time beyond Singapore and New Zealand, right?

EM: Yeah. Were running an experiment to see what the consequences would be if theres literally $1 a year, which is 0.3 cents per day. Sometimes, I get this absurd thing where its like, How will people in poor parts of the world afford? Im like, They are somehow on the internet. They have an electronic device, and they are on the internet, and a dollar a year is 0.3 cents a day. This is affordable for anyone, obviously.

My experience from X.com way back in the day X / PayPal was that the spammers and fraudsters are the ones who complain the loudest. Whenever some action was taken, it would get the most righteous indignation from the fraudsters because they dont like being shut down. So we expect the same thing here again. But we are being careful about this. Thats why we didnt just start worldwide. Just trying it out in the Philippines and New Zealand. So, well see how it goes [and] make some adjustments.

Even $1 a year, while obviously a tiny amount of money for anyone, any human, is still expensive if you want to do 100,000 bots. Now, you have to have $100,000 to get 100,000 bots, and you need 100,000 payment methods, which is even harder. We have to proceed carefully on that front.

LY: And when we think about the hiring business ready to be disrupted with X Hiring. Also when you think about the PR business with X Wires, [its] pretty exciting, too. Approaching something that I dont think many people ever have thought needs, you know, contemporizing, right?

EM: Yeah. Really, theres no need for PR Newswire. We are PR Newswire. How many individuals actually subscribe to PR Newswire? Basically no one. If you actually want to put out information as a company, were by far the best method of doing so. Thats obviously something we just need to highlight to companies. Corporations that have been around for a while do the same thing theyve been doing for a long time until we point out, Hey, theres a lower cost, easier way to do it, which is just put it on the platform. And thats what were going to do.

LY: I should get the numbers and the result because we just had two pretty nice size agencies merge: Camelot and PMG. They came to me the night before. I dont know if they had heard this weeks ago. They asked us to help them launch the announcement of the merging of the company. They experienced a response that was, you know, just 10x what they could ever imagine going from journalist to journalist or publication to publication to spread the word out. So I think were onto something.

EM: Sounds good. Cool. Yeah, forgive me if Im forgetting to mention because there are so many things that have been accomplished in a year. I think this is the fastest rate of innovation maybe ever for any internet company. Maybe X / PayPal back in the day was similar, but other than that, its certainly a faster rate of innovation for any mature company that has been around for a while by far.

LY: I think the rolling list of numbers is somewhere around 200 product innovations. Im not sure in most companies lifetimes or life cycles that they can talk about those. And even as, you know, consequential as the rollouts have been here, its just one year. And I think thats why because were pushing so much against legacy people are paying a lot of attention to what were doing.

EM: Indeed. The time to be concerned is not when, say, there are media stories about our company dying but when they dont bother to write the stories.

LY: Right. If they stopped writing about us, then we have become irrelevant. Or we always say weve become quite boring, and I dont think were boring. [Laughs]

The time to be concerned is not when, say, there are media stories about our company dying but when they dont bother to write the stories.

EM: Theres also longform content. We can do longform posts now with actually pretty good editing in the posts. Well be releasing the ability to have a very sophisticated text output comparable to what someone would do on some of the other platforms out there. Basically, complete rich text posting that [will let you] post a novel, basically, including an illustrated novel with video. Anyways, theres a ton. We are leaving out a few things. Thats a partial list of accomplishments. Theres a lot more to come in the future, obviously.

LY: Were all looking forward to that. There is no way any of this long, long list of accomplishments could have happened without the unconditional dedication of this team. Its one of the biggest things Ive experienced and am in awe of since I joined the company.

A company that was 8,000 [employees] has gone to a little under 1,500 and accomplished what we have accomplished. I think its pretty much writing a rule or a playbook that other companies should pay attention to. So thank you to everyone. Its incredible output.

EM: Super exciting. I look forward to doing the next one live on our platform.

LY: Thatll be next quarter. And we can talk about a lot more then. Alrighty.

EM: Are there any questions? Im happy to just keep going.

LY: Yeah, if we send them to Elon, well answer them.

EM: Just reply to my post.

LY: There was one question from someone I thought was interesting of what they havent heard about yet: what in your mind could come next thatll surprise everybody?

EM: I think payments and just generally being a financial hub is going to surprise people [with] just how powerful it is. I really understand this world, obviously. The X / PayPal product roadmap was written by myself and David Sacks, actually, in July of 2000. For some reason, once it became eBay, not only did they not implement the rest of the list but they actually rolled back a bunch of key features, which is crazy. PayPal is a less complete product than what we came up with in July of 2000, so 23 years ago.

When I say payments, I actually mean someones entire financial life.

When I say payments, I actually mean someones entire financial life. If it involves money, itll be on our platform money or securities or whatever. Its not just, you know, send 20 bucks to my friend. Im talking about, like, you wont need a bank account.

LY: And that we see coming full opportunity in 24, right?

EM: Oh, yeah. I mean, it would blow my mind if we dont have that rolled out by the end of next year.

LY: Someone asked me, which was interesting. Ill take a shot at it first, and maybe you riff on it a little bit. And it was, What is the one thing that we should stop doing in year two and one thing we should start doing in year two? And I thought about it. Everything weve talked about today. But for people who dont see our vision yet, people who dont see whats happening here at X, stop giving any of that oxygen. Dont pay attention to it. Heads down. See whats happening here and realize everything that were building here. So we make sure payments makes it, you know, actually as robust [an] offering as possible.

Excerpt from:

Elon Musk shares X everything app plan in leaked all-hands - The Verge

UAW strike ends in deals with the Big Three. Is Elon Musk next? – Slate

1. Shawn Fain A big W for the UAW.

Earlier this year, onetime Indiana auto-plant electrician Shawn Fain took office as the president of the United Auto Workers after winning the unions first-ever election in which leaders were selected by a direct vote of members rather than by delegates to a convention. In September, he launched a national series of pop-up strikes against the Big Three automakersFord, General Motors, and the company that is now for some reason called Stellantis but is basically the one you remember as Chryslerwhile engaging in what, for the union, was an unusually public and rabble-rousing campaign of class warfare rhetoric. It was a bold strategy, particularly when paired with UAWs central demand for a 40 percent pay increase and the perennial reality that North American vehicle manufacturing operations can always be moved to Mexico. But it pretty much worked! As of this week, tentative agreements for 25 percent raises have been reached with the Big Three, and Toyota is raising its own U.S. wages, even though its plants arent unionized. Next up, potentially, is a fight to organize Elon Musks Tesla, which I think we can safely say would be one of the least predictable worker versus management confrontations to occur since Karl Marx and FDR invented unions in 1932. (The Surge majored in history, but not labor history.) Today, Americas ongoing revival of unapologetic leftism is spelled S-H-A-W-N.

Originally posted here:

UAW strike ends in deals with the Big Three. Is Elon Musk next? - Slate

Who is Elon Musk and what is his net worth? – Yahoo! Voices

It seems like not a day goes by without billionaire Elon Musk making headlines.

The boss of X (formerly Twitter), Tesla and SpaceX is the world's richest person and uses his platform to make his views known on a vast array of topics.

He is currently in the UK for a global summit on artificial intelligence.

Ahead of the event he said he thought AI could lead to humanity's extinction - without giving any detail on how he believed that could actually happen.

Since bursting on to the Silicon Valley scene more than two decades ago, the 52-year-old serial entrepreneur has kept the public captivated with his business antics.

Born in Pretoria, South Africa, Mr Musk showed his talents for entrepreneurship early, going door-to-door with his brother selling homemade chocolate Easter eggs and developing his first computer game at the age of 12.

He has described his childhood as difficult, affected by his parents' divorce, bullying at school and his own difficulty picking up on social cues because of Asperger's Syndrome. At the earliest opportunity, he left home for college, moving to Canada and then the US, where he studied economics and physics at the University of Pennsylvania, an Ivy League college.

In a 2010 essay for Marie Claire, his first wife, Justine Musk, a writer whom he met in college and married in 2000, wrote that even before making his millions Mr Musk was "not a man who takes no for an answer".

"The will to compete and dominate, that made him so successful in business, did not magically shut off when he came home," she recalled, adding that he told her while dancing at their wedding, "I am the alpha in this relationship."

After being accepted to a physics graduate degree programme at Stanford University, Mr Musk quickly dropped out and founded two technology start-ups during the "dotcom boom" of the 1990s. These included a web software firm and an online banking company that eventually became PayPal, which was sold to eBay in 2002 for $1.5bn.

He ploughed his fortune into a new rocket company, SpaceX - which he aimed to make a cost-effective alternative to Nasa - and a new electric car company, Tesla, where he chaired the board until becoming chief executive in 2008.

The two firms are credited with upending their industries, even as they sometimes veered close to financial collapse.

More recent business ventures include his takeover of social media platform Twitter in October 2022.

Since then he has dramatically reduced the size of its workforce including, controversially, cuts to teams responsible for keeping the platform safe; rebranded the company as X; and introduced new premium subscriptions so that the business does not rely on advertising alone for income.

Mr Musk's long-term ambition is for X to become an "everything app" offering a range of services. However, so far the value of the firm has plunged from the $44bn he originally paid to just $19bn, according to reports.

He also has ambitions in the AI sector, being an early investor in ChatGPT's parent company, before parting ways and setting up his own company xAI in July, whose mission is "to understand the true nature of the universe".

"I'm never hugely convinced that he knows what he wants to do tomorrow," says journalist Chris Stokel-Walker. "He very much leads by instinct."

In a 2015 biography, author Ashlee Vance described Mr Musk as "a confrontational know-it-all" with an "abundant ego". But he also called him an awkward dancer and diffident public speaker.

Divorced three times - twice from the same woman, British actress Talulah Riley - Mr Musk is frank about his vices, regularly discussing his fondness for marijuana.

In the press, he's been dubbed both a mad genius and Twitter's biggest troll - known as much for his lofty ambitions as his petty fights, not to mention the more serious lawsuits he and his companies have faced from regulators, investors and others over issues such as racial discrimination and the trustworthiness of his claims.

"If you list my sins, I sound like the worst person on Earth," Mr Musk said in a TED interview last year. "But if you put those against the things I've done right, it makes much more sense."

All those contradictions appear to be part of his appeal - and it certainly hasn't stopped him from amassing a fortune.

Bloomberg and Forbes rank him as the world's richest person, estimating his net worth to be between $198bn (162bn) and $220bn (180bn), as of November 2023.

That's based largely on the value of his shares in Tesla, of which he owns more than 13%. The company's stock soared in value - some say unreasonably - in 2020 as the firm's output increased and it started to deliver regular profits.

The shares plunged at the end of last year, with some blaming the distraction of the Twitter takeover for the fall, though they have since recovered ground.

Mr Musk also champions digital currencies and has a hand in several other smaller companies, including tunnel-maker the Boring Company and experimental brain-computer start-up Neuralink.

Mr Musk, who wears the mantle of a workaholic proudly, has often said he's not in business simply to make money - claims he repeated recently with regard to his Twitter takeover.

"Elon only gets involved with things if he feels that they're critically important for some reason... for the sake of society or humanity," says friend and Tesla investor Ross Gerber.

Mr Musk, who became a US citizen in 2002, has resisted efforts to label his politics - calling himself "half-Democrat, half-Republican", "politically moderate" and "independent".

That doesn't mean he's shied away from political debate.

He has injected himself into some of the world's hottest geopolitical fights - suggesting that China should establish a "special administrative zone" in Taiwan, and proposing terms to resolve the war in Ukraine that were adamantly rejected by many of the country's top leaders.

While Mr Musk provided his Starlink satellite internet service to Ukraine, he has also attracted criticism for refusing an emergency request from Kyiv to activate Starlink in Sevastopol, home to a major Russian navy port.

In the US, he moved to Texas, complaining of California's regulations and high taxes; has clashed with union organisers; and, in the spring of 2020, decried coronavirus lockdowns as "fascist".

He was one of the first business executives to part ways with former President Donald Trump, quitting a White House business council after Mr Trump withdrew the US from a global climate agreement.

But he's also made it clear he's not a fan of President Joe Biden, whom he sees as snubbing Tesla while promoting electric vehicles.

He has said that he sees his businesses as a form of philanthropy, because they are focused on solving major human issues, such as climate change in the case of Tesla.

And despite his own interest in artificial intelligence, he has also been one of the most prominent figures worried about the supposed threat to humanity's future that super-intelligent AIs might pose.

He has claimed that the rise of artificial intelligence, combined with a declining birth rate, could result in "not enough people" being in the world.

Here, you can't accuse him of not doing his part.

Mr Musk has had 11 children - six with his first wife, three with Canadian singer Grimes, and two with Shivon Zilis.

Following the birth of his twins with Ms Zilis, he tweeted: "Doing my best to help the underpopulation crisis."

Additional reporting by Liv McMahon

See original here:

Who is Elon Musk and what is his net worth? - Yahoo! Voices

Elon Musk and Other AI Doomers Cause Meltdown – Gizmodo

Welcome to AI This Week, Gizmodos weekly roundup where we do a deep dive on whats been happening in artificial intelligence.

Did Elon Musk Regret Buying Twitter? | Walter Isaacson Interview

As governments fumble for a regulatory approach to AI, everybody in the tech world seems to have an opinion about what that approach should be and most of those opinions do not resemble one another. Suffice it to say, this week presented plenty of opportunities for tech nerds to yell at each other online, as two major developments in the space of AI regulations took place, immediately spurring debate.

The first of those big developments was the United Kingdoms much-hyped artificial intelligence summit, which saw the UKs prime minister, Rishi Sunak, invite some of the worlds top tech CEOs and leaders to Bletchley Park, home of the UKs WWII codebreakers, in an effort to suss out the promise and peril of the new technology. The event was marked by a lot of big claims about the dangers of the emergent technology and ended with an agreement surrounding security testing of new software models. The second (arguably bigger) event to happen this week was the unveiling of the Biden administrations AI executive order, which laid out some modest regulatory initiatives surrounding the new technology in the U.S. Among many other things, the EO also involved a corporate commitment to security testing of software models.

However, some prominent critics have argued that the US and UKs efforts to wrangle artificial intelligence have been too heavily influenced by a certain strain of corporately-backed doomerism which critics see as a calculated ploy on the part of the tech industrys most powerful companies. According to this theory, companies like Google, Microsoft, and OpenAI are using AI scaremongering in an effort to squelch open-source research into the tech as well as make it too onerous for smaller startups to operate while keeping its development firmly within the confines of their own corporate laboratories. The allegation that keeps coming up is regulatory capture.

This conversation exploded out into the open on Monday with the publication of an interview with Andrew Ng, a professor at Stanford University and the founder of Google Brain. There are definitely large tech companies that would rather not have to try to compete with open source [AI], so theyre creating fear of AI leading to human extinction, Ng told the news outlet. Ng also said that two equally bad ideas had been joined together via doomerist discourse: that AI could make us go extinct and that, consequently, a good way to make AI safer is to impose burdensome licensing requirements on AI producers.

More criticism swiftly came down the pipe from Yann LeCun, Metas top AI scientist and a big proponent of open-source AI research, who got into a fight with another techie on X about how Metas competitors were attempting to commandeer the field for themselves. Altman, Hassabis, and Amodei are the ones doing massive corporate lobbying at the moment, LeCun said, in reference to OpenAI, Google, and Anthropics top AI executives. They are the ones who are attempting to perform a regulatory capture of the AI industry. You, Geoff, and Yoshua are giving ammunition to those who are lobbying for a ban on open AI R&D, he said.

After Ng and LeCuns comments circulated, Google Deepminds current CEO, Demis Hassabis, was forced to respond. In an interview with CNBC, he said that Google wasnt trying to achieve regulatory capture and said: I pretty much disagree with most of those comments from Yann.

Predictably, Sam Altman eventually decided to jump into the fray to let everybody know that no, actually, hes a great guy and this whole scaring-people-into-submitting-to-his-business-interests thing is really not his style. On Thursday, the OpenAI CEO tweeted:

there are some great parts about the AI EO, but as the govt implements it, it will be important not to slow down innovation by smaller companies/research teams. i am pro-regulation on frontier systems, which is what openai has been calling for, and against regulatory capture.

So, capture it is then, one person commented, beneath Altmans tweet.

Of course, no squabble about AI would be complete without a healthy mouthful from the worlds most opinion-filled internet troll and AI funder, Elon Musk. Musk gave himself the opportunity to provide that mouthful this week by somehow forcing the UKs Sunak to conduct an interview with him (Musk), which was later streamed to Musks own website, X. During the conversation, which amounted to Sunak looking like he wanted to take a nap and sleepily asking the billionaire a roster of questions, Musk managed to get in some classic Musk-isms. Musks comments werent so much thought-provoking or rooted in any sort of serious policy discussion as they were dumb and entertainingwhich is more the style of rhetoric he excels at.

Included in Musks roster of comments was that AI will eventually create what he called a future of abundance where there is no scarcity of goods and services and where the average job is basically redundant. However, the billionaire also warned that we should still be worried about some sort of rogue AI-driven superintelligence and that humanoid robots that can chase you into a building or up a tree were also a potential thing to be worried about.

When the conversation rolled around to regulations, Musk claimed that he agreed with most regulations but said, of AI: I generally think its good for government to play a role when public safety is at risk. Really, for the vast majority of software, public safety is not at risk. If an app crashes on your phone or laptop its not a massive catastrophe. But when we talk about digital superintelligencewhich does pose a risk to the publicthen there is a role for government to play. In other words, whenever software starts resembling that thing from the most recent Mission Impossible movie then Musk will probably be comfortable with the government getting involved. Until then...ehhh.

Musk may want regulators to hold off on any sort of serious policies since his own AI company is apparently debuting its technology soon. In a tweet on X on Friday, Musk announced that his startup, xAI, planned to release its first AI to a select group on Saturday and that this tech was in some important respects, the best that currently exists. Thats about as clear as mud, though itd probably be safe to assume that Musks promises are somewhere in the same neighborhood of hyperbole as his original comments about the Tesla bot.

This week we spoke with Samir Jain, vice president of policy at the Center for Democracy and Technology, to get his thoughts on the much anticipated executive order from the White House on artificial intelligence. The Biden administrations EO is being looked at as the first step in a regulatory process that could take years to unfold. Some onlookers praised the Biden administrations efforts; others werent so thrilled. Jain spoke with us about his thoughts on the legislation as well as his hopes for future regulation. This interview has been edited for brevity and clarity.

I just wanted to get your initial response to Bidens executive order. Are you pleased with it? Hopeful? Or do you feel like it leaves some stuff out?

Overall we are pleased with the executive order. We think it identifies a lot of key issues, in particular current harms that are happening, and that it really tries to bring together different agencies across the government to address those issues. Theres a lot of work to be done to implement the order and its directives. So, ultimately, I think the judgment as to whether its an effective EO or not will turn to a significant degree on how that implementation goes. The question is whether those agencies and other parts of government will carry out those tasks effectively. In terms of setting a direction, in terms of identifying issues and recognizing that the administration can only act within the scope of the authority that it currently has...we were quite pleased with the comprehensive nature of the EO.

One of the things the EO seems like its trying to tackle is this idea of long-term harms around AI and some of the more catastrophic potentialities of the way in which it could be wielded. It seems like the executive order focuses more on the long-term harms rather than the short-term ones. Would you say thats true?

Im not sure thats true. I think youre characterizing the discussion correctly, in that theres this idea out there that theres a dichotomy between long-term and short-term harms. But I actually think that, in many respects, thats a false dichotomy. Its a false dichotomy both in the sense that we should have to choose one or the otherand in fact, we shouldnt; and, also, a lot of the infrastructure and steps that you would take to deal with current harms are also going to help in dealing with whatever long-term harms there may be. So, if for example, we do a good job with promoting and entrenching transparencyin terms of the use and capability of AI systemsthats going to also help us when we turn to addressing longer-term harms.

With respect to the EO, although there certainly are provisions that deal with long-term harms...theres actually a lot in the EOI would go so far as to say the bulk of the EOdeals with current and existing harms. Its directing the Secretary of Labor to mitigate potential harms from AI-based tracking of workers; its calling on the Housing and Urban Development and Consumer Financial Protection bureaus to develop guidance around algorithmic tenant screening; its directing the Department of Education to figure out some resources and guidance about the safe and non-discriminatory use of AI in education; its telling the Health and Human Services Department to look at benefits administration and to make sure that AI doesnt undermine equitable administration of benefits. Ill stop there, but thats all to say that I think it does a lot with respect to protecting against current harms.

Here is the original post:

Elon Musk and Other AI Doomers Cause Meltdown - Gizmodo